Archive for the 'War On Israel’s Enemies' Category

29 January, 2008

Posted by Socrates in "war on terror", free speech, jewed foreign policy, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 5:31 pm | Permanent Link

The war on Israel’s enemies – also known as the “war on terror” – isn’t compatible with freedom [1]: [Article]. [1] the convicted “shoe bomber,” a Muslim named Richard Reid, explained to the FBI why he tried to commit terrorism in 2001. He mentioned Israel: [Here]

27 January, 2008

Posted by Socrates in immigration, New World Order, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies at 5:38 pm | Permanent Link

[Here].

22 January, 2008

Posted by Socrates in General Decline, globalization, Jew World Order, jewed foreign policy, Neocons, New World Order, Socrates, war, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 11:29 pm | Permanent Link

World War III draws nearer as the West adopts neoconservative strategy. Thanks to that Jewish ideology, the West is on a collision course with the Muslim world and the safety of the White countries is compromised as a result. Neoconservatism is an aggressive philosophy that is as much of a threat to world peace as […]

21 January, 2008

Posted by Socrates in globalization, jewed Congress, jewed culture, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 3:18 pm | Permanent Link

The “Real ID” card – which is a de facto federal ID card – may soon include biometric information such as a fingerprint or an eye scan, and will be compatible with facial image recognition systems [1]. “Real ID” is part of the war on Israel’s enemies, also called the “war on terror”: [Article]. [1] […]

9 January, 2008

Posted by Socrates in 'Middle East', Iran, War On Israel's Enemies at 2:44 pm | Permanent Link

But isn’t that the whole idea? For America, by its very presence in that area, to provoke some sort of confrontation which eventually leads to a U.S. military strike against Iran, for Israel’s benefit? Such a provoking tactic certainly worked with Imperial Japan [1]: [Article]. [1] i.e., the oil embargo against Japan and the seizure […]

7 January, 2008

Posted by Socrates in jewed foreign policy, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 7:30 pm | Permanent Link

The war on Israel’s enemies – also known as the “war on terror” – now includes laptop file searches. How is this much different from the government entering someone’s home and reading his personal papers without a search warrant? This is a fine example of how our privacy has eroded since Sept. 11, 2001: [Article].

24 November, 2007

Posted by Socrates in Iraq, jewed culture, Socrates, war, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 5:15 pm | Permanent Link

According to the Jewish columnist Krauthammer, the Iraq war is now “winnable.” Why are there fewer deaths in Iraq these days? Part of the reason may be because there are fewer people there. Some of them have fled to Syria or other countries. Population shifts within Iraq could also account for a lower death rate […]

16 November, 2007

Posted by Socrates in Israel, Israel - the facts, Pakistan, Socrates, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 5:08 pm | Permanent Link

Why is the U.S. government so concerned about politics in Pakistan? Israel. Pakistan has nuclear weapons, so if a hard-line Muslim leader comes to power there, it wouldn’t be good for Israel. Also, America needs allies in that region who might cooperate with U.S. foreign policy concerning Israel and/or the Middle East: [Article].

5 November, 2007

Posted by Socrates in Congress, Israel, Israel - the facts, Socrates, war, War On Israel's Enemies, Zionism at 4:28 pm | Permanent Link

It’s a great idea, but it probably won’t pass, due to the power of America’s pro-Israel lobby [1][2]: [Article]. [1] about the pro-Israel lobby: [Here] [2] more about the Constitutional War Powers Resolution: [Here]

27 September, 2007

Posted by Socrates in New World Order, Socrates, USA PATRIOT Act, War On Israel's Enemies at 12:28 am | Permanent Link

At least 7 parts of the USA PATRIOT Act have been voided by the federal courts so far (3 parts in 2007, 3 parts in 2005 and 1 part in 2004) [1]: [Article]. [1] [Here], [Here] and [Here]