18 April, 2010
‘Sex and the City’: Good for Your Country?
Posted by Socrates in Hollywood, jewed culture, Jewish appearance, Jewish genetics, judaism, movies, pop culture, Socrates, tv at 2:24 pm | 
Permanent Link
Well, of course it is. Don’t be silly! Speaking of “Sex and the City,” actress Sarah Jessica Parker is its central figure and icon. Is that because:
1. She’s a beautiful woman and her beauty will attract lots of viewers?
2. The heavily-Jewish entertainment industry believes that she has classic Jewish features and wants to use those features to promote and normalize “the Jewish look”? [1].
3. Some other reason?
You decide, readers. Think carefully before answering, because only rotten anti-Semites would choose #2.
[1] in traditional Jewish law, people who are born to Jewish mothers are Jews
18 April, 2010 at 8:24 pm
Didn’t it come out that one of her ancestors had been accused of being a witch in the Salem witch trials?
Hot debate. What do you think?
6 
2
18 April, 2010 at 11:14 pm
She’s always been ugly and I found it ironic that she was chosen as the main character in a series about women and sex. I’m sure being a partial member of the tribe helped her into her position. Anyhow, her face reminds me of a horse, and that isn’t a complement to horses.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
25 
2
19 April, 2010 at 1:08 am
I’d have to agree, SJP is the un-sexiest woman I’ve seen in a long time…Except for this Jewish Gorgon, that is:
http://lindyborer.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/image0251.jpg
************
“……..Speaking of “Sex and the City,” actress Sarah Jessica Parker is its central figure and icon. Is that because:
2. The heavily-Jewish entertainment industry believes that she has classic Jewish features and wants to use those features to promote and normalize “the Jewish look”?
I could not have put it better myself. So, what did I win for choosing correctly? What? One of Sarah Jessica Parker’s used vibrators? I tink I’m goink to plotz!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14 
2
19 April, 2010 at 2:39 am
A few years back I used Google Image to get a picture of Twisted Sister’s Dee Snider. The very first image was of SJP. I’m not joking, this really happened.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
1
19 April, 2010 at 10:04 am
Hey Tim, you think Justice Ginsberg is ugly, wait until you see what the next Jewess Supreme Court nominee looks like!
http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/07ltdov7Oddef/520x.jpg
“She” looks like Ariel Sharon with more hair.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
1
19 April, 2010 at 12:45 pm
Blackshirt, I thought the man in that picture was the unfunny Jew “comedian” Jackie Mason! Wait, you’re telling me that’s not a man?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
2
19 April, 2010 at 1:05 pm
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_EFcE0tzXMrA/R85ZTN7hmKI/AAAAAAAAAGU/jmd3RK_6jD0/s400/JACKIEMASONultjew1.jpg
19 April, 2010 at 1:20 pm
I’d have to agree, SJP is the un-sexiest woman I’ve seen in a long time…Except for this Jewish Gorgon, that is:
http://lindyborer.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/image0251.jpg
************
“……..Speaking of “Sex and the City,” actress Sarah Jessica Parker is its central figure and icon. Is that because:
2. The heavily-Jewish entertainment industry believes that she has classic Jewish features and wants to use those features to promote and normalize “the Jewish look”?
I could not have put it better myself. So, what did I win for choosing correctly? What? One of Sarah Jessica Parker’s used vibrators? I tink I’m goink to plotz!
19 April, 2010 at 2:31 pm
2. The heavily-Jewish entertainment industry believes that she has classic Jewish features and wants to use those features to promote and normalize “the Jewish look”?
Yes, the ‘Chosenites’ have ‘chosen’ SJP as their Jewish posterchild- I managed to find a photo online of one of her Semitic relatives:
http://www.foundshit.com/images/donkey-humor-01.jpg
well, those Donkey genetics just keep ‘generously giving’ to our
world- where oh where would our world be without the likes
of the Donkey-Kikes!
19 April, 2010 at 3:55 pm
SJP beneficiary of nepotism: yes and no. Jewish blood gets your foot in the door, opens doors closed to sub-Jews, but from that point more familiar and ethical forces take some precedence. Unless you’re Jonah Goldberg. Apparently SJP is a joy to work with, shows up on time, knows her lines, etc, has been in show business since childhood.
(The most egregious example of cultural engineering along the lines of “i think this one looks better don’t you” to my mind is the totally dishonest declaration that a circumcised penis “looks more natural” — that is, that something irrevocably altered from its natural state should be prized because of subjective properties that can never be proven. In fact many women don’t like looking at cock period and cannot feel a difference.)
Compare Amy Winehouse: she got her foot in the door, worshipful shall we call them entertainment-sayanim springing up everywhere to simulate adoring fans, but no amount of “advisor” handling and schmoozing and smoothing-over can fix her.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
2
19 April, 2010 at 9:35 pm
Our next Supreme Court justice?
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_EFcE0tzXMrA/R85ZTN7hmKI/AAAAAAAAAGU/jmd3RK_6jD0/s400/JACKIEMASONultjew1.jpg
20 April, 2010 at 10:05 am
The first time I ever laid eyes on Sarah Jessica Parker was when she starred with Bruce Willis in, I think, that old movie about The Last Boyscout. She was new and young in those days – and, in that one movie, I thought she looked pretty good. Didn’t know she was part Jewess, back then.
I think it might have been Tom Metzger who once commented that Jewesses who have some Aryan blood in them can look pretty decent when they are young, but as they age – that toxic and overpowering DNA from Satan’s dick begins to take hold and they get uglier and more Jewy looking, until they finally end up looking like Madeline Albright.
I think Tom’s point might apply to SJP these days.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14 
0
20 April, 2010 at 5:05 pm
SJP is uglier than a can of worms. Skinny creepy kike deluxe. The Jew masters have been working over time to promote her as beautiful. It’s the best they can come up with. The Jews are a desperate hard bent people.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
20 April, 2010 at 11:40 pm
You can’t be too much of a cunt these days in show biz-you have to do a good job and to be fair SJ Parker does. I think she’s unattractive, but then again I wouldn’t give you a plugged nickel to F either Jen Aniston or Angelina Jolie who are suppoed to be the super hotties today.
Some Jewesses aren’t terrible looking women-Betty Bacall Persky wasn’t too shabby in her day, Goldie Hawn and Ellen Greene are fairly pretty, Scarlett Johanssen is probably got the nicest figure we’ve seen since MM and Mansfield.
The bottom line is being a Jew/ess is an undisputed advantage -if- all else is equal, in acting. But in being a media shot caller-it’s essential. The goyim who get in are on a short leash and know it. I don’t care if actors or musicians are Jews-it’s the media moguls who are the issue.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
21 April, 2010 at 12:25 am
I have to agree with much of what you say, Bret. I tend to call it as I see it when it comes to race, and if a Jewess has good abilities or attractiveness, I will give credit where credit is due.
Remember something about the “jewesses” you listed… most if not all of who you listed are half and quarter Jews. Scarlett Johanssen is half Jewish or maybe less considering that most “Jews” these days have quite a bit of White blood in them.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
21 April, 2010 at 5:32 am
I resent how the Jewsmedia has decided for me who the “hottest” chicks are. Of course, they’ve got the mullata Halle Berry on their top ten list, along with Jolie and Anniston. I don’t find any of them attractive.
As I’ve said before, we her in the ‘Kwa get stuck with all the ugly Jewesses like Betty Friedan and Madeline Allbright, while Israel gets those beautiful White-looking Jewesses.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Dm4Xx59f6NM/SdM7lBFDbWI/AAAAAAAACKU/OADzxmYD318/s400/israeli-army-girls-53.jpg
http://media.espace.ch/images/gallery/291196_israel.jpg
http://wonders.blogfars.com/fotofiles/1/99893.jpg
I don’t think that’s fair, dammit.
21 April, 2010 at 5:34 am
I resent how the Jewsmedia has decided for me who the “hottest” chicks are. Of course, they’ve got the mullata Halle Berry on their top ten list, along with Jolie and Anniston. I don’t find any of them attractive.
As I’ve said before, we her in the ‘Kwa get stuck with all the ugly Jewesses like Betty Friedan and Madeline Allbright, while Israel gets those beautiful White-looking Jewesses.
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Dm4Xx59f6NM/SdM7lBFDbWI/AAAAAAAACKU/OADzxmYD318/s400/israeli-army-girls-53.jpg
http://media.espace.ch/images/gallery/291196_israel.jpg
http://wonders.blogfars.com/fotofiles/1/99893.jpg
I don’t think that’s fair, dammit.
21 April, 2010 at 8:08 am
How come all the good looking Jewesses are in Israel and we always get stuck with the Betty Friedans and Madeline Albrights?
http://netwmd.com/blog/wp-content/themes/default/images/miss_israel.jpeg
http://www.jewishjournal.com/images/articles/cov_brener-s_050109-350.jpg
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_Dm4Xx59f6NM/SdM7lBFDbWI/AAAAAAAACKU/OADzxmYD318/s400/israeli-army-girls-53.jpg
http://wonders.blogfars.com/fotofiles/1/99893.jpg
It’s just not fair, I tell you!
21 April, 2010 at 8:10 am
Sorry about the repeat postings, but I’m having trouble logging on for some reason. A Zionist conspiracy, perhaps?
23 April, 2010 at 12:00 am
The Jews in America are most all Ashkenazim, who are a mutt people to begin with. They have ALWAYS let in a certain amount of fresh blood from the surrounding goyische herd, so they fit in. The wholly endogamous Jewish subgroups don’t infiltrate, they stay separate. Those Jews, while unsightly and unpleasant, are no real threat to the surrounding people.
judaism is matrilineal, which in modern terms means that Jews perceive the essense of Jewishness (as opposed to Judaism) to lie within the mitochondrial DNA. Oliver (late in his career,cf. The Jewish Strategy )and many others point this out. The role of outmarrying Jewesses vs. the males then takes on high significance.
This is critical.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
0
29 April, 2010 at 9:39 pm
thank you all for the great work..
I will continue to support vnn with whatever I can god bless…
30 April, 2010 at 10:53 pm
It’s an open-and-shut case of “The Emperor’s New Clothes” – total chutzpah. “Oy, THIS is the sexiest woman in America!”…and she’s a dog-faced jew! And they keep pushing this rank lie for years! Jews don’t quit. Years from now, a poll of “Hollywood’s Top Ten Beauties” will come out, with Elizabeth Taylor, Marilyn Monroe, etc. etc. on the list. But on top the jews will put SJP, one of the ugliest public women in American history by any standard. “Oy, the public has spoken. Ugly jewesses are the best to mate with!”
Anyone who thinks SJP is – or ever was – attractive needs to have his eyes removed, since he’s already blind.
And I laugh at the idiocy about her being “a joy to work with.” Like Dave Chappelle is brilliant, right? “Jew” and “joy” don’t belong in the same sentence. Maybe the batting average of other kikes in the industry is so appallingly low that a jew who knows her lines (which she is, after all, paid vastly more money to do than any of us is paid for vastly more work) is better by comparison. But “joy” – and a jew? I’ve only heard jews speak this way of jews.
1 May, 2010 at 12:55 am
“I’ve only heard jews speak this way of jews.”
That’s a good giveaway. Jewish critics ALL love the work of other Jews. When Jews speak too praisingly of someone, the red flags go up.
1 May, 2010 at 1:02 am
Btw, not to criticize, but the great beauties you mentioned above (Monroe, Taylor) were converts to Judaism, and married (mostly) Jewish husbands.
Practically the only way to success in Hollywood, for a shicksa anyway, is to be born a Jew, convert to a Jew, or marry a Jew.
There were a few exceptions who slipped through: Hepburn, Garbo.
But generally, it was run as a family business, closed to outsiders.
1 May, 2010 at 1:04 am
As for the exceptions, they probably had Jewish agents — at the least. And probably they had bedded the studio executives.
1 May, 2010 at 11:54 pm
Yes, I don’t regard Taylor and Monroe as great. Just throwing the usual names out there as filler in order to speed to my point. Of course, no real greats would make such a list. In general, Hollywood actresses have always been either jews or whores for jews. When I saw “greats” I am again stretching it – none of these women are admirable. (Film acting is often created by the editor, contra the public, which is ignorant of the work of editors or writers or directors and which assumes that talented “stars” of a movie are making it up as they go along.) (As long as you have the proper vocal chords, have symmetrical features, can train yourself not to blink when on camera, and can memorize a few simple lines and movements, you, too, can be “great” “talented” “admirable” actor, depending on the script and director.) (Admirable is curing a disease or identifying a new type of fungus. Actors are not admirable, though they can be made to seem impressive.)
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
25 May, 2010 at 7:11 pm
She’s pulling it off very well
23 June, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Look at Judy Garland, able to pass as a mid-western farm girl then at some point an ugly gene went off, same with her daughter. Parker was able to pass after a nose job, look at her in Footloose. I thought Rachael Weiss was pretty, but she seems like another person in the Mummy sequel. How they were able to make Ingrid Bergman look like the hideous Golda Meir I’ll never comprehend.