6 July, 2010
Does Israel Make Us Safer?
Posted by Socrates in Israel, Israel - the facts, Socrates, Zionism at 8:51 pm | 
Permanent Link
Posted by Socrates in Israel, Israel - the facts, Socrates, Zionism at 8:51 pm |
Permanent Link
Similar posts:
- 11/29/08 Redefining Hate 55% similar
- 05/21/07 Are You an Immigration “Extremist”? 50% similar
- 01/04/09 How Many More Madoffs? 47% similar
- 02/19/08 “Does Balkanization Beckon Anew?” 47% similar
- 12/09/08 The 1941 Senate Investigation into Hollywood 47% similar
7 Responses to “Does Israel Make Us Safer?”
6 July, 2010 at 10:31 pm
The Zionist “State” of Israel is a cancer on the body of humanity. It was born as a terrorist entity, and exists as a terrorist entity. it has no legitimacy other than by parasitically sucking the life’s blood from legitimate nations. Israelis are often portrayed as “nazis” but actually they are the opposite of nazis. The genocide of jews was never a policy of the Third Reich, but the ongoing genocide of the Palestinians is a daily occurrence in the jewish “State”. Most jews are not even a semitic people, but spring from the Khazar tribe of Southern Russia and have very little semitic blood. Unless the cancer of Israel is neutralized, the possibility of a Third World War that will destroy all Aryan civilization looms nearer on the horizon every day. As White Nationalists, we should give unconditional support to all nations, White or otherwise who are in opposition to Zionism.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
17 
0
7 July, 2010 at 1:41 am
Smash kikism!
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
9 
0
7 July, 2010 at 3:44 am
test
7 July, 2010 at 3:51 am
I read a book alleging that Sirhan Sirhan was some sort of a mind-controlled assassin, which even reproduced several pages from his notebooks, but I don’t recall it ever mentioning that he was Palestinian and that RFK’s pro-Israel platform was an obvious motive for the slaying.
The MSM (including all the conspiracy crap it churns out) clearly would rather have the public think Sirhan Sirhan was a “lone nut” or a “Manchurian Candidate” than explain what his real motivations were.
7 July, 2010 at 9:25 am
quoted from the article:
There is wide agreement that Sirhan’s principal motivation was his anger over U.S. support of Israel generally and Kennedy’s pledge in particular. A Palestinian born in Jerusalem, Sirhan had filled notebooks with rage against Zionists—and against Kennedy, for what the Los Angeles Times reported as “the senator’s advocacy of U.S. support for Israel.”
America’s support of Israel is the primary cause of “terrorism” against us.
Well-loved. Like or Dislike:
6 
0
7 July, 2010 at 3:31 pm
In that article there are links to other articles that are written by Dan Senor and Peter Beinart. But neither one of them is identified as being an ultra right-wing Jew who is an unregistered agent for the state of Israel. Why is that, Daily Beast?
11 July, 2010 at 11:34 pm
The answer si no. What do I win?