22 April, 2013

Today’s News

Posted by Alex Linder in Letters at 8:28 pm | Permanent Link

VNNForum.com, DDOS attack. Updates here, if any.

White news from the in box and wires…


NGO Support for Lemire’s Case Against Censorship
Submitted by admin on Tue, 04/09/2013 – 06:47

As the webmaster of websites containing material which is hated by many powerful lobby groups, Marc Lemire (photo) has been in the crosshairs of his home country’s government censors for over a decade. Long alone in his battle, he has now received major support.

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has filed an intervention application at the Canadian Federal Court of Appeals. They are seeking to rid Canada of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act, which is Canada’s shameful Internet censorship legislation. The CCLA recently described their intervention in the Lemire case as follows:

“The CCLA will be intervening to support the Tribunal’s ruling and the recognition of the chilling, self-censoring effect these laws can have on individuals. The CCLA has long advocated that this law is a vague and unjustifiable restriction on freedom of expression that should be struck down.”

The Canadian Civil Liberties Association is one of Canada’s premier organizations protecting freedom of speech. According to the Affidavit of Cara Zwibel, the CCLA was “Founded in 1964, the CCLA is a national organization dedicated to the furtherance of civil liberties in Canada … As a staunch defender of freedom of expression, the CCLA has made submissions and provided advice on a range of issues to various levels of government.”

CODOH opines that it was about time for major civil liberties associations do their job and help defend those who are most threatened: marginalized groups hated by the power that be.

Read Marc Lemire’s take on this new development and please also honor his call for support in this epic, historic battle.



  • 11 Responses to “Today’s News”

    1. Alex Linder Says:

      gas van Big Lies debunked


      the race perpetrating these atrocity lies is very likely the same one DDOSing our forum

    2. Alex Linder Says:

      [free speech under attack in Canada]

      Preliminary Hearing Delayed in Arthur Topham “Hate” Case — Update

      We forward Arthur Topham’s latest update on his Sec. 319 “hate law” case, resulting from complaints by B’nai Brith’s Harry Abrams and complainer-in-chief Richard Warman. This is a crucial case, as it involves the Internet. Mr. Topham, first with a now-stayed Sec. 13 complaint by Abrams, and now with the Criminal Code charges has been in the censors’ sights for a half dozen years. The late Doug Christie was Mr. Topham’s lawyer. With or without counsel, the impoverished Mr. Topham will battle on and we must support him — morally, financially and with advice.

      Paul Fromm

      April 19, 2013

      Dear Free Speech Advocates and Radical Press Supporters,

      It’s been quite awhile since my last update which went out in late February. My apologies to all of you who have been left wondering what’s been going on with my legal battle with the Jewish lobbyists here in Canada.

      A rather long string of unforeseen events, most notably the death of my lawyer Douglas Christie back on March 11th, 2013, threw a monkey-wrench into the whole process. Then, just prior to the Easter long weekend in March, I came down with a rather wicked, unrelenting “bug” that knocked the wind out of my sails for a few weeks. Only recently have I been able to regain my course.

      Of course, there being no rest for the wicked, all of my personal issues, including the passing of Doug Christie, didn’t slow down the onerous movement of the wheels of justice here in Zionist Occupied Canada.

      As such I’ll do my best to be concise as possible and try to outline where my case stands at present.

      Last Tuesday, April 16th, 2013 I appeared once again in provincial court in Quesnel. Prior to this date I had been in the same courtroom back on Tuesday, April 2nd, 2013 to attend what was originally supposed to be a hearing to deal with matters pertaining to the upcoming Preliminary Hearing on my Sec. 319(2) Criminal charge that had been scheduled to begin June 3 – 6, 2013.

      Upon the death of Mr. Christie I wrote to Crown Counsel Jennifer Johnston on March 12th, 2013 and informed her that because of this unfortunate event I would not be prepared to deal with anything at that time.

      When I did appear on the April 2nd I informed Judge Morgan of my situation and the fact that I was without legal counsel. At the same time I advised the Judge that I was planning to submit what is known as a Rowbotham application to the court – a Rowbotham application being a legal document wherein an accused person who has been refused legal aid and who cannot afford a lawyer and who is facing a criminal charge that could include a jail sentence if found guilty can apply to the court to have the government appoint a lawyer if the case is deemed serious enough and the applicant (accused) can show that they aren’t in a position to afford a lawyer nor are they capable of defending themselves due to the complexity of the case.

      Judge Morgan then gave me 14 days to prepare the Rowbotham application and set the next date for Tuesday, April 16th, 2013.

      Still reeling from the viral infection I did my best to get all the paperwork done by the 16th. For the most part it was complete but in the interim period, on the advice of a lawyer, after reading through some of my previous correspondence with former counsel Doug Christie, I decided to make a second application to the court for an order wherein the Crown would have to furnish me with what is known as “particularization” of the Information. Allow me to explain what that is.

      When Crown eventually got around to releasing Disclosure (basically their evidence) of the information surrounding the sec. 319(2) Criminal charge against me on January 31st, 2013 (after an eight and a half month delay!), it became fairly evident that they had scrapped together as much miscellaneous documentation that they could possibly come up with (My immediate impression was that he who had the most pages, regardless of their relevancy, would win). Disclosure showed that there was over a 1,000 pages of purported evidence that my lawyer was then going to have to wade through.

      Given this fact Doug had expressed to me some time after receiving the Disclosure disks that it would be extremely difficult to determine how long a potential trial might take considering that the over 1,000 pages of disclosure contained no real indication as to which of my writings they intended to focus on at trial. If they planned to go through it all and Doug had to raise defences of truth, fair comment, etc. over and over for everything that I’d ever written, (not to mention other writers included in the Disclosure) a four-week trial wasn’t that unrealistic. Thus the need to seek particularization of the disclosure.

      On April 10th, 2013 I made an Application to a Judge for the following order: “Particularization of Information” and I based my reasons on the following statement:

      “The Crown has provided over 1,000 pages of disclosure, including a broad array of material written by myself (the accused). The Crown has failed to indicate which of this material constitutes “willful promotion of hatred” within the meaning of Section 319(2), and which of the alleged hateful material is not covered by one of the defences in Section 319(3). Without specifics as to which of my writings are alleged to be hateful, it is impossible for me to make an accurate time estimate as to the length of the trial, or indeed to make full answer and defence.”

      Part of the reason for making this application was the fact that in order to complete the Rowbotham application it was necessary for me to indicate the duration of any potential trial in order to get an estimate of the cost for hiring a counsel for that period.

      Judge Morgan wasn’t present on the morning of April 16th and I appeared before a Justice instead. She asked me if the Rowbotham application had been filed yet and I informed her that it had not but that it would be completed that same day. She then told me that it was the intent of the court to go ahead and set a new date for the preliminary hearing regardless of whether I had counsel or not. Crown also indicated that the likelihood the original dates set for the preliminary hearing would still work were unlikely. The Justice then informed the Crown that unless a date was set soon it would mean a rather long delay again because at that point the earliest a preliminary hearing might be heard was already November or December of 2013.

      Following this discussion the Justice then moved on to my most recent application of April 10th and instructed me to come to her office at 1:30 pm that same day and she would then tell me what the dates would be for a hearing for the “particularization” application and for the preliminary trial.

      As I had all the documents with me to complete the Rowbotham application I spend the remainder of the morning completing and filing it. Part of that procedure entails sending both a sworn Affidavit and also what is known as a “Notice of Application and Constitutional Issue” to three separate parties, the Crown Counsel, the Attorney General of Canada and the Attorney General of British Columbia.

      By my afternoon appointment with the Justice I had all these documents filed and sent off. In the process I also filed another document with the court registry. This one was called a “Memorandum of Argument Regarding Indictment”. Basically it is a document that argues the reasons (as stated in case law) for why particularization of the Disclosure is vital to my defence.

      Now, speaking of my Defences in this case I will quote below precisely what these are as they appear in the Canadian Criminal Code. This is where the chutzpah of those who have been instrumental in the laying of this specious charge will be most clearly evident, given that a jury of twelve of my peers would have to unanimously agree that none of the defences listed below, were relevant. Further information on the actual nature of the Section 319(2) charge I’ll deal with in future posts.

      Under Section 319(3) of the Criminal Code of Canada we see the following:

      (3) No person shall be convicted of an offence under subsection (2)
      (a) if he establishes that the statements communicated were true;
      (b) if, in good faith, the person expressed or attempted to establish by an argument an
      opinion on a religious subject or an opinion based on a belief in a religious text;
      (c) if the statements were relevant to any subject of public interest, the discussion of
      which was for the public benefit, and if on reasonable grounds he believed them to be
      true; or
      (d) if, in good faith, he intended to point out, for the purpose of removal, matters
      producing or tending to produce feelings of hatred toward an identifiable group in

      When I met with the Justice at 1: 30 pm on April 16th she had some new information to add to what she’d told me earlier in the morning. I’m presuming this had to do with the fact that in the interim period I had filed the Rowbotham application as well as the additional “Memorandum of Argument Regarding Indictment”. The Justice told me that they weren’t clear at this point regarding the Rowbotham application and they were therefore assuming that once the Attorney General of B.C. received the application that the AG’s office would then send me further instructions as to what additional information I must furnish the court with in order that a hearing on the Rowbotham application might then be set. the Justice appeared to think that I would receive these instructions and be able to respond to them by the 16th of May, 2013 and so she set that date for my next appearance; one which would also include speaking to my April 10th application regarding “Particularization of Information”.

      I trust that all my readers have this clearly in their minds by now. :-)

      I’ll summarize this update with one final editorial comment. By all appearances it would seem that there will be a concerted and determined effort on the part of the Crown aka Attorney General of B.C. to have this Rowbotham application quashed or denied. Why? Well, from speaking with other counsel who are in the know, it seems that the government really doesn’t like it when an innocent and financially challenged person is accused of a criminal offence and then displays the audacity to expect that the Crown would ensure that they have professional legal counsel in order to deal with all the spurious and specious accusations made against them. Unfortunately, for them, they have to deal with both the Constitutional Question Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 68, Section 8; and the Constitution Act, 1982, Part 1, Sections 7, 11 (d) and 24(1), both of which protect my inherent right to a fair trial and defence.

      So it goeth out here in Lotus Land as of April 19th, 2013 as the free speech advocates continue their struggle to rid our nation of foreign Zionist interlopers hell-bent on destroying our country, our institutions and our democratic way of life by entrenching their heinous “hate crime laws” in our judicial system so as to cover up their own actions against Canada.

      Stay tuned folks!

      For Justice and Freedom of Speech for Everyone,

      Arthur Topham
      Publisher & Editor
      The Radical Press
      “Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”

    3. Alex Linder Says:


      April 19, 2013 12:00 AM
      The Deportation Lie

      The Obama administration cooks the enforcement books. By Andrew Stiles

      It is one of the Obama administration’s favorite talking points on immigration: It has been deporting illegal immigrants in record numbers. That bolsters its credentials on enforcement and supports the argument that, now that we’ve gotten tough on the border, it is time to enact comprehensive immigration reform.

      But figures recently unearthed by a federal lawsuit in Texas cast serious doubt on the administration’s deportation claims. The number of deportations appears to have declined significantly during the president’s term in office.

      Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies for the Center for Immigration Studies, has analyzed a set of largely unpublished official statistics on immigration-enforcement activity over the past five years. Earlier this month, Vaughan testified in court on behalf of a group of U.S. Immigration and Customs (ICE) agents who are suing the administration over its use of “prosecutorial discretion” in dictating how immigration law is enforced — or not enforced. The agents are seeking an injunction against a series of policy directives from ICE and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) that were designed to regulate the extent to which ICE officers could initiate deportation proceedings for illegal immigrants in their custody.

      In her testimony on April 8, Vaughan noted that, contrary to the administration’s claims, the number of illegal-immigrant removals has dropped 40 percent since June 2011, when ICE director John Morton issued the first of several directives outlining significant changes to the agency’s enforcement policies. “There has been a significant decline in enforcement activity as measured by the number of removals,” Vaughan says.

      Deportations specifically of illegal immigrants convicted of a crime — individuals the administration says it has prioritized for removal — are similarly down, almost 40 percent since June 2011, Vaughan found. And that decline has occurred despite a significant increase in the number of illegal immigrants referred to ICE after being arrested for crimes. “There are certainly enough illegal aliens out there, especially enough criminal illegal aliens, that their numbers should be going up, not down,” Vaughan says. “So they appear to be giving a lot of free passes to people who are a public-safety problem, beyond the fact that they are here illegally.”

      Removals generated by ICE’s Enforcement and Removals division, which is responsible for interior immigration enforcement, have decreased nearly 50 percent since June 2011. Vaughan says the administration has been inflating its deportation statistics by including a greater number of U.S. Border Patrol cases — illegal immigrants picked up at the border and subsequently referred to ICE — as part of its annual statistics. Border Patrol cases accounted for 56 percent of removals reported in fiscal year 2013, up from 33 percent in 2008. Typically, an individual apprehended at the southern border is simply returned to Mexico without being processed as a deportation by ICE.

      Vaughan says this undermines the administration’s claim that pursuing criminal cases is its top priority. This was the primary argument that DHS secretary Janet Napolitano put forward in June 2012, when she issued a directive instructing ICE officers to refrain from initiating deportation proceedings for illegal immigrants who might qualify for “DREAM status” — immigrants who were brought here illegally, are currently enrolled in school or the military, and have not been convicted of a serious crime. “They have been justifying policies by saying it enables them to focus more on criminals,” Vaughan says. “What’s happening is actually the opposite. The majority of resources are going toward supporting Border Patrol activity.”

      Internal e-mails uncovered earlier this year show that ICE officials, concerned about the falling numbers of criminal deportations, have directed agents to come up with methods to reverse that trend. “The only performance measure that will count this fiscal year is the criminal-alien removal target,” former assistant director of ICE field operations David Venturella wrote in an e-mail in April 2012 to agents in Atlanta. However, Vaughan said she could find no discernable uptick in criminal deportations that might have resulted from this new emphasis.

      Chris Crane, who heads the union representing more than 7,000 ICE agents and officers, tells NRO that he has long been baffled by the administration’s claims of record deportation numbers. “We just don’t see it in our offices,” he says. “Every year we supposedly break the record for deportation, and we can’t figure out what’s going on. We don’t believe these numbers.” Administration officials claim to have deported 409,849 immigrants in fiscal year 2012, up from 392,000 in 2010. Crane argues that stats are being cooked to create a false impression of President Obama’s record on immigration enforcement.

      “DHS and ICE are knowingly manipulating arrest and deportation data with the specific intent of misleading the American public with regard to the enforcement of illegal immigration in our country,” he told reporters Thursday at a Capitol Hill press conference. “At an alarming rate, ICE arrest and deportation numbers have plummeted since 2008, clear evidence that interior enforcement has in large part been shut down over the last four years.”

      Administration lawyers did not extensively challenge Vaughan’s court testimony, other than to introduce a bar graph, based on ICE statistics, showing that convicted criminals accounted for 55 percent of all deportations in fiscal year 2012. That figure is misleadingly high, Vaughan stresses, because it includes a large number of Border Patrol removals referred to ICE. In some cases that transfer process may have led to double counting, further inflating the total number of removals, she says.

      The Senate Gang of Eight has finally produced a bill that would grant immediate legal status to illegal immigrants, in exchange for a plan from DHS to further secure the border and enforce the law. Vaughan is skeptical that it will work, given the administration’s current record of enforcement and its willingness to manipulate its own statistics. “It seems to me foolhardy for Congress to trust that this administration is actually going to implement any new enforcement plans,” she says.

      — Andrew Stiles is a political reporter for National Review Online.

    4. Alex Linder Says:

      nigs whip out AKs to speed up getting they yardbird on

    5. Alex Linder Says:

      Listen to The Heretics’ Hour

      The Heretics’ Hour, Live, Monday, April 22, 9-11 pm Eastern time (6-8 Pacific) on The White Network, “Comparing the German and Japanese Surrender to the Allies”

      Carolyn will look at some practical questions raised about these historic events, including “Why didn’t Hitler address the German nation before his suicide,” “Why was Hirohito allowed to live and continue his reign,” and some deeper questions, such as “What does it mean to lose.”

      Pictured right: FM Wilhelm Keitel, Chief of Army (center) with Chief of the Luftwaffe Stumpff (left), Admiral Friedeberg of the Kriegsmarine (right) at surrender ceremony, May 8 in Berlin-Karlhorst.

      If time permits, in the 2nd hour, the 100th anniversary of the rape/murder of “little Mary Phagan” by the Jew Leo Frank on April 26, 1913 will be noted. This event sparked the decision in the Jewish community to form a U.S. organization solely committed to defending Jews accused of crimes – resulting in the Anti-Defamation League.

      See you then,

      Carolyn Yeager


    6. Virgil Says:

      Up in the deranged dominion, the government prefers to focus on harassing anti-diversity dissidents while allowing 250,000 legal invaders plus 140,000 student and work visas plus several thousands “refugees” a year. For the last 14 years, I have predicted that the Muslims would eventually blow up a train or subway. http://www.sunnewsnetwork.ca/sunnews/canada/archives/2013/04/20130422-151451.html

    7. Alex Linder Says:

      [paul fromm]

      Farida Deen and Me: — A Good Example: Anti-Racism is Anti-White

      Yesterday, unsolicited, I received this rambling vomit of hate from someone who calls herself Farida Deen. I don’t know this person, although she claims to have heard me speak. She may well be referring to a You Tube of some of my talks.

      Her rant speaks for itself and I don’t propose to refute her many lies and misconceptions. It’s fascinating, though, how anti-racism is really anti-White. She welcomes what she sees as the coming victory and dominance of non-Whites: “Do you not know it is God’s plan that the world be Asian and Black? These people have a spirituality and humbleness that God appreciates, more importantly they obey the command.”

      In some ways, she echoes the horrific twisted and now dead Susan Sontag’s: “The White race is the cancer of history.” Farida proclaims: “Paul, do you know that white people are the pitbulls of our society? The most dangerous form of human on the planet.They are cold and calculating. It is for this reason that God is wiping them out.” Watch how the anti-hate forces are often most filled with hate themselves.

      I’ll correct her on just one of her many errors. She says, presumably by way of refuting and European objecting to the ethnic replacement of the European founding/settler of North America by government-planned and enabled Third World invasion: “You seem to forget that this land had people on it before your people. And now, look how it feels, to be over run, by people who are not like you.” Almost every contentious Third World immigrant, just after they learn how to ask the address of the welfare office, seems to learn this debate stopper: “You have no right to criticize immigration. You aren’t an Indian and the Indians were here first.”

      Well, that’s debatable. Recent archeological evidence – Kennewick Man (10,000 years ago) and Solutrean Man (perhaps, 20,000 years ago) — proves Europeans were here at the same time and perhaps even earlier than the so-called First Nations. Anyway, they were not homogeneous but constantly warring and seeking to seize each other’s territory. No land by rights belongs to any people. If you don’t secure it and hold it, you lose it. The Indians lost North Americans to the Europeans and we, in turn, shall lose it to Third Worlders, if we don’t secure our borders.

      Paul Fromm



      You are a soldier of the Anti Christ

      Farida Deen

      April 21(1 day ago)

      Paul. I certainly hope that you are not a Christian. Otherwise you would be a hyprocite.

      It must worry you to know that when you become senile and have dementia that a black nurse will have to feed and bathe you.

      Paul, do you know that white people are the pitbulls of our society? The most dangerous form of human on the planet. They are cold and calculating. It is for this reason that God is wiping them out. For centuries, they killed one another, then God sent them the plague, now cancer, and aids, and worst : Contraception.

      Your white women, cut their hair and walk, talk, and dress like men. Your rate of abortion of ridiculous. White women single handedly destroyed the white race in 2 generations of working and having no children. Why is the white race increasingly infertile?

      God. Paul. Do you not know it is God’s plan that the world be Asian and Black? These people have a spirituality and humbleness that God appreciates, more importantly they obey the command, ‘Go forth and multiply’. God’s plan is one world, where we can all go freely to study, work, play, eat, rent, buy, and live. God is furious that the white man tried to own the world without his permission, and murdered billions trying to do so.

      When did the white man apply for a VISA to enter Africa, China, or India? They actually walked right into cultures of 6000 years in existence, so blatant, so rude, so cruel, what audacity, and they were actually terrying, and scary, and everyone’s freedom was taken. How can a culture be that rude? What are white people doing in other parts of the world Paul? What are they doing in South Africa? Wouldn’t you love to see every black man hack every white man in South Africa? based on your theories of ‘who’s country is this’? Do you any idea how many people in the world would rejoice if they saw that happen, the world is waiting for revenge Paul. But God, is the ultimate avenger. He kills your people slowly, with dementia, cancer, parkinson’s, infertility… at alarming rates. I am certain that at your age, and from the way you speak, you have a health related issue by now. God will bring you down, so deep into physical pain and misery in your sickness, that you will absolutely become humble, and have a change of heart, and beg your immigrant doctors and nurses to save you.

      Whites created a vaccine to cause AIDS and the death of billions of Africans. God is furious.

      In the 40’s the whites saved a few million Jews, but dropped a bomb on 60 million japanese. God is furious with white people Paul.

      Trudeau, like Jesus, was a worldly genius, who travelled the world, came to realize how cold the white man was, and he opened up immigration specifically because he knew the population was declining in Canada. BUT the white people were evil to the immigrants and paid them cheap, so they remained poor and bitter, the American dream died and they started to revolt, with crime. Mimimun wagers do not pay enough tax to save this country. You mention that immigrants are a drain to the economy. If immigrants are 50% of the workforce, and purchases, then that cannot be true. BUT, if they are constantly paid less by white people, they cannot fill up the tax needs that were planned. The government does right, the white corporate world does wrong to the immigrant. Like Jesus, Trudeau was also not understood by a majority of white people, they were not at his level, intellectually and spiritually. You don’t have an ounce of spirituality Paul, which leads me to believe you are a demon.

      How I have become strong in my stance. I know God’s plan was never a systemic government, divided by borders, but one FREE world. God always wins, this plan will become full blown in a few hundred years, we have seen uprisings of people vs government in the last three years alone. The white man created nothing but a members only world for himself. I cannot tell you how much that infuriates him. America specifically is the future of the world, a melting pot, that is planned by God. God figures, ‘if everyone creates mixed kids, then the future kids will find it impossible to be racist’. The kids of the future are nothing like you Paul.

      I have listened to you speak, you are no where near Trudeau’s level of genius. You are not intelligent at all. I can tell you for a fact, every genius I have ever met, was a non racist. As a matter of fact, I have been able to prove that every racist lacks a significant amount of intellect.

      Whites are dangerous. They make bullet and bombs and endless contraception. Our country is drained by national defence tactics, the feeding of millions of soldiers, testing of planes, bombs, training, etc… We are drained by the white man’s quest for death and destruction and powers. Isn’t that what you want Paul? Power? To be mayor? No one can understand your stupid rants, you sound like an idiot at the podium, rambling with no proof. Do you realize that educated societies do not listen to idiots? Why would you even run in a large census where immigrants are majority. So dumb.

      When you get cancer, I hope that a Mexican holds the cure. That is how God messes with you. I am certain an immigrant will find the cure for cancer, so that millions of whites will start to show respect. Why should any living thing be considered illegal? That is directly against God. What you really mean, is that they did not apply for ‘MEMBERSHIP’. A serious violation to God’s code. How dare you believe that humans need to have a MEMBERSHIP to any land created by God. This is why God will abolish your SYSTEMS. You’ve put a system on the land, which creates pain and suffering. You made the possibility of heaven on earth impossible, you’ve created a block to heaven on earth, trust me, God will have to abolish that system, if you do not include EVERYONE without judgement. Who the heck are you to JUDGE? Do you understand that your systems create a blasphemy? It’s downright blasphemy.

      While immigrants may make a city poor, whites will destroy the world. God can see this and he is doing everything in his power to remove all of your power. Did you not know that the white man is a TERROR on our planet. Are you that out to lunch. How can you run for Mayor in a city full of immigrants. This proves you are not too bright.

      I am finding it hard to wish you well, once I think of you as a demon, my prayer is for Jesus to cast you out. We may love and pray for our enemies, but Jesus cast out demons. We don’t want anti humans and anti Christs amongst us. Please go back to your country. This is not your country, your people stole it. If your people never applied for VISAS , then what are they doing here? No one has that right.

      You seem to forget that this land had people on it before your people. And now, look how it feels, to be over run, by people who are not like you. Karma, is a bitch. You will one day beg an immigrant for a cure to your cancer. That is my. wish for you. If you ever change, I’d like to know, otherwise I will continue to lose my faith in mankind, especially the white man.

    8. Alfred Smith Says:

      No chicken wings given to the Negroes after they ordered them.

      I am truly surprised that this Negro couple did not rape and murder 50% of the employees in that fast food store.

      A negro without chicken, is like a drug addict with his heroin.

    9. Alex Linder Says:

      Nazi hunter chides Israel over anti-Semitism confab invites

      Hungary, Lithuania, Greece and Ireland ‘are part of the problem and not part of the solution’ and should not be allowed in, says Efraim Zuroff

      By Raphael Ahren April 22, 2013, 9:08 pm 2

      A leading Israeli Nazi hunter scolded the Foreign Ministry this week for extending invitations for an anti-Semitism conference to representatives of four European countries, which, he says, “are part of the problem and not part of the solution” when it comes to anti-Jewish and anti-Israeli bigotry.

      Efraim Zuroff, the director of the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Israel office, said senior government officials from Lithuania, Greece, Hungary and Ireland should not be allowed to attend — and speak at — the Foreign Ministry’s 4th International Conference of the Global Forum for Combating Anti-Semitism, which is scheduled to take place later this month in Jerusalem.

      “The opportunity to address the conference by visiting dignitaries should be a prize given to people who are leading the fight against anti-Semitism, and not to individuals representing countries in which the problem is among the worst in Europe, if not the worst,” Zuroff said.

      The officials from the four countries are scheduled to deliver welcoming addresses at the conference. Yet according to Zuroff, these countries are likely to abuse the stage to downplay their problematic histories and justify their government’s current controversial positions.

      “I don’t think it is a wise idea to give representatives of those countries a platform to try to whitewash the sins of the past, which will only pave the way for worse sins in the future,” Zuroff told The Times of Israel on Sunday.

      Lithuanian Vice Foreign Minister Neris Germanas should not have been invited because of his country’s support for the Prague Declaration, which states that “both the Nazi and Communist totalitarian regimes … should be considered to be the main disasters, which blighted the 20th century,” and other policies promoting anti-Semitism, according to Zuroff.

      The Nazi hunter also objected to the presence of the Greek deputy minister of Justice, Transparency and Human Rights, Konstantinos Karagounis, due to Athens’ inaction regarding the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn party. Hungarian Secretary of State Bence Retvari should not be welcome at the conference because Budapest is doing too little to fight the anti-Semitic Jobbik party, Zuroff said. Alan Shatter, Dublin’s minister forJustice, Equality and Defense, who is Jewish, “is personally not part of problem, but Ireland is problematic because of the government’s fierce hostility to Israel,” according to Zuroff.

      “If would be one thing if these people were coming to deliver some very significant news about an achievement,” said Zuroff, who sent a letter of complaint about the speakers’ lineup to Deputy Foreign Minister Ze’ev Elkin. “But I find it very hard to believe that the deputy foreign minister of Lithuania is about to say that they are dropping their support for the Prague Declaration, or that the Greek minister is going to announce that Golden Dawn is to be outlawed or that the Hungarian minister is going to announce [that convicted war criminal] Laszlo Csatary is going to be put on trial and that every effort is going to be made to fight Jobbik.”

      Hungary received a grade of “B” — or “practical success” — in Zuroff’s 2013 report on the state of prosecution of Nazi war criminals, while Greece received an “E” for not harboring any known suspects. Lithuania received an “F-2? for its “complete failure” to investigate or prosecute Nazi war criminals. Ireland did not receive a grade.

      The spokesman of the Foreign Ministry, Yigal Palmor, dismissed the criticism, saying all speakers at the conference are very relevant to its subject matter.

      “The point of the conference is to discuss the phenomenon of anti-Semitism not in any abstract manner, but in its realized manifestation and in the concrete efforts of fighting it,” Palmor told The Times of Israel. “As for the assessment of the quality of diplomatic relations with Israel, I believe the Foreign Ministry is a better judge of that. There are many good reasons to hold this Global Forum exactly the way it is. It is regrettable and disappointing that Mr. Zuroff can’t see any of them.”


    10. Virgil Says:

      Uplifting news from what used to be a state within British India: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/24/us-bangladesh-building-idUSBRE93N06P20130424

    11. Virgil Says:

      “Judge Prévost found that there were “exceptional circumstances” in the synagogue’s case, and that a “strict, rigorous and blind application of the bylaw” would create an injustice.” http://news.nationalpost.com/2013/04/24/montreal-hasidic-synagogue/ Every last kike in Canada should be deported to Israel!