Jews Attack Humanitarian Aid Ship in International Waters, Shoot Aid Volunteers
Posted by Socrates in Israel, Israel - the facts, Jewish aggression, Jewish arrogance, Jewish cruelty, Socrates, Zionism, jewish criminality, jewish hate & hypocrisy at 12:42 pm |
Permanent Link
First, the Jews steal Gaza (in 1967). Then, they turn it into a giant concentration camp. Then, when an aid ship tries to deliver vital supplies to Gaza, the Jews attack the ship. Incredible.
31 May, 2010 at 1:22 pm
“Another Scot believed to have been on the vessel which was boarded was journalist and documentary maker Hassan Ghani, 24, a former Stirling University student from Glasgow.”
BBC, another jew monopoly. Can a raghead be a Scot?
31 May, 2010 at 1:24 pm
The jewish people have proved themselves unable and unworthy of their own state. They are murderers. That’s it. MURDERERS. The are the supposed chosen people of their god, my choice would be to send them all to him; in coffins.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
7
1
31 May, 2010 at 1:55 pm
A former Reagan official, and a survivor of the USS Liberty are among those kidnapped by Jews in international waters”
http://www.israel-palestinenews.org/2010/05/israel-kidnaps-former-us-ambassador.html
All Jews are assholes…
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
22
0
31 May, 2010 at 2:38 pm
This incident shows how inept Israels leadership is. What a public relations disaster!
It’ll be sure joy to watch the spin on this one. The ship was outside of their territorial waters. The people on board the ship were defending themselves from an illegal boarding. There’s no way for Israel and the Amen Corner to win on this one.
And better still it alienated Turkey which further will put them in Irans corner. (Can you add 70 million to the other 70 million?)
Just shows how pathetic Israel is. I though they had such brilliant minds and war strategists! What a joke!
And further this event will demoralize the one decent Jew in Israel.
Thanks for the comedy Israel!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
18
0
31 May, 2010 at 3:28 pm
It would be a comedy except for the fact that thousands of innocent people are being killed by the Zionist Entity and their brutal occupation of Palestinian land. I haven’t heard any right-wing NeoKike response to the massacre yet, what with the meaningless government holiday and all, but I’m sure they will make the usual excuses for their Israeli Jew pals.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11
0
31 May, 2010 at 3:53 pm
The aid flotilla was violating no international laws in trying to deliver medicine and food to civilian victims of an Israeli blockade. Israel on the other hand was most assuredly violating international law in attacking an unarmed aid ship on the open sea.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15
1
31 May, 2010 at 4:35 pm
If anyone has a response to this outrageous slaughter it should be the Islam lovers and their kin, after all it is their fight, and to say the least, they sure have been powerless thus far. Good luck with that.
Our fight is to secure our borders and hold in check the black horde that intends to push us into early graves. There is nothing blacks can accomplish if they put their minds to it, and whites can achieve any level of success if we have the stomach for it. Remember, a mind is a terrible thing to waste on a black ghetto negro.
Hot debate. What do you think?
7
8
31 May, 2010 at 4:47 pm
Unfortunately, Waldo, that shitstorm in the Middle East does involve us, like it or not. And the solution is not to ignore what’s going on over there and start bitching about the niggers over here. The solution is to rise up against our Jew/Corporate/Government masters and wrest control of this country away from them. Then we can deal with the spics and the niggers at our leisure.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
20
1
31 May, 2010 at 5:13 pm
..and so the deranged and murderous TRIBE quite likely triggers another world war…
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9
0
31 May, 2010 at 6:02 pm
All will condemn this act of terrorism, except for their greatest slave, the JewSA. The hypocracy is sickening.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
19
0
31 May, 2010 at 7:31 pm
Three Scots were captured, two of whom were named Ali El-Awasi and Hassan Ghani. I want to puke.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
15
1
31 May, 2010 at 9:45 pm
Do you people really think Israel will be held accountable for this attack? Do you believe Israel’s leaders will express remorse, or offer an official apology? Earth to Vanguard: ISRAEL OPERATES UNDER TALMUDIC LAW!!!! THEY CAN KILL ANYONE THEY WANT (just as long as they’re goyim…) AND NOT FEEL ANY GUILT. 9/11 was Jewish, pure and simple. Those buildings imploded, and that is a fact! One of the telltale signs of Jewish perfidy is how they float their ridiculous explanations/investigations into these matters, especially in their lickspittle media (You pay certain goyim, or ANY Jew enough, and they’ll tell you 3+3=7, and with conviction!) I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for Israel to “Man up” to this latest example of Jewish diplomacy.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
21
1
31 May, 2010 at 10:00 pm
We are coming up on the anniversary of the USS Liberty attack. The demons still have not been held accountable for it, so they sure as hell arent going to get in trouble for this one. Watch Obongo do nothing to condmemn Israhell.
David Baker- You are right on. It is difficult enough to explain the whole jew power structure/conspiracy to the uninitiated, it is even harder to convey the evil jew mindset. We, (non-jews) are nothing but cattle, the jews believe that this is their world because their sky g-d told them so. (Dont forget that most of the Xtian sheep believe this shit too)
Orwells 1984 has become all too real, newspeak/jewspeak and all. Big brother is big jew. Its all a rigged game, “human rights” are a joke, and “collateral damage” is no big deal to the devils children. If the world cant belong to the jews, it will belong to no one. (Samson Option.)
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11
0
31 May, 2010 at 10:26 pm
Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.
Poorly-rated. Like or Dislike:
5
14
31 May, 2010 at 10:30 pm
Klassikality Says:
the jews believe that this is their world because their sky g-d told them so. (Dont forget that most of the Xtian sheep believe this shit too)
Actually only the brainwashed Amerikwan fake ‘Christians’ believe this rubbish. Orthodox and even Catholic Christians all over the world don’t view modern Israel and the Khazars as God’s chosen people. The Orthodox Christians still hate jews.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10
0
31 May, 2010 at 10:43 pm
David Baker says:
“However, you fail to understand that these people at least deserve their day in court, and not to be lumped into some criminal class simply because of their race.” “…ALL Americans are accorded rights, and protected under it’s authority. That was what I swore to defend. And I will defend it to the bitter end, for ALL Americans.”
Am I reading it correctly that you say that the mud people in this country deserve their “day in court” and that you classify these masses of non-whites as constitutionally protected? Obviously you aren’t a White racist with those sort of sentiments.
I say we round these non-whites up humanely and deport them from this land and every other White country on earth. Only resort to violence if they resist, otherwise it can be done civilly and efficiently. As far as I am concerned, the Constitution you hold so dear wasn’t intended to uphold the “rights” of non-whites- our founding fathers certainly never intended it to be that way. And frankly I don’t care what the Constitution says anyway, our enemies don’t seem to care about it, that’s for sure. My mission is to ensure the survival of the White race, by whatever means necessary. If that means the Constitution and the USA go to the scrap-heap, then so be it. Survival is the highest law!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
20
2
31 May, 2010 at 10:48 pm
J.J Says:
“Actually only the brainwashed Amerikwan fake ‘Christians’ believe this rubbish. Orthodox and even Catholic Christians all over the world don’t view modern Israel and the Khazars as God’s chosen people. The Orthodox Christians still hate jews.”
Well, I’m glad that there are still some Christians that hate Jews. Still doesn’t explain the fact that they worship a Jew named Jesus and the desert god of the Hebrews. Kind of schizophrenic if you ask me…
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
14
0
1 June, 2010 at 12:38 am
Seriously kids….sit back, kick out the foot stool, hammer down some Southern Comfort, and rub your hands together.
This is GOOD news.
You see, I am not a Palestinian either. I could care less.
But I DO care about getting the big game kicked off, so it will force the other 99.9% of weak-minded, zero-moral Amerikans off their ass to pick a side, and make a choice.
Remember, for every “bad” thing, Mr. Newton would like to remind you that there is the opposite in action that happens. The game of balance is always in force.
The more Jewsrael pushes…..the more others get tired of it, and the closer you inch to the line HERE. It’s the same as sitting down at a steakhouse, and ordering a steak. You don’t get that steak instantly (since you are not God), but you have to wait.
You ALWAYS have to wait for the GOOD things in life.
As for “God”:
#1- I see no reason to worship a Jew God. Since they are my enemy. And hate me. And everyone hates them. From what I can tell, their God is super-weak, and hasn’t showed up anytime in recent human history to do anything. Not even the Egyptians noticed him.
#2- I see no reason to worship a replacement “Son of God”, named Jesus. Who was a Jew. And killed by Jews. Was he a good teacher?
Absolutely. You might notice he taught common sense, and that if the moon sets, the sun will also rise. In other words, “Anti-Jew” type of stuff.
#3- I don’t need to worship a pre-packed and slickly advertised “God” anyone is selling. Not much of a God if I have to pay someone to talk to him for me. Also means their “God” isn’t all that powerful, and can’t even call me collect on his own dime.
#4- MY God, whatever in the hell that is, I am certain built many things, and decided to hit the bricks and let me figure it out for myself. That is why he made me a human, and not an animal.
Animals need to be told what to do. Actual Humans usually think it out. As such, God built and designed amazingly complex mechanisms, and put those machines into motion. That is the universe, that is me. My failure is to never understand the game, or anything he built. Pretty much blows the “Freemasons” out of the water. They have as many answers to life as my big toe does.
Celebrate your life every day, whatever God built it, designed you to enjoy it. And celebrate the game of death that we are going to get into worldwide, we were designed to do that too. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning of me and my end.
Let the slaughter begin, because without it, we won’t be the last men standing to rebuild it the RIGHT way, in our Republic.
You can never make an omelette without breaking another man’s eggs.
As for Prophecy, let’s ask the Oracle of Delphi:
“Prophecy is usually self-fulfilling….”
And by the way…exactly WHO is selling this “prophecy”?
I don’t seem to remember God stopping by to tell me he is upset with the way it is going, and that I should suddenly listen to religious upstarts and newcomers to a very old world…..
Snake-Oil Salesmen can’t sell a Wise Man any Snake-Oil.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10
1
1 June, 2010 at 12:43 am
Religion has nothing to do with reason. That’s why it’s so potentially dangerous and should be avoided, except maybe as a Sunday social get-together for old ladies.
As I have stated in another post, I would be willing to give some parts of this Continent back to the Red Indians provided they don’t cause any trouble for us. Every other group of non-Whites (under the age of, let’s say, 60) must leave our shores, preferably through a peaceful and orderly process.
Exceptions would be made for those non-Whites who have run legitimate, respectable businesses and/or have contributed positively to their communities. Non-White war heroes (like the Phillipinos or Koreans, for example)and their immediate families could also be exempted. But the only way that Whitey is ever going to regain respect from the rest of the world is through an effective show of FORCE.
Hot debate. What do you think?
8
6
1 June, 2010 at 6:05 am
Christianity died when Judeo-Christianity was sold. Control the preachers ($) you can control the herd. Worship the jew and go straight to heaven. The jews are still laughing about that one.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
11
0
1 June, 2010 at 9:24 am
David Baker, I agree with you on 911 and almost everything else you say regarding the jews. It must be because you are a American Indian that you fail the need for Whites to secure a homeland by of and for Whites EXCLUSIVELY. Yes, its true that we chased you guys off your land and put you on reservations. Back in those days the White Man really had some BALLS. Unfortunately, the kikes have emasculated us much that our White kids watch such bullshit movies like “Dances wiith Wolves’ that instill all kinds of “White guilt” in our young folk. In my day we sang songs of Davy Crockett who “fought single handed in the injun war, til the Cricks was whipped and peace was in store”.
1 June, 2010 at 2:25 pm
I agree with your assesment of Dances with Wolves, Jim. What a douchy movie that was. But Kevin Costner is an asshole anyway.
I’ve noticed that Hollywood westerns are more a reflection of the era when they were filmed rather than being historically accurate to the Old West/Indian Wars period. The 1950s westerns, for example, feature smooth-shaven White men wearing clean, starched and pressed cowboy outfits. The womenfolk are cheerful, obedient and domestically-oriented, everything you’d expect to see in a typical 1950s suburban household. And of course the Red Indians represent the godless Red Commies who need to be killed off.
Then in the 60s and 70s, you had the spaghetti westerns, which were darker, grittier, grungier and more violent, just like the times during which those movies were filmed. And then the early 90s come along and it’s time for the politically-correct new agey slant.
Has anyone else noticed that?
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
0
1 June, 2010 at 2:51 pm
But getting back to the Zionist massacre of those humanitarian aid workers, the Jews are starting to form a totally pathetic and ridiculously fake story about what “actually” happened.
The aid workers, you see, were actually heavily-armed Al Qaeda and Hamas terrorists. (two groups that have nothing to do with each other and may even be hostile to each other) Those terrorists wanted to provoke the peaceful Zionist authorities into killing all of them. And the terrorists did not have any food or medicine on board those boats, no, they only had cement and bricks, which were going to be used to build rockets and other WMDs to be launched against Israel. And the terrorists were so heavily armed that they did not bother shooting back when the peace-loving Zionist navy patrol boarded their boats illegally and opened fire on everyone…in International waters, no less.
Besides, everyone knows that the people of Gaza are being well cared for and there is certainly no humanitarian crisis of any kind going on there…Except for the fact that they all must be punished into submission for electing Hamas. Once they stop supporting Hamas, then the non-existent humanitarian crisis will end, even though it doesn’t officially exist anyway. Got it?
Death to the Zionist Entity.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
8
1
1 June, 2010 at 5:03 pm
Tim said: “I’ve noticed that Hollywood westerns are more a reflection of the era when they were filmed rather than being historically accurate to the Old West/Indian Wars period. Has anyone else noticed that?”
………………………………
That is a very good observation. Yes, I’ve noticed! And it doesn’t apply just to westerns, but to all films, really. They reflect the standards, the speech, the views of the age in which they were made – not the age that they’re supposedly portraying. The actors will be mouthing the currently kosher views of the scrrenwriters who wrote the script, and also of the audience it is intended to reach.
I remember, for example, the movie “Jefferson in Paris”, made about 15 years ago, which was supposedly a highly authentic film, touted for that point, made by Merchant-Ivory and allegedly noted for attention to authenticity.
There were numerous scenes and conversations deliberately meant to highlight the strangeness and irrationality of America’s “peculiar institution” (slavery), and how the more rational and enlightened French found found it difficult to comprehend such a weird and backward custom. I had to think: “Oh really, mesdames et messieurs? You find such a strange custom difficult to understand? I suppose you’ve never heard of Louisiana, Guiana, Haiti, or Martinique?” This being at a time when France still held all of those places! And while France still had serfdom at home right up to the Revolution.
Jefferson, the man, was a polymath — a scientist, diplomat, architect, naturalist, etc. But all of that was played down in favor of his (alleged) obsession for his young slave girl, Sally Hemmings. The writer/maker of the film seemed far more concerned with exploring racial attitudes and relationships (particularly miscegenation) rather than the momentous political and scientific events taking place around all around them at that time (such as the flight of Montgolfier’s balloon, the first occasion in history when humans mastered flight). There were numerous anachronisms, such as kerosene lamps, when they wouldn’t be invented for another century, and references to “meters” when the metric system hadn’t been intented yet. So much for authenticity! But it’s the social attitudes that were the most interesting, and the most emphasized. It was simply propaganda! But attractive and well packaged propaganda, to make it go down more smoothly. There were also occasional feminist plugs inserted that would not have been found in any movie made before the 1960s, and unimaginable in one from the 30s.
Yes, styles change with each decade… but these dialogues were not speech one would have heard from anyone in the 1780s. There was no way they could have imagined such far-fetched notions.
Interestingly, these film makers are not without their own prejudices/goals/agendas. Checking now I find that Ismail Merchant was an Indian Moslem whose father was President of the Moslem League, and Ruth Prawer Jabvala is a German-born Jew [her grandfather was cantor of Cologne's largest synagogue] and is married to an Indian Parsi. So naturally they would be giving us their personal “take” on such wonderful things as miscegenation.
Btw, I wonder (since he’s mentioned above) if Kevin Costner is partly Jewish? Just perhaps? The name (Kastner) would seem very Jewish by origin, despite its obvious anglicization. He doesn’t look or seem Jewish at all — not recognizably anyway — but there could be something Jewish lurking in his background. As we all know, it’s not easy for mere gentiles to get ahead in Hollywood. There’s generally some connection.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6
0
1 June, 2010 at 5:11 pm
Oh, did I neglect to mention that Ruth Prawer Jabvala was the screenwriter for “Jefferson in Paris”? She’s written many other film scripts as well.
1 June, 2010 at 7:36 pm
Blackshirt,
I am opposed to Institutional Racism. I am opposed to Affirmative Action. I am opposed to forced busing. I am opposed to hate crime laws. I am opposed to our tax dollars paying Jews to display false evidence of their alleged holocaust. All of these laws entail the forced abrogation of key Constitutional Rights. You can associate with anyone you wish. You can refuse to associate with anyone you wish. Fine, but don’t believe everyone is subject to your dislikes, or should be thrown out of the country just because you don’t like them. I don’t believe I am superior to anyone just because of my race.
Hot debate. What do you think?
4
6
1 June, 2010 at 11:33 pm
What are you doing here, Baker? We’re White Nationalists.
“I don’t believe I am superior to anyone just because of my race.” We believe in our race above all, regardless of whether our race is superior, middling, or inferior. We have the right to exist and to thrive. Anything standing in the way of this must be smashed, period, no
Whites retook this continent and created the political/cultural/social entity called America. It’s our country, not that of the few thousand chattel slaves here nor their posterity, not that of Red Niggers, or mestizos, or Chinamen, or kikes. America was by, and should be for, Whites only. So we aim to eliminate these others from our presence, to have a White living space where we can live our kind of lives. What we don’t need is Quanservative Quanstitution Queers lecturing us from a position of total cluelessness.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
10
3
1 June, 2010 at 11:34 pm
Erratum: s/b “Anything standing in the way of this must be smashed, period, no argument or dissertations needed.”
2 June, 2010 at 12:57 am
Sean Gruber,
I’m in here because I believe your group is entitled to publicly express your opinions without being subjected to the standard ad hominem, and inferences of Nazi affiliation. I am also in here to express MY views on the TRUE RACISTS, who have so successfully conned the U.S. population into believing they are victims of white nationalists, instead of allowing the public to hear their actual history of leading murderous mafia organizations, as tyrannical commissars, war mongering media zealots, and back-stabbing parasites. People like myself do not last long in ‘approved’ blogs (Please read my entries in the First Light Forum web log concerning holocaust revisionism. That subject will get you kicked out of most blogs.) Though I do not subscribe to racial supremacy, I understand racial separatism. It is your Constitutional Right to associate with people who believe as you do. My main concern is that our nation’s charter is being marginalized in the name of political correctness, and favoring of minorities. You folks call that “Reverse Discrimination”. I call it Tyranny.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9
3
2 June, 2010 at 6:00 am
Ein, I remember that movie Jefferson in Paris. It was filmed at the time when there was a big, phony controversy about whether or not Thomas Jefferson sired some mullato offspring with his high-yellow slave girl Sally. Turns out he didn’t but maybe his brother did.
The main reason for that whole shameful smear-campaign was, if you’ll recall, to show that Slick Willie wasn’t the only unfaithful President we ever had. So in order to deflect attention away from the Gennifer Flowers/Paula Jones/Monica Lewinsky scandals, Clinton’s anti-White liberal friends in Academe and Hollywood decided to drag a long-dead President out of his tomb and subject him to tabloid-style sleaze.
Truly, there was no limit to how low Clinton and his gang of smear-mongers would stoop in order to deflect negative attention away from Slick Willie, even if it meant defaming a Founding Father or launching cruise-missile attacks on Belgrade and Baghdad.
2 June, 2010 at 1:28 pm
Not that I’m any big fan of the Founding Fuckheads, mind you. They had a chance to create a truly revolutionary White republic here but decided on just another slave-owning, money-worshipping, Jew-infested Plutocracy instead.
2 June, 2010 at 4:53 pm
Tim, I am not so sure the Founding Fathers wanted to do the things you mentioned. First, the Industrial Revolution was just beginning and negro farm machinery was basically all they had. Too bad they didn’t recycle it when it was deemed unneeded, but history is littered with bad ideas. I doubt they ever thought in their wildest dreams that whites would ever see blacks as equals let alone lay with them. I feel that it was a stroke of genius that these men would come together at that time, and forge a republic that use to be the envy of the world. I believe that they thought that the white citizens would strengthen the republic over the years and not set out to let interlopers destroy it. I guess now would be a good time to do a post mortem on the U.S.A. and just see where it all went wrong, and when the next time comes, and it will, how to make the constitution iron clad. No jews, No niggers, only whites.
2 June, 2010 at 6:32 pm
“Turns out he didn’t but maybe his brother did. “
Yes, I recall that. Or maybe it was his nephew. Or cousin. Some “male” in the Jefferson family, anyway. And, I think, only provably fathering one of Sally’s many children, at that. It was much less than the movie tried to make it into! Well, that’s Hollywood. You can’t expect too much accuracy from there. But what got me mad was that THIS production team was renowned (supposedly) for its meticulous attention to authenticity!!!
“The main reason for that whole shameful smear-campaign was, if you’ll recall, to show that Slick Willie wasn’t the only unfaithful President we ever had. So in order to deflect attention away from the Gennifer Flowers/Paula Jones/Monica Lewinsky scandals,”
Aha! Now THERE’s a very interesting point that I had not been aware of. Thank you. So that’s another aspect to it. Thank you, Tim. I’m glad someone read it and commented.
Thanks also to Waldo for another good post. I agree with him that the FF, before the Indust. Rev. had yet arrived, could not have imagined all that lay in the future. The tremendous development; the massive wave of immigration; the railroads; the stock market; the growth of banks and finance; the huge cities; the festering slums; the black politicians and bureaucrats; the gangsters; the jostling ethnic interest groups; the swarms of Jews pouring out of the Russian Pale — all of it unimaginable in 1800. People like Jefferson thought the USA would go on being a rural, agricultural society indefinitely, far into the future. It was all they had known. But it would be very brief. All their world was to come tumbling down in several generations.
Even in our own case, could we have imagined it? Can we even imagine today what the (former) USA will look like in another 200 years? I can’t. Could we (and did we) even imagine, back in 1965, the demographic transformation, the affirmative action, that would be everywhere apparent in just another 30-40 years? We were lied to about them, assured they would not happen, and we believed the lies. We didn’t foresee it, just 30 years ahead of us; otherwise the immigration and civil rights bills would never have passed. Our parents, with all good intentions, were consenting to our own death sentences, but didn’t know it. So I don’t blame Jefferson et al.
Every generation is responsible for its own time and must carry its own weight. Your ancestors can’t carry the ball for you forever or take the blame for your failures. Jefferson did the best he could. And it was damn good! He did a great job. We haven’t done nearly so well since.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
5
0
2 June, 2010 at 7:46 pm
“favoring of minorities. You folks call that ‘Reverse Discrimination’”
No, we don’t.
(Maybe one of the older, more conservative posters at Stormfront could have used that term as late as 5 years ago, but no one here uses it, to my knowledge. It is about as dated as tie-dye T-shirts.)
“I believe your group is entitled to publicly express your opinions”
Gee, thanks. Now fuck off.
Hot debate. What do you think?
4
5
3 June, 2010 at 12:33 am
http://www.arlingtoncemetery.net/wlmcgon.htm
Read the letter from the Captain half way down the page.
Courage.
3 June, 2010 at 7:03 am
Ein, Jefferson and most of the other FF’s were great men in many ways, but really, what changed after the so-called “American Revolution”? The same millionaire lawyers and landowners who ran Colonial America wound up ruling Federal America! Nothing really radical or revolutionary happened, did it? Jefferson, Washington and that crowd were angry with the Crown because they were not awarded titles of nobility, so that’s why they started the Revolution. They wanted to be the uncontested rulers of America and not have to share their power with the King or Parliament.
Now, the French Revolution…That REALLY shook things up! But even that was an ultimate failure, because the Bourbons were eventually put back in power.
The Bolshevik and Red Chinese Revolutions were probably the biggest true revolutions in history, because those countries will never be ruled by any Manchus or Romanovs ever again.
Revolutions are a tricky thing, a double-edged sword. We definitely need a revolution here in the USA, but History doesn’t provide many successful examples of how to do it right. The NSDAP won a bloodless revolution in Germany, but our present Jew-controlled American system would never allow a party like that to take shape and win here.
3 June, 2010 at 10:46 am
Tim, you are exacly right about the American Revolution of 1776. It was no true revolution in any real sense of the word. It was largely inspired by the jew infected ideas of freemasonaryand was plutocratic to the core. That is the reason why there was no real opposition to jew immigration from the founding fuckheads. (The supposed speech of Ben Franklin warning about the kikes is probably a forgery). The only REAL revolution we’ve ever had in this country is the jew revolution from 1963-1970 when the kikes totally destroyed the few rights and freedoms that Whites ever enjoyed in this country, and substituted a jewish capitalist nigger tyranny ten times worse than bolshevism.
3 June, 2010 at 11:23 am
Hillary’s vision test transcript, dated 06/01/10.
Patient seated, and told by optometrist to stare straight ahead
Pen held one meter from patient’s head, and in extreme right quadrant.
Patient was unable to see pen.
Pen then held in extreme left quadrant.
Patient was not able to see pen.
Pen held directly in front of patient at eye level at a distance of one meter.
Patient could not see pen.
Optometrist diagnosed patient’s difficulty.
Patient’s nose was removed from between Israel Prime Minister’s gluteal lobes.
All tests were repeated satisfactorily.
3 June, 2010 at 1:15 pm
Sean Gruber, I think you’re either an idiot, or ADL. Which one is it?
Hot debate. What do you think?
4
5
3 June, 2010 at 1:39 pm
Tim, your suggestion of a revolution may come to fruition. The poor are getting poorer, the middle class are being squeezed with higher costs of staples, higher taxes, home seizures, fees, fines, foibles (gambling, drugs/alcohol, pornography and vulgar media fare) and unfunded liabilities. What tuly keeps the heat going under these boiling tensions is the media gently ‘reminding’ us that the rich are getting richer. While we scramble to attain what creature comforts we can, our collective noses are rubbed in Jewish narcissism, and their penchant for displaying their superiority and opulence. A cursory examination of their history reveals an almost identical set of circumstances preceding their ouster from other nations who saw their societies decimated by Jewish agendas.
3 June, 2010 at 3:38 pm
“Sean Gruber, I think you’re either an idiot, or ADL. Which one is it?”
I don’t think it’s either one. No, not those. But it’s something.
I used to like Gruber’s posts really A LOT. I thought he was very savvy, one of the best.
But lately, they’ve changed. He disappeared for a while. Now, it doesn’t seem like the same person.
3 June, 2010 at 4:52 pm
David Baker, you never cease to amaze me. You are absolutely right about the jews but absolutely wrong about White anti-racism. I rather suspect that you are not a full blooded Injun, but have a considerable White admixture. lol.
3 June, 2010 at 5:21 pm
All Jewish property in the US should be confiscated as part of the payment for the damage that they have done to our society. The same goes for Europe and the rest of the Western world.
3 June, 2010 at 10:21 pm
David Baker Says:
All of the things you have mentioned would be eliminated by shipping the non-white races from thee North American continent.
Huh?
Fair enough, I’m mainly a separatist too, but you can’t have true separatism with all of these races living in close proximity to each other within the same society. That is why all non-whites have to be deported from White countries, save a small group of Asians to operate Chinese, Japanese, and Thai restaurants. Oh, and a small group of non-whites as diplomats, too.
With all due respect Mr. Baker, the Constitutional rights you speak of are an illusion, just like all “rights”. None of us have rights, they are privileges that can be taken away at any time for a multitude of reasons. As far as the nation’s charter being “marginalized”, I’m afraid that has been the case since before the Civil War. I commend you for your romantic devotion to the Constitution, but it is like being involved in the flat earth society- it will get you no where in the world of reality.
3 June, 2010 at 11:33 pm
Jim, I’m 1/8th Coastal Miwok, I am part Italian, German, and the rest could be described as “Mutt”. I am registered with the BIA, and I received funds from the U.S. treasury for land reimbursement. I apparently am not able to grasp your conception of this racial issue. It’s not because I’m anti-racist, but there must be some special term I’m leaving out that you need me to write. It’s MY contention that we Americans need to take control of the process which diminished our Constitution. Sheep may demure to this regime’s explanations for abrogating our rights, but I am not part sheep. 9/11 opened the door for a tyrannical cabal to introduce egregious legislation, ostensibly to thwart “terrorism”, but not specific enough to exclude U.S. citizens from those who are adversely affected by these rules. It is now virtually a crime to deride the government, and to insist they repeal those provisions. Perhaps the government knows some insurrection is brewing. Investigative agencies who seek the truth about 9/11 and other terrorist activities must succumb to jack boot authority, as the government clamps down on their protests, and attempts to uncover the many mysteries surrounding these events. (Like the five dancing Israeli Mossad agents ‘documenting’ the attack on-and subsequent collapse of- the WTC). Whatever is uncovered by those brave iconoclasts, the nation needs to know just who has endeavored to frighten, control and inconvenience our citizens, and why they insist upon trampling our Constitutional Amendments. That is why we all, black, white, Latin etc must collectively petition this regime to repeal the PATRIOT Act, and allow a full independent investigation into the WTC/Pentagon attack.
4 June, 2010 at 12:10 am
Waldo Starr, long before the Industrial Revolution, the Transcontinental, and John Deere, a noted American sought to expel blacks from the U.S. He agreed with other statesmen that conflicting races accorded similar rights could not coexist in a free society. His name was Abraham Lincoln. In my opinion on this issue, the emphasis on the term “Free Society” should not infer that the government bestows such ‘gifts’. Free societies establish government on the premise that said government performs fiduciary functions: Enforcement of Laws, fielding a defense, collecting and disbursing taxes for the benefit of all citizens. What government doesn’t do is eliminate the Bill of Rights, no matter what justification they provide. They are not supposed to tell you who to hire. They don’t have any business forcing landlords to accept people. They certainly don’t have any business sanctioning abortions, or funding those procedures with money taken from people who object to such actions. Each government official (myself included) takes an oath to support and defend the Constitution. I think they actually are ignoring the consequences of violating that oath, even as the torches are being lit, and the ropes are being prepared for action.
4 June, 2010 at 8:34 am
David Baker, thanks for the clarification. You sounded like a far too intelligent person to have very much Indian blood. I agree with you 100 per cent about the 911 cover up. You appear to be a Ron Paul type Constitutionalist and Libertarian. Let’s face it David, the Constitution has been dead quite a long time. It was formulated by men of White non jewish genes, and will ONLY work in such a society. Remember, David that the phrase from the Declaration “All men are created equal” referred ONLY to White Ango Saxon Englishmen and not to negroes, mestizoes, or other assorted muds. The biggest mistake the Founding Fathers made is in not absolutely excluding jews from setting foot on this Continent.
4 June, 2010 at 11:53 am
Jim, I don’t believe in exclusionary interpretations of our nation’s charter. Your attitude describes the goal of tyrannists to convince our citizenry that their rights are ‘optional’, furnished provisionally by the benevolent authority of a centralized government. I think the indian term for this misconception was “Buffalo Chips”!!! The government was given a blueprint of exacting parameters within which they were to function. The P-E-O-P-L-E were given specific authority to A-B-O-L-I-S-H that government if they got too big for their fiduciary britches (Do you really believe the Second Amendment was shoehorned into the Bill of Rights so “Bambi Killers” could roam freely in Michigan?) Well, they’ve gotten too big for their adult diapers, and it’s about time for the citizenry to ‘change’ those diapers, and to set this jackass administration straight about what functions they perform, and just who is their boss (Right now, their ‘boss’ is Israel.) One other facet of my ‘rant’ (to borrow from Mr. Steele..) The Constitution was derived, ratified, and specifically provisioned to be the authority of U.S. Citizens to limit government to acts “BY CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED”. That means that “%$#@ing piece of paper” scrawled on by your founding fathers is YOUR authority, not THEIRS!!!!
4 June, 2010 at 1:43 pm
David, what don’t you understand? The P-E-O-P-L-E who wrote the Constitution were W-H-I-T-E!!!!!
4 June, 2010 at 5:26 pm
Israeli special forces? I picture a bunch of hysterical Woody Allen/Barney Fife-types shooting innocent people.
.
5 June, 2010 at 3:38 am
No, not so at all. Don’t underestimate your enemy!
Not all Jews are Woody Allen’s. Besides, he’s just a comedian, a Hollywood invention. Don’t be silly!
I picture them as cold-blooded killers, calm, practiced, and ruthless. More like Bugsy Siegels than Woody Allens. But Bugsy was real, Woody is an actor!
5 June, 2010 at 3:53 am
That whole helpless, neurotic, rather pathetic “persona” is just a Hollywood invention to make them look harmless and disarmingly amusing. They are nothing like that!
Do you think they got control of most of the world by being confused, hopeless screw-ups? People who can’t do anything right? Think again! If you think so, you have fallen for the propaganda. Down through the decades, Fanny Brice, Jack Benny, Mrs. Goldberg, Fran Dresher, etc. have all used this front: the nice, friendly, good- natured, but also kind of dopy, helpless, Jewish neighbor who can’t do anything right, but you want to help him/her because the poor jerk is so nice (and funny) that you feel sorry for the hopeless klutz. Such people could NEVER be capable of any sinister conspiracies. Inconceivable! She has all she can do to find her glasses.
5 June, 2010 at 11:58 am
Henry, thank you for the the reality check for those who need it.
After the Crime of mass murder and insurance fraud in NYC about nine years ago so called ordinary jooos got very uppity, waving regime flags and screaming let make a glass parking for those people over there etc.
Serveral time did I witness during the the 02 through 06 time period the enemy alien’s being happy about homo land insecurity and praising war.
Twisting a flag like a towel and then mounting it to the driver’s pillar of their SUV.
The cryptic’s are the worse, because most have no idea who they are.
5 June, 2010 at 2:22 pm
It’s true that not all Jews are like Larry David. But they are a real neurotic, perverted bunch. And have you ever seen how dirty and messy their houses are? They are clearly not domesticated. Nor do the Jews have any aptititude or appreciation for art.
6 June, 2010 at 4:44 am
Someone please provide some information on this subject: My sister, who is a patented Judeophile, tells me Iran’s president threatened the U.S. with destruction. I am well aware of PNAC, and I am also aware that the misnomer in that title is “Project for a New A-M-E-R-I-C-A-N Century”. That doctrine was developed by Jews, for Jews–particularly Israel. I don’t profess any love for those Middle East potentates, but we should at least respect their sovereignty, and certainly we should remember that they supply much of our oil. My question is this: Did ‘Abadabajon’ (sic) threaten the U.S. with destruction? If he did–which I doubt, but Jews can create ‘hate’ with their usual media shenanigans–what particular method could he use to damage the U.S.?
6 June, 2010 at 5:00 am
“The cryptic’s are the worse, because most have no idea who they are.”…. H.Doody
Indeed they are! They make the most effective infiltrators and subverters. They can burrow in amongst you, unnoticed, because they’re partly your own — but they’re working against you.
Very dangerous indeed.
6 June, 2010 at 2:17 pm
Well said, Ein! Yes, the Jews have infiltrated our genetic ranks and are living among us like a dormant virus ready to strike from within when the time is right. Scary!
6 June, 2010 at 4:51 pm
Old Dutch is your post correct ?????
Does any one else know ?
—————————————————
old dutch Says:
31 May, 2010 at 1:55 pm
A former Reagan official, and a survivor of the USS Liberty are among those kidnapped by Jews in international waters”
http://www.israel-palestinenews.org/2010/05/israel-kidnaps-former-us-ambassador.html
All Jews are assholes…
Well-loved. Like or Dislike: 18 0
6 June, 2010 at 6:37 pm
No reply.
Thank You.
6 June, 2010 at 10:20 pm
“My question is this: Did [Ahmadinejad] threaten the U.S. with destruction?”
No. Nowhere and at no time has Ahmadinejad threatened to destroy the United States.
The closest he came to threatening anyone with destruction was when he gave a speech in which he predicted that Israel would eventually fade from the map because of demographics (Arabs outbreeding jews in the area). The judenpresse picked this up and dishonestly translated it as: “We will wipe Israel off the map!” So anytime you hear someone say Iran constantly threatens Israel with destruction, what he is referring to is this false translation from one speech.
Probably that false translation morphed into the alleged “threat to destroy the US” that your sister is hollering about. After all, doesn’t Israel = the US? In the mind of a “patented Judeophile” it does!
Tell her to stop reading the “Little Green Footballs” blog and start reading VNN.
6 June, 2010 at 10:40 pm
“Jim, I don’t believe in exclusionary interpretations of our nation’s charter.”
You say exclusionary like it’s a bad thing.
So the charter was written for niggers, women, the insane, the Somalis, the whole wide world? Excluding no one, not even the fish?
Are you part of Jorge Boosh’s neocon (i.e. JEW) “Democratic Revolution”?
The Constitution didn’t make America. Liberia had a Constitution very similar to ours. Look at Liberia’s history.
The charter was written by and for White Men – and their posterity. The “all men are created equal” shit is in the Declaration. The Constitution states that slaves are only three-fifths of a person for representation purposes, and cannot vote. Later amendments are commie horseshit. This is the “charter” you worship above facts and reality?
“I don’t believe in exclusionary interpretations of our nation’s charter.” Man, quit drinking the high-and-might Kool Aid, pull your nose out of the air, and start looking around at reality. Should Detroit ghetto niggers vote? Should they be “included”?
If a charter or entity includes everyone, it is not a charter or entity. “Everybody wins” means it ain’t a sport. “No one excluded” means it ain’t a nation.
Exclusion is the essence of having a definable group. If everyone is a member, there is no group. Instead, there’s merely every asshole on earth running around. I guess that excludes the Martians, but what if some of them land? The little green men will find you with your nose in the air, piously reciting: “I don’t believe in exclusionary interpretations of our nation’s charter.” Let ‘em in! Let ‘em all in! Yay Ameri-KWA!
Seriously, man. Put the Kool-Aid down. This is a White country or it’s nothing but what it is now: a geographical area in which random bastards bump around, a paying fiefdom in the Jew World Order.
The Constitution had its chance. Where is it now? It failed. Not in your head it didn’t, but out here in real life it did in fact fail.
6 June, 2010 at 11:34 pm
Thank you Sean, you replied to D.B’s post much better than I could. I don’t know if its the guy’s Injun genes that have screwed up his reasoning ability or that damn Kool Aid.
6 June, 2010 at 11:46 pm
Jews have infiltrated our genetic ranks and are living among us like a dormant virus ready to strike from within when the time is right. Scary!
——————-
For some reason, they always seem (like mulattoes) to identify with their non-white side, and to work against the white side. Just look at Obama as an example. But crypto-Jews are even worse, and much more dangerous.
7 June, 2010 at 12:36 am
Sean Gruber, thank you for the information on (I still can’t say that guy’s name) Abadabajon.
About the Constitution: It was not written with the codicil: “Jim determines who these rights apply to”. You cannot deny the rights of other people just because their race is not to your liking. They are here, they are AMERICANS, and they are just as entitled as yourself and Jim to enjoy the freedoms, and accept the obligations of being a U.S. citizen.
8 June, 2010 at 3:59 pm
Henry said:
“No, not so at all. Don’t underestimate your enemy!
Not all Jews are Woody Allen’s. Besides, he’s just a comedian, a Hollywood invention. Don’t be silly!”
brutus replies:
Jews are a physically inferior race, historically ever needing to use non-jews to do their dirty work for them. For crying out loud, jews couldn’t even kill Mr. Pacifist himself, Jesus, without the help of the Romans!
The Mossad are nothing more than a cluster-fuck of idiots. Nearly all of their operations have been heavy-handed failures, and if it weren’t for Uncle Big-bucks jew and their Western minions backing them, they’d be utterly worthless and the laughing stock of the world.
The very idea of an elite jew fighting force – Now that’s silly!
.
8 June, 2010 at 11:42 pm
Giving US Homoland Insecurity, and Airport crap and making laws to shut US up along with a full blown invasion, now that they area good at.
30 June, 2010 at 5:16 am
Nation: A people + land
MR WORLD ["Irishman"] KAMAL IBRAHIM
‘Kamal was only out of nappies when I competed in Miss World, …but he aroused the cougar in me’
I HAVE to admit, meeting Ireland’s first Mr World Kamal Ibrahim did arouse the ‘cougar’ in me!
At just 24, Kamal is, in my eyes, pure perfection.
Not only was he gorgeous, but his decency and general upbeat humour made me almost regret my wedding vows.
And if that wasn’t enough, he also has a private pilot’s licence!
While he might not be as rich as Jim Corr – yet – I can certainly guess which helicopter the majority of ladies, and even some gentlemen, would prefer to fly in.
Over lunch in the Crown Plaza hotel in Santry, Dublin, I struggled to put the thought that Kamal was barely out of nappies when I competed in Miss World 19 years ago out of my head. He politely pretended to be shocked when I told him it was 1991.
However, 10 weeks into his reign as the World’s most beautiful and sexy male, Kamal doesn’t seem to have let the title go to his head.
“It was just a competition. It doesn’t actually mean I’m the best-looking ‘bloke’ in the world,” he pleaded.
“Don’t get me wrong, though, I don’t mind being seen as a piece of meat and I was so proud to win it. I felt like I had won Gold at the Olympics.
Pride
“All I wanted to do was rush back and tell everyone. I was so proud to have done it for my family, for Ireland and for Limerick.”
Recalling my own memories of the experience, I was curious as to how his differed. Clearly his pageant parade beat mine hands down. After all, I didn’t win, but Kamal didn’t give me the sugarcoated version of events.
“The best way to describe it was like military camp and taking part in The Apprentice at the same time,” he revealed.
“After about 15 days of physical exercise and working with Korean Commandos, I was sore, I was tired and everyone started being late. On the day of the final, I actually arrived down only to find everyone had left the hotel without me.”
Kamal held his head in his hands and chuckled as he remembered what happened.
“Then Mr Egypt arrived down asking where everyone had gone. So, we just jumped in a taxi and when we arrived at the venue wev tried to blend into the background as if we had been there all the time.
“We spent the rest of day at rehearsals dancing around on the floor. By the end of it we were all stinking, but we couldn’t get a shower anywhere.
“We ended up having to wash and shave in a toilet with cold water. Not exactly glamorous, but that’s the reality of the industry!
“On the night, all I wanted to do was make the final 15. As far as I was concerned, I had done what I wanted to achieve.
“Then I made the final five.When they called out Ireland as the winner, I couldn’t believe it.”
“I wasn’t expecting it at all – and nor did anyone else. If you look at the faces in the background, there’s loads of people with their jaws hitting the floor!”
Sadly Kamal didn’t have any friends or family to share his big night in South Korea.
“Neither did many of the others,” he explained.
“So I just ran over to my room-mate from Kazakhstan. He was a really funny fella. Spoke exactly like Borat and he was a TV presenter, too!
“Mr World is not a modelling competition, though.They were looking for a role model, a James Bond type character.”
With a licence to kill, I wondered?
“I was in the army – I can shoot people,” he joked.
Ambassador
“But my role means I’m an ambassador for Ireland. I’m a representative for Mr World and generally just a good role model.
“I’m lucky that I’m kinda into my health, so you’d never see me falling in or out of nightclubs.”
As I pulled a few faces, wishing I could say the same for myself, a cheeky smile spread across his face as he admitted: “I do drink the odd time, though. I’m not always a good boy, but I’m quite good at hiding it.
“I had a great time in LA recently. I’m getting quite involved with The Variety Club.
“I made loads of contacts and I got chatting with Simon Cowell and Sarah Ferguson.”
While he didn’t say much about the recently disgraced former royal, he seemed extremely pleased about hooking up with media guru Cowell.
“He was great,” gushed Kamal. “He’s exactly as he is on the telly; very funny, very witty.
“One of my dreams is to become a successful TV presenter and personality like Ryan Seacrest or Dermot O’Leary.
Fake
“So, it was great to meet someone like Simon who can make careers happen.
“I really loved LA. It’s totally fake, but it’s definitely a nice place to visit and have fun.”
As he continued talking, I found myself drifting off in a dreamy haze like I was some sort of lusty teenager.
When he explained how his other ambition was to be a Red Bull Air-Race Pilot so he could show off his daredevil side, I had to wrap up the interview.
Well, I’m only human. Left any longer, I could have been tempted to order a bottle of Champagne – or worse, maybe even a room!
Heck, I’m married, not buried, and a girl can dream, can’t she?
Kamal is managed by Bscene The Agency.Which can be contacted on 01-6709857.