27 November, 2013

Joe Lieberman and Judaism

Posted by Socrates in judaism, Socrates, William Pierce, William Pierce Wednesday at 12:48 pm | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce.

[…]

…”Captain Goldstein (a Jew) entered a mosque in Hebron and murdered 29 Muslims who were kneeling in prayer, shooting them in the back with his army assault rifle…There was a huge funeral procession for Goldstein, and the Israeli army provided a guard of honor at his grave. Jewish children wore buttons with the slogan “Dr. Goldstein cured Israel’s ills.”…Today, six years after the massacre, Goldstein’s grave is one of the most popular sites in Israel for religious Jewish tourists, especially those from the United States. Goldstein already has acquired the status of a saint.”

[Article].

For the audio version of this article, go [Here] and scroll down to “Joe Lieberman and Judaism.”


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 01/04/19 Kennedy, Barak, and Revolution 64% similar
  3. 12/24/14 The Essence of Judaism 63% similar
  4. 04/14/14 Massacre vs. Massacre 61% similar
  5. 03/01/17 Kennedy, Barak, and Revolution 60% similar
  6. 12/04/08 The Associated Press Stylebook 51% similar
  7. 8 Responses to “Joe Lieberman and Judaism”

    1. Tim McGreen Says:

      But we really must go beyond Judaism and understand that even those Jews who reject the Torah and the Talmud — the non-religious Jews — are our deadly enemies, although not our deadliest enemies.

      Our deadliest enemies are the traitors among our people. Our deadliest enemies are those of our own people who knowingly and deliberately collaborate with the Jews — who, understanding what the Jews are like and what they are trying to do, nevertheless collaborate with them. Our deadliest enemies are the Gentile political leaders, such as Albert Gore and George Bush, without whose conscious and willing collaboration Jews such as Joseph Lieberman could pose no threat at all to us.

      I couldn’t have stated it any better myself. If it weren’t for all their Gentile front-men and accomplices the Jews would be nothing. They would have nothing. Their shekels, their central banks, their hate-crime laws, their power……..it would all disappear like a wisp of smoke.

    2. fd Says:

      Jew collaboration started with Jew merchants getting out in front of the Roman armies as they invaded central Europe (German territory). Caesar used Jews in his armies. So the Jews followed the Germans to America. But you’re correct Tim. It’s all about greed and White race traitors. Christians are under the spell of Sirens.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      The Romans were smart enough not to let the Jews take control of their society the way we have allowed them to take control of ours. Jews were allowed to do the “dirty work”, like picking up prisoners and enemy villagers from the battlefields and selling them as slaves. But if the Jews ever got out of line the Romans wouldn’t have thought twice about crucifying them. That’s why the Jews had respect for the Romans but have no respect for us.

    4. CW-2 Says:

      Most of the churches are also harboring high-level traitors. All of them hellbent on advancing the jew World Order.

    5. Antagonistes Says:

      The French did the same thing, with the Indians, here in America.

      But I think the French were really not in a position to tell the Injuns, “Hey, you red niggers, we might be at war with the English, but you will not skin them alive like that!” (-Alors, vos merdes rouges, nous avons vaincu les Anglais, mais vous ne les torturerez pas! Nous sommes tous les gens blancs!-)

      But in my opinion, White soldiers, of whatever era, have no excuse for letting alien races treat their fellow Whites, although they are adversaries, in a brutal manner.

      But, sadly, it seems to be commonplace.

      Sad.

    6. fd Says:

      No White country has clean hands. It’s a vicious circle

      When Haiti Negroes rose up against the French, English ships anchored offshore supplied the Negroes with guns to kill the French. Further down the road, the French brought Negroes into the Rhineland after WW1. The South is guilty of not letting go of slavery soon enough while the North is guilty of financing the slave trade once they hit the beaches of Rhode Island and Boston in the 16 and 1700s. The Federal army had 7 Jewish generals and 21 Jewish colonels during the 4 years war. And don’t foget about the magnificent ultra modern Negro army unleashed on this continent by the Black Republican administration. The Dutch and the Portuguese managed the charter boats that transferred the Negro slaves to the Americas. So we have a hybrid Negro president at the Federal Capital.

    7. Tim McGreen Says:

      The Confederacy wasn’t Jew-wise. They tried to do business with the House of Rothschild in Europe but the Union Navy blockaded all the Southern ports. Then of course there was Judah Benjamin, the CSA’s Secretary of War. But he seemed OK as far as Jews are concerned. The original Klan of the Reconstruction era wasn’t interested in the Jew thing, either. The reconstituted Klan of the 1920s was Jew-wise but not nearly enough.

    8. fd Says:

      Yes, but the Federal army marshaled into service 7,000 Jews that were thrown against the South. As for the Klan, it defeated Reconstruction and save the South from the extermination of its culture–fed and protected the widows and children from Yankee Negro occupation. So far as the Jews go, the North was covered with Jews. By 1880, the Jews had control of the Northern economy.

      The eight Seligman operating out of New York, under wrote U.S. bonds and supplied the entire Federal army with blue uniforms.

      The 1920s Klan was organized after the killing of Mary Phagan. The first Klavern was appropriately named The Knights of Mary Phagan