4 June, 2014

The Soviet Union, 1935? No, America, 2014

Posted by Socrates in "homophobia", America, America-the-sitcom, AmeriKwa, Cultural Marxism, egalitarianism, homosexual themes, homosexuals, private property, Socrates at 12:58 pm | Permanent Link

In Colorado, bakery employees cannot discriminate against homosexuals and, worse, they must be “re-educated” about the proper treatment of queers. Keep in mind, this is a private business which is not run by any government agency. So much for private-property rights.

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 05/21/18 Liberal Seattle: the New Soviet Union 76% similar
  3. 01/22/14 America’s “Civil Rights” Swindle Continues 75% similar
  4. 03/13/18 The Soviet Union, 1935? No, America, 2018 68% similar
  5. 05/04/13 The Soviet Union, 1935? No, Florida, 2013 65% similar
  6. 02/25/13 In the Name of Human Equality, You Should Hire Black/Brown Criminals! 64% similar
  7. 4 Responses to “The Soviet Union, 1935? No, America, 2014”

    1. Tim McGreen Says:

      It would seem that “civil rights” apply only to Blacks and homosexuals. Aha!, I say. That’s unconstitutional, because, as carried out, so-called civil rights don’t protect everyone, only certain favored groups, thus violating the “equal protection” clause that liberals are always claiming is somewhere inside the Constitution. So why not use the Left’s own stupid legal arguments against them, for a change?

      But the problem is that the baker would have to spend years fighting that “Human Rights Commission” in court, and it would cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not more. As a hard working, contributing member of society he couldn’t possibly spare the time or money to do that, and the Social Marxists know it.

      So the bad guys win yet again. Unless the baker simply refuses to submit any quarterly reports to that Commission or refuses to send his employees to any Orwellian mind-control therapy. Let’s see what the Culture Commies do about that.

      How will they enforce their totalitarian doctrine of “tolerance” and “sensitivity training” if the victim won’t submit? Chances are they won’t be able to enforce anything because the public will be on the bakery’s side. The only ones who will protest are the usual mob of professional troublemakers and street-activists whom no one but the left-wing Jewsmedia take seriously.

    2. fd Says:

      The civil rights wars are non-stop against White people across the country. Northern republicans passed forceful civil rights acts in 1866, 1870, 1871, 1875. The civil rights act of 1964 was written under Kennedy’s administration. Mr. Kennedy didn’t live to see in enacted.

      This is where it gets creepy. When Kennedy was running for the White House, he came South to romance the Klan. It was still the solid South–%100 racist democrat. After winning the campaign, Kennedy turned on the Southern country like a rabid dog. He invaded Ole Miss with Federal troops. And his brother, Teddy, who was top law enforcement officer on the Potomac sent freedom riders to the deep South protected by federal agents on every bus. Black/white couples were selected as premier passengers.

      So Kennedy and Johnson destroyed the solid South–their own political party for the price of equality.

    3. fd Says:

      Racist Dunning School at Columbia University: 1900 to 1920s

      “Reconstruction was a battle between two extremes: the Democrats, as the group which included the vast majority of the whites, standing for decent government and racial supremacy, versus the Republicans, the Negroes, alien carpetbaggers, and renegade scalawags, standing for dishonest government and alien ideals. These historians wrote literally in terms of white and black.”[162]

    4. Tim McGreen Says:

      Never trust ANY politician. And that includes Vladimir Putin. Huey Long was one of the last pols I can think of who was worthy of the White Man’s vote, but look at what the secret Jew Franklin Rosenfeld did to him.