U.S. Supreme Court Nominee Creates Historical First
Posted by Socrates in dispossession & destruction, Diversity, diversity is hate, General Decline, genocide of White culture, jewed culture, jewed law, Jewish genetics, Max Horkheimer, Socrates, Supreme Court at 2:05 pm | 
Permanent Link
(above: Horkheimer)
The ghost of Max Horkheimer says: “Oy, oy, oy veh! What a glorious and historic moment! We Jews hit the jackpot with this nomination. Let’s take a look: 1) We’re getting another Jew onto the Supreme Court; 2) We’re getting another female onto the Court; 3) But best of all – are you ready? – this will mark the first time in history that the Supreme Court is majority-non-White! Yep, of the 9 justices, 5 will be non-White [1]. Can you believe it? I had to pinch myself to make sure I wasn’t dreaming this (which really didn’t work, since I’m a ghost, heh, heh). White people, now it’s official. You’ve been completely disenfranchised, and it’s all perfectly legal. Ha, ha!”
More about Kagan: [Here].
[1] Newbies, Jews aren’t genetically White, even though they appear White. In addition to Kagan, Ginsburg and Breyer are also Jews. Thomas is, of course, Black and Sotomayor is Puerto Rican
10 May, 2010 at 2:17 pm
Jews make up 2-3% of the US population. Assuming Kagan’s confirmation, the US Supreme Court will be 33.33% JEW. What is wrong with this picture?? America is doomed. It is over. Turn out the lights.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
26 
0
10 May, 2010 at 2:21 pm
The old pro-White American Republic has been dead for at least a hundred years. If anybody still thinks that the White man can still take back this country, I got a bridge in Brooklyn I want to sell him. I frankly doubt if our Race has a future anywhere in the Western Hemisphere. At this point, the establishment of a White homeland somewhere in Eastern Europe appears to be the only alternative we have left.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
1
10 May, 2010 at 2:48 pm
“Help Wanted, no whites need apply” coming to a country near you.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
0
10 May, 2010 at 3:46 pm
“With Stevens’ retirement, for the first time in history the court will have no Protestants, the most prevalent denomination in the United States.”
Three Jews and no Protestants? Is ANYBODY ever going to wake up and take notice of this? Have we become a nation of sleepwaking zombies? Are we paralyzed?
The Jews are getting more brazen all the time. They used to — at one time — try to disguise themselves and keep a low profile in the shadows, but now they don’t even bother to hide anymore. That reveals the extent of their present self-assurance. It’s arrogance, really, to impose themselves on the country this way.
Note that I don’t even write this as a practicing Christian, being entirely indifferent on the matter of religion (so you could hardly find a more tolerant, unbiased person on this subject than I) …. but, hey, in a predominantly Protestant country, wouldn’t you expect to find at least SOME Protestants on the Supreme Court? In Israel, would you have a Supreme Court with no Jews?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
22 
0
10 May, 2010 at 3:54 pm
Yes, yes, I know — it’s “sleep-walking”, not “waking”.
My apologies to those who would suffer apoplexy.
(Sure hope I spelled apoplexy right!)
10 May, 2010 at 4:05 pm
She-he is the one of the most repulsive Jewesses I have seen in a long time. Itz Jon Lovitz in drag!!!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
0
10 May, 2010 at 4:37 pm
It appears that this nominee is pretty awful and not just from a looks standpoint. I heard her speaking on the radio today and she’s definitely a radical social Marxist, not that anybody in the mainstream political scene isn’t. More of the same crap from the “system”.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
1
10 May, 2010 at 6:17 pm
Why get downhearted? At least the enemy is now clearly visible. Race traitors such as ‘justice’ Earl Warren used to front for them, now the jew is center stage and even the lemmings should be able to see the coming agenda.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
0
10 May, 2010 at 6:31 pm
Her looks are the least thing that scare me.
Do note that she is from Harvard Law School.
It should be clear by now that Harvard has become a nest of radical Jews who are taking over this country. Well, at least they’re out in the open now. As CW says, “the Jew is now center stage” and everyone should be able to see them.
If nobody notices this, the whole damn country must be blind.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14 
0
10 May, 2010 at 7:11 pm
My only consolation is the Oklahoma Senator Jim Inhofe was the one straight forward person among the Republicans:”Sen. James M. Inhofe, R-Okla., said flatly that he would oppose Kagan. He said she had shown “seeming contempt” for the Senate confirmation process and a “lack of impartiality when it comes to those who disagree with her position.”
Deport that bitch back to Televitz Shitreal
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
0
10 May, 2010 at 7:15 pm
BTW Jim Inhofe was never a lawyer, but an airline pilot. Go figure
10 May, 2010 at 7:28 pm
Shhhh…Listen hear, Jim believes in racial and ethnic profiling’ now that scary if you have a camel face , rat like incisors, and heavy drooping sleepy-time eyelids
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
10 May, 2010 at 7:54 pm
Maybe the Protocols are really true, sure as hell looks like the jews are appointing a true blue-jew to the throne room, I mean not even a whiff of any gentile contamination or name changing . Ummm you say we now have 3 jews on the court that gives some credibility to this excerpt from the Protocols:
. Only the king and the three who stood sponsor for him will know what is coming.
“and while the king was looking down the jester stole his thorny crown, the court room was adjourned, no verdict was returned”
10 May, 2010 at 8:29 pm
The good thing about this is that when the supreme court ok’s unconstitutional laws, whites will oppose it more and increasingly see the jewishness of the tyranny. It’s a lot better having an actual jew on the supreme court pushing an anti-white position than someone white, which creates cognitive dissonance in the white populace.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
0
10 May, 2010 at 9:22 pm
Maybe America is doomed, maybe it’s already dead. If indeed it isn’t a fact already, it’s an event that has become something to look forward to. The country is not the race, nor is it even the nation. We’re the nation. Are all the doomsayers going to yell “Nigger” in Compton or Roxbury or follow a Doh to their oblivion? If not, then shut up and make the most of what we have now. I am a life-long depressive and have had to fight to see the bright side of things all of my life. My existence, like so many of you here I’m sure..has been turned upside-down in the past few years. While it’s been a daunting task to adjust to it all, it’s also made it very clear to me what I must do for myself NOW and how I can best protect myself and my own into the future. No, I won’t be speculating in gold & silver, thanks…that’ll do ya’ a lot of good when the shit hits the fan.
Lighten up, fer Woden’s sake..another Chersen Pipple on the SC is a GOOD thing. Unless of course you are still one of those mischlings (and in this case that means an NS that still thinks we can vote our way out) who bemoan this as another nail in the coffin of ‘merica. To quote another Chosen P, stick a fork in it, it’s done.
One good laugh I had over this episode…I saw that gal (?) on the J-Box and thought, “Holy Shit, Marty Allen is the new justice”?
“Face Brutto”, is what the Italians say, I think Talk about the provebial “Map of Israel”….gads!
10 May, 2010 at 9:27 pm
The decline of the Western people commenced after the WWII and was mainly due to the Nazi atrocities, which cast dark shadow of doubt on the West’s glorious history and its greatest achievements. That doubt dampened Europe’s (and America’s too, to a lesser extent) confidence, energy, and cultural pride. So, if you, Nazi sympathizers, are looking for the culprit, it is you and your heroes. There has been no successful civilization in human history that was based chiefly on the concept of race. And who are white people? Are Russians white? Are Polish people white? Hitler did not think so.
Now, according to Watson, Murray, and other researchers, Ashkenazi Jews are the smartest ethnic group in the World, by far. This is why they dominate fields of science, finance, medicine, and law, to name a few. If they are not white, then YOUR white race is a secondary one. You obviously can not learn lessons of the past, or take an example of a small group’s ability to withstand vastly more numerous enemies. Or at least to realize that if you love “your race” you should make more of it.
As far as Kagan’s nomination, I vehemently oppose it, but this is not a Jewish issue at all, the only thing you can see
10 May, 2010 at 9:45 pm
It doesn’t matter who is on the Supreme Court. The entire Federal governemnt is a fraud. The Constitution is whatever those judges in costumes say it is.
The checks and balances consist of 3 federal branches. It’s a classic case of the fox guarding the henhouse. The only real check on the Federals was the authority of the states which was destroyed a long time ago.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
0
10 May, 2010 at 10:07 pm
The nazis sure knew how to deal with the Kagans of this world.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
1
10 May, 2010 at 10:08 pm
I used to be impressed with academic credentials like the kind that the ugly lesbo Jewess Kagan has. But then I realized that all those once-elite schools like Harvard and Princeton are now nothing more than Jew-controlled, Jew-infested ghettoes.
Once again, Barry Sotero has shown that he is nothing more than a Steppin’ Fetchit for his Jew masters/Jew owners. He obviously has nothing but the lowest, meanest Mulatto contempt for White America.
One Mestiza, one Jew, two Jewesses and a Negro now sit on the Supreme Court. Whitey, your days are numbered unless you do something about this.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
1
10 May, 2010 at 10:10 pm
“J.J Says:
10 May, 2010 at 10:07 pm
The nazis sure knew how to deal with the Kagans of this world.”
********
I wish that were true, but the Nazis were too nice to the Jews, too acommodating. I think a better example of how the Jews ought to be treated comes from the Cossacks.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
1
10 May, 2010 at 10:47 pm
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=1129096#post1129096
10 May, 2010 at 10:48 pm
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=1129096#post1129096
Well, how interesting.
10 May, 2010 at 11:05 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CS9OO0S5w2k
YMCA!!!!
http://www.newnation.vg/forums/showthread.php?t=175349
——————————————————————————–
Their colors fly openly.
Ours are now in the closet.
Read Alexanader Solzhenitsyn’s warning’s.
http://www.newnation.vg/forums/showthread.php?t=168548
http://www.newnation.vg/forums/showthread.php?t=169580
11 May, 2010 at 12:20 am
That’s the fugliest kike dyke since….Ruth Millhouse Ginsburg. Maybe “she” can hook-up with “Chaz” Bono…..
Piss on the Burrhead-in-Chief from a great height.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
0
11 May, 2010 at 1:11 am
Their colors fly openly.
Ours are now in the closet.
Read Alexanader Solzhenitsyn’s warning’s.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
11 May, 2010 at 1:31 am
Mel Brooks says:
“Lighten up, fer Woden’s sake..another Chersen Pipple on the SC is a GOOD thing. Unless of course you are still one of those mischlings (and in this case that means an NS that still thinks we can vote our way out) who bemoan this as another nail in the coffin of ‘merica. To quote another Chosen P, stick a fork in it, it’s done.”
Completely agree. I was revolted by this new kike nominee to the court, not because I have any sort of illusions about the country and who runs it, but because it is one UGLY Jewess. This country is done, all that we can do is grab a beer (or any beverage of choice) and watch it self destruct. Hopefully we can do something with what remains. Now I’m not advocating sitting back while you or your family are in danger, I’m just saying that if you aren’t directly involved, revolution is a spectator sport.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
11 May, 2010 at 1:34 am
“[1] Newbies, Jews aren’t genetically White, even though they appear White.”
Well, over the past 1,000 years or so, many of the Jews living in Europe have absorbed some of the White DNA around them, just like the Jews living in Central Asia over the centuries have absorbed some of the local Turkic Mongol and Tartar DNA. But of course Jews are no more White than Vanessa Williams or Colin Powell are. They certainly don’t think like us. And perhaps most of importantly of all, they do not consider themselves to be White.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
0
11 May, 2010 at 2:41 am
One more reason to take out the thrash!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
11 May, 2010 at 6:38 am
Have no doubt that she will be confirmed by a wide margin. Not only will we be so lucky to have three jewbies on the supreme court, but all three are radical leftist/anti-white/Marxist types. Gee, what are the odds?
If there are any “good” Jews then wouldn’t we get lucky at least once or twice? At least that’s a question for jew worshipping Rush Limbaugh and the crowd at FOXman news.
Talmudic law has finally flexed it’s muscles in America.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
0
11 May, 2010 at 8:25 am
Have no doubt that she will be confirmed by a wide margin. Not only will we be so lucky to have three jewbies on the supreme court, but all three are radical leftist/anti-white/Marxist types. Gee, what are the odds?
**************************************************
Can you imagine now, who’ll be writing the dissenting opinion?
Oh vey sorry to say the right honorable judge Scalia, had to be with his family more often, so we just wrote what we thought he would say. Itz all perfectly kosher. Trust us
11 May, 2010 at 8:36 am
The Supreme court has always been the designated hit target for Jews in their grasp for the noose to hang us with, I’d say more than economics, or legislation. From the perch in the court system they can look down their peaks in all solemity like a pack of Yahves vultures. oh and indeed they want to judge the nations.. The jews won’t be satisfied though with just 3 on the perch, look for more creative ways to add more court members.. Expand their judicial powers more effectively over state legislative bodies.
11 May, 2010 at 12:41 pm
The war is NOT against people with white skin. The war for jews is against Anglo/Aryan white people whom they intend to breed out of existance. It was always about that in Eastern Europe and Western Russia. Hitler invaded Russia partly to avenge the anglo/aryan peoples who were starved to death or outright murdered by the Russian Jews and free the others who were being persecuted…
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
1
11 May, 2010 at 11:00 pm
Slightly off topic, but I have no delusions. I also think that the country is heading towards a major train wreck, and there probably isn’t a whole lot we can do about it. It’s a shame, but the the entire Southern portion of the United States will probably be lost. Some northern states with harsh climates and a larger white population may be able to form some sort of confederation after “the fall”. If this happens, this new, Northern Confederation will have to be much different in it’s founding and outlook than the America which has taken shape since 1776. We’ll have to be much more militant and venerate things like “blood and soil” rather than a “Constitution”, which so many of our kinsman mistakenly do today.
11 May, 2010 at 11:40 pm
I have to disagree with you a little, JH. I see the possibility of the Confederacy coming back to life and throwing off the yoke of Northern Yankee/Union occupation, whereas the North gets swamped by Muds and turns into a giant slum. But who knows how it will all shake out? It will be interesting to see what happens next.
12 May, 2010 at 12:27 am
Blackshirt Says:
10 May, 2010 at 4:05 pm
She-he is the one of the most repulsive Jewesses I have seen in a long time. Itz Jon Lovitz in drag!!!
LOL!!!!!!!! And yeah, Jon Lovitz in drag playing the (blatantly ill-named) Tommy Flanagan, the Pathological Liar.
Tommy Flanagan–MY ASS! Jon’s character should’ve been more in line with his ethnic affiliation and his tribe’s age-old, shameless, notorious, congential modus operandi; perhaps Hyman Goldberg the Pathological Liar or any or a number of Jewey names.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturday_Night_Live_characters_appearing_on_Weekend_Update
Jon
12 May, 2010 at 12:41 am
Ein Says:
10 May, 2010 at 3:46 pm
“Three Jews and no Protestants? Is ANYBODY ever going to wake up and take notice of this? Have we become a nation of sleepwaking zombies? Are we paralyzed?”
WE, meaning folks like US, notice for sure. That’s why we’re here! However, for the great mAsses of stupid, unconcerned mAsses, no, they don’t give a f*ck much less are a aware of it. For them it’s life as usual, i.e., beer, TV, sports, porn, and every other sort of self-indulgence you can imagine. How tragic for US to be dragged down by these dopey, unconcerned sh*theads.
“The Jews are getting more brazen all the time. They used to — at one time — try to disguise themselves and keep a low profile in the shadows, but now they don’t even bother to hide anymore. That reveals the extent of their present self-assurance. It’s arrogance, really, to impose themselves on the country this way.”
Yeah, tell me about it! Historically, this usually preceded their well-deserved comeuppance. But in this dumbed-down, deracinated, degenerate, lazy-ass ‘kwa, I dunno…
Keep your fingers crossed.
Jon
12 May, 2010 at 1:02 am
Tim McGreen Says:
11 May, 2010 at 1:34 am
“But of course Jews are no more White than Vanessa Williams or Colin Powell are. They certainly don’t think like us. And perhaps most of importantly of all, they do not consider themselves to be White.”
You got that right! Marxist/lesbian Jew-bitch Susan Sontag certainly wasn’t talking about herself and her kin when she vomited this bigoted statement:
“The white race is the cancer of human history.”
In reality, her statement was self-projection,* for as history and experience plainly (and painfully) shows, she was describing herself and her pestiferous tribe.
Jon
*Psychological projection or projection bias (including Freudian Projection) is the unconscious act of denial of a person’s own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, such as to the weather, the government, a tool, or to other people. Thus, it involves imagining or projecting that others have those feelings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
12 May, 2010 at 1:33 am
Jon, you’re right about the Jews’ amazing ability to condemn others for what they themselves are guilty of. The Jews always accuse the Germans of considering themselves to be The Master Race. But it’s the Jews who regard themselves as Masters over the other races. They condemn the Moslems for being terrorists, when it was Zionist terror groups like the Stern Gang and Irgun that founded the Jewish State in Palestine. They campaigned against segregation in the South, yet their Jew State in Palestine is totally based on racism and segregation.
Examples of Jewish hypocrisy and “projection” are almost endless……………….The Jews may think of themsleves as being very clever, but in reality they are very, very predictable. And hateful.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
12 May, 2010 at 8:33 am
Actually, when you stop to think of it,
The Chosen People = The Master Race. No difference!
But the Jews have the nerve to accuse the Germans!
What hypocrites.
The Jews came up with the idea long, long before Hitler ever lived.
12 May, 2010 at 11:47 am
Jim Says:
10 May, 2010 at 2:21 pm
The old pro-White American Republic has been dead for at least a hundred years. If anybody still thinks that the White man can still take back this country, I got a bridge in Brooklyn I want to sell him. I frankly doubt if our Race has a future anywhere in the Western Hemisphere. At this point, the establishment of a White homeland somewhere in Eastern Europe appears to be the only alternative we have left.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 10 0
Un-qoute
The mixed race enemy alien’s and the Chicom’s will/have taken over.
I will guess that the Japanese leaders have been weighing our demise for for a few decades and preparing to get them selves the best deal they can.
In the early 1980′s all who screamed against our de industrialization were laughed at and we were told the US would sell tech know how and services. That dirty manufactoring would been done over seas.
That BS I would assume came right out of NYC’s Crime Street den of criminals and by their collaborator’s in the media of that time.
A race that can not see racial realities at this stage and has a large percentage of its folk watching TV and allowing their children thanks to brainwashing and single parents to serve Rome’s Legions are perhaps doomed.
Hope some how to pull out of this mess.
Bottom line is everthing almos is Asian made, and the Asian’s are not fooling around with P.C. Hollywood shit.
12 May, 2010 at 12:24 pm
Jew Fritz Perls, gestalt therapist, was obsessed with projection. He claimed almost everything people say is projection, and that objectivity is impossible. Of course, this is true for jews. He was indoors at beautiful Big Sur (which should be for Whites only), practicing jew fraud called “psychotherapy.” Another racket for the jews, as Soprano’s mother put it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8P4-qhWSUk0
13 May, 2010 at 1:51 pm
Here’s a song parody I composed about Jewish people denying their power and influence over the U.S. population. Sung to the tune “Good King Wencesslas”, in a VERY Chicago/Bronx/Russian Mafia accent..
“Vwee don’t rrun yourr media, vwee don’t rrun yourr cohwuts!
Vwee don’t rrun Congrress, Porrn, Fed, don’t make a dime on tohwuts
Vwee arre veectums of vwhite males, those beegits hite ourr guts
So vwee starrted both vwoild vwars? Vwee needed census cuts
Vwee vwerre not the Bolsheviks, vwee neverr hoit a fly
So Kulaks who cohwut ourr trricks mysterriously died?
Those Gulags vwerre a Stalin tool, Jews neverr vwerre arround
So the Commissarrs, vwerre Jews? They vwerre out of town
Now yourr nation’s falterring, yourr faggots vwant to vwed
Yourr vwimmen arre litigious qveens, yourr Beel of Rrights is dead
And only Jews arre prrotected vwith lowahs vwee make ourrselves
Goyim strruggle to surrvive in Neo-Bolshevik made Hell”
13 May, 2010 at 2:23 pm
David Baker, that song of yours, like the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, is a “forgery”.
13 May, 2010 at 4:56 pm
Tim, it is amazing how the media puts on kid gloves when someone like this obvious Jew is trying to increase their imposing presence within our power structure. She’s a lesbian, for sure (Just as Janet Reno was ‘not’ a lesbian..) She sure-as-Hell looks like a Jew, though no mention is made of her ethnic/religious persuasion. (Only males who appear white and espouse conservative principles are grilled to ‘admit’ their pedigree) What people don’t know about Jews is exactly what they SHOULD know: Jewish history is replete with instances of Jewesses insinuating their tribe into the liberal/proletariot leadership. What follows is the disntegration of their host society with a progression of social unrest, tort, gender strife, political malfeasance, and, of course, laws that protect Jews from “Hate”.
13 May, 2010 at 11:16 pm
J.J.,
The Nazis mistreated Jewish people as much as they mistreated everyone else during their despotic reign. However, there is never any mention of the Jews declaring war on Germany, nor that they acted as what we today label “Enemy Combatants”. We can safely surmise that the end result of Jewish rule is either the economic, governmental and social destruction of their host nation, or the ouster of Jews. What should be considered as the measure of a viable society is their ability to recognize and reverse the insidious, predictable agendas of their Jewish population.
14 May, 2010 at 10:43 am
SLOW DOWN EVERYONE!!!!!!!!
Only about 5 percent of the country KNOWS she is a jew. And out of that 5 percent, only 0.0000001 percent have a problem with her being a jew.
This country is so stupid………………that if ALL jews started wearing yarmukas, it would take a decade for Americans to do anything about it. They would give the jews a lot of chances to screw up.
Imagine ALL the JEWS wearing yarmukas. You wouldnt see one white person on television or Obamas cabinet.
14 May, 2010 at 11:08 am
Justin Huber,
If you expand a little on the “Train Wreck” analogy, you may hit upon the people who engineer these economic/social disasters. In EVERY NATION Jews have operated, there were eventual “Train Wrecks”, blamed on everything and everyone except Jews. What is interesting about their tribe during these downturns is how they flaunt their affluence, notoriety and political power. In Russia, a nation destroyed by Jews, they have this one filthy rich post-economic debacle Jew who travels in his very own Boeing 737. While the goyim stare up at his luxurious flying limousine, their stomachs churn with hunger, and their souls are crushed with grinding poverty and hopeless dreams of future prosperity. Even their young women search for employment outside their borders (Israel is more than happy to accomodate them, inviting these naive girls to travel to their country for gainful employment, only to be forced into sexual slavery, bought and sold by Jewish pimps. You’ll notice how Jewish feminists in the U.S. scrupulously avoid discussing such a ‘touchy’ subject..) In Jewish cinema, starving goyim deal with economic depressions, while a highly educated Jew travels around the world in luxury, searching for ancient artifacts. It is clear their Talmud is a blueprint to create such economic disparity. Now, in the midst of yet another fiscal “Train Wreck”, we see more and more Jews vying for positions of power, and parading into awards banquets, opulent hotels for high-level business meetings, and writing books, traveling on speaking tours, media consulting, and otherwise getting their bulbous noses into the public eye. The more things Jewishly change, the more they Jewishly stay the same.
14 May, 2010 at 4:21 pm
Decades of jewshit propaganda has led everyone to believe jews are 3% of the US population. If you simply take a look at population centers around the US and jew numbers, you’ll begin to realize they are 6% or so of the US population, something even a few jew demographers believe (they in fact think the actual number is slightly higher!).
This has been going on in the US since the census began, with zhid leaders telling their flock to not mention they were monsters to the census takers. So that their numbers could be played down, in order to not panic the American public. It might not seem luck much, but that 3 – 4% difference means a lot. As we’re seeing.
14 May, 2010 at 8:08 pm
The Nazi’s were despotic in that they allowed personal caprice. But everyone must be the same. They must obey the rule of law. They must not make anything personal. They need to keep their heads down and not think for themselves. The middle class state demands it!
Phewh. It is always the middle-class shop keepers and share owners going on about the proleteriat. The prole knows what is his and would thank you to keep your dirty hands off it, the same with the noble man. It is always the middle-class sanctifying the state as a means to enflesh god as man the mediocre. What is affirmative action but the middle-class’ solution to the black problem? Just make them middle class like us.
The only thing the proles really want is the ability for a little caprice themselves, a little despotism.
http://www.dictionarist.com/Willk%C3%BCr
But there must be rules, must be laws, before which everyone must be equal. Equality is what it is about after all.
Anyone who follows his own despotism is a criminal. You may NOT govern yourself or you will be identified as an enemy against the nation, a criminal against the state, a sinner against the great middle-class god of MAN. Many a real man has been sacrificed before this sacred god.
What could be more offensive to middle-class tastes than the leadership principle? That one’s caprice might be tried in the public square. That again a man becomes a real man, and not a predicate made god, a predicate that against reality can be denied the blasphemy, that a man be deemed an un-man.
14 May, 2010 at 11:01 pm
Excellent comments, David Baker! I can’t imagine why anyone would give it a “no”. I gave it an emphatic “yes”.
As for the Nazis being “despotic”, we must bear in mind remembered that this was during a time of war, with Germany fighting enemies on both sides and most of the world allied against her. Even in the US and Britain there were wartime controls, rationing, etc. And you could hardly dare speak out freely if you were against the war. So who are we to call others “despotic”?
When you’re being bombed and starved and invaded and you’re surrounded by enemies who want you dead — of course you’re going to get rather strict and clamp down on opposition! Of course you’re going to impose martial law and round up subversives and hostile elements. Wouldn’t we too? It would have been interesting to see (mere speculation of course!) how things would have turned out in Germany if it had peace and no enemies, external or internal, plotting for its destruction. But Germany was not allowed that luxury.
14 May, 2010 at 11:26 pm
Hey, Lincoln was pretty despotic during the Civil War. And so were Wilson and FDR. The Colonial rebels committed a lot of atrocities in the Revolutionary War, especially in the Southern colonies. And the British were the first to put enemy civilians in concentration camps, during the Boer War. Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, Idi Amin….By comparison, I’d say the Nazis and the Kaiser were pretty tame.
15 May, 2010 at 5:21 am
During the Revolution, the British kept thousands of American prisoners in prison ships in New York harbor. The conditions were terrible, and many died from cold, hunger, or disease.
And during WW2, the British rounded up all enemy aliens (even refugees) and interned them. The entire Isle of Man was turned into a massive concentration camp (except that only bad guys have “concentration camps”; we, the good guys, call them “detention centers”). Oh, well, I won’t quibble over semantics. But anyway, you never hear anything about that. Have there ever been any movies made about “Escape from Hell on the Isle of Man”?
Of course not!!!
15 May, 2010 at 5:46 am
This fact (about internment on the Isle of Man) is very played down and it’s hard to find any information. [The Isle of Man is a large island in the Irish Sea.]
Looking up “Isle of Man”, just for curiousity’s sake, out of the extensive article in Wikipedia, I find just a single sentence on this subject!
“During both the First and Second World Wars, the island was used as a location for internment camps for Central Powers and Axis citizens, and suspected sympathisers, respectively.”
I find it particularly interesting to note that not only “sympathisers” were interned there, but even “SUSPECTED sympathisers”!
Obviously, Churchill and his backers were taking NO chances with anyone interferring their war effort.
15 May, 2010 at 12:04 pm
Silly Goyim, tricks are for Yids!
15 May, 2010 at 1:19 pm
Havanaglia! Havanglia! Planned your funeral ahead of time Whitey? Call the funeral home of your choice for pre- planning, its the smart thing to do!
15 May, 2010 at 5:06 pm
People keep on going on about the atomization of the individual, blah, blah, blah… but our problem isn’t too much diversity, it is too much conformity. The jews are orientalists, they wan’t one universal law, a world-wide confucianism. This played well into middle class sentiments. The middle class won the Cromwellian revolution. The middle class won the french revolution. They want order. Their enemies are the lower class and the upper classes. They had to be tamed. The communists found out our caucasian lower orders don’t care for one size fits all and threw of the communist yoke. They would throw of the middle class yoke too, if they could be found.
The jewish confucianists aren’t worried by the middle class, but yokels, the white trash, and an arising white nobility that combines individuality with community, a common law as opposed to an enshrined fixed idee.
15 May, 2010 at 6:18 pm
Linder keeps on whining on about christianity, but the only thing wrong with christianity is that it has been co-opted by the middle-class. An atheist middle-class would act in the same way. Stability is its key word. Business as usual. Our business is business. So they will see the world fall around their ears as they try and hold the shit together.
They will support the jewish state of affairs because business is business and even their relation with their god takes on the form of a business transaction. If horses had a god he would look like a horse. Identifying white interests with the middle-class is our death rattle. They are our oriental class, our feminine class, our preservationist order. Their victory was this civilisation’s downfall.
15 May, 2010 at 9:08 pm
A., there is far more wrong with christianity than the fact that it has been co-opted by the middle class. For working class Whites, christianity is even more of a disaster, because it encourages them to be passive in the face of exploitation by jews and fat cat white race traitors, who will gladly sacrifice them to the niggers and spics for the sake of higher profiits. Christianity is the best scheme the jews ever had to pull the wool over the eyes of the “goyim”.
15 May, 2010 at 9:57 pm
Jim,
I think you missed the whole point of Christianity. That religious order believes in Christ: That he existed, and will reappear in some future era when the world is prepared. Like any other sect, there are believers, doubters, denouncers and analysts. Jews do believe in Christ, but only as an enemy of their cult. They spit at the cross. They believe Christ is boiling in excrement. Christians are sheep, parading around with knees bent in supplication to a heretical pariah. Personally, I wouldn’t put too much stock in what Jews say or do about any religious figure. Their Rabbis will teach them to believe they are superior to all of God’s creations.
16 May, 2010 at 1:03 am
I don’t believe in jeboo, but attacking it as an inversion of reality is crass as everything is just a tool for the will to work its pleasure, science becomes a sacredness that will rule over us no less dogmaticaly than some jeboo myth. But Jim, the working class aren’t the fools you believe. They live closer to reality than the middle class and jeboo or labcoat they will have their pound of flesh too. It was the working class that fought on racial lines, defending their patch of ground, and it was the middle class who sold them out as intractable usurpers. Consider the off shoring of jobs. It certainly transfered a problem for the middle class, or did it?
So all you weak thinkers, bourgouise cattle traders, defenders of the status quo, sans jew (as if that was possible), stop and think, consider your life as a cog in the machine.
Linder still hasn’t got it with some idea of a guide book on how to be White !?! White is a predicate, you either are or you are not. It belongs to the essence. The opposite of despotic is dogmatic. I reject your middle class orientalism and your attempt to defend it by pushing the blame off on christianity when christianity was not a problem until the middle class became the ruling elite and made common cause with their oriental mates the jew.
16 May, 2010 at 1:28 am
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing; and I do think you’ve gong overboard with this. You do have a certain point, though. But I don’t care for your vision of returning to a ,edieval-type strict order of a “ruling elite” and a mass of sheepish peasants.
When society is restored to a tiny Ruling Elite and a milling mass of sheep, which group do you think YOU will be in, Mr.A? Don’t kid yourself, now!
And which group do you think the Jews will be in?
In fact, that kind of social order seems to be where we’re heading as of now. And the prospects don’t look good. Not for our kind, that is. Why do you think the Jews are pushing so hard for it?
16 May, 2010 at 1:46 am
Meant to say: “I do think you’re going overboard on this.”
I will allow, though, that the modern middle class has proven easier to control. Aside from education and propaganda, they can be controlled through money. People have to hang onto their salaries and worry about their pensions. So they suppress their anger and behave. The Jews have you by your purse strings!
You don’t see middle class people rioting in the streets, although ghetto types do. Middle class people have invested so many years of their lives into that precious pension, and they can’t afford to lose it now. And they still owe money on their mortgage and their car, and they’re deep in debt putting Junior through college so that he can get a good job and live the same way they have (they hope). So they grit their teeth and shut up and carry on.
By contrast, the medieval peasants had a pogrom every now and then, when things got too bad to bear. But they didn’t have to worry about pensions and car payments and mortgages. They had nothing, so they had nothing to lose. Therefore, they could afford to riot. Today, people can’t.
The main difference, though, was that those peasants didn’t have TV (and other MSM “entertainment”) to keep them in line. The only thing that kept them under control was the Church. But that proved to be not so effective, in the long run, as non-stop 24-hour electronic “entertainment” cum propaganda beamed right into the home. A sermon just once a week can’t compare with that. The TV tube is today’s equivalent of the pulpit. But the modern version of control is far more thorough and sophisticated.
16 May, 2010 at 1:47 am
A. makes an intersting argument, but I don’t believe for a second that any great revolution of any kind will ever emerge from the ranks of the bourgeoisie. They are hopeless. All the great men of history either came from the landed gentry/aristocracy, like Napoleon, Bolivar, Alexander and Washington, or they came from the lower classes, like Hitler and Stalin. The bourgeoisie never produced anyone great, just lots of mediocrity.
16 May, 2010 at 1:55 am
I am not suggesting the eradication of an important part of our social structure. Just a return to their proper place. Sooner or later an agreement will have to be made with the middle class so they can carry on with their business and we can tidy up their mess but their hand will need be forced in some way or the other, just as it was in Germany.
16 May, 2010 at 4:14 am
“All the great men of history either came from the landed gentry/aristocracy, like Napoleon, Bolivar, Alexander and Washington, or they came from the lower classes, like Hitler and Stalin. The bourgeoisie never produced anyone great, just lots of mediocrity.”
What Tim says is true.
But be careful about underestimating your enemy!
Napoleon contemptuously dismissed the English as “a nation of Shopkeepers”. And maybe so. Nonetheless, they were the ones who put an end to him.
16 May, 2010 at 4:37 am
What about the Prussians?
16 May, 2010 at 6:00 am
The Prussians gave us Frederick the Great, Bismarck, the Brandenburg Gate, Berlin, Sans Souci and CPE Bach, so they are alright in my book….No mediocrity to be found there!
16 May, 2010 at 6:21 am
You’re right, Henry, the middle class cling to their bourgeois respectablilty and to their possessions at all costs, whereas the niggers in the ghetto have nothing to lose by rioting. But the Blacks are so dumb that the riots they start only wind up making things worse for them. I would have had a lot of respect for the niggers if their 1993 Rodney King riot had spread into Hollywood, Los Feliz and Beverly Hills instead of being confined to South Central LA. Imagine if that would have happened! Naturally, the cops and the politicians would done everything they could to protect all those wealthy Whites and Jews from harm, no doubt about it. That’s what cops and politicians are for, to protect and to serve the rich and powerful.
The Blacks have had numerous opportunities to start a revolution in this country and they have bungled every single one of those opportunities. The White working class came close to revolution during the Depression, but foolishly allowed themselves to be bought off with FDR’s Jew Deal and WWII. If there’s any chance at all of a White revolution, it will have to come from the White working class. They are the ones who have been screwed over by the government and big business more than anyone else.
16 May, 2010 at 9:28 am
A. says “But Jim, the working class are not the fools you believe”. I beg your pardon, A. but I never insinuated any such thing. I totally agree with Tim McGreen that any chance of White revolution will have to come from the White working class. I only made the point that chriistianity is toxic to the working class as it dampers their natural spirit of resistance to the jew money system that exploits them on a daily basis.
16 May, 2010 at 11:19 am
The Movement that spawned the Great White Revolution of 1933 was originally named “The National Socialist German WORKERS Party. Lets never forget it. The NS had a aristocracy to be sure, but it was an aristocracy of intelligence and manliness; not of class. Many former marxist joined the NS when they saw the Light and often rose to high Party positions. The main supporters of NS during its early days were small business men, small merchants, and the most aware members of the working class. One could argue endlessly about the relative merits of the Strasserites vs the Hitlerites, but National Socialism was anti-bourgeois from the gitgo.
16 May, 2010 at 2:21 pm
The white middle and upper classes have been thooroughly brainwashed and poisoned by years of university education. They seem to be a lost cause. They also have no understanding of real life in the real world, as it affects most people.
That leaves the lower classes. Thank goodness, they are at least a little less brainwashed with PC ideals and diversity. They also know what real life is about.
Unfortunately, history shows that lower-class rebellions have a very low rate of success. (Offhand, I can’t think of any.) Spartacus, Wat Tyler, Pugachev, and so on, all failed…. I could compile a list. Their odds just are not good. They almost always need some disaffected members of the upper classes to lead them.
16 May, 2010 at 2:51 pm
It doesn’t really matter what class a Leader comes from. The greatest Leader of all time, Adolf Hitler came from the lower middle class. A potential Leader of a new White Nationalist Revolution could could from any class or from any White nation. It is not social class that determines fitness to lead, but the Aryan virtues of intelligence, honor, and courage.
16 May, 2010 at 9:14 pm
Jim, if you believe Hitler was “The Greatest Leader of All Time”, you surely have hitched your wagon to a falling star. Hitler was not only a despotic narcissist, he played on the emotions and anger of the German people to gain their support for wars they would live to regret. I agree Hitler was not the mass murderer of Jewish people, but he DID MURDER JEWISH PEOPLE! HE MURDERED AMERICANS. HE MURDERED POLES, FRENCH, RUSSIANS, NORTH AFRICANS, ETC, ETC, ETC!!!!! Without the singularly bellicose efforts of that strutting tyrant, WWII would have been confined to China, Russia and Japan.
16 May, 2010 at 9:43 pm
David, it wasn’t Hitler that wanted war. The jews declared war on Germany in 1933. Hitler based his new economic system on the productivity of the German worker, and completely eliminated the jewish usury system. That was the primary reason that Hitler and his system had to be destroyed. In regard to Hitler murdering Americans; he NEVER wanted to go to war with the U.S. Roosevelt tried his damnest to sucker the Germans into attacking American Ships in the Atlantic but the Germans didn’t swallow the bait. He finally was able to maneuver the japs to attack Pearl Harbor, thereby getting us into war through the back door. The REAL war mongers were Churchill, FDR, and Stalin. I may have hitched my wagon to a falling star, but that star will someday rise again. 14/88
16 May, 2010 at 10:43 pm
Jim,
War is a two-way street. One does not accept such a challenge as war on the condition that they are righteously entitled. There are alternatives to every facet of international conflicts; war being the absolute last resort. You are correct that Jews openly declared war on Germany in 1933. (This declaration is never discussed in the context of Holocaust history) Jews were not interested in combat with Germany, they were striving to populate Palestine. The presumption of Jewish combat worthiness is certainly open to debate. Zionists were working in conjunction with the Nazis to force the emigration of Jews from Europe. Where Hitler showed his true colors was when he redirected those people to squalid, poorly maintained concentration camps to labor in the adjacent war materiel factories. This was not in the agreement with Zionists, and the action clearly defined Hitler’s racist/despotic nature with regard to Europe’s Jewish population. It seems the man was flushed with power, notoriety (He was Time Magazine’s Man of the Year..) and an inner need for the adulation of his loyal subjects. Somewhere along the way, Hitler lost sight of the hard, cold reality that he had bitten off much more than he could chew.
17 May, 2010 at 12:11 am
David, accusing Hilter of “murder” is not, strictly speaking, accurate. He was the wartime leader of Germany. And in wars, people get killed. I don’t think he should ever have placed himself in charge of running Germany’s war effort, nor should he have ordered the attack on the USSR. But what’s done is done and now it’s OUR turn to start making history!
17 May, 2010 at 12:54 am
“Somewhere along the way, Hitler lost sight of the hard, cold reality that he had bitten off much more than he could chew.”
Indeed he did. Perhaps he got overly cocky after his initial stuffing successes (militarily). I’m baffled. As I’ve said before, in his MK, he lambasted the Central Powers (in WW1) for having taken on a war on two fronts, particularly with the British Empire and America. And then he ended up repeating the same disaster.
HHitler e was entirely European-oriented. He was not a worldly or traveled man, never having been outside of Europe, and hardly outside of Germany/Austria. (eg. His visit to Paris was just one day — in and out!) Therefore, he underestimated the rest of the world and overestimated Germany. Hitler particularly underestimated America’s productive potential. Being unworldly, he relied heavily on von Ribbentrop, who had lived in Canada and England and whom he considered cosmopolitan, to advise him on international affairs. But Ribbentrop was a self-promoting toady who told H. only what he thought H. wanted to hear.
Roosevelt and his gang of New York Jews were determined to get isolationist America into the war, somehow, by hook or by crook. Up against Roosevelt’s provocations, Hitler was in a very difficult position. He should have ignored them all and turned the other cheek, no matter how bitter a pill it was to swallow. He really had no other choice! There was no realistic option. Once he bit the bait, he had lost the war.
With America and most of the world allied against him, he was up against hopeless odds. From that moment on it was just a matter of time until the end. With Pearl Harbor and its aftermath, the Jews had won the war. All the other battles that came after were redundant. The writing was on the wall.
17 May, 2010 at 12:58 am
Perhaps he got overly cocky after his initial stuffing successes
I meant “initial stunning successes”. Sorry.
17 May, 2010 at 1:13 am
Operation Barbarossa is what sealed the Reich’s fate. Maybe if the attack had been launched a few weeks earlier and then concentrated on an all-out drive towards Moscow, it could have worked. But Hitler’s insistance on a three-pronged attack…We have all seen the results of that blunder.
Additionally, Hilter’s refusal to listen to his generals and field marshalls antagonized them a great deal. There was always a lot of hostility between the Nazi leadership and the Army leadership and apparently Hitler did almost nothing to deal with that.
But this is the year 2010, not 1943. So come on already, let’s deal with the present situation!
17 May, 2010 at 1:22 am
60 years of TV/movie brain washing along with Disgusting public schools has lead US to this of no privacy, and the death of the Bill Of Rights, especially the Fourth Amendment.
The mass murder and insurance fruad of 2001 has led US to what we have now, which is various NKVD outfits, that Stalin and Mao would have drolled over.
Every misfit and White hater can sue White’s for what ever the tax man does not get first.
17 May, 2010 at 9:29 am
The bottom line is that any country in the world that devises an economic system that bypasses the globalist jew capitalist usury system will be demonized and ultimately destroyed by the jews and their lackeys.
17 May, 2010 at 10:47 am
I agree with Jim’s point above. Hitler was trying to do this in Germany and it was probably a contributing factor (possibly the key factor) as to why the Germans found themselves taking on the rest of the world by later 1941.
17 May, 2010 at 12:00 pm
Generally, White working class people have simple answers to religion. Jesus was a Jew, Jews are God’s chosen people and to bless the Jews means blessings will come your way. If you ever criticize Israel or the Jewish people this is the reaction you will get with a stupid grin attached. How do you deal with this?
17 May, 2010 at 1:32 pm
You guys are not grasping the concept that Hitler was a ‘scarecrow’ fashioned by the Jews to make it appear their tribe was being racially forced from Europe. Let us recap Jewish history: The Pale of Settlement, The Warsaw Ghetto. Spain, England, Africa, Italy, Germany ad nauseum. Everywhere Jews assembled in numbers, they have been thrown out. Jews create ghettos, because their Talmud identifies them as a superior race. They create social strife, pitting race against race, gender against gender, religion against religion, and tyranny against freedom. (You don’t think the so-called “Patriot Act” was thought up AFTER 9/11, do you…?) Jews called “Zionists” were working well before ol’ Adolf arrived on the scene to try and populate their Homeland with displaced Jews. Their theme was to simply exaggerate gentile revulsion of their tribe with scenarios like the “Holocaust”. (The ’6 million’ dead Jew canard is a part of their scripture, which added weight to their desire to create Israel) These people are consummate propagandists, liars and control freaks. This candidate for the Supreme Court will be confirmed, and it’s because of ol’ Adolf that no one will be allowed to ‘emphasize’ her pedigree.
17 May, 2010 at 3:41 pm
“These people are consummate propagandists, liars and control freaks.”
How true! Those words should be chiseled on Mt. Rushmore.
And as for “ol’ Adolf’, I’ve always said (and I’ll say it again) that if there had never been a Hitler, the Jews would have to invent one.
They have manipulated and used his image very effectively to scare the wits out of people, to extort money, to suppress all opposition, and to silence any would-be critics with the accusation of “Nazi!”
17 May, 2010 at 4:00 pm
The Jews have distorted the real Hitler into something totally unrecognizable. They have turned a self-educated, self-made man who was polite around women, was a talented artist and a war hero who loved art, music, his mother, children and animals, into a cruel, shreiking, neurotic maniac who wanted to impose his insane ideas on the whole world. In other words, the Jews have succeeded in turning Hitler into one of them, ie, a JEW.
18 May, 2010 at 8:29 am
David, you are correct that the crushing defeat of National Socialist Germany was a boon to the jewish race. I know that there are some historians who claiim that jewish money financed the rise of Hitler. I don’t buy into that. Hitler really gave the jews a run for their money. After Stalingrad, when it was clear that Germany had no chance of winning the war, the jews began fabricate their “atrocity” tales, which the jew controlled media maximized to the hilt. The Nazis initially supported jewish immigration to Palestine. That was definitely a mistake. Madagascar would have been the best bet. There is no doubt that toward the end of the war, the big jews sacrificed a few of the little jews to gain world support for a jew homeland in Palestine, thus creating a cancer on the body of humanity that may destroy the world in the end.
18 May, 2010 at 10:01 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
0 
6
18 May, 2010 at 11:06 pm
David B., I am not a “White Supremacist”. I am not “supreme” in any sense. That’s how Jews think of themselves, so they project their arrogance on to us racially concious Whites. I am a White SEPARATIST. Let the Blacks return to Africa, the Orientals to Asia and the Jews to…Wait, exactly WHERE do the Jews come from, anyway?
No matter, after all the coloreds are sent back to where they belong, we will no longer enslave or exploit them, nor will we steal their natural resources, invade their countries, install puppet dictators or any of that shit. In return, they stay the fuck away from our shores, stop recieving any more foreign aid from us and leave our White women alone. That’s all I want!
19 May, 2010 at 1:09 am
Germany and England
by: Nesta Webster
Prefatory comments by Jackie P.
THIS is the little book that opened my eyes about the mass of massive lies we’ve all been told about Germany under National Socialism, and specifically it’s Chancellor, Adolf Hitler.
To my mind the greatest lie was that “Adolf Hitler planned to conquer the world and enslave the inhabitants of all nations”. In reality the ones making those accusations are the ones who plan to conquer the world. The defeat of Germany was a defeat for all the inhabitants of the world, just as Adolf Hitler predicted.
The group promulgating that big lie was successful in its efforts to instill a deep sense of both fear and hatred of the man who wanted only to restore some of the areas of land that had been sliced out of Germany by the Versailles Treaty after WWI, bring the German people back into the fold of their natural country borders, and protect western Europe from the Communist/Bolshevik tyranny threatening to wreak its havoc throughout the continent, and the world.
In another small book titled, The Nameless War, Captain A. H. M. Ramsay gives convincing evidence of the above statement. For some of our readers this will be a turning point (as it was for me). The more lies you uncover, the more truth you desire. Those of you who would rather remain blissfully ignorant will leave now. Those of you who know the truth and hate the truth will be frothing at the mouth that the lies are being exposed.
Captain Ramsay was a veteran of the first World War, a former member of His Majesty’s Guard, and — at the time of his arrest and imprisonment — a member of the British Parliament. He was arrested without formal charges and thrown into Brixton Prison for nearly three years because he discovered and attempted to reveal the culprits who were clamoring for, orchestrating and promulgating what became the Second World War.
Nobody wanted war in England or Germany except Winston Churchill and the War Hawks who controlled him and the press (just like in the U.S. of A. then and today). When Prime Minister Chamberlain returned from a trip to Germany where he had entered into one-on-one conversations with Chancellor Hitler, he announced to the Parliament and the British people that “there will be no war”.
Behind the exuberant celebrations of the people in both Germany and England, the planners went to work. Inside of one week, the controlled press was printing lies about the Prime Minister and began clamoring for his resignation. He was blamed for a military blunder that had actually been committed under Churchill’s orders as Admiral of the Navy. Instead of Churchill standing accused, it was Mr. Chamberlain.
Chamberlain was out; Churchill was in, and on the very evening of the day Churchill became Prime Minister (May 11, 1941), England began indiscriminate bombing of Germany. . . homes, churches, schools, hospitals, slaughtering defenseless men, women and children (just like the U.S. has done in Afghanistan, Iraq, and dozens of other nations).
The situation is the same now as it was then, and the same unseen hand at work today is the same force behind every revolution and war carried out since time immemorial. . . the English Revolution in the 1600′s (which resulted in the entrenchment of the Bank of England); the French Revolution, Russian Revolution (creation of the U.S.S.R), and the foiled (thanks to Mussolini and Hitler) Spanish revolution which Mrs. Webster relates in this book.
Germany and England was presented to me by a friend in her senior years, along with several boxes of books she had been accumulating over the past four decades. As I sat reading this book, in the privacy of my home, I was silently (and sometimes audibly) gasping in shock at the revelations herein.
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/germanyandengland/1.shtml
19 May, 2010 at 1:11 am
http://WWW.USSLIBERTY.ORG
19 May, 2010 at 9:15 am
David B., Thank you for revealing your true identity as an “anti-racist”. It makes your anti-Hitler ravings more understandable.
20 May, 2010 at 2:42 pm
Tim, you are well within your rights to practice “White Separatism”. You can choose to not associate with any ethnic group. However, you are playing into the hands of people who orchestrate these movements. They DESIRE ‘separatism’. If our nation’s diverse ethnic/political/sexual orientation/gender factions were to amalgamate, they would easily identify the TRUE RACISTS, and endeavor to expel them. This has happened throughout history. As long as we’re at each other’s throats, the Jews will continue to gain power over our divided nation.
20 May, 2010 at 3:10 pm
Let’s see, David Baker; if all White people will to almalgamate with niggers, spics, jews, queers, and feminists then we could easily identify the TRUE RACISTS and endeavor to expel them. I have heard all kinds of crazy explanations on the jewish question but yours really takes the cake.
20 May, 2010 at 3:49 pm
Jim, okay, please describe the “Southern Poverty Law Center”. What is their function? After that, please briefly name the progenitors of the feminist movement in the 60s. When that task is completed, you can research organizations like “ACT UP”, JINSA, the ADL, The U.S. Communist Party, AIPAC, and describe the ethnic/religious origins of the attorneys who sue everyone who stands in the way of these people. They’re all Jews, Jim. I think you’re laboring under the presumption that I am white, and simply opposed to their struggle. I am American Indian, and I am opposed to any action which diminishes our Constitution, our society, and our sovereignty.
20 May, 2010 at 4:23 pm
David, I am glad that you are proud that you are proud to be an American Indian. In the long wars fought on this contininent between your race and mine, there were atrocities commited on both sides. Your people fought bravely for your heritage just as our people fought bravely to a create a new European outpost in the vast Wilderness. Please tell me David; why are your people allowed, nay even encouraged to be proud of your heritage and we are not? All the organizations you mentioned are of course controlled by jews as is the entire ZOG infrastructure. Why would you criticize the jews? They are your allies; not ours.
20 May, 2010 at 7:48 pm
Jim, the Jew is not an “Ally” to any goy. The Jew is an entity of religious/ethnic dominance. A Jewish person may be your best friend, but not unless they will derive some benefit from that friendship. In truth, there are Jews who may not subscribe to the Talmudic principles, and will endeavor to assimilate into gentile societies. It is unfortunate that these people are derided more by their own race/religious order than they are by gentiles. In any case, we should realize in today’s world that Jews are dominating our media, our courts, our government, and every organization bent upon creating social unrest, and profligate litigation. Of these facts I am very sure.
You don’t believe in a multi-racial consensus about Jews, but you aren’t citing their history. Did you know that the Jews created laws in Russia that specify the DEATH PENALTY for so-called “Anti-Semitism”? You of course are aware of the prevailing oppression of the Russian justice system, are you not? Then why would the gentile Russians now risk the death penalty to openly and multi-racially call for the ouster of Jews? It doesn’t take a giant leap of faith to surmise that, once again, the “Chosen” have worn out their welcome, and even those sworn to protect them are joining the masses rallying against the Jew’s presence in yet another politically, fiscally and socially blighted nation. History can be a valuable tool to determine the most beneficial course for a people to take when faced with such circumstances. In the case of Jewish history, so far they’ve done their utmost to repeat it.
20 May, 2010 at 8:54 pm
David, everything that you said is very true. But you have not answered my question. The American Indians, negroes, mestizos, and every other GENTILE race except for the White race is allowed by our jewish overlords to be proud of their race and heritage. With all due respect for all the none-White races, I must say this; the jews realize that the RACIALLY AWARE pure blooded White man constitutes the only real threat to their power, hence their continual promotion of mixing the White race with the lower races.
20 May, 2010 at 11:38 pm
Jim, you fail to understand that the Jewish ‘acceptance’ of these races/cultures is not without conditions. Why they must be ‘approved’ for display of their pride is also indicative of how influential the media is in this realm. Personally, I’m not that hot on “Indian/Native American Pride”, mainly because they’ve adopted gambling as their source of support. The BIA looked after reservations, and insured those residents received services based upon treaties. Now, it’s more like the Mafia running the Tribal Councils. (Our tribe, California’s Coastal Miwok, has a joint venture with an established casino management organization linked to the Las Vegas underground. Their casino was built after the zoning laws were changed to ‘Trade’ land for the current site.) I see no problem with pride in one’s culture, race, or personal accomplishments. It’s not me who jumps like a scalded monkey when the dreaded “White Pride” mantra is spoken. What must be understood is that people shouldn’t feel superior to others just because of their racial makeup. We all breathe air, eat, and drink. Our God gave us everything we need to exist upon this rock. A human being is designed and built to take advantage of all these benefits. Why some people think they’re more worthy than others to receive these gifts, I’ll never know.
21 May, 2010 at 12:42 am
Will The Southern Poverty Law (And Investing) Center Return Its Madoff Money?
[See also: Good News: SPLC loses $50 Million. Bad news: $PLC can afford it, by Patrick Cleburne]
By Patrick Cleburne
The incredible Southern Poverty Law Center money machine just keeps rolling on and on, according to its latest Form 990 filing with the IRS [PDF] and its Financial Statement.
But the SPLC ($PLC to VDARE.COM) is rolling in an increasingly bizarre direction. For example: why exactly is it piling up its extraordinary, illiquid, secretive, never-touched money mountain? This kind of thing risks unfavorable IRS attention. And why does it need a bank account in the Cayman Islands?
Donations to the $PLC in the year ending October 31st 2009 were down 11.1%—to a mere $28.8 million. But, because of a massive $32.49 million (19.6%) increase in the value of its securities portfolio, the $PLC’s “Net Assets” rose to $199.95 million.
In contrast, according to one report, many charities faced contractions in funds available of 20-30% over this period.
Operationally, things weren’t too bad for the $PLC either. Despite fundraising expenses of $5.677 million, according to the 990, and despite supporting 206 employees (payroll $12.312 million), the $PLC still managed to transfer a remarkable $4 million (the same amount as last year) to its reserves—its so-called “Endowment Fund”.
In contrast, many, probably most, foundations must have had to invade their reserves in the arduous conditions of 2008-9.
With most charities, the term “Endowment Fund” would mean a pool of funds to which access is restricted, perhaps to income or a small percentage of assets.
This is not the case with the $PLC. Only a tiny proportion of its assets are restricted. The nomenclature is just camouflage. As Dan Borochoff, President of the watchdog American Institute of Philanthropies told Bill O’Reilly in 2001:
“It’s not really an endowment [just] because the board called it that.” [“The O’Reilly Factor,” interview with Daniel Borochoff, February 23, 2001.](See NPI/SPLC Report II, Pp17-18)
What this means: approximately 13.9 cents of every dollar that the public gave to the $PLC in 2008-9 was promptly squirreled away into a management-controlled hoard from which, on the available public record, it never emerges.
Difficult times did call for grave measures, however. The $PLC apparently did not feel able to accept VDARE.com’s helpful suggestion of last year that it make some donations (which it is quite entitled to do) to other leftist 501(c)(3) charities less wealthy than itself—many of whom were certainly suffering.
The $PLC also cut back its much-touted grants to school districts to encourage them to accept the egregiously-misnamed Teaching Tolerance anti-majority brainwashing kits by a striking 44.6%, to $108,144—a miniscule 0.3% of the Center’s receipts from the public in 2009.
And (in a step that no doubt grieved the hearts the senior management, given their actual priorities) the “unfunded commitments to invest…in limited partnerships and LLC’s under capital commitment agreements” referred to in Note 4 of both the 2008 and 2009 audited Financial Statements fell by 15%, to $7.056 million.
This brought this “unfunded capital commitments” down to 86.6% of 2009’s “Legal Services” expense from 103.8% in 2008.
What is this curious “unfunded capital commitments” item? It arises from the $PLC’s enthusiasm for putting its “Endowment Fund” booty in highly sophisticated investment pools, rather than just in simple equities, bonds, or (Heaven forbid!) deposit accounts. Generally, it is not uncommon for these investment pools, for instance in the venture capital or real estate fields, to get incoming investors to commit to a funding schedule as the underlying projects get under way.
What does this tell us about the $PLC?
It tells us that in the last two years the Center was budgeting to spend at least as much on arcane financial investments as it spent on its eponymous legal activity. Or, to put it another way, of every $1 received from the public in 2009, 28.3 cents was spent on legal services, while the “capital commitment” for limited partnerships and LLCs at the end of the year equaled 24.5 cents.
As I said last year, the $PLC is in effect a modest public interest law firm and fundraising operation, linked to a very large, wildly aggressive investment pool. It’s really the Southern Poverty Law and Investing Center!
One wonders if the $PLC’s apparently very credulous donors realize this.
Contemplating the “Endowment Fund” reveals a great deal about the motives and outlook of the $PLC’s management.
In brief, they appear obsessed with manipulating money to make money. This is particularly in view of recent changes evident in the 2009 reports. The structure of the portfolio looks like it could belong to a retired Goldman Sachs Partner, or possibly a very aggressive Family Office managing the fortune of an ultra-rich clan. There can be very few legal charities with this extraordinary appearance.
Usually one would expect that a charity with a large endowment would be interested in income, liquidity and perhaps a little growth—interest-bearing instruments, bonds, possibly a moderate amount of high grade equities.
Not the $PLC!
As of October 31st 2009, of the $PLC’s total investment portfolio of $197,902,331, only $48,772,162 (24.6%) was held in cash, interest bearing instruments, Treasuries or equities for which its accountants could establish “active market” values.
The balance (75.4%) was in various types of “alternative investments”, which needed less transparent valuation techniques. In 2008, only 49% of the portfolio was in such things.
What are these “alternative investments”? Note 4 in the Accounts says
“The Center’s endowment fund investments include limited partnerships, limited liability companies, and offshore corporations…The Center’s alternative investments themselves have interests in limited partnerships, U.S. and international public equities, private equity fixed income, real estate and commodities…Because alternative investments are not readily marketable, their estimated fair values are subject to judgment and uncertainty…”
On Wall Street, “alternative investments” got a bad name for illiquidity in the disruptions of 2008-9. The accounting profession developed a new way of valuing them.
The more transparent category (Level 2—”Inputs other than quoted prices…fair value is determined through the models or other valuation methodologies”) is used for $119.1 million of the total $PLC portfolio (60.1%).
Level 3 (“Inputs are unobservable…and include situations where there is little, if any market activity…investments included in Level 3 include…alternative investments which are not redeemable…in the near term.” is used for a material $30.08 million (15.2%) of the total portfolio.
Some might question the $PLC having such a large proportion of its reserves in illiquid (and presumably more risky) assets. It would certainly look odd for a normally-motivated charity.
But this would be to misunderstand what seems to be the purpose of these holdings in the $PLC’s case. There is no history and probably no intention of ever using these resources to sustain the Center’s operations. They are there to make the $PLC richer. In this context, a strategy of swinging for the fences makes sense.
Still, it has to be asked: why, in 2009, increase the proportion of “alternative investments” by half—to 78% in the case of the “Endowment Fund” narrowly defined? This was not a year in which this type of investment was favored. If more market gearing was desired, more speculative listed securities could easily have been used instead.
The VDARE.com hypothesis: privacy. As the $PLC increasingly moves into smearing other 501 (c) (3) charities such as the patriotic immigration reform groups, it can expect more attention to be paid to its peculiar finances. (For one thing, everyone is jealous!) By burying its holdings in these “alternative investment” entities, gains could be hidden for years, instead of immediately showing up in market valuations.
This is analogous to the Center’s real estate holdings: gross book value $25.3 million, $16.8 million after depreciation—but very likely worth far more than net book. (Real estate usually is.)
Increasingly, what the $PLC is really worth will be known only to insiders.
One matter for which VDARE.com does not have a hypothesis: the new disclosure, on Page 5 of the latest 990, that the $PLC now has an account in the notorious tax haven and money-laundering location of the Cayman Islands! (The previous year the answer to this question was “N/A.”)
Why would a tax-exempt American charity need any involvement in such a place? Appetite for exposure to a particular manager seems an implausible reason. Even quite small Hedge Fund and other “alternative investment” managers usually have look-alike onshore and offshore pools, the latter to accommodate investors who are able to avoid possible US tax involvement. But the $PLC is tax-exempt.
At the very least, the Cayman Islands account demonstrates the extraordinary scope of the $PLC’s investing activities.
The $PLC carries no less than 95.8% of its investment assets in its piously misnamed “Endowment Fund”. The American Institute of Philanthropies, which exists to rank the financial efficiency of charities, is quite reasonably very hostile to excessive accumulation of reserves. It said in the April/May edition of its Charity Rating Guide:
“AIP strongly believes that your dollars are most urgently needed by charities that do not have large reserves of available assets. AIP therefore reduces the grade of any group which has available assets equal to three to five years of operating expenses.”[VDARE.COM emphasis added]
The $PLC in 2009 had an investment portfolio equivalent to a thumping 6.6 years of what its 990 calls “Total functional expenses”. So it gets a resounding overall F grade from the AIP, in contrast to C- based on its operating ratios alone. This has been the case for quite some years.
The lowest grade ranked by the AIP as “Satisfactory” is C-. The only other politically-oriented charity to get an F based on excessive assets is President Carter’s Carter Center—which, however, was ranked A- on the basis of operations. (The only patriotic immigration charity to be ranked was FAIR, which got a B on operations—its endowment is apparently not large enough to matter.)
The $PLC cannot claim unstable inflows as the reason for its hoarding. In the last five years the “Gifts, grants, contributions…” has ranged between last year’s low of $28.8 million to the previous year’s high of $32.4 million.
The $PLC appears to have an odd compensation structure. In 2009, its 206 employees were paid an average of $59,765 (which is high: median household income in Montgomery, Alabama is about $42,000; the cost of living is 77.4% of the US average.) But only two of its officers were paid more than $300,000. Of the two SPLC enforcers with most public visibility, Mark Potok is only 7th in compensation at $144,099. Poor Heidi Beirich once again does not make the “Highest Compensated Employee” list.
Highest paid duo Richard Cohen (President/CEO: $345,490) and founder and evil genius Morris Dees (Chief Trial Counsel: $348,420) occupy an unusual shared compensation perch. If the two incomes are amalgamated to give the high pinnacle structure more normal in U.S. charities and corporations, the resultant $693,910 income would make its recipient 22nd highest paid Charity Executive, according to the AIP’s latest Charity Rating Guide—narrowly ahead of the ADL’s Abe Foxman at $688,215.
How active can Morris Dees be at 74? Enough to need an unspecified amount of Chartered Air transport, according to the 990, and to “accidently” spend $2,144 from a corporate credit card on personal travel.
When reviewing the $PLC’s accounts last year, I suggested it might have been expected that the moderate return/low risk strategy alleged by Ponzi scheme operator Bernard Madoff might have attracted their investments. This is especially so given the ethnicity of the $PLC’s funding, reported in a recent Center For Immigration Studies backgrounder to be
“anchored by wealthy Jewish contributors on the East and West coasts.”
Of course, it turned out the $PLC’s investment objectives were much too ambitious for it to be attracted by Madoff.
But there is a Madoff angle.
The Picower Foundation, set up by Jeffry Picower, is reliably reported to have been the biggest beneficiary of the Madoff scam [Picower’s Madoff Take Now Estimated to Be $7.2 Billion By Jake Bernstein Propublica, October 1, 2009] apparently gave the $PLC a total of $2.9 million. [De-funder of the Left, By Matthew Vadum, American Spectator, January 5, 2009].
Picower was found dead in his Palm Beach swimming pool last fall. His estate is reportedly about to settle with the court-appointed Madoff trustee by returning at least $2 billion. [Madoff fund to swell by $2bn, by James Quinn, Daily Telegraph (U.K.), May 4, 2010]
Helpful VDARE.com suggestion: Madoff left many destitute elderly in his wake. The $PLC should return its Picower money to the Madoff trustee for their benefit. After all, it’s conventional for politicians to return tainted campaign donations. (Suggest this to the Madoff trustee.)
So what is the $PLC’s mad scramble for enrichment all about?
Does the controlling clique at the Center one day intend to throw off its mask, perhaps after Dees’ death, let fundraising wither, and draw out massive salaries with minimal activity—a pattern not unknown in foundations with inherited endowments? (My personal guess.)
Or must America put continue up with its reckless and dishonest allegations stinking up our public discourse in order to keep the $PLC trough replenished?
Are these people as crazy as they are mendacious?
If you want to email or print out, format by clicking on this permanent URL:
http://www.vdare.com/cleburne/100520_southern_poverty_law.htm
21 May, 2010 at 1:51 am
I had a friend in the Army who was a Navajo or an Apache. John Standing Elk. Damn good man.
I think we should give a few parcels of land back to the Indians… The Dakotas, Nevada, half of Montana and Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, Nebraska, Kansas, Alaska, Hawaii…After all, they were here 20,000 years before the White man showed up. But it’s a myth that the Indians were in harmony with Nature and all that New Age crap. They killed off the prehistoric horses, camels, lions and mammoths that once roamed this continent.
21 May, 2010 at 8:37 am
David, you still have not answered my question.
22 May, 2010 at 5:22 am
Jim, the answer to your question is simple: Jews have whites in the palm of their hand, now that they are able to utilize their precious “Holocaust” to instill whites with guilt if they even mention Jewish power. White people have trouble remembering what happens when Jews start to dominate their media. They are not ‘allowed’ to repeat their actions with respect to Jewish populations spreading their brand of financial, liberal and counter-cultural agendas. Hence, the remedy to these problems becomes “Hate”. Each time the Jews have been kicked out of countries, they have virtually ruined their host nation’s economy. A Jewish writer explained this “Power of the Purse”. Jews have money–BIG money. They buy their safety with lickspittle, spineless goyim in their media who are trained to react predictably to any inference that Jews are power-hungry, and seek to dominate gentile populations. It is next to impossible for your white dissenters to gain audience in that media. If they do, they are instantly characterized as Nazis, Haters, paranoids, and other less-flattering labels. The only way to expose Jews for the shysters they are is to NOT react to them as a racist, but as a human being among fellow goyim who see the coming debacles. As I wrote in an earlier post, Russia is actively removing Jews, even though it is risking the Death Penalty to do so. In the U.S., it may come to the point where Jews are so entrenched, protected and lionized that no one, much less whites, will be able to reverse this trend. This Supreme Court nominee is just the beginning. To paraphrase the song “Old MacDonald”: “Here a Jew, there a Jew, everywhere a Jew Jew”.
22 May, 2010 at 8:31 am
David, I agree with you totally on every point except one: you say “The only way to expose Jews for the shysters they are is NOT to react to them as a racist, but as a human being among fellow goyim—”. What you as a non White does not understand is that Whites and ONLY Whites are targeted by the jews for EXTINCTION. Neither your American Indians or any other non White racial group is so targeted. We MUST act with defensive racism. The jews know very well that Whites are far more gullible than other races and show a propensity for fairness unknown to other races. While I highly respect you for your high degree of awareness of the jewish question, I must leave you with this thought: ITS A WHITE THING. YOU WOULDN’T UNDERSTAND IT.
25 May, 2010 at 3:45 pm
Jim, well, I understand what whites are going through, because I went throught it. (In fact, I’m still on the ADL’s ‘List’ of troublemakers.) The fact YOU are overlooking is that ALL GOYIM WILL SUFFER when the Jew gains ultimate power over us. It won’t matter if you’re black, asian, white, indian or latin. Do you believe for ONE MINUTE that the smirking Jew in those telecom commercials really enjoys the company of his basketball player companion? If you do, just Google information on the plight of those black Jews who were thrown out of Africa, and settled in Israel. You labor under the premise that Jews favor other ethnic groups, because they’re all “veectums” of whites. Don’t kid yourself, Jim. These people have no affinity for any other race. They might play the role of martyr for the oppressed classes, but that is their common ruse to both strengthen the role of government in social structuring, while increasing their own presence within government, legal and media circles as arbitrators between competing factions. I told you before, it was JEWS who started the feminist movement. It was JEWS who started the “Black Power” organizations. It’s JEWS who curry the favor (and votes…) of the illegal aliens. You are playing right into their hands with this “White Separatist/White Power” agenda. Believe me when I say we are all in the same boat (which will sink, just like the one in Russia..)
25 May, 2010 at 4:47 pm
You just don’t get it, do you?