29 June, 2020

The Zany U.S. Supreme Court Rules on an Abortion Law

Posted by Socrates in "liberation" movements led by Jews, abortion, abortion movement, America, American cities, American values and morals, conservatism, conservatives, constitution, constitutional rights, crime, federal laws, feminism, Feminists, jewed culture, jewed law, jewed politics, Socrates, Supreme Court, women, women and 'equality', women in the workforce at 12:17 pm | Permanent Link

This current Court is conservative? Really?? If that’s “conservative,” I’d hate to see “liberal.”


Re: abortion and human-life value in America:

If a man shoots a pregnant woman and kills her, and he is charged federally, he will be charged with two murders: of the woman and of the baby [1]. But, if an abortionist kills a baby, he isn’t charged with any crime. He’s a “hero” who “saved the poor young woman from a life of unhappiness and misery, and now, burden-free, the woman can go out and have a fancy career in some shiny office building in New York City! She’s free! Hooray for abortion rights! Yay!” In fact, let’s sing the feminist theme song from “The Mary Tyler Moore Show!” (1970-1977) [2].

Isn’t it nice to know that America values human life? Yeah.


[1] “The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law which recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence.” — Wikipedia.

[2] Sing it loud!:

“You can have the town, why don’t you take it?
You’re gonna make it after all
How will you make it on your own?
This world is awfully big
And girl this time your all alone
But it’s time you started living
It’s time you let someone else do some giving”

Comments are closed.