29 April, 2012

Iran To Hold Talks With Globalists

Posted by Socrates in double standards, global government, globalization, international Jewry, international socialism, internationalism, Iran, Israel, Israel - the facts, NATO, nukes, UN, UN founders, Zionism at 2:17 am | Permanent Link

We learned in Political Science class that all countries have automatic sovereignty. In other words, whatever occurs within a country’s borders is no other country’s business. But that idea doesn’t seem to apply to countries that the Jews don’t like. (Apparently, the Jews aren’t worried about India or China having nukes. By the way, the UN is a Jewish-founded organization, and so is, by default, NATO. In fact, the Jews could be called the “godfathers of globalism” or, put another way, the “people who ended the sovereignty of nations.” Strangely, Israel enjoys its sovereignty, i.e., it doesn’t cooperate with international demands/mandates).

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 01/03/16 Two Things on Globalism/the NWO 47% similar
  3. 05/22/16 New World Order Doctrine Continues to Crumble Morally and Intellectually 42% similar
  4. 07/19/15 Globalism News 42% similar
  5. 08/08/08 South Ossetia: Globalists Getting Bold 42% similar
  6. 06/26/16 How Globalism and Communism are Similar 42% similar
  7. 16 Responses to “Iran To Hold Talks With Globalists”

    1. CW-2 Says:

      All the indications point to Iran not actually developing nuclear weapons but doing research into the capability to produce such weapons in response to future Israeli aggression. They just want the blueprints ready in the filing cabinet.
      The US and Israel both developed nuclear weaponry to blackmail other nations as part of their globalist ambitions. The Soviet jewion and China had or have similar goals. India went nuclear to relieve pressure from both Pakistan and China. What was the compelling reason for Britain and France to go nuclear? Both nations weren’t particularly threatened by Russia, the only plausible reason for expending vast sums on nuclear technology during the 1950’s was to keep the US at arm’s length.
      The British people are repeatedly told that nuclear weapons provide the ‘ultimate insurance policy’, well, that insurance policy hasn’t guaranteed or protected anything as Britain has been invaded, niggerized and is on the path to irrevocable destruction.

    2. Tim McGreen Says:

      ZOG, a.k.a., the Evil Empire, a.k.a., the USA, is going to go ahead with those IAEA talks in Vienna, but only to give the ILLUSION that Washington is genuinely interested in pursuing a diplomatic solution with Iran over its nuclear program. Horseshit. ZOG’s Jew representative will say that, despite the Administration’s “best efforts”, the talks were a failure and that the time for further diplomacy with the Iranian “regime” is at an end.* Then ZOG will have the “justification” to provoke Iran some more.

      Nice try, ZOG, but you’re not nearly as clever as you think you are…assholes.

      *Note how the government in Washington is just a nice, harmless and legitimate “administration”, while Iran is governed by a lawless, evil and criminal “regime”. The Jews are always developing new ways to use words as weapons of mass deception.

    3. Nom de Guerre Says:

      Too bad the Iranians aren’t as evil as the ZOG tries to portay them, we have to realize that Zog has a neurotic tendency to pick on the lesser evils, let some real bad booger arrive and Zog will booger off with its tail tucked between its shitty cheeks.

    4. Nom de Guerre Says:

      You know what’s stranger than the shittys behaviour to all the international bodies regulating nuclear proliferation,? It’s the bend over behaviour of all the nations, especially the Kwa, why wtf if jews attacka kwan naval vessel in international waters, and repeatedly strafe it and torpedo it, killing 30 plus seamen and officers. Heh, if you’ve got that kind of chutzpah it could only be something behind the scenes pulling the strings, like the Xian fifth column

    5. Arminius Says:

      Iran does not necessarily need an A-bomb. All it requires is a number of efficient medium range missiles (they have them) or bombs containing a conventional explosive payload with 20% radioactive uranium (which they are capable to produce) mixed in. One or few such devices detonated over TelAviv would clear the Shitty Jew City (SIC) of Jews for many decades.
      One wonders, why Iranians are begging to talk with their sworn enemies when they know, that maintaining sovereignty is not compatible with the Jewish demand to inspect every corner any time at will.
      Why don’t they declare: “From now on we do everything exactly as Israel does, and if Israel gets away with that, so can we!”

    6. fd Says:

      Political Science is an artificial subject invented in America. When is the last time that a politician applied the scientific method to his/her work. If politics is a science then every politician in America is a scientist……?

    7. Ray F. Bateson Says:

      Derp.

      The science of the political began when man first noted the patterns and principles of human group-dynamics, long, long before the kwa, hitler, machiavelli, aristotle and even the rabbis of old.

    8. bjt Says:

      Why worry about a country that could be wiped of the face
      of the earth with just one well equiped aircraft carrier from the USA?
      The People of Iran denied the holocaust that’s it nothing more.
      Try to have a fine one White Humans.
      Gon fishing.

    9. Dave Says:

      I just remembered something really funny and wanted to share. I once had a dumb wigger neighbor who refused to fight me. He burned a Swastika in my yard. The cops already know who I am so I called them. (he wouldnt fight me anyway). They gave him a ticket! Hahahah.

    10. jayhackworth Says:

      The Jewish Entity in Palestine totally undermines its case by refusing to allow inspections and being a non signatory to the NPT. “WHY?” is an excellent for which Israel, Israel-firsters, and BigJewMedia, Inc. have no convincing answers.

    11. Tim McGreen Says:

      The Jewish Entity in Palestine totally undermines its case by refusing to allow inspections and being a non signatory to the NPT. “WHY?” is an excellent for which Israel, Israel-firsters, and BigJewMedia, Inc. have no convincing answers.

      Jack, what the Jews and their goy flunkies do is instead of answering questions about Kikestan’s illegal nuclear bombs they will start KVETCHING about the Holohoax and terrorism, or they’ll go on and on about “existential threats to Israel”. They love using the phrase “existential threat” over and over again, as if they were Jean Paul Sartre, or something.

      At any rate we know all about their little Jew rhetorical tricks, so they have no power over us, homes.

    12. Tim McGreen Says:

      Sorry, I meant to say Jay, not Jack.

      Jack Hayworth, Jay Hackworth……Will I never get it right?

    13. Mary O Says:

      Recently I observed part of the “The View” playing on a TV placed in public area. This pack of rabid terriers were all barking at each other at once. One little blond terrier was yipping that Iran was so evil, and that anyone who doesn’t want war is a silly granola-eating leftover hippy. Whoopy Goldberg admitted that she fit that description, and all the terriers started yipping at once.

      Later on, the terriers were visited by Ryan O’Neil who has written an apparently melancholy & regretful memoir. The lead terrier (Barbara Walters) ripped into him with her savage little teeth. He was forced to admit that he had failed to be a good father to Tatum, and that he (not Hollywood in general) was solely responsible for her drug addiction, and that he hadn’t appreciated his deceased wife, even as she lay dying, and so and on and on … This confession was painful to hear.

      We need to ban White public apologies entirely. Who isn’t sick of hearing White men begging forgiveness for usually imaginary crimes (like “racism”)?

      Keep in mind this type of public apology never works. The terrier pack humiliated its quarry, but now will they be his loyal friend and tout his book? Their tones seemed too resentful and suspicious to believe that their hearts had changed towards him.

      O’Neill starred in the early 1970s anti-White agit-prop movie “Love Story,” by Harvard professor, Erich Segal, which gave us the ethnic slur, WASP, and the cultural stereotype of a supposedly dim-witted Anglo-Protestant “preppy” who needed an “ethnic” feminist to teach him how to have emotions.

      After all these decades, seems O’Neill still hasn’t tired of the “mea culpa” routine.

      Perhaps what both he and his character, Oliver Barrett, never realized that merely having emotions is not enough. You have to have the express the right emotions in an appropriate way.

      For example, O’Neill should have just told the terriers to shut up and mind their own business, or he would call the pound. And, thrown in that the dumb blond terrier couldn’t find Iran or even Israel on a map if her life depended on it.

      Remember: White means never having to say that you are sorry … to a bunch of rude little “celebrity” ditzes on TV.

    14. shabbos s shabazz Says:

      Tim doesn’t know Jack. . .

    15. Tim McGreen Says:

      The View is a propaganda tool that the Jews and their Jew-run CIA/State Department use to promote Zionist war-mongering horseshit on the dopey, unsuspecting daytime TV audience. What a bunch of yentas those old broads are. I like the one called Joy Behar, who tries to act Jewish but isn’t. And of course they’ve got that big Black Mamu who provides the token Black perspective. But needless to say the whole panel is run by the superannuated Jewess who calls herself “Barbara Walters”. I think her first reporting job was covering the Third Crusade.

    16. Howdy Doody Says:

      The View is a propaganda tool that the Jews and their Jew-run CIA/State Department use to promote Zionist war-mongering horseshit on the dopey, unsuspecting daytime TV audience. What a bunch of yentas those old broads are. I like the one called Joy Behar, who tries to act Jewish but isn’t. And of course they’ve got that big Black Mamu who provides the token Black perspective. But needless to say the whole panel is run by the superannuated Jewess who calls herself “Barbara Walters”. I think her first reporting job was covering the Third Crusade.