|
http://www.cablebayinternet.com/
Three out of four atheists agree that sucking boy cock and jew ass is not the way to heaven, Padre. If you need a website to spout your profundities, why not Cable Bay today? Genuine free-speech hosting, reliable and affordable...
======================================
Subject: diamonds, unlike yids, are forever
A (K)ike Is Forever
What do you give the jew who has (stolen) everything? Why the ultimate
funeral, of course!
--J Woroble
Ashes to diamonds
By Dea Hadar
NEW YORK- Bob Valentino, Sr. remembers the morning his late wife
returned home. It was last July, about nine months after she succumbed
to an aggressive cancer at age 51, and about six months after he sent
more than 200 grams of her ashes to LifeGem. This Chicago-area company
(slogan: "Love Lives On") promised to transform her remains into a
pure, sparkling and everlasting diamond. His son from his first
marriage had seen an ad on television for the memorial diamonds, and
immediately called to tell him about it. The next day, Bob was on the
phone to Rusty VandenBiesen, one of the two brothers who founded
LifeGem about four years ago. ...
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/686647.html
Thought: If the jew has to 'baiil' from itz host country again, does
this mean they will be stuffing grandma Sarah and uncle Hyman up their
azz?
======================================
Subject: Belgium Dissolving Along Ethnic Lines
The separation of these two regions -- Dutch-speaking Flanders in the north and French-speaking Wallonia -- has been quietly proceeding towards divorce, and the outcry over the affair appeared to suggest that Belgium may be flirting with Balkanisation.
Here.
======================================
Subject: "The Hypocrisy of Canada's 'Tolerance'"
The current rhubarb about the caricatures of the prophet Mohammed exposes the hypocrisy of Canada's claim to espouse "tolerance." When Ernst Zundel questions the character and dimension of the Jewish holocaust, he is thrown into jail, tried and deported. That's "hate speech." It offends Canada's 300,000 Jews. But when a Jew, Ezra Levant, publishes cartoons that incense Canada's 600,000 Muslims, and touch off demonstrations, well that's "free speech."
http://www.savethemales.ca/001430.html
======================================
Subject: Irving update
Irving Begins Prison Sentence
Here.
'I Won’t Be Silenced,' Says Irving
Historian David Irving, jailed by an Austrian court for denying the Holocaust, refused on Wednesday to apologise for offending victims of the Nazi death camps and said he would not be silenced. Irving, 67, told Sky Television he believed historians should be allowed to question official versions of history and said freedom of speech was the "right to be wrong".
Here.
Why Historians Have a Responsibility to Condemn the Jailing of David Irving
An Austrian court has sentenced historian David Irving to three years in prison for Holocaust denial. This constitutes a moment of crisis for historians and in particular for the American Historical Association. How should historians react?
The AHA has painted itself into a corner on this kind of issue. As I noted in AHA Perspectives (September 2005) and on HNN, "Historian Sees Contradiction between AHA's Stand on Holocaust Denial and Its Stand on Armenian Genocide," the AHA President at the time, Jim Sheehan, wrote: "Needless to say, the Association does not have a position on the fate of the Armenians." I pointed out that in 1991 the AHA Council had put out a statement deploring Holocaust denial. The AHA condemns Holocaust denial while presenting itself as agnostic on the Armenian Genocide. All of this seems to me to add up to a privileged position for the Holocaust, and an inconsistency which is at bottom political -- another chapter in the AHA's long record of taking political stands while denying that it has politics. An organization that defines certain historical interpretations as unacceptable is on a slippery slope.
http://hnn.us/articles/22022.html
Three Years is Not Enough, Say Irving's Accusers
Austrian state prosecutors are to lodge an appeal to try to lengthen the three-year jail term handed down to David Irving, the British historian imprisoned in Austria for lying about the Holocaust. They said he remained a beacon for the European neo-Nazi movement and had been treated too lightly after the judge at Monday's trial declared Irving's show of remorse to be a case of crocodile tears.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/austria/article/0,,1715156,00.html
Should Respectable Historians Attend and Speak at Conferences Hosted by David Irving?
Recently I spoke at a conference hosted by the controversial British historian, David Irving, who has written several seminal works on World War II. These include Hitler’s War and The Destruction of Dresden (later revised under the title, Apocalypse 1945: The Destruction of Dresden). Sir John Keegan described Hitler's War as one of the "half dozen most important books about" World War II, and Dresden represented a considerable historiographical triumph -- despite the controversy over the numbers slaughtered by Anglo-American
http://hnn.us/articles/7259.html
Europe's Free Speech Paradox
If the Europeans were so concerned about freedom of speech then they should speak out against the denial of the right of free speech to historian David Irving in Austria and others imprisoned elsewhere in Europe for their views. Jyllands Posten, to its credit, did speak out in a December
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Feb06/Petersen20.htm
======================================
Subject: U.S. tool Pakistan coming apart
The fall of Pakistan to militant Islam will be a strategic disaster greater than anything possible in Iraq, even losing an army. It will be a greater disaster than a war with Iran that costs us our army in Iraq. Osama and Co. will have nukes, missiles to deliver them, the best conventional armed forces in the Muslim world, and an impregnable base for operations anywhere else. As North Korea's Dear Leader has shown the world, nobody messes with you if you have nukes. Uncle Sam takes off his battle rattle and asks Beijing, or somebody, if they can possibly sponsor some talks.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/lind/lind90.html
======================================
Subject: Grubach on christians and holohoax
Christian Morality and Holocaust Revisionism
By Paul Grubach
grub222@aol.com
January 2006
Recently, the Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor,
declared that Holocaust denial is tantamount to "sacrilege" after he issued a
message of solidarity to Britain's Jewish community ahead of Holocaust
Memorial Day.1
According to the Catholic Encyclopedia, "sacrilege" is defined as "the
violation or injurious treatment of a sacred object." So, Cardinal
Murphy-O'Connor is saying that anyone who is a Holocaust revisionist and rejects the
traditional view of the Holocaust is guilty of violating a sacred object. But is
this really so?
Consider the following facts that the Institute for Historical Review pointed
out about the so-called "sacred doctrine" of the Holocaust: "At the postwar
Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans exterminated four
million people at Auschwitz. Until 1990, a memorial plaque at Auschwitz read:
‘Four Million People Suffered and Died Here at the Hands of the Nazi Murderers
Between the Years 1940 and 1945.' During a 1979 visit to the camp, Pope John
Paul II stood before this memorial and blessed the four million victims.
Is it 'Holocaust denial' to dispute these four million deaths? Not today. In
July 1990, the Polish government's Auschwitz State Museum, along with Israel's
Yad Vashem Holocaust center, conceded that the four million figure was a
gross exaggeration, and references to it were accordingly removed from the
Auschwitz monument. Israeli and Polish officials announced a tentative revised toll
of 1.1 million Auschwitz dead. In 1993, French Holocaust researcher
Jean-Claude Pressac, in a much-discussed book about Auschwitz, estimated that altogether
about 775,000 died there during the war years."2
So let us get this perfectly straight. Pope John Paul II invoked the concept
of God to give credence to the falsehood that four million people were
murdered at Auschwitz. In essence, he treated a sacred object--the concept of
God--in an injurious manner, as he used it to lend credence to a propaganda lie. I
could cogently argue that it is Pope John Paul II who is guilty of sacrilege,
and not those who debunk the traditional view of the Holocaust.
If Pope John Paul II had real moral integrity on this issue, he would have
publicly apologized for invoking the name of God to bless a falsehood, and he
would have tried to make amends for misleading his flock. He could have at least
shown the moral integrity to publicly admit that the Auschwitz death toll of
four million is an exaggeration by at least two million and nine hundred
thousand souls!
But he never did this. Nor has any official of the Catholic Church ever
publicly apologized for committing the sacrilege of invoking the name of God to
lend credence to the propaganda lie that four million people were murdered at
Auschwitz.
One of the most important commandments of the Christian religion is "Thou
Shalt not lie." In other words, a Christian is commanded by God to tell the
truth. This command applies to the Holocaust ideology just as it applies to any
other historical issue.
A Christian does not find the truth about the alleged Holocaust by blinding
accepting what the Zionist Establishment media tells him. For if he did, he
could end up like the late Pope John Paul II, who accepted and promoted the
propaganda lie that four million people were murdered at Auschwitz.
The point I am trying to make here is this. Cardinal Murphy-O'Connor, who
claims that questioning and rejecting the Holocaust ideology is tantamount to a
sacrilege, is just as befuddled and wrong as the late Pope John Paul II was
when he solemnly invoked the name of God to bless the propaganda falsehood that
four million people were murdered at Auschwitz. O'Connor is not obeying the
Commandments of the Christian religion--for political reasons he is prostrating
himself before the power of Zion. The real Christian strives for the truth.
He gives the Holocaust revisionist and traditional view of the Holocaust a
fair hearing, and then attempts to determine where the truth really is.
Footnotes
See Here.
2. Online: http://www.ihr.org/leaflets/denial.shtml
======================================
Subject: The Girl on judeo-Tyranny he reverse labels brownshirtism
We need to remember this in our own days, faced as we are with a regime that brooks no dissent, seeks no expert advice, and deceitfully pursues agendas inimical to the US Constitution and to the rights and safety of citizens. We have already fallen dangerously far when the US Department of Justice produces justifications for torture of detainees held without charges or access to attorneys, when Congress and the judiciary acquiesce to the executive disregarding statutory law, and when wars of aggression are started on the basis of lies and false accusations. We now read of Halliburton awarded a $350 million contract to build detention camps in the United States. Bush says "you are with me or against me." Rumsfeld and Cheney already speak of "fifth columnists" and enemies of the regime.
It is a great lie that America needs to give up its civil liberties, the separation of powers, the Geneva Conventions, and humane treatment of prisoners in order to defend itself against terrorism. If these are the Bush regime's terms for protection, Americans need quickly to find another government.
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts152.html
======================================
Subject: detention centers, by Halliburton
Of 5th Columns and Detention Centers
Posted by Wendy McElroy at 02:05 AM
An editorial in Consortium News links two separate news items that are each frightening in their own right and exponentially so if they are connected, as the commentator suggests. The article opens with the first item: Not that George W. Bush needs much encouragement, but Sen. Lindsey Graham suggested to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales a new target for the administration's domestic operations -- Fifth Columnists, supposedly disloyal Americans who sympathize and collaborate with the enemy. "The administration has not only the right, but the duty, in my opinion, to pursue Fifth Column movements," Graham, R-S.C., told Gonzales during Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on Feb. 6.
The second news item: Plus, there was that curious development in January when the Army Corps of Engineers awarded Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root a $385 million contract to construct detention centers somewhere in the United States, to deal with "an emergency influx of immigrants into the U.S., or to support the rapid development of new programs," KBR said. [Market Watch, Jan. 26, 2006] Later, the New York Times reported that "KBR would build the centers for the Homeland Security Department for an unexpected influx of immigrants, to house people in the event of a natural disaster or for new programs that require additional detention space." [Feb. 4, 2006]
Consortium News asks, "what kind of programs would require a major expansion of detention centers, each capable of holding 5,000 people?" Daniel Ellsberg -- of the Pentagon Papers whistleblowing fame -- offered one explanation, "Almost certainly this is preparation for a roundup after the next 9/11 for Mid-Easterners, Muslims and possibly dissenters. They've already done this on a smaller scale, with the ‘special registration' detentions of immigrant men from Muslim countries, and with Guantanamo."
It is time for anyone who values his or her personal liberty and safety from the omnivorous State to leave America. Leave right now while it is still possible and relatively easy to get a passport. Throughout history, the well-meaning citizens of countries that gradually slid into totalitarianism have looked back at the process after the fact and said, "How did that happen?" Reread the two preceding news items. Give a minute's thought to how little attention the items have drawn. The military and police solution has become so much the automatic default position that no one even notices them in action. The military-police society is simply "the norm" and who notices what's normal? A population numbed to State authority by having their bags and persons frisked for the State-privilege of travelling within their own nation now looks suspiciously at anyone who doesn't think the pre-emptive building of huge detention centers is normal. The kindest assessment of such dissidence is "paranoid." Less kind: you are a Fifth columnist.How much longer do you think it will be safe to speak out? Do you think it is safe right now?
======================================
Subject: 600 Lenovo laptops
Lenovo, the China-based firm that bought IBM's PC business, announced that it's bottom-line laptop will cost $600. Does anyone remember when PCs cost way more than that? Now you cannot even give some computers away.
======================================
Subject: Bush Sr. had it right on Iraq
"Trying to eliminate Saddam..would have incurred incalculable human and political costs. Apprehending him was probably impossible....we would have been forced to occupy Baghdad and, in effect, rule Iraq. There was no viable 'exit strategy' we could see, violating another of our principles. Furthermore, we had been consciously trying to set a pattern for handling aggression in the post Cold War world. Going in and occupying Iraq, thus unilaterally exceeding the United Nations' mandate, would have destroyed the precedent of international response to aggression that we hoped to establish. Had we gone the invasion route, the United States could conceivably still be an occupying power in a bitterly hostile land." - George Bush Sr., A World Transformed, 1999
======================================
Subject: Mexicans are just like humans, they lied
Father allegedly kills underage daughter's adult boyfriend
LOS ANGELES (AP) - An enraged father allegedly stabbed to death his 14-year-old daughter's 27-year-old boyfriend after the man professed his love for the girl and said he wanted to take her to Mexico, police said.
Efrain Ramos, 38, and two other people were arrested Tuesday for investigation of murder in the killing of Anselmo Sanchez-Reyes, whose body remained unidentified for a week after it was found.
"It's a very interesting case," LAPD homicide detective Mike Coffey said.
Here.
======================================
Subject: bombing of Askariya shrine was ZOGwork
Alex:
The bombing of the Askariya shrine yesterday in Samarra was done by
Mossad or a ZOG special forces team.
The strategy is: to trip off the civil war sooner in Iraq in order to
help destabilize neighboring Iran before Iran starts its oil bourse in
March; and to increase animosity between muslims and the West, to
provoke Muslims into attacking domestic targets in the West, and to
have Western militaries attack Iran and Syria.
Mossad operatives will plant rumours in Iraq that the U.S. was behind
the bombing. The blame will thus be laid on Sunnis and the West both.
As you know, Iran will stop taking payments for its oil in dollars and
have euros instead.
This will seriously weaken the U.S. dollar's stability. US ZOG
attacked Saddam Hussein for the same reason; he had stopped accepting
US. dollars for Iraqi oil.
If we ask "qui bono?" we'll see that Sunnis had nothing to gain by
bombing this Shiite shrine. The Sunni resistance is not stupid. If
one reads the System news reports of the incident closely, one will
see that the four perps carried out the bombing suspiciously easily.
In other words, they were highly trained and experienced.
Further, look at the damage. What kind of explosive device spallded
both the interior and exterior of the dome? It looks high tech to me,
something the veteran subhumans of the Mossad would know.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/22/D8FUHGT03.html
VNN is great!
Best,
D.R.
======================================
Subject: gold forum
http://goldismoney.info/forums/t29798-good-bye.html
The thread is titled Good Bye.. Look at the avatar chosen by this woman. This site has recieved new members that have joined since late DEC., and have been yelling Anti Jew, racist homophobe etc.. This is short may be interesting, see the first post. Two were banned, and this site is really difficult to be banned from the 3 men are good men, and one I think has read VNN, but can't say for sure. Night. Joe
Our condition as a Nation is going to fall away from any conditions or memories of the past totally..
======================================
Subject: Yahoo helps China bust onliners
Dissident jailed 'after Yahoo handed evidence to police'
THE American internet company Yahoo! provided evidence to Chinese police that enabled them to imprison one of its users, according to allegations that came to light yesterday.
The disclosure marked the second time in months that the company had been accused of helping China to put someone in jail. Li Zhi, a civil servant, was imprisoned on charges of trying to subvert state power after he criticised corruption and tried to join the dissident China Democracy Party. The link between him and Yahoo! was hidden after he was sentenced to eight years in 2003. However, a copy of the appeal filed by his lawyer in 2004 -- posted on Boxun.com, the US-based Chinese-language news portal -- alleges that Yahoo! Hong Kong provided details of Mr Li's e-mail registration to the police.
Here.
=====================================
Subject: retroactive laws
2-23-06
Ex Post Factostein
Just like America's 1996 Lautenberg anti-gun law - which came from Jewish senator Frank Lautenberg [1] - so it seems that laws in Austria are also applied ex post facto ["after the fact"].
http://www.nationalvanguard.org/story.php?id=8032
What if Western laws were made by White people instead of by Jews?
[1] http://wsi.matriots.com/gun_legislation.html
======================================
Subject: "The Hidden History of Zionism"
"The Hidden History of Zionism" by Ralph Schoenman, online.
Seems good, but have not read much yet. Author Jewish?
http://www.marxists.de/middleast/schoenman/index.htm
======================================
Subject: cc Frumpy
My Dear Frumpy!
A bit of advice: If I were in your position, I'd exercise great caution when it comes to printing the letters of the jew-savvy - but then again, I know how very difficult it is for smug hebes like you to keep the surging chutzpah under control.
And therein lies our salvation.
If America were still controlled by the legitimate heirs of the White Founders & pioneers who bled and died to wrest this continent from the savages - rather than by usurping, pickle-snooted, dog's ass-ugly kikefucks like you - there'd be no bogus "War on Terror" (and damn few wars of any kind) because we'd have nothing but mutually-advantageous oil-for-Cadillacs trade relations with your camel-humpin' Semitic cousins: None would be here pretending to be Americans and blowing shit up.
Yes - as with virtually every deliberately destructive policy - it was you yidvermin who let the rags in when, after decades of tireless scheming, you finally succeeded in opening the floodgates to the turd-overflow of the world's most festering genetic sewers.
For all that and so much more, I say: Go wipe your malodorous tuchus with your yarmulke then securely paste it back on your kinky judekopf, Zyklon Boy.
Auf Wiedersehen!
N.B. Forrest
======================================
Subject: 'Holocaust'
Establishment historian on "Holocaust industry" in Daily Telegraph
Dear Dr. Sanchez,
I have seen a copy of your letter to Anna Morgan of the 'Toronto Star' which I hope gets published.
I draw your attention to an article in the Opinion section of yesterday's (22/02/06) Daily Telegraph (London) by the academic historian Michael Burleigh (author of 'The Third Reich: A New History', Pan-Macmillan).
Burleigh is an affirmer of "The Holocaust". He says of David Irving: ".....he has blown out of all proportion, or better yet, using the absence of archival facts to deny warehouse-loads of other evidence of the reality of the Holocaust...."
None-the-less, in his 'Daily Telegraph' item he includes comments which will not fall lightly on Jewish ears, particularly those of 'Lord' Janner, a former President of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a former Member of the House of Commons who continues his parliamentary career as a member of the House of Lords (having escaped prosecution for the seduction of a 13 year old boy in social services care and for persistently abusing the boy for more than a year thereafter) and who is, last but not least, the President of the Holocaust Educational Trust.
Here are some of Burleigh's most trenchant observations:
".....responses among the Jews, and others, to Mr. Irving's downfall have been mixed. Lord Janner is indignant, seemingly unaware of any unease between his gloating over Irving's conviction and a platitudinous desire 'to build a decent society in the future'...."
"......but his [Irving's] cottage industry can only operate in a wider market. Although this is camouflaged as 'warnings from history', in fact, television and publishing revert again and again to the Nazis, like the biblical dog returning to its own vomit. This works either to legitimise a lay Left-wing view of the world, based on the creed of 'anti-Fascism' or more disreputably, to tempt and tantelise audiences with the Nazis' sinister glamour ....... Why does television constantly ignore the 120 million victim sof communism or people murdered by various Third World dictatorships....."
"Thirty or 40 years ago, the burning issues for historians were Nazism as one facet of a broader totalitarian challege to free societies, or, if one was on the Left, how Fsscism hasd been produced by capitalism to defend itself from communism. By the 1980s these approaches had been superseded by an emphasis on 'race', while some Jews insisted on the ultimate significance of the Holocaust."
"The Holocaust industry amounts to a secular religion. Tony Blair's government has encouraged establishing this cult through a wholly unnecessary Holocaust Day. The cult has its priesthood, ever ready with words of encouragement or censure from far away Los Angeles."
"It [the cult] has several articles of faith and taboos. In these circles, it is taboo even to broach the fact that, in the 20th century, communism happened to kill many times more people than Nazism. It is not done to query such vulgar, anti-Catholic presumptions as the alleged culpability of Pius XII for his supposed silence during the period. It is also not done even to refer to 'the Holocaust industry'."
"The industry is also not very good at asking such questions as why we need to know, down to the last pornographic detail, everything that happened to Jewish people in Hitler's gruesome imperium, or whether there should be university courses in Holocaust tourism (management thereof)."
It seems to me that while David Irving has not covered himself in much glory by the way in which he responded to the challege of the prosecution against him in Austria, and however much he is a victim of his own hubris, if the officiousness and spite of the Holocaust lobby's hounding of him has prompted the likes of Michael Burleigh to write of the affair as he has (In the normally ultra pro-Jewish 'Daily Telegraph' of all papers!) then something is afoot - at least among those people who deployed "Free Speech!" as the justification for the publication of the Zionist-inspired 'Danish' anti-Muslim cartoons.
I am glad to see your output, if only via second-hand forwardings.
Yours sincerely,
Martin Webster.
======================================
Subject: " The ass-obsessed people get ass disease"
Funny, in an odd way:
Here.
======================================
Subject: 'Holocaust,' the Giant Jewish Lung Machine's finest production
February 22, 2006
Free speech, even if it hurts
Protecting the rights of a Holocaust denier ultimately protects us all.
By Michael Shermer
Dr. MICHAEL SHERMER is the publisher of Skeptic magazine, a monthly columnist
for Scientific American and the author of "Denying History: Who Says the
Holocaust Never Happened and Why Do They Say It?"
START:
'MORE WOMEN died in the back seat of Edward Kennedy's car at Chappaquiddick
than ever died in a gas chamber at Auschwitz."
Is this line more offensive to Jews than an editorial cartoon depicting the
prophet Muhammad with a turban bomb is to Muslims?
Apparently it is, because the editorial cartoonists are still free, whereas
the man who made this statement -- British author David Irving -- was sentenced
this week to three years in an Austrian jail for violating a law that says it
is a crime if a person "denies, grossly trivializes, approves or seeks to
justify the National Socialist genocide or other National Socialist crimes against
humanity."
That Irving has been, and probably still is, a Holocaust denier is
indisputable. In 1994, I interviewed him for a book on Holocaust denial, and he told me
that no more than half a million Jews died during World War II, and most of
those because of disease and starvation. In 2000, Irving lost his libel suit in
Britain against an author, and the judge in the case called him "an active
Holocaust denier … anti-Semitic and racist." And in April 2005, I attended a
lecture he gave in Costa Mesa at an event sponsored by the Institute for
Historical Review, the leading voice of Holocaust denial in the U.S. There he joked
about the Chappaquiddick line and, holding his right arm up, boasted: "This hand
has shaken more hands that shook Hitler's hand than anyone else in the world."
The important question here is not whether Irving is a Holocaust denier (he
is), or whether he offends people with what he says (he does), but why anyone,
anywhere should be imprisoned for expressing dissenting views or saying
offensive things. Today, you may be imprisoned or fined for dissenting from the
accepted Holocaust history in the following countries: Australia, Austria,
Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Israel, Lithuania, New Zealand,
Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Switzerland.
Given their disastrous history of being too lenient with fringe political
ideologues, it is perhaps understandable that countries such as Germany and
Austria have sought to crack down on rabble-rousers whose "hate speech" can and has
led to violence and pogroms. In some cases, the slippery slope has only a few
paces between calling the Holocaust a "Zionist lie" and the neo-Nazi
desecration of Jewish property.
And as we have witnessed repeatedly, Europeans have a different history and
culture of free speech than we do in this country. In Germany, for example, the
"Auschwitz lie" law makes it a crime to "defame the memory of the dead." In
Britain, libel law requires the defendant to prove that he or she did not libel
the plaintiff -- unlike U.S. law, which puts the onus on the plaintiff -- and
the British recently debated the merits of banning religious hate speech. In
France, it is illegal to challenge the existence of the "crimes against
humanity" as they were defined by the military tribunal at Nuremberg; another law, on
the books until just a few weeks ago, required that France's colonial history
(which was not always "humane") had to be taught in a "positive" light.
In traditionally liberal Canada, there are "anti-hate" laws against spreading
"false news." In late 1992, Irving went to Canada to receive the George
Orwell Award from a conservative free-speech organization, whereupon he was
arrested and deported on the grounds that his German court conviction for denying the
Holocaust made him a likely candidate for future hate-speech violations.
Even in the land of Thomas Jefferson and the 1st Amendment, freedom of speech
does not always ring. On Feb. 3, 1995, Irving was invited by the Berkeley
Coalition for Free Speech to lecture at UC Berkeley. More than 300 protesters
prevented Irving and the 113 ticket holders from entering. (That, however, is
quite different from passing a law that bars him from speaking.)
Austria's treatment of Irving as a political dissident should offend both the
people who defend the rights of political cartoonists to express their
opinion of Islamic terrorists and the civil libertarians who leaped to the defense
of University of Colorado professor Ward Churchill when he exercised his right
to call the victims of 9/11 "little Eichmanns." Why doesn't it? Why aren't
freedom lovers everywhere offended by Irving's court conviction?
Freedom is a principle that must be applied indiscriminately. We have to
defend Irving in order to defend ourselves. Once the laws are in place to jail
dissidents of Holocaust history, what's to stop such laws from being applied to
dissenters of religious or political histories, or to skepticism of any sort
that deviates from the accepted canon?
No one should be required to facilitate the expression of Holocaust denial,
but neither should there be what Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis called
the "silence coerced by law -- the argument of force in its worst form."
The point was poignantly made in Robert Bolt's play, "A Man for All Seasons,"
in which William Roper and Sir Thomas More debate the relative balance
between evil and freedom:
Roper: So now you'd give the devil benefit of law.
More: Yes. What would you do? Cut a great road through the law to get after
the devil?
Roper: I'd cut down every law in England to do that.
More: Oh? And when the law was down -- and the devil turned round on you --
where would you hide? Yes, I'd give the devil benefit of law, for my own
safety's sake.
Call David Irving the devil if you like; the principle of free speech gives
you the right to do so. But we must give the devil his due. Let Irving go, for
our own safety's sake.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v11/v11p365_Bennett.html
======================================
Subject: jews were deeply implicated in nigger trade
Jewish Involvement In Black Slave Trade To The Americas
By Rabbi Marc Lee Raphael 2-24-6
The following passages are from Rabbi Raphael's book Jews and Judaism in the United States: A Documentary History (New York: Behrman House, Inc., Pub, 1983), pp. 14, 23-25.
"Jews also took an active part in the Dutch colonial slave trade; indeed, the bylaws of the Recife and Mauricia congregations (1648) included an imposta (Jewish tax) of five soldos for each Negro slave a Brazilian Jew purchased from the West Indies Company. Slave auctions were postponed if they fell on a Jewish holiday. In Curacao in the seventeenth century, as well as in the British colonies of Barbados and Jamaica in the eighteenth century, Jewish merchants played a major role in the slave trade. In fact, in all the American colonies, whether French (Martinique), British, or Dutch, Jewish merchants frequently dominated.
"This was no less true on the North American mainland, where during the eighteenth century Jews participated in the 'triangular trade' that brought slaves from Africa to the West Indies and there exchanged them for molasses, which in turn was taken to New England and converted into rum for sale in Africa. Isaac Da Costa of Charleston in the 1750's, David Franks of Philadelphia in the 1760's, and Aaron Lopez of Newport in the late 1760's and early 1770's dominated Jewish slave trading on the American continent."
Dr. Raphael discusses the central role of the Jews in the New World commerce and the African slave trade (pp. 23-25):
SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURIES JEWISH INTER-ISLAND TRADE: CURACAO, 1656
During the sixteenth century, exiled from their Spanish homeland and hard-pressed to escape the clutches of the Inquisition, Spanish and Portuguese Jews fled to the Netherlands; the Dutch enthusiastically welcomed these talented, skilled husinessmen.
While thriving in Amsterdam -- where they became the hub of a unique urban Jewish universe and attained status that anticipated Jewish emancipation in the West by over a century -- they began in the 1500's and 1600's to establish themselves in the Dutch and English colonies in the New World. These included Curacao, Surinam, Recife, and New Amsterdam (Dutch) as well as Barbados, Jamaica, Newport, and Savannah (English).
In these European outposts the Jews, with their years of mercantile experience and networks of friends and family providing market reports of great use, played a significant role in the merchant capitalism, commercial revolution, and territorial expansion that developed the New World and established the colonial economies. The Jewish-Caribbean nexus provided Jews with the opportunity to claim a disproportionate influence in seventeenth and eighteenth century New World commerce, and enabled West Indian Jewry-far outnumbering its coreligionists further north-to enjoy a centrality which North American Jewry would not achieve for a long time to come.
Groups of Jews began to arrive in Surinam in the middle of the seven-teenth century, after the Portuguese regained control of northern Brazil. By 1694, twenty-seven years after the British had surrendered Surinam to the Dutch, there were about 100 Jewish families and fifty single Jews there, or about 570 persons. They possessed more than forty estates and 9,000 slaves, contributed 25,905 pounds of sugar as a gift for the building of a hospital, and carried on an active trade with Newport and other colonial ports. By 1730, Jews owned 115 plantations and were a large part of a sugar export business which sent out 21,680,000 pounds of sugar to European and New World markets in 1730 alone.
http://rense.com/general69/invo.htm
======================================
Subject: jew Shamir on Irving
For Whom The Bell Tolls
David Irving was sent to jail for denying Jewish superiority.
His doom seals the reign of freedom that began with the fall of the Bastille.
By Israel Shamir
"Do not ask for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee," said the English poet, John Donne. A shameful Austrian verdict bodes ill not only for the English historian David Irving (sentenced to three years of gaol) but for our freedom as well. Never has our feeling of justice been insulted like this! When an occasional dissident was jailed in Brezhnev's Russia or Ne Win's Burma, there was always an uproar of protest. Now the only response to the Irving verdict is stunned silence. When they sent innocent Muslims to the living hell of Guantanamo, we could think: they are people of the Third World -- different rules apply. A Batista policeman in Graham Greene's Our Man in Havana had said: some people can be tortured, and some can not. When Ernst Zundel was kidnapped in the US and brought to trial in Germany, we could think: it is a German internal affair. Now an eminent man of letters, an author of widely read and acclaimed books, a recognized European figure was snatched from a civilised country and jailed for irreverence to the Jews.
Technically, David Irving was sentenced for so-called "holocaust denial". But the concept of Jewish holocaust being the only enforced dogma of supposedly secular Europe has little to do with the Second World War and its atrocities. It has everything to do with the Jewish claim of superiority and exclusivity. There is a Jewish prayer saying: "Bless you, Lord, that you created me a Jew, that you separated between Jews and the earth folks, like you separated between the Holy and Profane, that our fate is not like their fate". The Holocaust concept is just another form of this prayer. They say that even their death is not like the death of anybody else. We must deny the concept of Holocaust without doubt and hesitation, even if every story of Holocaust down to the most fantastic invention of Wiesel were absolutely true. Therefore the technical discussions of Jewish mortality are perfectly legitimate but superfluous, like the argument whether a whale could swallow Jonah is superfluous for an atheist.
The legal enforcers of the Holocaust want us to bow down to the idol of Jewish superiority, or else! They won't jail Deborah Lipstadt for denial of the Holocaust of Dresden, or Guenter Lewy who penned a lengthy piece entitled Were American Indians the Victims of Genocide? denying the genocide of native Americans. The Jews produced and published these denials for the same reason they published the Satanic Pictures - in order to emphasise the difference between a goy and a Jew. They want you to remember: you may profane Islam and Christianity, but not Judaism. You may discount the suffering of anybody but the Jews.
Thus, we should say: David Irving was sentenced for denial of Jewish superiority. His doom seals the reign of (albeit limited) freedom that began with the fall of Bastille. European history went full circle: from rejecting the rule of Church and embracing free thought, to the new Jewish mind-control on a world scale. Not only is Western Christian civilisation dead, but even its successor, secular European civilisation, has met its demise only a few days after its proud and last celebration by the Danish scribes. It was short-lived: about two hundred years from beginning to the end, the Europeans may once have had the illusion that they can live without an ideological supremacy. Now this illusion is over; and the Jews came in the stead of the old and tired See of St Peter to rule over the minds and souls of Europeans.
In 1962, Look magazine invited founder of the Jewish state David Ben-Gurion to picture the world 25 years into the future. He predicted that World Government would already be in place by 1987, with the Supreme Court for Mankind (the higher ecclesiastic body) would be established in Jerusalem, along with a shrine there commemorating the Jewish role in the bringing-together of mankind. He was mistaken by only a few years. The world is not fully subdued yet, but it already knows its new master.
In the 19th century, Europeans could not fully colonise China. But there was an obvious mark of their supremacy: the Settlement System. It divided the residents of China into two categories: the supreme human beings (the Europeans) and the lowly natives. A native who raised his hand against a superior European was tried by European colonial law, a European whose misdeed caused harm to a native was out of bounds of native justice. This system of "settlements" was dismantled by Chairman Mao after the Communist victory of 1949. Similar systems of colonial justice went down with the colonial empires that employed them, and for a short while afterwards, every country was sovereign over its land.
Some time ago, the Knesset of the Jewish State revived the Settlement System for the non-yet-fully-colonised world: an offender against the Jews, wherever he lives, wherever he commits his offence, can be brought to the Jewish court. The offended Jew may have no connection whatsoever to the Jewish State, the offence may be not considered an offence by the local native law, but he still can be brought to Jewish justice in Jerusalem. This law claimed supreme sovereignty of the Jews over the rest of mankind. This law denied the sovereignty of all nations save one. Such a claim had to be treated as any hostile attempt of the nation's sovereignty: as an act of war. But it passed in silence due to a marvellous Jewish invention: gradualness.
This method was explained by Amira Hass, the Haaretz correspondent in colonised Palestine. She wrote: "If you throw a frog into boiling water, it will jump out and save its life. But a frog swimming in room temperature water that is gradually heated will grow used to the heat; by the time the water boils, it's too late and the frog dies. In the development of the Israeli system of control over the Palestinian people and their land, the Israeli occupation has raised to the level of genius the use of gradualness as a means of making people grow used to something." This gradualness was used by the Jews - not only in regard to the Palestinians.
The Settlement System started small: the Long Arm of the Jews snatched Adolf Eichmann in Argentina and brought him to Jewish justice in Jerusalem. Adolf Eichmann was a bad guy who did a lot of harm to Jews in a big way, so many countries chose to disregard this grievous infringement of Argentine sovereignty. And it was just the beginning:
A few years later, the Polish court demanded the extradition of a Jewish mass murderer, Solomon Morel. This Morel tortured and killed with his own hands hundreds of ethnic Germans in a concentration camp in postwar Poland. His crimes were exposed by the late American journalist John Sack. Morel escaped to Tel Aviv, and the Jewish state replied to the Polish demand with imperial haughtiness: "What Chutzpah! These natives do not know their place!" Probably, Queen Victoria would reply like that if a native African chief were to demand the surrender of one of her officials to his justice.
Since then, every country, big and small, has accepted the notion of the Jews being above the law. The wealthy Russian Jewish crook Nevzlin escaped Russia and lives peacefully in Tel Aviv, next to Flatto-Sharon, a French-Jewish crook, not far from a murderer of a Canadian child, within a reach from many other killers and crooks. A powerful Jewish organisation called Khabad wrote in its charter: there should be no Jews in goys' jails. By bribes and persuasion they release Jewish criminals from jails and ship them to the Jewish state. The Khabad founder, Lubawitsch Rebbe's birthday is celebrated as a holiday, "Education Day," in the USA.
http://www.rense.com/general69/bell.htm
Dear Israel,
Congratulations on the "For Whom The Bells Tolls" article on the David Irving verdict. It sets out the full extent of Jewish power in a blunt way that not many gentile anti-semites would dare articulate.
The item contains a factual flaw, however, which may be used to damage you. I do not raise a Talmudical quibble but a substantive error of fact which might leap up from the lavatory pan, bite you on the bum and undermine your credibility.
Robert Hugh Edwards was not jailed for "denying Jewish supremacy", though he has been active in putting out e-mails claiming to have been the first "martyr" in the cause of Free Speech -v- Jewish Tyranny ever since the "Danish" cartoons issue erupted recently.
Edwards is an eccentric professional cartoonist, currently based in Ramsgate, Kent.
He first came to public attention in the early 1970s as the principal cartoonist for 'Gay News', a weekly newspaper for London's "homosexual community". Edwards penned a strip cartoon called "Croozin'" about the adventures of a young lad 'cruising' for pick-ups in the gay bars in London's Earls Court district, which Edwards himself frequented in black leather clothing.
He came to public attention because a Sunday newspaper noted that he was simultaneously a member of at least two "extreme Right Wing" organsiations which were reputed to have anti-homosexual policies. This came as a shock to Denis Lemon, the editor of 'Gay News', who sacked Edwards.
Some years later Edwards was commissioned by an East End "businessman" and thug, Jimmy Styles, to produce a comic book aimed at school children. This comic book, "The Stormer", was distributed at school gates.
I am all for propaganda to arouse the White British public against the betrayal of massed coloured immigration into our country, but I do not think that cartoons which incite children to make petrol bombs to throw at non-White immigrant children is the way to go about it.
Edwards and Styles thought differently, however. It was because of the direct incitement to children to perpetrate lethal acts of violence that Edwards was prosecuted and jailed, I think for 12 months.
There may have been anti-Jewish material in the cartoon book as well, but it was on the same level as the anti-Black/Asian content. It was certainly not a principled and sane polemic against Jewish hypocrisy on the "racism" issue with which you would wish to be associated.
If you promote Edwards as a "martyr" to the cause of opposing Jewish supremacism, then you devalue the worth of genuine martyrs to that cause.
Sincerely,
Martin Webster.
======================================
Subject: jewed math
WHAT THE JEW HAS DONE TO DUMB DOWN WHITE CHILDREN IN AMERICA--
Last week I purchased a burger at Burger King for $1.58. The Negro counter girl
took my $2 and I was digging for my change when I pulled 8 cents from my
pocket and gave it to her. She stood there, holding the nickel and 3
pennies, while looking at the screen on her register. I sensed her
discomfort and tried to tell her to just give me two quarters, but she
hailed the manager for help. While he tried to explain the transaction to
her, she stood there and cried. Why do I tell you this?
Because of the evolution in teaching math since the 1950s:
1. Teaching Math In 1950
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is
4/5 of the price. What is his profit?
2. Teaching Math In 1960
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is
4/5 of the price, or $80. What is his profit?
3. Teaching Math In 1970
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is
$80. Did he make a profit?
4. Teaching Math In 1980
A logger sells a truckload of lumber for $100. His cost of production is
$80 and his profit is $20. Your assignment: Underline the number 20.
5. Teaching Math In 1990
A logger cuts down a beautiful forest because he is selfish and
inconsiderate and cares nothing for the habitat of animals or the
preservation of our woodlands. He does this so he can make a profit of $20.
What do you think of this way of making a living? Topic for class
participation after answering the question: How did the birds and squirrels
feel as the logger cut down their homes? (There are no wrong answers.)
6. Teaching Math In 2005
Un hachero vende una carretada de maderapara $100. El costo de la
producciones es $80
======================================
Subject: fresh ape squeezins
Suddenly... Jewz Hate Poker!
Just as suddenly, you should love it.
....
Rutgers bars band after critics object
Home News Tribune Online 02/22/06
By CHRIS JORDAN
STAFF WRITER
cjordan@thnt.com
The controversial band Poker Face, labeled by critics as anti-Semitic
and racist, will not be performing at this year's state Libertarian
Party convention, scheduled for Saturday at the Rutgers University Inn
and Conference Center in New Brunswick.
The performance has been canceled because University Inn managers are
enforcing the Inn's rule that states no live music will be performed
while other events are taking place there, said Ray Caprio, Rutgers
University vice president of Continuous Education and Outreach. Caprio
acknowledged that a letter critical of the band's appearance was sent
to Rutgers president Richard L. McCormick.
Poker Face performed at the same convention in the same venue last
year.
Critics of the group said the performance was called off after
protesters -- chiefly activist Daryle Lamont Jenkins of the Jersey
City-based anti-racist One People's Project -- voiced concerns about the
group's message.
"Just because you have the freedom of speech doesn't mean you have the
right to be heard if you're intolerant," said Jenkins, a former New
Brunswick resident. "Anti-Semitic people or Nazis always say they have
a right to believe what they wish," said the monkey after three or four attempts.
Here.
http://www.pokerface.com/
NOTE: 'OPP' - One People's Project, is a front organization of the
(K)ikez antiWhite, antiChristian ADL.
-- J. Woroble
======================================
Subject: La Renouf blasted by inchworms
Here.
Holocaust outrage by beauty queen
Mark Dunn
22feb06
A FORMER Australian beauty queen has called for the bodies of Holocaust
victims to be dug up to see if they really were gassed. Lady Michele Renouf,
who was Miss Newcastle 1968 and briefly married to financier Sir Frank Renouf,
questioned whether Nazi extermination camps killed six million Jews during
World War II. The socialite divorcee was speaking outside a Vienna court
where British historian David Irving was jailed for three years yesterday for
denying the Holocaust.
Irving, 67, pleaded guilty after admitting he'd been wrong to doubt the Nazi
extermination of millions of Jews. The charges relate to a lecture he gave 17
years ago in Austria, which was once run by the Nazis. It is a crime to deny
the Holocaust in Austria, the country where Adolf Hitler was born. Irving was
arrested when he returned to Vienna in November.
Outside court, Lady Renouf, 59, ran the risk of being charged herself when she
called for the bodies of "so-called Holocaust victims to be exhumed to see
whether they died from typhoid or gas". Dressed in a pinstripe suit with a
Union Jack lapel pin, she praised Irving for "standing up to the Zionists".
"I am here to free David Irving and free Austria from this totalitarian law,"
she said.
Formerly Michele Mainwaring, she acquired her title after a brief 1991
marriage to Sir Frank, who described the union as a "nasty accident".
Sir Frank terminated the marriage after he found out that far from being
the "Countess Griaznoff" she claimed, his wife was in fact the daughter of a
Central Coast truck driver.
Since then she has become a fixture on the London society circuit and been an
outspoken anti-Semite who was kicked out of an exclusive club for her views.
She once reportedly called herself the world's "most unsuccessful bimbo".
Jeremy Jones, from the Australia-Israel Jewish Affairs Council, described her
comments yesterday as "mindbogglingly stupidity even for a supporter of David
Irving".
Irving has been banned from Australia, where he has a Queensland-based
daughter, Beatrice. He will appeal against the jail sentence.
======================================
Subject: Farrakhan on anti-White committee by retard Blagojevich
Farrakhan adviser on gov's hate crime panel
http://suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-hate24.html
BY DAVE MCKINNEY Sun-Times Springfield Bureau Chief
SPRINGFIELD -- One of Gov. Blagojevich's appointees to a state panel combatting discrimination and hate crimes came under fire from Jewish groups and a leading Jewish lawmaker Thursday for her close ties to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan.
The Blagojevich administration faced questions about why it appointed Claudette Marie Johnson in 2005 to the governor's Commission on Discrimination and Hate Crimes when she is minister of protocol for Farrakhan's group.
"When we got word she was placed on the commission as a representative of the Nation of Islam, we were clearly concerned," said Lonnie Nasatir, regional director of the greater Chicago region of the Anti-Defamation League and a member of the commission. "This is a body aimed at eradicating hate. In Mr. Farrakhan's words over the years, he's actually espoused hate."
Members invited to hear leader
Johnson's spot on the board and her ties to Farrakhan became issues after she extended an invitation to other commission members to attend this Sunday's keynote speech by Farrakhan at the Nation of Islam's Saviour's Day conference in Chicago.
Last year, according to a text of Farrakhan's Saviour's Day speech posted on the ADL Web site, the Nation of Islam leader said, "Jewish people don't have no hands that are free of the blood of us. They owned slave ships, they bought and sold us. They raped and robbed us."
State Rep. Sidney Mathias (R-Buffalo Grove), who is Jewish, said Blagojevich should dump Johnson from the anti-discrimination panel because of her status as a senior adviser to Farrakhan.
"It's not the message the governor of our state should be sending to our citizens," Mathias said of her 2005 appointment.
Won't be taken off commission
Blagojevich spokeswoman Cheryle Jackson said the governor had no plans to remove Johnson from the unpaid position and said the administration was aware of her ties to Farrakhan when she was chosen.
"The governor appointed people to the hate crimes and discrimination commission who share the goal of the commission -- to eliminate hate crimes and discrimination wherever it exists," Jackson said.
"In order for the commission to truly achieve its mission, it must be inclusive not exclusive and respectfully and constructively bring together people of different backgrounds and voices to solve our differences," Jackson said.
Johnson, who is also known as Sister Claudette Marie Muhammad, did not return a phone message left for her Thursday at Nation of Islam headquarters.
Richard Hirschhaut, director of the Illinois Holocaust Museum and a commission member, said he does not favor the immediate ouster of Johnson because her presence on the commission could open a dialogue with Farrakhan's group and perhaps moderate the past anti-Semitic tone of its leader.
But Hirschhaut said Farrakhan's speech will be a "significant litmus test" on whether she should stay or go. If Farrakhan makes more anti-Semitic remarks, "I think it will be very difficult for Jewish members . . . and very likely other representatives to remain part of a commission that includes representation from an organization espousing hate," Hirschhaut said.
dmckinney@suntimes.com
======================================
Subject: London mayor busted for criticizing jew
Here.
Mayor suspended over 'Nazi' jibe
London Mayor Ken Livingstone has been found guilty of bringing his office
into disrepute by comparing a Jewish reporter to a Nazi concentration camp
guard.
Mr Livingstone was suspended from duty for four weeks from March 1 after
being found guilty of bringing his office into disrepute.
The three-man Adjudication Panel for England unanimously ruled that Mr
Livingstone had been "unnecessarily insensitive and offensive" to Evening
Standard reporter Oliver Finegold in February last year.
David Laverick, chairman of the disciplinary panel sitting in central
London, said: "His treatment of the journalist was unnecessarily insensitive
and offensive. He persisted with a line of comment likening the journalist's
job to a concentration camp guard, despite being told that the journalist
was Jewish and found it offensive to be asked if he was a German war
criminal."
Mr Livingstone was not present at the hearing.
Mr Laverick said: "The reasonable onlooker would regard Mr Livingstone's
reputation as being damaged as a result of the exchange. The case tribunal
has also concluded that the remarks have also had the effect of damaging the
reputation of his office of mayor."
Since Mr Livingstone lost the case he must pay his own costs - estimated at
more than £80,000. He can appeal the decision at the High Court.
======================================
Subject: "re Rush bum-boy"
LETTER TO RUSH LIMBAUGH AFTER HEARING HIM TODAY 2/24 PONTIFICATE ON HIS
LIFESTYLE.....
Today I heard you talk about your butler and chef preparing a high-end meal
for jock guests in the "screening room".
What a pathetic joke you are Rush LImbaugh.
Do you sincerely believe all the crap you spout three hours every day ?
Or are you just a very very cynical person with a humungous inferiority
prepared to sell your soul for Palm Beach lifestyle and high-end rent boys
no doubt ?
How you can support Bush/Cheney beats me.
Any intelligent person, given the evidence, can grasp that 9/11 was a
false-flag operation, Israeli directed.
I guess those are the ones you work for.
Was it your Mother or Father who was the Murano ?
Enjoy the bum boys while they last.
One day, you, along with the rest, will be hung from the lamp posts
probably.
There is some good in you wretched soul but the day of reckoning approaches
======================================
Subject: Northwestern, proud home of Arthur Butz, Holo-truther nonpareil
Dissection Of Jew Censorship At Northwestern U.
(Apollonian, 24 Feb 06)
One must take due note of the mendacious and nefarious one-sided "consensus" for the two letters-to-editor for 24 Feb 06 Daily Northwestern (copied below), as both ltrs so obviously seek to continue propping up holohoax lies and false religion pushed so hysterically and oppressively upon the Christian American people--and this is aside fm the continued crass slandering of Prof. Butz's magnificent achievements for truth and history regarding the holohoax lies. I'm sure the good Prof. is smiling, the proverbial water off duck's back.
I also observe the erasing of the "feedback" to previous recent articles on holohoax and heroic Prof. Butz by Lipstadt and the paper's editor, Mr. Beder, who admits he's Jew. How otherwise then are we to conclude but that Jews so desperately seek to deny the truth as expressed in the material erased, ignored, and suppressed by these Jews?--as we see literally now before our very eyes on immediate, local scale.
The question then regarding the obligatory, justified, and understandable hatred of Jews is whether it is reasonable--which it must be if these insane Jews are to be opposed successfully and overcome. The suppressed "feedback" of mine to Mr. Bowles III's article on the connection w. Zionism and Judaism was published anyway on NewNation.org (under "commentary"), entitled, "Judaism Must Be Abo lished"; thus we see how understandably terrified Jews are for the freedom of info provided by the glorious Internet.
Hence then we see the incredible power and efforts of the Jews, so pathetic nonetheless, even at Northwestern, against truth, Christianity, reason, and not only the West, but the entire world. And this little mini-scandal ongoing now at Northwestern is typical and part of the larger conspiracy on part of present "neo-con" Jews and associates behind Bush II to pursue Orwellian "perpetual war for perpetual peace," as in Iraq and Afganistan. Surely, the students of Northwestern and a candid public can see this brazen mini-conspiracy now at Northwestern, mere illustration and parcel-part to the larger and largest conspiracies.
CONCLUSION: Thanks much then to Jews who simply illustrate their problems with God's objective reality, (Ck Gosp. JOHN 8:44) the truth, and its expression. The only question is can Jews reduce themselves even FURTHER to reduction ad absurdum? Thanks for ur attn. Honest elections and death to the Fed.
Apollonian, combat-scholar/theologian, part-time exorcist, Christian patriot
------above essay was response to below ltrs to ed. published in student newspaper----------
Letters to the Editor Daily Northwestern.com,February 24, 2006
Butz must not be forgotten
On Feb. 4, the Chicago Tribune carried a story about the recent communications between McCormick Prof. Arthur Butz and the President of Iran, who has called for the destruction of Israel as his country is developing nuclear weapons. On Feb. 7, University President Henry Bienen issued a marvelous proclamation, which was read at the Chicago campus. He spoke, in completely unequivocal terms, of his disassociation from Butz's views and recent activities, both at the personal and institutional levels. By all accounts, his feelings were quite close to the surface in delivering this heartfelt statement.
As much as many people would like to see Butz "fired," this would lead to more problems than it would solve. The university protects free speech as well as academic tenure. However, the effects of Butz on student life is not to be discounted. On Feb. 7, the Hillel Cultural Life held an open forum to discuss the issues. This was attended by students and faculty, as well as citizens from the greater community who had lost close relatives in the Holocaust. One recent NU graduate complained about the difficulty in registering for the n ecessary electrical engineering and computer science courses, given her fear of taking a course from the infamous professor. The discussion heightened, leading to the suggestion that Butz be "deprived of his right to teach." To the best of our knowledge, this is not against any university guidelines. The reaction to these events is partially due to the great infrequency between re-appearance of the issues. This is especially true of new students, who -- needless to say -- were not here in the 1970's and 1980's, when the issue was first raised.
Hopefully, the issue will quietly "die on the vine." However, this does not mean that it can be forgotten; the strong stand of NU against this sort of "revisionism" and the lack of relevant professional qualifications of the professor need to be constantly emphasized in discussions with people in the world outside of NU. Only in this way will the truth survive, against this onslaught of hate and ignorance.
-- Mark Pinsky, Professor, mathematics
Israel debate sorely lacking
While I appreciate the interest The Daily has shown over the last month regarding Jewish issues, I am frustrated that the columns on the Holocaust, Israel and Jewish identity have been framed in a way that does nothing for intelligent debate.
The Holocaust and the founding of Israel were the two landmark events for Judaism of last century, and, as a Jewish student, I am still reckoning with these two pieces of history 60 years after the fact. How much does the Holocaust shape my Jewish awareness? Do I feel comfortable with fundraising appeals that draw on the Holocaust to ask for donations? Do I agree with all of Israel's policies? Do I want to visit there -- or even move there?
These questions lead to a great deal of constructive soul searching and dialogue both within the Jewish community and among our non-Jewish friends.
But the antagon istic tone of the recent Forum columns on the Holocaust and Israel cut off all avenues for reasonable debate here. Giving air time to a Holocaust denier asks for defensive rebuttals and well-founded accusations of anti-Semitism. Telling Jewish students to divest their identities from Israel threatens many of our core beliefs and values. It is simply inviting embittered responses that will ping-pong back and forth, leaving no one with a deeper understanding of the topics, besides the fact that they are sensitive.
A far better approach to these valid issues of religious identity would be for column writers addressing the questions to ask Jewish students on campus about their feelings toward the Holocaust's place in our religious awareness, or to ask them what they like or dislike about Israel, or how they feel about the role of Hillel on campus. Spend an afternoon speaking to students in the Chabad house. Interview the leadership of some of the 16 Jewish groups on campu s. Find students who don't identify with the community at all. You could also solicit independent columns from Jewish students on the issues. The Israeli elections at the end of March are a great opportunity to discuss the political leanings of the NU Jewish community.
If The Daily is not genuinely interested in what these milestone events mean for Jewish students today, then why publish the one-sided columns in the first place?
The format of the last month's various diatribes have unfortunately not been anywhere near a level of intelligent discourse. It's a shame, because there are fascinating changes and ideas occurring constantly in Jewish thought and identity, and all of us -- Jewish and non-Jewish -- are losing an opportunity to learn something.
-- Daniella Cheslow, Medll junior Former Daily staffer
======================================
Subject: jews produced the war in Iraq
2-24-06
Iraq War Reminder
We just saw a political essay about the Iraq War. It said that the people who produced that war are not racially-Jewish, as many people claim.
That essay, however, ignores two facts:
1. The Iraq War came about in large part due to the Jewish-invented, Jewish-staffed Office of Special Plans [OSP], which was based inside the Pentagon [1]. That office channeled information directly to the White House without the info being verified by the "usual" governmental departments first.
2. A counterpart to the Office of Special Plans was created in Israel, for the same purpose.
So, it doesn't matter if Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld aren't Jewish.
[1] http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030512fa_fact [a slightly different version of the OSP story here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,999737,00.html ]
======================================
Subject: jews for jesus & 12-year-olds
Area spiritual leader facing charges from Internet sting
Here.
He sought sex from agent posing as girl, state alleges
Thursday, February 23, 2006
BY TOM BOWMAN AND JUDITH PATTON
A Susquehanna Twp. 'spiritual leader' has been charged with soliciting sex over the Internet from someone he believed was a 12-year-old girl.
Steven Jacob Mojecki, 45, of the 2000 block of Bradley Drive, Susquehanna Twp., is charged with criminal solicitation and criminal use of the Internet, first- and third-degree felonies.
"We have no statement at this time," said a woman inside the Mojecki home yesterday.
Mojecki is a co-founder of the Messianic Synagogue Beit HaShem in Susquehanna Twp. The group, founded in 1997, follows Jewish traditions but believes that Jesus is the Messiah. It is not affiliated with local Jewish organizations.
======================================
Subject: new book
Astonishing New Book
Just when you thought that "The War on Terror" couldn't get any more shocking, a Jewish attorney erases that idea in a new book. Apparently, in the eyes of the Jews, we Americans are all Israelis now - and we should therefore behave accordingly, even if we are not Jewish. This book is bound to cause massive controversy. How much are you willing to give up to support Israel and The War on Terror - a war which Israel and Israel-first activists caused-by-default?
http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0206/blankley022206.php3
======================================
Subject: German helmets for soccer fans
Nazi style helmets conquer Europe [OK, Jew, Let's Kill!]
Nazi stormtrooper helmets threaten to become hit of 2006 world Cup in Germany. Dutch manufacturer says helmets 'just a joke'
Jew soccer fans set to flood Germany in the coming summer for the 2006 World Cup may be in for an unpleasant surprise: thousands of fellow European soccer fans will apparently show up for the matches wearing helmets styled on Second World War White Christian German uniforms.
The helmets, mass-produced by a Dutch manufacturer, are made in different colors and bear slogans to fit the different countries attending the tournament.
Geerts said the Holland-based company had received only a few Jew complaints and expected to sell another 100,000 helmets before the finals this summer.
"They are meant for the supporters who watch the games on television, and in the pub, and also those who are traveling to Germany," he said.
The manufacturer of the helmets said the German police recently informed him they intend to allow White fans to wear the helmets during the games, because they were not adorned with Nazi symbols.
======================================
Subject: "al-Mossada"
Alex,
I want to start out this post by renaming the al-Qaeda terrorist group "al-Mossada". Every heinous act the shadowy al-Qaeda commits seems to benefit Israel in some form or another so from now on I'm calling it al-Mossada. What prompts my attention is the latest attack on the Shia Shrine in Iraq.
Here is the article:
Attack on Shia Shrine in Iraq Sparks Angry Protests
By Gareth Smyth
The Financial Times
Wednesday 22 February 2006
An explosion in Iraq has destroyed the golden dome of one of the most revered shrines in Shia Islam
sparking nationwide protests and sectarian reprisals against Sunni mosques despite appeals for calm
from government and religious leaders.
Wednesday's early morning blast at the Askariya shrine in Samarra, 150km north of Baghdad,
devastated the tombs of the tenth and eleventh of the 12 Imams believed by Shia to have been infallible
successors to the prophet Mohammad.
Early reports suggested armed insurgents, possibly in Iraqi police uniforms, entered the shrine and
left explosives. US troops and Iraqi police cordoned off the area and began house-to-house searches.
No one was killed in the attack on the mosque in Samarra. However a Sunni cleric was killed, police
said, at one of 17 Sunni mosques in Baghdad fired on by militants.
The Samarra attack appears to be a deliberate provocation of Iraq's Shia community, who make up
around 55 per cent of the population and comes after two deadly explosions targeting Shia civilians in
Baghdad on Monday and Tuesday.
Prime Minister Ibrahim al-Jaafari, a Shia, declared three days of mourning and called for Muslim
unity. He said the interim government had sent officials to Samarra.
Mouwafak al-Rubaie, national security advisor, blamed Sunni militants of Ansar al-Sunnah, a group
linked to al-Qaeda that has been responsible for a trail of violence in Iraq since the 2003 US-led
invasion. Mr Rubaie told Al Arabiya satellite television such militants intended to "to pull Iraq toward
civil war".
There has been growing concern among Shia Muslims, in Lebanon and Iran as well as Iraq, at
attacks by mainly Sunni insurgents on Shia civilians and religious figures in Iraq.
Ayatollah Sistani, Iraq's most senior Shia cleric, asked people to protest peacefully in their home
cities rather than travel to Samarra, which has a majority Sunni population.
Ayatollah Sistani has consistently urged his followers to show restraint and not be goaded by
attempt to incite sectarian war.
Jack Straw, Britain's foreign secretary, echoed the call for restraint, calling the attack "a criminal
and sacrilegious act" that was "a blatant attempt to ingnite civil strife and disrupt the process of forming
a new government in Iraq".
"This is a most shocking outrage against a holy shrine of the Shia community, so all of us have to
understand the anger people feel when such defilement of their shrine takes place."
He was confident, however, that Iraqis would continue to demonstrate the "remarkable resiliance and
determinination" that they had shown in the past to secure a peaceful and democratic future, as
illustrated by high turn-out in the December elections.
The Sunni Endowment, a government body that maintains Sunni shrines, condemned the blast and
said it would send a delegation to Samarra to investigate.
The Askariya shrine in Samarra is the tomb of both Imam Ali bin Mohammad, who died in 868AD,
and Imam Hassan bin Ali, who died in 872AD and was the father of Imam Mohammad bin Hassan,
whom Shia believe went into hiding in 941 and will return one day as 'the Mahdi' to inaugurate a period
of just rule on earth before the Day of Judgement.
Lessee, attack on one of the most revered shrines in Shia Islam sparks internecine war among indigenous religious factions thus breaking up Iraq into warring factions. Hmmmm, are these Muslims really that stupid? I think not. Lets ask the old question cui bono - who benefits? No wait, fuck that, lets skip directly to the meat of the matter and ask the really relevant question was - this good for jews? Ok, jew check! The jews have written a plan out called the "Kivinum Plan' so called because the essay originally appeared in Hebrew in KIVUNIM (Directions), A Journal for Judaism and Zionism; Issue No, 14--Winter, 5742, February 1982,"A Strategy for Israel in the Nineteen Eighties" by Oded Yinon. The plan is to break up Iraq into three Shi'ite southern mini-states, two Kurdish mini-states and one Sunni mini-state - with Baghdad as the seat of a federal government.
Here.
So is it good for jews, does the bombing follow their plan?
Later that week -
I began writing this the day I heard about this attack. Sure enough, comes the following report. As I said this has the stink of the Mossad all over it - al-Mossada. Thanks Jews!
Here.
Is it just me? Could it be that I becoming increasingly brilliant and prescient in my analysis? Or are the jews becoming so obvious in their attempts that even an idiot can see through their deception? Then again maybe it's nothing more than the cut I sustained this morning whilst shaving with Occam's Razor.
Regards,
Arch Stanton
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|