16 January, 2016

A Global Army for Global Man (Again)

Posted by Socrates in global government, globalization, internationalism, NATO, New World Order, NWO, Serbia, Socrates, UN at 5:16 pm | Permanent Link

“The paper released calls for a ‘European operational headquarters’ to replace the system of national governments directing their own forces. The draft plan also demands that power over border control, including European coastguard responsibilities, should be handed to the new army.” So much for sovereignty and autonomy. This will be the world’s third global army (after UN and NATO troops). Global police forces don’t work, unless they have sophisticated warplanes like NATO does, but even NATO’s power is limited to how much political arm-twisting America can do. As a world leader, America has less power today than ever before – I don’t think it could carry out another NATO attack such as like on Serbia in 1999 [1].

[Article].
.
[1] the League of Nations, as far as I know, never used any world powers (e.g., Britain) as military enforcers


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 03/29/17 NATO is Planting Flags All Over the World, With Help From Its Attack Dog, the USA, or, Getting NATO’d Twice 79% similar
  3. 01/22/20 On the Vietnam War and Global Leftism as Imperialism of Another Type 79% similar
  4. 08/30/14 NATO Accuses Russia of Violating Ukraine’s Sovereignty 62% similar
  5. 09/08/09 Global Money for Global Man, Again 62% similar
  6. 08/31/13 Syria, America, the UN and Global Government 61% similar
  7. 5 Responses to “A Global Army for Global Man (Again)”

    1. fd Says:

      So the people of America traded monarchial tyranny for federal tyranny. Next stop–global tyranny. What’s the diff?

      The emergence of the Aryan outlaw era could happen at any given time much like the outlaws that spread across the country from 1865 to 1890. Rob the f–kin’ banks and whatever else the quick imagination can pursue. Criminal government; criminal society.

      Bonnie and Clyde and Pretty Boy Floyd were hungry Confederates.

    2. J├╝rgen Says:

      GUERRILLA WARFARE

      The good news is that, as “powerful” as the globalist armies become,
      they still lose, every single time, to freedom-loving people who use guerrilla warfare against them.

      Just look at Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan. In Afghanistan, the U.S. army, with all its technology, can’t even defeat armed shepherds up in the hills. They know this, and it troubles them….as it should.

    3. fd Says:

      Yes, the Federal army has always been too regimented to cope with guerrilla warfare. After the 4 years war, Confederate guerrillas on the border states moved forward to rob banks and fight the railroad.

    4. CW-2 Says:

      The future Ejew army will look good on paper but will they fight. They may string together a motley crew of mulattoes and muslims, but what White man with any shred of self respect will fight for his son to be a fag or his daughter to join the khalif’s harem.

    5. fd Says:

      Off Topic

      Happy MLK Day! Get your nigger huntin’ license 50 cents. Free tee-shirt with purchase:

      https://www.leatherup.com/images/product/large/K_1142978424.jpg;jsessionid=A413104E7638F78B0ACA3C0F2B913236