20 December, 2017

The Trump Administration Wants to End the Chain Immigration Law

Posted by Socrates in Celler, Celler Rights Laws, chain immigration law, Hart-Celler Act of 1965, immigration, immigration bills/laws, jewed immigration policy, jewed law, nation-building/nation-wrecking, Socrates, Trump, Trump's policies at 2:16 pm | Permanent Link

(Above: the Jew, Emanuel Celler, a nation-wrecker without peer)

Incredible: 50 years after the Jewish congressman, Emanuel Celler, birthed the 1965 immigration law that produced the horrible “chain immigration” mandate, someone is actually trying to stop it! This is great news. (The scary thing is how successful Celler was in his one-man war against White America: he was successful about 90% of the time; few White politicians had the balls to oppose Celler; they preferred to sell out their own people instead).

[Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 10/01/15 Huh? Ted Kennedy’s Immigration Law? 55% similar
  3. 04/13/09 Illegal Immigrant Accused of Murdering Homecoming Queen 44% similar
  4. 04/18/13 New Immigration Bill S744: Why So Sneaky? 44% similar
  5. 10/31/08 Norbert Schlei Redux 43% similar
  6. 11/16/16 Things for the Donald Trump Administration to Consider from 2017-Onward, Part 2 41% similar
  7. 4 Responses to “The Trump Administration Wants to End the Chain Immigration Law”

    1. jayhackworth Says:

      With the open border insanity in place , there’s no way the USA will not fragment into pieces while under control of the jew demon race.

    2. Luke Says:

      Hot stock tip for all White Nationalists who have a few bucks in the bank:

      Invest in companies that manufacture wood chippers and chainsaws, because I think the tea leaves tell us that those items are going to be put to good use in the very near future.

    3. Zerstorer Says:

      I wonder if this jew bastard had any influence on Australian politicians dismantling “The White Australia Policy”, which was finally removed in 72′.

    4. Chandala Says:

      @Zerstorer – here’s a partial answer to your question – I copy and save lots of stuff, let’s see if I can re-post it here …

      Everyone here should know that it was a Catholic priest who destroyed the “White Australia” policy in 1949.

      How one refugee signaled the end of the White Australia policy
      From theguardian.com – too many links in this comment – you’ll have to google it

      Those influential in ending the “White Australia” policy included Cardinal Daniel Mannix, the Catholic archbishop of Melbourne. He was the one who (out of a sense of pathological altruism?) fought to allow Indonesian Annie O’Keefe to remain in Australia after WWII.

      And here is the man who fought (and lost) to keep Australia WHITE !

      The O’Keefe case – Arthur Calwell
      from a webpage called calwellokeefecase – too many links in this comment – you’ll have to google it

      Arthur Calwell was the federal Minister for Immigration 1945-1949,
      He was the man who resisted allowing the first non-white to remain in Australia.

      AUSTRALIA SHOULD HAVE LISTENED TO THIS MAN !
      From the article:

      If those people who are attacking me on the O’Keefe case are logical and honest and have any elementary sense of decency, they must agree that if I allow Mrs O’Keefe to stay I have perforce to let back into this country those Indonesian husbands of Australian women whom I have already repatriated. I cannot make distinctions between the sexes and between Indonesian men who are Moslems and those who become Christians. The attempt to use the religious argument is indecent… If we allow these people to stay we shall open the flood gates to any Asiatics who want to come here. Honorable members opposite do not stand for a white Australia; they stand for a black Australia. There are, unfortunately, far too many of their type in Australia today who want to break our laws… There is a great peril if we weaken our laws and allow people to enter Australia, where they may establish colonies and can never be assimilated. I have weighed the costs and measured the risks. I know where my duty lies. All of us, and myself in particular, as Minister, have a responsibility, not merely to the present generation, but also to posterity. We have to hand down this country to our children and our children’s children in the same manner as we received it from our fathers and as they received it from their fathers. Our grandfathers and great grandfathers laid the foundations of Australia broad and large, and made it possible for this democracy to exist as it is today. We can have a white Australia, we can have a black Australia, but a mongrel Australia is impossible, and I shall not take the first steps to establish the precedents which will allow the flood gates to be opened. I respect Asiatic people. I do not regard them as inferiors, but they have a different culture and history, different living standards and different religions from our own. They can live, and, I hope, enjoy whatever they can get from the earth’s bounty in their own countries. We can make a success of our democracy here. I challenge those who attack us, and who have the temerity to raise the issue, to have the courage to force the matter to a division, and let us know where we all stand. Let us separate the sheep from the goats.

    Leave a Reply

    You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

    <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>

    Limit your links to three per post or your comment may automatically be put in the spam queue.