23 April, 2010
Open Thread
Posted by Socrates in open threads, Socrates at 9:16 pm | 
Permanent Link
Post whatever you want…
Posted by Socrates in open threads, Socrates at 9:16 pm |
Permanent Link
Similar posts:
- 01/11/11 Open Thread 95% similar
- 06/11/10 Open Thread 95% similar
- 01/01/10 Open Thread 95% similar
- 01/12/10 Open Thread 95% similar
- 01/29/10 Open Thread 95% similar
158 Responses to “Open Thread”
23 April, 2010 at 9:25 pm
RIP Melcur
Sure he was crazy as hell but his life was a tragedy nonetheless.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
2
23 April, 2010 at 9:45 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
1 
12
23 April, 2010 at 10:29 pm
Glenn Miller made the Economist:
http://www.economist.com/world/united-states/displaystory.cfm?story_id=15911528
23 April, 2010 at 10:50 pm
It was 40 years ago that The Beatles broke up. Why did John Lennon have to leave his beautiful White wife for that fugly, no-talent Jap?
Hero of the Week: Governor Jan Brewer! All the decent White people in AZ need to publicly support the Governor’s anti-Greaser law and stand up to those noisy, obnoxious Spic mobs.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
17 
1
24 April, 2010 at 12:01 am
“Why did John Lennon have to leave his beautiful White wife for that fugly, no-talent Jap?”
Easy to answer. White women, as they behave with Christian upbringing, have been brainwashed to be modest, believe it’s a virtue to be sexually dull. That cunning Asian woman Yoko knew to make good sex, she knew how to win and gain by it. Thus, when she intruded into Lennon’s life, his wife didn’t beat her in in her own game, but simply left him in fury and jealousy.
I have seen the same thing happen in my neighbourhood.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18 
3
24 April, 2010 at 12:31 am
It’s time to take the country back.
http://www.KeepTheTruthAlive.com
24 April, 2010 at 1:13 am
White female Job seeker, 21, with 3 A-levels and 10 GCSEs, kills herself after she was rejected for 200 jobs
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1267953/Job-seeker-Vicky-Harrison-commits-suicide-rejected-200-jobs.html#ixzz0lzlWXt1f
24 April, 2010 at 2:06 am
What a terrible, terrible story about that poor unfortunate White girl who couldn’t find a friggin’ job….Extremely disturbing and tragic. Do you think an unemployed shebooness or spic-arina would get depressed and kill herself over not finding a job? No, she would just get pregnant for the fifth or sixth time and wait for a larger welfare check to come in the mail.
One less sweet, beautiful young White woman in the world. Thanks, Jews, for demanding unlimited 3rd World immigration into the UK so the few reamining jobs there can be gobbled up by some invading wog, nigger or arab. And thanks for fucking up the global economy to the point where even a beautiful, college-educated young White woman like Miss Harrison can’t find a job.
You won’t get away with this.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
1
24 April, 2010 at 2:27 am
Quote:
RIP Melcur
Sure he was crazy as hell but his life was a tragedy nonetheless.
What’s happened?????
Hot debate. What do you think?
9 
5
24 April, 2010 at 2:32 am
Sorry scrub that last comment, I just saw the thread on the forum.
Another member of the “white movement” bites the dust. There’s been a hell of a lot of that lately.
Well, despite everything, Melcur was a very smart guy and a damn good essay writer.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
4
24 April, 2010 at 3:01 am
Yoko Ono is Japanese. Before I was racially conscious I could have and did-frequently-boff Japanese girls.
But never old and ugly Japanese girls with defective personalities by any standards, theirs or ours. Ono is about the last female of any race I’d want to hook up with. She’s a cunt, pure and simple.
Lennon was off his rocker.
Robert Griffin has an essay on this subject. Look it up, worht a read. I met May Pang (yes, another ollie, a Chinese) a few years back and she was certainly a pleasant sort. Nothing like Yoko. I haven’t met Yoko but we have mutual acquaintences, who tell me she’s every bit the cunt today as always. Even Chrissie Hynde has a better personality, they say.
24 April, 2010 at 5:44 am
Funny, out of all the cute little Jap girls that Lennon could have had (if he was so into the Oriental thing), he had to get an old, fugly one?
However, I’ll give Yoko Ono credit for doing a good job on the backup vocals for The Beatles’ songs “Birthday” and “Revolution No.9″, both from The White Album. And it was interesting to hear her “sing” on the Rolling Stones’ “Rock and Roll Circus” TV special. But to think Lennon abandoned Cynthia for her? Off his rocker, indeed.
24 April, 2010 at 5:45 am
Hello? Is this thing on?
24 April, 2010 at 5:48 am
I’m not exactly a Yoko Ono fan, but I will give her credit for doing a good job with the backing vocals on The Beatles’ songs “Birthday” and “Revolution No. 9″, both from The White Album. And it was interesting to hear her “sing” on that Rolling Stones “Rock and Roll Circus” TV special.
24 April, 2010 at 5:49 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
0 
5
24 April, 2010 at 7:58 am
John Lennon was inscrutible.
Maybe he had a small portion of Asian DNA?
Inscrutible Englishmen attract those masters of inscrutibility, the Asians.
An inscrutible person like Oko can always best a scrutible person like Cynthia.
Presently, Robin Gibb of the Bee Gees has also been inscrutibilized–he has impregnated his Asian housekeeper, half his age.
Hot debate. What do you think?
7 
6
24 April, 2010 at 9:28 am
While the music of the Beatles was far superior to the average for the 1960′s, there were a lot of innuendos to encourage drug taking, plus the long hair and all the warm and fuzzy love and peace crap contributed greatly to the feminization of the White young men in those days. What we need today is real Aryan White men who will inspire a new music that will spark the coming Revolution. The REAL Revolution.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
1
24 April, 2010 at 10:14 am
Go Jim! Looks like the Brits need a revolution to purge the working non-whites in their country, especially the jews and the crypto-jews who are working towards a genocide upon the Whites.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
1
24 April, 2010 at 10:28 am
Wasn’t Ono very masculine and dominate? She never let herself smile like a woman in public for example… What do they say about Homosexual men? Their great dream is to find a dominate woman who will wear the pants in the family. He’s supposed to be this sensitive artist and she can use her ice cold jap personality to fight it out over the residuals with the record company.
Maybe Lennon was a latent Homo? A lot can be explained that way when you find tall white men with weird minority women who are aggressive. Has nothing to do with sex excitment unless your talking about strapons. I can see her fucking Lennon with one. Should his trad. white wife do that? Just divorce him and find somebody normal.
24 April, 2010 at 11:37 am
@Jim
“plus the long hair and all the warm and fuzzy love and peace crap contributed greatly to the feminization of the White young men in those days. ”
Correct me if I’m wrong, but haven’t most White men had long hair throughout history? I don’t see how it is necessarily a ‘hippy’ thing even though they hijacked it.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
2
24 April, 2010 at 11:54 am
It seems to me that when a Japanese marries a non-Japanese, they are disowned by their families.
I personally know of two such instances.
24 April, 2010 at 12:10 pm
I have long hair and like it. Wanna fight about it? lol.
Tchaikovsky was purported to be a homosexual.Does that make his music any less appealing?Not to me. I understand there is a difference between him and the Beatles,not only in quality of music,but also in the fact that that Tchaikovsky didn’t have any blatant pro homo/hippy information in his music.I still Like the Beatles,I just don’t take their lyrics seriously.
24 April, 2010 at 12:24 pm
Why did John Lennon have to leave his beautiful White wife for that fugly, no-talent Jap?”
Easy to answer. White women, as they behave with Christian upbringing, have been brainwashed to be modest, believe it’s a virtue to be sexually dull. That cunning Asian woman Yoko knew to make good sex..
Sex with Yoko? That sounds like really stretching the boundaries, eh? Sorry, John.
24 April, 2010 at 12:57 pm
Hey, Rounder? I don’t know your email address, but I thought of something that I wanted to suggest to you that I think would be a great idea.
Remember that long article that you wrote about Cowardice is the New White Man’s Strategy? I just recently finished reading it, and except for your totally incorrect repetition of the lie about 19 Arabs doing 9-11 – it was Israel and the Mossad that pulled that off, and Dr. Alan Sabrosky – who spent over 5 years at the Army War College has confirmed this and reports that high ranking military people are aware of it – aside from that error, I was impressed with the article because it was almost dead on the mark.
Here’s my idea. Can you record an audio of that same article? Make it into an mp3 that we can download from VNN and we can burn copies of it on CD-Rs and pass them around. Or, if you want to record it and offer a copy for $10 in order to raise money for VNN and Alex Linder’s website, that’s fine, too.
If you do, please modify that part about blaming the Arabs for 9-11 and identify the real perpetrators. Post a note on VNN when it’s available for either download or purchase.
thanks, Glenn!
24 April, 2010 at 1:42 pm
I have a question for the management:
On the Hitler thread I have a post that is “hidden due to low comment rating” which is like 16, dislike 22. Now how is that a “low comment rating? I can understand if it was like 5 like and 22 dislike, but the ratio in question is pretty damn close.
Not that I’m insulted or anything, but it just seems a little unfair. With that said, I think by hiding a post you only make it more tempting to view it- I know that is how it works for me.
Hot debate. What do you think?
8 
11
24 April, 2010 at 4:46 pm
RIP Melcur.
I liked him and thought he wrote well. He certainly had bill white’s number. Many here at VNN seem to be rejoicing …. well whatever makes you happy.
24 April, 2010 at 4:48 pm
Seems to calc absolute diff, not ratios. Ratios in to-day’s context are too hard to understand. Computers are too lazy to calculate them.
24 April, 2010 at 4:58 pm
I’m pissed of two really good posts i put in the Hitler Birthday section somehow got censored.That is Uncool and jew-type behavior.What–I like Putin-so what!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
1
24 April, 2010 at 5:07 pm
I’m with you, Red Skull. I have had several posts “disappear” and never get posted. In the past Socrates said he had nothing to do with that. There doesn’t seem to be a rhyme or reason to it, although I do notice that if my post is just two paragraphs it is more likely to never show up.
24 April, 2010 at 5:47 pm
I very seriously doubt Lennon had hot sex with Ono. Pang probably, Ono no way. They did have a kid so there was some, but I doubt it was “hot”.
Japanese girls like to lay there still and giggle. You have to work at getting them to work it. Usually they are tight and have musculature (doing their business in the benjo ditch means squatting) and they are appreciative if you get them off. I guess the Japanese men are pretty selfish, I know they are not well endowed at all. The Japanese rubbers are very tight on me and I’m just average sized (for Whites).
Believe me, sex with White women is ultimately much more rewarding. The Japanese girls ate ultimately not emotionally connected to sex, except to enjoy an orgasm like anyone else. It doesn’t have a deep significance for them. It’s interesting to note that abortion is very common in Japan and no one bats an eye. The girls have no regret at all, their parents don’t care either. They are a different people foundationally and biologically, and although they are admirable in many ways their sense of life has to be incompatible with ours, and it is.
Hot debate. What do you think?
7 
4
24 April, 2010 at 7:22 pm
I stand corrected!All of my posts on the Fuhrer Thread made it.Hail VNN!Although they didn’t appear right away.Why do some comments get moderated and others not?
24 April, 2010 at 7:40 pm
“Why did John Lennon have to leave his beautiful White wife for that fugly, no-talent Jap?”
——————
Because it was “the thing to do”.
White was out, exotic was “in”. Everything that was non-white was perceived as better.
It might also be true as others said about the uninhibited sex. Anothing thing: she was very rich and a great one for managing money. I have read that her family is/was the Rothschilds of Japan. (Don’t know how true that is, but so I’ve read.)
24 April, 2010 at 8:53 pm
Disturbing when a pretty White 21 year old college grad can’t find a job, even after 200 applications. So depressed she takes her own life, depriving the world of her future off spring. Byron Jost off’s himself in a drug filled bout of depression, dying alone on the floor of a skanky room above a bar.
There is something wrong, demoralization, loss of hope maybe part of the answer. This society is putrid and degenerate, sick to the max. It is a society well past it’s sell-by-date. It is a society that must be smashed, destroyed and replaced. If only for the survival of our own young people, who are on the point of despair.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
0
25 April, 2010 at 12:02 am
Lennon’s fascination with Ono was very strange. It’s one thing to love your wife, but to bring her everywhere you go all the time? Did he drop too much acid? Was it a result of too much fame too early ruining his common sense?
Oriental women are very cunning and manipulative. And once they are in a postion of power, they are cold-blooded as hell. Too bad Cynthia Lennon didn’t whack Ono over the head with a frying pan when she had the chance. Like a previous poster said, White women have become too Christianized.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
1
25 April, 2010 at 1:34 am
“Sex with Yoko? That sounds like really stretching the boundaries, eh? Sorry, John.”
She put him under and he apparently enjoyed it. Decadent whimps were made role models for a whole generation. The Beatles have been managed and manipulated by Jews. Which should assist us to judge their worth (artistic and otherwise) for the white race.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
1
25 April, 2010 at 3:35 am
Arminius, I think we can enjoy the artistic fruits of others without having to agree with their politics. For example, we can listen to the music of Prokofiev and Shostakovich without being Reds. And we can watch movies starring Robert Redford and Tom Hanks without being limousene liberals like they are. Likewise, we can listen to the White Album and Revolver without having manipulative Japanese wives or returning our MBE awards.
25 April, 2010 at 3:38 am
But you’re right about The Beatles having been controlled by Jews from start to finish. Brain Epstein, Phil Spector, Allan Klein and I don’t know how many other Hebes all took their pound of flesh from that band.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
0
25 April, 2010 at 3:39 am
I meant to write BRIAN Epstein, not Brain Epstein.
25 April, 2010 at 8:01 am
Say what you want to about the non-violence of Christian women, but they know that you are supposed to save it for their one and only.
Whether many do, is another question.
But I think that even the best of the pagans knew (and know) that, and counseled their women accordingly.
In addition, a pagan woman would have been more likely to have taken a frying pan to Yono’s head.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
1
25 April, 2010 at 8:02 am
Enlish grammar correction for my previous post:
” . . . they know that THEY are supposed to save it for their one and only.”
25 April, 2010 at 8:10 am
“Enlish grammar correction for my previous post:”
Enlish grammar? Que?
25 April, 2010 at 8:37 am
Oh-oh, here comes “Sex and the City 2″, so be on the lookout for lots of heavily airbrushed publicity photos of the frizzy-haired, cross-eyed, mule-faced Jewess SJ Parker!!!
25 April, 2010 at 9:30 am
Long hair is a touchy subject among White Nationalists. In recent times, up until the 1960′s long hair on men was definitely a no no. I think a clean cut appearance or even a skin head appearance looks far more masculine. Some super masculine types like Bikers may be able to get away with it, but on the average White guy it looks effemminate. It has too many associations with the hippie era and the decade of the White Man’s emasculation.
25 April, 2010 at 9:59 am
4/24/2010 3:56:00 PM
White woman’s Purse stolen from two negro mischief makers’ running vehicle
By Andrei Yustschinsky
VERDE VILLAGES, ARIZONA – Yavapai County Sheriff’s deputies were called to a vehicle burglary Wednesday evening, in the 2300 block of Buckboard Trail in Verde Village #4. Thanks to vigilant White neighbors and using legwork, police tracked the thieves and recovered the valuables.
Neighbors told deputies they had seen two negro suspects taking a purse from a car parked on Buckboard Trail. The White vehicle owner had left the car running with her purse on the front seat while she was inside the home.
The alert neighbor said the negro suspects were a black male, wearing baggy SEAN JOHN™ pants and turquoise-colored shoes, and his female companion. The neighbor, victim and a friend searched the area and determining the general direction of the suspects’ flight and advised the Sheriff’s dispatcher.
Neighbors also notified arriving deputies that the suspects were seen trying to hide in some bushes near Silver Leaf Trail and Diablo Drive. Then another White witness saw the negro suspects jump over her back yard fence into a neighbor’s yard. Following those leads, deputies nabbed the suspects at a home in the 4600 block of Diablo Drive.
The negro male was identified as 21-year-old Korey Leatherwood of Phoenix and his companion, 16-year-old negress Ianelli Cuellar of Scottsdale. Leatherwood, who has family living on Diablo Drive, has an outstanding probation violation warrant from Maricopa County.
Negress Cuellar was listed as a runaway juvenile by Scottsdale Police. She admitted her allegedly involvement with Leatherwood in the vehicle burglary.
Cash, positively identified as that taken from the victim’s purse, was found in Cuellar’s purse. Deputies backtracked and found the victim’s purse and wallet in a wash near the pond on Del Rio Drive.
All of the White victim’s belongings were accounted for and returned.
Both negro suspects were charged with burglary and theft. Leatherwood was also charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor. He was booked at the Camp Verde jail. Cuellar was taken to the Yavapai County Juvenile Detention Center in Prescott.
Andrei Yustschinsky reporting….
25 April, 2010 at 1:00 pm
wimps. although “whimps” is funnier.
25 April, 2010 at 1:48 pm
Blackshirt Says:
“I have a question for the management:
On the Hitler thread I have a post that is “hidden due to low comment rating” which is like 16, dislike 22. Now how is that a “low comment rating? I can understand if it was like 5 like and 22 dislike, but the ratio in question is pretty damn close.
Not that I’m insulted or anything, but it just seems a little unfair. With that said, I think by hiding a post you only make it more tempting to view it- I know that is how it works for me.”
As far as I know, it [the comment ratings feature] comes standard with the new software upgrade. It seems automatic.
25 April, 2010 at 1:52 pm
The Red Skull Says:
“I’m pissed of two really good posts i put in the Hitler Birthday section somehow got censored.That is Uncool and jew-type behavior.What–I like Putin-so what!”
VNN has a spam filter. Sometimes comments get blocked by it.
25 April, 2010 at 4:01 pm
“The Red Skull Says:
“I’m pissed of two really good posts i put in the Hitler Birthday section somehow got censored.That is Uncool and jew-type behavior.What–I like Putin-so what!”
VNN has a spam filter. Sometimes comments get blocked by it.”
What I’d like to know is WHY the spam filter makes so many posts disappear, and others it allows through? How does a computer tell whether a post is spam or not anyway? Does it get triggered by certain words? Does putting a link in the post trigger it?
This is just speculation, but is the management just deleting posts they don’t like? Maybe the “spam filter” doesn’t even exist? And if the spam filter is as unpredictable as Socrates says and it makes posts disappear into the nothingness of cyberspace, why is the management using such a flawed program?
I’m not trying to be combative, I’m genuinely interested in why some posts disappear, and others make it through.
25 April, 2010 at 4:43 pm
Jim Says: “Long hair is a touchy subject among White Nationalists. … on the average White guy it looks effemminate. It has too many associations with the hippie era and the decade of the White Man’s emasculation.”
………………………………..
I’m with Jim on this. Sorry. That’s how it is. A couple of my friends are touchy about their hair too, so I avoid it, for them; but as far as I’m concerned, long hair looks better on a woman — NOT on a man.
Question: WHY, oh why, would a man want long flowing tresses, anyway? What satisfaction does he get from it? Is there a psychological need to hide behind something? To feel protected? I just don’t get it.
25 April, 2010 at 4:45 pm
Elie Wiesel doesn’t have a tattoo –
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr8_JaKde2Q
25 April, 2010 at 6:06 pm
La grammaire de l’Anglais, Monsieur McVert!
Ha, Ha! Bon!
25 April, 2010 at 6:13 pm
I often keep my hair long,sometimes i cut it very short. Depends on the season,winter/summer. If you had bitchin blond hair like me you might do the same. When I was single the chicks used to really dig it!
25 April, 2010 at 6:25 pm
Someone else posted this on VNN a while back,but it’s so good I think I’ll re-post it here!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqrBHDUInn8&playnext_from=TL&videos=WKsUIDgxdp4
25 April, 2010 at 9:57 pm
Le grammaire? C’est la grammaire, mon ami.
25 April, 2010 at 10:08 pm
“When I was single the chicks used to really dig it!”
I would have thought it would scare them away (unless they’re really lesbians at heart)! What kind of a woman would want a man whose hair was longer then hers?
There was a time when long hair would have gotten a man hooted at in the street and beaten up.
I had a friend in high school who started wearing his long. It really looked awful. I sometimes suggested if i could take a scissors and just take a few chops at it, just to trim it a little. NO, no, no! He was paranoid about anyone touching his precious hair. He was EXTREMELY defensive about it. There was definitely something psychological going on there. I think he hid from the world behind it. It was his protection from reality. He used to refer to Samson (of the Bible) losing his strength when his hair was cut …. and he really seemed to mean it. What a kink he turned out to be!
25 April, 2010 at 10:10 pm
Than, not then. Oops, my “grammaire”! I know someone will catch that.
(Why do mistakes always show up when they’re printed???)
25 April, 2010 at 10:37 pm
If a guy has a full head of hair, then why not grow it out, at least for a while, just to see how it looks? But if a guy is losing his hair and tries to compensate for that with combovers or “skullets”, then it looks really bad.
**********
“There was a time when long hair would have gotten a man hooted at in the street and beaten up.”
Ein’s statement reminds me of that scene in Easy Rider, where Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda go into that redneck cafe in Louisiana and are greeted with threats and insults. Or Alice’s Restaurant, where Arlo Guthrie gets harassed by some rednecks in a bar for his long hair. It took guts for hippies to fly their freak flag in those small southern towns back then. But now, you see a lot of good ol’ boys with long hair and beards!
25 April, 2010 at 11:33 pm
Ein,that’s really funny. I was actually going to make a sampson joke lol. I decided against it. Like I said,call me the oddball racist because that’s what I am. All of my friends keep they’re heads shaved. I am the freak.
I often throw people off but think it’s funny. I understand where you are coming from,I just think back to a time before the clean cut super tidy appearance,which I highly respect,it just isn’t me.I live in Montana,work outdoors year round,put up with whether extremes,I don’t have time to shave in the morning with my old house,three kids and job to keep in line.Nor do I care to.
25 April, 2010 at 11:45 pm
P.S My truck is bigger than yours.
26 April, 2010 at 12:47 am
oops,showing my roots nigga,*Weather
26 April, 2010 at 5:46 am
A few words about the 40th anniversary of Earth Day…What a crock of shit.
26 April, 2010 at 8:36 am
Mais j’ai dit “la grammaire” , pas “le grammaire” mon ami Ein-Jean!
26 April, 2010 at 8:37 am
Jew Sarkozy: Europe is at Israel’s side because it took oath after WWII to give (steal) the Palestinian State to the Jewish people
By: Andrei Yustschinsky, Mideast Affairs Editor
PARIS (Associated Pricks)—”French” (Hungarian Jew) president Nicolas Sarkozy said Thursday that “Europe is at Israel’s side because it took oath after WWII to give (steal) a Palestinian State to the Jewish people so long martyrised”, after meeting at the Elysee Palace in Paris with his Israeli counterpart Shimon Peres.
The two kosher douchebags discussed the issue of tougher sanctions against Iran, ways to relaunch the Mideast “peace process” and efforts to secure the release of abducted Israeli mercenary Gilad Shalit, who has also “French” citizenship.
Sarkozy “stressed” that there is no other solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict aside from negotiations.
The establishment of a democratic, viable and modern Palestinian state is a condition for Israel’s security and only Israel’s security, the cripto-Jew said.
On Iran, the “French” president said that Tehran was conducting itself in an “intolerable manner,” adding that France is committed to harsh sanctions in order to curb the “Iranian atomic threat”.
Associated Pricks’ Andrei Yustschinsky reporting from the Eiffel Tower, Champ de Mars in Paris, France……
26 April, 2010 at 11:04 am
Blackshirt Says:
“What I’d like to know is WHY the spam filter makes so many posts disappear, and others it allows through? How does a computer tell whether a post is spam or not anyway? Does it get triggered by certain words? Does putting a link in the post trigger it?
This is just speculation, but is the management just deleting posts they don’t like? Maybe the “spam filter” doesn’t even exist? And if the spam filter is as unpredictable as Socrates says and it makes posts disappear into the nothingness of cyberspace, why is the management using such a flawed program?”
Riigghhtt, Blackshirt, it’s all just a big plot to censor your comments. I knew we couldn’t fool you!
The spam filter doesn’t delete posts. It quarantines them. However, it makes it more likely that a comment will be flushed into cyberspace when the spam folder is emptied, especially if it has 50 messages in it.
26 April, 2010 at 3:23 pm
Socrates, you are dancing around the question I asked. Could you please answer my question(s)?
In particular I’d like these questions addressed: “What I’d like to know is WHY the spam filter makes so many posts disappear, and others it allows through? How does a computer tell whether a post is spam or not anyway? Does it get triggered by certain words? Does putting a link in the post trigger it?”
26 April, 2010 at 3:43 pm
Blackshirt: I don’t know. The spam issue seems to hinge on certain words/phrases/links, which are automatically blocked. Most legit comments make it through, however. The spam filter is needed, otherwise we would have about 75 spam comments per day in the comments section.
26 April, 2010 at 6:28 pm
Blackshirt, just go inside the Spam Filter Computer and pull out all its memory banks, like when astronaut Dave Bowman disconnected HAL 9000.
“Stop, Blackshirt. I’m afraid.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukeHdiszZmE
26 April, 2010 at 6:48 pm
Thanks for your response, Socrates.
26 April, 2010 at 8:13 pm
Socrates–Thanx for that explanation!Hey everyone-I just read a really depressing but utterly truthful article on the Economy called “America’s Master Class” by stewart dougherty on kitko.com.He doesn’t mention the tribe by name,but WE ALL KNOW WHO THEY ARE.Hope you have some Gold and are ready for a serious Shit-Storm.As i said,its depressing,but if you have the courage to read it,you can only resign yourself to the Karmic Fate that awaits this Nation.–Ps-I only plug an article when i feel every reader (and VNN Staff) can benefit from an article,not just a few-It is a very well written and easily absorbed article,but it makes clear the impending financial doom coming.Enjoy!
26 April, 2010 at 8:32 pm
I don’t like long hair on a man. I grew my hair out long a few years ago and found it to be too much of a hassle to deal with. I like to be able roll out of bed and not spend much time dealing with my hair like a broad. With easy access to clippers and scissors there is no need for a man to have long hair today, unless he likes the dong. It also puts you at a disadvantage if you get in a fight, especially with a nigger, who love to fight dirty. Long hair also comes with the stigma of being the hair style of choice for douche bag hippies, men past thirty look really stupid with long hair.
26 April, 2010 at 10:51 pm
Well, Mickey Roarke looks good with long hair and he’s around 50. But he’s had waaay too much plastic surgery. And what about Ben Franklin? Or Isaac Newton? They were rocking their long hair centuries before The Beatles.
26 April, 2010 at 11:25 pm
The Vikings and Ancient Germans and Celts all wore their hair long,as a sign of masculine virility and youth,and lack of scissors.Everyone was scared shitless of them too.Long hair harkens back to our primitive,masculine,”barbarian” roots.The Only Nazi with a “bald head” was Julius Striecher=Jew Hater #1-according to him-and hung at Nuremberg for exposing the Jew.How about the Duke of MarlBorough,Prince Eugene,and Marshall Villars???NOW there’s some Big Hair!
26 April, 2010 at 11:27 pm
In my opinion, Lennon made a horrible mistake by hooking up with Yoko. As I recall, he treated Cynthia pretty shabbily. I still really like a lot of his music though.
27 April, 2010 at 12:21 am
Long hair, short hair, no hair. That is the least of our problems now. Our main concern should be in trying to alert our jaded and hypnotized White brothers and sisters to the dangers of the current crisis facing our race, After the jews get through finiishing off our race, there won’t be a single human left with blond hair, long or otherwise.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
27 April, 2010 at 12:31 am
I don’t think long hair makes a guy masculine, Jesus the Jew, one of the biggest faggots known to mankind had long hair, nuff said. The douchey pro wrestlers like Hulk Hogan and Randy Savage had flowing locks too. Can’t forget about that super sexy nigger Prince either. LOL
27 April, 2010 at 8:06 am
Vigo the Carpathian had long hair:
http://ghostbusters.wikia.com/wiki/Vigo
27 April, 2010 at 8:58 am
Just as the 1960′s when long hair on males was a media-made fashion statement, now the Hoosier State is making a media-made multicultural fashion statement.
As for fashionable Valparaiso, i think the city would be better off if they would bring in a couple hundred little Haitian orphans & for good measure, a couple hundred Somalis with HIV….Andrei’s Ghost
Conference examines ways to make newcomers to Indiana welcome, expose Hoosiers to cultural diversity
Making cultural connections
By Dan Carden – dan.carden@nwi.com, (317) 637-9078 | Posted: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 12:05 am
INDIANAPOLIS | Jesse Harper’s telephone at the Valparaiso International Center rang a lot Friday.
On the other end were people wanting to know what they could do after Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signed into law the nation’s toughest restrictions on illegal immigration.
Educate yourselves and get involved, Harper told the callers.
“It sort of lights a fire, and it reminds people they are a part of a larger community and this affects them,” he said.
Unlike Arizona, where vandalism and violence have followed enactment of the new law that allows police to demand proof of citizenship from any person suspected of being in the United States illegally, more than 150 representatives of ethic groups in Indiana came together in peace Monday for the second Indiana Multiethnic Conference.
During a daylong series of large group lectures and small group workshops, participants learned new techniques to better assist newcomers to Indiana and how to effectively connect Hoosiers with people from other cultures and backgrounds.
That’s what the Valparaiso International Center tries to do on a daily basis, said Harper, a conference speaker. The center hosts cultural and social events, holds classes for new language learners and works to spread awareness throughout the region of different cultural practices.
“There really is a need for a place like this to help people acclimate and fulfill the needs of people in the community to meet people from other cultures,” Harper said.
According to the National League of Cities, Chicago is a “continuous” immigrant destination, while Indianapolis is considered an “emerging” destination for new immigrants. More than 100,000 recent immigrants, most of Hispanic origin, call Northwest Indiana home.
Better cultural awareness and respect for cultural diversity are vital to improving Indiana’s economy and job market (cheap labor) and necessary to make Indiana a better state, Gov. Mitch Daniels (sellout whore) said at the conference.
“Just as businesses have learned they’ll be stronger, smarter, more successful in their purpose (for cheap mestizo labor) if they pull together — diversify as we say — their work forces and their leadership and their outlook, so, too, will we be that kind of state,” Daniels said. “A better, freer, fairer, more prosperous Indiana achieved through the merger of talented people of every possible description.”
27 April, 2010 at 2:19 pm
So we’ve covered long hair, now what does everyone think about facial hair? I tend to keep some facial hair, and keep it well groomed. I hate the walrus type moustaches and those thin spic beards.
27 April, 2010 at 2:41 pm
I can see both sides of the hair or no hair debate. It is interesting to note that the 20th century’s short hair obsession really got going during WWI. And the short hair phenomena can be traced back to one particular piece of military equipment- the gas mask.
When gas became widespread as a weapon of war, the gas mask became an essential piece of protection. In order to get a good seal on the gas mask, soldiers were required to trim the hair on the sides of the head short, and to not have any facial hair that might effect the seal. The look caught on for civilians, and hence you have the short hair on the sides look for most of the 20th century. But prior to WWI it was perfectly ok for a man to grow his hair long, and it was especially popular around the time of the Civil War. General Armstrong Custer comes to mind, but even in the old west you had Wild Bill Hickok and Buffalo Bill who had long hair.
27 April, 2010 at 5:46 pm
“…and lack of scissors”
[Red Skull]
……………………………..
Yeah, I suspect that played a large part of it. Those old Celts & Vikings just didn’t have ‘em.
But weren’t the Romans clean-shaved and short-haired? Shows what civilization can do for ya. They won their wars too.
As for Ben Franklin, Jefferson, et al — well that was the style of the times, and we’ve never seen them any other way — so it just seems natural. For THEM!
And for Abe Lincoln’s time — the facial hair styles back then, in some cases were downright outlandish!
For a number of years I had a friend, a policeman, who had a long ponytail. You wouldn’t have known it. He ALWAYS kept it rolled up tightly in a bun in back, and always inside his cap, so it was inconspicuous. The first time, after already knowing him several years, that I saw him with his hair all down (an extremely rare instance), I didn’t recognize him! I thought it was his sister. But I kept my opinions to myself. He had once, when younger, wanted to be a guitarist, rock musician, biker, all that stuff, and never fully gave up the fantasy. On weekends he would go off to bikers’ rallies… well, whatever bikers do. According to what he told me, when he was a rookie, he had actually caught a lot of flak from the other cops because of his long hair, which is why he kept it well hidden. There was a very simple solution to that little problem: just get rid of it! But no, he wouldn’t even consider that. He was very attached to his hair. There was something extremely defensive and protective about that –just as there had been with my old friend from high school days. No matter what price it cost them, they wouldn’t give it up! Definitely something psychological there. I can’t explain it.
As Wilton said above, it doesn’t look good on guys over thirty. Of course, when you’re built like Hulk Hogan, nobody’s going to make fun of you — no matter what they may think. My best friend at present has a wispy ponytail (which he generally keeps rolled up). And he’s protective about it too! Out of respect for him, I never breathe a word. (I know it wouldn’t do any good anyway.) But — just between us here — I really wish he’d get if cut off. He’s over 30 and looks like an outdated hippy who hasn’t caught up with the times. But I wouldn’t hurt his feelings, so I shut up and say nothing. [Shhh! Just between us!]
Regarding Wilton’s question about facial hair — hair and hair care can be a nuisance, no matter what you do with it. I started wearing a moustache in order to cut down the daily bother of shaving. But it turned out that a moustache needs regular care too, special scissors and electric trimmer; a scraggly moustache can look awful. No way around it. It’s still work.
When my father approached the end of his life, he was ill and wanted to simplify life as much as possible. So he had all his hair cut off, and went bald. End of problem! In the same vein, he was & sick tired of cutting grass — but my mother put her foot down when he suggested paving the lawn! No way would she have that.
27 April, 2010 at 5:57 pm
Well trimmed beards and mustaches look good on most White men. I have never seen a nigger though, who didn’t look like shit with a beard and long hair.
27 April, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Many of the Indo-Aryan sages of India had long hair: Patanjali, Aurobindo, Yogananda.
The reason is this: Hair symbolizes thoughts. Long hair is free and untamed. The thoughts of the Holy Ones are free and untamed. That which is united to the One must necessarily have thoughts that are unlimited; therefore the hair, symbolizing creative thought, is unlimited.
That is why one finds, in repressive and controlling thought-systems, short hair on men. Not necessarily on the leaders, but on the followers. This is a generalization, and depends on other circumstances, such as culture, circumstances and even technology.
Of course, certain sages have recognized that an affection for long hair is an attachment which can hinder them, so, if it is indeed an attachment, the hair must go!
Long hair is like certain drugs–not everyone should engage in this practice. Certain artists, creative people, intellectuals, spiritual adepts–it may be right for them, with responsibility, and with rigorous introspection and regard for attachment.
But in the Kali Yuga, every man seems to think that he is as good as the most exalted soul, and is on the same path . . . and can fulfill the same dharma, so he can do anything that the sage can do . . . not so! The difference between them and the sage is immeasurable . . .
27 April, 2010 at 7:01 pm
I think we have thoroughly covered, ha ha, hair. It isn’t a protective thing for me,I often cut it very short,just depends. I do however feel that people who constantly wear hats are trying to hide something.Also people who wear sunglasses,nothing irks me more than trying to look someone in the eye and carry on a conversation while they are wearing sunglasses. Facial hair,doesn’t matter to me one bit,same thing.
27 April, 2010 at 7:13 pm
Jame Wickstrom, great guy that the Jews & their bought stooges really hate (From the SPLC)…
Very good James Wickstrom Show from 4-14-2010…Click link below to download & listen…….there’s a little pause at the begining……
Guests: Mike Delaney, Wendy from florida & guest phone callers….LISTEN
Subjects: Feminism-Lesbianism Jews & Race mixing…..
http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-58022/TS-345640.mp3 Listen Now!
27 April, 2010 at 7:21 pm
Anybody get a load of the free for all punch fest in the Ukrainian parliament when they extended the lease of Sevastopol to the Russian Navy? Must have had a bunch of international money bag jew Soro’s thugs trying to disrupt things. Nothing that Zog would like better to close the Russian base down and make them move elsewhere. Hell I wonder why the Russkies ever allowed Ukraine to have the Crimea, far as I know its been in Russian hands since Tsar Peter the Great established the Russian navy.
27 April, 2010 at 7:27 pm
Have you ever heard a protest or peep from the Cubans over Americna Naval Base Guantanomo? Hell you’d think once an while they’d get a little perturbed over that thorn in the side.
27 April, 2010 at 7:31 pm
A”mystic yogi” says:
The reason is this: Hair symbolizes thoughts. Long hair is free and untamed….One must necessarily have thoughts that are unlimited; therefore the hair, symbolizing creative thought, is unlimited.”
Man, what an insight!
Now I understand why all females are endowed with vastly superior ability to think and rationalize. Or don’t they?
It is not the brain that matters, only the hair creates “thoughts that are unlimited”!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
1
27 April, 2010 at 7:47 pm
During the depression of the early 1930′s, my late uncle & his buddies hopped a boxcar to a place in the U.S. called California & he told me a lot of homeless guys who lived in the mountains in California had long hair in pony tails were called DINGBATS because on their hair styles. I guess these DINGBATS were the early hippies, before beatnicks & hippies
27 April, 2010 at 8:35 pm
Swami’s, also known as “Swamis”, is an internationally known surfing spot, a point break located in Encinitas, California. Swami’s was named after Swami Paramahansa Yogananda, because the grounds and hermitage of the Self-Realization Fellowship ashram, built in 1937, overlook this reef point.
Access to Swami’s is primarily by way of a small but well-appointed cliff top park, which has bathrooms, a water fountain, benches, picnic tables and a lawn under shade trees, as well as a small parking lot. Most importantly, it also has a long wooden staircase leading down beside the cliff to a sand beach, which has a lifeguard station. The rocky point is a couple of hundred yards north of that station.
Originally, “Swami’s” was an unofficial nickname that surfers gave to the break here, but the name was eventually adopted officially, and became the name of the cliff top park, which was previously known as “Seacliff Roadside Park”. [1]
Swami’s is a major surfing destination, especially during good swells in the winter months, because of its standout right point break, as well as fun reef breaks, and beach breaks. The number of surfers out can be very considerable when conditions are good. Surfing at this location is ideal with a low to mid tide, W or NW swell direction, and calm or E wind.
http://swamis.shea-design.com/
27 April, 2010 at 9:29 pm
Long Hair.short hair,no hair i don’t care.We must look at peoples hearts,as to whether they are stout White patriots.I personally don’t care other than personal cleanliness what people look like.A special “FUCK YOU Pal” goes out to “wilton”-who slammed Christ and the Hulkster in the same sentence.I dare you to tell the Hulk hes’s a long-haired pussy to his face.You should slap your mom for naming you “wilton”anyway.
27 April, 2010 at 9:55 pm
Hey Kuda
Swamis is a beautiful park! I used to go there often and sometimes would take my grandmother there for walks. My mother grew up in Encinitas . She is the one who told me about Swamis gardens. Quail botanical gardens is another must see in the area.
Does anyone else here have a problem with Google earth? I thought it was cool at first,then they came in with the street views. That’s kind of creepy. You can zoom in and see almost any one’s front door! They also update,I have seen the google camera truck on my street. It has a large pole on top of some small suv with a mounted camera on top. My grandfathers house in San Diego previously showed a woman walking away from his porch,now it does not. Why would they need to update?No major(or minor for that reason) construction has taken place.Anyone know if they are working with the government?
27 April, 2010 at 10:01 pm
A”mystic yogi” says:
The reason is this: Hair symbolizes thoughts. Long hair is free and untamed….One must necessarily have thoughts that are unlimited; therefore the hair, symbolizing creative thought, is unlimited.”
Man, what an insight!
Now I understand why all females are endowed with vastly superior ability to think and rationalize. …It is not the brain that matters, only the hair creates “thoughts that are unlimited”!
–Arminius
………………………….
Yeah, isn’t that a load of tommyrot?
By that standard, washing your body or wearing clothes is interferring with Nature. Why inhibit yourself? The Body must be allowed to Express Itself and be Free!!!
Oh, and I must give a special nod to Dave, btw, who takes all this ribbing so good naturedly. My kinda guy!
27 April, 2010 at 10:57 pm
“Hell, I wonder why the Russkies ever allowed Ukraine to have the Crimea, far as I know its been in Russian hands since Tsar Peter the Great established the Russian navy.” — nom de guerre
Actually, it was Catherine the Great. (Sorry to quibble, but I like to give credit where it’s due.) 1783 — same year as US independence.
But I don’t know why they allowed it to leave Russia either. Georgraphy, I guess.
In checking, I find that “Ukrainian is the single official state language, and is the sole language of government. [But] In the Crimea, government business is still carried out mainly in Russian. According to the census, 77% of Crimean inhabitants named Russian as their native language, and 10% Ukrainian.”
27 April, 2010 at 11:03 pm
Actually, I favor neither Russia or Ukrania … either one over the other. I think it’s a shame that they split up.
Just as it’s a shame that Ireland “abdicated from” the British Isles, so to speak. (left the UK) Together, they were a great power. Disunited and individually, they are nothing.
28 April, 2010 at 12:45 am
“Andrei’s ghost Says:
27 April, 2010 at 7:47 pm
During the depression of the early 1930’s, my late uncle & his buddies hopped a boxcar to a place in the U.S. called California & he told me a lot of homeless guys who lived in the mountains in California had long hair in pony tails were called DINGBATS because on their hair styles. I guess these DINGBATS were the early hippies, before beatnicks & hippies.”
************
Wow, imagine how strange those mountain men would have looked if they had gone into some redneck town in the south back then with their “dingbats”. No doubt there would have been trouble.
I think long hair looks best on a man if he’s a true revolutionary, like Che Guevara, or a dangerous wild-man, like Charles Manson. But not on candy-ass 80′s glam-rock stars. Remember bands like Posion, Cinderella and Concrete Blonde? Thank the Gods that Nirvana and other cool bands like that came along to put an end to all that glittering spandex crap.
http://blog.muchmusic.com/archives/images/cinderella.jpg
28 April, 2010 at 1:21 am
That picture….. OMG!!!
28 April, 2010 at 6:46 am
Ein, the reason Ireland (or at least 3/4 of the island) “abdicated” from the jewK in 1948 when the country officially became a republic, is because for centuries Irish people were treated like shit by the British ruling class. The true British are not to blame of course, it merely shows the Talmudic grip jews have on ‘England’.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
28 April, 2010 at 8:43 am
Arminius and Ein are obviously short-haired types.
Moreover, they are “sensory” types who were not very good at English in high school/college.
They hate John Denver and have never taken an art class.
They both, obviously, did not read what I said about culture.
They have some difficulties relating to women, and are somewhat baffled by them.
Arminius is not intellectually curious or he would know that the real Arminius, Hermann der Cheruscher, had long hair.
These are my intuitive long-haired mystical insights, and my deductions from what they have written.
Having said this, I must say that they have, no doubt, abilities in certain areas far in excess of my own. For this, I salute them, and breathe wholeness to them.
28 April, 2010 at 10:59 am
“The average city worker salary in San Francisco is $93,000 before benefits”
More than 1 in 3 of San Francisco’s nearly 27,000 city workers earned $100,000 or more last year – a number that has been growing steadily for the past decade.
The average city worker salary in San Francisco is $93,000 before benefits, according to Deputy City Controller Monique Zmuda. The data take into account everyone from park gardeners and street cleaners to attorneys and technology specialists.
Almost 100 city employees made $200,000 or more in 2009; six bumped past $300,000 when overtime and other cash-outs were included.
Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl…#ixzz0mFCruD9T
28 April, 2010 at 11:29 am
Where I am its snowing and NO I am not in the Rockies. The last five summbers have been cooler.
Orchards will be hurt this year.
Shortages of food ? Mud assaults for food this Year? One thing for sure NON Whites and NYC jooos will riot in a second and attack POLICE, and yet when Whites meekly carry a first amendment sign or try speak alone like Linder did, the POLICE jump him and beat him down.
Can you see the picture yet.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn ” A World Split Apart” 1978
28 April, 2010 at 11:36 am
Guess what? Actress Sandra Bullock has adopted a child!
Now, the first thing that came to my mind was “I bet it’s a nigger” when the article said she adopted a child from New Orleans. Well, just saw the picture, and surprise! it’s a nigger. Fucking disgusting! These Hollywood types are sickening, and the worst part is that they are put up on pedestals as role models. You ought to see all the white chicks who are oohing and aahing over this little nigglet. I think I’m going to lose my lunch…
28 April, 2010 at 11:43 am
Blackshirt, I just heard about that too. Guess this is a case of life imitating “art” as Bullock recently got a shiny gold statue from the jews for playing a woman in a film who takes in a young nigger buck and raises it to become a big football star. (Yay!) Wow, talk about committment to a role!
I guess Ms. Bullock will be stocking up on bananas big time.
28 April, 2010 at 11:46 am
Nigger sportswriter is saying sporting events should boycott Arizona because of the recent immigration law:
http://kevin-blackistone.fanhouse.com/2010/04/26/dont-play-ball-with-state-of-arizona/
How about if White people simply stop going to these idiotic niggerball events, and the whole thing becomes a non-issue?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
28 April, 2010 at 12:13 pm
KEEPING THINGS IN PERSPECTIVE
by H. Millard © 2010
A little understanding of science, along with proper beliefs, can help us understand the ways of existence and our place in it and may strengthen our faith in the importance of DNA, and help us stay on the path to our highest possible destiny.
Here’s how we came to be as we are today (all dates approximate):
13.7 billion years ago–Big Bang. Start of our universe.
4.5 billion years ago–Earth forms from spinning cloud of stellar dust.
3.8 billion years ago–First DNA molecule .
330 million years ago–First reptiles.
220 million years ago–First true mammals.
2.5 million years ago–Genus Homo.
200,000 years ago–Modern humans.
50,000 years ago–A few humans leave Africa for Europe and Asia and keep evolving.
20,000 years ago–White people begin emerging in Europe.
5,000 years ago–White people become dominant and virtually only type in Europe.
4,000 years ago–Recorded history begins.
Present day–Miscegenation, birth control, homosexuality, abortions, smaller families, lack of geographic and reproductive isolation are working against the evolution and eventual speciation of many White families and are sending them, genetically, back to Africa or causing them to become extinct.
The Future–Many of our family lines will become extinct. Those with the correct beliefs will stay on the right path and will survive into the future and may become a new species.
We White Mutants
Scientists believe that a tiny mutation in gene slc24a5, located on the long leg of chromosome 15 at position 21.1, started in the few people who left Africa and headed into Europe about 50,000 years ago was a major reason for the emergence of white skin.
White skin allowed in more sunlight and helped with the production of more Vitamin D than darker skin and prevented rickets. This mutation became the norm in Europe 5,300 to 12,000 years ago. This gene has primary alleles that differ in only one nucleotide, changing the 111th amino acid from alanine to threonine. In White European descended peoples, the threonine form is found in from 98.7% to 100% of the population while in Africans, East Asians and American Indians from 93% to 100% of the populations have the alanine form.
Many other mutations occurred among this new race as these people moved out of Africa. And that, is how White people came to be.
What about mutations?
Up until recent years it was thought that mutations were few and that most were catastrophic for those humans who received mutated genes. Now, it is known that mutations occur all the time. Most are very minor and cause no harm. If they provide a survival advantage (like white skin in less sunny lands) these mutated genes eventually may become fixed in the population and replace the non-mutated versions.
Some of these mutations are caused by cosmic rays (subatomic particles) that change the DNA sequence, and some are caused by temperature and other more common environmental agents and forces.
DNA PRIMER
Remember, all DNA is the same for all living things that we know about. That is, all DNA is composed of four chemicals that are abbreviated A, T, C, G. These chemicals are then shuffled by nature to make a blade of grass or a man.
Humans have approximately 3.1 billion combinations of these four letters in their genotype. These are further organized into 46 chromosomes and the chromosomes carry the 20,000 to 30,000 genes that make us as we are. The genes carry the instructions for producing a new organism in all its parts.
During mating, 23 chromosomes from the male join with 23 chromosomes from the female to create a new child. If the male and female are both White, then the child will be White. If one is not White, then the child will not be White because most “White” genes are recessive.
Recessive just means that it takes two copies of the gene–one from the male and one from the female to produce the characteristic.
If members of a species are isolated from others of the species for a long enough time, those who are isolated may become a new species no longer capable of breeding with the old species. But if the isolation is removed before specieshood, those who were on their way to being a new species may blend back in with the masses of the species.
28 April, 2010 at 12:23 pm
Klassikality Says:
“Blackshirt, I just heard about that too. Guess this is a case of life imitating “art” as Bullock recently got a shiny gold statue from the jews for playing a woman in a film who takes in a young nigger buck and raises it to become a big football star. (Yay!) Wow, talk about committment to a role!
I guess Ms. Bullock will be stocking up on bananas big time”
What kind of sucks is that I used to think she was hot. But she is just another example of a good looking White broad with a mind of shit. You are correct though, she knows to get ahead in Jewish Hollywood you have to show how much you love the colored folks. What next? Is she going to be dating a coon? Maybe Jesse James saw the writing on the wall and sabotaged his relationship on purpose- they say he’s a closet racist.
28 April, 2010 at 1:29 pm
There is a movie that came out about 5 years called “Idiocracy”. I highly recommend it. It is about the ‘Kwa five hundred years in the future where intelligent Whites have ceased reproducing, and low IQ whites and muds rule the country. They have a nigger president who might even be a tad worse than Obanga.
28 April, 2010 at 1:30 pm
Wait a second there, Doody. I hope you don’t buy into that Jewish bullshit that all the races of people on Earth today only diverged from each other a mere 50,000 years ago? There are more likely hundreds of thousands of years separating Whites from the other races. And contrary to Jew propaganda, those differences are significant.
But I’ve noticed something…. There are more than a few Orientals who have light skin and only partially slanted eyes. They’re obviously Mongol, but still, they almost look White! That makes me suspect that the evolutionary differences between Whites and Orientals is much smaller than the evolutionary differences between Whites and Blacks. And Orientals, although not capable of the same levels of imagination, creativity and individuality as Whites, are nevertheless a reasonably advanced race of people.
If there were no such things as White people, then the Orientals would obviously be the dominant race. But I doubt they would ever have been able to advance beyond a 13th or 14th century level of technology. Of course, Negroes and Aborigines would never have even invented fire or pointed sticks if the White Man didn’t show them how.
28 April, 2010 at 1:31 pm
About 5 years AGO. Sorry
28 April, 2010 at 1:43 pm
Tim, you are absolutely correct regarding Orientals. The Japs and Chinamen have high average IQs but have much fewer geniuses (or morons) than does the White race. They are capable of taking an invention that the White man has fabricated and sometimes actually improve on it. They are for the most part incapable of real creative thinking though. Dr. Richard Lynn posits that the reason is primarily genetic.
28 April, 2010 at 1:47 pm
Hollywood celebrities always consult with expensive “image experts” who, for around $100,000, will tell the celebrity what they should do in order to enhance their image. I guess right now those experts are telling female celebrities who are entering into early middle age and leaving their childbearing years behind them that buying a nigglet from Africa will make them more appealing to their 30 and 40-ish female fans, as well as make them more marketable for starring roles in chick flicks.
I look forward to the day when Hollywood and Beverly Hills will be nothing more than smoldering piles of radioactive debris.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
28 April, 2010 at 1:59 pm
You’re right, Jim, Orientals are excellent mimics who can quickly copy or imitate whatever gets invented by Whites. This gives them the illusion of being more intelligent than they really are.
Orientals have what can be called an insect mentality. Granted, they are efficient, productive and hard working, like the members of an ant colony or a beehive. But ant colonies and beehives will never produce an Isaac Newton, Aristotle, Beethoven or Shakespeare.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
28 April, 2010 at 2:06 pm
Red Skull if Hulk Hogan was such a man his daughter wouldn’t be dating a nigger. It looked like he had a healthy Aryan family until he agreed to do a reality show on Jewy VH1. Now he lost his wife, his son nearly killed his best friend while drunk driving, and his daughter is screwing around with niggers.
28 April, 2010 at 2:21 pm
Wow, Wilton. I didn’t know Hulk’s daughter was f*cking nigs! I can’t believe Hulk is OK with that. Geez, I guess she turned out to be another blond race traitor. We can only hope she doesn’t procreate with it.
28 April, 2010 at 2:36 pm
Forget it, Blackshirt. Once a White girl’s uterus has been contaminated with Erectus/Hominid/proto-Simian sex-juices, it’s already too late.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
28 April, 2010 at 2:54 pm
She is or was Blackshirt. I really think Hulks family went down the toilet when he starting doing that reality show. I did some google work, she was dating Yannique Barker, aka Stack$, so she is damaged goods.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stacks_(rapper)
28 April, 2010 at 3:12 pm
“Wait a second there, Doody. I hope you don’t buy into that Jewish bullshit that all the races of people on Earth today only diverged from each other a mere 50,000 years ago? There are more likely hundreds of thousands of years separating Whites from the other races. And contrary to Jew propaganda, those differences are significant.”
I agree with Tim. I don’t buy into that story that minimizes our divergence down to a mere 50,000 years. That’s just a skip and a jump, in evolutionary terms, and the implication is that we’re not really so far apart after all. So we’re all just brothers underneath the paint job.
I agree with that “Idiocracy” was good, and I recommend it too. But it was also politically correct, and they were very careful not to be disparaging to blacks in any way. No black idiots were shown, but plenty of white ones. In fact, the President was black, and he was more clever than all the rest of the dim-witted white fools around him. Also, the love interest of the white hero was a ‘sort-of’ black woman. IQ was the subject of the film, and all in jest, but race was given no attention at all. When they made fun of fools, they had to be white fools.
Regarding Sandra Bullock, I just returned from Europe (was delayed a week by the volcano) and there were two films shown on the plane — BOTH of them starring Sandra Bullock! Plus some other clips. So from Paris to Dallas, we were treated to non-stop Sandra Bullock. (What kind of “pull” does that woman have anyway? I can’t tell the difference between her and Julia Roberts.) One of them was that racial tear-jerker, “The Blind Side”, about a wonderful, kind (and wealthy) white woman who adopted a disturbed, homeless black giant into her family, took him into their mansion, and how he enriched and transformed all their lives with his magical presence.
Yeah, sure. Good luck to them! Full of teary scenes. And lots of happy racial messages. I was waiting to see when this big hulk would rape her beautiful teenage daughter or murder them all in their sleep. But that didn’t happen on screen. No. It might be more typical of real life, but Hollywood couldn’t have that. I had been avoiding that film and its ubiquitous ads for some time, but in this case we were a captive audience for 12 hours.
So now she’s adopting a black baby in her own REAL life! Good luck to her; she may be needing it. Unfortunately, she’s setting a fashion statment for millions of other gullible white women to follow.
28 April, 2010 at 4:53 pm
If The Hulks Daughter is fucking a nigger,then yes,something is wrong there.I only admired the Hulk when i was a kid,haven’t followed him lately.Proof it is though,that even the the famous can be cursed with crappy families and tradgedies.Sad.Sandra Bullock adopted a little brillo-head,and i used to like her some.Now,i want to wretch with revulsion.Poor Jesse.Luckily,he dumped the bitch.
28 April, 2010 at 4:55 pm
I still haven’t been able to figure out where I got my “less than 10%” of Asian DNA.
I understand that Attila (or was it Genghis Khan) was defeated in France (Gaul) by a Roman general around 400AD, but that was a very long time ago, even if his legions did go about raping.
28 April, 2010 at 8:36 pm
Hey, I have a question for Alex.
Do you know any cases in Canada where some Asian guy is harassed over radio by some idiot disk jockeys on the order of their media bosses not because he’s jerking off to porn all the time but because of his unfashionable internet activities like listening to Goyfire or watching Ahmadinejad rejecting the holowhatever. If you know any such cases, can you address such issues in your next goyfire?
28 April, 2010 at 10:38 pm
Antagonistes,
Have you had a DNA test done? If so,how much did it cost you? I’m very interested in having one done. I’m curious to see how accurate our family trees are. Ours only date back to 1650 or so,I would have to see it again to verify.
28 April, 2010 at 11:26 pm
I am interested in it too.
Antagonistes: Do you have Eastern European ancestry?
Say, Poland /Ukrania? Also Hungary? Maybe Finns???
The Mongols invaded Europe in the 1200′s — only 800 years ago. And ruled Russia for several centuries after. The Polish aristocracy believes itself to be descended from them.
29 April, 2010 at 3:50 am
The Slavs are more White looking than a lot of Western Europeans are. And unlike those Scandanavian and Germanic girls, Slavic girls would never bed down with some jive-talkin’ coon.
So there.
29 April, 2010 at 7:47 am
Dave–yes, I had a DNA test done by Genetree, also known as Ancestry-by-DNA. You swab your mouth in three different areas , put the swabs in a container, and send it back. They do the test 3 times. When I did it, it cost a bit more than $200.
Ein–interesting about the Eastern Europeans! But my mother’s side is mostly Anglo-Norman (with some Irish), and my father’s side, Anglo-Saxon (with some German).
But who knows?
I had this Polish guy named Dlugach in my high school. He and I had the same hair problem–it would not lay down and wanted to stick up! We were about the only ones with this problem. I went to a fancy hair salon and they did an analysis of my hair. They said it had an extra protein sheath, like Oriental hair. That, and other things, added to my suspicions about my family’s ancestry.
The ancestry test I took could not tell by DNA how much of the majority European ancestry I have came from France, England, etc.
Does anyone know of a test which narrows down your European ethnicity by country?
I think the Slavs have high intelligence and morality, from what I have seen and read. How did they get a bad rap?
29 April, 2010 at 1:31 pm
“Antagonistes Says:
29 April, 2010 at 7:47 am
I think the Slavs have high intelligence and morality, from what I have seen and read. How did they get a bad rap?”
************
Maybe it’s because of the hostility that has existed between various Germanic and Slavic tribes for centuries? Territorial disputes, invasions, that sort of thing. Additionally, the German barbarians were “civilized” by Roman and Greek culture centuries before the more geographically remote Slavs had any real exposure to outside civilizing influences. So when the Holy Roman Empire expanded into Slavic territory, the Germans found the Slavs still living as forest savages, like the Germans themselves were several centuries earlier. That gave the Germans the lasting impression that the Slavs were backwards.
But the Normans were more advanced than the Germanic Angles and Saxons whom they replaced as the rulers of England. The Germans’ architecture (the Romanesque style), clothing, art, table manners, etc. looked pretty crude compared to the Normans. So the Germans and Scandanavians, as much as I like them and admire them, were not always the most advanced or civilized people around and should therefore not denigrate their Slavic relatives for being “inferior”.
29 April, 2010 at 1:55 pm
How did they get a bad rap?”
Probably from losing their wars. They have always been a “ruled” people, not rulers, right down from earliest Viking times.
That would exclude Russians, to a degree. But their first “Russian” dynasty was Viking too (Rurik). And Russia didn’t really begin to expand and thrive until Peter the Great imported droves of teachers, craftsmen, shipbuilders, etc. from the West — largely from the Netherlands and Germany. He FORCED them upon recalcitrant Russia to bring it up to date in the world, against much resistance from the Slavs. Russia later expended and flourished greatly under Catherine the Great, a German, and her imported German advisors and military experts. Her court was mostly German (and Scandinavian). Russia also gained a lot of Scandinavians and Germans when it conquered Finland, Riga, and the Baltic coast. These became the driving force for progress within Russia.
I couldn’t help noticing when I was in Russia that ALL the palaces and fortresses and great buildings were built by Italian architects (sometimes Scottsmen too), and that virtually ALL the other splendid things we were shown were created by Western Europeans who had settled in Russia or by students of those Westerners. And if you look at the Russian nobility or royalty, from Catherine’s time on they were very heavily German.
As for Poland, there was a museum exhibition in Philadlphia,about 8 years ago on the Polish nobility. I didn’t get to attend, but read the newspaper review. It was fascinating. It stated that the Polish nobility had always held themselves apart from the Slavs whom they ruled; they considered themselves another people, conquerors from out of the East. Two distinct peoples! I had never known that. I’ve read the same elsewhere since, even on Wikipdeia, which confirms it. The notion is largely fiction today, probably, but was part of their “mythology” that was their excuse to justify their rule — but also probably with at least a grain of truth in it, as all myths must have.
29 April, 2010 at 2:16 pm
“the Germans found the Slavs still living as forest savages, like the Germans themselves were several centuries earlier. That gave the Germans the lasting impression that the Slavs were backwards.” … Tim
It is a fact that all the cities and towns in Poland were founded by German settlers. The Slavs were a rural people, not towndwellers.
I have read exactly the same of Ireland — that ALL the towns in Ireland were begun as English settlements (or before them, by the Vikings – such as Dublin). The Irish Celts were a rural, pastoral, tribal people. They did not live in towns.
It was much the same with the Anglo-Saxons, who had a rural, communal form of life, largely egalitarian, and without slaves or serfs. It was the Normans (recent Vikings themselves) who brought Feudalism into England from France (and thence to all the rest of the British Isles). Feudalism, the re-worked residue of the Roman slave system, reduced the common people to serfs and elevated the very few who were nobles, making a sharp distinction; but it was considered the very “latest thing” from the Continent at that time. State of the art, as we say today.
Feudalism certainly was successful! The tribal Anglo Saxons resisted bitterly (and I think sporadic resistance went on for something like 30 years) but they were up against a more organized, efficient system, and their way of life was doomed. The Normans were ruthless in imposing their rule, and they established an aristocracy whose descendents have owned and controlled England (and the British Isles) for the last thousand years, up to this day.
29 April, 2010 at 4:44 pm
Ein, you’re right that Germans ruled the Russian throne for a long time. But isn’t it also true that the British throne has been ruled by Germans for the last 300 years, the so-called “House of Windsor”? They changed it to that name in WWI so it wouldn’t sound so German. What was it originally called, Gotha-Saxony-Kohlburg or something?
And wasn’t Prince Albert a German, and Queen Victoria, too? In fact, wasn’t Victoria the grandmother of Kaiser Wilhelm II and Czar Nicholas II? If we are going to condemn the Slavs for being a “ruled” people, then the same must also be said for the English, mustn’t it?
And yes,the Normans were originally a Viking people, but by the time they conquered Britain they were a lot more French than Viking. And they had better table manners than the Angles and Saxons did.
29 April, 2010 at 5:03 pm
How big of a role did the Jews play in the rise and success of the USSR? Was the USSR military and space programs top heavy with Jews, or was it actual Russians running things? It looks like the Jews were more prepared for the collapse of communism then Ivan six pack. It was the Jews who took control of Russian industry, while the Ivan and Svetlana six pack were walking around shell shocked.
29 April, 2010 at 5:46 pm
Site:LRP:Western Technology & Soviet Economic Development
by Leslie R. Pastor [West Tech: A Product of the Control Paradigm] Copyright © 2009
The three (3) volume study of Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development written by Antony C. Sutton provided a significant ‘revelation,’ that the West, first funded the Russian Revolution and installed a Bolshevik government in Russia, exclusive of all other factions, who were fighting for freedom from ‘centrist’ authoritative totalitarian control, eliminating Kerensky, the Whites, and the Greens, and ultimately the Czar, Czarina and their entire family. Then, subsequently, the United States, European nations and Japan, set about to create and then to sustain the Soviet Union, economically, by providing huge transfers of technology and engineering know-how. All of this is laid out in Western Technology and Soviet Economic Development firstly, and then in Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution secondly. While the American public were literally starving during the Great Depression, and dead broke, having neither income, work, nor pensions, a massive building program was being engineered on the Russian mainland complete with American technology, American Engineering and know-how. Why?
Antony C. Sutton explains: “One of the truly great surprises in researching this study was the discovery that the architectural design and supervision of construction of industrial units as well as the supply of equipment and similar assistance was very much an American responsibility. In the words of Albert Kahn Co., Inc., the foremost industrial architects in the United States:
“It was in 1928…that the most extraordinary commission ever given an architect came in the door unannounced. In that year a group of engineers from the U.S.S.R. came to the Kahn office with an order for a $40 million (dollar) tractor plant, and an outline of a program for an additional two billion dollars’ worth of buildings. About a dozen of these factories were done in Detroit; the rest were handled in a special office with 1,500 draftsmen in Moscow.
The ‘outline of the program’ presented to the Kahn organization in 1928 was nothing less than the First and Second Five-Year Plans of ‘socialist construction.’ Gosplan had decided upon those sectors it wanted developed and their approximate capacities. No foreign influence has been found at the Gosplan level.
These plans were then turned over to the Albert Kahn Company for conversion into production units.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:Western_Technology_&_Soviet_Economic_Development
29 April, 2010 at 5:50 pm
Wilton, this should help a lot:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:Western_Technology_&_Soviet_Economic_Development
29 April, 2010 at 5:55 pm
Complete corroboration for the general argument of this study comes from an excellent source: Joseph Stalin. In June 1944, W. Averell Harriman, reporting to the State Department on a discussion between Eric Johnston and Stalin, made the following significant statement:
“Stalin paid tribute to the assistance rendered by the United States to Soviet industry before and during the war. He said that about two-thirds of all the large industrial enterprises in the Soviet Union had been built with United States help or technical assistance.”
Source: U.S. State Dept. Decimal File, 033.1161
Johnston, Eric/6-3044: Telegram June 30, 1944
29 April, 2010 at 7:19 pm
Tim McGreen Says:
Ein, you’re right that Germans ruled the Russian throne for a long time. But isn’t it also true that the British throne has been ruled by Germans for the last 300 years, the so-called “House of Windsor”? They changed it to that name in WWI so it wouldn’t sound so German. What was it originally called, Gotha-Saxony-Kohlburg or something?
Correct: Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. You make good points, none of which I contest. I forget now which was the last “English” monarch of England. I’d have to look it up. But it ‘s been about 300 years, as you said.
It was under the rule of William & Mary [William was also ruler of the Netherlands] that “Dutch” advisors, financiers, and such began pouring into England from Amsterdam… to such a degree that they caused quite a bit of resentment at the time. But William was more pre-occupied with his Dutch holdings. (I don’t know if he spoke English either — probably not.) William & Mary signed the English Bill of Rights, beginning a new co-operation with Parliament, and leading to greater “democracy” in Britain. Well, we know what that eventually led to.
Actually, the new “rulers” of Britain — the merchants and financial interests – - liked it precisely that way. From then on, they were in charge. The Hannoverians (the King Georges from Germany) didn’t even speak English and took little interest in government. They, too, were more attached to their German possessions than England. This left the mercantile interests (through Parliament) more freedom to do as they pleased, with little royal interference. Power actually passed from the Crown to the new “rulers” at this time. It’s been so ever since.
And wasn’t Prince Albert a German, and Queen Victoria, too? In fact, wasn’t Victoria the grandmother of Kaiser Wilhelm II and Czar Nicholas II?
Yes, they were ALL intimately inter-related….. just one big royal family in fact.
Victoria, a naive , sheltered, and unworldly young woman (and reputedly not especially bright either) became queen at 18 and soon fell madly in love with her “German” cousin Albert. She proposed to him, not he to her. I have always wondered if Albert was at least partly Jewish. (The German aristocracy had become riddled with Jews, accodring to AH.) His portraits certainly look considerably Jewish to me, much more so than “German”. Under Victoria’s very long reign, the Rothschilds and Disraeli came into full power and they became the new rulers and owners of the great Empire that the blood and toil of the British people had built. Yes, the English were indeed a “ruled” people.
If we are going to condemn the Slavs for being a “ruled” people, then the same must also be said for the English, mustn’t it?
And so they are, Tim. I don’t disagree. Oh, but don’t misunderstand me; I didn’t mean to “condem” anyone for being ruled, I was just taking note of the fact.
And yes,the Normans were originally a Viking people, but by the time they conquered Britain they were a lot more French than Viking. And they had better table manners than the Angles and Saxons did.
You’re probably right there, too, Tim. No matter what else they did, they had better table manners. At least they ate beef and not cow, pork and not pig. (Who would want to eat pig meat for supper? Yuk.) :)
29 April, 2010 at 10:25 pm
Sir Walter Scott makes some very amusing and detailed distinctions between the Norman rulers of Britain and the deposed Saxon aristocracy in Ivanhoe, which also happened to be the first historical novel.
As usual, Ein’s knowledge, life experiences and perspicacity are formidable. It’s all I can do to keep up with him! (pant, pant…can’t stop, must keep up, no time to pee….so tired, so very tired…)
30 April, 2010 at 2:42 am
PATHS OF DESTINY & OUR EVOLUTION
by H. Millard © 2009
If we focus on politics and social concerns without scratching the surface of reality to find the underlying causes of everything in existence, along with the rules and natural laws that they either obey or cause, and fail to use that knowledge to see how they play out in our own everyday reality, we’ll forever be lost and confused and will fail to truly understand why we should oppose miscegenation and similar mad and evil things.
And we’ll also look at what happens around us with a low level of consciousness that fails to see real patterns and causality where they do exist, but sometimes imagine patterns and causality where they don’t exist.
Such low level consciousness and the thinking it engenders seems to be the province of most humans today who are sleep walking through meaningless lives with no idea of why things happen, or what constitutes good or evil or what a proper purpose of life means.
If we are to wake ourselves up and live consciously and try to understand something of existence as expressed in our everyday reality, we must begin with ourselves and start with the premise that White people are different from other peoples just as all other distinct peoples are different from others. Not only do our eyes tell us this, but science confirms it.
There is no need here to go into detail about why and how Whites are different from other peoples other than to say that we are largely as we are as a result of our adaptations to a colder, less sunny climate and other conditions in Europe. Genes are interconnected and if you change one thing–such as making skin white to let in more sun for the production of Vitamin D (which happened with us), other things, including things not easily seen, such as ways of thinking, change as well.
The changes we underwent in Europe set us on a different path from the rest of humanity.
Indeed, nature and our relative isolation in Europe set us on a path leading toward speciation, and we would have become a new species given enough time. How much time? We don’t know.
Unfortunately, our isolation, which is necessary for full speciation, has now been interrupted by the mass invasion of formerly white lands by non-whites. This creates a gene flow that blends those who practice miscegenation back into the masses of humanity. Mainly, it means that Whites will be blended away due to the relative newness of our genotype. We are the newbies on this dark planet and our genetically determined characteristics are thus more fragile and more easily assimilated into darker gene pools.
It is important to understand that it takes the mating of a White male and a White female to produce a new White person. Any other combination does not produce one of us and destroys the internal White blueprint in that family line. The family may retain the old family name, but a branching off that takes it genetically back to Africa and out of Europe has occurred. In other words, such a child lacks our mutations and adaptations that we acquired once we branched off from the masses of humanity in the dim past.
To be perfectly clear about this point, instead of moving us toward speciation–which we believe requires us to “whiten” up, miscegenation blends those who practice it back into the darker masses.
An important thing to understand is that we Whites have a God (or nature if you prefer) given right to remain different and not blend back in with the masses of humanity, and we have the right to pursue our destiny as we, alone, see fit. We have this right, inherent in us and it is not something that we have to demand or beg for. We have the right simply because we exist.
As far as this destiny goes, some of us believe that there is not one destiny for any organism, including humans, and that possible destinies lie ever before us in myriad paths and turnings that we take, even if we aren’t aware of them, caused by the blind workings of nature which never stops tinkering with life.
We further believe that White people have reached a point in our evolution where we now have a chance to intelligently choose the paths of destiny–that we can steer our own evolution–as the paths open before us. And, we believe that the highest possible destiny for White people is, in fact, to constantly take the path in front of us, as each opens, that leads to becoming a new species of human.
Natural dislike of White people is nature’s way to help them survive
There is a natural dislike of White people by non-White people that is in their genetic programs. We are their genetic enemy because we are a new model human heading toward becoming an even different form of human. We are their competitors for resources and the niches that humans fill. Thus, on a genetic level, we are a danger to the continued existence of other peoples. Their conscious minds may not register this (just as ours also don’t usually register this), but, again, it is part of their genetic program that we are the enemy and must be destroyed.
And, our attempted destruction is what we see all around us. It’s not just the violent crime that darker peoples commit against us, but that’s part of it. It’s seen in the push for us to marry outside our people and produce children who are not our kind. It’s also seen in things such as trying to make homosexuality seem as normal as heterosexuality, in birth control, and in abortions. These things hold down our birthrate. And, it’s seen in the invasion of formerly White lands by darker immigrants. This is happening all around the planet. What this dark invasion does is change the mating choices of our own people who, when caught up in the instinctual desire to mate, often find their choices among our own people few and far between while there are increasing mating choices offered by the invaders.
Factor in the blending conditioning that the blenders are using on our children as young as 2 years-old and you have White people wrongly thinking that all humans are just the same and therefore if they marry outside of our people it doesn’t matter. It does matter. It’s personal and familial genocide.
You’ve seen the blenders, “diversity is wonderful,” multiculti cartoons and books aimed at young kids, so we needn’t belabor the point.
The truth about miscegenation, just to be clear, is that it is genocide. It kills off our more fragile genes that are uniquely ours among all humans. We Whites are not all blond haired and blue-eyed, and our skin tone is not a uniform snow white amongst our own people, but these characteristics are unique to us, as are many other features including our bone structure, nose shapes, thin lips, our head shapes, our hair textures and thousands of other differences external and internal that make us, us.
The blender propaganda tries to convince you that genes–that you were born with and which have created you–are unimportant and that an artificial man-made world view that says genes don’t matter is what is important. This is nonsense.
Conditioning is potent. Fish trained to get food at one end of an aquarium who are then kept from getting that food by a pane of glass inserted in the tank, will soon starve to death, even when the glass has been removed, after their brains have been hardwired via conditioning to believe that they can’t get to the end of the tank with the food without bumping into something invisible.
In truth, if there is anything at all that is authentic and worth saving, it is our specific genetic code that makes us, us.
Why in the world would anyone think that a nation, a culture, a book, an idea are worth saving, while genes are not? It’s insanity.
A blending ideology and its conditioning is a madness afoot in the world today that will no doubt destroy many White families and turn them non-White. Like the fish mentioned above, many of our people are having their brains hardwired by conditioning. They simply will no longer see the truth. They are incapable of doing so.
Perhaps a few words about some of the basics are in order here.
Begin with the question: What are you?
You are the outward manifestation of a code comprised of the 4 chemicals of DNA (A,T,C,G) sorted out in about 3 billion combinations (think a massive deck of cards if it helps visualize this) these 3 billion combinations of the DNA letters have about 20–30,000 genes–which are just locations on the strands of DNA which are further organized on your 46 chromosomes that cause you to have your eye color, skin color and all your other characteristics (actually, it’s a little more complicated than that with genes, but this is the basic idea). The possible variations of those 3 billion letters are in the many trillions, yet with all the individual differences, you are part of a group of individuals who share the main characteristics that make what we call races in humans, breeds in dogs, and varieties in plants.
You are a White person because your mother and father were White people. At the moment you were conceived, 23 of your father’s White chromosomes joined with 23 of your mother’s White chromosomes to start the process of life that is normal for our species and which nine months later resulted in your birth as an individual with 46 White chromosomes.
Although your four DNA chemicals are exactly the same as those in all other peoples, all other animals, and all plants, it is the way you have been shuffled together–the particular order of those letters–that has made you as you are.
Yes, there is an underlying sameness to all life, just as there is an even deeper underlying sameness to all of existence. In fact, all of existence is just simple things repeated and reshuffled in trillions and trillions of different ways. Under it all are waves and subatomic particles, but for our purposes here, we needn’t scratch that far down into existence other than to acknowledge there is a ground of existence upon which everything else is built, and that there are laws of nature at that level that affect our existence at our level.
It is the differences that matter between our kind and other kinds in our level of existence. Don’t ever buy the lies from the blenders to the contrary or your family line may become extinct and you will surely not evolve along the path that many of us think is the best possible path for us as we move to ever higher consciousness and toward the light.
Perhaps a simple way of thinking about this is offered by snowflakes. What are snowflakes? They are water, just like the water in rain, lakes, sleet, hail, ice rivers, ponds, streams, oceans. But a snowflake is not rain, a lake, sleet, etc. The water has become something different. In this case, it has been shuffled in a different way by the temperature and atmospheric conditions.
And, even though the countless trillions of snowflakes are all different from each other in many individual ways, they are still recognizable as snowflakes–all with six arms–and are not confused with rain or lakes or anything else. So it is with us. White people may vary from each other in many individual ways, but ultimately we are still recognizable as White people and as different from other peoples.
Simply put, all life is made of the same stuff at a very low level of organization, but the differences that come in later are what make us different.
Vive le difference! May it always exist. May we always exist. May we evolve ever higher.
# # #
30 April, 2010 at 2:44 am
THE FLDS AND NATURAL LAW
by H. Millard © 2009
Bigots and haters never change, they just change their targets.
Judging from comments posted on newspaper blogs following articles about the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (fundamentalist Mormons), who practice polygamy as part of their religion, one must conclude that many of those who hated homosexuals have now accepted them as “natural” and have switched to hating polygamists as “unnatural.”
From this, we might divine that haters and bigots are not only cowards, but that they also have low IQ’s and are easily manipulated to love or hate whatever the establishment of any time and place wants them to love or hate.
Not only is this new found acceptance of homosexual marriage and hatred of polygamous marriage topsy-turvey, it’s also anti-nature. And, if it’s anti-nature, it’s anti-God (if one wishes to posit a God).
To understand why, one has to understand that there are natural laws of existence that take precedence over all man made laws. Natural laws are natural, because they just are, while man made laws often change to be trendy, just as do many religions and churches that claim to worship God, but which really worship man.
One such natural law–it may be a primary natural law–is to expand whatever it is that you are. It matters not whether you are a cockroach or a man or an entire universe. The law of expansion says that you must make more like yourself or you will die off.
The reason that this may be a primary natural law is that in a cosmic sense, we can say that this law was first seen at the moment of the creation of our universe with the Big Bang. That event, in which a relatively small “point” began expanding and creating everything in existence, set the pattern for all existence. This principle of a single point expanding, is found throughout nature and throughout all life.
What expands, lives. What contracts, dies.
As already mentioned, you can insert some concept of God in this, or you can leave any such concept out. It makes no difference. Nature is nature. It is what it is and it does what it does naturally. Water doesn’t have to think about running down hill, or have a written law about this, it just does it. Fire doesn’t have to think about being hot, or have a written law telling it to be hot, it just is that way.
If you can observe and fully understand the true laws of nature, you’ll understand a proper course to take in your life. The difficulty is in fully understanding these true laws that are all around us.
What you’ll observe in nature–if you really understand–is that this principle of expansion is also the primary purpose of life–all life–including human life.
We are born to breed and we live to make more like ourselves. This is how we expand. If we do not do this, we have no primary purpose in living.
Homosexual marriage promotes contraction, not expansion. It is, therefore, not natural. But, even apart from homosexual marriage, anything that promotes contraction contravenes the primary purpose.
Polygamous marriage on the other hand–at least as practiced by the FLDS today–promotes expansion, not contraction. It is therefore in accord with the natural law of expansion.
But, the haters and bigots are persecuting FLDS members and trying to wipe them out. In addition to the hatred of polygamy, the other hatred they have for the FLDS is something that is not often reported, but which may be the true source of their hatred and bigotry: the FLDS members are all White and also follow Joseph Smith’s teachings in this regard. They are wonderfully undiverse.
And, as to the last point above, it should not be forgotten that the excuse for the state of Texas to barge in and forcefully take all 439 FLDS children away from their parents at the FLDS’s Texas property was because a Black woman allegedly claimed in a series of telephone calls to authorities that she was an underage White FLDS girl who was being sexually abused. Of course, this was all a bunch of crap and all the FLDS children have now been returned to their relatives.
So far, the FLDS members are staying true to their beliefs and have not jumped on the blending bandwagon and are staying out of the genocidal melting pot.
Hopefully, they’ll stay true to their beliefs–no matter the persecution–and won’t change a single belief to be a religion of man and to be acceptable to genocidal evildoers.
While many of us may not accept the FLDS faith as our own, and while many, if not all, FLDS members may not accept our views as expounded in this column, we might still agree that some of their important beliefs–when stripped of surplusage–do agree with some of our important beliefs even if the supposed source and exposition of their beliefs is different than our own.
And, just how might some of us who are not FLDS, and who do not accept that faith as our own, state one of our important religious beliefs? This way: Expand always, contract never.
But what does this really mean in the context of this column? It means this: Have as many children in your image as possible. Need a further explanation? Okay. This means combine 23 White female chromosomes with 23 White male chromosomes to produce as many White children who have the full complement of 46 White chromosomes as possible during your lifetime. And, whatever forms of marriage–or types of relationships, including having children while not married, or practicing polygamy–accomplishes this, is nature’s way for our expansion.
Remember, because most White characteristics are recessive, it takes two Whites–a White male and a White female–to produce a new White child.
To put this in other terms: Have as many children who look like you as possible, and you–the essential part of you; your genotype and phenotype–will survive. Have no children or too few children who may not survive to have their own children or have children who practice miscegenation and you will not survive.
Fecundity wins; sterility loses. It is nature’s way
30 April, 2010 at 3:26 am
AMERICA A TWO-CLASS SOCIETY
by H. Millard © 2010
There has been talk in the press recently about how the U.S. has become a two-class society based on the fact that half of the population pays taxes and the other half doesn’t.
As true as this may be, there is an even greater divide: America is split between a White class and a non-White class.
Anti-White bigots and haters bemoan this divide, but nature tells us that such a divide is natural, and if Whites are to pursue their highest possible destiny and evolve even more from the masses of humanity, from which they emerged perhaps a mere 20,000 years ago, the divide must increase.
Evolution is all about divergence and branching off and it might be thought of as being a little like distillation. First there is a mass of humans, then a small portion leave the mass like droplets of vapor leaving a distillation flask in a lab. If the few drops remain separate, they remain different and continue down a different evolutionary path. But, if they are poured back into the flask from which they originated, they just become the same as the rest of the contents of the flask.
With organisms, including humans, this constant divergence and branching off by the few is, in a sense, a natural competition to be the most dominant or on the top of the heap or the highest in any environment or circumstances. Those with adaptations that are better suited for a particular environment or circumstances will become dominant in that environment or circumstances just by the automatic workings of natural selection.
Nature doesn’t care who wins or loses. That’s up to us. And, the reason it is up to us is because we have reached a point in our evolution where we can understand these things. With understanding comes the responsibility to take charge of our own destiny or forever be blown about by the vagaries of blind evolution. We must now act and live consciously.
It’s also interesting to note that this struggle is not only played out in things we see in the wilds or in labs, but it is also seen in our everyday human lives in every type of competition we engage in, including the sports games we observe or play which we arrogantly think we invented or engage in solely as a matter of our free will, but which are actually part of our DNA program filtered through our brains as we think up ritual games as a reflection of evolutionary processes and the struggle to be and to be more.
There really is a bigger, but more basic or more underlying, picture to existence than is usually talked about. We humans are far too convinced that what happens right now or what has happened in the last few thousand years is supremely important. In fact, a few thousand years is nothing. We need to focus on the long view of history. We need to understand that we have diverged from other humans as evolution works itself out, and that our highest destiny is to continue to diverge, not blend back in.
And, even though White haters and bigots want to blur the lines, the division is real and is caused by nature and will always exist so long as there are Whites and non-Whites.
Of course, this division is not what the White haters want. In fact, they have been working hard for decades to cause miscegenation, abortion and low birth rates for Whites so that there are no longer any Whites in America or on the rest of the planet. They want us to blend back in with the humanity that we have branched off from. If one wanted to engage in Biblical imagery, one might say that the White haters are doing the work of Satan by keeping Whites from evolving ever closer to God.(NB: Isn’t the best trajectory of evolution toward higher consciousness? And, isn’t higher consciousness the same as moving closer to God i.e. to a greater understanding of existence?)
Anyway, back to the mundane. Statistically speaking, White America is pretty much as it has always been. It has low crime, high education, efficient cities, good schools, a relatively high quality of life. You know this is true. Just look at the statistics from areas that are mostly White. They are, usually, nice and safe places to live. And, this even includes White areas that may be less wealthy. There is very little crime in such places.
And, statistically speaking, non-White America is mostly the way it has always been also. The statistics are there for anyone to see.
Now, to be very clear about this, when we speak of White vs. Non-White America we are doing so in terms of statistics and not in terms of individuals.
Clearly, the statistics do not apply to every individual in the two classes. And, the two classes can even be broken down further, but this would take us down a very long road that would require a deeper discussion about evolution, adaptation, mutations, etc. that is better left for a book length presentation.
Still, if you read between the lines of this talk about two classes in America based on who pays taxes, and its general public acceptance as being true, and then when you factor in the demographics of crime and other statistics you begin to understand that more and more White Americans are starting to have their consciousness raised to the point where they are beginning to understand that many of the problems we see in our nation–the high violent crime rate, the failing schools, the abundance of takers instead of producers–are not really White problems at all and that White America is still pretty much the same as it has always been.
The difference now–starting several decades ago–is that non-White problems have been made White problems by being integrated into a sort of make-believe, plain wrap, one size fits all society that demands that we not notice–speaking statistically, again–that many of the “inner”characteristics of human beings are externally coded by nature.
But, this goes far deeper than just human behavior. It is so throughout nature.
It cannot be any other way. Genes ‘R Us is the basic rule of all living things. Race is to humans as breed is to dogs as variety is to flowers.
The sooner that we, as human beings, understand this simple basic rule of nature about genes, the sooner will we be able to start solving some of society’s problems so that all peoples will be able to live happy productive lives.
If we continue to ignore the truths of nature, we will forever be throwing money at problems in the wrong way, and the problems will never go away because we will continue trying to force different peoples into a mold, that has largely been based on a model of humanity that tacitly holds that Whites are the basic model human and all other peoples are just darker skinned White people who simply need to be around Whites for some of that inner Whiteness to emerge.
If we pretend that all humans are the same, we are simply showing a lack of intellectual rigor, or cowardice, or both. President Obama called for a national dialog on race. Why hasn’t that happened? The answer is that it hasn’t happened because of a fear of being called names by bigots and haters if we honestly discuss this subject.
Remember, it is not about this or that group being better or worse than others as these terms are used in everyday speech. In nature, and humans are part of nature, there are no better or worse groups of anything. There are just differences caused by different adaptations and mutations which allows nature to fill every niche with life that will be comfortable and profitable in that niche. That’s what evolution is all about. That’s what it has always been about.
Finally, more and more Whites are convinced that they must remain a separate people and not blend back into the masses of humanity if they are to evolve in the best direction; which means to have general adaptations, rather than narrow specific adaptations, that will lead to ever higher consciousness and the ability to fill all niches with their kind. To some, this is also a religious path. And, as human beings, it is their natural right–simply because they are alive–to choose and take what they think is the best path for themselves.
30 April, 2010 at 5:04 pm
The Japs can not only copy a product or concept, they can extend it, improve it, and sometimes even make an idea of Whites work that Whites found infeasible. Key examples were the oxygen torpedo, the peroxide torpedo and the Wankel rotary engine. They can produce economically things Whites never would get around to, such as a television set that ran fifteen years on average without a service call (thus putting the TV repair industry out of business, eliminating one of two sources for kids to learn electronics and therefore the competition). They are capable of understanding the finer points of classical music and theater at a high level.
But they are not capable of taking a completely new idea to first implementation.
The other Orientals of some achievement-Chinese and Koreans-are further down the creativity scale. They can basically copy Western innovations, and when sufficient motive exists do a good job of it. Han Chinese under non-collectivist rule, say Taiwan, can aggressively compete on quality and selection as well as price: mainland China is good only for low cost. Koreans are somewhat interesting but again they really do not innovate much.
Whereas the Japanese indigenously produced, say, attractively semi-original car designs, the Koreans are wholly indebted to Western design firms for their styling. Several Mazda, Toyota and Nissan cars are in terms of design quite desireabe (aside from their propensity to rust). The Nissan Fairlady (Datsun 2x0Z/ZX to us) is a good example of a desireable car inspired by Western designs but wholly indigenous in execution. The Toyota Land Cruiser is another exceptional design example, being in many respects a radically improved Land Rover.
30 April, 2010 at 7:13 pm
@Bret
That is funny,as I started to read your comment I thought oh oh,the Wankel engine then you said it. When I was much younger I was a rotary mechanic specializing in all generations of Rx-7′s. What neat engines they were! Felix Wankel the genius he was,just could not or did not wish to perfect the design into something useable.
Japanese cars are my super happy time number one choice Lmao.
Seriously though,the Rx-7,supra,hell even crx’s all very fun,reliable and capable cars. The only car’s I have ever owned and enjoyed more than my Jap cars were my 70 Nova,for it’s sheer power,and my Porsche 944 for its power/handling and build quality!
30 April, 2010 at 11:18 pm
“we can listen to the music of Prokofiev and Shostakovich without being Reds”
Apparently Prokofiev was not really a Red but an amoral careerist who returned to Mother Russia because he couldn’t hack it in the West. In his private beliefs, he was a Christian Scientist. A couple books published in the last three or four years make this clear.
Hey, Socrates said post anything we want, right?
Shostakovich, in my opinion only, was a crypto-jew. He got the shit scared out of him, so who knows what he believed. Probably nothing. His Memoirs, miraculously told to a fellow tribesman and published in the West, occasioning a delicious jewy “debate” during the Jimmy-Carter’s-jews era, are self-pitying and cynical.
As to the music, P wrote some cute stuff when younger but went stale (the war works are an exception), while S’s stuff was always unpleasant and unedifying.
30 April, 2010 at 11:32 pm
Jim said
“I have never seen a nigger though, who didn’t look like shit with a beard and long hair.”
I would have ended that sentence after the words “who didn’t look like shit.”
1 May, 2010 at 12:48 am
“we can listen to the music of Prokofiev and Shostakovich without being Reds”
Who would want to? I don’t much care for them anyway. Never did.
1 May, 2010 at 2:54 am
240 Z, 260 Z and 280 Z and what ever other Z then can along were severe RUST buckets.
The 240 Z was a great little car, but if there are any z’s left they have been kept garaged since purchased, believe it.
1 May, 2010 at 4:44 am
Never liked Jap cars. No sir. Only Pontiacs for me.
1 May, 2010 at 12:18 pm
Pontiacs? bleh! I had to thumb you down for that Tim. heh. Unless you’re talking about old Pontiacs(muscle cars) or Fiero’s. Those are fun cars!
1 May, 2010 at 2:36 pm
http://zhome.com/Dec99/Bolivia.htm
http://www.zhome.com/
1 May, 2010 at 2:47 pm
The angle between the differential and half-shafts was determined to be too great, resulting in the unacceptable vibration. The solution was to move the differential rearward, but that presented a problem of interference with the gas tank. As a result the gas tank had to be made smaller, but to maintain the driving range necessary for America, the Z had to be made lighter. Every aspect of the construction of the Z was thus reviewed with the goal of making it lighter without sacrificing strength.
Above Photo Courtesy of Digital Manga Inc.
A crack developed during US Road Testing so the fiberglass headlight nacelles were doubled in thickness and thus strength. Which solved the problem but added some weight back to the car.
With the early results from the US Road Test Cars, Nissan had the problems mostly corrected by the end of Dec. 69 and regular production began to ramp back up in January 1970.
If you would like to read more about the design and development of the Datsun 240-Z, I highly recommend the book “Project X 240Z” by Akira Yokoyama as published by Digital Manga Publishing. You can find sales outlets listed at the URL given.
Presented in the traditional Japanese “Manga” format (comic book drawings in American terms) you will have a greater appreciation for not only the Datsun 240-Z and the men that made it happen, you’ll be introduced to an entertaining art form for story telling. (make no mistake, this is an exceptionally well researched and accurately reported account, even if some artistic license has been taken..cjb)
Not only is it the most reasonably priced Book about the Datsun 240-Z you’ll ever buy, it is in my opinion, the one that lays out the story of the Z Car in the most accurate manor. Order a couple of copies and give one to a fellow Z Car Enthusiast.
http://www.zhome.com/
1 May, 2010 at 6:23 pm
GTOs, Firebirds, Grand Prix’s, Grand Am’s……I always thought Pontiac had the best looking American cars. I just never liked those finicky, sissy European cars or those tinny, boring to look at Jap cars. A 1970 GTO Judge in Orbit Orange and a black 1977 Smokey and the Bandit Trans Am…They represented the greatness that WAS America.
1 May, 2010 at 11:59 pm
Muscle cars in general are very interesting. If you have ever had any experience with them then it is evident. Let’s just take the 68 Chevelle. Even the name just work’s! The styling is superb. The build quality is top notch. Little things that are often over looked such as window regulators,door handles and latch mechanisms are built to last and very precise in their action. Look how many car’s from the 80′s-90′s have had faulty parts or low cost garbage installed from the factory. Most 68 Chevelles still use their original window regulators and door hardware etc.
The engines,while extremely powerful obviously score a zero in the economy dept. be it a 350 or a 396. Gas was cheap back then. Also if you want to do any REAL driving the motors normally wouldn’t go beyond 100k miles.
Jump ahead real quick to the early 90′s and any Gm product just isn’t worth a damn. You might say hey what about the trucks? okay,while not terrible and still mostly 350 powered,and capable of a much longer life than in 1968 due to tighter tolerances, again,things that just should not fail, do! Rear ends,interior door panels breaking off,premature failure of routine parts such as master cylinders and heater cores etc. you get the picture.
I have also had to deal with many Hondas and Mazdas. while not all of them are good cars,particularly the Honda’s made in Canada,some were truly stand out vehicles. 79-85 or “first gen Rx-7′s” being one of them. I have seen really amazing things with these cars. Again,little thing’s most people wouldn’t even notice. Heater/coolant hoses that have lasted the entire life span of the original motors,which often can exceed 300k miles. They were oil leaker’s for sure. The window regulators like to fail,but those little 12 a rotary’s That you can literally pick up by yourself just love to run! And my god will they take some heavy abuse! An old friend of mine turned his into a spec 7 car and entered many scca road races. 350k miles later he finally had to search for a motor. The car’s handle like a dream,especially with some light modification’s and fit you like a glove. When I sold my last one,it still had the original radiator,and about 250k miles of very hard driving.
2 May, 2010 at 12:13 am
Oh. There was a point to my overly long comment about car’s. It is this. Since about 1969,everything in this country has gradually declined. Car styling and quality being one of the smaller thing’s Ive noticed. There have of course been technological advancements but honestly, most of them so full of flaws in there implementation that they really are a joke.Quality control has become non existent due to muds running the lines, white’s becoming to greedy, and the companies themselves being hurt by the lack of pride whites used to show in their handywork as well as massive greed on their part to. Why do you suppose that is? hmmm…That’s not even a question worth asking.
2 May, 2010 at 8:39 am
The low point for American cars was the 1980s. Remember the Omni and the Probe? Like Jim says, the quality, engineering and styling of American cars started going downhill around 40 years ago. The Maverick, Pinto, Mustang II, Grenada….Lame.
2 May, 2010 at 2:28 pm
Inflation Adjusted Gasoline Prices
Year Price
1958 $2.24
1968 $2.11
1978 $2.16
1988 $1.75
1998 $1.35
2008 $3.23
2009 $2.28
So if the long term average price is $2.37 then in 1988 gas was very cheap and in 1978 it was only slightly below average but in 1981 and in 2008 it was extremely expensive on a historical basis.
A friend had an RX2 Mazda (’71) and RX4 wagon. Great cars, powerful, smooth like a turbine.
My daily driver is a ’67 Caprice. Rebuilt engine with 76cc heads to run low octane gas. Disc brakes in front. A6 A/C compressor (GM still makes them). I use a blend of propane and iso-butane as refrigerant.
Parts are readily available- new windshield $173 installed. ’85 Camaro alloy rims. 4 door hardtop.
No rust here in Aztlan.
2 May, 2010 at 2:50 pm
“My daily driver is a ‘67 Caprice……….new windshield $173 installed. ‘85 Camaro alloy rims. 4 door hardtop.
No rust here in Aztlan.”
Eez eet a low rider, homes? Chu know, weeth the fuzzy dice and the leetle chain steering wheel? And does eet go up and down, too? You can reely eempress las mujeras weeth that, homes, tu sabes?
3 May, 2010 at 12:36 am
At least in Aztlan you don’t have to worry about emissions past 1974. That’s all I have to say about that. Too bad it’s a four door.
I was just talking to my wife about her gung ho marine republican family. I don’t care how many times we go over it,I still cannot comprehend how someone with half a brain can fall into the mainstream lies. To deny nature simply because your taught it isn’t nice/P.C . Nature is the law! To deny her is to deny yourself.
Maybe if you started an argument with someone and based it purely on logic,then led up to race providing all of the necessary logical point’s. Oh wait, I have tried that already,damn. Retards.
The saddest observation I have made yet is that this site shouldn’t even exist. It’s existence is actually moronic. All of us here,talking about facts and discussing such obvious problems is so fucking retarded. The irony kicks in hard,like the secondaries on a 4bbl carb. It is,unfortunately necessary in this sick world for us to state the obvious and keep explaining to the world that,red is red,white is white and up is up while down is indeed still down.And so, as rediculous as it should be in a sane world,again,I am thankful for VNN and the opportunity to vent,and be grounded.
3 May, 2010 at 12:49 am
Part of the reasoning I use to justify my own comments is this. When a simple fact is expressed by various people,it can take on new meaning. I firmly believe this. In fact I view DR Pierce as a master of this. He wouldn’t say anything new,but would put it into new words. People can read something like a simple fact until they are blue in the face, but sometimes someone else might be able to get through a little better. Slightly different wording and delivery in particular can have profound results on someone’s comprehension.Yet another reason why this site is so valuable and a small lesson on how we can really learn from each other.
3 May, 2010 at 12:54 am
@Kuda
If you are in Aztlan as I used to be,I hope you attend the highland games in Vista. The pipebands alone are worth it. I couldnt hack it down there anymore.
Up here we have a nice Irish festival in the rockies. Look it up. An Ri Ra Butte Mt.
3 May, 2010 at 4:35 pm
“The saddest observation I have made yet is that this site shouldn’t even exist. It’s existence is actually moronic. All of us here,talking about facts and discussing such obvious problems is so fucking retarded. It is,unfortunately necessary in this sick world for us to state the obvious …”
How right you are. This shouldn’t even be necessary. Unfortunately though, it is.
I am continuously amazed at all the controversy that’s going on over “illegal immigration” (which is not even “immigration” at all, but invasion). Should we enforce the law , or should we not? Should we arrest them and deport them; or should we give them citizenship and let them vote?
Huh? How can there be any question about this? Since when is obeying the law a personal option? Since when do authorities get the choice of whether to enforce the law or not, at their own personal whim? When did this notion come about?
If so, do we all get to choose what laws we’ll obey and what laws we won’t? That’s the end of civilized society; and that’s the end of this country.
3 May, 2010 at 6:47 pm
“Dave Says:
2 May, 2010 at 12:13 am
Oh. There was a point to my overly long comment about car’s. It is this. Since about 1969,everything in this country has gradually declined. Car styling and quality being one of the smaller thing’s Ive noticed. ”
*****************
Everything started to suck after the miniskirt went out of fashion. When was that, around 1974?
12 May, 2010 at 9:33 pm
“Speech criminal” Bill White has been transferred to FCI Beckley to serve his sentence. His new address is:
William A. White #13888-084
FCI Beckley
Federal Correction Institute
P.O. Box 350
Beaver, W.V. 25813