25 April, 2016

“Reactionary” Thinking is “Strange”? Not at All

Posted by Socrates in 'reactionaries', nationalism, philosophy, Socrates, White identity, White ideology, white nationalism, White philosophy, White solutions, White thought at 2:32 pm | Permanent Link

I propose a new name for nationalism: naturalism. Why? Because it fits perfectly. Thinking and acting racially is completely natural. It’s not “strange” or “motley” or weird or controversial. It’s as normal as breathing or eating. Not thinking racially? Now that’s strange and unnatural.

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 07/17/19 “National Conservatism”: It’s the Latest Jewish Thing 42% similar
  3. 06/26/19 White Philosophy for Newbies: What is Nationalism? 40% similar
  4. 09/01/15 Jews: Always Thinking as Jews 35% similar
  5. 11/06/19 All the Experts Say: Japan Must Commit Suicide-by-Immigration (or, Do As We Say, Not As We Jew!) 33% similar
  6. 05/08/14 Racism: Liberals Not Seeing the Forest, or, Maybe, Not Wanting To 31% similar
  7. 3 Responses to ““Reactionary” Thinking is “Strange”? Not at All”

    1. fd Says:

      Naturalism sounds good. Nationalism reminds me of central despotism.

      Naturalism would not require antique hardcopy compacts overlaid with laws. Naturalism needs only regulations to stay on track.

    2. J├╝rgen Says:

      NATURALISM

      Naturalism is perfect. I’m going to start using it everywhere, in all of my conversations.

      It’s only natural for White girls to be around White boys, for example,
      not around mud races who do not share even the most basic of our values.

    3. Thom McQueen Says:

      It rather sounds like that naked German chick that Tim McGreen is romping about with on the Other Side.