25 January, 2013

Jews: Always Trying to Disarm White People

Posted by Socrates in guns & goy controllers, guns and gun issues, jewed Congress, jewed culture, jewed law, Socrates at 3:04 pm | Permanent Link

Once again, Jewish politicians are trying to take away your guns. As you may recall, Feinstein created the “assault rifle” ban back in 1994. (By the way, it has now been revealed that an “assault rifle” was not used in the Newtown, Connecticut school shooting as previously reported by the media).

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 12/16/12 Jews: Always Waiting for an Opportunity to Abolish Your Constitutional Rights 59% similar
  3. 11/06/08 Gun Sales Surge After Election 54% similar
  4. 12/20/12 Evil Assault Rifles That Aren’t 49% similar
  5. 07/03/16 Still More Goy Control: Jewish Congressman Grayson Introduces “Assault Rifle” Ban Bill 48% similar
  6. 04/06/18 Constitution? What Constitution? 46% similar
  7. 12 Responses to “Jews: Always Trying to Disarm White People”

    1. Jürgen Says:

      jews can “legislate” all they want,
      problem is, when they actually send
      their goons to enforce it, armed conflict
      with the militias will definitely start.

    2. Tim McGreen Says:

      There is a saying in the legal profession that bad cases make for bad laws. The Jewtown, Ct shooting is a classic example of an extreme and sensationalized event being used as a justification for imposing draconian new laws.

      I’m curious, did anyone inside the Sandy Hook school actually see the retard Adam Lanza breaking in or walking around the property with a gun? Did anyone see him at all anywhere near or in the school that morning?

      No, they did not. No one reported Lanza being in school that morning, or on any other morning. No one saw him walking the halls with a gun; no one saw him shoot anyone; The pigs never reported removing his body from the school; No one has said what happened to Lanza’s body. Was it cremated? Buried in an unmarked grave? Or did he ever exist at all?

      We are being seriously bullshitted here, people. A very mysterious incident is being used as a justification for imposing more Federal tyranny on millions of law abiding gun owners. Don’t let that evil mulatto dictator get away with this.

    3. Stan Sikorski Says:

      There once was a man who knew,
      That the world was controlled by the jew.
      They came for his guns and he said he had none,
      But he took them all out with a nuke!

      Read: The Turner Diaries

    4. Sgt. Skull Says:

      Let’s see, first Metzenbaum, then Schumer, Feinstein, Boxer, Nadler, Rahm Emanuel are the leading anti-gunners while mayor Bloomberg and George Soros serve as financiers. The anti-second amendment/gun confiscation movement can be summed up as jews, jews and more jews.

      And if the gentile hating kikes and their head nigger in charge in the oval office ever decide to go door to door I guarantee they’ll use mostly niggers, mestizos and fags to do the dirty work since these groups hate straight, red blooded white men.

    5. CW-2 Says:

      I envy you guys, you can actually walk into your local gun shop hand over a few dollars and walk out with some pretty good self-protection hardware! So don’t moan about what big jew is planning on doing to your right to bear arms, get equipped NOW while it is still possible.
      So your wife doesn’t like guns in the house, well winterize your gear and hide it where the feds won’t think of looking.

    6. John Q. Republic Says:

      Jesus H. Christ!

      The ignorance of the general public when it comes to guns and gun laws in this country is astounding.

      Because there has has been so much INTENTIONAL mass-media, and in-general, governmental misinformation and disinformation about guns that’s been spewing out for so many decades now, that not many people even realize that there is actually a difference between an “assault weapon” and an “assault rifle”. And, most people don’t seem to have a clue about what the Second Amendment is, or what the true intent and purpose the amendment was to serve and why the Founding Fathers included it in the Constitution in the first place. Most have this media-fed, vague impression that the 2nd Amendment gives Americans the right to go hunting or target shooting, or in “extreme” (?) cases, home defense. Well, that is true, BUT the Second Amendment is much more that that. As the Founding Fathers INTENTED it to be, it was as a last resort option for the PEOPLE, (Note: NOT the National Guard, the police, the “professional military”, and most certainly NOT the Government; and when all peaceable petitions of grievance to said Government had failed, or were ignored, and Government had become tyrannical and no longer served the interests of the people), to the citizenry, in general. It was not only a RIGHT of the people, but a DUTY of the people to resist that tyranny by ARMS–FIREARMS–and all other implements of war available to the people. The Second Amendment is etched in stone, folks. NO LAW enacted since it’s inception is Constitutionally LEGAL. Not one! What we’ve been seeing since at least the 1960’s is an attempt to circumvent the law of the land, the Constitution, by extra-legal means to attempt to deny you your Second Amendment Right.

      Contrary to popular belief, the Government DOES NOT have the right to exist. It exists ONLY at OUR discretion. We can choose to abolish it at any time.

      Reading the opinion or letters-to-the-editor sections of any newspaper, (in print or online), makes my stomach turn when it comes to guns or the Second Amendment. It is nearly ALWAYS anti-gun or anti-Second Amendment in tone and level of hysteria–even from some gun owners themselves who say they are for gun rights, but want to institute what THEY see as an “appropriate level of protection” that they think YOU should have, i.e. no more high capacity/
      detatchable magazines , ammunition restrictions, no “military-style” weapons, no folding-stocks, etc., etc., ad nauseum. In effect, nearly agreeing with almost everything Dianne Kikestein, her fellow kike buddies, and deluded, self-loathing, White race-traitors, want………..for right now. Of course, we all know the eventual aim is to completely disarm White Americans for eventual physical destruction by their armed-to-the-teeth goon squads and U.N. troops.

      BTW: The main difference between a so-called “assault weapon” (really a false, mass-media inspired term to frighten the general public), and an “assault rifle” is that an assault weapon can only fire in semi-automatic mode while an assault rifle is a select-fire/fully-automatic firearm. A lot of Americans think that it’s illegal to own fully automatic firearms, but that’s not true. You still can, however, you have to jump thru a lot of legal and financial hoops to get one.

      As an ex-GI, and Nam and Gulf War 1 era veteran, with combat arms, administration, and supply experience, I think it encumbant on us to lead by example in defending our Second Amendment Right. George Washington, himself, in a line from a statement he made said: “Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself.” O course, he was speaking of We, The People– not We, The Government– in stating the importance of civilian ownership of the gun. How right he was.

      Good posts everyone!

      J.Q.R.

    7. Howdy Doody Says:

      Patriotards/evanjellyculls brain defective idiot’s actually yell itz liberials, as they can’t see the foul joo in broad day light coming for what ever wealth they have and freedom to be removed like the in old USSR.

      Any White’s who are NPR or evanjellyculls cultist’s need to put the Sunglasses on now.

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ds3vaSwZ8LA

      My guess is that most of White males left in the alphabet force’s are evanjellyculls for a paycheck, The Bill Of Right’s and Open borders with Chicom’s allowed to buy up Canada and US means nothing to them IMO

    8. CW-2 Says:

      Exactly correct! all governments exist to serve the people and no one else. We surrender our inalienable rights to governing institutions so that they may better serve our interests. When any government no longer serves the interests of the people and instead become hostile to the people, as have the governments in ALL Western nations, then those institutions loose ALL legality and have no claim on our allegiance.

    9. Jürgen Says:

      This Chief of Police is not budging one iota.
      This will eventually become armed conflict
      with the Feds, and it needs to:

      http://www.prisonplanet.com/police-chief-vows-to-stop-tyrannical-thugs-from-disarming-americans.html

    10. John Q. Republic Says:

      Correction: incumbent

      J.Q.R.

    11. John Q. Republic Says:

      Pardon the further corrections:

      Only 1 has, instead of has has.

      than that–rather than that that.

      Of–rather than O.

      Should have proofread much closer before sending, but was fairly busy yesterday wth a couple of projects and rushed it.

      J.Q.R.

    12. jon Says:

      why did the govt just buy 7000 machine guns and 1.5 billion rounds of hollow point ammo? why are their cameras every where? why do they want to use drones to kill americans. why is there no budget or a real jobs program? why did they bring in NAFTA to take our jobs? why are they giving america over to agenda21 and u.n. control. why are business folding up? why did they let the bankers destroy the economy and then pay them off with stimlus tax dollars robbing america blind. NOW YOU KNOW WHY THEY WANT YOUR GUNS.