29 June, 2010

Nice, Polite, Fair-Minded Conservatives Always Fumble the Football Before They Reach the End-Zone

Posted by Socrates in conservatism, conservatives, constitution, guns & goy controllers, guns and gun issues, Socrates at 5:25 pm | Permanent Link

It’s almost like conservatives are afraid to win. Here was a golden chance to spell out exactly what the Second Amendment really means, in home, car, boat, etc., after decades of legal ambiguity. But no. And by saying that state/local governments can place “reasonable” restrictions on guns (what does that mean?), the conservatives on the court have guaranteed that gun lawsuits (both pro and anti) will clog courts for the next 40 years:

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 07/30/16 One More Time: Why Do States Have Legislatures? 30% similar
  3. 05/22/07 The Federal Government Today 26% similar
  4. 01/13/15 Everything Is Federal Now 26% similar
  5. 01/09/10 Play Nice and What Happens? 25% similar
  6. 10/23/19 Video: White People Protecting Themselves in Negro Countries: Good Luck with That 23% similar
  7. 65 Responses to “Nice, Polite, Fair-Minded Conservatives Always Fumble the Football Before They Reach the End-Zone”

    1. Blackshirt Says:

      How can anyone who comes to this website possibly disagree with the statement I made in my post above? I suspect there is some fishy shit going on with this “yahoody” character and his friends putting thumbs down on posts. “Yahoody” and “Carpenter” show up out of nowhere and immediately start attacking me and other posters… seems like the return of agent McReen if you ask me- same M.O..

    2. Tim McGreen Says:

      McReen was a real hemorrhoid. But Carpenter and Yehudi are just a pain in the ass.

    3. old dutch Says:

      Hey, Ein. You are full of it. That’s all antique Roman
      Catholic propaganda you are talking.

      It was The Elector of Saxony who led the Protestant armies south to defeat the Moslems at Vienna. He could have waited for the Moslems to destroy your Austrian-Spanish Roman Catholic ancestors at Vienna, but, he didn’t! LOL.

      The Protestant forces moved against the Moslems at Vienna even though the French & Italian Roman Catholics were invading and raiding all along the Rhine at the time.

      Cromwell, hell. We need a Cromwell today to drive these damn Roman Catholic politicians & their Jew allies out of Washington and into exile. LOL.

    4. Blackshirt Says:

      OD, you seem to be forgetting that it was the Catholic king Jan Sobieski from Poland who really saved the day at the battle of Vienna.

    5. Blackshirt Says:

      Tim, regarding “Yahoody” “Carpenter” “Jimmy Smith” and now “Joe”, I believe they are all one person, probably McReen. All of these aliases all showed up here within the past week or so, saying the same things, attacking you and me specifically.

    6. Tim McGreen Says:

      It could be Agent McReen up to his old tricks again. After all, those new “personalities” posting here are every bit as dumb and obnoxious as he was. Scooby-Doo and I will check behind that curtain over there. You wait here with Maggie and Thelma.

    7. Arminius Says:

      Blackshirt, you are wrong. Good Catholic Jan Sobiesky did NOT save the day at the Turkish siege of Vienna. Historians state, he hid with his troops during battle in the Vienna woods and prayed.
      Sobiesky was in the pay of French king Louis XIV., who wanted the Turks to advance to the Rhine and was thus a secret ally of the Turks. I have stated details of their betrayal here years ago, you may find them the archives right.

    8. Yahoody Doody Says:

      Highly suspect! Can you give documentation for that?
      If he wanted the Turks to win, why didn’t he join them in the battle and help? Why did he even go to Vienna at all?

      This sounds like more trollish deception to me.
      Somebody keeps tossing a wrench into the gears, and our trusting goys just don’t catch on that they’re being laughed at in Tel Aviv.

    9. Arminius Says:

      Y.D. exhibits, I regret to state, a truly childlike naivite’ in historical and political matters.
      Admittedly the vast majority, the so called masses (to which he belongs) are on his side. Too dumb to understand that politics has been for centuries and millenia a bit more sophisticated that Y.D. is able to grasp.
      Politics aims to achieve an advantage, goal or purpose which has to kept hidden because its revelation would defeat it.
      I give an example, which has been discussed here often:
      The Jewish agenda to exploit state and country to their benefit is achieved in very roundabout way and its policy is to keep the masses in ignorance how it is pursued. Or: Y.D. may study the political tricks FDR used to bring the US into WW2.
      As far that crook Sobiesky is concerned, he should look into the archive to the right, “Mel Gibson”: “Don’t give up on Mel Gibson”, 10-October 2006.

    10. Tim McGreen Says:

      Arminius, you are being far too kind to Yahoody Douchebag, for he is more than just dumb or childishly naive. He is a FUCKING JERK.

    11. Henry Says:

      I wish the low-rated comments did not get hidden. I would like to read them and see what they said. I can make up my own mind.

    12. Jim Says:

      They are not hidden Henry. Hit “press here to see”

    13. Henry Says:

      #1. Even so, they shoulddn’t hide them.

      #2. Ohter thing: It just was on the news that “they” are investigating Mel Gibson for domestic abuse.

      Hmmm. I wonder who “they” are? When Gibson had that run-in with the Jewish cop, and ran his mouth about Jews, I think that was his death sentence. Professionally anyway. They never forget and always manage to get even.

    14. Tim McGreen Says:

      “Henry Says:

      6 July, 2010 at 9:42 pm

      I wish the low-rated comments did not get hidden. I would like to read them and see what they said. I can make up my own mind.”

      ***********

      I agree. I don’t like censorship of any kind. There is also way too much room for abuse of the thumbs up/down system, as exemplified by Yahoody and ZOG. They are allowed to get away with repeatedly clicking the thumbs down on my posts, while repeatedly clicking the thumbs up for their own.

      Ideally, no one should be allowed to click yay or nay more than once per post. Those two clowns must have access to various computers with different IP addresses. It’s dishonest as all get out, but what do they care? They have no sense of decency. They’re just creeps. Creeps and cretins with no life, that’s what they are. And I will gladly tell them so to their ugly warthog-like faces if they have the courage to ask me. Which they don’t.

      ***************
      On the advice of her scheming Jew lawyers, Mel Gibson’s slutty, gold-digging Russian ex-girlfriend made a recording of a drunken Gibson tirade over the phone. She was probably instructed by her well-paid Kikes on how to provoke the actor into saying certain unpleasant things so that they could be used as evidence against him in court and thus destroy his career.

      Gibson is hardly the first actor with a drinking or temper-control problem. And unlike many other actors he’s not a fag, a dope-fiend or a sex-offender. But he has run afoul of the Sacred Ones and that is apparently the worst crime imaginable.

    15. Yahoody Doody Says:

      I agree here. I dont like censortship either. I think all posts should be available for all to view. That seems only fair.