Archive for the 'New World Order' Category

3 October, 2009

Posted by Socrates in democracy, democrazy, global government, globalization, good for jews, immigration, immigration bills/laws, international Jewry, Ireland, Jew World Order, jewed culture, jewed politics, Lisbon Treaty, New World Order, Socrates at 1:27 pm | Permanent Link

Why would the people of Ireland vote “yes” and give away their freedom and sovereignty (especially after they voted “no” the first time, back in 2008)? The answer is that they were tricked into doing so by a clever political campaign. Only scoundrels fool people into doing things that aren’t in their best interests. Shame […]

2 October, 2009

Posted by Socrates in Afghanistan, global government, globalization, good for jews, international Jewry, Jew World Order, Jewish Tyranny, nation-building/nation-wrecking, NATO, New World Order, Serbia, Socrates, tikkun olam, Zionism at 1:53 pm | Permanent Link

Let’s review: “NATO” stands for “North Atlantic Treaty Organization.” Look on a map. Is Afghanistan located anywhere near the North Atlantic? (nope). NATO is basically a military arm of America – recall the U.S.-led NATO bombing of Serbia in 1999: [Article].

25 September, 2009

Posted by Socrates in Big Business, business, capitalism, free trade, globalization, international Jewry, Jew World Order, Marx, New World Order, Socrates at 3:43 pm | Permanent Link

Yeah, ok, Buchanan isn’t one of us; however, this provides a handy excuse to mention free trade: it’s free to erase your job, free to wreck your culture, and it has Jewish roots [1]: [Article]. [1] Karl Marx himself favored free trade: “In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is […]

23 September, 2009

Posted by Socrates in New World Order, Socrates, William Pierce at 11:15 am | Permanent Link

by Dr. William Pierce. “Today let’s talk about the New World Order. We’ve talked about it before, and we’ll be talking a lot more about it in the future. I always used to feel a little funny about using that term. It sounds like the sort of terminology right-wing cranks use. And I think many […]

20 September, 2009

Posted by Socrates in dispossession & destruction, Europe, global government, globalization, good for jews, Jew World Order, jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, Lisbon Treaty, New World Order, Socrates, tikkun olam at 4:26 pm | Permanent Link

Oy, veh: sovereign, White states are a “threat” to the Jews, veh. So vhat to do, veh? This, veh! [Article], [Article] and [Article].

8 September, 2009

Posted by Socrates in Bretton Woods, global government, globalization, Jew World Order, jewed finance, jewed foreign policy, jewed politics, New World Order, Socrates, tikkun olam, UN at 1:25 pm | Permanent Link

Sounds great for the benefit of Joe Citizen, but let’s get to the root of the matter: who will control the new global currency (either directly or indirectly)? The usual snagglesnoots, that’s who. Note the mention of Bretton Woods, which was created by a snagglesnoot who spied for the Soviet Union: [Article].

7 August, 2009

Posted by Socrates in capitalism, egalitarianism, equality, equalocracy, Islam, Jew World Order, jewed culture, jewed foreign policy, Muslims, New World Order, Zionism at 8:54 pm | Permanent Link

It seems that, at some point, somebody in our government asked the question, “how can America drag the Muslim world (the last holdout) into the New World Order via Zionism, supercapitalism, equalocracy and materialism if we don’t have military bases all over the Middle East?” Or a very similar question: [Article].

6 August, 2009

Posted by Socrates in Cultural Marxism, democracy, democrazy, equality, equalocracy, Jew World Order, New World Order, Socrates, tikkun olam at 11:09 pm | Permanent Link

But, if America doesn’t push Equalocracy onto the rest of the world, then there goes the Jews’ best chance for major tikkun olam: [Article].

31 July, 2009

Posted by Socrates in homosexual themes, homosexuals, Jew World Order, New World Order, political correctness, Socrates at 9:53 pm | Permanent Link

But you can offend White people, especially men: [Article].

31 July, 2009

Posted by Socrates in "civil rights", 'hate', federal power, Jew World Order, New World Order, New York, propaganda, Socrates at 2:59 am | Permanent Link

Apparently, the definition of “threat” has been changed. A threat used to be defined as someone saying or suggesting that he/she is going to take violent or punishing action: [Article].