29 June, 2010
Nice, Polite, Fair-Minded Conservatives Always Fumble the Football Before They Reach the End-Zone
Posted by Socrates in conservatism, conservatives, constitution, guns & goy controllers, guns and gun issues, Socrates at 5:25 pm | 
Permanent Link
It’s almost like conservatives are afraid to win. Here was a golden chance to spell out exactly what the Second Amendment really means, in home, car, boat, etc., after decades of legal ambiguity. But no. And by saying that state/local governments can place “reasonable” restrictions on guns (what does that mean?), the conservatives on the court have guaranteed that gun lawsuits (both pro and anti) will clog courts for the next 40 years:
30 June, 2010 at 12:01 am
Conservatives can never win because they want to bring back the past rather than forge ahead into a new future. With the Fourth of Jew-Lie approaching, let us never forget that The Jewnighted States of Amerikwa was an entity that from the very beginning was used as an instrument of the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy to emasculate, and ultimately destroy the power of the White race. Such idiotic statements in the Declaration such as “All men are created equal” (although never intended in a biological sense, of course), and such ignoble ideals such as “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, instead of Aryan ideals such as heroism and sacrifice for the racially homogeneous folk community formed the nucleus of a system that led to the mess that we find ourselves in today. The so-called American “Revolution” of 1776 was, in fact a jewish revolution, as was the Franch Revolution, and the Bolshevik Revolution. The only real Revolution that ever benefitted the White Race was the German Revolution of 1933, that, if it had not been crushed by the combined forces of jewish “democracy” would have secured the ascendency and dominion of the White Race on this Earth forever.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14 
4
30 June, 2010 at 12:23 am
Objectively, what the Founders meant was that Americans may keep and bear the implements necessary to overthrow the existing and contemporary government. The Second Amendment uses the word arms and simply clarifies what was understood contemporarily, that EVERY MAN, including the Minutemen, had guns at the ready, in their homes. It actually refers to the implements necessary to overthrow the government. In this day and age, that would mean, in addition to small arms, mini-guns, LAWs, Howitzers, missiles, chemical and nuclear weapons. Is it possible to plan and execute the overthrow of any modern government with muskets and long rifles? I am very sorry, but if one is to strictly interpret, or rather, read, the Second Amendment, not only does it apply to ALL small arms, but the entire spectrum of military weaponry which would be required to form an effective “militia” in 2010 A.D. Americans may keep and bear arms. Meaning ALL ARMS. PERIOD. The post WWII “arms race” was primarily focused on nuclear weapons…the Second Amendment states that Americans may keep and bear “arms” without restriction and understanding that the intent was to be effective in opposing an oppressive and tyrannical government.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
2
30 June, 2010 at 12:48 am
The Second Amendment is so badly worded that you can tell it was written by lawyers. In addtion to being traitors to the Crown, the Founding Fathers were a bunch of Jew-friendly millionaire lawyers, bankers, businessmen and landowners, people I have no respect or admiration for. They had the chance to give us a truly revolutionary White Republic but decided on just another Plutocracy instead.
At any rate, White Americans, not the courts or the cops or city hall, should decide how well-armed they want to be. The government should fear and respect us, not the other way around, dammit.
Hot debate. What do you think?
8 
11
30 June, 2010 at 1:46 am
Dr. Pierce wrote an excellent pamphlet years ago called “Why conservatives can’t win”. It is a concise argument against the conservative strategy and I encourage every WN to read it.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
1
30 June, 2010 at 1:51 am
Constitution… Second Amendment… Bla bla bla… Wrong argument. We need a new Hitler, not appeals to the “Constitution”.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
3
30 June, 2010 at 1:52 am
You know the difference between the Constitutionalist and the conservative is slight. Both don’t want to overstep the boundaries of polite discourse.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
0
30 June, 2010 at 1:56 am
They don’t want to look at things realistically, in brutally honest terms.
“Conservatives can never win because they want to bring back the past rather than forge ahead into a new future. With the Fourth of Jew-Lie approaching, let us never forget that The Jewnighted States of Amerikwa was an entity that from the very beginning was used as an instrument of the Judeo-Masonic conspiracy to emasculate, and ultimately destroy the power of the White race. Such idiotic statements in the Declaration such as “All men are created equal” (although never intended in a biological sense, of course), and such ignoble ideals such as “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, instead of Aryan ideals such as heroism and sacrifice for the racially homogeneous folk community formed the nucleus of a system that led to the mess that we find ourselves in today. The so-called American “Revolution” of 1776 was, in fact a jewish revolution, as was the Franch Revolution, and the Bolshevik Revolution. The only real Revolution that ever benefitted the White Race was the German Revolution of 1933, that, if it had not been crushed by the combined forces of jewish “democracy” would have secured the ascendency and dominion of the White Race on this Earth forever.”
Wonderful.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
1
30 June, 2010 at 8:04 am
Right on Jim, the old fogeys of foggie bottom and every other bottomless pit in every one of the 50 mini-plutocracies know as states are no more than rubber stamps for jewdeo-masonic evisceration of the White race.The kwanservatives are just the other fat kid on the kosher teeter totter.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
1
30 June, 2010 at 8:15 am
Patrick Henry called the “Kahn”Stitution a pact with the devil(Jews), ,and Ben Franklin gave them all the details of what was gonna happen by letting in the Jews. Whoa there Ben!Weren’t you a about 100 years too late? The damn jews had been running the nigger slave trade since at least a century earlier.
Well, well what are the jews up too now? They just aired a PBS special about Andy Jackson, whom the jews dearly hate, but they flip flop over and hold Andy up as an icon for perpetual Union, where States have no right to secede, just like the jews religion that say they are gonna rule the world, and you can’t get out of it come hell or high water.
30 June, 2010 at 8:16 am
Even if the Second Ammendment does state that Americans can bear “arms”, a lot of good it has done us in preventing the government from becoming more and more opressive. As Dr. Pierce said, the REAL control of the government lies in the power of those who control the MEDIA. And who controls the media in all Western “democratic “societies????? Duhhhhh.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
0
30 June, 2010 at 8:35 am
From cradle to grave the masses of asses are sitting in front of the jew tube… Why the media “personalities” mostly women or minorities keep you informed, tell you to put on your coat when you go outside, just like Mister Rogers.
They are really getting more adamant that you focus all your attention on the televitz, the other night one of the females when reporting a store about a missing elderly Spic, barked out “Come to your TV set and take a good look”
30 June, 2010 at 9:20 am
It actually refers to the implements necessary to overthrow the government. In this day and age, that would mean, in addition to small arms, mini-guns, LAWs, Howitzers, missiles, chemical and nuclear weapons. Is it possible to plan and execute the overthrow of any modern government with muskets and long rifles?
Carrol Quigley, professor at Georgetown, and mentor of Slickster willy, wrote a large Tome “Tragedy and Hope.” In that book he
point out the limitations that tyrannies have when the arms they bear are of no superiority over others. That all changed with the Industrial revolution somewhere in the late 1800′s, gave rise to standing professional armies, endless wars etc.
30 June, 2010 at 9:25 am
Notice how Zog has to placate all the Minority militias, who are better equiped than most state and local police forces. We’ve got no go zones for White policemen in most major Amerikwan cities, and even then the Mexishits aren’t deterred … You get assaulted every time you travel down the street, by earth quake blasting audio. Tell me that isn’t a weapon.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
30 June, 2010 at 9:28 am
What sort of rights do we have? No rights at all. Even the Communist Chinese workers have more rights than we do, and they excercise them, like when they tried to bring in some Uigher labourers into a Han Chinese factory, the Hans literally squashed them to death.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
30 June, 2010 at 9:54 am
I like and own guns, but I really doubt that most of these second amendment yahoos have the guts to use the guns they advocate so much to own. When it comes down to it most of these guys will do whatever the government tells them to, because at heart they are pussies and they worship authority.
As long as there is a Repubicunt in office, they are placated. Look at what happened during the 8 years we had Bush- hardly a word about the non-white invasion. Bush and his rich buddies wanted and kept the turd world invasion going full-throttle, but the kahnservatives were more concerned about keeping the ten commandments in a courthouse or getting prayer back into schools. It really burns my ass to see all of these “patriots” come out of the woodwork now we have a coon Democrat in office… where were these hypocrites during the years Bush was being a puppet of the Jews and corporations? I swear I hate these Conservatives worse than I do liberals, they are goddamned cowards.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
1
30 June, 2010 at 10:08 am
As long as there is a Repubicunt in office, they are placated. Look at what happened during the 8 years we had Bush- hardly a word about the non-white invasion. Bush and his rich buddies wanted and kept the turd world invasion going full-throttle,
Yea, the great White dopes like cocaine snortin’ dubbya, Darth vader Cheney, and left over remnants from Pharaohs tomb , are the darlings over Kwanservatives.
30 June, 2010 at 10:29 am
I agree with you, Blackshirt (even though some people seem to get annoyed when I write that). Where were all those Tea Baggers when GW Bush was in power? The muds were swarming in here back then just as much as they are now, if not more so. The size, spending and power of the Federal Government under Bush all increased dramatically, but not a peep of protest from the good ol’ boys. Only a few brave souls like Medea Benjamin of Code Pink and Cindy Sheehan had the guts to publicly stand up to the Bush Regime. The flag-wavin’, ass-scratchin’, Dixie Chicks hatin’ Republitards were as happy as proverbial pigs in shit back then, even though nothing has really changed, except for the worse.
Hot debate. What do you think?
5 
8
30 June, 2010 at 10:31 am
I’ve always wondered why they always had a cameraman on hand to film the exploits of Bush 1, taking a dive off an aircraft carrier, and ditching it and swimming back to an awaiting life boat. All the ole boyz down at the lodge or the VFW shout amen.
30 June, 2010 at 12:48 pm
Simultaneously, they say “Constitutionalists” and Americans who think the old ways were the correct ways are LIVING IN THE PAST. Their “Bible” is 3,000 years old and they and their Christian kapos say we should strictly adhere to those Jewish teachings and zealously live in the Jewish past!
30 June, 2010 at 12:57 pm
The Bush family participates in the Mexican invasion of America. Jeb, the son, married a Mexican. Jeb happily presided over the furtherance of the Cuban/Mexican invasion of Florida. The Bush’s love that “brown blood running in the family’s veins.” Treachery and back-stabbing are in the European DNA. Didn’t brothers fight each other in the Civil War? Jews stick together. Jews understand the concept of divide and conquer. Only 10 Million Jews in the entire world and they run the Fed, World Bank, IMF; in fact, they run the entire world.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
30 June, 2010 at 1:39 pm
“Only 10 Million Jews in the entire world and they run the Fed, World Bank, IMF; in fact, they run the entire world.”
Only because we allow them to, son.
Hot debate. What do you think?
6 
10
30 June, 2010 at 1:46 pm
What a bunch of whiners.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
5
30 June, 2010 at 3:35 pm
Hey Old Dutch, what role do the Catholics play in all this? Tell us about those damn greasers, guidos, and micks, why don’t ya’?
30 June, 2010 at 4:22 pm
Right Blackie, the Roman Catholics on the Supreme Court are all mouth. Why call them Conservatives—call them what they are Roman Catholics. LOL.
John Boehner, just like your aunt Nancy Peolsi, are both just Roman Catholics in the final analysis.
Btw, Boehner is kind of greasy for a German Roman Catholic. I think he has more than too much time in a tanning salon.
Hot debate. What do you think?
5 
3
30 June, 2010 at 5:21 pm
Old Douche, I agree with you that Roman Catholics are a bigger problem than Jews! Especially those dirty Italians and those stupid Irish, puppets of the pro-Jew pope in Rome! Old Dutch, you are so right, when are we going to put more focus on Catholics? We spend too much time on Jews when Catholics are the real enemy. Thanks, OD!
Hot debate. What do you think?
4 
4
30 June, 2010 at 6:42 pm
Conservatives, especially, neocons are the most cowardly, disgusting pieces of shit that ever walked the earth. Pecker heads like Rush Limpdick and Sean Hannjobity are far more dangerous to the White race than the stupidest of the liberals and leftists. At least some of the leftists are critical of Zionism and are not afraid to tell the truth about 9-11. Conservatives, on the other hand bend over backwards to placate the kikes and would never dream of criticizing any aspect of the jew’s ongoing anti-White agenda. A few paleocons like the late Sam Francis knew the score about race, but would never go out on a limb to name the jews.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
30 June, 2010 at 8:06 pm
Fuck the Constitution. Fuck the Declaration of Independence. Down with the zionist occupied jew government. Up with the White Aryan People’s Republic. RAHOWA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hot debate. What do you think?
8 
4
30 June, 2010 at 8:15 pm
Our #1 enemy is conservatives.
Why?
Because they are liberals wrapped in American flags, to fool you and screw you.
They are EVEN JEWIER than liberals, on the whole. They worship Israel and “boil the frog”. No patriotard pays attention when a Republican is in office!
They are the most insidious enemy. Actually, if you think about it, they are what the kike book calls Judas goats. Pied pipers, leading this childish nation to destruction while singing sweet songs.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15 
1
30 June, 2010 at 8:19 pm
Hey, Blackie did your aunt Nancy Pelosi get you that job at the agency? Or was it her Roman Catholic pal John Boehner that did Pelosi a favor? The job that enables you to monitor VNN? One Roman Catholic hand washing the other. LOL.
Btw, the Roman Catholic leader of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Pat Leahy says that the radical Jewess Kagan will be nominated and approved by the Senate. That’s the offical Roman Catholic stamp of approval of the Jewess Kagan!
http://www.salon.com/news/elena_kagan/?story=/news/feature/2010/06/30/leahy_predicts_kagan_approval
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
5
30 June, 2010 at 8:25 pm
Btw, Protestant Jeff Sessions is the only US Senator to ask the radical Jewess Kagan (Kaganovitch?) any really tough questions.
All of the Roman Catholics kissed Kagan’s fat Jew ass in public. LOL.
Hot debate. What do you think?
6 
5
30 June, 2010 at 8:48 pm
Old Douche says:
Yeah douche, those Protestant Republicans are doing everything they can to stop the Jewish power in this country! You know what, I think we should all go and support the Republican party now, since they obviously are the party of our greatest allies, the Protestants!
Down with the Pope- the tool of the Jews! Old Douche you are so right!
30 June, 2010 at 10:06 pm
Pray your Holy Catholic Mary’s Blackie, it looks like your Roman Catholic co-religionists in the US Senate will support Kagan across party lines. Which is what they do in almost all issues involving Jews, or the Jew homeland.
Hot debate. What do you think?
5 
6
30 June, 2010 at 10:56 pm
Oh, boy! Look at all this merry mud slinging amongst this cheery crowd. And people accuse me of stirring up trouble, when all I do is criticise it!!! They dont like that.
Well, some of them dont. A couple.
People here (I mean the “kids”) really enjoy having a good mud fight! Thats all they do 3/4 of the time. Insult. Insult. Tear down, tear down.
Well, one must admit its certainly a good way to distract attention from the real issues and keep people disunited and preoccupied with squabbling with each other. Otherwise, they might start getting united. Cant have THAT!!!
Sigh!
But then, maybe Old D. does have a valid point about some people having a job at The Agency that enables them to monitor VNN 24/7. Who else would have the time?
Hot debate. What do you think?
10 
7
30 June, 2010 at 11:02 pm
old dutch Says: “What a bunch of whiners.”
Too bad we don’t have a bunch of winners!
Its a pity, that it is.
Hot debate. What do you think?
11 
7
1 July, 2010 at 1:50 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
3 
9
1 July, 2010 at 4:27 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
4 
10
1 July, 2010 at 8:54 am
Right on Tim, ALL denominations of christianity, both Catholic and Protestant are the deadly enemes of our Race. Even Southern Baptist preachers like zionist stooge Billy Graham now advocate Whites interbreeding with niggers; an idea that would have been unthinkable fifty years ago. So called “Identity Christianity” is no solution either. We need to dump all middle eastern monotheistic superstitions, return to our Pagan roots, and adopt a new religious philosophy in harmony with Race and Nature.
Hot debate. What do you think?
5 
3
1 July, 2010 at 10:40 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
1 
6
1 July, 2010 at 11:07 am
I don’t claim to be a pagan, if anything I’m agnostic.
But OD knows that, he just plain hates Catholics. That would be fine if he hated all the other forms of Christinsanity, but for some INSANE reason he thinks that being a Protestant makes someone A-OK. Or perhaps he just hates Southern Europeans and Irish, he’s said as much before.
I like to think Old Douche is our resident crazy old coot. Sort of like the old bum who hangs out at a dive bar mumbling senseless nothings. He’s harmless and clown-like if you don’t take him seriously.
1 July, 2010 at 12:41 pm
I have never seen any Roman Catholic ethnics who claim to be pagans posting here, Old Dutch. As Blackshirt says, ALL forms of christinsanity toxic to our race. Protestant or Catholic; it makes no difference. Their insane idea of a multi-racial “heaven” would be the White man’s hell.
1 July, 2010 at 12:52 pm
I don’t want to get sucked into this Catholic-Protestant spat. I try to avoid it. But I can’t resist pointing out that the Jews were allowed to slip back into England by Cromwell, a Protestant. In fact, I think Cromwell was funded by them and was in their pocket. Before that, the Catholic monarchs had kept them out. England gave the Jews a much bigger window of opportunity on the world than little Holland had provided. It was an enormous coup.
We read in all “official” accounts of these expulsions that the kings had plundered the Jews, robbed them, taxed them, exploited them, enriched themselves off them. Well, if it was the case that the Jews were so profitable to have around, then why did the kings get rid of them? Does that make any sense? Why would they expell the golden goose that was making them rich? But we only read today about how beneficial the Jews were, and how greedy the kings were.
And the Catholic church did have its Inquisition. So far as I know, there was never any such thing under the Protestants. In fact, Jews fled TO Protestant countries FROM Catholic ones, rarely if ever the reverse. Protestant countries were seen as more Jew-friendly — still hateful Christians, but a little better.
Many of the Protestant sects (e.g. the English Puritans) actually identified with Jews to the point that they imagined that they were Jews themselves. A lot of the more wacky fundamentalist sects today descend from this utter fantasy of being “lost tribes of Israel”, which explains their insane groveling to Jewish causes.
Also, it’s an intriguing fact that the Netherlands didn’t turn Protestant UNTIL the Jews moved themselves and their operations there from Portugal and Spain, thirsting for vengeance against the Church and the Hapsburgs. Suddenly, the Netherlands were in revolt! I wonder what the Jews had to do with that? Probably a lot. From then on, Europe was torn apart by Catholic-Protestant warfare for several centuries, at enormous cost of life and suffering… and some parts are still bitter even today. We even see it on this site.
I’ve never seen any scholarly examination of the connection of the Jews to the Reformation — but then it’s hardly likely that I ever would. Such a scholar would lose his tenure and his credibility and would be exiled to the Siberia of academic oblivion. And if he did write it, it wouldn’t get published anyway.
The Reformation weakened Europe drastically, split it in into two warring camps that expended their blood and resources in fighting each other. The Sultan in Turkey was jubilant at this development. To him, the Reformation was seen as a divine gift from Allah. Europe was lying at his feet, a ripe plum ready to be picked.
It was the Catholic powers who defeated the Turks at Lepanto and at Vienna, while the Protestants did little or nothing nothing to help Europe’s cause, and the Dutch were even aiding the Sultan. (Of course, the Catholic French were too. There is plenty of blame to be placed all around.)
The above may sound like I’m taking sides. I’m not! Just telling it like it is. Disunity has always been our worst plague.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
0
1 July, 2010 at 1:12 pm
Christians, pagans, agnostics, whatever… I don’t care.
Willy Nelson fans, Mozart afficionados, Nascar nuts, movie maniacs… to each his own.
White is white. We’re all the same family.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
1
1 July, 2010 at 2:59 pm
There is one thing I will have to say about Martin Luther. In his old age he began to realize what the kikes were really like and grew to despise them. He wrote a book entitled “The Jews and their Lies”, which made “Mein Kampf” seem like a Bedtime Story in comparison.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
1 July, 2010 at 4:57 pm
Likewise.
Slavs, Celts, Nordics, Meds, Lapps, Basques, etc…. were all the same family — all children of Mother Europa.
Over the centuries, there were some brood parasites that crept into her nest (Jews, Moors, Turks) but they were recognised and repeatedly kicked out. Now, theyre getting even with Europa by swamping her nest with cuckoo hatchlings from all over the world.
Semitic payback!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
4
1 July, 2010 at 5:27 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
4 
9
1 July, 2010 at 6:32 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
3 
12
1 July, 2010 at 7:59 pm
You’re a liberal, Blackshirt, so you can’t really talk.
A liberal is an enemy, simple as. Which you makes you an enemy.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
5
1 July, 2010 at 8:49 pm
According to Tim Blackshirt:
“When a White person’s mind is infected with Christinsanity, they are as good as dead to the race in my opinion. ”
And acording to Tim McGreen:
“most of them are Nordic”, and “will have to be liquidated when the time comes.”
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
Well, neither of you anti-nordic, discord-sowing, white-haters share anything in common with me!
But you have revealed your true selves. And not for the first time. Lets take due note of that.
Youre right in the same boat with Noel Ignatief, Susan Sontag, Farrakhan, and all the rest.
Yet, some good people here are so naive about Jews that they will still defend you! But in fact, it doesnt even matter if youre Jews or not. You amount to the same thing.
Is there a word for white-haters, by the way, something equivalent to “anti-semites”?
Well, there should be. We need one. Something like “blancophobes”, perhaps?
Ideas?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
12 
7
1 July, 2010 at 9:50 pm
“Joe” Says:
“You’re a liberal, Blackshirt, so you can’t really talk. A liberal is an enemy, simple as. Which you makes you an enemy. ”
First of all, who the fuck are you? Second, when have I ever called myself a “liberal”? Third, get it right you moron, I’m a Socialist, Racial/National Socialist that is.
If you are a right wing conservative YOU are the enemy, not me.
Hot debate. What do you think?
5 
7
1 July, 2010 at 11:13 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
1 
11
2 July, 2010 at 1:50 am
How can anyone who comes to this website possibly disagree with the statement I made in my post above? I suspect there is some fishy shit going on with this “yahoody” character and his friends putting thumbs down on posts. “Yahoody” and “Carpenter” show up out of nowhere and immediately start attacking me and other posters… seems like the return of agent McReen if you ask me- same M.O..
Hot debate. What do you think?
2 
6
2 July, 2010 at 2:45 am
McReen was a real hemorrhoid. But Carpenter and Yehudi are just a pain in the ass.
Hot debate. What do you think?
2 
6
2 July, 2010 at 8:54 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
0 
6
2 July, 2010 at 9:38 am
OD, you seem to be forgetting that it was the Catholic king Jan Sobieski from Poland who really saved the day at the battle of Vienna.
2 July, 2010 at 9:43 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
3 
8
2 July, 2010 at 1:57 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
2 
9
4 July, 2010 at 12:45 am
Blackshirt, you are wrong. Good Catholic Jan Sobiesky did NOT save the day at the Turkish siege of Vienna. Historians state, he hid with his troops during battle in the Vienna woods and prayed.
Sobiesky was in the pay of French king Louis XIV., who wanted the Turks to advance to the Rhine and was thus a secret ally of the Turks. I have stated details of their betrayal here years ago, you may find them the archives right.
4 July, 2010 at 3:00 am
Highly suspect! Can you give documentation for that?
If he wanted the Turks to win, why didn’t he join them in the battle and help? Why did he even go to Vienna at all?
This sounds like more trollish deception to me.
Somebody keeps tossing a wrench into the gears, and our trusting goys just don’t catch on that they’re being laughed at in Tel Aviv.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
5
5 July, 2010 at 3:02 am
Y.D. exhibits, I regret to state, a truly childlike naivite’ in historical and political matters.
Admittedly the vast majority, the so called masses (to which he belongs) are on his side. Too dumb to understand that politics has been for centuries and millenia a bit more sophisticated that Y.D. is able to grasp.
Politics aims to achieve an advantage, goal or purpose which has to kept hidden because its revelation would defeat it.
I give an example, which has been discussed here often:
The Jewish agenda to exploit state and country to their benefit is achieved in very roundabout way and its policy is to keep the masses in ignorance how it is pursued. Or: Y.D. may study the political tricks FDR used to bring the US into WW2.
As far that crook Sobiesky is concerned, he should look into the archive to the right, “Mel Gibson”: “Don’t give up on Mel Gibson”, 10-October 2006.
Hot debate. What do you think?
5 
5
5 July, 2010 at 2:25 pm
Arminius, you are being far too kind to Yahoody Douchebag, for he is more than just dumb or childishly naive. He is a FUCKING JERK.
Hot debate. What do you think?
7 
7
6 July, 2010 at 9:42 pm
I wish the low-rated comments did not get hidden. I would like to read them and see what they said. I can make up my own mind.
6 July, 2010 at 10:35 pm
They are not hidden Henry. Hit “press here to see”
8 July, 2010 at 9:59 pm
#1. Even so, they shoulddn’t hide them.
#2. Ohter thing: It just was on the news that “they” are investigating Mel Gibson for domestic abuse.
Hmmm. I wonder who “they” are? When Gibson had that run-in with the Jewish cop, and ran his mouth about Jews, I think that was his death sentence. Professionally anyway. They never forget and always manage to get even.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
13 July, 2010 at 7:41 am
“Henry Says:
6 July, 2010 at 9:42 pm
I wish the low-rated comments did not get hidden. I would like to read them and see what they said. I can make up my own mind.”
***********
I agree. I don’t like censorship of any kind. There is also way too much room for abuse of the thumbs up/down system, as exemplified by Yahoody and ZOG. They are allowed to get away with repeatedly clicking the thumbs down on my posts, while repeatedly clicking the thumbs up for their own.
Ideally, no one should be allowed to click yay or nay more than once per post. Those two clowns must have access to various computers with different IP addresses. It’s dishonest as all get out, but what do they care? They have no sense of decency. They’re just creeps. Creeps and cretins with no life, that’s what they are. And I will gladly tell them so to their ugly warthog-like faces if they have the courage to ask me. Which they don’t.
***************
On the advice of her scheming Jew lawyers, Mel Gibson’s slutty, gold-digging Russian ex-girlfriend made a recording of a drunken Gibson tirade over the phone. She was probably instructed by her well-paid Kikes on how to provoke the actor into saying certain unpleasant things so that they could be used as evidence against him in court and thus destroy his career.
Gibson is hardly the first actor with a drinking or temper-control problem. And unlike many other actors he’s not a fag, a dope-fiend or a sex-offender. But he has run afoul of the Sacred Ones and that is apparently the worst crime imaginable.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
13 July, 2010 at 9:50 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
1 
6