|
http://www.cablebayinternet.com/
Call Cable Bay today.
======================================
Subject: "Holocaust," the jew lied
Irving Loses Again by Joseph Sobran
A few years ago I had lunch with David Irving, now sentenced to three years in an Austrian prison for the crime of what in this country is called exercising free speech. Wouldn't you know it, the Holocaust came up. He joked that in America, Holocaust memorials were sprouting up "like McDonald's." He added seriously, "I'm not a Holocaust denier. I'm a Holocaust skeptic."
I've seen Irving several times since then, twice speaking at conferences he'd arranged, and never heard him say anything close to "Holocaust denial," the crime he has pled guilty to. The plea spared him a full ten-year sentence.
It has become routine to refer to him as "Holocaust denier David Irving," but nobody ever seems to quote him actually uttering a thought crime. In court the other day he confessed the "mistake" of saying "there were no gas chambers at Auschwitz," but added, "In no way did I deny the killings of millions of people by the Nazis."
And what if he really had denied it? Ten years in prison for an opinion? His lawyer called the proceedings "a message trial." Actually, of course, it was a blasphemy trial.
The rationale, such as it is, for the Holocaust-denial laws of Austria (and several other countries) is that if people are allowed to deny that it happened, it may happen again. By this logic, the Holocaust is most likely to recur in the United States, since we have no such laws here. Freedom of speech could lead to a second Holocaust! Thomas Jefferson has a lot to answer for.
Does that sound just a wee bit hysterical? It reminds me of the incredible uproar over Mel Gibson's film The Passion of the Christ, which, we were assured (in advance, by people who hadn't seen it), would cause hatred of Jews and even "violence" against them.
Now that was a pretty clear test case of this peculiar theory of historical causation. And the result? Though the movie was a huge hit, it resulted in not a single incident of violence against anyone. Even one such incident would have made headlines. "See what we told you?"
But when no pogroms occurred, nobody expressed surprise, relief, or the disappointment a prophet of doom experiences when things turn out all right. Mel Gibson made a lot of money, Abe Foxman made a lot of money, nobody got hurt. You'd think everyone would be contented with the outcome.
Even the people who predicted violence didn't really believe it, of course. Nobody in his right mind expected violence. We are so used to prophecies of violence against minorities, especially Jews, that we don't bother keeping track of them, any more than we keep track of astrologers' predictions. In the real world, things don't happen that way. Predicting another Holocaust is like predicting another Reichstag fire.
Deep down, we know this sort of talk is usually absurd. But we also know that it can be risky to say so. So we let the blowhards blow. That's how they exercise their freedom of speech.
Nobody says, or thinks, that what Irving may have said in Austria in 1989 -- the site and date of his alleged "crime" -- caused any violence to occur. Some rabble-rouser. He may have expressed his skepticism with rude bluntness (that would be just like him), but that wouldn't even have tended to inspire harm. It may have inspired more skepticism, but why is that a crime?
Because to some people, on some subjects, skepticism is blasphemy, and the Holocaust is one of those subjects. Austria's law is aimed at "whoever denies, grossly plays down, approves, or tries to excuse the National Socialist genocide or other National Socialist crimes against humanity in a print publication, in broadcast, or [in] other media."
Whew! That gives the prosecutor a lot of discretion, and the whole premise of the law -- that expressing an opinion of a calamity can cause the same calamity to recur under entirely different conditions -- is screwy.
No doubt Irving's lawyer advised him to cut a deal in exchange for a show of contrition. He avoided ten years in the slammer, but from now on he will be, in the media, not just a "Holocaust denier," but a "convicted" Holocaust denier or "confessed" Holocaust denier. Not much hope of "reformed," "repentant," or "recovering" Holocaust denier, I suppose.
Meanwhile, the Holocaust Prevention Confederation can claim another triumph. Over freedom of speech.
======================================
Subject: Hollywood analysis
Alex,
In regards to the article: "Worldwide cinema takings fall 9%"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4804880.stm
What the article does not address, but is clearly evident in these numbers, is exactly who pays to see the tripe Hollywood produces. It might be surmised from these figures that white people are the gen-u-wine paying customers for the cinema industry. Now step back for a moment and consider the implications of this astounding fact. If whites are the consuming masses, then movie themes must be specifically tailored to that particular market, unless of course those dumb jews are putting out millions of dollars in expenditures to allow their cow-flops to fall where they may - ya sure, you betcha! However it seems to me that there are many high dollar marketing firms employed for the specific purpose of ensuring that every product out there finds its target market.
Essentially, this means is that Hollywood jews are specifically tailoring their hate messages to the whites buying their products! Oh my god! now the light comes on, but whodathunkit? Of course if certain minority groups pick up on the anti-white message, well, hamhocks with the shitlins itz! The falling numbers indicate that whites are finally sick of seeing the jew's twisted message on racial stereotypes, like those brave, stalwart, Negroes who display a certain genius and strong leadership and those stupid, floppy-footed, white males that cannot tie their own shoelaces without the help from their oh-so clever and hip Negro mentor. Alternatively when looking through the jew's magic cinematic mirror, viewers find the white man as the blond haired, blue eyed, incarnation of evil who must be stopped at all costs, usually with help and guidance from Negro genius. It's a simple fact that whites are sick of being maligned by the jews and are finally refusing to pay for Hollywood's garbage. However leave it to the jew to indulge in self delusion and lay the blame on whitey for their failures, to wit:
Anti-piracy drive
Glickman said the decline came after a 24% increase in ticket sales in 2004 and
growth of more than 50% in the past decade.
He called on cinema owners to put pressure on their governments to enforce
laws against pirates using camcorders, which he said accounted for 90% of
illegal bootlegs.
"For all our efforts to combat it, we have yet to come up with a foolproof
solution to the problem," he said.
Sure, that's it, that's the ticket, those evil white are men pirating their movies, that is why the numbers are down; of course itz all so obvious when you see it through the jew's distorted lens. Camcorders? isn't that what we all use to steal movies that portray us as incompetent boobs? Strangely enough, these jews fail to explain why certain movies with a strong white message are still paying off big time at the box office. One can only wonder if Mel Gibson knows how many millions he lost form those evil whites pirating his blockbuster movie "The Passion of Christ". What the jews need now is some of that ubiquitous, down home, Negro genius to help them stamp out those evil, white, pirates stealing their shekels.
Regards,
Arch Stanton
======================================
Subject: Iranian conference salute!
Alex,
Three cheers for Dr. Fredrick Tࣆben and the Iranian conference on the Hollowhoax - Hip, Hip, Hooray! Hip, Hip, Hooray! Hip, Hip, Hooray! Were it only possible that all Aryans could participate in such meaningful action. All the other activities like marches, demonstrations, flyering and border patrol activities pale in comparison to the potential ramifications of this action towards neutralizing jewish domination. My heart goes with all the participants and their Aryan brothers; I wish them the very best of luck and may Allah allow his grace to smile upon them all.
In the meantime - git a rope.
Regards,
Arch Stanton
======================================
Subject: WND, diverting attention from the kikes
WorldNetDeli says:
"Why are groups like the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergers -- groups whose members are obviously powerful with connections to wealth and political influence -- never the subject of the evening news? .....Monteith reveals the identity of the mysterious forces behind the men who rule the world, and why some U.S. leaders have dedicated their lives to destroying their own nation. "
[Oooo, I know, I know! Fat, bald pastry chefs are behind it all! Yep. Chefs with names like Goldberg, Goldstein, and Rosenfeldwitzbloom! Right? Right? No??? Darn...]
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49197
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|