27 November, 2009

Afghanistan: More U.S. Troops Will Fight for Zionism

Posted by Socrates in Israel, Israel - the facts, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism, jewed culture, jewed foreign policy at 11:47 am | Permanent Link

zionism

More American soldiers will fight – and lose their lives/limbs – in order to advance Jewish imperialism in the Middle East. Will Joe Citizen ever stand up and say “no more wars for Israel!”? Not as long as niggerball is on the TV and donuts are in the pantry:

[Article].


  • Similar posts:

    1. 10/14/09 Afghanistan: “Mr. Change” Sends Thousands More U.S. Troops to Fight for Zionism 58% similar
    2. 10/17/08 Proposal: U.S. Troops Would Stay in Iraq Until 2012 42% similar
    3. 07/14/09 U.S. Still Looking Out for Isntreal’s Interests 39% similar
    4. 12/02/08 Another Cost of the Wars for Zionism 33% similar
    5. 12/29/07 The Nature of Zionism 33% similar
    6. 7 Responses to “Afghanistan: More U.S. Troops Will Fight for Zionism”

      1. Tim McGreen Says:

        Imagine that….the once-mighty US military has only about 30,000 troops left to spare. That’s it. If ZOG wants to keep fighting wars of imperial conquest, like attacking Iran, it will soon have no choice but re-instate the Draft. But how will Congress and the President get away with doing that? And how will they manage to keep their own Draft-age children out of the Draft?

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      2. Tim McGreen Says:

        BTW, I think the young woman holding that sign in the photo is a Jewess. Only members of The Tribe are permitted to publicly and openly criticize the Zionist Entity, you know.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      3. M9999 Says:

        I just want it on the record that I am opposed to both wars, have been since they started, and am extremely frustrated that they are continuing. It doesn’t seem to be something that many people think very much about. How else can we explain that both candidates for president last year had continuing these wars as part of their platform? Ridiculous and anger-inducing.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      4. J.J Says:

        Tim McGreen Says:

        BTW, I think the young woman holding that sign in the photo is a Jewess.

        No way, she is an Arab.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      5. Tim McGreen Says:

        Well, she’s some kind of Semite. I wish the Jews and Arabs would fight their battles in the Near East where they belong and leave us out of it.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      6. Gerald E. P. Morris Says:

        Bitch is a jewess. ONLY jews are allowed to criticise I$rael here, period. I used to wear my “Fuck Israel” t-shirts to “Women in Black” demonstrations, which more properly should be named “Skank Jewesses in Black.”

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      7. TimMcGreen Says:

        Exactly, Mr. Morris. It seems there a lot of people here who are being contrary just for the sake of being contrary.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      Leave a Reply

      You may use the following HTML tags in your comments.

      <a abbr acronym b blockquote cite code del em i q strike strong>