25 April, 2014

Who is Hostile?

Posted by Socrates in Crimea, NATO, Russia, Russophobia, Socrates, Ukraine at 9:06 pm | Permanent Link

The West (i.e., NATO) is encircling Russia, yet Russia is called a “hostile power” because it seized a tiny country full of Russians (i.e., Crimea, which is majority-Russian by population)? Funny!

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 02/11/15 The West Is Lining Up Against Putin, War With Russia Over Ukraine Is Possible 64% similar
  3. 07/30/12 ‘Hostile Living Environment’ 54% similar
  4. 06/06/15 Negroes, Then and Now, or, Who Gave Blackie His Hostile, Aggressive Attitude? 54% similar
  5. 06/06/17 The International Noose Tightens: Montenegro Joins NATO 50% similar
  6. 09/01/14 A War in Europe? Not If We Abandon the Sickness of Globalism and Tikkun Olam 46% similar
  7. 12 Responses to “Who is Hostile?”

    1. Nom de Guerre Says:

      http://rahowadirectory.com/sacreativity/if-you-cant-hear-the-drums-of-war/
      Here is the take from the supreme liar Kissinger, a ton of kosher krapola from that pompous liver lipped kikester who couldn’t have hit the broad side of a mosque at point blank range with guided missle.

    2. A. Dwoker Says:

      The current Russian Government has committed the same crime as the German government of the 1930s. They refuse to follow every order their Jewish overlords give. Therefore, like the Germans before them, the Russians will be portrayed as evil, aggressive trouble-makers by the Jew-run media.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      Why should anyone care what The Guardian has to say about anything? That publication, like England itself, is a pathetic has-been. So go ahead and whine, Mr. Kettle, you’re just an effete old pansy. Russia kicks ass and neither you nor your arrogant western imperialist buddies in Washingcoon can do a thing about it.

    4. Nom de Guerre Says:

      Look out Kettle, I’ve heard the Russian airforce is in the vicinity of the lil shitty kingdom. Bombs away!

    5. CW-2 Says:

      The Guardian jewspaper is totally PC, totally dedicated to multi-culti, and is total bullshit. The only people who read that rag are so called teachers and social workers. It wouldn’t last 5 minutes without jew advertising.

    6. George Lenz Says:

      The issue is that of international law.

      Essentially, Crimea is settled by Crimeans, which is indigenous people of Crimea, consisting of Russian ethnic minority. The Crimeans are ethnically, genetically and anthropologically different from Muscovites and other Russians, as well as from Ukrainians: Crimeans that descended from the Greek settlers of Crimea and mixed with Slavic, Scythian and Russian tribes. The Tatars who reside in Crimea came therein in 13th century with Mongolian invaders and committed many heinous crimes against Crimeans: murder, torture, rape, enslavement of Crimean men and women. The historical record of Tatar crimes is kept in Greek Orthodox Churches in Cyprus and Greece.

      If Russia protected the referendum on self-determination of the Crimean people and acknowledged the republic of Crimea as the separate free, sovereign and independent Crimean state, few countries would have protested, as this is natural in accordance with the sacred and inalienable right of self-determination of peoples. The sons and daughters of Javan, son of Noah, the common ancestor of Greek-related peoples live in free, sovereign and independent separate states in their isles and peninsulas everywhere in the world, and everyone is comfortable with that. In such a situation with Abkhazia and Southern Ossetia only 42 countries protested.

      Yet Russian dictatorship did something different: annexed the part of the existing Ukrainian state, for which the sacred and inalienable right to self-determination of peoples does not serve. The sacred and inalienable right to self-determination of peoples exists to establish autonomous and self-governing regions within existing state or establish new states, seceding from existing estates, and not to annexation of parts of existing state by other states. Historically annexations often led to bloody and prolonged wars, that is why the actions of the Russian dictatorship are condemned by the majority of states.

      There are also questions with the regard to electoral fraud and violation of voting procedures, although not to the degree affecting the results of the referendum on self-determination of the Crimean people. as well as the fact that many Crimeans voted for secession of Crimea from Ukraine, rather than annexation of Crimea by the Russian federation. Therefore, the results of the Crimean referendum with regard to self-determination of the Crimean people pertaining to secession of the republic of Crimea, inclusive of the city of Sevastopol, from Ukraine are irreversible and the new free, sovereign and independent state, the republic of Crimea, inclusive of the city of Sevastopol was formed. Yet annexation of Crimea by the Russian federation will not be recognized, unless within 7 years another referendum is held in Crimea and Sevastopol, giving Crimean clear choice between establishing their own free, sovereign and independent Crimean state, inclusive of the city of Sevastopol, and becoming a part of the Russian federation.

    7. Vive_Caucasia Says:

      Shut your fucking mouth lenz/fdwaith, you pollack-kike troll. You’d gladly bend over to Big Jew because you think it would somehow harm Russia.

    8. Tim McGreen Says:

      Well said, Vive, that Lenz guy must some kind of FOXJews Kosher Kahnservative. I wonder what he thinks about Arab Palestine being under illegal Zionist occupation?

    9. George Lenz Says:

      Hard is the truth, and few shall bear it.

      As ancient Romans said Veritas superabit, that is the truth will turn into beasts and subsequently slay all those who oppose the truth

    10. Tim McGreen Says:

      “Dum inter homines sumus, colamus humanitatem” – Seneca

      Except, perhaps, when dealing with the likes of Mr. Lenz.

    11. fd Says:

      What about this old Texas axiom:

      Never mud wrestle with a pig. You both get up dirty and the pig likes it.

    12. Vive_Caucasia Says:

      Good points by fd and Tim. To answer Tim’s question, I’m pretty sure the response would be a mix of the Anti-Defamation League’s talking points along with Rapture Bunny rhetoric when discussing Palestine or any other issue. One standard for the chosen, another for the goyim.

      Actually I’ll take a moment to augment the statements above:

      Tim – Goyim don’t measure up to the “homines” in that excellent quote, and it would be waging war on nature and the natural order to refer to christian-zionist jew-warriors like lenz as people.

      fd – Good advice, but I respect pigs too much to elevate any Christian-Zionist Kahn-servile to equality on the same level as pigs. That seems like a form of Bolshevism to me because it is abundantly clear that the pig is infinitely smarter and more noble than the self-righteous scum who wage war against the enemies of the Jews and delude themselves that they are doing “God’s work”. Pigs may live in filth, but they are nowhere near as repulsive as these types.

      But you gentlemen are intelligent enough to know all of that, I just want to let off some steam and make a note for any of the uninitiated who may be browsing these pages.