20 April, 2010
Commemorating the Anniversary of the Birth of Adolf Hitler
Posted by Socrates in Germany, History for newbies, Hitler, Socrates, history at 9:53 pm | 
Permanent Link
While most politicians are hated, tolerated, or, in some cases, liked, Adolf Hitler was genuinely loved by the German people, and there was a good reason why. Hitler took Germany from being an economic/social mess to being the richest and proudest country in Europe, and he did it in roughly 5 years. That’s an amazing feat which is probably unmatched in human history:
20 April, 2010 at 10:21 pm
Absolutely unmatched. May he rest in peace after his tireless effort’s.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
23 
4
20 April, 2010 at 10:49 pm
Funny how the biggest promoters for perversion and and sick type of filement try to use their shitty media to try and say that Hilter was a pervert.
That is the problem for the Dung miners of Hollywood/NYC as it was Hitlers love of his folk and goodness that was real, as his fighting the shitlovers in the streets and winning!!!!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
17 
2
20 April, 2010 at 10:55 pm
Funny how the biggest promoters in history for every type of sick perverted defilement against Nature its self and any Nation of people to be wholesome and healthy use their filthy media to accuse Hiltler=German people=All Whites as perverts. ONLY because he called them out and told them to get going.
Too bad he was not the man they say he was using their Hollywood media, for if would have been we would not have the sick mess and police state with open borders today.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
13 
1
20 April, 2010 at 11:25 pm
I used to think Hitler was “evil”—–and bought the “lie”,Then i found out about the Jews and their Plan to blend all the races into a compliant mass of coffee-colored Slaves,and their plan to wipe out the Finest of Gods “human” species _ARYAN MAN.Now thats REAL Evil Jews–the greatest slow-motion Planned Genocide of an Entire Race of People over the course of 100 years–Whites brought low from a pinnacle at the turn of the last Century,to facing actual physical extinction in the next 200 years.
Then i had the realization that THATS WHY the Jews hate Hitler SO BAD!He threw a monkey wrench into their genocide machine for awhile,and exterminated THEM for a change.He also showed through his Economic Genius and policies,how Whites Can live in a prosperous,happy,debt-free society without Jews strangling their economy and “importing diversity”,and FOR THAT–the Jews especially hate him.Three Cheers and a Swig of Grog for the Fuhrer–ADOLF HITLER!!!!May his example shine like a light unto the oppressve Darkness of The Jew our Once great country is under.SIEG HEIL!!!SIEG HEIL!!!SIEG HEIL!!!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
37 
3
20 April, 2010 at 11:50 pm
Adolf Hitler, we salute you for your example
of how much a nation can turn around and
prosper once they kick out the kniving jew.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
30 
1
21 April, 2010 at 12:08 am
The German people also saw the problem and didnt like the displacement of german workers for imported cheap foreign laborers. That, along with the pushing of labor unions and communist control by jews in Germany was too much. Jews wanted to really open German borders up next and the people said “nope”
Jews were doing their communist, mass migration, miscegination , wealth redistribution, and banking scams etc, before Hitler even took power.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
21 
0
21 April, 2010 at 12:11 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
18 
28
21 April, 2010 at 12:19 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
13 
22
21 April, 2010 at 3:13 am
Ah, the guy who shook up the Kikes so bad that there’s still no end in sight to their obsessive propaganda war against him. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of them secretly glorify and praise him for inadvertently giving them a highly effective political bludgeon to use against non-PC Whites. Hell, Kikes and all they’ve wrought against Whites probably wouldn’t even be an issue today if he had been wiser and more cautious. Lets hope that the next White savior is.
Also, I found this interesting:
http://www.nazi.org/nazi/policy/speer/
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5 
0
21 April, 2010 at 3:23 am
And how history is repeating itself. Mass immigration polluting European lands,warmongering Jews and their lackeys looking for the next country to anihilate.Goldman Sachs today exposed to the world as the swindling manipulators that white nationalists have known for decades.
For fuck sake, wake up White Man!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
26 
0
21 April, 2010 at 5:04 am
If General Leon Degrelle’s memoirs are an accurate record of his discussions with Hitler, there is strong evidence that Hitler when facing the titanic struggle with the jew communist-capitalist nexus, was developing a Pan European viewpoint.
While the official NS policy was indeed hostile to Slavic groups there is no evidence that Mediterranean peoples were looked down on. Hitler may have doubted the fighting abilities of Italians but he saw, again quoting Degrelle, that France, Spain, and Italy had important roles in creating a strong Europe.
Let’s not wander down the dead end of Nordicism. While Nordic peoples have many great qualities, gullibility isn’t one of them. Blackshirt is correct, Pan Aryanism with respect and honor given to national traditions is the only way forward.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
24 
2
21 April, 2010 at 5:10 am
The Nazis may have been planning to destroy Russia, yet there was a huge army of pro-Nazi and pro-Czarist Russian forces known as the Russian Liberation Army who fought with Germany against the USSR in WWII. At the end of the War, the RLA surrendered to England with the understanding they would not be sent back to the USSR. But Stalin angrily demanded their extradition so he could liquidate all of them. The British, to their everlasting shame, caved in to Stalin.
And of course there was the mighty Galician Waffen SS, along with other Freikorps units made up of Uzbeks, Bosnians, Arabs, Spaniards, etc. So the Nazis were hardly the rigidly ideological Teutonic supremacist villians there are always made out to be by the Jews.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
22 
0
21 April, 2010 at 8:42 am
CW-2, I absolutely agree with you. Let me clarify what I was saying about the whole “Nordic” thing. The anti Slav attitude was there from the very beginning of the National Socialist movement. In Hitler’s case I believe this has more to do with German nationalism than anything else. Slavs had always been competitors and adversaries to Germans for the land in the East, and there had long been cross pollination between the two populations.
CW-2, you are correct that there is no evidence that Hitler or the NSDAP had a specific problem with the Southern Europeans. Up until the time Italy changed sides in the war, Italians and other Southern Europeans were treated very well by the Germans. My issue is with the modern day Nordic/Germanic supremacists out there who invoke Hitler and the National Socialist philosophy as an excuse to label non-Nordics as being somehow a lower order of human, or less than “White”. This issue hits home for me because I have Slav and Southern European heritage.
21 April, 2010 at 9:08 am
Tim,
You are correct about the POA, or Russian Liberation Army. You are also correct about the other Slavic units of the German Army and Waffen SS. I have read about these units extensively and I also know about the specific incidents you are talking about regarding the British and Americans turning over Russian anti-communists to Stalin at the end of the war. This is all true.
There were also elements in the German government and military who were friendly towards the Slavs and who realized that they had great opportunities for support from anti-communist Russians, Ukrainians, etc. As a matter of fact, Wehrmacht troops were met with flowers and goodwill when they entered the Ukraine because Stalin and the commies were so hated by the populace. Alfred Rosenberg was one of the Slav-friendly Nazi ideologues who championed a fair treatment of the Eastern peoples.
When you look at the complex war years in the East, it is important to differentiate the Germans attitude and actions at the beginning of the conflict, and how the Germans acted when the war started going bad for the Third Reich. Those non-Nordic units of the SS only started being created after the Germans started losing the war. During the initial victories the SS was exclusively Germanic/Nordic and was planned to remain that way. It was only after the massive manpower losses on the Eastern front started to compound that the Germans started using non-Nordics. But even then, the POA was not a trusted force, you can see evidence of this in old newsreels where the POA troops are shown parading without weapons- because they were not trusted to be armed until sent to the front.
Ultimately you are correct that the Jews use the “Teutonic supremacist villain” image to great effect when describing the plans for the Eastern peoples and Lebensraum. Unfortunately the evidence shows the initial plans of a victorious Germany were to displace the Slavic peoples and create a large German colony on what was Russian land. Hitler even talks about this in Mein Kampf, so I’m not talking out of my ass. Of course this attitude changed amongst the Nordic supremacist types in the Third Reich when the war started going badly for them. But this wasn’t the initial plan. So despite the fact Jews use the “Teutonic supremacist villain” image against the Germans, when it comes to the Eastern front, there is some element of truth to this evaluation. I’m just calling as I see it/ know it.
Hot debate. What do you think?
10 
11
21 April, 2010 at 9:17 am
I wish to write a post to make a couple points in response to “Blackshirt” and others.Blackshirt i agree with you about Hitlers slavic policy-it was probably his greatest mistake.The destuction of some of the beautiful buildings in St.Petersburg WAS a shame.Along with the destruction of Tolstoys property.That Part of the Russo-German war of 1941-45 was part of a larger struggle between Teuton and Slav for that area of Europe for Centuries.When a group of people are “in your face” always trying to “steal” “your” territory,you tend to aquire animosity.Hitler obviously saw German Culture a superior to Slavic but he was a creature of his time and place.As CW-2 pointed out-the Germans realized and were forced due to manpower shortage-to recruit non Germans.However,i suggest you read “STUKA PILOT” -by Hans Ulrich Rudel,because he clearly mentions the forward staging bases the Soviets were building as prep bases for invading Eastern Europe.Half of the reason Hitler invaded Russia was to protect his oil factories in Rumania.The Reds had recently encroached on them with occupation of Bessarabia.Also the Soviets had occupied the Baltic states in a bloodless invasion,against the treaty agreement.Hitler knew they were planning to strike,Communism is aggressive and expansive by nature lets remember.The final thing that really pissed the Fuhrer off tho–(in my humble opinion),is the meeting that he had with Molotov prior,where Molotov actually had the temerity to lecture the Fuhrer and question the German troops in Finland.Hitler was enraged after that meeting(i gotta admit Molotov is the kind of person you just want to throttle as soon as they open their mouth)and resolved then to annihilate what he always considered the TRUE ENEMY–Judeo-Bolshevism.
I agree we need to put our Sub-Tribe differences and rivalries behind us or soon we won’t have to worry about arguing over them anymore.I personally like Meds and Slavs>Like you Blackshirt-Believe it or Not I am a “Russophile” too-in that i admire the Slavic peoples,and their culture and achievments.They are one of the great branches of the White Tree.Also-And i’m sure i’ll take some flak for this—I think Vladimir Putin is the Greatest “white man” to have come to the front this Century(So far).He has Turned Russia Around Completely,after she was raped by the Jew Oligarchs.I am NOT saying he is anything like Hitler tho except he is a Great White Leader.His whiteness is “implicit” not “explicit” as Hitlers however, as Dr.MacDonald would say.The fact that the Jews want to overtrow his Gov’t show he’s on the right track to maintaining Russian Identity,Culture and Numbers.He also threatened to re-open the investigation of who killed the Czar and his Family,to shut the jews up over something and it worked because they shut up about whatever they were Kvetching about.(its always something with the crybaby Jews)I know Russia would like to extradite many of the “Oligarchs” (read super rich and greedy JEWS)to Russia for criminal charges,but the State to which they Fled has refused them-Israel!Putin is Resurrecting the Russian Nation,Pride and People,and the Jews hate to see any of their former victims recover and prosper,so they are using their Bitch Whores called the USA and NATO to encircle and intimidate mother Russia.The Jews want to destroy Russia (again) and are working toward that goal.Luckily the Russians seem to have gotten “jew-wise” even if they aren’t public about it.
My final comments on the Fuhrer are: he WAS a GREAT MAN!He was not infallible though,( the Fuhrer Prinzip) and on his Slavic policy i am in disagreement,but we need to take in the larger picture of what National Socialism can do for a Country and People beat down by the International Jew.Hitler will forever be a World Historic figure,and the Jews also Hate him and must work to villify him endlessly because they are AFRAID of what an AWAKENED group of ARYAN PEOPLE can do.They don’t want us to thwart our own destruction and genocide again,with the rise of a strong Nationalist Leader like Hitler.Right or wrong-he still gives Millions of our People Inspiration Everywhere.The only Historic figure that outdoes Hitler is Christ.Thats a Huge Testament to His Legacy For Aryan Man.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
0
21 April, 2010 at 9:47 am
I noticed Dr. Pierce’s memorable tribute to AH on what would have been his 100th birthday is not included in the VNN WLP archived essays.
—
The Measure of Greatness
Dr. William L. Pierce
April 20 of this year [1989] is the 100th anniversary of the birth of the greatest man of our era — a man who dared more and achieved more, who set his aim higher and climbed higher, who felt more deeply and stirred the souls of those around him more mightily, who was more closely attuned to the Life Force which permeates our cosmos and gives it meaning and purpose, and did more to serve that Life Force, than any other man of our times.
And yet he is the most reviled and hated man of our times. Only a few tens of thousands of men and women, in scattered groups around the world, will celebrate his birthday with love and reverence on April 20, while all of the scribblers and commentators of the controlled news media, the controlled politicians, and the controlled churchmen will pour out their hatred and venom and lies against him, and those lies will be believed by hundreds of millions. What is the measure of greatness in a man?
Only the most vulgar and doctrinaire democrat would seriously equate greatness with popularity — although in any polling of average citizens on their choice for the greatest man of the century there are certain to be substantial numbers of votes for Elvis Presley, John Kennedy, Billy Graham, Michael Jackson, and various other high-visibility lightweights: charismatic entertainers on the stage of politics, rock concerts, spectator sports, or what have you.
More serious citizens would pass by the lightweights and choose men who have changed the world in some way. We would hear choices like Franklin Roosevelt (“he saved the world from fascism”), Albert Einstein (“he taught us about the nature of our universe”), and Martin Luther King (“he helped us achieve racial justice”), depending upon whether one’s personal inclinations lay more in the direction of politics, science, or racial self-abasement, respectively.
But if the poll asked instead for the most evil man of the century, or the most hated man, or the man having the most negative influence, at least three-quarters of the blue-collar and the white-collar pollees alike would name one man: Adolf Hitler. This, however, would be merely a reflection of the role assigned to him by the controlled mass media, rather than a truly informed and reasoned choice.
All of this raises several very interesting issues. There is, for example, the question of how we came to the preposterous state of affairs prevailing today, wherein we place the destiny of our nation, our planet, and our race in the hands of a mass of voters whose powers of judgment are manifested in such things as the type of television entertainment their preferences have pushed into prime time and the type of men they have elected to public office. And there is the equally weighty question of how, knowing the ease with which this mass is misled, we permitted virtually all of the media of mass information and entertainment to fall into the hands of a race whose interests are so diametrically opposed to our own.
Perhaps even more pertinent to a consideration of human greatness, however, is the question of how our system of values came to be turned on its head, so that Franklin Roosevelt is regarded as a hero and Adolf Hitler as a villain, not only by the stolid and stunned masses, but also by a majority of the supposedly “educated” elite, many of whom pride themselves on their intellectual independence.
Whether we judge the greatness of a man by his intrinsic qualities of character and soul or by his accomplishments, Adolf Hitler had greatness of a very high order — if we use the standards which have been traditional in our race.
We cannot, of course, make comparisons with all the “mute, inglorious Miltons” whose lack of notable accomplishment has made them anonymous, despite the sterling inner qualities they may have possessed. But when Hitler’s character is held up beside those of other 20th-century political leaders, he stands as a giant among pygmies.
At the prosaic level, we can note his ascetic personal habits, compared with Winston Churchill’s habitual drunkenness and notorious self-indulgence; or his personal loyalty to those who had been his comrades in the days of political struggle, compared with Joseph Stalin’s habit of murdering his former comrades by the dozen, as potential rivals, as soon as he no longer needed their services; or his direct, frank, and straightforward manner, compared to the cunning deviousness which was Franklin Roosevelt’s trademark.
At the spiritual level, the inner differences between Hitler and his contemporaries are even more striking. Hitler was a man with a mission, from the beginning. The testimony of his closest associates, from his boyhood days to the end of his life, agrees with the observations of more distant and impartial observers: Hitler had a mystical sense of destiny, a sense of having been singled out and called by a higher power to devote his life to the service of his race.
His childhood companion August Kubizek has related extraordinary evidence of this when Hitler was only 16 years old (August Kubizek, Adolf Hitler, mein Jugendfreund [Graz, 1953], pp. 127-135). Twenty years later, while he was in prison after an unsuccessful attempt to overthrow the government, Hitler himself wrote of his motivation in a way which suggested the range of his vision:
What we must fight for is the security of the existence and reproduction of our race and our people, the sustenance of our children and the maintenance of the purity of our blood … so that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission allotted them by the Creator of the universe.
Every thought and every idea, every doctrine and all knowledge, must serve this purpose. And everything must be examined from this point of view and used or rejected according to its utility. Then no theory will stiffen into a dead doctrine, since it is life alone that all things must serve …
… The National Socialist philosophy finds the importance of mankind in its basic racial elements. In the state it sees on principle a means to an end and construes that end as the preservation of the racial existence of man …
And so the National Socialist philosophy of life corresponds to the innermost will of Nature, since it restores that free play of forces which must lead to a continuous mutual higher breeding, until finally the best of humanity, having achieved possession of this earth, will have a free play for activity in domains which will lie partly above it and partly outside it.
We all sense that in the distant future humanity must be faced by problems which only a highest race, become master people and supported by the means and possibilities of an entire globe, will be equipped to overcome …
Thus, the highest purpose of a National Socialist state is concern for the preservation of those original racial elements which bestow culture and create the beauty and dignity of a higher mankind. We, as Aryans, can conceive of the state only as the living organism of a nationality which not only assures the preservation of this nationality, but by the development of its spiritual and ideal abilities leads it to the highest freedom …
A National Socialist state must begin by raising marriage from the level of a continuous defilement of the race and give it the consecration of an institution which is called upon to produce images of the Lord and not monstrosities halfway between man and ape …
It must set race in the center of all life. It must take care to keep it pure. It must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. It must see to it that only the healthy beget children …
The National Socialist state must make certain that by a suitable education of youth it will someday obtain a race ripe for the last and greatest decisions on this earth …
… Anyone who wants to cure this era, which is inwardly sick and rotten, must first summon the courage to make clear the causes of this disease. And this should be the concern of the National Socialist movement: pushing aside all narrowmindedness, to gather and to organize from the ranks of our nation those forces capable of becoming the vanguard fighters for a new philosophy of life …
We are not simple enough to believe that it could ever be possible to bring about a perfect era. But this relieves no one of the obligation to combat recognized errors, to overcome weaknesses, and to strive for the ideal. Harsh reality of its own accord will create only too many limitations. For that very reason, however, man must try to serve the ultimate goal, and failures must not deter him, any more than he can abandon a system of justice because mistakes creep into it, or any more than medicine is discarded because there always will be sickness in spite of it.
We National Socialists know that with this conception we stand as revolutionaries in the world of today and are branded as such. But our thoughts and actions must in no way be determined by the approval or disapproval of our time, but by the binding obligation to a truth which we have recognized” (Mein Kampf).
Hitler’s opponents, Churchill and Roosevelt, were party politicians, with the minds and souls of party politicians. Great, impersonal goals, just as truth, meant nothing at all to them. The only thing that counted was the approval or disapproval of their times: the outcome of the next election, a good press claque, votes. Only Stalin shared in any way Hitler’s disdain for approval; only Stalin was motivated to any degree by an impersonal idea. But the idea that Stalin served was the alien, destructive idea of Jewish Marxism. And while Hitler served the Life Force with the instincts of a seer, Stalin served Marxism with the instincts of a bureaucrat and a butcher. A comparison of careers leads us to a similar ranking of greatness of soul. Churchill and Roosevelt were born into the political establishment. They fed at the public trough for years, in one office after another, grabbing greedily at opportunities for a bigger serving of swill. But it was circumstance, not their own efforts, which thrust them onto the stage of world history.
Stalin hacked out his own niche in history to a much greater extent than his western allies, and he was an incomparably stronger man than either of them. He was tough, ruthless, infinitely cunning, and utterly determined to prevail, no matter what the obstacles. Even so, his struggle for prominence and power was entirely within the Bolshevik party and its predecessors. He was the consummate bureaucratic infighter, not the innovator or the lone pioneer.
Only Adolf Hitler started literally from nothing and through the exercise of a superhuman will created the physical basis for the realization of his vision. In 1918, recovering in a veterans’ hospital from a British poison-gas attack, he made the decision to enter politics in order to serve that vision. He was a 29-year-old invalid, with no money, no family, no friends or connections, no university education, and no experience. Liberals, Jews, and communists ruled his country, making him and all those to whom he might appeal for support outsiders.
Five and one-half years later he was sentenced to five years in prison for his political activity, and his enemies thought that was the end of him and his movement. But less than nine years after being sentenced he was Chancellor of Germany, with the strongest and most progressive nation in Europe at his command. He had built the National Socialist movement and led it to victory over the organized opposition of the entire Establishment: conservatives, liberals, communists, Jews, and Christians.
He then transformed Germany, lifting it out of its economic depression (while Americans, under Roosevelt, continued to line up at the soup kitchens), restoring its spirit (and much of the territory which had been taken from it by the victors of the First World War), stimulating its artistic and scientific creativity, and winning the admiration (or, in some cases, the envy and hatred) of other nations. It was an achievement hardly paralleled in the history of the world. Even those who do not understand the real significance of his creation must concede that.
And what was the real significance of Hitler’s work? One of his most earnest admirers in India, Savitri Devi, has given us a poetic answer to that question. She wrote:
In its essence, the National Socialist idea exceeds not only Germany and our times, but the Aryan race and mankind itself and any epoch … it ultimately expresses that mysterious and unfailing wisdom according to which Nature lives and creates: the impersonal wisdom of the primeval forest and of the ocean depth and of the spheres in the dark fields of space; and … it is Adolf Hitler’s glory not merely to have gone back to that divine wisdom — stigmatizing man’s silly infatuation for “intellect,” his childish pride in “progress,” and his criminal attempt to enslave Nature — but to have made it the basis of a practical regeneration policy of worldwide scope, precisely now, in our overcrowded, overcivilized, and technically overevolved world, at the very end of the dark age” (Savitri Devi, The Lightning and the Sun [National Socialist World No. 1, p. 61]).
More prosaically, Hitler’s work, in contrast to that of his contemporaries, was above politics, above economics, above nationalism. He had mobilized a powerful, modern state and placed it at the service of our race, so that our race might become fit to serve as an agent of the Life Force.
Perceptive and idealistic young men from every nation in Europe — and from many nations outside Europe as well — recognized this significance, and they flocked to serve him and to fight for his cause, even at the cost of censure and ostracism from their more parochial and narrowminded countrymen. There was never before an elite fighting force to match the SS, which by the end of the Second World War had more non-Germans than Germans in it.
The war, of course, is counted as Hitler’s great failure, even as the proof of his lack of greatness, by his detractors. It merely proves that he was a man, not a god, even if a divine will worked through him, and that he could not perform miracles. He could not defend himself forever, with the governments of nearly the whole world allied in a total war to pull him down and destroy his creation, so that they and the interests they served could return to “business as usual.” Even so, he gave a far better account of himself than any of his adversaries.
And what will count in the long run in determining Adolf Hitler’s stature is not whether he lost or won the war, but whether it was he or his adversaries who were on the side of the Life Force, whether it was he or they who served the cause of Truth and human progress. We only have to look around us today to know it was not they.
http://www.thule-italia.net/devi/devi/library.flawlesslogic.com/measure.htm
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15 
2
21 April, 2010 at 10:50 am
As soon as the FDR Bolsheviks were embedded in the Whore House they Recognized the U.S.S.R. gave Molotov the keys the Russian embassy along with agricultral credits! Then the FDR Cabal instituted State Police in every state as the folk were not to be trusted.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
1
21 April, 2010 at 10:53 am
Forgot to add that IMO the FDR Cabal from Day ONE went to war against all Nations in Europe who were resisting the murder regime paradise called the U.S.S.R. and Hitler who represented Western Civilization !
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
13 
2
21 April, 2010 at 11:06 am
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
10 
23
21 April, 2010 at 12:12 pm
The victors of war get to write the history and that is what we have today with what is taught and seen in the media. I wonder how many of the people who fought Germany are happy about seeing a Marxist mullatto and his black wife and kids defiling the White house. I could go on and on about the millions of squat lows and low IQ heathen blacks causing chaos, but I’ll just leave by saying this was once a great country.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18 
1
21 April, 2010 at 12:34 pm
If he and his cohorts had never existed, some European at that time would have surfaced to opposed the filth that had gained the commanding positions of power thrown the contrived WW1 with extreme nepotism of the cabal
Hot debate. What do you think?
6 
4
21 April, 2010 at 4:56 pm
Blackshirt, at the start of what would eventually become WWII, Hitler’s only intentions were to reclaim those areas of Europe that traditionally belonged to the Reich, such as western Poland, the Rhineland and the Sudentenland. Who could possibly have a problem with that? But then the Jews and their Allied stooges dragged the Reich into a bigger, longer conflict that Hitler never wanted. So you’re right, at first only German troops and a few Dutch/Belgian SS Freikorps soldiers were needed to fight the Allies. But that was not because of any Nazi hostility for non-Germanic soldiers, they just weren’t needed at that point.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10 
3
21 April, 2010 at 5:58 pm
Regarding the question of whether Hitler attacked the Soviet Union without provocation or if it was a pre-emptive strike to forstall a Soviet invasion of Western Europe, the jury is still out. There are good arguments for both sides. Hitler however made one grave mistake that probably cost him the war. After the initial successes of the German Army, when the Germans were welcomed as liberators, a plan should have been formulated to train the Slavs of the occupied territories to create a Slavic National Socialist government whose armies would eventually march along side the Germans to overthrow the hated jew bolsheviks in Moscow.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
13 
0
21 April, 2010 at 7:22 pm
Under Adolf Hitler, Germany built in a few short years, the greatest Aryan society in history. If Germany had emerged victorious in that titanic conflict, the White Race would today dominate the earth. Operation Barbarossa was a tragedy whether or not it was a preventative strike in response to a threat of a bolshevik attempt to invade Western Europe or a unilateral undertaking by Germany.
When the German armies entered the Soviet Union, they were welcomed as liberators. The Germans should have formulated a plan whereby a Slavic National Socialist Government would be established in the liberated territories, and a Slavic National Socialist Army could have fought their way, along with the victorious Germans to overthrow the hated bolshevik regime in Moscow.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11 
0
21 April, 2010 at 8:59 pm
Hitler and his advisers not only brought Germany out of the Depression (the only Western country to break out of it), they promoted the conditions which created unprecedented prosperity in the country. I suspect this is the reason Roosevelt so hated Hitler.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18 
0
21 April, 2010 at 9:26 pm
Reading Mein Kampf, one realizes we are experiencing 1920′s Germany in this country (and in fact much of the world). AH was definitely spot on the with regards to the issues/problems of his society. History does repeat itself.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
17 
0
22 April, 2010 at 5:43 pm
A few more thoughts on the Fuhrer:Blackshirt–I am in agreement about Hitler as a fallible human>The two biggest faults were 1 the “Fuhrer Prinzip”(the Fuhrer is always right,if the fuhrer is wrong see rule 1)That is unrealistic leadership for our people,it works better for some.The second greatest mistake was the overall Slavic policy.Some were for and against using the Slavs to help the German effort.Right or wrong they killed alot of commies and stopped all of Europe from being overrun by them.The SS in particular deserves credit for this.The Allies only landed in time to occupy their “half” of the cake-Europe,which the “allies” had already agreed to split at Yalta.This propaganda of ‘We freed Europe” is Complete Bullshit as Half of it was left to the occupation and tender mercies of the Jew-Bolsheviks.
Another reason Hitler is so Hated and MUST be forever villanized and demonized is because of what he DID ACCOMPLISH,with the German economy,military,and civilian standards of living.Most of all,the Jews must forever CRUCIFY HIM because he and the nation he rebuilt represent what Free Aryan People can do without the yoke of Jewry around their necks.Hitler is the Most World Historic Figure since Christ,and just like Jesus,the Jews did everything they could to destroy him and his image.They are afraid of what an AWAKENED ARYAN people will do when they figure out its the Jews who destroyed their once Great White Nation.So they forever pillory Him as “the greatest evil ever”,when the Greatest Evil Ever is the Jews and their slow-motion Genocide of Whites everywhere ,through abortion,immigration,over taxation,brainwashing(MTV/RAP) and on and on.
I think this is maybe the reason the Jews and the NWO have targeted Russia.They see a strong “nationalist” leader who wants to preserve his people,country,and culture,and keep Russia strong,and the Kikes don’t like that.Putin has imprisoned some of the “oligarchs”(read:super rich and greedy jews who raped Russia when Communism fell),and wants to extradite more.A certain shitty little country in the ME wont release them for punishment tho…….HHmmmmm,wonder why.Its some of the Jew oligarchs who are calling for a revoulution to throw out Putin.Apparently they didn’t rob them enough after 70 years of Communism.The Jews hate anyone who opposes their plans for world economic and finally actual Slavery.Putin heads that list for now.Hopefully we will see the rise here America of a charismatic White Leader the jews will fear.One can only Hope.
Even though Hitler made mistakes,we can still learn valuble lessons from that experience.We need to take Whats best About the Fuhrer and National Socialism and apply it to our Local situations in the country we are in.We must set aside religious,ehtnic,sectional and tribe differences because we are all targeted for extermination.They can’t pull a “Ukraine”on us until they take our guns.So don’t believe the Nigger when he says they have no plans to disarm Americans—–Until the proper CRISIS can be created i’m sure–911 anyone?Feel more free with the Patriot act??Somehow,institutionalized Marxism under a Marxist Negro,with the nation sliding to 3rd world status,is at odds with what our Founders and the Fuhrer would have wanted.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
0
22 April, 2010 at 5:46 pm
Apologies for the similar comments Socrates–I thought my second post didn’t make it on-RS
22 April, 2010 at 9:52 pm
I noticed Dr. Pierce’s memorable tribute to AH on what would have been his 100th birthday is not included in the VNN WLP archived essays.
The Measure of Greatness:
http://www.thule-italia.net/devi/devi/library.flawlesslogic.com/measure.htm
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
23 April, 2010 at 2:56 am
Nice comment Jim. I’ve heard the preparation of the Soviets and their huge Tank force is because they were about to strike germany. But either way you are very insightful about co-opting the people as the German Army went. What Germany lacked was the population to take on Europe, the US and the Soviet Union. That would have helped them with that.
23 April, 2010 at 2:01 pm
Big Uncle fought against Jewish Democratic Capitalism and Communism. Good job while it lasted ! !
23 April, 2010 at 4:44 pm
One of the Great and lasting achievements of A.H. was to bring to the World, filled with Jewish stars, the Great sign of Arian Life Force – the Swastika.
Let this sign of Arian Power to be on our flags, so for our True Gods to recognize us!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
23 April, 2010 at 6:05 pm
It is well and good to honor the Great Aryan Liberator for the things he did right, and these were many and great, yet so too were his mistakes, self admitted! We all need to carefully study those and learn from them. Among those, Jim mentioned above:
“When the German armies entered the Soviet Union, they were welcomed as liberators. The Germans should have formulated a plan whereby a Slavic National Socialist Government would be established in the liberated territories, and a Slavic National Socialist Army could have fought their way, along with the victorious Germans to overthrow the hated bolshevik regime in Moscow.”
Equally disastrous was Hitler and Germany’s ill founded anglophilia. Aside from the small minority represented by Oswald Moseley and some of House Windsor, most of the Tommies, bourgeois kikesuckers and beer-sodden proles alike were full of jew-zionist tommy-rot.
Continued alliance with an utterly worthless political ally, Mussolini, while otherwise engaging in such blatant opportunism as to thoroughly alienate better countries, such as France and Spain, either of which and conceivably both being available, though, due to the haste to embrace an ally before checking it out, the NSDAP backed the wrong gang in the Spanish Republic, when the better side could have been bought with German steel and tech just as cheaply, with better result. Hitler himself admitted as much, too9 late for the good of Germany, and Mankind for that matter… The Goddess of Fortune is one fickle bitch, and is no substitute for solid planning and intelligence, as Stalin would demonstrate, despite some deep purges and his own drunken paranoid homicidal frenzies…
Yet worst of all, following from above was the fact that Hitler BETRAYED THE RANK AND FILE OF HIS OWN PARTY in the Night of Long Knives. Here, the “Goddess of Fortune” cloaked in Weimar Reichswehr drag, and spangled with Ruhr smokestack baronnen Geld, actually seduced Hitler into a FATAL marriage of convenience with the rotten old Junker officer clique which constantly would betray both Hitler and Germany from then on, and a gang of rich fops who did just the same. Yet der Fueher would really only fully realize how BAD these betrayals were when the cowardly von Staufenberg attempted to murder him, while running away from his filthy deed. Thus is betrayal always rewarded, and old poofter Ernst Rohm could laugh at his treacherous old boss from Hel, seeing how Himmler and Goering sold him out. If the matter had been just Rohm, that would have been one thing, but of course Rohm, as Goebbels knew too, represented the truly Revolutionary aspect of National Socialism. when the Volk were sold out, Germany, and Mankind LOST THE WAR RIGHT THEN! Jews and freemasons NEVER CAN BE TRUSTED AT ALL, EVER!
There is an extremely valid lesson to be drawn here; namely, that the OLD Boys Networks of armies and capitalism are so inherently opposed to Aryan Life as to be shunned ALWAYS, regardless of the lures of expediency. I have learned this myself the hard way, but have FINALLY applied it to good effect. No more worries about U.S. government snitches and bitches sabotaging my life or my activies, and NOW that my health has returned, they and their vile kike masters have MUCH to FEAR!
Read Irving’s Hitler’s War, and his works on the rest of that lot. I do regularly, as each reading deepends and sharpens my understanding of what went right, and wrong.
We CAN win, with planning, intelligence and courage.
HAIL ARYAN VICTORY and for his good intentions, despite some tragic errors, yes, Heil Hitler!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8 
2
23 April, 2010 at 7:14 pm
Amen, Mikhail. 14/88.
24 April, 2010 at 8:43 am
Good post, Gerald. Although Hitler was probably the greatest White man who ever walked the earth, he also made many mistakes. Francis Parker Yockey, who dedicated his magnificant opus, “Imperium” to “The Hero of the Second World War” believed that jew capitalism presented a greater threat to the White race than jew bolshevism. During the purge trials of the 1930′s, Stalin got rid of many of the worst of the kikes from the early days of the regime, and he was growing increasingly anti-semetic. Is it possible, that if left to evolve, the Soviet Union would have evolved into a National Bolshevik regime and could have allied itself with National Socialist Germany? Just speculating of course.
24 April, 2010 at 11:28 am
I agree wholeheartedly Gerald, with what you said. Especially the part about Hitler’s anglophilia and the Night of the Long Knives. It is often not mentioned in racial circles that a great majority of those killed during that purge were NOT homosexuals like Rohm. The old Army and industrial class (conservatives and capitalists) wanted Hitler to betray the “Socialist” in National Socialist by purging the NSDAP of it’s anti-capitalist elements such as the Strasser brothers.
I consider myself a Strasserite type of National Socialist, so although I give Hitler credit for the good things he did, I at the same time condemn him for selling out to the industrialists and the Junker class to cement his power. So Hail the SA! Hail Gregor and Otto Strasser!
25 April, 2010 at 3:48 pm
Until recently I’ve been ambivalent when it came to Hitler. Like all humans he made some good and bad decisions. My opinion of him has become more negative of late after I watched a documentary on the Battle of Stalingrad. Hitlers involvement in the decision making was disastrous for the Germans. His orders resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands axis soldiers that wasn’t necessary. Many of them died horrible deaths when the outcome of the battle was already decided. Those soldiers deserved better leaders.
25 April, 2010 at 10:43 pm
The greater the man, the greater his flaws, and Hilter was a truly great man.
There must have been a good reason why Hitler was never promoted above the rank of corporal in the First War.
26 April, 2010 at 12:49 am
For non-Lifer’s serving their Nation/folk in Combat they are waiting to go home not get rank.
26 April, 2010 at 10:44 am
Gerald E. P. Morris Says:
23 April, 2010 at 6:05 pm
===================================
Old boy network ?
Do you think that perhaps today our NKVD forces and military no longer has any old boy network.
Oh, there is network IMO opinion, but it’s not the old one, but a new one.
Admiral Fallon, and the entire top level of the USAF was booted out, and who is in charge now ?
Just my quess based on M.O.
Do you think the present top dogs care or know the facts of this http://www.ussliberty.org.
The front page now has a disclaimer was not there a year ago.
The real hater’s not only whine, but act through their attained powers make US a minority ASAP, with full hate IMO.
26 April, 2010 at 9:56 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
5 
11
26 April, 2010 at 11:05 pm
Wilton, The Second World War was the turning point in hiistory. It was literally a battle between the Forces of Light (Aryans) and the forces of darkness (jews). Hitler did NOT initiate the conflict. The jews had to destroy National Socialism in the cradle before its power of Truth would expose the sinister plan for jew domination of the world. Even though many of the strategies that were employed on the Eastern Front were badly misguided, every soldier that sacrificed his life in that struggle against the forces of world jewry also died that the White Race might live. The ascendency of jewish world domination since 1945, and the nearly total disempowerment of Aryan man has sadly proven that the Forces of Light have been (at least temporarily) defeated. It is the task of a new generation of Aryan heroes of some Whte nation in the world to again take up struggle. Could that nation possibly be Russia? Could all the Aryan blood that was tragically shed at Stalingrad be redeemed, and the ancient Enemy of the Light exposed and disempowered forever?
27 April, 2010 at 2:45 am
The Legioneer’s Diem Ben Foo Viet Nam were mostly German soldiers mislead by French commander’s and perhaps betrayed by own intelligence, who knows.
I met German soldiers who have now passed away in N.Z. Canada and in the Kwa, all were excellent, but broken hearted and I say “men” to the end.
Admiral Conaris was a spy mole who hurt Germany/Europe defending Western Cilvilization greatly and cost the war with out a doubt.
Wilton your post is not worthy IMO.
27 April, 2010 at 2:49 am
The Legioner’s at Diem Ben Foo Viet Nam in 1952 were mostly German soldiers mislead by French commander’s and perhaps betrayed by our own intelligence, who knows.
Gallant and mis-used being set in a valley.
27 April, 2010 at 3:42 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch#!v=0KzqzIR8x4U&feature=related
The trench – the end
The drunkard King Edward allowing the money lunatic tribe of London in 1914 lead all of US to this day.
AH was nothing more than a resistance to filth the real powers knew would arise.
27 April, 2010 at 10:26 am
“Russian Liberation Army who fought with Germany against the USSR in WWII. ”
The RLA never saw any action in combat, except for a few exceptions. Hitler didnt trust Wlassow enough. His failure to enter the Soviet Union as a liberator rather than a conqueror was the most fatal mistake he made. The oppression of the Russian people became more and more ruthless, especially after Stalin launched the Partisan war. And he certainly wouldnt have wanted a Russian domination of Eurasia, but rather a colonialisation of the East in the tradition of Knights of the Teutonic Order in the Middle Age. He was no “white nationalist” at all, a notion that didnt exist back then, but rather a 19th century imperialist, at least in respect to Russia. Sorry to say, but all that is really undisputed historical fact.
27 April, 2010 at 12:58 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
2 
8
27 April, 2010 at 2:14 pm
The countries that were under communism are better off racially then the countries in Western Europe. So maybe communism was good for something. For fucks sake starting stupid wars and getting your best men killed off is not something all that great. Hitler attacked the wrong people when he went after the Central and Eastern Europeans. The Judeo capitlaism of Western Europe and the United States was a MUCH bigger threat. If Hitler didn’t start those wars we wouldn’t have Israel or a Judeo capitalism as powerful as it is today. Hitler could have created a strong Germany that gave people a political system that wasnt two sides of the same Jewish coin, which is what capitalism and communism is.
Wilt the Stilt
Hot debate. What do you think?
4 
6
27 April, 2010 at 5:41 pm
Wilt; You are correct that capitalism and communism are both two sides of the same jewish coin, but Adolf Hitler gave the German people a political and economic system that was the antithesis of them both. Under National Socialism, the system existed to serve the people; not the other way around. The war was forced on Hitler by the jews in the allied nations who were threatened by the success of his new system.
27 April, 2010 at 6:08 pm
“There must have been a good reason why Hitler was never promoted above the rank of corporal in the First War.” –Tim
You may well have a very interesting point there. Somebody too brilliant or original may not “fit in” with the organization.
Well, isn’t Napoleon known as “the little corporal” by those who would also disparage him? (Just as they like to refer to Hitler as a wallpaperer, as if there’s something insulting about doing honest labor in an honest job.) Nevertheless, look at what Napoleon accomplished. He completely revised the map of Europe, re-drew its legal codes, established technical schools, built highways and canals … and would have done much more, if he had been given the chance. He chose as his official emblem the bee – replacing the old French royal symbol of the lily — because a bee never tires of working, just as he was always working.
And yes, there’s no denying he had both his bad points and his good — because he was human.
27 April, 2010 at 8:04 pm
I agree wholeheartedly Gerald, with what you said. Especially the part about Hitler’s anglophilia and the Night of the Long Knives. It is often not mentioned in racial circles that a great majority of those killed during that purge were NOT homosexuals like Rohm. The old Army and industrial class (conservatives and capitalists) wanted Hitler to betray the “Socialist” in National Socialist by purging the NSDAP of it’s anti-capitalist elements such as the Strasser brothers.
I consider myself a Strasserite type of National Socialist, so although I give Hitler credit for the good things he did, I at the same time condemn him for selling out to the industrialists and the Junker class to cement his power. So Hail the SA! Hail Gregor and Otto Strasser!
27 April, 2010 at 8:23 pm
I’m with you guys, Wilton and Rommel. Far too many White Nationalists are such Third Reich fetishists that they take offense at any objective view of the Führer. Just take a look at all the thumbs down I got on my first post on this subject up top! Say one thing bad about Hitler and these folks get all defensive and accuse you of everything in the book. I’ve been dealing with this for a long time unfortunately.
Wilton’s point about the waste of German manhood at Stalingrad and on the Eastern Front is spot on. Just think of the MILLIONS of White men (and women) who were killed in WWI and WWII. Just like I mentioned above, the war against the Soviet Union was a war of German imperialism. Yes, Communism is/was Jewish, but that doesn’t excuse the way Hitler treated the Russians and other Slavs. Hitler had no problem making deals with Communists when it suited his purposes (the Molotov/ Ribbentrop pact of 1939, anyone?) and the war against the USSR was a war of German colonization. Like it was pointed out before by Wilton, Rommel and myself, the Germans were treated as liberators when they first invaded. That useful attitude changed once the Slavs figured out that Hitler wasn’t there to liberate them, but to take their land and make them slaves.
Sorry, but I’m not buying the Hitler worship anymore. National Socialism is the GREATEST political philosophy ever developed, and it was developed by MANY people, Hitler just being one of them. He just marketed National Socialism and used it to create/sustain his power. The ideas of National Socialism were there before Hitler, and they live on after him.
27 April, 2010 at 8:23 pm
I’m with you guys, Wilton and Rommel. Far too many White Nationalists are such Third Reich fetishists that they take offense at any objective view of the Führer. Just take a look at all the thumbs down I got on my first post on this subject up top! Say one thing bad about Hitler and these folks get all defensive and accuse you of everything in the book. I’ve been dealing with this for a long time unfortunately.
27 April, 2010 at 8:24 pm
Wilton’s point about the waste of German manhood at Stalingrad and on the Eastern Front is spot on. Just think of the MILLIONS of White men (and women) who were killed in WWI and WWII. Just like I mentioned above, the war against the Soviet Union was a war of German imperialism. Yes, Communism is/was Jewish, but that doesn’t excuse the way Hitler treated the Russians and other Slavs. Hitler had no problem making deals with Communists when it suited his purposes (the Molotov/ Ribbentrop pact of 1939, anyone?) and the war against the USSR was a war of German colonization. Like it was pointed out before by Wilton, Rommel and myself, the Germans were treated as liberators when they first invaded. That useful attitude changed once the Slavs figured out that Hitler wasn’t there to liberate them, but to take their land and make them slaves.
27 April, 2010 at 8:34 pm
Sorry, but I’m not buying the Hitler worship anymore. National Socialism is the GREATEST political philosophy ever developed, and it was developed by MANY people, Hitler just being one of them. He just marketed National Socialism and used it to create/sustain his power. The ideas of National Socialism were there before Hitler, and they live on after him.
27 April, 2010 at 10:22 pm
“Far too many White Nationalists are such Third Reich fetishists that they take offense at any objective view of the Führer.” …. Blackshirt
………………………………..
I also favor a calm and objective view, and I’m leery of “fetishists” of any stripe. I don’t like personality cults either. But, on the other hand, referring to him as “El Shitler” is not going to win over any converts to Wilton’s point of view.
Yes, AH made mistakes — as we see now IN HINDSIGHT — but who hasn’t? What military leader hasn’t? Name me any political leaders who were 100% right all the time? I’ve made plenty of mistakes too; I just didn’t have armies at my disposal. My own mistakes were only costly to ME.
27 April, 2010 at 10:22 pm
My father always hated the French,he loved the Italians and Greeks. I always hated the Italians and Greeks but loved the French. One day I met some Italian and Greek WN’s and changed my opinion that I held for years!I based my opinions on what,( I say what and not who) turned out to be gypsies from those countries.
Hitler made a lot of mistakes but they were not mistakes I am even qualified to make. He may have done a lot wrong,but at least he did something. My little meetings and get togethers. My organizing attempts,so little in comparison.
If nothing else,he has laid out a blueprint for us to follow,so clear and so easy to see.Do not attack your fellow man,and beware the international jew!
27 April, 2010 at 11:30 pm
88
27 April, 2010 at 11:52 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KzqzIR8x4U
The trench – the end
60,000 English died mostly in the first two hours of the Somme in 1916.
28 April, 2010 at 12:57 am
Gentlemen! Let’s put the blame for all those countless millions of White deaths during both World Wars where they belong….
With the International Jew and his shabbos-goy politicians.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7 
1
28 April, 2010 at 10:05 am
60,000 English died mostly in the first two hours of the Somme in 1916.
==============================================
In 0ct. 1941 two years after Germany was defending Europe a poll was done and the results were that 90% of men wanted NO part of fighting with or for STALIN! Believe it.
Hence Pearl on Dec. 7. 1941
Don’t forget the Flying Tiger’s were set in motion a year before Pearl, so WHO was starting what ?
28 April, 2010 at 10:58 am
Actually, I don’t think you can pin starting WWI on the Jews… but the Versailles treaty is another matter. WWI was mainly the result of two factors, the rivalry between Germany and England to control the European continent and colonies/trade/influence, and the complex system of pacts and mobilization that set the process in motion after the spark blew the powder keg. The spark that blew the powder keg was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand.
28 April, 2010 at 2:01 pm
I apologize calling Hitler, El Shitler. Lets not underestimate the mistakes he made though, it is not like he forgot to pick up a gallon of milk on his way home from work. He sent millions of men to their death when it could have been avoided. Lets not turn the Jews into some mythical people either, they did play a factor in starting plenty of wars, but they aren’t the sole reason. We shouldn’t give those who are manipulaited by Jews a free pass either. if we did we would be no different then the wishy washy Christians who believe a simple “sorry” is all that is needed. We aren’t a bunch of stupid niggers, we Aryans have a sense of responsibility.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
28 April, 2010 at 2:21 pm
Blackshirt, we cannot let the Jews off the hook for their culpability in starting WWI. I believe Gavrilo Princip, the “Serbian” anarchist who asassinated the Austrian Archduke and Archduchess, was a Jew. Jewish bankers and the Zionist movement both stood to gain a great deal from a major European war. The Jews also financed the Japanese in the Russo-Japanese War of 1904-05 in hopes of forcing the Russian Empire to collapse. We all know about their financing of the 1917 Revolution.
The Jews in Germany betrayed their friend the Kaiser during the War for the sake of establishing a Zionist State in Palestine. Many Jews in Germany avoided military service and did everything they could to sabotage the Reich’s war effort from within.
I also recall a statement made by Samuel Roth or Maurice Samuel that the Jews postponed the start of the First War from 1912 to 1914 to get the maximum bang for their buck. Jewish newspapers in the Allied countries also stirred up lots of irrational hatred of the Central Powers. White Americans were even persuaded to smash phonograph records of Beethoven’s music in the streets! Sick! Insane!
Never underestimate the Jews’ determination to foment war. They are NOT invincible, all-powerful gods, but they do know how to manipulate and decieve the public when it’s to their benefit.
28 April, 2010 at 3:47 pm
“White Americans were even persuaded to smash phonograph records of Beethoven’s music in the streets! Sick! Insane!” – Tim
Yes, it was an incredible example of mass hysteria. Mozart, Wagner, Brahms, and other German/Austrian composers were banned; many families of German descent were terrorized and were forced to anglicize their names (for their own safety). The German language and literature were outlawed. There was even a case of a university professor who was arrested for stating in his class that … “English is a low-German dialect.” (A statement that is absolutely correct!)
28 April, 2010 at 6:32 pm
I never heard of Gavrilo Princip being a Jew. I thought he was held in high esteem by Serbian and Slavic Nationalist. I think there was even a Muslim part of the assasiantion squad to take out Archduke Francis Ferdinand. The hero of Serbian Nationalist a sephardic kikenvermin? They must feel like idiots! LOL
28 April, 2010 at 8:18 pm
I’m a little skeptical about Gavrilo Princip being a Jew also, Wilton. In general, people involved with the racial movement/struggle are very quick to label anyone a Jew. I know the Serbian Nationalists are VERY anti-Jew, so I would think they would be the first ones to disown a Jew.
I’m going to do some investigation and I’ll let you all know what I find out.
28 April, 2010 at 11:52 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavrilo_Princip
Gavrilo Princep is described by Wiki as “a Bosnian Serb” nationalist. He sure doen’t look like much of a prize specimen, whatever he was, and not too very white either.
Being not yet 20, he could not be sentenced as an adult, and only got a sentence 20 years (but died during WW One).
29 April, 2010 at 12:09 am
Wilton says: “I thought he was held in high esteem by Serbian and Slavic Nationalist. I think there was even a Muslim part of the assasiantion squad to take out Archduke Francis Ferdinand.”
……………………………
Whatever he was, there is an excellent example of the results of multi-culturalism. The Austria-Hungarian empire was a hodgepodge patchwork of squabbling nationalities, all hating each other, while the folks in Vienna were TRYING to make it work. It didn’t work! And they didn’t even have disparate RACES to deal with there, as we do. Just like the Ottoman Empire didn’t work either. And like the USA is trying to become!
Don’t we learn anything from history? But the Jews always prefer a multi-cultural babel in which they can lose themselves among the swarm of minorities, and thus attract no attention. (Question: what kind of people must hide in the shadows and avoid attracting attention?)
So they keep telling us, despite all the lessons of history, that “diversity gives us strength”. Yeah, sure. Well, at least it’s good for them. They might as well tell us that tuberculosis is good for us too.
29 April, 2010 at 12:11 am
@Black Shirt, I know what you mean about people involved in this movement being quick to call everyone a Jew, it has gotten very tiresome. Gavrilo Princip was basically a poor kid doing dirty work for people in a higher position, that doesn’t exactly fit the profile of a Jew! If anything, he was most likely a patsy!
@Ein, there are some dusky looking Serbs out there, a few who play/played in the NBA come to mind. Don’t forget there has been a long held gypsy community in Serbia/Bosnia, and the Turks did their fair share of genetic damage to the area.
29 April, 2010 at 3:36 am
I think Wilton is a Jew.
29 April, 2010 at 3:38 am
Wilton = Weissberg = Jew
See?
29 April, 2010 at 9:48 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler‘s_Pope
30 April, 2010 at 12:50 pm
No, I don’t see.
30 April, 2010 at 2:04 pm
Then put on your thinking cap, Henry.
3 May, 2010 at 12:01 pm
Whether you are for or against Hitler, his enduring legacy has ensured that any pro-White movement is tainted by association and so doomed to failure. The shadow of der Fuhrer has cast a baleful spell from which the movement has been unable to extricate itself.
3 May, 2010 at 4:46 pm
“his enduring legacy has ensured that any pro-White movement is tainted by association and so doomed to failure.”
Of course, that is not his fault. But the Jews have “ensured” that taint. It serves them very well. They have twisted and shaped his “legacy” to make him serve their purpose. Just call anybody a Hitler or a Nazi, and it will shut them up quick. And it will scare the wits out of everybody else. In the Middle Ages, people were terrified of the Devil. Today, Hitler is the modern Devil that keeps people in line.
If there had never been a Hitler, the Jews would have had to invent one. In fact, the Hollywood “Hitler” that we know now, through movies and such, is largely a Jewish invention.
3 May, 2010 at 6:50 pm
I just watched an old movie starring Alec Guiness about Hitler’s last ten days in the bunker. Real Hollywood Jew nonsense. I thought a fine actor like Sir Alec would have brought some depth and complexity to the role of Der Fuhrer, but no, he didn’t dare displease his Jewish bosses.
4 May, 2010 at 2:10 am
Just get a look at these Hollywood “Nazis”. These are the Nazis that Hollywood and the media all adore. Well, that they love to hate, anyway.
These tattooed, wacky, weirdos have probably never read a word out of Mein Kampf and wouldn’t know what the Weimar Republic was, but Hollywood has been making a living off types like these for many, many years now. What would Hollywood do without them?
So picturesque! So Photogenic! So scary! And a little bit of sex and sadism never hurt at the box office either.
http://gawker.com/5498092/sandra-bullocks-husbands-neo+nazi-friends
4 May, 2010 at 9:23 am
In spite of all his faults, a truly great man like Adolf Hitler only comes into incarnation probably once every thousand years. How long must we wait for another White Man of his stature to arise among us. Will we allow the jews to persuade us to crucify HIM too?
4 May, 2010 at 9:24 am
Well I agree Ein, the Jews, who usually don’t give away anything for nothing, have supplied the goyim first with Christianity and now its substitute Holocaustianity. They haven’t neglected to invent a new incarnation of the devil, none other than Uncle Adolf!