22 September, 2012

Quickie Divorces, Again

Posted by Socrates in divorce, divorce laws, jewed culture, no-fault divorce, Reagan, Socrates at 1:56 pm | Permanent Link

Seen: someone on TV complaining about the high rate of divorce in America and divorce’s negative impact on children.

Newbies, back in 1955, it was rather difficult to get a divorce. But today, due to “no-fault” divorce laws, a divorce is quick and easy. No need to try and make the marriage work, you can bail out of it in a few days! Trivia: Women file for divorce more often than men do. More trivia: In the 1940s, a Jewish lawyer named Matilda Fenberg spearheaded the effort to create “model legislation” for no-fault divorce laws in America [1]. Still more trivia: California governor Ronald Reagan signed a no-fault divorce bill into law in 1969 – yes, him, the big conservative hero!

[1] Fenberg (1887-1977), born in Poland, was chairman of the National Association of Women Lawyers’ (NAWL) Uniform Marriage and Divorce Law Committee

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 11/20/08 Quickie Divorces 100% similar
  3. 02/12/08 Modern Divorce 49% similar
  4. 06/12/12 Our Anti-Male, Easy-Divorce Culture 47% similar
  5. 04/29/18 Some Good Points About Marriage 46% similar
  6. 10/07/16 Who Wants to Marry a Feminist? 44% similar
  7. 12 Responses to “Quickie Divorces, Again”

    1. Tim McGreen Says:

      The fact that the Blight Wing venerates Ronald Ray-Gun shows how dumb those people really are. To hear idiots like Hannity and Beck describe the Reagan Years you’d think it was some kind of mythological Golden Age. The reality is that Reagan greatly expanded the size and power of ZOG. His “administration” was also the one that began the present war on White working class and middle class America. This country is a lot poorer, darker and more tyrannical now than it was in 1980. You can thank those Reagan-Bush assholes for that.

      Reagan was about as much of a kahnservative as that other good for nothing California governor, Jerry “Moonbeam” Brown. But trying to explain that a kahnservative would be an exasperating exercise in futility.

    2. Tim McGreen Says:

      I’m certainly no Democrat, but I would just like to point out that there are a lot more divorces, alcoholics and nudie bars in so-called Red States than in the Blue ones. Republican Family Values…pppfffftthththpppptttt.

    3. Nom de Guerre Says:

      They’re is alot more wrong with kwanservatives than meets the eye, watch the walk and not the talk.. Take for instance Wonny Wayguns shift from active Liberal Hollywood actor, pro-Roosenfelt demotwit over to squishy doughboy for kwanservative values.. Okay maybe some backbone, on occasion but mostly luv be tubby with the core values of liberals and muds, just like Dwitt Womneys latest mouthing ” I want to be president for the 100% of Amerikwans!”. Yes, the only honest thing Mitt said, was that 47 % of Kwans wouldn’t have him to stepn’fetch for Hymie under any circumstances. Wow, as of we haven’t yet figured out who owns both parties. Stalin said it best ” it isn’t who votes, its who counts the votes.

    4. Nom de Guerre Says:

      The truth is marriage is a social contract, not made in heaven, so if we want to keep marriages together we have to tighten the screws on those who want to dissolve it under frivolous legal shennagins, say do the King Shlomo dividing the spoils ala draw and quarter the offspring.

      The State the Race are one, that means nobody, not nobody can pick and choose their mate. We don’t go back to figure out what went wrong, we grow up, We don’t create emotional cripples who haven’t cut the apron string s from mommy and daddy, only to make their wife a domestic terrorist, raising her husband. Amerikwans are the worst marriages in the world, thus said Carl Jung, because they’ve got to many choices. As for Women Herman Hesse wrote in Journey to the East, “those who live long must serve”, after a woman has a child she’s forgotten and the Child takes center place in her life.

    5. Nom de Guerre Says:

      The real bonds of a racial society are communal, not the brother sister mommy daddy nonsense of the nookular family.. Which means nobody has any qualms about removing a sibling from the flock if they perform or behave improperly.
      The Romans knew this, when Julius Caesar got to big for his toga, they decided to ventilate him.. America alway prospered when we had more mediocre men in office, those that want to be great need to viewed with great suspicion, as narcissist a most deadly disease

    6. Sgt. Skull Says:

      The divorce laws are set up to totally screw men. They should be changed so that if a woman files she gets no alimony and only limited child support. I’ve heard of cases where women demand more child support and when they get it use the money for themselves or their new boyfriends instead of the children.

    7. Howdy Doody Says:

      Men totally wronged, by an insane wife, and female feminist judge may appeal, but 99% of the time more money and time was wasted.

      Divorce laws insane, and hurt children.

      Have know about a dozen divorce’s with children.

      In the end the children become Troubled whites.

      I worked with a 40 year old White male two years ago. He has family of his own.

      Here is a comment by a 40 year old White male.

      When my mother divorced by father, I said I would never listen to any man from that day.

      He is unread, and severely ignorant. Yet my guess is his I.Q. is around 115.

    8. Tim McGreen Says:

      Judges are biased against awarding custody of the chillun to the father in divorce cases. But why is that? A lot of times the divorced mother can’t handle the kids, especially a teenage daughter. And like Sgt. Skull says those divorced moms often spend more money on themselves or their new scumbag boyfriends than on their kids. There are also a lot of cases where the scumbag boyfriend moves in and molests the daughter while the mother looks the other way and pretends she doesn’t know what’s going on.

      And yet the stupid divorce court judges NEVER take any of that into consideration!

    9. -jc Says:

      “But why is that?” You think divorce court judges are stupid?

    10. Howdy Doody Says:

      Of course the post 1945 divorce laws were foisted on US as a reward for killing our selves for saving their Kosher bacon in 1945.

      After 1945 with Europe flat on itz back, they and Hollywood brain washing kike center to give US their full frontal guilt war and propaganda mind rape for White children in their theaters and con”trolled” public schools.

      Threats of violence and war since 1945, ah can smell that defeat yet ?

    11. Howdy Doody Says:

      Judges are 100% P.C. supporters in 99% of cases.

    12. susan Says:

      Of course, when I was little, it was almost always the husband who initiated the divorce so he could marry his little twenty year old *ussy. The wife and children from the first marriage had to move and their standard of living almost always went way down as a result.

      The children from the first marriage were put on the back burner by their father, while he became a new father with his new wife, the trophy airhead.

      Somewhere along the way, things got turned around.

      Of course, men didn’t complain back then. They only complain now that the tables are turned.

      I think if a husband and wife have children the divorce ought to be difficult to obtain. One of them should have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the other spouse is abusive in some way: physically, emotionally, etc.

      The lives of too many White children are being ruined because Joe and Sally are selfish idiots.

      Bottom line of course: If you’re going to get married and have children, be prepared to stick the marriage out until the last child has graduated high school and moved away.

      I am constantly amazed at the utter selfishness of parents and their complete disregard for the well being of their children.