26 April, 2011

America Trying to Remake the Middle East for Israel’s Benefit

Posted by Socrates in 'Middle East', Israel, Israel - the facts, Ivor Benson, jewed Congress, jewed foreign policy, Socrates, Syria, Zionism at 4:24 pm | Permanent Link

What about us – is that remaking good for America? (It was a Jew, Dr. Gideon Shimoni, who noted that Zionism is actually Nazism for Jews. He observed that Zionism is “national in form and socialist in content,” i.e., national socialism [1]. In fact, the Jews even have their own concentration camps [in Gaza]. The difference between German Nazism and Jewish Nazism is that the latter is eagerly supported by America).

[Article].

[1] see the book “The Zionist Factor: the Jewish Impact on Twentieth Century History” (Costa Mesa, CA., The Noontide Press, 1992) by journalist/political analyst Ivor Benson, page 102. Benson says that Zionism and anti-Hitlerism can be summed up as: national socialism for Jews, international socialism for Whites


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 01/13/08 Carl Jung on the Jews 100% similar
  3. 05/19/08 It’s a Paradox 100% similar
  4. 10/29/08 A Hearing on the Anti-White Income Tax 93% similar
  5. 06/10/08 Nazism: a Threat to Children? 87% similar
  6. 01/27/08 America: a Capitalist Country? 85% similar
  7. 22 Responses to “America Trying to Remake the Middle East for Israel’s Benefit”

    1. Gerald E. P. Morris Says:

      The jewnited States gov’t is acting exactly as it was designed to: waging war against the enemies of jewry using mercenary armies from across the ocean, where Old Civilized Nations will have to expend lots of effort to get to the jew base. This is the jew game from the time of the proto-kike marine gangsters, Tyre and Carthage, which furnished the bulk of judaism’s converts after Righteous Aryan’s like Alexander (Tyre) and Cato the Elder (Carthage) stomped these nests of pure evil down.

      To stop jew-masonic-american depredations, america MUST BE DESTROYED UTTERLY!

    2. CW-2 Says:

      When ZOG collapses ‘America’ can be reborn as an Aryan republic or federation. Unfortunately that happy and hoped for event won’t be the end of our troubles, but the start of fresh ones as we push back the non-white hordes from all our lands.
      Will a future Cato the Elder arise to say, “furthermore Zionism must be destroyed”.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      CW, as a loyal subject of the Crown why aren’t you glued to the telly watching the Royal Wedding? Don’t you care what kind of silly hat Catherine Middleton is going to wear? What kind of a serf are you, anyway?

      Haw, haw.

      The uprising in Syria is obviously being fomented and financed by the CIA and MI-6. When the fake uprising inevitably gets cut down by government forces, that will give ZOG the justification for going ahead with Phase II, the “humanitarian” blockades and air-strikes. Phase III is when US mercenaries invade the country and brutalize the civilian population, especially the women. Phase IV is when a ruthless and corrupt puppet dictatorship is installed which takes its orders from Washington and a gigantic US “embassy” (actually a colonial administration fortress-palace) is built to help in carrying out “democratic reforms”, i.e., secret police units and government death-squads.

      I’ll give credit to ZOG for not getting the American public worked up about any of this. With no Draft, ZOG uses professional mercenaries, so the anesthetized public doesn’t give a damn one way or the other. The public will claim to support the troops, but they won’t hire any returning vets for fear of having a nut-job on their hands and they don’t want to hear about any of the endless conflicts their tax dollars are paying for.

    4. Bigduke6 Says:

      Well thought this would never happen. But, Obama and I have one thing in common. We both were not asked to attend the Royal Wedding.

    5. CW-2 Says:

      Well Tim, in my part of the “septred isle” we try to ignore the multiculti goings-on of London and a long time back we came to the conclusion that these half-hebe “royals” wouldn’t piss on us serfs if we were on fire.

    6. Nom de Guerre Says:

      In Orwells novel 1984, the America’s and England are one of the 3 axis of evil “Oceania”, and if you look at all the BS goo-goo gah gah over the royals wedding put on by the jew media you’d think we’d never fought a revolution. Hell, the so called whrlld news on PBS is broadcast by a fukking jew, and a few towel heads.

      I can almost believe those whacky Crixtling indentity bunch that say England was one of the ten tribes

    7. Nom de Guerre Says:

      Don’t ya just love that bullshit about rags to riches little girl, so progressive isn’t it? I don’t think the royals ever had any qualms about bedding commoners, especially after looking at that stable of royal mares, that look more like horses.
      Big D I’m really disappointed the royals didn’t invite your over for tea and cakes, if they read this column they’d probably have you thrown in the dungeon , to be drawn ,quartred and consigned to the fllames

    8. Nom de Guerre Says:

      http://www.wsws.org/articles/2011/apr2011/syri-a26.shtml
      GI Uncle Joe speaks @ “STATE OF THE UNION INTERIVIEW”

      Don’t get any ideas that America isn’t the lil Shittys bitch.

    9. MollyHayes Says:

      I would think that there is so much information like this coming to light , it make it obvious to everyone that there are no liberals or conservatives anymore, in the old sense of the definitions. There is one agenda and both sides continue to push it on the world, they simply take turns.

      I really cannot take anyone seriously who clings to the old false reality of left vs right. You might as well profess your belief that the sky gods drag the sun across the sky.

    10. Bigduke6 Says:

      Nom de guerre, you say we’d think we never fought a revolution. That brings up a lingering question that I have had on our war of independence from England. France backed the Colonies and sent troops and spent billions. France was hoping to become our trading partner after the war. But Ben Franklin was negotiating secretly with the Brits during the war. After the war Ben Franklin quickly establised England as our main trading partner. Did Ben Franklin, fuck France over? Some French lit prof told me at the time France’s govt was in shambles. My reply to him was they sure as hell wern’t in shambles when France sent troops and aid? Can anyone answer this?

    11. Nom de Guerre Says:

      Looks like the French turned out the loosers big time in North America. First the British and “American” colonists take over Canada, the king and queen lose their heads and perhaps millions of the best Frenchmen.. Whatever the American policy toward France has been the Same as the Jewnited Kingdom, they’re just a pawn used to evoke an invasion of Europe. When did the Kwa ever make a move on England? Say for deliberatly starving and invading Ireland? Or how about invading the Malvinas(Falklands).
      It’s a boards game riddle Big D.

    12. Nom de Guerre Says:

      Yeah it was Shambles BigD, why the poor folk of France were literally starving on thin gruel with no baguettes, and drinking water out of the sewers. While The English poor were being well taken care of with oatmeal and hagedis, drinking tumblers of whiskey while they laboured 16 hrs/day in the coaleries, or sewed Union Jacks for the “RoyaL” Navy to the tune of the lash. Oh of course if you were ill you could go to hospital in some bedlam or insane asylum. I’ve noticed that the American founders never took any swipes at the English for the piss poor treatment they gave the general populace.

    13. Nom de Guerre Says:

      America at the time of the Revolution, was mostly rural, even in the New England area, with its fisheries and nigger slave trade. They were dependent on articles manufactured in England by slave labouring Whites, no tears shed there heh? It was logical that such trade would continue with Muddah Fuggah England, rather than France, because it was cheaper, and you know the Yankee mentality of how to skin a cat.

    14. jayhackworth Says:

      They were also dependent to the extent of it being illegal to male a lot of their own stuff like nails due to what they call ‘mercantilism’.

    15. Nom de Guerre Says:

      “the extent of it being illegal to male a lot of their own stuff ”

      In Italy locals can produce their own wines, but when farmers in Western Pennsylvania tried to make their own Whiskey, in came George Washington with troops. That’s goverment with representation for you, or is that repression?

    16. Bigduke6 Says:

      Thanks Nom de guerre. You did answer my question. I made two trips to Frace in the past four years and found the French to be kind and gracious. As it goes with the Brits I found them to be quite smug and rude.

    17. Nom de Guerre Says:

      I was musing through some old encyclopedias , and looking at how the royal mug of Englands has degenerated. Picture of Henry the V11 whose mama was French, who looked quite handsome, and then Henry the V111 looking all bloated, yeah and from the intelligent looking to the bully boy.

    18. Nom de Guerre Says:

      The English know how to do tea right, nothing better than an English high tea with scones and strawberry jam

    19. Nom de Guerre Says:

      after Henry8, all the English Kings with the exception of the Stuart line , begin to resemble fat jowled porkers.

    20. CW-2 Says:

      There isn’t any hard evidence but IMHO all English kings after Richard III were either controlled by jews or were of jew ancestory. Much the same for France, Louis XIV was probably fathered by Cardinal Richelieu, and he by his actions was likely a big jew in deep cover.

    21. Tim McGreen Says:

      CW-2, what about Edward VIII? He certainly seemed to be free of Jew contamination. And his great grandmother Queen Victoria, along with Prince Albert, were as German as you can get, no? Didn’t the future Kaiser Wilhelm II spend his summers with his cousin the future George V in England? And wasn’t George V a cousin of the decidedly anti-Jew Tsar Nicholas II?

    22. CW-2 Says:

      Well Tim, that’s true. I was generalizing a bit too much and reflecting on events during the 17th century. Edward VIII managed to escape jew control and got the boot for his efforts, but let’s not forget that Queen Victoria was under the thumb of kike Disraeli.
      While ‘royal’ weddings are uppermost in the minds of the Brit lemmings it is instructive to travel back in time and see the wedding in 1911 of the future, and last, Emperor and Empress of Austria, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuisRljNcnY The women are elegant and although the military uniforms are a bit of a joke this was a totally Aryan event. The picture quality is very good and we are able to see Franz-Josef having a laugh while Franz Ferdinand fusses in the background with a bouquet of flowers.
      Compare that to Vienna of today, overrun with muds. Even Salzburg has a “vibrant Sudanese community”. Franz-Josef must be spinning in his grave.