23 October, 2009
Thought-Crime Bill Passes Senate, Now Ready to Become Law
Posted by Socrates in 'hate', 'hate' crimes, 'hate' laws, General Decline, homosexual themes, homosexuals, jewed culture, jewed law, jewed politics, Obama, Socrates, Soviet Union, thought crime at 11:57 am | 
Permanent Link
A proposed law that punishes a person for what he was thinking if/when he committed a crime against a homosexual has passed both branches of Congress and now awaits Obama’s signature [1]. “Hate-crime” laws originally came from the Jewish-built Soviet Union – in fact, the first “hate-crime” law of the 20th century came from the Soviets; that law protected Jews and the penalty for violating that law was death [2].
[1] if Obama isn’t a natural-born U.S. citizen, this law will be legally void
[2] that Soviet decree/law outlawed pogroms against Jews and the pogromists themselves. It was issued on July 27, 1918
23 October, 2009 at 6:09 pm
The standard gay response to any criticism, and wearing conservative clothes twenty feet away can be considered criticism in San Francisco, is to grab the straight persons ass and sneer. The Jews know this and this law is 100% intentional on their part to harass and attack ANYBODY that looks too NON Jewish. You wear a cross around your neck or your girlfriend does and guess what? They are fully willing to harass you by grabbing you in the Bay Area. Because they are protected by the police there.
Now with this law they have federal protection anywhere. You go to Jackson Hole Wyoming and a gay man wants some fun at your expense he can attack you – doesn’t leave a mark – and if you punch him you get to face a felony crime sentence. Nice huh?
The reason Fairfax high in Los Angeles in the Fairfax Jewish district elected a gay man to home coming queen is not because the young Jewish women don’t want to be queen… it’s because the ENTIRE Jewish community is in on the gag. They KNOW that both of their traditional enemies have made a lot more of control of sexual expression then the Jewish religion has. The Christians and the Muslims are going to be punished for their fidelity and chastity… This is how the control from the late night talk shows and Los Angeles Times and New York Times editorial pages makes it to Yellowstone national park.
Mel Gibson, assuming he wasn’t a stooge to then have his apology tour on talk shows, illustrates the social control on famous people. Well this is going to be grass roots social control. The gays might as well work for the Jews. They are the Jews stooges if they aren’t Jewish themselves and it is open season on non Jew’s asses from now on.
It is all intentional. Live in San Francisco and find out. Well my mistake… San Francisco is going to be coming to you soon.
24 October, 2009 at 5:15 am
Under the Soviet decree/law any criticism of jews was punished with death. The jews made it illegal for Russians or anyone else to tell the truth about them. This is going to happen in America now as well.
24 October, 2009 at 6:37 am
Thoughtcrime
In the dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell, the government attempts to control not only the speech and actions, but also the thoughts of its subjects, labeling disapproved thoughts with the term thoughtcrime or, in Newspeak, “crimethink”.[1]
In the book, Winston Smith, the main character, writes in his diary: “Thoughtcrime does not entail death: thoughtcrime is death.”
Contents
• 1 Thought Police
• 2 Technology and thoughtcrime
• 3 See also
• 4 References
• 5 Further reading
• 6 External links
[edit] Thought Police
Main article: Thought Police
The Thought Police (thinkpol in Newspeak) are the secret police of the novel Nineteen Eighty-Four whose job it is to uncover and punish thoughtcrime. The Thought Police use psychology and omnipresent surveillance to find and eliminate members of society who are capable of the mere thought of challenging ruling authority.[2]
The Thought Police of Orwell and their pursuit of thoughtcrime were based on the methods used by the totalitarian states and competing ideologies of the 20th century. It also had much to do with, as Orwell called it, the “power of facing unpleasant facts,” and his willingness to criticize prevailing ideas which brought him into conflict with others and their “smelly little orthodoxies.” Although Orwell described himself as a democratic socialist, many other socialists (especially those who supported the communist branch of socialism) thought that his criticism of the Soviet Union under Stalin damaged the socialist cause.
The term “Thought Police,” by extension, has come to refer to real or perceived enforcement of ideological correctness in any modern or historical contexts.
[edit] Technology and thoughtcrime
Technology played a significant part in the detection of thoughtcrime in Nineteen Eighty-Four — with the ubiquitous telescreens which could inform the government, misinform and monitor the population.
[edit] See also
• Censorship
• Free will
• Freedom of thought
• Gatekeeping (communication)
• Hate crime
• Hate speech
• Laws against Holocaust denial
• Institutional knowledge
• Intrusive thoughts
• Language and thought
• Ostracism
• Political correctness
• Thoughtcrimes, a 2003 film
• Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007
[edit] References
1. ^ Orwell, George; The Orwell Reader: Fiction, Essays, and Reportage; pg. 409; 1956: Harcourt, Brace; ISBN 0156701766 9780156701761
2. ^ McCormick, Donald; Approaching 1984, p. 21, 1980, ISBN 0715376543, 9780715376546
[edit] Further reading
• Kretzmer, David and Kershman, Hazan Francine (Eds.) (2000) “Freedom of Speech and Incitement Against Democracy”. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, Netherlands. ISBN 90-411-1341-X
[edit] External links
• Cunningham & Cunningham, Inc. “Thought Crime”.
• The Essayist, “Hate Crime Premise” July 24, 1998.
• Evenson, Brad, “Looking for thoughtcrime to crimestop”. National Post, February 08, 2003.
• Peabody, Michael “Thought & Crime,” Liberty Magazine, March/April 2008.
• Reuters, “Thoughtcrime a Reality: U.S. Toughens Child Pornography Law”. October 2, 1996.
• Guardian report: MPs criticise lock-up plan for mentally ill. July 25, 2000.
• Michael David Crawford: “My Deepest Fear” September 6, 2006.
v • d • e
Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell
Characters Winston Smith • Julia • O’Brien • Big Brother • Emmanuel Goldstein • Comrade Ogilvy • Syme
Places Nations of Nineteen Eighty-Four • Airstrip One • Room 101
Classes Inner Party • Outer Party • Proles • The Brotherhood
Ministries Ministry of Love • Ministry of Peace • Ministry of Plenty • Ministry of Truth
Concepts Ingsoc • Newspeak (wordlist) • Doublethink • Goodthink • Crimestop • Two + two = five • Thoughtcrime • Thought Police • Telescreen • Memory hole • The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism • Two Minutes Hate • Hate week • Prolefeed • Prolesec
Adaptations 1953 US TV • 1954 BBC TV • 1956 film • Diamond Dogs • 1984 film • 1999 parody • 2005 opera
Influence Nineteen Eighty-Four in popular media
Retrieved from “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime”
Categories: Nineteen Eighty-Four | Words originating
24 October, 2009 at 6:56 am
“This is going to happen in America now as well.”
It certainly appears to be that way!
The Jews went for a full on revolution in Russia and won, but then were taken out by Stalin in the 1950s.
Since that failed, here in the USA the Jews are trying a more incremental approach. The end goal however is the same, and soon within most of our life-times (5-10 years) they will try to make it illegal to criticize the (self)-Chosen.
The one thing I haven’t figured how though is how they are going to get around the 2nd amendment. There could be a peasant uprising of people with AK-47s instead of pitch-forks that becomes a full on Pogrom if the Jews push to far… WHICH THEY ALWAYS DO!
(PS hey when are you guys going to activate my forum account, I didn’t get the email so can I get like a manual activation?)
24 October, 2009 at 7:13 am
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime
24 October, 2009 at 7:15 am
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?p=1064328#post1064328
24 October, 2009 at 8:24 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYvbIAXveVk&feature=player_embedded
24 October, 2009 at 8:25 am
http://www.vnnforum.com/showthread.php?t=102562
24 October, 2009 at 10:42 am
Nothing this kenyan born coon has done is legal. He needs to be impeached at once! Hell I doubt that he would need to be impeached if he were kenyan born.
24 October, 2009 at 11:05 am
At first, I didn’t think it was a good idea to try and expose Barry Sotero’s foreign birth. I thought it was a wild goose chase that would divert attention from more important issues. But I’ve had more than enough of that phony, incompetent, slick-talking, anti-White token Negro front-man for the Jews. I don’t even care if Joe Biden replaces him, Barry has go to go.
24 October, 2009 at 6:59 pm
Quit talking. Quit complaining. You are a MAJORITY.
FIGHT.
If you cannot do that… you are NOT white…. you are a PROXY white.
24 October, 2009 at 9:19 pm
From what my reading’s in the last ten years the Various NKVD force’s do not have a straight White male majority.
The majority of police will support the regime no matter what for their pay check and badge.
25 October, 2009 at 2:40 am
Anthony Burgess, author of A Clockwork Orange, wrote about another dystopian future world where it was practically illegal to be heterosexual and breed. The title is The Wanting Seed. Nobody remembers it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wanting_Seed
25 October, 2009 at 6:53 am
Burgess is another piece of left-liberal work; this quote is from the link to the wiki on the screenplay posted above: “With the help of his cellmate, a massive black man, Tristram escapes and tries to rejoin his wife [who has been impregnated by his brother].” A Clockwork Orange was the first and only movie that moved me to get up and leave the theater. Living in West LA briefly and taking a close look at Southern California culture including cinema taught me all I needed to know quickly: If its popular, published, screened, on the bookshelves, all the rage, its bullshit.
Those companies of, for, and by homosexuals, for example, include AT&T. Ask yourself if it is in the best interests of your offspring, your daughters, not only to refuse to support homosexuals but to support so called artists such as those supporting Roman Polanski.
As long as people define wealth and success in terms of home equity, the vehicle they’re driving, and other appearances, e.g., a bimbo with rubber titties and dyed hair rather than solid genetics that can suckle infants and pass along a good chance at blond hair to one’s offspring, they are prey to the moneylenders– the merchants of illusion who giveth and taketh away.
Eschew popular culture and obligating yourself for illusions as a first step you can take all by yourself toward freedom. It is not yet illegal to be hererosexual and have children and it is not illegal to take one’s business only to those that don’t endorse miscegination, homosexuality, and offensive war to the detriment of one’s own people.
25 October, 2009 at 5:04 pm
It’s not illegal to be White….yet.