10 January, 2010

Wilhelm Marr’s The Victory of Judaism over Germanism: Viewed from a Nonreligious Point of View

Posted by Socrates in jews, judaism, Kevin MacDonald, Socrates at 4:01 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald: [Here].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 08/06/07 ADL Criticized by Armenians 100% similar
  3. 11/11/08 Book Review 100% similar
  4. 12/25/07 “Philip Weiss II: Jews as a Component of the American Elite” 100% similar
  5. 04/20/09 A Comment on Paul Gottfried’s Review of Cultural Insurrections 100% similar
  6. 10/16/07 “The Israel Lobby and the Psychology of Influence” 100% similar
  7. 25 Responses to “Wilhelm Marr’s The Victory of Judaism over Germanism: Viewed from a Nonreligious Point of View”

    1. Karen Says:

      How can this view be said to be nonreligious. Christianity which has been the jew’s gateway to enter and destroy from within has been their power over Aryan nations. Christianity is judaism. Marrs is blaming the victim like so many jews do.

    2. Tim McGreen Says:

      Well said, Karen….But the claim that Jews were “enslaved” by various conquerors over the centuries is, if you’ll pardon the term, a “canard”. If anything, the Jews are the ones who have always controlled the international slave trade, and still do so today. Amazing how Shylock always manages to accuse others of what he himself is guilty of.

    3. rt Says:

      another bull shit rambling opinion piece on jews. hook-nose trolls are good at exploiting the civilizations which they live in. jews don’t have the ability to build civiliizations so they do the next best thing — exploit the hell out of it. Why not? It’s easy to live in a house when you contribute nothing to keep it running. the jew boys have all the time in the world to scheme and gouge.

      but the jews have a downside — you can only fake it for so long !

    4. Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      Amazing how Shylock always manages to accuse others of what he himself is guilty of. – Tim Mcgreen

      Polacks have a saying: “The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”

      One change in my thinking recently has been that our own people, i.e. elites in the intelligentsia and military (in the old days the priests and kings/nobles), have always to some degree relied on the services of elite jewry thus allowing them a foothold in our societies. Because they are by nature opportunists they always managed to exploit these footholds and gain ever larger power and influence.

      If we are to be free of them once and for all we must first be able to govern ourselves effectively without reliance upon the supra-national entity known as jewry. A simple look at our history, i.e. since the early days of Germanic civilization, tells us this is easier said than done.

      I advocate military dictatorship, republicanism is not robust enough to maintain itself.

    5. rt Says:

      military dictatorship? we already have that. besides, jews don’t care what the government is. they operate with great effect whether the rule is communism, democracy, dictatorship, whatever. international jewry has a format for all civilizations.

      i advocate local rule — nothing beyond the county level. jews hate rule by the folk. it greatly compromises their trickery.

    6. half soldier Says:

      I agree, jew are never enslaved, they just look around for a good sucker , and in good Larry, Moe, and Curley joe style fall down and worship them… Yeah I recall that famous epic “Lawrence of Arabia” where 2 Bedouin youth wish to become Lord ‘awrence personal servants, Omar Sharif puts the cane to them and scolds them “These are not servants, these are worshipper!” “Who can stand against Flattery” as the mold testament says, especially of the semitic variety. Going off on a tangent here, but I think we need to focus more on the Mexican invasion, because they threaten our existence, they really want to do us in with methods even the Jews would find a novelty something on the order of Apocolypto

    7. half soldier Says:

      Amazing how Shylock always manages to accuse others of what he himself is guilty of. – Tim Mcgreen

      Polacks have a saying: “The jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”

      I THINK THE MEXISHITS HAVE CAUGHT ON TO SOME OF THE JEWS PRE-EMPTIVE WHINING… I WAS ONCE WORKING WITH WORTHLESS MEXISHIT WHO USE TO SAY TO THE GRINGO’S ” IF YOU HURT ME, I’M GONNA BEAT YOU UP.”

      STUPID AND INFANTILE ? YES, BUT IT WORKS LIKE A LITTLE KID CAN GET HIS WAY. JEWS, MEXISHITS, NIGGERS, THEY’RE ALL BABIES, THEY HAVE TO WHINE, BECAUSE THEY COULDN’T MAKE ANY WHERE ELSE BUT IN THE JUNGLE.
      AND WE DAMN WELL BETTER CATCH ON TO THE FACT THAT WE NEED ETHNIC CLEANSING TO GET RID OF THESE PESTS.

    8. half soldier Says:

      WE’VE HAD AN OVERLOAD OF JEWS, SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY, THE SCUMBAGS ALWAYS HEAD TO THE CENTERS OF TRADE, THEN CAME THE 20TH CENTURY PHENOMENA, CREATED BY WHITES, INSTEAD OF PADLOCKING THE JEWS DOWN IN INSANE ASYLUMS CALLED GHETOS, TRAITORS CALLED SHABBAZ GOYIM FACILITATED THEIR INFESTATION OF GOVERNMENT, CULTURE, PRESS. NO MODERATE PUSSY WHIPPED “CAN WE JES GET ALONG” IS GONNA WORK, THE JEW GOTTA GO, AND THEY SHOULD HAVE GOT A MILLION YEARS AGO, WITH THE DEATH OF THEIR NEANDERTHAL COUSINS.

    9. half soldier Says:

      The Historian Toynbee, said “the Jews are the remanant of a fossilized civilization”. I do believe they are fossils, but not of a civilization, unless you think living in cave full of dung is civilization. They are I believe Neanderthals, and if you go by Injun rules “we were here first” than perhaps the jews can claim direct ancestry to Germanys oldest inhabitants.

    10. half soldier Says:

      Lock up the jews in the Bronx Zoo

    11. half soldier Says:

      THE JEWS HAVE NEVER BEEN CREATIVE, LOOK AT THE MOLD TESTAMENT ACCOUNT OF TAKING OVER CITIES THEY HAD’NT BUILT, EATING GRAPES FROM VINES THAT THEY HADN’T PLANTED, THEN THEIR HATRED OF THE PHILISTINES WHO HAD THE MONOPOLY ON METALLURGY TO WHOM THE JEWS HAD TO COME TO SHARPEN THEIR IMPLEMENTS… OH THOSE PHILISTINES THEY SURE PISSED OFF THE CHOSEN, BECAUSE THEY MADE THEM DO SOME WORK… NOTHING IS MORE ANATHEMIC TO A JEW. THE JEWS ARE NEANTHERTHALS OR A CLOSE RELATIVE, THAT SOMEHOW ACQUIRED THE LANGUAGE OF REAL MEN, AND COUPLED WITH THEIR BETTER ANIMAL INSTINCTS USED THE POWERS OF PERSUASION TO DESTROY THE HOST.

    12. Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      “military dictatorship? we already have that.”

      Controlled by the zhids.

      “i advocate local rule — nothing beyond the county level. jews hate rule by the folk.”

      It isn’t about what “jews hate.” It’s about practical arrangements for self-governance, i.e. robust enough governance to protect from internal and external threats.

    13. FD Says:

      We have a robust government and it wages perpetual war. No thanks.

      Regional tribalism will come about naturally. That will keep people outside my area telling me what to do. If your area suffers an invasion — fight back.

      Governments are plastic. They ultimately wage war against nature. And that is what Jews do.

    14. half soldier Says:

      Governments are plastic. They ultimately wage war against nature. And that is what Jews do.

      Governments like clothes are the badge of lost innocence, the palaces of kings are built about the bowers of Eden- Thomas Paine

      TOO BAD THE SOUTHERN STATES DIDN’T WALK OUT IN MASS FROM THE “KAHN’STITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN 1787, THAT WOULD HAVE STOPPED THE US ZOG IN ITS TRACKS.

    15. half soldier Says:

      GUV’MINT IS CHIEFLY BAD FOR WHITES, BECAUSE IT COMES ABOUT FROM COMMITTEES, ROBBERS RULES OF ORDER IS THEIR FAV-O-RITE TEXT FOR DUCKING REAL ISSUES,STIFELING DEBATE(THEY REALLY NEED DUELS), HAMSTRINGIN ANYTHING NOBLE AND WORTHFILE AND SPONTANEOUS WITH GARLANDS OF RED BURRORATIC TAPE. ONCE YOU GET RID THESE SANHEDRINS FROM THE FEDERAL LEVEL, ALL THE 50 SATRAPIES CALLED STATES WILL BE AS GEOGRAPHICALLY SIGNIFICANT AS A MEXISHITS GRAFFITTI ON A SHITTER WALL.

    16. Tim McGreen Says:

      The idea of a military dictatorship is a good one, I’d say. Let a bunch of pro-White colonels, generals and admirals run the country. They would do it efficiently and, if necessary, ruthlessly. And if one of them dies or retires, so what? He can be replaced easily enough with another guy.

      I just don’t want any more “democratic” governments that are filled with “elected representatives”. They have shown themselves to be nothing but lying, corrupt, money-grubbing parasites and sell-outs.

    17. FD Says:

      The idea of a military dictatorship is horrible: consolidated despotism; big government; heavy taxes.

    18. Tim McGreen Says:

      Chile, Spain, East Germany, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Iraq and other countries did pretty well under military dictatorships. Low crime, high levels of patriotism, no muds being brought in to drive down wages, political stability, cool-looking uniforms…I’d say it’s win-win!

    19. half soldier Says:

      ANY GOVERNMENT THAT IS TOTALLY “OURS” IS GOOD, ANYTHING THAT ISN’T TOTALLY OURS IS BAD.
      CALL IT TOTALITARINISM,

    20. fd Says:

      good luck with a dictatorship style government — centralized authority and big government is the worst — there should be at least 5 or 6 sovereign governments across the country — a forced alliance has never worked

    21. Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      Now see, Tim McGreen, who I suspect used to post here as “Zarathustra” is right on. The realistic assessment shows that we cannot allow some decentralized regime to take over. It isn’t a matter of the “pathological need for control inherent to Aryans” (that is jew projection). It is a matter of building communities which do not rely upon alien interlopers. I am certainly willing to accept it (i.e. pro-white military dictatorship) if it means no more Faustian Pacts with the devil.

    22. Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      “I just don’t want any more “democratic” governments that are filled with “elected representatives”. They have shown themselves to be nothing but lying, corrupt, money-grubbing parasites and sell-outs.” – TM

      Yessir, anyone who truly analyzes these entities will realize that they are peasant regimes which care nothing about the racial composition of nations, but rather care only for their bottomless greed. Capitalists are the enemies of the white race. In the old days the aristocrats understood that autarkous states were necessary to the preservation of the racial stock and what’s more, beneficial to the long-term interests of the ruling stock.

      All of this is, of course, in complete opposition to the modern Weltanschauung which posits that all decisions should be to the short-term benefit and ultimately deleterious.

    23. Krystian Kowalczyk Says:

      “good luck with a dictatorship style government — centralized authority and big government is the worst — there should be at least 5 or 6 sovereign governments across the country — a forced alliance has never worked”

      Fuck off von Mises “Austrian econ” jew! LULZ.

    24. Joe Says:

      The only way to kill a parasite is to stop feeding it. Ignore them and focus all your energy into local positive outreach. Start gardens on empty lots growing healthy food, collect rainwater in 50 gallon buckets to get fluoride free drinking water. Order zeolite mineral powder to detoxify mercury out of your body and reverse autism. All of these things are far more important than preaching about racial ideology.

    25. Henry Says:

      TOO BAD THE SOUTHERN STATES DIDN’T WALK OUT IN MASS FROM THE “KAHN’STITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN 1787, THAT WOULD HAVE STOPPED THE US ZOG IN ITS TRACKS.

      No, you’re mistaken. Jews were well established in the South, and they had a large amount of influence in the Confederacy. In fact, I believe that, before the Civil war, there were more Jews in the South than the North. The two principal Jewish centers in the USA had been Charleston and New Orleans, both cities that were centers of slave trading, banking and brokerage. After the South was left in ruins, many Jews moved north and New York emerged as the new Jewish capital, which it had not been prior to 1860.