28 May, 2021

UNESCO and Race-Science Fraud, 1949-Onward

Posted by Socrates in Ashley Montagu, jewed culture, jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, Leo Pasvolsky, race, race and IQ, race as a social construct, race baloney, Race Denial, race science, racial science, René Cassin, UN, UN founders, UNESCO, Western civilization, Western culture, Western decline at 2:45 pm | Permanent Link

Just after Nazi Germany was defeated by the “allies” in 1945, UNESCO, which is a branch of the UN, began a vigorous program to convince the White world that “race doesn’t exist” [1]. (If you think it was just a coincidence that UNESCO would do that just 4 years after the defeat of Nazi Germany, guess again. It was more like a Cohencidence. It was a clever attempt by the UN to “kill off any last remnants of Nazism that might still exist in the Western world”).

The interesting thing about the UNESCO effort was how obviously ridiculous it was: Jews, leftists (including a Soviet “scientist”) and Brown people, some of them with no science backgrounds, writing endlessly about how White science was, suddenly, totally wrong about race and race differences. (Think of it this way: before WWII, White race science was correct, but after WWII, White race science was a giant fraud! Almost overnight, White race science became fraudulent and just had to be renounced!).

This quote will give you a hint about the ridiculousness of UNESCO on race: “Distinguished poet Dr. Jaime Torres Bodet of Mexico, Julian Huxley’s replacement as director general of UNESCO, spearheaded the task of collecting and disseminating scientific information concerning problems of “race;” a task assigned in an approved resolution confirmed during the Fourth General Conference of UNESCO in Paris, 1949.” Why was a Mexican poet spearheading the collecting of scientific information? He’s not a race expert in any way. Many of the UNESCO “experts” on race were not experts at all.

UNESCO released various “race doesn’t exist” propaganda from 1949 to 1967. It released two major race-denial statements in 1950 and 1951, written or edited mostly by the Jewish “anthropologist,” Ashley Montagu (real name Israel Ehrenberg. He changed his name twice! What a phony man!). Montagu, a godfather of race denial, wrote a book called “Man’s Most Dangerous Myth: The Fallacy of Race” in 1942. He was fired from Rutgers University over the controversy surrounding his 1950 UNESCO race statement.

UNESCO’s “The Race Question in Modern Science” (1956; later edited and re-titled “Race, Science and Society” in 1975) was a collection of pamphlets from 10 “race experts” (plus a Jew introducing the documents). The “experts” included: a Black “political scientist” from Nigeria; a Soviet geneticist who won the Lenin Prize (!); a postmodern poet and writer; a leftist sociologist; an Indian from India; and at least four leftist Jews. Nice panel full of “scientists” there! Poets and sociologists! (The Jews were: Leo Kuper, a sociologist; Claude Levi-Strauss, a “social” and “structural” anthropologist; Otto Klineberg, a psychologist; and Max Gluckman, a “social anthropologist”). This UNESCO “race” panel was a farce. Jews, Soviets, negroes, French leftists, etc. A totally biased group. Yet, Western culture remodeled itself based on their race baloney.

The worst thing about the UNESCO race-denial program is that it made race-denial “legitimate” in the eyes of many people. (In fact, it marked the beginning of a concerted but unofficial anti-racism program throughout the West, e.g., in Hollywood in the 1960s there were lots of Black people appearing on the TV, such as in “I Spy” and “Mission Impossible”).

Here are a few quotes from the 1950 UNESCO race statement [2]. Bold text is mine. (Lots of legitimate scientists complained about this race statement, and for good reason. In fact, Montagu was forced to re-word the statement; interestingly, Montagu was replaced as rapporteur by L.C. Dunn for the revised, 1951 UNESCO race statement; the 1951 statement was created because the 1950 statement was so heavily criticized):

(This quote denies the legitimacy of IQ tests and IQ differences between the races): “Whatever classification the anthropologist makes of man, he never includes mental characteristics as part of those classifications. It is now generally recognized that intelligence tests do not in themselves enable us to differentiate safely between what is due to innate capacity and what is the result of environmental influences, training and education. Wherever it has been possible to make allowances for differences in environmental opportunities, the tests have shown essential similarity in mental characters among all human groups. In short, given similar degrees of cultural opportunity to realize their potentialities, the average achievement of the members of each ethnic group is about the same.”

“…it would be better when speaking of human races to drop the term ‘race’ altogether and speak of ethnic groups.” (Oh, here we go! Muddying the waters about race already and it’s only 1950!).

“The scientific material available to us at present does not justify the conclusion that inherited genetic differences are a major factor in producing the differences between the cultures and cultural achievements of different peoples or groups. It does indicate, however, that the history of the cultural experience which each group has undergone is the major factor in explaining such differences.” (So, it’s not about genetics and biology, no, no, it’s all about culture!).

“The biological fact of race and the myth of ‘race’ should be distinguished. For all practical social purposes “race’ is not so much a biological phenomenon as a social myth. The myth of ‘race’ has created an enormous amount of human and social damage. In recent years it has taken a heavy toll in human lives and caused untold suffering. It still prevents the normal development of millions of human beings and deprives civilization of the effective co-operation of productive minds. The biological differences between ethnic groups should be disregarded from the standpoint of social acceptance and social action. The unity of mankind from both the biological and social viewpoints is the main thing. To recognize this and to act accordingly is the first requirement of modern man.” (Here we go! Race is mostly a myth! Mankind must be viewed as one big unified group of people! The denial of race and creed! Mankind as one group, one unit, with one destiny! In other words, Marxism) [3].

Bottom line: for 20 years, Jews and leftists used UNESCO to try to convince the White Western world (and only the White Western world; they didn’t care about racial opinions in the Eastern or Black worlds) that “race doesn’t exist.” Did they succeed? Largely, yes. There is little White racism in the West today.


[1] UNESCO = United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. It was co-founded by a Jew, Rene Cassin. The UN itself was created by a Jew, Leo Pasvolsky. There was an earlier version of UNESCO, founded in Geneva in 1922 under the League of Nations banner, called “The International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation” and it was headed by a Jew, Henri Bergson. An off-shoot of that group, called “International Institute of Intellectual Cooperation,” founded in Paris in 1925, was headed by a half-Jew, Julien Luchaire, and co-headed by a Jew, Alfred Zimmern, from 1926 to 1930.

[2] the 1950 and 1951 UNESCO race statements [Here].

[3] “In the name of science and of man it (Marxism) seeks to transcend the specific divisions of climate, race and creed, of nation-state and language-group, in order to chart a common future for mankind.” — Jewish/Marxist scholar Eugene Kamenka (1928-1994).

  1. Similar posts:

  2. 11/11/14 Once Again, the Jews Are Denying That Race Exists 98% similar
  3. 03/01/08 “DNA, Schmee-NA! The Genetic History Of The Jews” 72% similar
  4. 09/02/19 Human Pre-History and the Making of the Races, Part 1 70% similar
  5. 08/03/07 “The EU and the Globalist Alliance” 67% similar
  6. 08/11/21 Scientists Are Afraid of Racial Things. But Why? Race is Part of Science 64% similar
  7. Comments are closed.