6 June, 2014

Behind Every Black or Mexican Leader, There’s a Jew, Propping Him Up

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", black leaders, Cesar Chavez, jewed culture, jewed politics, mestizos, Mexican heroes, Mexican leaders, Socrates at 3:46 pm | Permanent Link

Jewish radical Saul Alinsky trained the Mexican labor/civil-rights activist Cesar Chavez. Furthermore, Jews provided critical funding for the California-based Community Service Organization (CSO), a group which Chavez worked for and was later president of.


  • 6 Responses to “Behind Every Black or Mexican Leader, There’s a Jew, Propping Him Up”

    1. Tim McGreen Says:

      That was a well-written and well-reasoned article. But since it was written by a right-wing Wall Street Jew he has to, naturally, promote globalism, deregulation, unlimited Mud immigration and other such “free market” bullshit which ultimately benefits only Big Business and Big Jew.

    2. fd Says:

      Why write an extravagant text about a person who was not extravagant. It’s an inverted essay complete with the very Jewish word ‘hosannahs.’ Had the subject been a Jew, the hosannahs would have been non-stop. Hitler highlighted the fact Jews are all about excessive praise, i.e., hosannahs, when praising their kind.

      I have nothing against free market. Tariff revenue is heavy tax that goes to big government. Why should I pay 3 prices for an inferior product ro people who have no allegiance to me when I can purchase a superior product at a cheaper price.

    3. Tim McGreen Says:

      fd, you’re not saying that the Chinks make a superior product, are you? I mean, they’re good at making AK-47s, silkworm missiles and T-62 tanks, but chink-manufactured baby cribs and alarm clocks are even more dangerous.

    4. fd Says:

      The Chinese make junk. I’m just saying that if I can buy a quality product from say Holland that is cheaper than an inferior product coming out of New England. I prefer to trade with Holland. Placing Tariffs on a product that would force me to buy from a company that wants to rip me off is racketeering.

    5. Tim McGreen Says:

      Interesting you should bring up New England, fd. They used to have manufactories and textile mills all over that region, making everything from torpedoes to lady’s shoes. A lot of child labor and sweatshop labor was used, with most of the workers being White children and young White women. Their working conditions for the most part were bad, even by 19th century standards, yet we never heard any Northeastern Liberal Establishment types demanding better treatment and pay for those exploited people. But those same Liberals professed to care a great deal about the poor Negro slaves down South, who were lazy, shiftless slugs when compared to the hardworking but unappreciated Whites of the North.

      After WWI a lot of those Northeastern factories and mills began to shut down and move to the South because it was cheaper to do business down there. As a result many New England industrial towns, like Fall River, Manchester and Lowell, never economically recovered. A shameful chapter in their past which they are still paying for today.

    6. fd Says:

      Good observation, Tim McGreen. The child labor in the Northeast was terrible. White kids selling newspapers in the streets of New York city in the cold. Children standing on the machinery they operated to reach the levers. During the war, Copperheads called Northern workers slaves without masters.

      The people concerned about Negro freedom had no problem exterminating Indians out west immediately after the war.

      Which ever way the whiskey bottle falls