Archive for the 'Ayn Rand philosophy' Category

25 March, 2022

Strange Definitions of Leftism

Posted by Socrates in Ayn Rand, Ayn Rand philosophy, Klan, leftism, leftism defining, leftists, liberalism, liberals, Nazi era, Naziphobia, Nazis at 12:07 pm | Permanent Link

Seen on the web: the claim “Nazism is leftist” [1]. I’ve seen this so many times, despite the fact that Nazism opposed Bolshevism and leftism. Some people have odd definitions of what “leftism” is. One guy said that “if you’re an American and you oppose Israel, you’re a leftist.” Actually, the opposite is true: globalism […]



Comments Off on Strange Definitions of Leftism

26 April, 2020

Free Trade/Free Markets: a Slower Poison, But a Poison Nonetheless

Posted by Socrates in Ayn Rand, Ayn Rand philosophy, capitalism, capitalist greed/exploitation, free trade, French Revolution, global vs. local/regional, globalization, International finance capitalism, international Jewry, international socialism, internationalism, jewed culture, jewed economics, Jewed philosophy, jewed politics, Putin, Russia, Russophobia, Socrates, supercapitalism at 10:16 am | Permanent Link

Protect your country in every way, White man, or it will be destroyed. Yes, big capitalism and free trade will destroy your country just as Marxism will, only more slowly. In the end, globalism is globalism, regardless of the flavor. Re: Putin’s Russia: “National social responsibility has succeeded where the crazed, simplistic theories of Adam […]



Comments Off on Free Trade/Free Markets: a Slower Poison, But a Poison Nonetheless

14 May, 2015

Anecdote About Birchers

Posted by Socrates in Ayn Rand, Ayn Rand philosophy, individualism, John Birch Society, Klan, Socrates at 12:59 pm | Permanent Link

In the article below, Dr. Pierce mentions the John Birch Society. That reminded me of a funny anecdote about the JBS. One day, years ago, I went to a JBS meeting. At one point during the meeting, a Bircher warned me that I should avoid associating with groups such as the KKK and neo-Nazis, because, […]



Comments (3) »