Reader Mail: 20 February 2006

Need your own server? Need a host for your page? Try Cable Bay.


Subject: House whores

who can suck off Israel the quickest? the Boehner man can!



Subject: Original Dissent changes


Alex, I know you know this..No debate needed, but see the Hugh Lincoln post. He is referring to you.. I would suggest it it was on the bottom of the page or something.. Of course it's too late for polites too, I know, perhaps it just times of living under an alien govt.. Regards Joe


Subject: "the war nobody talks about"

The "War" Nobody Talks About

[And why doesn't anybody talk about it? Because they have been "trained" by our popular culture to not talk about it]:


Subject: Orkin rids your house of termites, carpenter ants, dung beetles, elephants, and jews

Does Your Western Country Have Parasites?

Ed. Note: Great stuff. White parents should use this article to teach their teenage daughters how they're being lied to, and to what end.


Subject: every nigger's an LB, a leftbacker

Duerson pleads guilty in altercation with wife

Former ND trustee, football player's sentencing on domestic battery set for March 14.

SOUTH BEND -- Former University of Notre Dame football player and trustee David R. Duerson, a nigger, pleaded guilty Tuesday to a misdemeanor charge of domestic battery.



Subject: question

Hi Alex, Chain or whoever gets this email.

I have downloaded ALL of the goyfire broadcasts and keep going back to episode 3a and listening to that opening song where a German woman asks, "Hey Ludwig, let's make this party interesting, just you and me...." and breaks into this amazingly beautiful song about "Vaterland, Vaterland....etc." I'd like to know the source of that song so I can buy it!

Can anyone at VNN direct me to that?

I've sent several emails before this (regarding other matters) and have not received a reply. I know you guys are busy, but I'd really appreciate whoever gets this passing it along to someone who can direct me. Great music!!!!!




Subject: the MLK quiz


1) Name the judge who has sealed King's FBI surveillance file until the year 2027.

Answer: The Honorable John Lewis Smith, Jr.

2) According to whose 1989 biography did King spend his last night on earth in an adulterous liaison?

Answer: Reverend Ralph Abernathy. "And the Walls Came Tumbling Down"

3) According to whose 1989 biography did King spend his last morning on earth physically beating a woman?

Answer: Reverend Ralph Abernathy. "And the Walls Came Tumbling Down"

4) Who was the U.S. Attorney General who ordered the FBI to wiretap King?

Answer: Robert F. Kennedy

5) Who was the Assistant Director of the FBI who wrote a letter to Sen. John P. East (R-NC) describing King's conduct of "orgiastic and adulterous escapades, some of which indicated that King could be bestial in his sexual abuse of women."

Answer: Charles D. Brennan

6) Who called King a "hypocrite preacher?"

Answer: President Lyndon B. Johnson

7) What U.S. newspaper reported that King had plagiarized his doctoral thesis at Boston University.

Answer: The Wall Street Journal

8) Whom did King plagiarize in more than 50 complete sentences in his doctoral thesis?

Answer: Dr. Jack Boozer

9) Who was the Chairman of the National Endowment for the Humanities who purposely suppressed knowledge of King's plagiarism of his doctoral thesis?

Answer: Lynne Cheney, wife of Vice President Richard Cheney

10) What was Martin Luther King's real name?

Answer: Michael King, Jr. In 1935 his father, Michael King, declared to his congregation that he wound henceforth be known as Martin Luther King and his son would be known as Martin Luther King, Jr.

11) In his first public sermon at the Ebenezer Baptist Church in 1947 who did King plagiarize?

Answer: Harry Emerson Fosdick

12) Name the man who served as King's personal secretary from 1955 to 1960, had joined the Young Communists League at New York City College in 1936, went to prison for draft evasion in 1944, and in 1953 was sentenced to 60 days in jail in California "lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion."

Answer: Bayard Rustin

13) According to whom had King "privately described himself as a Marxist?"

Answer: His biographer, David J. Garrow

14) Who edited King's book Stride Toward Freedom?

Answer: Communist Stanley Levison

15) Who made the following speech?

That's exactly what we mean-- from every mountain side, let freedom ring.Not only from the Green Mountains and White Mountains of Vermont and New Hampshire; not only from the Catskills of New York; but from the Ozarks in Arkansas, from Stone Mountain in Georgia, from the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia --let it ring not only for the minorities of the United States, but for the disinherited of all the earth--from every mountainside, LET FREEDOM RING!

Answer: Archibald Carey, 1952

1-3 questions correct means you could be dangerous.

4-6 questions correct means you must read too much.

7-10 questions correct means you must value historical correctness instead of political correctness. Congratulations!


Subject: filtering out the truth sites


Subject: essay on race and sex


Interesting essay for those who study race, gender and equality issues:


Subject: end of dollar hegemony

The End of Dollar Hegemony by Ron Paul


Watch Ron Paul's speech on video, before the US House of Representatives, February 15, 2006.



Subject: new ISP

Congratulations on finding an ISP to host your page. I was beginning to wonder if the Jew was going to win on this one. Keep up the good work and godspeed to all your endevours.


Subject: people of turd ghettoize blond, gullible Minnesota

Gook says that today's Turd World immigrants are just like past white immigrants!

Immigrants aren't destroying AmericaDespite what some would have you believe, immigrants are not destroying this nation. Years ago, the same complaints were leveled against Irish, Italian, German, French and Scandinavian communities making their homes in Swede Hollow, Frogtown, Little Italy, Germantown and other ghettos across the country that are today prosperous and vibrant parts of their cities.

The full article will be available on the Web for a limited time:



Subject: our trade deficit with China

Title: Running Chinese Trade Deficits


Subject: new dark Age in europe

Pual Grubach is right. The lights are going to start going out all over Europe and the rest of the western world if we don't stand up to this tyranny right now!!!!!! Yesterday they came for Germar Rudolph. Tomorrow they will come for you.... BCC my list..

Update on Letter Writing/Calling Campaign to German Embassy for Germar Rudolf

Dear Friends,

Just a few days ago we asked all concerned people to write and call the German embassy to protest the German government's persecution and imprisonment of the outstanding Holocaust Revisionist scholar, Germar Rudolf. Because I have been inundated with such positive responses, I feel an update is appropriate.

Mr. Rudolf, a former chemistry doctoral candidate at the prestigious Max-Planck Institute, could have kept silent about the Holocaust controversy and led a very comfortable life in his native Germany. But Germar Rudolf, being the man of courage and high moral principle that he is, saw the outrage against historical truth that this so-called "Auschwitz Gas Chamber" legend really is, and he chose to do something about it. Improving upon the deficiencies of the pioneering "The Leuchter Report," he performed a more thorough and airtight forensic/scientific study of the "Auschwitz Gas Chambers," and showed that they never existed. In a word, Germar Rudolf's expert report is truly the final and ultimate nail in the coffin of the "Auschwitz Gas Chamber" corpse.

Because the present dictatorial German government cannot refute "The Rudolf Report" with logic and reason, they have no other recourse but to imprison Germar; Fascism masquerading as a "German democracy." He faces up to five years in prison for telling the world the truth!

Once again, we appeal to you to write to the German embassy in Washington, DC, and protest to the German authorities about the continued persecution and imprisonment of Germar Rudolf.

Embassy of Germany
4645 Reservoir Road, NW
Washington, DC 20007
Call Now: 202-298 4393

In connection with this calling/letter writing campaign, this issue has been raised. Why bother writing/calling the German Embassy? The German embassy is a part of the problem, not the solution. They undoubtedly played a significant role in getting Germar Rudolf deported to a prison cell in Germany.

This is all 100% correct, and this is precisely why your letters and phone calls on behalf of Germar are now more important than ever. A very reliable source, that has intimate knowledge of the German legal system, informed me that a vigorous letter writing/calling campaign on Germar's behalf will make the German authorities aware that many people are outraged about the "Germar Rudolf affair," and this will prod them to much more cautious in their handling of him.

Indeed, there is evidence to support this assertion. In the 1990s, the Holocaust revisionist activist and writer, Hans Schmidt, was detained by the German authorities. I recall the late Dr. Robert Countess saying that the vigorous letter writing/calling campaign to the German embassy played a role in Hans Schmidt's release.

I hold no illusions about this letter writing/calling campaign for Germar Rudolf. I fully realize that the German authorities will not release Germar because of it.

But the journey of a thousand miles begins with the first step, and the first step in helping Germar Rudolf in particular and the Holocaust revisionist movement in general, is to slam the German embassy right in their face with a flood of letters and phone calls that expose their lies, hypocrisy and wrongdoing.

Paul Grubach

P.S. Germar informed me by mail that he greatly appreciates all mail sent to cheer him up. You can write to him at:

Herrn Germar Rudolf
JVA Stammheim
Asperger-Str. 60
D-70439 Stuttgart


Subject: "Russia these days"


Russia These Days

We just saw a mention of a former Russian state, so we decided to comment on modern Russia as a whole.

Some people in the Western media wonder aloud why modern Russia isn't more successful - after all, Russia and its satellite states are no longer communist countries. Our brief response to that question is two-fold:

1. Maybe modern Russia would be more successful if Jewish communists under both Lenin and Stalin - such as the Soviet official Lazar "The Wolf of the Kremlin" Kaganovich [1] - hadn't spent years murdering most of the smart people there [trivia: Kaganovich died of old age in 1991, never spending a day in prison, despite the fact that he was probably the biggest mass-murderer in history. Contrast that to the executions of top Nazi officials after World War II. Most of those Nazi officials never killed anyone. In fact, one of them, Julius Streicher, wasn't even a government officer but was instead a newspaper publisher. Also note that most Western citizens have never heard of Kaganovich, which says a lot about the media and Hollywood].

2. Modern Russia also experienced "Russian [read: Jewish] oligarchs" after the fall of communism. Many detailed essays have been written about those oligarchs, such as this one: HERE and this one: .

Russia can thank scores of Jews for its current situation - which may explain why "anti-Semitism" is so strong there.


Subject: "The War on...Whatchacallit!"


The War on...Whatchacallit!

This below makes good points about The War on the Enemies of Israel...oops...uh..."The War on Terror."

[Trivia: there was only one time in modern history that America couldn't get oil easily from the Middle East, and that was because of Israel, i.e. the 1973/1974 Arab oil embargo was due to America's support of Israel. So much for the idea that America "has to" support Israel in order to "ensure that we have plenty of oil." In other words, our oil supply is less steady thanks to the Jewish Hate State...and by the way, your non-Jewish tax dollars fund that state]:



Subject: "VNN's Influence"

See Steve Sailer's blog for 2/7/06...


Note the lead sentence in the 4th paragraph from the end:

"A bizarre aspect of the neocon Open Borders mindset, as enunciated by Podhoretz and Tamar Jacoby, is how utterly nostalgia-driven is their is-it-good-for-the-Jews thinking."

If it weren't for VNN, he never would have thought to use the expression "is-it-good-for-the-Jews."

Ed. Note: "Nostalgia-driven"? More like nostalgia-veiled. They argue from their grandparent yiddles but you can rest assured if they believed the 'diversity' 3rd-world invasion brings were bad for jews, they'd be against it. The phrase "good for jews" comes from jews themselves. VNN merely emphasizes it, and places it in the correct context; ie, what is good for jews is nearly 100% of the time bad for goyim - who are called haters if they apply the same measuring stick -- their own racial interests -- jews do. Which is not to disparate the possibility of subtle callback on Sailer's part. WN these days is beginning to evolve a milieu. Highly necessary, itz. There must be support for ISPs (Cable Bay), indie filmmakers (October Sun Films), news sites (a few), unsyndicatd columnists (many), forums (multiple). The less fearful the paleos become, the better. In many, many cases, a WN is just a paleocon who decided not to be a coward anymore. Tom Metzger's claim notwithstanding, racialism is inherently rightist.


Subject: Zundelsite on the trials

Greetings from the Zundelsite:

This is a summary of the three days of hearings in the Holocaust Heresy Trial - February 9, 15, and 16. I held off reporting on it because I had hoped for a more professional, on-location summary from someone like William James who can grasp the overarching topics, principles, tactics, and strategies - not just the actual events. Again, due to e-mail sabotage, I may not have received every write-up from the audience sent to me. Therefore, I am flying by the seat of my pants, so to speak, piecing things together from an admittedly limited and incomplete perspective.

You should know up-front that Ernst is not allowed to communicate to anybody about the trial itself - apparently, not even to me, even though a higher court had ordered that his communication to his wife not be restricted in any way. Secondly, his correspondence overall is severely throttled. Not only is he limited to "two letters" (coming and going) each workday, the correspondence he receives from others is largely limited to postcards from strangers who just send a greeting, sometimes in a language that he cannot read, often not even with a return address. At times, he is given empty envelopes just to underline - what, exactly? Also, his postage stamp allotment has been brutally cut back so that even the "two letters a day" limitation is hampered.

In a way, I am the beneficiary. Ernst writes me absolutely stunning letters, practically every day - cutting down his allotment to others by 50% - letters that are a testimony to his indomitable spirit, every one of which I save for future use. Happily, my letters to him get through in a relatively short time - and in order to make it easier on the censor(s), I remember my good manners and always include a courtesy copy for them!

Ernst is not allowed to utter the word "Holocaust" - he gets around that one by speaking of the "Reizwort" (incendiary word). He is not allowed to comment about Adolf Hitler for fear it might be catching like the flu. He is not allowed to receive anything that could give him intellectual or artistic stimulation, which includes travel brochures and seed catalogs. Any input generally about what is going on politically outside the prison gates he can only gather by reading newspapers that other prison inmates gleefully share, to liven up their boredom, with the political celebrity that's dwelling among them. Wherever he walks in the prison yard, he gathers a tail of followers eager to hear him hold forth - exactly like Jesus, he says.

Physically, Ernst is apparently well taken care of. He has repeatedly commented on the respectful kindness of his guards, and he is allowed to have a radio and CD player, which is a very great comfort to him.

This much by way of a foreword.

Now how to summarize the three days of hearings this month? One has to understand what is playing in Mannheim in order to appreciate the strategy. Germany does not have, and never has had, a Constitution after its defeat in 1945 - a fact that is not known to most people. Instead, the BRD/Bundesrepublik has something called a "Basic Law", which seems to be a carbon copy of what rules Israel - in itself an interesting comment on this camouflaged colony of Israel's called "Germany".

I will not reiterate the history of why a Constitution was denied so far to the German people, partly because I am not familiar with all the ins and outs. On paper, the BRD was installed in 1945 as an interim government that would expire as soon as the people would be able to elect a government to their needs and liking. At least that was the promise - and it is even nailed into the record through speeches in the German parliament. The way I read the tea leaves, this lacking Constitution was promised to the German people intermittently, allegedly as soon as they were politically "mature" enough to "deserve" a Constitution - in other words, as soon as they were all "re-educated" to atone in perpetuity for their forefather's infernal conduct in wartime.

Now this "Basic Law" is unctuously proclaiming on paper that Germany is a "democracy". It includes a lofty provision for Freedom of Speech and Assembly. However, the "Holocaust" is held to be so utterly "self-evident" that there has got to be an exception to prove a worthy rule, and therefore, a statute called Paragraph 130 was spawned. It is swung by obliging judges like a club against those who dare "sin" against anybody who, in parlance, who "defames the memory of the dead" and "incites the people" with questions challenging the Holocaust.

"Legally", as Germany exists today, a defense based on facts and evidence that would show up the Holocaust as the concocted monstrosity it is, is utterly impossible - and immediately brutally clubbed down by judges who are willing to please. Attorneys who try to defend those who run afoul of Paragraph 130 by conducting themselves according to globally accepted standards of justice merely endanger themselves of contravening Paragraph 130. To paraphrase Orwell, all German people have free speech, but some have more free speech than others - just as nobody's dead must be defamed, but most can be defamed, as long as some are shielded.

The argument the Zundel Team is making is within these legally existing and restricting parameters. Since Paragraph 130 exists, a direct defense is, therefore, not in the cards. The strategy is not, as I understand it, to show that the Holocaust didn't happen and couldn't have happened as claimed, because science, especially forensic science, doesn't support any of the conventional claims - the Zundel defense strategy is to show up Germany as lawless and controlled by an agenda that merely serves Israel. Not Germany!

Thus, the Zundel legal team treats the judicial setup as an enemy fortress and the judge and prosecution as "willing executioners" in the service of an alien power. Ernst's freedom under this strategy has become secondary - almost, it seems to me at times with that horrid sinking feeling in my stomach, irrelevant in the grand design of things. The aim is not so much to free Ernst Zundel from prison by showing that what he said was justified, and that he acted on the dictates of his conscience - the aim is to find allies within the judicial system who will remember they are Germans and not useful idiots to Israel, and who will refuse to convict according to Paragraph 130. If Paragraph 130 can be made to land on the garbage heap of history where that abomination belongs, then patriotic people need no longer fear to speak the truth as they know it.

Vastly simplified, the Zundel Heresy Trial has now become the vehicle to try to shake off Israeli (and Allied) control of Germany, and hopefully of Europe. Ernst has become the symbol and political icon of that struggle because he is the best-known Prisoner of Conscience in the Western world and his name carries weight and prestige with important dissidents who have put the mosaic together and refuse to live by the Lie.

Recently, there have been cracks in the judiciary itself in that judges have begun to speak out against this absurd situation of claiming "freedom of speech" when, in fact, they are required to shred every attempt of freedom of speech the moment Jewish interests come calling. Some have described this new phenomenon as a "paralysis" in the judiciary - in that Paragraph 130 complaints are dismissed outright or, if charges are brought, the system is dragging its feet to convict.

In response, the Enemy of Free Speech, via what I call the "Poodle Media" - a phrase I'd like you to adopt - is shooting out of every barrel. Mainstream media folk have attacked with a blizzard of defamatory Zundel articles world-wide, but even there are cracks in that the more alert reporters are beginning to resent having to spew the words that someone puts into their mouths, and they have found ways of sliding in the real issues by letting people read between the lines. In Europe, mainstream media, generally, is not as viperous as the Canadian scribblers, for instance. The German articles that I have seen slyly let shine through what really plays in Mannheim!

There are six attorneys making up the defense - three of our own, and three assigned by the government, ostensibly as "public defenders", whose duty is, as you and I surmise, to spy on strategy and move the trial to a speedy conclusion and conviction. Now it so happens that one of these three "public defenders" is Dr. Bock, a most distinguished, white-haired gentleman whom we consider as being on our wavelength due to his long and vigorous defense of other defendants who transgressed against Paragraph 130. That leaves two dismayed fellows who "don't enjoy the trust of Mr. Zundel," as it was pointed out by one of the Zundel attorneys in one of the hearings. They sit behind the main team, out of earshot, fuming!

A young, attractive lady, Sylvia Stolz, is the lead Zundel attorney - a genuine Magnolia beauty hiding a spine of steel. From all I heard, Dr. Meinerzhagen, the judge in this trial, is no match at all against Attorney Stolz. She refuses to address him by title. He looks and acts apoplectic. When he talks, she talks, too - parallel. When he pulls the cord to prevent her from speaking, she turns around and addresses the audience directly. She is described as superbly unruffled and sweetly in control. She bests him with every move.

To the glee of the courtroom spectators, Dr. Meinerzhagen has lost his cool. When an elderly woman laughed loudly at some of the point-counterpoint sparring, he ordered her up front and lectured an old lady as though she were a kindergartner. When one of Zundel supporters called him a name that wasn't his name - comparing him to a notorious judge in those unmentionable times - he had the man arrested on the spot and thrown in jail for 4 days. When, after the hearing was over, a spontaneous Singing Quartet in the audience launched the first verse of "Deutschland über alles" - certain verses forbidden by Germany's vigilant censors, even though it is a song with a long, distinguished history that was not dreamed up by the Wicked Regime - Meinerzhagen fined the would-be Barbershoppers 200 Euros apiece - a fine that was immediately collected in the audience by disbarred Attorney Mahler passing the hat. It was like in the olden days in Toronto - the only prop missing were the yellow helmets worn by the old-time dissidents.

For the second time, Dr. Meinerzhagen has thrown in the towel and cut the hearing short, but not before telling Ms. Stolz that he is going to initiate an investigation into her irreverent conduct. This brave young woman could well end up in jail herself, which would only underline the camouflaged dictatorship that really rules the Fatherland. Remember Roosevelt's suggestion: "Speak softly and carry a stickS"? That's what's been going on in Germany for 60-plus years, and now the genie is out of the bottle.

So that's where we are today. Five hearing days have passed - and the only thing accomplished was that the charges were read against Ernst - listlessly, I have been told. Ernst listens to all this commotion, quite calm and unperturbed, as is his style in general. He knows that he can't win under the current system. The system is stacked against Truth, and he has known that all along. It would be sweet justice if he could take the trophy of the defeated Paragraph 130 back home to Tennessee where I would pin it up for all the world to see in the museum on the mountains that Ernst and I had planned.

Ernst wants you to know that this Holocaust Heresy Trial is only the beginning of what is going to transpire on the soil of the Old Continent. As he has put it in one of his letters to me: "They'll rue the day yet when they deported me to Europe!" P.S. Below is a typical Poodle article from the Deutsche Presse Agentur:


Courtroom uproar mars neo-Nazi trial in Germany

16 February 2006

MANNHEIM, GERMANY - A German neo-Nazi's trial degenerated into uproar Wednesday as the judge jailed a member of the public for contempt and warned a far-right defence lawyer she could be thrown out of court.

Supporters filled the court as Ernst Zuendel, 66, appeared for a second day on charges of incitement to racial hatred for denying the Holocaust, which Zuendel's books and website claim never happened.

Presiding judge Ulrich Meinerzhagen on Wednesday imposed 200-euro (240-dollar) fines for contempt on three men who sang a nationalistic version of the German national anthem in court last week.

When a member of the public slurred the judge by shouting a remark that compared him to a senior Nazi-era judge, the man was sentenced to four days in detention for contempt.

Sparring with Zuendel's defence lawyer, the judge told her, "You are sabotaging this trial," and switched off her microphone. When she kept talking, he threatened to throw her out of court.

Zuendel's lawyers accused the court of being "anti-German".

Zuendel, who has been in detention since his expulsion from Canada last March, was silent Wednesday. He had lived in North America since 1958, but as a German national, he can be charged for offences committed abroad.


Subject: $2000 gold?

Broker Cheuvreux Ponders $2,000/oz Gold

RENO--( In a January 30th sector report, the Parisian international security broker Credit Agricole Cheuvreux raised its mid-cycle gold price estimate from $750/oz to $900/oz, suggesting the possibility gold could climb to $2,000 an ounce and higher.


Subject: rebutting the Butz-haters

10,000 REWARD: IF THE HOAX of the TWENTIETH CENTURY Contains an anti-Semitic Remark...

Michael Santomauro, the president of Theses & Dissertations Press and the publisher of the following will pay $10,000 if any sentence in the writings of Prof. Butz's book, THE HOAX of the TWENTIETH CENTURY, contains an anti-Semitic remark as the opinion article in the Chicago Tribune suggests. (See below). The opinion article was Published February 19, 2006 titled: A disavowal of absolutely no value, by Gary Tobin, president of the San Francisco-based Institute for Jewish & Community Research.


To claim any sentence in Prof. Butz's book, THE HOAX of the TWENTIETH CENTURY, to be anti-Semitic for the above reward it must be submitted in thesis form. Theses should be footnoted and referenced. Each must satisfy the president of Theses & Dissertations Press and will become the property of Theses & Dissertations Press, to be posted on the website of:


Cheap shots at Arthur Butz


Gary Tobin's Opinion attack on Professor Arthur Butz (Feb. 19) literally reeks with the hatred he claims to oppose. Tobin assures us that Butz's criticisms of the Holocaust stories are beyond the pale of civilized discourse and that he should be dismissed from the University as his offense is similar to one involving sexual misconduct or failing to execute his teaching responsibilities. Furthermore, according to this raging assailant Butz's motives are anti-Semitism and the promotion of "untruths" and "hateful rhetoric."

As is now usual with critics of Butz no evidence for any of these charges is provided. Tobin wants us to believe that all these insults have been established by others or are established merely because Butz holds certain opinions about historical events that Tobin does not favor. No need to go into the evidence. In fact, the last thing the Tobins of the world want is an examination of the evidence as you will see.

Arthur Butz is indeed a Holocaust revisionist. In this he is not alone. This means that he questions certain claims of those who promote the Holocaust canon which has become a quasi (or maybe not so quasi)-religious political and cultural dogma in our country and in much of the West. In parts of Europe people are jailed and fined for raising doubts about any facet of the dogmas and in Germany are punished doubly if they attempt to show that their views are correct. Up to now I thought that this was not our way in the United States but on reading hysterical screeds such as that of Tobin now I'm not so sure.

In any case, just what is this "truth" which Tobin claims Butz violates? He never tells us. Apparently it's the whole Holocaust thing. Just about anything the promoters say. Is it the famous "six million" victims? Not likely, as even the most reputable Holocaust promoters now concede to lower numbers. Is it the "four million, mostly Jews" killed in the Auschwitz gas chambers? No, not likely either since that number has now been officially reduced to 1.5 million a nd in fact is still going down (without any reduction of the famous 6 million total by the way which appears routinely in the press). Is it the Auschwitz gas chambers themselves, now conceded to be a postwar rehab after years of telling us they were original and without any evidence of gas residue? Is it the "Jewish soap" stories, now conceded as false communist propaganda? I could go on. These are the very things that revisionists claim and for which they are slandered and imprisoned by the likes of Tobin.

There's something wrong here. Real truth does not have to be defended this way. "Quaecumque Sunt Vera" indeed.

Very truly yours,

Albert Regan Doyle, Esq.


A disavowal of absolutely no value

By Gary Tobin, president of the San Francisco-based Institute for Jewish & Community Research and co-author of "The Uncivil University: Politics and Propaganda in American Education."

Published February 19, 2006

Northwestern University President Henry Bienen has upbraided tenured engineering professor Arthur Butz for his repugnant embrace of Holocaust denial. For that, the academic community and the American public should be grateful. Leadership in America's universities on basic moral issues is sometimes slow and sometimes absent, especially when it comes to calling anti-Semitic speech by its real name.

Yet Northwestern's public disavowal of Butz may have too limited value. Butz has been an active purveyor of Holocaust denial for decades. He uses his university-sponsored Web site to further the goal of saying that the Nazis did not actually murder millions of Jews. Northwestern says it can take no further action against Butz because he has tenure and because he confines his teaching and curriculum work to his work in electrical engineering, his actual academic responsibility.

Is that really so?

Do universities such as Northwestern really have no power when faced with such morally repugnant employees?

The answer clearly is no. Were Butz a gay-baiter, or if he said slavery was a moral and economic good, or if he doubted the intellectual capacities of women, he would certainly face more than a tersely worded press release.

Professor Butz denies what is true, invents what is not, and does so in order to vilify an entire group. Yet at Northwestern, such blatant level of ignorance and racism is protected under the banner of "the vital principle of intellectual freedom that all academic institutions serve to protect."

Let us examine that defense.

No other industry would use its basic principles to undermine the purpose for which it is pledged. Put another way, if another industry, say, medicine, played host to a quack who killed his patients, his license would be pulled. If a lawyer put his clients in constant legal jeopardy, he would be disbarred.

And so on a university campus, if somebody deliberately distorts the truth for the sheer purpose of destroying the truth, he should be fired.

For those who would hide behind the mantle of academic freedom and hold up their tenure as a shield, I remind them that tenure was designed to protect the honest pursuit of truth, unencumbered by political coercion. It is not a pass to promulgate bigotry and historical falsehoods. Tenured faculty can be fired for sexual misconduct or for failing to execute their teaching responsibilities; Butz's transgressions are no less a violation of his contract with the university, and therefore his contract should be terminated.

Northwestern has gone to great pains to distance itself from professor Butz. The university has been solicitous of Jewish donors, asking them to counter his hateful rhetoric by funding special programs and faculty positions for Holocaust studies. This they have done, in multiples of millions of dollars.

And yet Butz continues to draw his paycheck, teach his class, and tell the world that the gas chambers of Auschwitz were a lie, that the mass graves at Babi Yar were a lie and that Dachau, Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, Treblinka were all lies.

Northwestern's motto is "Quaecumque Sunt Vera"--Whatsoever things are true. It is derived from St. Paul, who said: "Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things are honest, whatsoever things are just, whatsoever things are pure, whatsoever things are lovely, whatsoever things are of good report; if there be any virtue, and if there be any praise, think on these things."

Think on these things, Northwestern. Think not of the souls whose memory and murder your professor Butz denies.


Arthur R. Butz: The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry

The first book to treat the central questions of the Holocaust allegation -- the evidence for a German extermination program, for mass killings by poison gas, and for the deaths of some six million Jews -- with academic rigor, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century created Holocaust revisionism as a discipline with its appearance in 1976.

Few professional historians could have devised the brilliant investigative strategy that is central to The Hoax: author Arthur Butz's focus on the information long available to the Allies on the operations of Auschwitz, a strategically important petrochemical center (Butz correctly surmised the existence of U.S. aerial photos of the camp years before it was admitted). The Hoax's several chapters on the question of Allied knowledge of Auschwitz have busied orthodox experts for nearly three decades with trying to explain how mass operations seem to have gone unnoticed for several years -- to no avail. The Hoax remains at the center of the revisionist inquiry, valuable even in those few areas in which it has been superseded by subsequent revisionist research: a book that, especially in this handsome new design and printing, needs to be read, and re-read, then read again, by every serious thinker.

This new edition comes with several supplements adding new information gathered by the author over the last 25 years.

US $25.00 506 pp ., 6"Å~9", pb., ill., bibl., index (3rd edition 2003), ISBN: 0967985692, ISSN: 1529-7748

You can place your order at:


Subject: The New Jew Dark Ages Cover Europe

Nation-States Gone Wild: The Persecution of David Irving

Monday, February 20, 2006

Will the European governments that ban any talk about the Nazis not having murdered 6 million Jews start rounding up the newspaper editors who published the Muhammad cartoons and start putting them on trial for crimes against Islam? European governments and their media mouthpieces appear to use the mantle of free speech to justify publishing supposed insults against Muslims. But what about the free speech rights of people who dare to go against conventional thinking of Nazi atrocities committed against Europe's Jews?

These Holocaust deniers, revisionists and skeptics don't have any rights to free speech in many European countries (and Canada), unlike their brethren who dare to publish images of the Prophet Muhammad but don't face criminal charges. David Irving now must spend the next three years in prison for giving two speeches in Austria in 1989. Ernst Zundel faces up to five years in prison for publishing his opinions on the Zundelsite website while living in Canada.

Should people who downplay the Confederate States of America's treatment of slaves and the U.S. government's treatment of Native Americans face criminal charges? Should the people who publicly contend that the U.S. government was justified in killing hundreds of thousands in Hiroshima and Nagasaki face criminal charges? Should the people who deny the wickedness of the U.S. invasions of Vietnam and Iraq faces criminal charges? Should the people who deny the wickedness of Israel's conduct against Palestinians face criminal charges? Of course not!

We are dealing with a simple yet extremely dangerous case of nation-states gone wild. Instead of addressing their complicity in modern-day atrocities—such as providing either unabashed logistical support for or tacit approval of the U.S. government's crimes around the world—these governments arrest people for public speech.

Irving, Zundel and others who face criminal charges of “denying the Holocaust” have not committed violence against anybody. They have not given orders to soldiers to invade and occupy another country. They have not given orders to police or soldiers to arrest and imprison individuals without charges. They have not given approval to secret police, soldiers or prison guards to torture individuals.

Irving, Zundel and others have expressed their opinions about one of the most despicable periods in our world's history. These expressions might anger people. But these people are not in positions of power today that would give them the means to implement policies that mimic the conduct of the Nazis.

Today, the leaders of liberal democratic governments are the ones with the authority (and police and military firepower) to mimic selected policies of the Nazis and the policies of other notorious regimes in our world's history without fear they will face the consequences of their deadly actions.

If one does not like what some people might say or write about the Holocaust, then that person should ignore it. If one does not like images of the Prophet Muhammad published in newspapers, then that person should ignore them.

What we should not ignore is when nation-states, with their monopoly on violence, lock up people for expressing their opinions about government atrocities committed 60 years ago. More important, we should not ignore the fact that the governments that are locking up individuals for speaking their mind about the actions of the Nazis are the same governments aiding and abetting (or refusing to denounce and stop) the atrocities committed today by the world's only superpower and its confederates. -Mark Hand



Subject: Holohoax cartoons

HollowCost cartoons:



Subject: flush twice - itz a long way to MTV's teleprompter

Verbal Shit That Needs Flushing II: The Revenge.....

1. "THAT'S What I'm Talkin' About!": Shrieked by dirtnap-worthy whiggers after come-from-behind winning hands in televitzed poker tournaments, etc.

2. "Shut up!": Not as a demand for immediate silence, but as an idiotic expression of disbelief-elation mouth-farted by "sk8r boi" clowns who paint their fucking nails black (go the whole hog and make it bubblegum pink, assholes - you won't look a bit faggier than you do right now).

3. "Hellll-LO??!": "......'n' Zachary fucking spazzed out when I told him I wuz leaving him for D'Alphonso, crying 'n' begging me not to, then going off 'n' callin' me a nigger-lovin' whore 'n' shit, 'n' I wuz like " 'Phonso's cock is twice as big as urs, you racist fuck! Hellll-LO??!' "

4. Statements Spoken As Questions: Stoopid, insecure bitches usually the culprits of this yapcrime. "I went to the salon and had my roots touched up today? Sebastian wasn't his usual gossipy self - real quiet? I was hoping he'd dish the usual dirt, so I asked him what was wrong? Tears welled up in his eyes and he told me he has a real bad case of anal warts so he can't take it 'up there' any more? So, we cried a little, and I left him a big tip?"

5. "SO....": Itz dem mindless heffas yet again! "He wants to take me out again. That is SO not happening...."

N.B. Forrest


Subject: "What is freedom?"


1. FREEDOM is living in a community of one's own kind, one's own folk and one's own race.

2. FREEDOM is being able to belong to a group of related persons which is not diluted by alien elements.

3. FREEDOM is being able to avoid seeing aliens around oneself.

4. FREEDOM is knowing that aliens will not compete for the material goods of one's own land, now or in the future.

5. FREEDOM is knowing that one's living space and that of one's descendants will not have to be turned over to aliens.

6. FREEDOM is being able to avoid alien influence and alien control.

7. FREEDOM is being governed by responsible members of one's own people.

8. FREEDOM is having a government which seeks to enable a people to defend its territory.

Reprinted from the Norwegian newspaper FOLK OG LAND, 1974


Subject: jewoprop hurts White girls


Another example of what jewish "civil rights" and their "media" have done to influence our girls.

Researcher takes on rise in girls' violenceChild psychologist and researcher Dr. James Garbarino has an Alan Greenspan kind of hold on parents, social workers and violence-prevention experts in the criminal justice system. When he talks, people sit up and listen.

Researcher takes on rise in girls' violence


Child psychologist and researcher Dr. James Garbarino has an Alan Greenspan kind of hold on parents, social workers and violence-prevention experts in the criminal justice system. When he talks, people sit up and listen. If there was any lingering doubt, it was quickly dispelled for local folks arranging Garbarino's scheduled visit and lecture Wednesday in St. Paul.

"We initially had a room set aside that would hold 300 people,'' said Donald Gault, manager of St. Paul-Ramsey County Department of Public Health's healthy communities section. "We only sent out an online flier, but 600 people registered in the first week.'' The number of expected attendees swelled last week to 1,400, forcing organizers to hold the free event at the College of St. Catherine's O'Shaughnessy Auditorium.

Garbarino, who holds the Maude C. Clarke Chair in Humanistic Psychology at Loyola University in Chicago, has spent 30 years studying and addressing the root causes of juvenile violence and aggression. His critically well-received 1999 book, "Lost Boys,'' expertly dissected the cultural, physiological and psychological factorsdriving much of the rise in juvenile violence and aggression among boys. He has done much the same for his new book and the main reason for the interest in his visit, "See Jane Hit: Why Girls are Growing More Violent and What We Can Do About It'' (Penguin Press, 2006), which arrivesin bookstores today.

The statistical stepping-off point for the book is the fact that 25 years ago, one girl was arrested for assault for every 10 comparable male juvenile offenders. That ratio now stands at one girl for every four boys. One of Garbarino's main points in the book is that the troubling trend actually is a negative consequence of a very good thing: the rise of female empowerment and physical self-assertiveness through sports and social equalization. In fact, the athletic gender ratio seems to parallel the violent one: 30 years ago, 10 times as many boys participated in sports than girls. The numbers, he points out, are now almost equal. Why are more girls going "bad"? Well, it's never as simple as that, as Garbarino explained in prepared statements and a follow-up phone interview last week:

Q. What's driving the rise in violent female aggression?

A. First off, girls always had the raw materials to become physically aggressive. Studies have shown that in the first two years of life, both boys and girls are equally physically aggressive. But traditionally, the clear and strong message from society was that it wasn't "lady like'' to hit. And so there was a suppression of that side of behavior in conflict resolution, in favor of a subtler, more verbal approach.

What's changed in the last 20 years or so — through participation in sports and other physical activities — is an erosion of those cultural factors that suppressed that physical aggression. And that is good, because it has opened up more of the world for them. But in human ecology, one event can have many different consequences, and some are negative, like the violence.

Q. You write that we may be witnessing a tipping point in the changing nature of physical aggression in girls.

A. A tipping point occurs when small changes have accumulated to the point at which their combined weight results in a dramatic shift. When it comes to girls and aggression, I see several areas of special concern.

First, troubled girls are becoming ever more violent, against others and against themselves. Second, as a whole generation of girls arrives in adolescence that has grown up on violent female role models in the mass media, we will need to pay special attention to issues of physical aggression in adolescent peer relations. At present, few schools are doing this.

Third, as aggressive athletics become the norm for girls, we will need to prepare coaches and parents to address the character education issues that we have as a society highlighted in boys, namely the importance of a "code of honor" on the playing field and court.

Q. You point to "social toxicity" as one of the factors in the epidemic of violence. Would you explain what "social toxicity" is and how it affects girls today?

A. Social toxicity is a way of thinking about the degree to which the social environment of kids is benign or healthy versus poisonous and destructive. Just as PCBs, lead and pollution can harm kids' well-being and development, so, too, can cultural and social poisons like racism, sexism, media violence and shallow materialism, particularly (in) psychologically vulnerable kids.

Our mass media saturate kids and teenagers with provocative images that link violence, sex and materialism for girls. This is the context in which the changes in girls' physical aggression are occurring.

Q. What can be done to address this issue?

A. Well, we have a lot of trouble already dealing generally with the problem of violence in our society. We haven't really come to grips with violence and aggression in males, and now we have to do it for females.

I believe the greatest impediment would be to treat this physical aggression as some weird anomaly, and not as a more general characteristic of the kids we are working with. Physical aggression in girls has become a fact of life in America for good and bad, and we have to adjust to that in the way we deal with them.

Besides empowerment and gender-specific programming, Garbarino also strongly believes spiritualism can serve as a potential antidote to violent thinking and behavior.

"I think that, ultimately, the most successful programs have a spiritual orientation,'' he writes in the new book. "If I had to identify one element in the boys who kill I have known, it would be a spiritual emptiness. This spiritual isolation makes them a high-risk group in a socially toxic environment because it gives them nothing to resist the allure of the dark side of human experience. …''

I hear you, doc.

Rubén Rosario can be reached at or 651-228-5454.


Subject: 16th Amendment's dubious foundation


The Law that Never Was

Is the 16th Amendment bogus?


Subject: "Holocaust" fabulists, aka reality-haters


Don't confuse us with the facts!

"These Holocaust deniers are very slick people. They justify everything they say with facts and figures."

-- Steven Some, Chairman,
New Jersey Commission on Holocaust Education
Newark Star-Ledger, Oct. 23, 1996 (p. 15)


Subject: "holocaust" "denial" laws


"Holocaust Denial" Laws, or, Let's Sit on our Asses While Jews Remodel the West

Question: who built the West - you know, the Western countries? The answer is: White people. America, France, Britain, Germany, Sweden - Whites built those countries into what they are today.

Another question: who installed, via political pressure, the first laws in the West which banned the mere questioning of a historical event? The answer is: non-Whites, i.e. Jews, who pushed for "Holocaust denial" laws, even though most "Holocaust deniers" don't deny the matter but merely question certain features of it [1].

Of course, we only have White people to blame for those laws, don't we? After all, Whites sat around watching TV shows and eating donuts for 40 years while Jews set up shop in all of the Western "democracies" while using fancy slogans like "anti-racism" and "anti-hate" as cover for their freedom-stealing ideas. Now the White people in those "democracies" have lost most of their rights [e.g. free-speech rights, private-property rights] and yet they wonder why. Want more donuts, Whitey, or have you had enough?

As someone once said: you can have freedom, or Jews. Not both.

[1] for example, France's 1990 Fabius-Gayssot law, which came from Jewish politician Laurent Fabius:


Subject: Hoffman on Irving conviction

Michael A. Hoffman II, Editor


Feb. 20, 2006 |

VIENNA --Dissident historian David Irving was sentenced to three years' imprisonment in Austria today for casting doubt on Nazi homicidal gas chambers in his writings and speeches.

Mr. Irving's guilty plea was viewed as insincere by the judge. Here is a report from an Austrian newspaper (

English language translation: "The confession did not strike us as repentant and was therefore not important in determining the sentence." On the other hand repeated acts of violation and the unique position occupied by Irving among right extremists weighed heavily against him. 'He is not a run of the mill Neo-Nazi. Here you have a man who in his function as a historian, has abused a role in the forefront of opinion molding."

A distinguished historian will serve three years behind bars for dissenting from the Allied orthodoxy about the war

by Michael A. Hoffman II

Since when is the role of the historian to uphold the dogma of the state? The Austrian court's logic is Soviet.

This sentence underscores, yet again, why the Iranians will not take lessons in democracy from the West.

Irving is a military historian of great competence and renown. Even the judge in the Lipstadt trial admitted as much. Yet he is on his way to the Gulag.

The anti-Muslim cartoon publisher Flemming Rose of Denmark, faces no similar fate. Nor should he. But Irving's goal has never been cheap sensation. One cannot know World War Two in the European theater without reading Irving.

There is freedom in Europe only to mock Islam, to deny the Dresden holocaust and whitewash Israeli war crimes. There is no freedom to mock Judaism, to doubt the Auschwitz gas chambers or prosecute Israelis for their war crimes.

At least the inquisition of old admitted what it was. The new inquisition is far more dishonest.


Subject: David Irving

Irving Is Highly OverRated By "Revisionists"

(Apollonian, 19 Feb 06)

David Irving's recent pleading guilty and pretending he now changes his mind about holohoax to effect, gee whiz, it ("holocaust") really happened, is not as significant as WHATEVER THE ACTUAL EVIDENCE IS, pls note. Irving just says he saw some, not saying what it really is, and now changes his mind. D. Irving is actually a grandstander who likes to go about "lecturing" on "real history," charging exorbitant fees. In truth, Irving seems to be quite a bit of a hack, profiteer, and charlatan, "changing his mind" by way of inciting and exhorting potential publicity for "lecture" audiences of his. Ck for more serious info upon Irving--he's weak, including scholarship. More significant holohoax heresy trial is German regarding Ernst Zundel ( Internet is ultimately fatal to holohoax. Honest elections and Death to the Fed.

Apollonian, combat-scholar/theologian, part-time exorcist, Christian patriot

Ed. note: Irving is a real historian. He is an excellent speaker, and the things he talks about are fascinating. The jews can jail him, but they can't hurt him. He is the only one who can do that, and by recanting the truth about the promotional campaign called 'the Holocaust,' he did.


Subject: Bryanna

Alex, I know you must have checked out that chick Bryanna over at the dead deer site. She sounds like she's about an inch away from WN. With every column she's more radical, even capitalizing "White" which nobody over there does. Perhaps expecting a blatantly anti-semitic column is too much, but it sure is refreshing to see a young woman take a racialist position. It woudn't surprise me at all to find out she's a VNN reader.

Ed. Note: Actually, she's one I'm not familiar with. I know she's with Vdare, but I've only seen a couple things she's written. I'm glad to hear she's radicalizing. Over time, everything moves VNNward! If radicals get to the root, and if jews are the root of the problem, how does speaking in codes help solve the problem? It doesn't. Codes are ways for the superior power to hide its intentions from the oppressed. We the oppressed have nothing to gain from going along with the code that substitutes 'secular humanist' or 'liberal' or 'atheist' for KIKE YID JEW. It is the most telling fact in politics that nothing, absolutely no term devisable by man, subhuman, or parasite can perfume the jew. The stink is too strong. And that is why jews always respond as if they've been insulted when you call them what they are - jews. Oh, a jew is a jew is a jew jew jew! Jew jew jew jew, JEW JEW JEW JEW, jew jew jew jew, JEW JEW JEW JEW. My point is simple and true: 10,000 paleonuantics aren't worth a single line consisting of nothing but repetition of the term for our one and abiding enemy - the goddam JEW.


Subject: Oregon real estate

Alex, I see more white men alone hitchhiking on the highway every day of course when you on road you do become dirty and do become crazy living that alone.


Post number 10 is two sentences about N.Z. 1999 banks. I am tortured as what to do, after suffering a rip off, and the real-estate has every NPR/TV bastard buying overpriced homes and them buying all they can around along with the Real-ass agents who buy all the deals that come in the door and re-sale. The real estate busines in Oregon is criminal and smashing whites who are not coming here with a million. 300 k, will now buy you a shack that was priced at a 100K 2004, Best Joe


Subject: Irving

Timeline: David Irving's battles

David Irving is on trial in Austria facing charges of denying the Holocaust. The BBC News website looks back at his controversial career.

2006: As he arrives in a Vienna court on 20 February Mr Irving tells the BBC that he will plead guilty. He acknowledges that millions of Jews died in World War II.


Subject: Glenn Miller LTE

Dear Editor:

Re: News Leader article, "NAACP takes aim at racist newsletter", 19 Feb 06.

It's not a newsletter, it's a 16-page, in color, tabloid newspaper for White folks. And why all the fuss ?? Negroes, jews, and hispanics have hundreds. Can't Whites have at least one ??

Jews claim to be God's chosen people, thus they believe God is a racist. Yet you call us the supremacists. But since God is a racist, then I can be one too. See? God set the racist example.

NAACP head Maddox, said "We don't want to jeopardie freedom of speech", but that he's "hoping to halt distribution" of my newspaper. A blatant contradiction, but helps prove why freedom of speech doesn't work in Africa. Africans and Maddox love their own free speech, but demand censorship of speech they don't like.

The right reverend voiced worry that I and our newspaper, The Aryan Alternative might gain a "platform" and "raise our profile" due to media coverage. Tell him to forget it because I'm filing for U.S. Congress next month; we're increasing distribution of our paper; And I'm blabbing to the media til the fat gal sings, or hell or high water, whichever comes first.

Thanks for allowing my free speech in your paper.

Glenn Miller
Master Sergeant, US Army - Retired,
17209 Lawrence 1220,
Aurora, MO 65808
tel: 417-463-7703
Director of Distributions - Aryan Alternative newspaper


Subject: another fake "hate" crime


Police say hate crime may have been hoax

Associated Press Feb 18, 2006

RICHMOND,Va. - Police investigating a possible hate crime in Powhatan say family members _ not racists _ are responsible for the epithets found on a black family's home. Police found the spray painted slurs at 2780 Ballsville Rd. The family renting the house told police they had come home on Feb. 3 to find an anti-black slur and the phrase "white power" painted on the house. The FBI joined the Powhatan Sheriff's Department to investigate at the request of state leaders of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. But NBC 12 in Richmond reports police now say the vandalism wasn't what it appeared. Police offered no further explanation. But they said the crime apparently was not racially motivated. No charges are expected.


Subject: important world news

Paris: Gang suspected of killing Jew nabbed

The French police arrested 13 people on suspicion of kidnapping, torturing and murdering Ilan Halimi, a 23-year-old Parisian Jew. Halimi was found on Monday tied to a tree, naked and wounded, with burns covering all parts of his body. He died on the way to the hospital. Police officials said that the abduction and murder were apparently not motivated by anti-Semitism, but added that they have not yet discovered what led the group to commit the acts.


Ed. Note: How telling. When he's killed, he's a JEW! When he's alive, puling for multiculturalism to destroy France because diversity is "good for jews," he's a proud Frenchman. The media are controlled by folks who, an objective analysis shows, treat jews as though they are more valuable than non-jews. The rule that conditions literally everything you read and hear from the media is: is it "good for jews" that this information be known/presented in this manner/these terms? If so, it gets printed or played that way; if not, it doesn't. If it's not relevant, as the "U.S." media claims most of the time in murder cases, to print that the suspect is a nigger, how can the race of a VICTIM be relevant? The idea here is to portray those poower jews, victims of hate yet again... Was 6 million not enuf? WAS SIX MILLION NOT ENUF?


Subject: insane bushy

'President's gone insane' – 9/11 dad



Peter Gadiel just doesn't get it. How, asks Gadiel, whose son James died in the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, can a company owned by a terror-linked country get control of our nation's ports? "I'm a lifelong Republican and I think the President's gone insane," said Gadiel, 58, who heads 9/11 Families for a Secure America.

Two of the 19 9/11 hijackers were citizens of Dubai, the Arab emirate whose bid to run ports in New York, New Jersey and four other cities was okayed by the White House even though investigators have found signs that money used to finance terrorism flowed through Dubai banks. "How the hell could this happen?" fumed Bill Doyle, 58, a retired Staten Island stockbroker whose son Joseph also died when the Trade Center fell. "We're not securing our country in any way by selling our ports to foreigners," he said. Gadiel and Doyle stood with Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) yesterday at the harbor to express their outrage.



Butz Versus Lipstadt Pimping Lies

(Apollonian, 19 Feb 06)

[Ed.'s note: This essay (w. slight changes) appeared in response to below-copied by Jew, Lipstadt, fm Daily Northwestern, U. newspaper.]

Thanks to Northwestern, appreciated and talked about even way out west (and south) here in Tucson, Az. The Lipstadt-Butz controversy merely evokes cultural-literary analysis featuring New Testament and the Talmud, objective versus subjective.

Lipstadt protesteth too much. Note Lipstadt so desperately tries to couple Butz to David Irving, a total diversion. But if a murder (holohoax) happens, investigation must take place. Lipstadt must speak to facts and OBJECTIVE REALITY. (JOHN 8:44)

Lipstadt squeals murder--and soooo Pharisaically--the holohoax, goshdarn it. Butz then merely shows evidence of the investigation which Lipstadt denies, calling Butz "insignificant." Well, of course, given the (subjectivist) premise, right? See,,

Lipstadt, Jews, and their oligarchal co-conspirators have evermore controlled Western, formerly Christian cultural fortunes, banking, economics, politics, education, justice, and government throughout the Spenglerian "Decline of the West," from at least French revolution, from different countries, but nowadays through the gre at American Mammon empire (parallel with the Roman during a different cycle of history). And history easily reflects, numerous Jew scholars agree; see Jew Bernard Lazare, "Antisemitism," published in 1894.

This empire additionally features the latest version of special cat's paw and commando hit-squad, the terror state of Israel which murders at will and randomly, last big strike against Americans during 9-11 (See David Ray Griffin's "Why Official Accounts CANNOT Be True"--google).

So Lipstadt says her "team" "found" Irving's to be "tissue of lies"?--but isn't that what Lipstadt (and co-conspirators) paid them to find?--1.75 million buckaroos, as Lipstadt herself admits. Lipstadt, Hillel, Zionists, and an awful lot of Jews too, insist hysterically the "murder" (holohoax) took p lace, but now they don't want to heed to an investigation. Hmmmmmm--do u wonder why and how?

THE TRUTH: For Lipstadt and co-conspirators are really pushing a state-enforced RELIGION, funded by taxpayers, (properly) called holohoax, built upon the corporate mass-media, manned by far predominantly by Jews (who own NY Times, Wash. Post, Newsweek, Fox TV, US News And Business Reports, etc.). See Michael Collins Piper's "The New Jerusalem."

Lipstadt so well demonstrates the CONSPIRACY by which an alien and highly repugnant religion of lies, holohoax, is imposed and enforced upon the Christian American people, at taxpayers' expense, whose Christian monument of Ten Commandments (State Supreme Courthouse in Alabama) is removed and suppressed at behest of Jews and ACLU. Who are these fascist anti-Chri st tyrants?

One "revisionist" theory is this holohoax lie and state-enforced religion is mere DIVERSIONARY COVER for the more practically important Federal Reserve Bank (Fed) COUNTERFEITING scam-fraud. (Ck So while people are diverted upon holohoax, the Fed-scammers are free to manipulate Orwellian "perpetual war for perp. peace." 9-11 is just last episode. Judeo-"Sadducean" conspirators gotta remove Internet next.

Arthur Butz simply stands fast to his classic work, now in its umpteenth triumphant edition, the main theses holding magnificently (ck his website--google search). Art Butz is immensely great hero for honest historians and real scientific history. Holohoax is nothing but hype, purest lies, and idiot mythology, now to be imposed and impressed by the fascist mammonist, imperial oligarchs, the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), Falwell, Robertson, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, et al., the "Sadduceans" of modern-day according to New Testament Conspiracy theory-analytic-template.

CONCLUSION: And besides holohoax false religion also diverts fm attention upon 9-11 conspiracy, just the latest for these criminals and traitors, Lipstadt just another pimp and spokes-flack. U can see more of my essays at or Honest elections and death to the Fed.

Apollonian, combat-scholar/theologian, part-time exorcist, Christian patriot


above essay by Apollonian in reply to below-copied by Lipstadt in Daily Northwestern


Revisionists are full of holes

by Deborah E. Lipstadt, February 20, 2006

McCormick Prof. Arthur Butz has, after many years of total obscurity in anything but the world of Holocaust deniers, once again grabbed headlines. Now Butz claims in the pages of The Daily that the reason people are "reluctant to consider the validity" of Holocaust denial is "fear." Butz would have you believe that legal obstacles have made impossible for deniers to speak their piece. Rot.

I say this with over six years of legal experience defending myself against David Irving, once the w orld's leading Holocaust denier. He sued me for libel for calling him a Holocaust denier in one of my books. He waited until the book appeared in the United Kingdom where the burden of proof is on the defendant. I do not believe history belongs in the courtroom. Historians conduct their battles in scholarly journals and at conferences. Irving thought otherwise and due to the nature of British law I had no choice but to defend myself. Had he won, my books would have been pulped, and his version of the Holocaust would have been declared legitimate.

Rather than face any legal obstacles, Irving freely repeated his -- and by extension Butz's -- arguments in court. The world press reported on them daily. No one faced any legal obstacles. No one was hauled into court except me. I was able to mount an aggressive defense thanks to a defense fund which raised $1.75 million dollars. We hired a "Dream Team" of historians to closely examine Irving's claims abou t the Holocaust. They found his work to be a "tissue of lies."

By the end of my ten-week trial Irving was left looking like the Court Jester. He had called the judge "Mein Fuhrer," a telling slip. When asked by Richard Rampton, my barrister, how he could say Herman Goring "goggled" at a certain exchange, when there was absolutely no evidence that Goring was even at this meeting, Irving declared: "author's license."

On another occasion Irving, whose knowledge of German is impeccable, attributed a mistranslation that rendered the ominous field ovens -- the incineration grids on which the Germans had burned their victims' bodies -- into the utterly benign field kitchens, to the pressure of preparing for the trial at 2 a.m. the previous morning. We pointed out that we had downloaded the same document with the same mistranslation from Irving's Web site two years earlier. Irving replied that he had made the same mistake twice. Such things happened daily as Irving 's claims to be a fastidious historian evaporated.

The judge and two subsequent Courts of Appeal found for me. The judge's choice of words to describe Irving's writings about the Holocaust were unambiguous: "perverts," "distorts," "misleading," "unjustified," "travesty" and "unreal."

Butz, in his column, engages in linguistic tricks. He claims that Timothy Ryback wrote in the Wall Street Journal that "there is little forensic evidence proving homicidal intent" in the ruins of Auschwitz. Butz ignores another portion of Ryback's comment regarding Auschwitz: "these heaps of dynamited concrete and twisted steel are not only historic artifacts but among the few remnants of untainted, forensic evidence of the Holocaust."

Why do we not enter further into "debate" with him? Because debating people who deliberately mislead is like trying to nail a blob of jelly to the wall. There is no end to the matter. If they have no fidelity to the truth how can you debate them? They just make things up as it suits them. There is much left to learn about the Holocaust. However, our research agenda should not be set by people whose arguments are complete fabrications.

Let the likes of Butz and Irving go on making their arguments to neo-Nazis and other deniers. That is their right. Your paper, on the other hand, has no responsibility to print such falsehoods. Now let them all slip into the obscurity they deserve. Deborah E. Lipstadt is a professor of Jewish and Holocaust Studies at Emory University. She can be reached at


Subject: Irving gets three years


'Holocaust denier' Irving pleads guilty in Austria

(Filed: 20/02/2006)

David Irving, the British historian, has been sentenced to three years in prison after pleading guilty to criminal charges of denying the Holocaust.

Irving was arrested in Austria last year

Irving was jailed by a court in Austria based on remarks he made during speeches in 1989. He had admitted making an error but said it was "ridiculous" that he was standing trial for remarks he made 17 years ago. "I made a mistake when I said there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz," Irving told the court in Vienna. "In no way did I deny the killings of millions of people by the Nazis." After the verdict he told reporters he was "very shocked". His lawyer, Elmar Kresbach, said he intended to appeal the decision. "I consider the verdict a little too stringent," said Mr Kresbach. "I would say it's a bit of a message trial." During the trial he expressed sorrow "for all the innocent people who died during the Second World War."

The right-wing historian was arrested in Austria on November 11 last year when he arrived to give a lecture to students. Austrian law states that Holocaust denial is a crime and carries a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. The charges stemmed from speeches Irving delivered in 1989 in the Austrian capital Vienna and in the southern town of Leoben.

Irving has in the past faced allegations of spreading anti-Semitic and racist ideas. He is the author of nearly 30 books, including Hitler's War, which challenges the extent of the Holocaust. He once insisted that Adolf Hitler knew nothing about the systematic slaughter of six million Jews, and reportedly said there was "not one shred of evidence" that the Nazis carried out their Final Solution on such a scale.

He has also questioned the use of large-scale gas chambers to exterminate the Jews, and has claimed that the numbers of those who perished are far lower than those generally accepted. 20 February 2006: Irving facing up to 10 years in jail for 'Holocaust denial'

Ed. Note: A historian plays for the ages, and Irving did serious damage to his reputation by acceding in the lies of the 'Holocaust' mythmongers. Irving often claimed that lack of moral courage is common in Germany, but his own actions, contrasted with men such as Germar Rudolf, suggest that English ought to look in the mirror. It's time for the English to do some introspection, and look at how their mistreatment of Germany has repaid them and the rest of us. The truth is that Germany is the sinned against party, and you have only to compare Hitler's actions at Dunkirk with England's action in Dresden to appreciate the difference between German-nationalist and judeo-Anglo leadership.


Subject: lefty blogger, good stuff

"I'm in favor of the [first] War in Iraq... but I just can't support the Troops." --comedian Bill Hicks

anti-racist lefty, nevertheless great writing, many excellent observations, notes on civil war figures in va/wv region







Subject: 'Kwa psychology

Welcome to Middle-Class Lockdown

Now shut up and buy something

"Take away America's Wal-Mart junk and cheap electronics and what you have left is a mindless primitive tribe and a gaggle of bullshit artists pretending to lead them." -- James "Mad Dog" Howard

When I was a boy on my grandparents' farm in the 1950s the neighbors always banded together to make lard and apple butter, put up feed corn, bale hay, thresh wheat, pick apples, plow snow off roads. One neighbor cut hair, another mended shoes and welded. With so little money available in those days in rural America, there was no way to get by without neighbors. And besides, all the money in the world would not get the lard cooked down and the peaches put up for the winter. You needed neighbors and they needed you. From birth to the grave. I was very lucky to have seen that culture which showed me that a real community of shared labor is possible -- or at least was at one time in this country. And if I ever doubt it I can go up to those hill farms and look into the clouded old eyes and wrinkled visages of the people who once babysat me as a child and with whom I shot my first rabbit and quail.

They are passing quickly now and I drive by more than a few of their graves in the old Greenwood Cemetery when I visit to that place where there are still old men who know how to plow with horses and the women who can chop a live copperhead snake in half with a hoe then go right on weeding the garden. "Yew kids stay 'way from that damned dead snake, ya hear me?"

Fifty years later nobody cans peaches any more, or depends upon a neighbor to cut their hair or get in the hay crop. And fifty years later I found myself in the middle class and softening like an overripe cheese. Given my background, I never guessed I'd see the day when I would be bitching because I could not get Hendricks gin or fresh salmon delivered to my door. (But when you're too drunk to drive or even walk to the supermarket ...). Such is the level of self-insufficiency to which some of us weaker souls devolved.

Whatever the case, we no longer depend upon community and other people around us. We live in our houses, idiotically sited vinyl "Tudor-esque" fuck-boxes with brick facade (sorry Neddie, I just had to steal that lick) which grow bigger each year in order to accommodate our massive asses, egos and collection of goods, and we "order out." Or go shopping for it at the mall. Beyond the need to get laid, there is little real reason to be together with other thinking, feeling adults. We do not need each other to do anything important in our lives, because all those things are performed by strangers, often as not thousands of miles away. Including the sex, if your are an internet porn fan. Which leaves us strangers to the natural human community.

After all, what can we really do together? Consume. Drink. Consume. Talk. Consume tickets to entertainment. Consume. There is little else to do with other human beings in America than consume. So most of our primary life activity is solitary. We drive, do housework, pay bills, watch television... When we do "get together with friends," there is little to talk about, other than one form or another of consumption, consuming music, or movies or whatever. We can not tell each other anything new because we all get the same news and information from the same monolithic sources. At the same time we try to fill the loneliness for a real human community that we have never experienced by calling any group of people who come together in any way a "community." Online community. Planned community. As writer Charles Eisenstein, says in The Ascent of Humanity:

It is a mistake to think that we live ultra-specialized lives and somehow add another ingredient called "community" on top of it all. What is there really to share? Not much that matters, to the extent that we are independent of neighbors and dependent on faceless institutions and distant strangers. Real communities are interdependent." Never in all history has there been such a lonely, inauthentic civilization.

This leaves those few fleetingly concerned Americans alone to momentarily stew over the condition of the world, fester upon national moral issues like squishing brown desert people under tanks -- or building offshore gulags so the sight of naked prisoners being tortured in wire cages will not dampen the consumer confidence index. But ultimately somewhere between the seven o'clock showing of "Law and Order" and the third cocktail, or perhaps after that bracing evening trot around the block in your Land's End shorts with the dogs, the mind settles down to the more relevant issues such as "Do I need a Blackberry, and if so, should I wait for the next generation of technology?"

Still, what about those cages in Gitmo? Or global warming? You and I may presently be yammering our asses off in cyberspace (talk about inauthentic!) about such topics, but most Americans, if they dialogue about those things at all, conduct the dialogue with that voices inside our heads, the one that says: Things cannot be as bad as the alarmists say. They cannot be as bad as I often suspect they are. If there really were such a thing as global warming they would be starting to do something about it. And besides, even if it were true, science will find a way to fix it. If there really were genocide going on in so many places far more people would be concerned. At the same time, every commercial and piece of sports hoopla, every celebrity news item leaves us with the impression that, if we have time and money for such things, then matters cannot be all that bad, can they? If the earth were heating up we would surely notice it. If our soldiers and government agencies were torturing people around the world it would make the news. If millions were being exterminated, it would be more obvious, would it not? Look around. Nobody seems worried. Look how normal everything is every day. Look at your wife and your own family. No one is worried. Things cannot be that bad.

Joe Bageant's little inner voice is like everyone else's. Whenever I shudder at the condition of the republic, whenever I feel its utter absence of community, it scolds me and tells me I am crazy: Nothing is wrong. This is merely the way things are. It has always been this way. You cannot change that. You expect too much. Look at your wife. She's not upset. She wonders why you cannot just go ahead and be happy. What you see around you is normalcy. Take care of your own family. Relax. Buy something. And I do too. Which is why I own nine guitars, though I can only play one at a time, and even then not very well. The voice made me do it. I was bored.

Bored plus anxious. Hell, I could lose my job. I could lose everything. And if I lost my job I would indeed lose everything. Social status, family, the accumulated net worth of a lifetime. Which, believe me, ain't much after two divorces and a run-in with cocaine.

Adding to the anxiety is the lack of evidence that the world needs you or me at all. In this totally commoditized life we are dispensable. Everything is standardized. It really doesn't matter who grows our food or makes our clothing. If we don't make it, it someone else will. If we don't buy it, someone else will. Some other faceless person will step forward to fill in our place. The same goes for the engineers who created this computer and the same goes for your own job. The machine rolls on. With us or without us. Naturally, we have our loved ones and our friends. But increasingly even these relationships are monetized for all classes. Family and leisure activity has become intensely commoditized. Never has there been such a lonely and inauthentic civilization as the American middle class.

Now it took me one helluva long time to claw my redneck self into the middle class and it took me even longer to figure all this out about its inauthenticity. Always one to fuck up right in front of the whole damned world, I loudly declared American middle class life to be a crock of shit and vowed to kiss it off. Go someplace simpler. Run nekkid in the surf in Saint Kitts or smoke pot in Belize. Catch my own damned salmon on the Galician Coast. But whoaaa hoss! This bad news just in: Not only do you have to buy your way into the American middle class through forceful consumption of the lifestyle, but you have to buy your way out of it. I'm serious. Buy your right to live in poverty. Let's say you've managed to get your kids through college one way or another, usually via a second mortgage and loans, and you decide like I did to say: Fuck this. I've done right by my family. Now I've got high blood pressure, a bad back, and a million other stress ailments. I'm overweight and have terrible lungs. Now I want to escape the ever rising cost and stress of playing the game, the grinding chase after enough net worth to feel safe about such things as health care and a safe place to shit. Spend a few years in some warm place blinking at blue, unpolluted sky before I go tits up. To my mind, these are completely understandable sentiments for any reasonable person. But, alas dear hearts, the American middle class is a lockdown facility. One that takes a lot of cash bribes and blackmail payoffs to break out of.

Now making complicated plans just to croak has always seemed rather excessive to me. Millions manage to do it without much planning or the need for highly paid experts. I don't care about financial planners or plans for elder care and such crap in my old age. I'm willing to die wretchedly and maybe even unnecessarily, if doing it the right way means blowing a couple hundred thousand dollars I do not have to buy few extra months drooling and talking out of one side of my mouth following that stroke I so richly deserve, given my debauched life. To hell with health care as we know it in America, which is to say as a tool used to blackmail every working person in this country. Better to work less, own less and escape the plague of blackmailers.

You would think owning jack shit and expecting nothing would allow a guy slightly more freedom from toil, would you not? Yet, even though I never wish to own a car again, or ever own another house, don't care about clothes, could easily live on grains, fruits and vegetables, and am willing to work maybe 20 hours a week at some mindless occupation so long as it does not contribute to the world's misery and doesn't require heavy lifting or good memory, and willing to live in the tiniest of rooms, it's still impossible to do so inside this nation, once you've signed the middle class blood oath. Even if I managed to talk my wife into such a life, this is the one thing I am not free to do in the good old land of the free. In this country, buster, you keep paying the going rate, even if you don't care about going. Like the Cajuns say, you will know when you are dead because the bills will quit coming in.

And so about a year or so ago I swore in print and on the net that I was going to buy a cottage in some warm and simpler place abroad. Someplace VERY cheap that I can go and write and make music with these hands and this tired but willing voice. And I am getting closer to that goal, despite the blackmailers. For starters, I have gotten over the American fetish of ownership -- I can rent a place from some deserving poor native family who needs the income. Maybe build an addition onto their house for them for free. Maybe we can go into business together, a small bodega on a dusty street, mango stand, take in laundry or whatever. I will be the old white guy who lives in the back room, plays banjo and guitar and writes. This is the one promise I intended to keep to myself. I still do.

But I never in my life imagined it would be so hard to escape the various American forms of institutionalized extortion and blackmail. Becoming debt free was the least of it. And having everyone you know and love believe your have slipped your moorings is just the beginning. Meanwhile, you become a Kafkaesque character wondering if you've gone nuts, as you simmer in the ambient wrongness pervading American society and watch the futility of our vast life-consuming program of intense management and control of everything, the money, the bombs, the roads, the retirement fund, the communications, the propaganda, the entire buzzing tower of bullshit so massive as to make Babel look like a chicken coop. And you ask every passing stranger in the shopping mall "Is all this fucking necessary?" Only to discover that you are in an isolation chamber, a vacuum, a void in which no one can hear your voice at all. They are sleepwalking. They are shopping. Shhhh ...

The loss of our human kinship identities has left us to define ourselves by what we own, where we live or what sports teams we support. But even more insidiously, our lost stories of community and kinship are replaced by the work of unseen professionals over the distant horizon. TV and movie producers, the news media and educational establishment. They provide the answer to the most important spiritual kinship and identity question we will ever ask ourselves: Who are my people? Some of the worst people on the planet are ready to answer that question for us in a way that serves their own ends. They stand ready to answer other questions too, such as, where did we come from? Why are we here? They are the cadre of empire's paid professionals who write the history and the news stories that fill the deep need for a "story of the people." The most horrific events of history have nearly always been set in motion by manipulation of this national story.

After a while, it does not matter that the story was manipulated. Deep need for a national story drives most to come to love and accept the story over time. It is the only one they have. And if the story is sufficiently intolerant and mean, we don't care about Iraqi deaths. And we come to love empire and capitalism. Beyond that, many would have become bullies anyway, without any help from the national storyline. They don't value democracy, or the ecology or liberty, but they do believe in authority and discipline. Aw come on! It ain't just Dick Cheney and his pet president Sparky doing all this. At least half the country is loving the queer bashing and the bombing and the god rhetoric. We should quit pretending that a very large portion of Americans are not degraded human beings. They are. Skeptics are welcome to visit me here in the armed and inbred environs of Winchester, Virginia. It no longer matters what or who degraded them. Much time has passed and this is how many Americans have become. Fundamentalist cults abound, both religious and economic. Millions upon millions of Christians live in hermetic worlds of their own, with their own books stores, schools, media. Millions of middle class Americans both conservative and liberal live in suburbs and condos and brownstone row houses completely surrounded by their own kind, all of them worshippers in the American value cult, commodity fetishists. They are differentiated mainly in their own minds and the narratives they have made up for themselves. And of course in their consumption.


Subject: Shappy sounds off

Last Sunday, former Vice President Al Gore spoke before the Jiddah Economic Forum. He told the mostly Saudi audience that the United States had committed "terrible atrocities" against Arabs after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. He stated that Arabs had been "indiscriminately rounded up" and detained in "unforgivable conditions." He criticized America's new immigration policy, which more carefully scrutinizes Saudi visas, explaining, "The thoughtless way in which visas are now handled, that is a mistake." Finally, he concluded, "There have been terrible abuses, and it's wrong. … I want you to know that it does not represent the desires or wishes or feelings of the majority of the citizens of my country."

These are outrageous statements. And the silence from the left is deafening. The Democratic National Committee told me that they had not released a statement regarding Gore's speech and had no plans to do so. The New York Times editorial board, the official outlet of the American left, wrote nary a word about the speech.

It is now considered bad form to criticize those who commit seditious acts against the United States. Challenging the patriotism of a traitor draws more ire than engaging in treasonable activities. Calling out those who undermine our nation creates more of a backlash than actually undermining our nation.

Let us consider, however, the probable consequences of Gore's mea culpa on behalf of the "majority" of his countrymen. No doubt his words will fuel the massive tide of propaganda spewing forth from Muslim dictatorships around the globe. No doubt his words will be used to bolster the credibility of horrific disinformation like the Turkish-made, Gary-Busey-and-Billy Zane-starring monstrosity "Valley of the Wolves: Iraq," which accuses American troops of war atrocities and depicts a Jewish-American doctor (Busey) slicing organs out of Arab victims and shipping the body parts off to New York, London and Israel. No doubt Gore's speech will precipitate additional violence against Americans in Iraq and around the globe.

And Gore is not alone. Much of the language of the "loyal opposition" has been anything but loyal. In September 2002, Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) called President Bush a liar on Saddam Hussein's turf, then added that Hussein's regime was worthy of American trust. On "Face the Nation" back in December, Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) stated that American troops were "going into the homes of Iraqis in the dead of night, terrorizing kids and children, you know, women, breaking sort of the customs of the -- of, of, of historical customs, religious customs …" Howard Dean, the head of the DNC, averred in December that the "idea that we're going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong."

At some point, opposition must be considered disloyal. At some point, the American people must say "enough." At some point, Republicans in Congress must stop delicately tiptoeing with regard to sedition and must pass legislation to prosecute such sedition.

"Freedom of speech!" the American Civil Liberties Union will protest. Before we buy into the slogan, we must remember our history. President Abraham Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas corpus and allowed governmental officials to arrest Rep. Clement Vallandigham after Vallandigham called the Civil War "cruel" and "wicked," shut down hundreds of opposition newspapers, and had members of the Maryland legislature placed in prison to prevent Maryland's secession. The Union won the Civil War.

Under the Espionage Act of 1917, opponents of World War I were routinely prosecuted, and the Supreme Court routinely upheld their convictions. Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes rightly wrote, "When a nation is at war, many things that might be said in time of peace are such a hindrance to its effort that their utterance will not be endured so long as men fight and that no Court could regard them as protected by any constitutional right." The Allies won World War I.

During World War II, President Franklin D. Roosevelt authorized the internment of hundreds of thousands of Japanese-Americans, as well as allowing the prosecution and/or deportation of those who opposed the war. The Allies won World War II.

During the Vietnam War, the Supreme Court repeatedly upheld the free speech rights of war opponents, whether those opponents distributed leaflets depicting the rape of the Statue of Liberty or wore jackets emblazoned with the slogan "F--- the Draft." America lost the Vietnam War.

This is not to argue that every measure taken by the government to prosecute opponents of American wars is just or right or Constitutional. Some restrictions, however, are just and right and Constitutional -- and necessary. No war can be won when members of a disloyal opposition are given free reign to undermine it.



Subject: heart attacks are funny, too

More Cover-Up
Posted by Lew Rockwell at 02:48 PM

Cheney's victim, it turns out, was also shot in the heart, and suffered a heart attack as a result. As creepazoid Britt Hume said on FOX, "it would be deeply embarrassing to the vice president if Mr. Whittington died." (Much later he added that it would be "sad" for the dead man and his family.) The hospital officials, clearly in league with the Republicans, have gone along with the idea that the veep's victim was happy, feeling great, joking, etc. One of them today pooh-poohed "heart attack" as a layman's term; he preferred ischemia. FOX then had a great woman doctor on to comment. Much to the upset of her host, she said ischemia meant part of the heart has died, and that the inflammation meant that this was an extremely dangerous situation. She also believes that there has been a cover up, since he was admitted after the accident with a very irregular heartbeat and a chest wound. What else don't we know? Was Cheney drunk? Was that the reason for the 18-hour stall before meeting with the sheriff?


Subject: Daily Show on Cheney

The Daily Show on Cheney
As reported in today's WSJ:

Jon Stewart: "I'm joined now by our own vice-presidential firearms mishap analyst, Rob Corddry. Rob, obviously a very unfortunate situation. How is the vice president handling it?

Rob Corddry: "Jon, tonight the vice president is standing by his decision to shoot Harry Wittington. According to the best intelligence available, there were quail hidden in the brush. Everyone believed at the time there were quail in the brush.

"And while the quail turned out to be a 78-year-old man, even knowing that today, Mr. Cheney insists he still would have shot Mr. Whittington in the face. He believes the world is a better place for his spreading buckshot throughout the entire region of Mr. Whittington's face."

Jon Stewart: "But why, Rob? If he had known Mr. Whittington was not a bird, why would he still have shot him?"

Rob Corddry: "Jon, in a post-9-11 world, the American people expect their leaders to be decisive. To not have shot his friend in the face would have sent a message to the quail that America is weak."

Jon Stewart: "That's horrible."

Rob Corddry: "Look, the mere fact that we're even talking about how the vice president drives up with his rich friends in cars to shoot farm-raised wingless quail-tards is letting the quail know 'how' we're hunting them. I'm sure right now those birds are laughing at us in that little 'covey' of theirs.

Jon Stewart: "I'm not sure birds can laugh, Rob."

Rob Corddry: "Well, whatever it is they do ... coo .. they're cooing at us right now, Jon, because here we are talking openly about our plans to hunt them. Jig is up. Quails one, America zero.

Jon Stewart: "Okay, well, on a purely human level, is the vice president at least sorry?"

Rob Corddry: "Jon, what difference does it make? The bullets are already in this man's face. Let's move forward across party lines as a people ... to get him some sort of mask."


Subject: evolution of newspapers

All the news stuff that's fit to print

Facing a slow death, newspapers are desperately trying to reach young readers with dumbed-down tabloids full of stories about Kobe, Britney and dental bling.

By Farhad Manjoo

Feb. 17, 2006 | Hilary Brown is a genial 20-year-old junior at Northwestern University. She's currently an intern at San Francisco magazine and her goal, she says, is to work as a magazine writer. But for all her interest in journalism, Brown has never warmed to reading a daily newspaper. And when she does read a paper, she's not reaching for the New York Times or for her big local daily, the Chicago Tribune, whose coverage she calls "repetitive." There's too much else to follow -- too much to do, she says -- for her to read the news in the detail in which the Tribune provides it. For instance, Brown points out, every day the Tribune features news on Iraq, but little of the news is compelling or new; it's all follow-ups, side details to one big-picture story, which is that things in Iraq aren't going well.

Brown gets her news from three main sources, and each gives her a general impression of what's happening in the world. She watches "The Daily Show," which she says provides "a good grasp of what's going on." She occasionally reads the Sun-Times, Chicago's smaller competitor to the Tribune, which she likes for its size. And she frequently picks up RedEye, the free, daily commuter paper published by the Tribune and aimed at young people in Chicago.

Distributed for free around train stops in the city, RedEye is meant to be a condensed, more fun version of a traditional daily newspaper. It features copy from the Tribune as well as original reporting, and though it does briefly cover major national and international news stories, it is heavy on local news, entertainment, fashion and sports. Brown calls it "super-convenient" and praises it for providing a nice balance of news she needs and wants.

RedEye represents the newspaper industry's latest attempt to hook young readers. Newspaper executives have decided that if America's youth, with their short attention spans, flagging interest in the news, and obsession with celebrity and sports, won't come to newspapers, the papers will come to them.

"Every newspaper is seeing a need to do this, and advertisers are focused on young people pretty heavily," says Diane Hockenberry, the director of audience development at the Newspaper Association of America. Today, youth-oriented "niche" publications like RedEye, most printed in tabloid format and offered for free, are stacked up in train stations, bus stops, bars, bookstores and other hipster joints across the nation, whether in big cities (Boston, Dallas, Washington) or small (Boise, Idaho; Des Moines, Iowa; or Lansing, Mich.).

For the newspaper business, these spinoffs represent something of a Hail Mary pass. Newspaper circulation has been falling steadily for years; last year the graph began to look like the NASDAQ circa 2001. In the six-month period ending in September 2005, national newspaper circulation fell 3 percent, with many large papers faring worse. Layoffs, too, abound; seemingly every other day, editors' sad-sack pink-slip memos surface on the Web: 85 newsroom staffers let go at the Los Angeles Times; 45 at the New York Times; 35 at the Boston Globe; and more at the Chicago Tribune, the San Francisco Chronicle, the San Jose Mercury News, and on and on.

To try to save the newspaper industry, publishers are staking their businesses on what would seem to be an unlikely prospect -- the idea that young people, who for years have been ditching newsprint, will come back to the paper if they're given something that can compete with today's flashy media. That's the thinking behind these youth papers, which eschew news -- relegating all serious national and international coverage to a handful of small wire reports -- and instead focus on sensational local stories, pop culture, sports, and lifestyle features. Brevity is the soul of niche; these papers speed along with rat-a-tat prose and magazine-style photo spreads that would make a travel brochure for Guam look long-winded in comparison.

For all their apparent flaws, many publishers report that these niche publications have succeeded in attracting young readers and new advertisers.


Subject: femi-funny






Subject: "Naming the 'gorilla'"

Hard to believe this was allowed onto Ethernet!


Subject: Yates/Richthofen


I just finished reading William Yates review and there are a few errors I would like to correct. First I am still pondering over Mr.Yates' referral to a "rondo" machine gun. I cannot figure out what word may have been intended, but clearly it did not include a musical composition built on the alternation of a principal recurring theme and contrasting episodes.The primary correction I would like to make however concerns the myth of who killed von Richtofen.

It has become quite clear from examination of the evidence that, although credited with the victory, Roy Brown was not von Richtofen's vanquisher. Of course the book being reviewed can be expected to support this myth as it was written just after WWI, and at that point no one even considered questioning Roy Brown's victory credit. I suspect that Roy Brown's later mental instability was due to the fact that he knew he was not the victor in this combat. Perhaps that is also the reason Brown refused to grant interviews about his combat encounter with von Richtofen for the remainder of his life.

At that point of the war the British forces were in a tenuous position and an allied victory was very much in doubt. For this reason the British desperately needed heroes to spur the recruitment of more youth into the bloody caldron of the trenches and Brown's victory over von Richtofen gave British propaganda the perfect opportunity to provide just such a hero. No doubt the British high command sat down with Brown and explained the situation to him in no uncertain terms, making it clear that he would be under orders never to reveal his true feelings on the matter.

Recent reexamination of the evidence proves that Brown was never actually in a position to attack von Richtofen's Fokker, especially during the critical final moments of the combat. Furthermore, evidence from an autopsy performed on von Richtofen's corpse immediately after death shows that the single bullet that resulted in von Richtofen's death entered from below and to the right, a point of entry that would have been impossible to achieve for an aircraft firing from a following position. Furthermore the path of the bullet through he body shows that von Richtofen could not have lived for more than 20-30 seconds after he was hit, eliminating the possibility that Brown (or some other gun) had hit him at an earlier point during the fight.

After much deliberation over the forensic evidence, it has now been established that only one man could have been in a position to fire from such an angle at that moment during the battle. That man was an Australian machine gunner, Sergeant Cedric Popkin of the Australian 24th Machine Gun Company. However no doubt like the Hollowhoax, the myth of Roy Brown and Manfred von Richtofen will soldier on long after the scientific evidence has shown the standing version of these events were a physical impossibility.


Arch Stanton


Subject: Goyfire, more more more


You guys are doing a great job of getting more radio shows on board, but I've missed my "weekly" edition of GoyFire!

Don't mean to be pushy, just wondering......

Keep up the good work!


Ed. Note: We do it as often as we can. It's not easy to coordinate multiple people scattered around the world.

Go to :
Reader Mail Index

Back to VNN Main Page