Posted by Socrates in 'Middle East', Pakistan, Socrates, sovereignty, Syria, tikkun olam, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 7:28 pm | Permanent Link
by Jacob G. Hornberger: [Here].
by Jacob G. Hornberger: [Here].
Neoconservatism’s tentacles reach farther and farther. This will only anger Syria’s new “big brother,” Russia: [Article].
If no deal is reached, Zionism may suffer a big setback. Indeed, when/if U.S. troops leave, a hard-line Muslim could end up controlling Iraq, which would be bad news for Isntreal. (The United Nations mandate that authorizes the American troop presence in Iraq expires Dec. 31): [Article].
For Israel’s benefit, of course. But a 2008 timetable for troop withdrawal seems worthless, since a lot can happen in four years. The Middle East is an unpredictable place: [Article].
Here’s a major reason for Israel’s multiple invasions of Lebanon: [Article]. More about Israel using Lebanese river water: [Here].
The Jews know very well that Iran won’t attack Israel for a couple of reasons: 1) because the Jewish state has sophisticated nuclear weapons, while Iran has none [1]; 2) Iran knows that America would quickly aid Israel after an Iranian attack. This missile issue – like the nuclear centrifuges issue – is simply another […]
by Charley Reese: [Here].
by Charley Reese: [Here].
by Gareth Porter: [Here].
It can be argued that U.S. troops have already been radicalized by the Jewish ideologies of Zionism and neoconservatism. The troops see and treat Muslim countries as enemies when under normal circumstances they wouldn’t [1]. Neoconservatism, with its emphasis on using the U.S. military to transform the world, is a very dangerous ideology that guarantees […]