18 February, 2013

A Black Male = a Penis With Legs

Posted by Socrates in black behavior, black crime, black culture, black sex-drive, blacks, Socrates at 2:39 pm | Permanent Link

Blacks are so oversexed that even men aren’t safe from their “muh dick” fixation – knowwutmsayin’?

[Article].


  • 7 Responses to “A Black Male = a Penis With Legs”

    1. CW-2 Says:
      18 February, 2013 at 5:01 pm

      Time to state what we all know to be true but are afraid to say in polite society, namely the black dick is the jewish weapon of choice against the White world.
      Recently globalist elites and churches have also taken a keen hold of this weapon too.

    2. Virgil Says:
      19 February, 2013 at 1:51 am

      All the whites in S.A. should evacuate a.s.a.p. to I am not sure where because the western governments will not open their doors(except Georgia,of all countries)to them. They will have to find a way out. I assume they could just go to some other western nation as a “tourist”,with absolutely minimal baggage so as to mask the fact that you are escaping a black-ruled hell,and then remain there, somehow, once their tourist visa expires. The whites are outgunned and no other nation will liberate them. Escape is the one remaining option.

    3. CW-2 Says:
      19 February, 2013 at 5:31 am

      Dr Pierce in one of his broadcasts said White South Africans made 2 fatal mistakes; they relied on black labor to do the jobs they didn’t want to do, and they placed too much faith the the ‘special relationship’, a non-existent one as it turned out, with their church.
      Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but the wealth created by the South African economic powerhouse was siphoned off to breed-up the Black population, big mistake! The Whites should have looked to historical precedent and instead of engaging in rapid economic expansion which only benefited jewish capitalists, they should have consolidated the volk-stadt as two White only republics. This was Paul Kruger’s initial policy until the discovery of gold in the Transvaal resulted in the joint jewish-British war of aggression against the White population.

    4. Al Gator Says:
      19 February, 2013 at 7:53 pm

      There are enough White south africans to re-invade Rhodesia. Chase out the scum Moograbwee and they would have one of the richest, most productive countries on the continent.

      In the 19th and early 20th centuries, this would have happened.

      The White man has lost something in his constitutional make up, he needs to get it back or perish.

    5. S.U.N. Says:
      19 February, 2013 at 9:01 pm

      Hundreds of Afrikaner expats won’t return to Zuid Afrika because nothing remains of the political and social framework they built since 1948.

    6. CW-2 Says:
      20 February, 2013 at 5:04 pm

      Colonialism makes sense only if the effort results in establishing new lands suitable for exclusive habitation by Whites. France initially followed this policy when they annexed Algeria in 1830. The Arab population was quite small and the French figured they could quickly form a large European population by encouraging migration not just from France but also from Spain and Italy. Of course the colonial scheme didn’t go according to plan because the Arab population was able to grow at a faster rate on account of the improved health and education generated by White economic activity.
      The mistakes of the 19th century have now expanded to monstrous proportions as an increasing percentage of economic activity, even within the White homelands, is now directed to producing food and benefits for the non-White world. An insane policy which can only end in terrible bloodshed on a global scale.

    7. Tim McGreen Says:
      20 February, 2013 at 6:48 pm

      This great A. Wyatt Mann cartoon says it all:http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/NIGGERS/nig_image71.jpg