1 August, 2012

New Book About Race and IQ

Posted by Socrates in egalitarianism, IQ, race, race science, racial differences, racial science, Socrates at 1:15 pm | Permanent Link

It’s called “Intelligence: A Unifying Construct for the Social Sciences” by Richard Lynn & Tatu Vanhanen.

Available formats: hard cover, paper cover or e-book (pdf).

From the webpage about the book:


“Differences in intelligence help to explain all kinds of phenotypic social phenomena as well as the persistence of social inequalities in the world. Environmental factors affecting such phenomena vary from case to case, but intelligence reflecting the evolved human diversity remains the same explanatory factor across all phenotypic social phenomena. This means that it provides a unifying theoretical construct for the social sciences. Unfortunately social scientists have not yet realized that most problems explored in social sciences are phenotypic phenomena depending on both genotypic and environmental factors and that intelligence is a powerful genotypic common explanatory factor.”

[Webpage].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 05/19/14 Jews and Leftists Should Be Worried: Race is Becoming More Real Thanks to Hard Science, i.e., Genome Research 45% similar
  3. 01/26/17 Online Book About Race and IQ 44% similar
  4. 03/27/06 IQ These Days 38% similar
  5. 08/09/09 The Beauty and the Beast: Race and Racism in Europe, Part I 36% similar
  6. 11/10/07 Science May Reveal IQ Differences Between the Races 34% similar
  7. 5 Responses to “New Book About Race and IQ”

    1. CW-2 Says:

      Social ‘scientists’ seek to explain human group behavior without reference to the genotypes of individuals composing a particular group. To dignify these liberals by the appellation ‘scientist’ is an insult to real scientist who are fully aware of the importance of genetics, that is race, in the study of social development and cultural achievement.

    2. CW-2 Says:

      PS Apologies for bad phrasing. No insult to the authors was intended, they have confronted the liberals head-on.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      But it’s not just intelligence that matters. The Orientals, especially the Chinks and Japs, consistently score slightly higher than Whites on every known IQ test. Yet they do not possess the individual creativity that Whites do, so their intelligence is static, like the intelligence of certain insects. White intelligence, by contrast, is very dynamic.

      The creative aspect of White intelligence makes it possible for Whites to innovate and progress. Whatever technological advances the Orientals enjoy are due exclusively to Whites. If not for White technology the Yellow races would, at best, have a 13th century level of technological development. Yet even that level of achievement would be thousands of years ahead of Negroes and New World Savages.

    4. fd Says:

      The Chinese and Japanese are a petrified people. Without their awakening by waves of Aryans, they would still have a 19th centur mentality. Most everything they do is copycat. Why do the above mentioned prefer White learning institutions over their schools ?

      IQ test do not measure personal intellligence. The test measures your score against a group who took the same test.

    5. Waldo Starr Says:

      A person can be highly intelligent and creative, but if they are also superstitious and believe all the egalitarian bullshit, then that person and his offspring are done.