Reader Mail: 17 February 2006

At Cable Bay, free speech is more than a marketing gimmick.


Subject: feral = free?

When you spoke of only feral man being truly free, it reminded me of something I'd read on Jacob and Esau. Don't be put off by who wrote it.

Ed. Note: Does it speak more to Christians' stupidity or cupidity that they're fond of naming their sons after a criminal jew?


Subject: Dresden

The Gap between US Rhetoric and Reality

Esquire Magazine

The long suppressed story of the worst massacre in the history of the world.

If the British Commonwealth and the United States last a thousand years, men may say that this was their darkest hour. Were all the crimes against humanity committed during World War II the work of Hitler's underlings? That was certainly the impression created by the fact that only Germans were brought to trial at Nüremburg. Alas! It is a false impression. We all now know that in the terrible struggle waged between the Red Army and the German Wehrmacht, the Russians displayed their fair share of insensate inhumanity. What is less widely recognized -- because the truth, until only recently, has been deliberately suppressed -- is that the Western democracies were responsible for the most senseless single act of mass murder committed in the whole course of World War II.


Subject: no one trusts the jews who run "our" media

US Media at 'All-Time Low'

Arabic-language media have an unprecedented chance to take over as the world's premier news source because trust in their US counterparts plummeted following their "shameful coverage" of the war in Iraq, a conference heard today. The US media reached an "all-time low" in failing to reflect public opinion and Americans' desire for trusted information, instead acting as a "cheerleader" for war, said Amy Goodman, the executive producer and host of US TV and radio news show Democracy Now!, at a news forum organised by al-Jazeera. Newsweek's Paris bureau chief, Christopher Dickey, said the US media were dying because of cutbacks and weren't interested in covering the world outside America. But other delegates questioned whether Arabic media were up to the challenge. "The US media have done a shameful job of reporting on the Arab world. With the rise of al-Jazeera and independent media there is a chance for the Arab media to react back, but instead what we get is a clash," said Ethan Zuckerman, the co-founder of Global Voices Online and research fellow at the Berkman Centre for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School.,,1700692,00.html


Subject: Weber on Holocaust cult

Holocaust Remembrance: What's Behind the Campaign?

By Mark Weber

Since the late 1970s "Holocaust Remembrance" has become ever more important in the United States and many other countries. The campaign to remember the Holocaust -- often defined as the genocidal killing of six million Jews in Europe during the Second World War -- includes numerous commemorative events, education courses in many schools, and a stream of motion pictures, television specials, books and magazine articles. Across the United States, prominent political and civic leaders participate in annual Holocaust commemoration ceremonies. A number of countries, including Britain, Germany and Italy, officially observe a yearly Holocaust Remembrance Day. In November 2005 the United Nations General Assembly approved a resolution introduced by Israel to designate January 27 as an international Holocaust remembrance day.


Subject: Butz v Bienen

Iran Has the US's Number

By Arthur Butz

I have been asked "why people are so reluctant to consider" the validity of "Holocaust" revisionism. I shall try to answer that, showing the relationship to Iranian President Ahmadinejad. The principal obstacle to the propagation of revisionism is, simply, fear. At present, the entrenched legend is protected by a system of legal and extra-legal prohibitions ("taboos"). Nobody could dispute the truth of that statement in Europe, where laws in most countries specifically proscribe the expression of revisionist ideas as criminal offenses. For me, the most painful instance of that intellectual terror is the incarceration of my chemist friend Germar Rudolf, presently being held in solitary confinement in a maximum security prison near Stuttgart. His heinous crime? As a chemistry graduate student he did a forensic analysis of the walls of the alleged gas chambers, didn’t find the cyanide residues that ought to have been there and concluded they weren’t gas chambers. The lack of such forensic evidence is well known in the field. For example, in the Wall Street Journal of July 7, 2004, Timothy Ryback wrote that "there is little forensic evidence proving homicidal intent" in the ruins of Auschwitz.


When Reason Gives Way to Hysteria

The Daily Northwestern

President Bienen's tacky and melodramatic press release on Arthur Butz, the Northwestern engineering professor and Holocaust revisionist, succeeded only in brightening Butz's spotlight. Giving a shout-out to those who would have Butz fired and his ideas shut out of the forum, Bienen labeled the offending views as "contemptible," "odious," and "reprehensible" and cited the university's Holocaust credentials. In the end, of course, Bienen made the perfectly obvious point that a professor cannot be fired merely for voicing unpopular or absurd opinions. From Bienen's inflated indignation and laughable hyperbole to the embarrassing student movement to have Butz fired or at least, his Web site shut down, the Butz imbroglio is revealing: We are addicted to outrage.


Ed. Note: It is sheer idiocy to use the term 'revisionist.' It sounds dishonest and deceitful. Use 'factualist.' Call the liars either that -- liars -- or promoters, producers, mythmakers, or fabulists.


Subject: solutions

Alex, you are absolutely correct: "The solution to White problems is vertical integration, technically, and self-determination, politically."

I hope some day that we can launch a genuine and representative peoples' continental congress (its title doesn't have to tell our enemies what we are doing) that will call for and publicize issues that confront Whites and European Americans, but exclude non-European Caucasians, non-Arabic Semites, Arabic Semites, Roma, and so on. Nothing grandiose.

One thing we need to do is to develop low profile property ownership styles for neighborhoods within big cities. Nothing is so unnerving as to see Whites pushed away from the buildings, infrastructure, and institutions that they built for themselves and their children. In any case, the device of a church or private college would do nicely as the land owner with long term leases for the houses owned by qualified members, faculty, or students. The tendency of owning both the land and house will have to be curbed to avoid the devolution of your neighbor's property to his drug addicted daughter living with a Black with Jews for best friends.

Anyway, lots of issues, but little discussion is happening about the creation of new institutions like banks, title companies, insurance agencies, Internet server companies, and so on.

The number one problem is that of overzealous leadership. That's why we prize George Washington over Augustus Caesar. George could have been king in America or dictator, but he exercised restraint, the ultimate White trait. We will need serious thought over the leadership issue because so very many well-meaning efforts to explore the issues have fallen prey to blossoming egos. It's the biggest problem we face, and it's our pathology. We cannot blame anyone else.

William F. Planter
Cupertino, California

Ed. Note: is an ISP which won't buckle under jewish pressure. I believe jews are a bigger problem than white ego. There are many, many laws in place to prevent Whites from working together. There are spies to disrupt them. There are bureaucracies to harass them. The jews cannot allow White men to work together because the result will put the lie to their every claim about diversity. You create a Whites-only state, it would be flooded with would-be immigrants' applications in hours. The jews know that. They feed off us, and they don't want the host prying them off. Legal neutrality, any kind of evenhandedness simply isn't "good for jews," so we can't expect it. We'll get our freedom when the last jew is underground. Even at the level of banking. What would happen if the law allowed White bankers to loan and accept accounts only from Whites? An example and a precedent would be set that would shiver jewish power in every quarter. Even the smallest White association must be spied on and outlawed the minute it begins to generate positive results. That said, one heck of a lot more cooperation among Whites is possible than we now see, and VNN is second to no group in furthering that cohesion and mutual aid. We encourage you to get in touch, whether you're writer, tech guy, banker, real-estate agent...


Subject: Irving case

David Irving to Plead Guilty

David Irving, the British revisionist historian, revealed last night that he would plead guilty to charges of Holocaust denial when he appeared in a Vienna court next week. Mr Irving, 67, who has been held in an Austrian prison since last November, said he did not consider himself to be a Holocaust denier but had no choice but plead "guilty as charged". "Under the law I've got no alternative," he told the television channel More4 News. But he added: "I deny that I'm a Holocaust denier. This is a filthy smear." The charges date back to 1989, when the Right-wing author of books such as Hitler's War gave speeches in Vienna and Leoben in which he disputed the existence of the gas chambers in Nazi concentration camps.


Irving Trial Tests Europe's Free Speech Claims

BBC News

As Europe proudly flexes its freedom of speech credentials in the ongoing row over cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad, even some of his enemies are uneasy that he now faces up to 10 years in an Austrian jail for his unpalatable historical views. The British academic will go on trial in Vienna next week over two speeches he made in Austria in 1989, in which he disputed the existence of gas chambers at Auschwitz. While a number of European countries have laws against Holocaust denial, nowhere has the ban been more sacred than in Germany and Austria, whose very identities have been forged from the rejection of what was perpetrated in the middle of the 20th Century. And yet among Vienna's chattering classes, there are the first rumblings of debate. At the heart of the matter is whether the distortion of such a fundamental period of history is a greater problem than the suppression of the right to express contrary interpretations - however unpleasant, and indeed inaccurate, they may be.

Judge Punishes Four Spectators in Zundel Trial

CBC News

The trial of Holocaust-denier Ernst Zundel, who was deported from Canada to face charges in Germany, resumed Wednesday with the judge rejecting defence motions seeking his removal for alleged bias. Judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen rejected the three motions, filed last week, citing another court's ruling that found there was no reason to doubt his neutrality. Meinerzhagen also fined three spectators at the trial for singing a verse of the German national anthem, which has been banned since the end of the Second World War because of nationalistic lyric content. A fourth spectator was ordered jailed for four days for comparing the judge to a Nazi-era prosecutor.

Zundel's Lawyers Split Over Defense Tactics

National Post

Lawyers for a German man charged with denying the Holocaust split over tactics Thursday as the judge demanded an apology from a defence lawyer for disrupting proceedings. Prosecutors accuse Ernst Zundel, 66, of years of anti-Semitic activities, including repeated denials of the Holocaust -- a crime in Germany -- in documents and on the Internet. Zundel, an apologist for Hitler who was deported from Canada last year and has also lived in the U.S. state of Tennessee, faces up to five years in prison if convicted. Proceedings have been slowed by a string of motions, objections and interruptions from defence lawyer Sylvia Stolz, prompting presiding judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen to accuse her of insulting the court and sabotaging the trial.



Subject: race



We read with interest a recent newspaper column about the World Bank and Latin American countries [1].

It seems that the World Bank has loaned Latin American countries lots of money. But nonetheless, those countries have shown little improvement from the funds [now there's a shocker].

Could it be that those Latin countries are not as successful as White countries due to...uh...race? Could it be that White countries are genetically more successful? Of course, such a question is never addressed today. No one is "allowed" to openly consider why, out of the 192 countries in the world, the most successful ones are White and the least successful ones are non-White. To wonder about that is, according to "experts," to flirt with "racism" - a super-duper-horrible thing that was supposed to have disappeared with the defeat of Those Really Evil Nazis [shudder, tremble] [2].

Maybe if the World Bank gives them more money...

[1] we sort of wonder about the term "Latin America," since Latin was originally a White language; can't they use another term?

[2] strangely, or not, most "experts" on "racism" are non-White, i.e. Jewish, for example Ashley Montagu, who wrote an official anti-racism statement for the UN. Maybe it's just a coincidence, huh?


Subject: "Make no mistake"


The Jew ringmaster mesmerizes the gullible goyim into an ever deeper state of sleep. He whirls his hands ever faster and becomes increasingly glib as he works his Tikkun Olam magic on the white bovina. This is as it must be for those who are expected to send ever more trainloads of money and drums of their kin's blood to support the burgeoning war in the Middle East. With increasing frequency the disinformers cry out, "Itz all about oil! Make no mistake, itz all about oil! Haven't you noticed the price going up at the pumps? It'z those greedy oil barons and their Muslim buddies causing this war! Why did you know that Iran is opening a new bourse will require that purchases of oil use Euros as the exchange? Did you know that is exactly what Saddam Hussein did just prior to the attack on Iraq? "For all the saber-rattling about Iran's nuclear power development, it's the oil and corresponding shift away from complete dollar hegemony over it that are the source of the elitists' fears." See! See! There's your proof, it'z all about oil! Yet leave it to one of the smaller sycophantic turds in the Jew's journalistic toilet bowl to tell the truth, "Israeli military planners have more confidence in the success of an attack on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities and have already begun sending signals to Tehran that it will not be permitted to threatened the Jewish state with annihilation, reports Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin today." Make no mistake about the coming expansion of the Middle East war in the Middle East, itz not about oil - itz all about Jews!


Arch Stanton


Subject: inflation

Is Money Inflation Normal? [1]

A very interesting item about money inflation here:


Subject: New Orleans

new orleans


Subject: the good life

Is this living, or what?

Jewish Celebration in Wartime

You decide:



Subject: mess jew

You all are truly idiots. I am a messianic Jew (good luck, look it up, you don't know what it is), Jew by birth, Christian by choice. Married to a wonderful man (Catholic, you racist) from East India. Love would cure all this shit, if you let it. but you won't. Hate works better for you, as life did not give you all you WANT. Must really suck to be you all.

In the meantime, I now have a new cause to pray for. We are in the last days. Messianic Jews are the 144,000. Count...there aren't that many of us, because of all the hate mongerers in this world. Be a uniter, not a divider. I don't agree with a lot of things that happen, but it is all in God's control. Deal with it. Already. Grow up.

And stop spreading your hate and anger at your situation already, it is really getting old and tired.

Karen B.
Karen Bhagwat


Subject: against violence

I'm surprised you guys find any time to read email, because I bet you get flooded with hate mail. Anyway, I had two questions.

First off, I wouldn't say I'm a White supremacist. I'd just say I'm a White defender. In other words, I'm not sure I can say that whites are the greatest things since sliced bread, but I think that as a white, I ought to have allegiance to my race. Second, I'm not prepared to do violence in the cause of my race, so my first question is this: Do you know of any pro-white organizations that specifically renounce violence?

Actually, I think this would be a lot more palatable to the masses anyway. And if you wanted to have a mass movement that would be necessary to preserve our race, I believe it must explicitly be against violence.



Subject: Resisting Def's 16th syllabus



Resisting Defamation (Sunnyvale, CA) announces the on-line publication of the 16th edition of its syllabus, "Sensitivity Toward European Americans: Diversity Within Diversity."

Lots of new content, analysis, and action steps from a European American movement syllabus...

...Accepting a label imposed by outsiders (e.g., WASP, gentile, Anglo, whitey, goy, gringo, righteous gentile, cracker, hillbilly, lily-white, redneck, or white flight) is dangerous for our European American children as well as a distortion of our European American identity. European Americans have the right to name, label, and describe ourselves. Stealing that right must be bitterly and viciously opposed. Accepting another's label for European Americans disparages ourselves and undermines our right to exist. If you cannot name yourself, you are seriously oppressed whether you know it or not.

...Slurring European Americans is a way for adversaries to claim the right to name European Americans, which is a claim of supremacy over European Americans. Fighting slurs is deadly serious. It's not based on "victimology," it's based on human dignity and decency, especially for young European Americans. Only European Americans have the right to choose a name, label, or description for themselves. It doesn't have to be "European American," either.

...Recognizing the real "white power structure" and its supporting organizations: ADL, SPLC, PAW, and ACLU. The only time the real "white power structure" came out of its closet and strutted its stuff on national TV for three days. Your US Senator is a mere figurehead and will not protect your dignity and decency. He or she dares not, even if willing. And forget about the President.

...Limiting our identity to one word (e.g., White, Aryan, or Caucasian) is a dangerous acceptance of our adversaries' menacing desire to strip European Americans of our internal diversity and to describe us as an entity without variety. We must actively demand recognition for the wonderful variety of our histories, heritages, and cultures.

...Writers who use European American-bashing quotations in newspaper articles and TV shows are guilty of promoting the slurs themselves. It's not excusable just because it is a quote. Bash them back with your own Internet site...see how we do it.

...Why our adversaries' goal is to silence European Americans, not to "instill guilt."

...New explanations about, and examples of, slurs, negative stereotypes, hate caricatures, and white-baiting canards.

...Notion of "white skin privilege" deconstructed, and concept of "market dominant minorities" explained.

And much more EuroAm-centric analysis!

Bo Sears
Resisting Defamation


Subject: Casey Hoff show, with Glenn Miller


Glen was on Casey Hoff's show up in Madison, WI this morning. Check out the audio at the link below, you can download to put the audio up on your site or feel free to link to our site too.

Morgan Welk


Subject: 3rd world is your world


not racial news, but yet it shows how the US has slipped from being an innovator to a 3rd world crap pit


Subject: keep 'em separated


Subject: cc dear jewdy

Dear Judy,

Please believe me, I tried to look at Jews as individuals rather than as a group.

But I could not find hardly any true conservatives.

What I did find was that THE JEWS are enemies of America. They are socialists, they are pro-gay rights, ditto abortion rights, they are anti-gun rights, pro-immigration of non-Christian, non-Europeans by the millions.

No Judy, I have concluded that as a race or a people or ethnic group whatever you want to call them THE JEWS ARE THE ENEMIES OF AMERICA, ENEMIES OF A EUROPEAN CHRISTIAN AMERICA.

Even you Judy, you were a Christian and now you are not.

What are your political beliefs?

How many of that list of 10 items that I sent you did you agree with the conservative position? 5? 3? 7? How many? What ones did you agree with?

There may be as you say "wonderful Jewish people too... who struggle everyday to make a living... who are honest and hardworking and charitable" BUT THEY VOTE LEFTWING JUDY.

They are my enemy. I want them out of America.

More and More of us on the far right are coming to feel this way AND IT IS THE JEWS FAULT since they are almost exclusively leftwing socialists, supporters of diversity and multiculturalism, they are pro-immigration, pro-fag, pro-abortion, anti-gun rights. It is sickening. It is an outrage. We gave them safety and security like they have never known in Europe, but still they have to tear down our European Christian culture.

Judy, JEWS ARE THE CANCER OF AMERICA - I am very sad to say this, but not only do I think it is true, I think I can prove it by listing all of the evils they have done to America. You know it is true too, in your heart.

I am sincerely yours in the pursuit of the truth.

Bob Weinert - BCC List


Subject: American Nazis


I found this on the Birdman site.



Subject: chameleonic jew

The only thing a Jew changes more frequently then his underwear is his name, for the Jews believe that when a name is changed then there is a "new beginning." The only thing a Jew changes more frequently then his name are his alliances. Like a squid, the Jew frequently squirts out clouds of ink and changes the color of his alliances as rapidly as possible to escape detection.


Arch Stanton

World Bank chief tries to distance himself from Bush

Ex-neocon hawk Paul Wolfowitz now touts peace World Bank chief tries to distance himself from Bush

- Dana Milbank, Washington Post

Thursday, December 8, 2005

Washington -- On another day when the Iraq war was tearing Washington apart, a leading architect of that war, Paul Wolfowitz, was donning sheep's clothing over at the National Press Club.

The former deputy defense secretary, now president of the World Bank, gave a 30-minute speech Wednesday about the virtues of peace, the ills of poverty and the benefits of multilateralism -- without a mention of Iraq.

"One of the things that's fun about this job is (that) development is a unifying mission and you can get a lot of people together across a table to put their political differences aside," said the man President Bush calls "Wolfie."

Only when questioners pressed him about Iraq would Wolfowitz address the subject. "How do you account for the intelligence failures regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?" he was asked. "Well," he said after a long pause, "I don't have to."

Being Wolfie means not having to say you're sorry. Nearly three years ago, he offered some of the most memorable forecasts about Iraq: that it was "wildly off the mark" to think hundreds of thousands of troops would be needed to pacify a postwar Iraq; that the Iraqis "are going to welcome us as liberators"; and that "it is just wrong" to assume that the United States would have to fund the Iraq war.

Wolfowitz was 0-for-3 on those, but since taking the World Bank job six months ago he has found a second act. He has toured sub-Saharan Africa, danced with the natives in a poor Indian village, badgered the United States to make firmer foreign aid commitments and cuddled up to the likes of Bono and George Clooney.

But Iraq haunts him still. Outside the National Press Building Wednesday, a half-dozen demonstrators greeted Wolfowitz with a sign saying, "Wolfowitz Is a Weapon of Mass Destruction." Upstairs, Wolfowitz entered the ballroom to scattered applause from a respectable, but not capacity, crowd. Wolfowitz lunched on filet mignon -- and Press Club president Richard Dunham of Business Week tried to goad him into a red-meat speech.

"His admirers have called him the intellectual high priest of the neoconservatives," Dunham said in his introduction. "I can't repeat some of the things his critics have called him."

Wolfowitz pursed his lips and sipped his coffee as Dunham recalled how Wolfowitz "drew fire from Democrats for predicting that U.S. forces would be welcomed as liberators." By the time Dunham got to Wolfowitz's student deferment during Vietnam, Wolfowitz was shaking his head.

Wolfowitz, hoarse with a case of laryngitis, said he had received some lavish introductions before, and "this isn't that kind of introduction." He then read a prepared text that sounded more Mother Teresa than Vice President Dick Cheney.

He noted that there are "as many orphans from AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa as there are children east of the Mississippi." He recalled his visit to "a poor village just outside of Ouagadougou." He lamented the "1.2 billion people worldwide living on less than a dollar a day." And he urged people to remember the World Bank's lofty mission, "helping free the world of poverty."

The crowd was silent through this talk, except for the occasional clink of teaspoon in coffee cup. Dunham, reading questions submitted by the audience, softened up Wolfowitz with some queries allowing him to establish his independence. "I work for 184 countries; I don't work for the Bush administration," Wolfowitz said. He even asserted that Bush's foreign aid spending is not "adequate." With 10 minutes to go, Dunham started the Iraq questions. Wolfowitz insisted that, "believe it or not," his Iraq role has not interfered with his work at the World Bank.

Asked about the weapons in Iraq, Wolfowitz explained that this wasn't his problem. "And it's not just because I don't work for the U.S. government any more," he said. "In my old job I didn't have to. I was like everyone else outside the intelligence community. ... We relied on the intelligence community for those judgments, so the question is, in a way, how do they account for it."

It was an unexpected response from a man who, as the Pentagon's No. 2, sat atop 80 percent of the nation's intelligence budget and an intelligence agency that made particularly aggressive claims about Iraq's weapons. But Wolfowitz said the military shared his fear that weapons of mass destruction could be used against U.S. troops. Wolfowitz was asked about the common criticism that more troops should have been used to pacify Iraq. "Um," he said after a long pause, then paused again before concluding, "I personally don't think more troops would have answered the problem." Dunham took the precaution of presenting Wolfowitz with the customary Press Club mug and certificate "before we ask the final question," and for good reason: It tied the Nuremburg war trials to Wolfowitz and the Iraq war.

Wolfowitz was unbowed. "I still think that what has been done for the United States and the world is something important," he said. Praising the sacrifices of U.S. and allied troops, he added that Iraq will become a place of "tolerance and freedom" in the Muslim world. "I think the whole world, frankly, should be enormously grateful."

Our "neoconservatives" are neither new nor conservative, but old as Babylon and evil as Hell. – Edward Abbey


Subject: Abramoff lobbied for Israeli cell phone network of Congress!!!!

I'm constantly reminded of the most basic tenets of military intelligence, in which we young MI officers were taught that once a person is discovered in his secrets and screw-ups, he is vulnerable to manipulation by cognizant foreign elements. This story about Israeli control of the communications grid -- which I am receiving widely from my Ghost Troop associates -- would mean that they are our rulers by blackmail.

Who's surprised? Isn't pandering to our worst instincts and then turning them against us old Zionist tradecraft? Thanks for the forward, Capt. May

Dieter wrote:

ANSWER(S): Because we are living in one of the most dangerous and corrupt times in the history of mankind... The corrupt Mock Media cannot tell the truth; they are owned by genocidal maniacs. The 'reps' cannot act; they are blackmailed by the same maniacs. The Shadow government is acting in its behalf, but can be strangled any time; Bush and probably Cheney have Mossad assassin bodyguards... what could happen if they 'misbehave' against Israel, when an israeli assassin is their official bodyguard? i wonder how serious have been the private acts of these corrupt officials, that the zionazis have such a stronghold on them, and i am amazed that a person born and raised in this country, and enriched with the robbed taxes of the people, could so treacherously give away the security and future of this nation to a worthless bunc h of filthy rats.

* * *

What bothers me is that there seems to be so little attention in the press about the Foxcom scam.

Basically, Abramoff, with Congressman Ney's help, maneuvered the US House of Representatives into making an Israeli company responsible for installing a cell-phone network for the US Capitol. This involved fraudulent polling of US telecommunications companies, anti-competitive bidding practices, etc. Why aren't any journalists looking seriously into the implications of that?

Given that Abramoff is reputedly supporting violent Zionism in Palestine, it isn't much of a stretch to look into whether the Mossad or other Israeli interests used Congressman Ney to place cell-phone tapping (and other?) equipment in the US Capitol building itself.

If I were a (patriotic) Congressional Representative on the Intelligence Committees, I'd want to immediately want to investigate the possibility of a massive compromise of US internal deliberations by our House of Representatives to Israeli or what other organizations might be interested in communications internal to the US Capitol and its deliberative bodies.

Of course, if I was involved in a national security conspiracy, I might want to look the other way...


Subject: nigs to Utah

Dear Guys,

I'm going to copy part of a letter one of my Marine CO's in Vietnam sent me this past week. Here goes....

"Katrina brought over 500 evacuees to Utah, all of whom stayed for the first month or so at the Utah National Guard's Camp Williams, midway between Salt Lake City and Provo. I volunteered to assist and had a marvelous experience driving vans full of families and kids to this or that recreational facility and just sitting around being a friend. Since many of our guests from New Orleans are staying permanently, Lynne and I, with a lot of help from our neighbors and fellow church members, have sort of adopted one charming family. In addition to largely furnishing their new home through generous donations and helping them moving in, we have hosted the children to birthday parties, and they have shared with us at Thanksgiving and Christmas. It has been, and continues to be, richly rewarding for us all."

This Mormon Moron was and is a fucking idiot. If there ever was a poster boy for a nigger lover, he is it. I was a grunt in a Marine Combat Unit in Vietnam. In the thirteen months I was there my unit had four different CO's. He was the worse by far and that is saying a lot. A complete fool. His favoritism towards Blacks was blatant and we White Marines hated him for it. It's hard not to write him a letter and tell him how much I /we despised him.

I would like to have the power to send him a millon or so more "guests" from Georgia. What this SOB needs is Atlanta 101 for a few years.

Feel free to read this on GoyFire if you like.

An Old Hater in Georgia


Subject: rats pollute La Jolla

- La Jolla Juden show characteristic effrontery. At the same time they want public property marked up so a neighborhood becomes their ghetto of filaments, they are relentlessly insisting that the painful sight of the Mount Soledad cross is removed. Jews forced their way into La Jolla decades ago, and now they are forcing their symbols to be taken up and our symbols to be taken down.

Line of duty

Orthodox Jewish congregations look to eruvs to broaden their sphere on the Sabbath

By Lacey J. Nadeau
February 16, 2006

Some weekends, Orin Green just wants to carry an umbrella. "It doesn't rain very often in San Diego," said Green. "But sometimes it's just nice to have one." A monofilament line identifies a boundary of Beth Jacob's eruv, which expands the "home" for Orthodox Jews during the Sabbath. Two other Orthodox synagogues are seeking city approval to install similar eruvs.

Green is president of Chabad of University City, which strictly follows traditional, Orthodox Jewish laws, including the prohibition of work on the Sabbath. Carrying an umbrella qualifies as work. So does toting young children or pushing strollers outside the home. The traditional solution for thousands of years has been to symbolically expand the "home" into the surrounding community by creating an eruv (pronounced eh-roov, and in Hebrew it means "to mix or to join together").

For nearly six years, members of the University City Chabad and Congregation Adat Yeshurun, an Orthodox synagogue in La Jolla, have been trying to get city approval to construct eruvs by installing high wire borders, which look like fishing line. But this ancient custom is coming up against modern resistance from people who worry that establishing eruvs will turn their neighborhoods into something they don't want to see.

Last week, the La Jolla Shores Association, which is not officially recognized by the city, voted to submit an opinion of disapproval for Adat Yeshurun's eruv, which would cover about a half-dozen square miles. La Jolla resident Phyllis Johnston said she worries that La Jolla Shores will become a "polarized community," if the eruv is constructed, by attracting more Orthodox Jews to move inside its borders.

Beth Jacob Congregation on College Avenue was the first to have an eruv here. Some La Jolla residents are fighting attempts to install one. "If this is approved, obviously we're going to have a Jewish community," said Johnston at last week's meeting. "I don't want to live in an all-Jewish or all-anything-else community."

La Jolla resident Robert Barto referred to eruv proponents as "religious fanatics" and said they were "out of line." Others objected that the continuous monofilament line used to create these borders would obstruct views of the landscape or discourage the planting of trees along the streets where the lines would be strung.



Subject: Gumbel hates humans, likes their women

I guess if blacks can be bored by whites in sports, can whites be bored by blacks in sports?

Or would that be hate?

HBO's Gumbel: Lack of Blacks Makes Olympics 'Look Like a GOP Convention'

There were some eye-opening remarks from Bryant Gumbel on the most recent episode of HBO's Real Sports With Bryant Gumbel. According to a transcript posted by a television columnist named Seth Frelich, Gumbel said the following in his closing monologue last week (emphasis mine):

"Finally, tonight, the Winter Games. Count me among those who don't like them and won't watch them ... Because they're so trying, maybe over the next three weeks we should all try too. Like, try not to be incredulous when someone attempts to link these games to those of the ancient Greeks who never heard of skating or skiing. So try not to laugh when someone says these are the world's greatest athletes, despite a paucity of blacks that makes the Winter Games look like a GOP convention. Try not to point out that something's not really a sport if a pseudo-athlete waits in what's called a kiss-and-cry area, while some panel of subjective judges decides who won ... So if only to hasten the arrival of the day they're done, when we can move on to March Madness -- for God's sake, let the games begin."

Video clip (31 secs), from the Real Sports originally aired February 7, as provided by the MRC's Brent Baker: Real (665 KB), Windows Media (1 MB) or MP3 audio (185 KB).

The comments have received scant coverage, with the San Francisco Chronicle (in a betting column) and The Columbus Dispatch (in a "People in the News" column) among the few outlets that have even mentioned the episode.

Kudos to radio talk-show host Larry Elder for highlighting the remarks.

Gumbel's remarks have been followed by many angry posts at HBO's Real Sports Bulletin Boards. The story was also picked up at Free Republic, where one poster wrote, "Remember what they did to Rush over the McNabb remark. I will contact HBO."

You'd think these remarks would have received more attention than they have. (Well, maybe not.) It's just hard to imagine a Bill O'Reilly or Sean Hannity getting a pass on something like this. Don'tcha think?


Subject: backing Ahmadinejad's holo-truthing

Iranian envoy in trouble over Holocaust remarks

The Iranian ambassador to Portugal was criticized after he voiced doubt about the Holocaust.

"When I was ambassador in Warsaw, I visited Auschwitz and Birkenau twice and made my calculations," Mohammed Taheri told Portugal's RTP radio Wednesday.

"To incinerate 6 million people, 15 years would be necessary."

Taheri further defended Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has called the Holocaust a myth, and said the recent controversy over Danish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed was a "conspiracy by Zionists." In response, the Portuguese government summoned Taheri to lodge a protest.

Portugal's foreign minister, Diogo Freitas, said in a statement that the ambassador's remarks "seriously offended humanity's collective conscience."


Subject: Germar Rudolf

Calling or Letter Writing Campaign to German Embassy for Revisionist Germar Rudolf

Feb. 16, 2006

Dear Friends,

I have been informed by a reliable source that if the German Embassy in Washington is inundated with letters protesting the German government's wrongful imprisonment of Holocaust revisionist scholar Germar Rudolf, this will help Germar and the German government will be far more cautious in their treatment of him.

Germar Rudolf is a brave and brilliant, former Max Plank Institute doctoral chemistry candidate that performed a forensic study of the "Auschwitz gas chambers" and showed they never existed. For this reason, the German government may imprison him for five years!!

I ask everyone on this list to help Germar by calling or writing a letter of protest to the German embassy.

Embassy of Germany
4645 Reservoir Road, NW
Washington, DC 20007
Call Now: 202-298 4393

In your letter, point out that the UN Declaration of Human Rights is very clear and unequivocal on the right to freedom of speech. It states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression." Point out that the the German government stands in blatant violation to this UN Declaration in regard to their treatment of Germar Rudolf.

In addition, you should also mention the case of Ernst Zundel. He too is wrongfully imprisoned by the German government for his Holocaust revisionist beliefs and activities.

Together, we can make a difference!!! Please inform me if you plan to send a letter.


Paul Grubach


Holocaust Handbooks, Volume 15:

Item No. 29

Germar Rudolf: Lectures on the Holocaust. Controversial Issues Cross Examined

In 1976, Holocaust revisionism produced its last "standard work," if there ever was such a thing: Prof. A.R. Butz' Hoax of the Twentieth Century. "How can a quarter century old text not be obsolete today?" Butz asks in the preface of the 2003 edition of his own book, pointing out "the age of this text, and the great advances that have subsequently occurred in Holocaust revisionism." Hence, there is a great need for a new, integrated work summarizing Holocaust revisionism after 30 years of very intensive and thorough research.

And here it is, the new standard work of Holocaust revisionism! It was written by German scholar, writer, and publisher Germar Rudolf, based on the research of the most prominent revisionists, most of which Rudolf had the pleasure to publish in a multitude of German and English language journals and books over the past 15 years.

The book was written to fit the need of both those who have no in-depth knowledge of the Holocaust or of revisionism, as well as for well-versed readers familiar with revisionism. Anyone who wants to bring himself up to date on revisionist scholarship, but does not want to read all the special studies that were published during the past ten years, needs this book!

Since 1992, Rudolf has been giving lectures to various mainstream audiences all over the world. His topic is very controversial: the Holocaust in the light of new forensic and historical findings. His listeners initially think they know exactly what "the Holocaust" is all about, but their world view is completely turned upside down after the evidence is presented. Even though Rudolf p resents nothing short of full-fledged Holocaust revisionism, his arguments fall on fertile soil, because they are presented in a very pedagogically sensitive and scholarly way. This book is the literary version of Rudolf's lectures, enriched with the most recent finding of historiography to a topic regulated by penal law in many countries.

The book's style is unique as is its topic: It is a dialogue between the lecturers on the one hand who introduce the reader to the most important arguments and counter arguments of Holocaust Revisionism, and the reactions of the audience on the other hand: supportive, skeptical, and also hostile comments, questions, and assertions. The Lectures read like a vivid and exciting real-life exchange between persons of various points of view. The usual moral, political, and pseudoscientific arguments against revisionism are all addressed and refuted.

This book is a compendium of Frequently Asked Questions on the Holocaust and its critical reexamination. With more than 1,300 references to sources and a vast bibliography, this easy-to-understand book is the best introduction into this taboo topic both for readers unfamiliar with revisionism and for those wanting to know more.

US $30.00 568 pp. ., 6"x9", pb., ill., bibl., index (Aug. 2005) , ISBN: 1591480019 , ISSN: 1529-7748

You can place your order at:


Subject: Muslim camp

This is a Muslim Camp in South CArolina.


Subject: Russia takes note of jew-hostilities toward Iran

Russia Warns U.S. Against Striking Iran


Associated Press Writer

Russia's top military chief on Thursday warned the United States against launching a military strike against Iran and a top diplomat voiced hope that close cooperation with China could help resolve the Tehran nuclear crisis. With tension mounting over Iran's nuclear programs, Gen. Yuri Baluyevsky, the chief of Russia's general staff, warned the United States against attacking Iran. "A military scenario can't be ruled out," Baluyevsky was quoted as saying by Russian news agencies. He said that while Iran's military potential cannot compare to the United States', "it is hard to predict how the Muslim world will respond to the use of force against Iran." "This may stir the whole world, and it is crucial to prevent anything like that," Baluyevsky was quoted as saying.


Subject: burn the heretic


Religionists condemn Holocaust dissenter

A Letter from the Religion Department Faculty

The Daily Northwestern Monday, 13 February 2006

Unable to answer the arguments of Arthur Butz concerning the "Hoax of the 20th Century"* with coherent, well-reasoned counter-argument, members of the Religious Faculty at Northwestern University, at the behest of Judd A. and Marjorie Weinberg, have condemned the controversial professor in the following bull published in the student newspaper-- ironically on the anniversary of the very real DRESDEN Holocaust of 1945:

"Last week, Arthur Butz, a professor at our university, once again asserted the odious lie that the murder of six million Jews in Europe did not happen. His action brings disgrace to Northwestern.

"Our university president, Henry Bienen, has issued a powerful denunciation of Butz's words and deeds while rightfully making it clear that the administration must support the legal processes of academic freedom and tenure. It is unfortunate that Butz abuses the institution of tenure so crucal to the pursuit of knowledge. His words damage scholars throughout this country.

"While this is not the first time Butz has spread his lies, we think that today's context is significantly altered. He offers his remarks to support recent comments by the President of Iran, whose regime displays increasing extremism even as he publicly advocates "wiping out" the State of Israel. Our academic disciplines remind us of the violent forces people like Butz can unleash, for we know the power that hateful speech can have.

"As scholars we must denounce faked data in every context where it surfaces, whether in a lab making false claims about cloning or in a website making counterfeit pronouncements about history. This is not a matter of a professor with unpopular opinions; this is a matter of a professor who has promoted a fraud and allied himself with forces of hate.

"As members of Northwestern's faculty, we rise to say clearly: Arthur Butz is a moral and intellectual failure. He is not a scholar, and we do not regard him as a colleague. We look forward to the day when he leaves the university and stops debasing its name."


Subject: tales of the holohoax



Subject: NY Sun on special laws privileging jewish lies

Cartoons & Holocaust Deniers


I don't find myself agreeing with the prime minister of Iran about many things, but about one thing, I believe, he is right. It is inconsistent to claim, in the name of freedom of expression, that a Danish newspaper has the right to publish any cartoon of Muhammad that it wants and at the same time to have laws, as do at least seven Western countries, outlawing denial of the Holocaust.

Mr. Ahmadinejad has a point. Either freedom of expression exists as a general principle or it doesn't. If it doesn't, Muhammad cartoons should be bannable even in a democracy. If it does, denying the Holocaust should be permissible, especially in a democracy.

Holocaust denial, needless to say, is a form of anti-Semitism. No one but an anti-Semite - a very rabid one - would make the preposterous charge that the Jews invented the Holocaust, or wildly inflated the number of Jewish deaths in it, and then successfully fobbed off this fabrication on a gullible world. There is no such thing as "innocent" Holocaust denial. All Holocaust denial is vicious and bigoted.

But denying many things can be vicious and bigoted. If I were to say, for instance, that black slavery wasn't so bad because the slaves were well treated and lived better on southern plantations than they did in Africa, that would be vicious and anti-black. If I were to say that the Japanese deliberately exaggerated the loss of life in Hiroshima to win world sympathy, that would be vicious and anti-Japanese. If I were to say that the Bosnian Muslims supposedly slaughtered in Srebrenice were actually killed in battle with the Serbs, that would be vicious and anti-Muslim. Should there be a law against each of these things? Should there be a million laws for each of the million ways in which it is possible to vicious and bigoted?

But the Holocaust is different, goes the argument. What happened in it is so horrendous that denying it is not like denying anything else.

This strikes me as a very weak argument indeed. Yes, the Holocaust was the most horrendous atrocity committed in the history of humanity. But why shouldn't the second most horrendous atrocity, whatever that was, also be protected by law from would-be deniers? Why not the top ten? Why stop at one?

Moreover, Holocaust denial laws are not only unjustified infringements on freedom of speech, they're counter-productive. It is likely that Holocaust denial would never have grown as astoundingly as it has, to the point that the head of one of the largest, most populated, and most powerful Muslim states in the world has taken to repeatedly championing it in public, were it not for these laws.

This is so because these laws do two things. On the one hand, they encourage the claim that, if the Jews and their allies are so eager to make denial of the Holocaust a crime, they must have something to hide. One only has to consult some the Holocaust denial bloggers on the Internet to see what a popular line of reasoning this is. Why be afraid of a free discussion, they ask, if you believe the truth is on your side? It can only be because the Jews know the truth is against them that they're so afraid to have things aired openly.


Subject: White sportsmanship



Subject: verbal flushings


N.B. Forrest's list of phrases that need to be flushed was pretty good. I'm sure he'll agree, though, that "partnering" should be added to the list.

Douglas Wright

Go to :
Reader Mail Index

Back to VNN Main Page