18 January, 2014

Putin vs. “Western” Leaders

Posted by Socrates in Cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, homosexual themes, homosexuals, jewed culture, jewed media, media, media control, pop culture, Russia, Socrates, Western civilization, Western culture, Who Rules America? at 9:50 pm | Permanent Link

Can you imagine a Western leader publicly saying that homosexuals are a danger to children? Ha! It would never happen. It’s funny how non-Western leaders like Putin – who are supposed to be such liars – tell more truth than leaders of the “free” Western countries. Of course, there’s a reason for that: in the West, egalitarianism, a.k.a. Cultural Marxism, is a powerful, secular religion (a religion whose high priests are Jews in the media and entertainment industries).


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 12/07/19 Say “No” to Liberal Democracy. It’s Destroying the Western World 58% similar
  3. 04/02/19 It’s True: the Western World Has Gone Insane with Muslim Love/White Hate, Part 2 49% similar
  4. 07/31/19 The Attacks on Western Culture Are Subtle But They Reach Into Every Corner of the White World 48% similar
  5. 08/18/20 An Obituary of the Western World 46% similar
  6. 06/07/19 For Newbies: What is Western Culture? Can Negroes and Mexicans Really Become Part of It? 43% similar
  7. 11 Responses to “Putin vs. “Western” Leaders”

    1. Tim McGreen Says:

      Would the homos be happier if the ruthless, warlike Chechens were in charge of the Olympics? Ol’ Bootlip Barry sure is fond of homos, isn’t he?

    2. fd Says:

      Queers are a set aside program. Let them have their own olympics like all the other special people.

    3. Bigduke6 Says:

      Russia has a real man, Putin, as President. And look who we get stuck with “Fairy Barry” and his fag hag wife, Moochele. Our next President will be a real man, once Hillary is elected.

    4. CW-2 Says:

      Putin is walking a politial tightrope. His country is slowly growing stronger and when Russia fully recovers its strength and confidence Putin or his successor will turn round and confront “Western Decadence”.
      But why should even moderate WN give a shit about the Olympics, either summer or winter. The Olympic ‘Games’ are just that, games, invented by globalists and internationalists of both the left and the right for the purpose of getting the sheeple into the mind-set of the ‘global village’. Gawd, I hate that expression!

    5. Nom de Guerre Says:

      According to her highness ms. Hillary, “it takes a village to raise a nigger(s)”. Thats pretty much evident now that White families are being enlisted to take care of the growing number of mulatto brats, pupped by nigger bucks and Snow whores. Sunday the day worship rag had a full page devoted to White families taking in loads of shitty groids. I think it has to be done because state budgets are strained and they want to trim the budget on the backs of Whites. And to think the Colonists went to war against the British, for having to lodge Soldiers in their homes.

    6. Nom de Guerre Says:

      I have my doubts about Russia having thrown off the jew oligarchs yoke, but then Russia has a history of being under the yoke of the slant eyed Mongols, and the kikes directly from 1918.
      But think about the Russians resistance to the red bolsheviks, they at least put up a fight, unsuccesfully. Here in the kwa we’ve allowed the kikes to own us lock, stock, and barrel.

    7. Tim McGreen Says:

      “I have my doubts about Russia having thrown off the jew (sic) oligarchs yoke….”

      Didn’t Putin just pardon that billionaire Jew criminal Mikhail Khordokovsky? No doubt the pardon was granted as a goodwill gesture in advance of the Sochi Winter Olympics, but still. I knew Putin couldn’t be trusted. Russia’s main task at this point should be to produce new generations of Russians. Otherwise Russia will get overrun with Mongols and Mudslums from Central Asia. I guess the White Russians don’t want to start new families for the same reason that many White Americans don’t, viz., a bleak economic future. But it wouldn’t be a bleak future if we wrested control of the economy from the tentacles of Big Jew.

    8. Tim McGreen Says:

      “But think about the Russians resistance to the red bolsheviks,(sic) they at least put up a fight, (albeit) unsuccesfully (sic).”

      Can you imagine the Bolsheviks of 1918-1922 putting up with a bunch of fairies complaining about their lack of “rights”? Their most likely response would have been to send those obnoxious sexual deviants to a psychiatric prison hospital in the Urals, or just have them shot as spies and counter-revolutionaries.

    9. Nom de Guerre Says:

      Putin is puttin’ up with kikes trafficking in Russian women, so that “leave our kids alone” is a pretty hollow threat.

    10. fd Says:

      I don’t trust Putin any further than I can throw him. Russia continues to be a train wreck.

      Czar Nicholas ll was a weak leader. He didn’t understand the situation. I blame him for the slaughter of the whole family. All the bolsheviks did was fill a void. Russia hasn’t had a strong leader since the 19th or 18th century. Catherine the Great had the courage to publicly state that Russia is too Asiatic.

    11. Tim McGreen Says:

      Of course Catherine was German, not Russian. The last good Czar was probably Alexander II and he was assassinated by (mostly) Jewish anarchists in 1881. V.I. Lenin’s older brother, also named Alexander, was executed in 1887 for his part in a conspiracy to assassinate Czar Alexander III.