26 February, 2019

Pro-White “Hate Speech”? In New Jersey? Really?

Posted by Socrates in 'hate', 'hate' haters, 'hate' laws, free speech, hate speech, Socrates, white nationalism, White thought at 4:57 pm | Permanent Link

“Hate speech” laws are unconstitutional. America’s founders would not have tolerated any type of “hate speech” laws. Neither did New Jersey in 1947 (back when NJ was White):

The New Jersey Constitution of 1947, Article I, paragraph 6:

“Every person may freely speak, write and publish his sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that right. No law shall be passed to restrain or abridge the liberty of speech or of the press.” (“No law” means “no law.” As in, zero laws. Zero. None. Like, as in, none. Not one).

But yet, despite that, we hear this from town leaders in New Jersey today:

“The Bloomfield Police Department is actively investigating this (White nationalist flyers) incident, and takes all forms of hate speech and hate crimes extremely seriously.” [Article].


  1. Similar posts:

  2. 11/05/19 FBI Investigates Un-PC Flyers at Western Connecticut State University. Why? 56% similar
  3. 06/25/17 First, There Were Hate ‘Crimes,’ Now, There Are Hate ‘Incidents’: Congress is Trying to Create Thought-Crime Laws 42% similar
  4. 09/05/18 Hate Crimes? Where?, or, Increasing the Propaganda in the Trump Era 41% similar
  5. 01/18/15 Jewish Professor: Limits on Free Speech Are a Good Thing 41% similar
  6. 06/10/15 Montana’s Unconstitutional Hate-Speech Law 40% similar
  7. One Response to “Pro-White “Hate Speech”? In New Jersey? Really?”

    1. Free Speech Forum Says:

      One thing worse than living in a police state is finding out that no one cares.

    Leave a Reply

    You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

    <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>

    Limit your links to three per post or your comment may automatically be put in the spam queue.