20 November, 2013

Nothing is Local Anymore: Federal Cops Investigate Spray-Painted Slur in Massachusetts

Posted by Socrates in 'hate', 'hate' crimes, federal authority vs. local authority, federal government, federal laws, federal power, race, Socrates at 6:41 pm | Permanent Link

Why would the FBI get involved with this case? Massachusetts cops can’t investigate in their own territory? Is everything now a federal matter?

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 02/25/19 Transsexual Baloney to be Taught in UK Schools; Opting Out is Forbidden 63% similar
  3. 11/14/19 Local? No More. The Federalization of Everything in America 63% similar
  4. 04/12/14 NWO Fight: Nevada Rancher vs. Federal Government 54% similar
  5. 12/16/13 Local Sheriffs Not Playing Ball with the NWO/JWO 51% similar
  6. 04/04/17 Video From Sweden: One Man vs. Three Half-Cops, or, the Consequences of Feminism in the West 51% similar
  7. 6 Responses to “Nothing is Local Anymore: Federal Cops Investigate Spray-Painted Slur in Massachusetts”

    1. fd Says:

      Federals agents don’t like state lines. We’re a single democracy. State capitals are federal outpost. You can’t say the ‘N’ word in Federaland.

    2. Tim McGreen Says:

      No doubt this colored boy is “proud” of his Black ancestry and disparages his White side. After all, the Jews train them to think like that. But all that Black pride gets tossed away whenever there’s a White blonde girl whose womb needs to be polluted, right, HALF-CASTE?

    3. archer Says:

      It’s a sin for a white to breed with other races, the children are the real losers in the bi-racial mating game. Why would any white woman deny her children the right to be born white, I would think the child will foster a lot of resentment towards their parents for that.

    4. Tim McGreen Says:

      A “slur-r-r-r–r-r”….one of the Jewsmedia’s favorite words to use. I guess slur-r-r-r-r-s only apply to certain protected groups like homos and coloreds, not to Whites or heterosexuals. No, those last two groups can be ridiculed all day long without fear of attracting unwanted attention from the press or the Feds.

    5. Mary O Says:

      The draconian penalties for “racial harassment” are intended to prevent Whites from lower socio-economic backgrounds from obtaining all-White apartment buildings or mostly White neighborhoods merely by using verbal abuse and minor threats. Had the government not instituted “hate crime” legislation, we would actually have seen lower-income and less educated Whites living in better neighborhoods than the middle-class Whites.

    6. Tim McGreen Says:

      You’re absolutely right, Mary O. All this “hate crime” hysteria is really just about minor acts of vandalism and the routine use of name-calling during fights or arguments. What are now “hate crimes” were at one time nothing more than misdemeanors or charges of simple assault. I also seem to remember a time not too long ago when judges told plaintiffs that “the courts have no remedy for hurt feelings”. But now juries must award millions in damages to “victims” of “emotional distress”. So much for the “Constitutional rule of law”.