27 June, 2010
Book Quote
Posted by Socrates in books, communism, judeo-communism, Marxism, quotations, quotations about jews, Socrates, Soviet Union at 12:42 am | 
Permanent Link
“From the 19th to the 24th of August, 1936, the first of the great trials begins in Moscow, passing judgment on the ‘Trotskyite-Zinovievist terrorist center.’ Zinoviev and Kamenev and other old-guard Bolsheviks are condemned to death and executed. Out of the 16 condemned to death, 12 are Jews.”
– from the book “The Jews in Russia” (New York; St. Martin’s Press, 1975) by Gerard Israel, page 165.
(This quote says a lot about Soviet communism and about who Stalin saw as his enemies).
27 June, 2010 at 1:08 am
Smash judeo-bolshevism!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15 
0
27 June, 2010 at 6:14 am
I wonder if the Fuhrer was aware of Stalin’s dislike of the Jews. Maybe if there was no Operation Barbarossa, Stalin’s anti-Jew purges would have continued?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
3
27 June, 2010 at 9:54 am
I think that Hitler must have been aware of Stalin’s awareness of the jewish control over the Soviet Union, Tim. If there had been no Operation Barbarossa and the non-aggression pact maintained, the war probably would not have morphed into a World War and some kind of accomodation could have been reached between the Reich and an de-jewified National Bolshevik Russia. Such are the ironies of Fate.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
1
27 June, 2010 at 9:58 am
Most Americans REFUSE to accept the FACTS that the Bolshevik revolution, and the establishment of Communism in Russia, was the work of JEWS. That is wny the evil Israeli Ashkenazi Khazars are supported by most in America. The truth does not matter in America today, which means that America is doomed!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
22 
0
27 June, 2010 at 10:10 am
In some ways Stalin can be regarded as a great hero. For example, he personally ensured the trial and execution of Marshal Tuchachevsky, an Imperial Guard officer who went over to the Bolsheviks. Many such elements, who had betrayed Old Russia, were one way or the other eliminated by Josef.
Hot debate. What do you think?
10 
11
27 June, 2010 at 1:21 pm
If Stalin was really a “great hero”, he would have made a real alliance with Hitler, kicked the kikes out of Russia, and turned Russia into a National Socialist State, instead of an International Bolshevik shit hole.
27 June, 2010 at 2:33 pm
Basically anyone who told Stalin what he didn’t want to hear or questioned his version of the “truth” was killed or put into the gulag.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14 
0
27 June, 2010 at 4:42 pm
According to the historian, John Toland, Stalin was so paranoid that he distrusted everyone around him and refused to believe almost everything he was told.
Toland said that the Nazi government was thoroughly riddled with spies and that Stalin was kept well aware of everything that Hitler was doing or planning — but he refused to believe it!
.
PS. I don’t understand what Ian means that Stalin “can be regarded as a great hero”. (???)
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
1
27 June, 2010 at 5:19 pm
I certainly do not view Stalin as anything good. He was married to three Jews. He spoke Yiddish at home. Stalin was responsible for the deaths of about 66 million in the Soviet Union. That is no “hero”. Whether or not he was a Jew continues to be debated.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15 
2
27 June, 2010 at 5:51 pm
I forget the exact details, which are vague in my mind, but weren’t even his children married to Jews?
You could hardly consider him an “anti-Semite”.
Maybe he just resented or distrusted a lot of Jews because a lot of Jews held positions of power, and he distrusted anyone with power.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
0
27 June, 2010 at 5:56 pm
I wonder about the accuracy of this book. Can any book written by a “Gerry Israel” be considered fully objective? Or is it just more lamenting about how persecuted they were?
Well, I don’t know. Just wondering.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
0
27 June, 2010 at 6:30 pm
I don’t know of any signs or indications that Stalin was Jewish. His parents were no well-to-do bankers, doctors, lawyers or merchants, like you’d expect to be the case in Jewish families. And he was studying to be an Orthodox priest, until he got dismissed for his political activities. I don’t know of any Jewish priests in the Eastern Orthodox Church. The Eastern Churchey is pretty strict about that sort of thing, I believe. However, Stalin’s family was not Georgian, they were probably Tatars.
Yes, Stalin’s first wife was a Jewess, but one night he got so fed up with her that he shot the bitch. One of Stalin’s sons was captured by the Wehrmacht, but Stalin refused to negotiate for his release, so the Germans supposedly shot the young man. There are also a few well-known quotes by Stalin regarding his irritation with the Jews.
I guess what I’m saying is that Stalin only did things that benefitted himself and his hold on power. It didn’t matter to him whether the Jews benefitted from his rule or not, as long as neither they nor anyone else tried to get in his way.
There were definitely some heroic aspects to Stalin and his life. But that doesn’t neccessarily mean he was a wonderful man or a superior leader.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
27 June, 2010 at 8:10 pm
Does anyone remember that old TV show ‘The Invaders’, that starred Roy Thinnes? I remember watching that show as a kid, and the Invader aliens in it – could assume an almost perfect image of a regular human, except their little pinky fingers weren’t able to bend properly. Anyway, the character played by Roy spent his time going around, looking for these aliens – and if he got a chance to put a bullet into one – they would kind of immediately catch on fire and just burn up in a puff of smoke.
I was wondering, if anyone knows whether or not Jews do this, on the extremely rare occasions where they have to fight their own wars and some Arab plugs one of them?
This question has really been bugging me lately, so I’d be thankful if anyone has the answer.
thanks
27 June, 2010 at 8:34 pm
Like you say, Luke, Jews are seldom ever seen fighting any of their own conflicts, they usually get us goyim to do their dirty work. And as I’ve said before, there are many Jew-made movies and TV shows that actually expose what the Jews are up to, it’s just that most Goyim mistake it all for entertainment and nothing more.
You know what I think would happen if you shot at a Jew? I think its humanoid shell would shred off like a potato skin and its slimy alien reptillian form would appear, shrieking and hissing.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
0
27 June, 2010 at 8:37 pm
“…….its humanoid shell would PEEL off like a potato skin….”
27 June, 2010 at 9:48 pm
Stalin was not in any true sense a hero. In spite of his awareness of jewish culpability, he displayed only token measures against jews in the bolshevik hierarchy. He never denounced the lies of Marxist-Leninism and had anyone who disagreed with him either “liquidated” or sent to Siberia. The true hero of that era was Adolf Hitler; a man who knew the truth and had the courage to act on it.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15 
0
27 June, 2010 at 10:26 pm
Stalin’s equivalent to a prime minister was a Jew. Stalin’s own daughter was married off to that Jewish prime minister’s son. The head of Stalin’s Gulag system was a Jew. There were Jewish commissars throughout the army, which Stalin kept there. There were Jews throughout the secret police, which Stalin kept there – anyone who is anti-Jewish would start by removing them from the secret police.
Stalin was surrounded by Jews – at the time of his death he had a Jewish doctor and his personal nurse was a Jewess, the doctor’s daughter.
Stalin simply removed anyone who had even a remote chance of being a threat to him. He delighted in torturing his victims psychologically for months, turning them against each other, informing on each other, pretending to be their friend and change the punishment, then kill them anyway. He was not just selfish, he was evil, taking pleasure in causing unnecessary pain and suffering for his victims. And he killed sixty million Whites, or more.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
0
27 June, 2010 at 11:04 pm
Stalin probably had all those Jews around him because he knew they were ruthless enough to keep everyone in line. Personally, he couldn’t stand them and had several hundred thousand Jews shot or shipped off to Siberia. BTW, some Soviet Jews were persecuted for their support of Zionism(!).
27 June, 2010 at 11:25 pm
“He delighted in torturing his victims psychologically for months, turning them against each other, informing on each other, pretending to be their friend, then kill them anyway.”– Nordlander
.
Thanks, Nordlander. Stalin must have been a terrible psychopath. An absolutely colossal psychopath, consumed with holding power and with suspicion of everyone around him!
I recently read an article (can’t remember where) which held that many corporate executive types, and expecially politicians, tend to be this personality type: self-seeking, ruthless people, greed-driven, conscience-less, amoral, indifferent to others, power thirsty, dedicated to their own self-aggrandizement at any cost. Stalin must have been this type to the nth degree.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
0
27 June, 2010 at 11:59 pm
I thought stalin (djugazvheli?) WAS a jew. By the way, the Goyfire 47 mp3 link doesn’t work, it just goes back to the main http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com page.
28 June, 2010 at 2:27 am
Nogkiller, Stalin was a lot of things (mass murderer, devious psychopath) but he wasn’t a Jew. Nowhere in any history I have read is he marked as a Jew, and I’m sure that the Georgians would not have accepted him as one of their own if he was a Jew. As it was mentioned by Tim above, Stalin was training to be a priest, but he failed at that and took up thievery and revolutionary activities.
Not that I am in any way defending Stalin… he was as evil and twisted as everyone says, but I HATE disinformation, and people in our movement are all too quick to label everyone a Jew at the drop of a hat.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
0
28 June, 2010 at 2:55 am
Very true. I was watching a show about Stalin on the “History” Channel last year, and they showed a doodle Stalin had made of one of his soon-to-be victims strung up BY HIS BALLS.
No doubt the “discovery” of Hitlah’s doodles depicting ass-twigged jewlets roasted over campfires like ‘Smores is imminent.
28 June, 2010 at 6:14 am
While World-Jewry appears generally as a powerful monolithic race, but close scrutiny reveals its weakness and a very fragile internal structure. Zionists and Anti-Zionist Jews fight each other, so do Ashkenazi vs. Sephardim, Liberals vs. Orthodox vs. Ultra-Orthodox, look at the many parties and factions fighting in the Knesset, the murder of Rabin and so on. Persecution and murder of Jews by Jews can hardly be misunderstanding or accident.
In this context people overlook that the mastermind of the Bolshevik revolution was Trotzky, not Lenin. This faction toppled the first revolutionaries around Jew Kerensky. Then Trotzky was in turn toppled, expelled and later murdered by the Stalin-Kaganovich gang. It also annihilated in bitter infighting another competing group led by Zienoview and Kamenev.
In the Purges Marshal Tuchachevsky was accused to be a “Trotzkiite”, possibly not without foundation. Which would again point IMO to a typical war between secret gangs and their leaders jockeying for power.
That Jews are divided into many factions and form secret criminal gangs for gain and power has never been a secret. Even the “Cold War”, Korean war, etc. could be explained this way, as well as the rumor, that Stalin himself was eventually murdered in 1953.
There is no doubt, that Jewish infighting continues to this day. As in any real gangland war, the bullets are flying in all directions, hitting targets as often as not.
We outsiders are confused by the events and the writings of Jews attempting to explain away the events and facts, so we can only guess where they have been coming from.
Only Anti-Semitism holds Jews somehow together. As history indicates, this seems to have been always the case.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
28 June, 2010 at 8:06 am
As Colonel Rockwell wrote, you don’t have to go very far to find a depiction of jews atrocities, it’s in just about every home in Americkwa, every courthouse has one, politicians and even dawgcatchers have to take an oath on it.. Read the bible.
The strange thing about the Kwa is not that the jews haven’t beem poisecuted here, but that they haven’t really been as active as in the ole soviet jewnion in mass murdering goys.
But let there be a movement toward secession that has a gnats ass chance of success and will see the jew killing machine go into
action much to the delight of the patriotard community.
28 June, 2010 at 8:13 am
As evil as Stalin was, Roosevelt and Churchill were probably responsible for more Aryan loss of life during the Second World War. After Hitler invaded the Soviet Union, FDR sent Stalin billions of dollars worth of military hardware, thus prolonging a conflict on the Eastern Front that normally would have lasted a few months at the most, and would have resulted in the end of jewish bolshevism forever.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
1
28 June, 2010 at 8:15 am
What amazes me alot more than what Stalin or the jew bolsheviks did, but what the Tsars own relatives didn’t do. He was a cousin to Englands ruling family, the Tsarina was a grand daughter of queen Victoria, the Tsars grandmother was the Danish Queen, and they just let the jews murder them.
28 June, 2010 at 9:01 am
While World-Jewry appears generally as a powerful monolithic race, but close scrutiny reveals its weakness and a very fragile internal structure. Zionists and Anti-Zionist Jews fight each other,
Zionism was banned in the early Soviet Union, yes. This was because it was an organized movement that would possibly make Jews emigrate to Palestine. The communists wanted the Jews to stay in Russia and help control the goyim.
It was a brotherly competition, though. “We think this is the best way.” “No, I think this is the best.” Like two mechanics arguing on how to fix an engine. The underlying assumption is the same, that Jews must rule.
Jews, like all non-Whites – indeed, all people – have rivalries and infighting. To understand them we might look at the early European empires. They competed and fought each other, but they agreed that it should be Europeans who ruled the world. That didn’t even need to be stated.
Or look at the Mafia at its height. There were rivalries, but they were still in the same community. They agreed that there should be a Mafia running things.
Or look even closer, to White Nationalism. There is infighting. But to outsiders, a WN government would look pretty much the same no matter who led it; the end of Jewish control, an end to thousands of anti-White programs, an end to support for Israel, a huge change in foreign policy, a crushing down on crime, anti-miscegenation laws, massive new information in the media, a cleaning up of universities, tens of millions of Latinos marched southward. To a shocked liberal cameraman documenting that brown wave moving south across the border, it must seem pretty insignificant which faction of White Nationalists is at the helm.
(The difference between WNs and JNs is of course that the JNs compromise almost their entire race.)
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
28 June, 2010 at 9:53 am
tens of millions of Latinos marched southward. To a shocked liberal cameraman documenting that brown wave moving south across the border.
Yeah, the liberals will have a hard time holding the tears in check
and seeing the silvery lining. NAW THEY NEED TO ACCOMPANYTHE LATRINO FLOCK
28 June, 2010 at 12:08 pm
Blackshirt Says:
” Stalin was a lot of things (mass murderer, devious psychopath) but he wasn’t a Jew. Nowhere in any history I have read is he marked as a Jew, and I’m sure that the Georgians would not have accepted him as one of their own if he was a Jew. As it was mentioned by Tim above, Stalin was training to be a priest…”
I’m not knowledgeable enough to take a position on this, so I don’t claim to know. And I’m not one of those who are quick to jump to suspicions. But I can at least say that I have read claims that he was a Jew. By descent, that is. I imagine that all the Christian sects would be thrilled to get a convert — a Jew who “saw the light” — and would not reject one. (In old Lithuania, for instance, a Jew who converted was automatically elevated to the nobility. And in Poland, Jewish converts were adopted by the nobility.) [for documentation, see Wikipedia]
However, there is so much misinformation out there (and exactly the same thing with Herr H.) that one really doesn’t know what to believe. So we have to treat it all with care and some suspicion. But we can’t reject it entirely. Therefore, I consider it up in the air. Who will ever really know?
Somewhere I read that Djugashvili (spelling?) means son of the Jew, or “Jewsson”. Of course, I don’t know a thing about Georgian, so I have no opinion on that either. Take it for what it’s worth. My only point is that such allegations have been made.
28 June, 2010 at 12:30 pm
I have a comment here, regarding the Czar, that absolutely REFUSES to go through. After three tries — well spaced apart — it STILL won’t go! I thought some French words in it might be the problem (something with a filter) so I took them out. But it still does not go!!! There’s something about it that the machine doesn’t like.
It’s odd that the last post went thru, without any problem, but this one simply won’t.
I’ll try again in another hour or two.
28 June, 2010 at 2:16 pm
I recently read this somewhere: It was a conversation between Stalin and his mother that supposedly took place around 1925-27, when Stalin was becoming the most powerful figure in post-Lenin Soviet Russia:
“Stalin’s mother: “So, my son, what shall we call you now?”
Stalin: “Mama, you remember the Czar?”
“Yes, of course I do.”
“Well, I’m sort of like the new Czar.”
I just wanted to remind everyone that even Stalin had a mother. Lenin too. In fact, Lenin wanted to be buried next to his mother, not in some mausoleum where he would be on display. Historical characters should be loooked at as complex individuals, not as cartoonish villians or heroes.
28 June, 2010 at 2:41 pm
Nom de Guerre Says:
“What amazes me …was what the Tsars own relatives didn’t do. He was a cousin to Englands ruling family, the Tsarina was a grand daughter of queen Victoria, the Tsars grandmother was the Danish Queen, and they just let the jews murder them.”
That was just after a terrible world war that had bled Europe dry and left it exhausted and gasping. They couldn’t afford to do anything. I have read that the royal family in Denmark were literally trembling on their throne for fear of the socialists who seemed about to do the same thing as in Russia. They were all terrified of Bolshevism. Even in England. At that point, royalty had all they could do to save their own necks.
Remember that the last time this happened — just over a century earlier, when the French guillotined their king — all the powers of Europe united to “punish” the French for daring to execute a monarch. That just simply wasn’t done! It couldn’t be tolerated. The result was that the revolution exploded out of France and overwhelmed all of Europe. It produced a Napoleon who conquered the entire continent and replaced those “divine right” monarchs on their shaky thrones with his own relatives. That was lesson enough! From then on, each royal family had to look out for itself.
It was “Sauve qui peut”, as the French say in time of shipwreck or catastrophe (Save yourself!)
28 June, 2010 at 2:43 pm
14:42 Tried again.
Czar post would not go through!
28 June, 2010 at 2:45 pm
Nom de Guerre Says:
“What amazes me …was what the Tsars own relatives didn’t do. He was a cousin to Englands ruling family, the Tsarina was a grand daughter of queen Victoria, the Tsars grandmother was the Danish Queen, and they just let the jews murder them.”
That was just after a terrible war that had bled Europe dry and left it exhausted and gasping. They couldn’t afford to do anything. I have read that the royal family in Denmark were literally trembling on their throne for fear of the socialists who seemed about to do the same thing as in Russia. They were all terrified of Bolshevism. Even in England. At that point, royalty had all they could do to save their own necks.
28 June, 2010 at 2:48 pm
re. Nom deGuerre:
Remember that the last time this happened — just over a century earlier, when the French guillotined their king — all the powers of Europe united to “punish” the French for daring to execute a monarch. That just simply wasn’t done! It couldn’t be tolerated. The result was that the revolution exploded out of France and overwhelmed all of Europe. It produced a Napoleon who conquered the entire continent and replaced those “divine right” monarchs on their shaky thrones with his own relatives. That was lesson enough! From then on, each royal family had to look out for itself.
It was “Sauve qui peut”, as the French say in time of shipwreck or catastrophe (Save yourself!)
28 June, 2010 at 2:49 pm
It wasnt that Stalin,(who accd. to Jewish sources,was a Jew)had it out for the Chosen.It was simply that Jews comprised the overwhelming majority of the senior officials in the Soviet govt.,admin,secret police,etc.As such,he deemed them a threat to his power and eliminated many.
28 June, 2010 at 2:50 pm
Well, that was the LAST part of the post. It made it.
The FIRST half still REFUSES to go through the filter!
Will try again, separately.
28 June, 2010 at 2:51 pm
re. Nom de Guerre:
That was just after a terrible world war that had bled Europe dry and left it exhausted and gasping. They couldn’t afford to do anything. I have read that the royal family in Denmark were literally trembling on their throne for fear of the socialists who seemed about to do the same thing as in Russia. They were all living in terror of Bolshevism. Even in England. At that point, royalty had all they could do to save their own necks.
28 June, 2010 at 2:55 pm
Nope! The first part absolutely WILL NOT GO!
I’ve been trying since this morning, giving it lots of time in between.
Apparently, it won’t accept the name of certain historical figures (??) I wish I knew what.
This is weird.
28 June, 2010 at 7:06 pm
Yeah it simply wasn’t done, but then those Puritanical English
lobed off the head of King Charles the First, nearly a century
earlier, and Elizabeth, the virgin Queen put to death her
cousin Mary of Scotland, and how many Queens did Henry VIII
lower the shoulders of. So I guess you’re right Henry, there
is no loyalty among(st) royalty
28 June, 2010 at 8:17 pm
Yeah it simply wasn’t done — there
is no loyalty among(st) royalty
–Nom de Guerre
So true! They never hesitated to knock off each other when it was necessary. That was their perogative. But they didn’t like uppity commoners doing it.
As for those examples above, only Charles was killed by commoners, but Europe had been ravaged by with the 30Years War at the time and was preoccupied. Henry and Elizabeth were royalty who killed OTHER royalty, so that was a little different, I guess. Even so, the courts of Europe were shocked – it hadn’t been done before, but England was hard to get to, much harder than France. Still, Philip of Spain tried to invade …largely as a result of Mary of Scotland’s death… (she was also a relative), but the Armada failed.
[Phillip had been Elizabeth's brother-in-law, btw, and he almost married Elizabeth, but became convinced much later that she was a witch, as she bested him at every turn.]
My first part, very basically, said that the court of Denmark was terrified of the socialists and feared that the same thing was going to happen to them. And the other courts of Europe lived in terror of the Bolsheviks as well. The English throne too. So they were all concerned with saving their own necks. They couldn’t help the Romanovs.
28 June, 2010 at 8:21 pm
No Loyalty among Royalty.
So true! They never hesitated to knock off each other when it was necessary. That was their own perogative. But they didn’t like uppity commoners attempting it. The peasants might get ideas.
As for those examples above, only Charles was killed by commoners, but Europe had been ravaged by with the 30Years War at the time and was preoccupied. Henry and Elizabeth were royalty who killed OTHER royalty, so that was a little different, I guess. Even so, the courts of Europe were shocked – it hadn’t been done before, but England was hard to get to, much harder than France. Still, Philip of Spain tried to invade …largely as a result of Mary of Scotland’s death… (she was also a relative), but the Armada failed.
[Phillip had been Elizabeth's brother-in-law, btw, and he almost married Elizabeth, but became convinced much later that she was a witch, as she bested him at every turn.]
My first part, very basically, said that the court of Denmark was terrified of the socialists and feared that the same thing was going to happen to them. And the other courts of Europe lived in terror of the Bolsheviks as well. The English throne too. So they were all concerned with saving their own necks. They couldn’t help the Romanovs.
28 June, 2010 at 8:25 pm
Nom de Guerre:
“No Loyalty among Royalty”
So True. They could do it to each other, but they didn’t like uppity peasants trying it.
I wrote you another post on this, and tried TWICE, but IT WOULD NOT GO THROUGH!!!
I give up.
28 June, 2010 at 9:04 pm
Henry, the spam filter is a real bitch. I’ve had the problems you are describing in the past. The only thing to do is to not post for a day or two and then you may be seen as clean by the system. I find that if I have a post rejected and I continue to try and post on that subject, the filter just automatically rejects all my posts made shortly thereafter. There seems to be no rhyme or reason to how the filter decides what to let through or not. I have found one pattern though- I tend to get more lost posts when I include a one sentence paragraph, which is a habit I have if I want to call attention to one important statement.
29 June, 2010 at 6:44 am
The Cromwellian execution of King Charles in the 1600s, was taken less seriously by European Powers than the guillotining of the King Louis in the 1700s. The Great Powers were then Catholic, based in Vienna, Madrid, Rome and latterly Paris. The English Parliament executing the King Of England was, to an extent, seen as the antics of bizarre hillbillies.
29 June, 2010 at 8:40 am
Look at the apathetic populace of Demonacracies, We endure
as the protocols of Zion said, a thousand more train of abuses
from leaders, that would have cost a king is head.
29 June, 2010 at 9:38 am
That’s a good point, Ian. The execution of Charles I didn’t create any shock-waves around the world, but the executions of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette did. I guess the French Revolution was seen as being a lot more radical and dangerous to other monarchies than the English Civil War was.
29 June, 2010 at 11:20 am
The only public execution of fallen leaders I’ve ever witnessed, was Sadaam Husseins hanging, and the execution of Romanian strong man Nicolai Ceausescu. Both paragons of virtue compared to the rotten corpses we have sitting in our politburos.
Gore Vidal wrote that after seeing his grandfathers car stoned by the rioting veterans in the 30′s. that ever since that time he knew that what couldn’t happen here, will happen here.
29 June, 2010 at 11:23 am
Viva la revolucion Blanco!
29 June, 2010 at 11:29 am
Fuck the ole rotten turd Byrd, and Fat Face Teddy,
Up slick Willies ass with a sharpened stave
Down Dubbyas throat with a bucket of
melted lead.
Dig up Rotten Ronnie Reagan and drag him down the LA freeway at
at rush hour like the returning Royalists did to that rotten Oliver Cromwell
2 July, 2010 at 8:44 am
Look at the apathetic populace of Demonacracies, We endure
as the protocols of Zion said, a thousand more train of abuses
from leaders, that would have cost a king is head.