|
http://www.cablebayinternet.com/
Cable Bay - for page-hosting, servers and more...
======================================
Subject: 'hate' hoaxeress pleads guilty
Friday, April 14, 2006 · Last updated 2:08 a.m. PT
Woman pleads guilty in racist letters case
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WAUKEGAN, Ill. -- A black woman accused of sending threatening letters to minorities at her former college has pleaded guilty to felony disorderly conduct and was sentenced to two years' probation.
Alicia Hardin, 20, also was ordered Thursday to perform 200 hours of community service, pay $2,000 restitution and cease all contact with Trinity International University, a small Christian school in suburban Chicago.
Hardin also has to submit to psychological testing if her probation officer recommends it, according to the Lake County state's attorney's office.
Authorities say Hardin sent letters filled with racial slurs and threats of violence to two black students and a Hispanic student last spring. One of the letters read: "I saw you in chapel... I had my gun in my pocket, but I wouldn't shoot."
Authorities have said Hardin sent the letters because she was unhappy at the school and wanted her parents to believe she wasn't safe there. The threats prompted officials to move dozens of minority students off campus for one night out of concern for their safety.
Hardin was arrested after tips from other students.
Here.
======================================
Subject:
WHAT THESE 'NEW AMERICANS' HAVE IN MIND
'La Raza' discloses plan for whites
"The Race" indulges in an orgy of undisguised, anti-white hate and bigotry.
But because it's against Europeans—Aryans—it's not "racism." That means
it's okay with every sell-out politician, pundit, businessman, churchman
and individual piece of neo-Bolshevik filth.
Let's listen to these 'Razistas.'
---
"Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out!
We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you.
Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die.
Through love of having children, we are going to take over."
— Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets
"They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and
other institutions. They're right. We will take them over. We are here to stay."
— Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Councilman
"We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying.
The explosion is in our population ... I love it. They are shitting in their pants
with fear. I love it!" — Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas
"Remember 187—proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non-citizens—
was the last gasp of white America in California."
— Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party
"We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming
citizens of this country ... I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, 'I'm going
to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back.'"
— Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor
"California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."
— Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations
and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry
Brown; also awarded the "Presidential Medal of Freedom" by President Bill Clinton
"We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California."
— Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General
"We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos."
— Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University
"The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico
without firing a single shot." — Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico
Are these just the words of a few extremists? Consider that we could fill up many pages
with such quotes. Also, consider that these are mainstream Mexican leaders speaking.
DID YOU KNOW?
1. On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles
Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican, even though most lived in this
country. They booed during the National Anthem, and as the match progressed,
supporters of the (white) American team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched
and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the white players before and after the
match. The coach of the American team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most
painful experience I have ever had in this profession."
2. Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can
come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts?
It's called "Affirmative Action," or racial privilege. The president of Mexico could migrate
here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable to Americans of European
descent.
Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated.
Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges
for Latino, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by 13 Republicans. Bill Clinton
and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe that massive immigration from
countries like Mexico is good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants.
Corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and Third World immigrants
should get special, privileged status. The corporations include Exxon, Texaco, Merrill
Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber, Starbucks, and many more.
3. Did you know that Mexico regularly intercedes on the side of the defense in criminal
cases involving Mexican nationals? Did you know that Mexico has NEVER extradited a
Mexican national accused of murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so?
According to the Los Angeles Times, Orange County, California is home to 275 gangs
with 17,000 members, 98% of which are Mexican and Asian. How's your county doing?
4. According to a New York Times article of May 19, 1994, 20 years after the great
influx of legal immigrants from Southeast Asia, 30% are still on welfare compared to 8%
of households nationwide. A Wall Street Journal editorial dated December 5, 1994 quotes
law enforcement officials as stating that Asian mobsters are the "greatest criminal
challenge the country faces." Not bad for a group that is still under 5% of the population.
5. Is education important to you? Here are the words of a teacher who spent over 20
years in the Los Angeles School system. "Imagine teachers in classes containing 30-40
students of widely varying attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent
in English. Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the majority of students,
and that means fewer words and math problems and more pictures and multicultural
references."
THERE WAS A TIME WHEN ...
A. It was understood that America was a WHITE country and that the word "America"
didn't exist until the coming of the first Europeans.
B. The Founders Fathers were honored as WHITE men, with a WHITE vision for America.
C. The English language was accepted as the common public language by every legal
EUROPEAN immigrant, who didn't demand special privileges, "Affirmative Action," welfare
or a right to break the law.
THINK ABOUT IT ...
... And then go spread the word to at least three other white persons.
"Those who want to live, let them fight; and those who do not want to fight
in this world of eternal struggle do not deserve to live."
— THE BOOK, I:11/289, (HM edition)
NEW ORDER
Dept E
PO Box 270486
Milwaukee WI 53227
http://www.theneworder.org
======================================
Subject: if hate is truth, then hate-haters are liars at the least
Is it "Hate" or the Truth?
We saw an interesting racial cartoon on the internet, which the "average" citizen might find to be rather shocking, or even hateful. Allow us to quote the cartoon, which refers to Jewish-dominated Hollywood [the quote is slightly sanitized here for our milder readers]:
"The jew uses the TV to make our women f*ck niggers."
http://www.vnnforum.com/showpost.php?p=224881&postcount=27 .
Does that sound like hateful propaganda to you? If it does, then perhaps consider a movie which we watched a few days ago on home-video. The movie was called "The Perfect Storm" [2000]. It is about a commercial fishing boat which sinks at sea during a violent storm off the east coast of America. In a couple of early scenes in the movie, a blonde, White woman is shown kissing and/or embracing a Black fisherman. In fact, in one scene, the interracial couple walks up some stairs in a barroom, apparently to make love in an upstairs room above the bar, according to risqué comments made by other fishermen who are present in the bar.
What does that interracial romance have to do with a fishing boat which sinks during a storm? We don't know. We don't see a connection between interracial romance and fishing. Maybe we missed something while reaching for the popcorn. We do, however, understand why that cartoonist might create such a cartoon: many Hollywood movies and TV shows these days feature interracial romances involving Whites and Blacks - often, it seems, featuring a White woman/Black man theme.
======================================
Subject: jews and their plans
4-16-06
"Jews' idiotic anti-nationalism"
Interesting comments from Jewish writer Auster:
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/#005400
======================================
Subject: "Black names these days"
"Purvis Virginia Parker?" for a boy's name? And "Quadrevion Henning?" How do Blacks dream up these names?
Here.
======================================
Subject: igwality
4-15-06
"Equality" Made Easy
We noted a sad article in our local newspaper today about a female firefighter who is claiming discrimination and harassment from fellow firefighters due to her sex [1]. That matter reminds us of how American women became police officers and firefighters in the first place.
Did women fill police and fire department jobs because they are as strong and as physically versatile as men? No. They arrived in police and fire department vocations another, easier way: through special laws and lawsuits, beginning in about 1964.
In other words, only through artificial means did women become "equal" to men in previously-all-male vocations [by the way, it should be noted that most fire and police departments had to lower their standards to employ women, e.g., most height/weight and strength requirements have been either altered or completely abolished].
[1] we do not use the now-popular term "gender" since it only applies to grammar, e.g., masculine/feminine words. The term "gender" has largely replaced "sex" for solely political reasons, i.e., it can now be claimed by liberal activists that a person's sex is not defined by physical traits alone, e.g., so-called "gender identity" in transsexuals and transvestites
======================================
Subject: the earliest Americans
Hello Dear Alex,
While VNN contributor MILLARD wirtes excellent material, he needs to 'bone
up' on Kennewick Man, Spirit Cave Woman, the Clove People, etc.
ALL OLDEST HUMAN REMAINS, AS YET FOUND, IN NORTH AMERICA, CENTRAL AMERICA,
AND SOUTH AMERICA, PRE-DATE THE so-called 'native Indians' (by THOUSANDS of
years) and are NOT 'Indians.'
Please allow me to repeat myself: The OLDEST skeletal remains ever found in
the Americas are NOT 'Indians.'
The present theory, among the best and honest anthropologists -- I am NOT
making this up -- is that WHITE humans may have populated the Americas, from
top to bottom, then been GENOCIDED (i.e., murdered) out, by lesser mud
peoples, at about 5,000 to 10,000 years ago.
'Native American' or 'Native Indian' no longer means anything, whatsoever,
in terms of the real genetic record of North America ... which will 'out,'
as truth will, in the long run.
Tell your children!
George Crane
88!
Ed. Note: Millard is not a VNN contributor; he is an unknown who may well be a jew. Sometimes we post his columns. Time recently ran a cover story about Kennewick Man. It was as though the point of the story were to emphasize KM was not White. The 'Iberia not Siberia' theory, which looks increasingly likely in light of the evidence, was introduced at the tail end, only to discount it.
======================================
Subject:
All-white jury came from racially balanced pool
By DAVID DOEGE
ddoege@journalsentinel.com
Posted: April 15, 2006
Before the trial for three former police officers accused of beating Frank Jude Jr. began, state law and Circuit Court officials dictated that 30% of the people who were potential jurors in the case were minorities.
Advertisement
68431Frank Jude Jr. Beating Case
2006 Jury Pool Racial Breakdown
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Related Coverage
The Trial: Case of bad strategy?
Kane: In time of despair, we need hope
Reaction: Observers react with anger, dismay at verdicts
Stingl: Jude case plays out like a tragedy
Spengler: Will focus on getting job back
Closer Look: All-white jury came from racially balanced pool
Victim: Jude is 'devastated'
Next: Case to get federal review
Multimedia
Audio/Video: The verdict, press conferences, community reaction
Audio Slideshow: Protestors take to the streets in reaction to the verdicts
Archive Coverage
Archive: Previous coverage of the Frank Jude, Jr. beating case
But when jury selection started, chance and the strategic decisions of attorneys took over, ultimately leading to an all-white panel that, after a two-week trial, found the three white defendants not guilty of beating the biracial Jude.
Only the jurors involved in the case know what role, if any, race played in the verdicts. But District Attorney E. Michael McCann and an attorney for one of the fired officers think the inability to seat minorities on the Jude jury signals potential problems in the current jury selection setup.
"I was keenly disappointed when I saw what happened in this case," McCann said Saturday.
"This is an issue that criminal defense attorneys have been raising and complaining about for decades," said attorney Steven R. Kohn, who represented Masarik. "I think it is a good thing that this issue is being raised, and if it is this case that results in changes taking place, then that is good."
In a statement released after the verdict, the Milwaukee branch of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People said the all-white jury highlighted "flaws in the justice system."
"A system that accommodates the exclusion of African-American and Latinos from jury service is wrong," the statement read in part. "We believe people of all colors can be objective. We demand that the jury selection process include more African-Americans and Latinos."
Michael Hart, another attorney on the case, insisted that the jury selection was fair, but conceded that lack of diversity on the panel was problematic.
"I would say it looks like it is not representative of the community and, to the extent that is true, that is troubling," Hart said.
However, defense attorney Gerald P. Boyle said concern about the racial makeup of the jury amounted to "a red herring."
"They were all human beings," Boyle said. "I don't think it has anything to do with color.
"To make race an issue is a disservice to this jury that deliberated 25 hours."
The jurors in the trial for Jon Bartlett, Daniel Masarik and Andrew Spengler came from a list of 175,000 county residents that constitute the 2006 juror pool for Milwaukee County, according to Lori Watson Schumann, jury services coordinator.
Each year, Schumann explained, her department calculates how many residents it will need in the juror pool for the year and selects that number of people from a state Department of Transportation database listing 600,000 county residents who hold driver's licenses or state identification cards. The pool is established so it mimics the racial makeup of the state database.
The racial breakdown for the 2006 pool, like the database, is: 70% white; 19% African-American; 7.5% Hispanic; 3% Asian; and 0.5% American Indian.
The attention to the racial ratio ends when jurors are summoned to make up the pool of prospective jurors for weekly jury duty, Schumann said. The weekly list is drawn based on estimates of jurors needed provided by judges' clerks.
"Race is not taken into account at all," she said about the weekly pool. "It is just random."
Asked why, Schumann said that's what the law requires. It states: "Whenever an issue is to be tried before a jury, the clerk of circuit court shall randomly select names from the prospective juror list until the desired number is obtained."
When a trial begins, Schumann's computer pulls as many names from the weekly pool as a judge requests.
For the Jude jury, Circuit Judge David A. Hansher had Schumann's computer pull 200 names. The selection process began with the first 160 people on that list completing questionnaires, which were prepared in advance by Hansher and the attorneys on the case.
The questionnaires were used by the participants to cull people from the list based on contacts with law enforcement, court experiences, knowledge of the defendants and the attorneys, and their opinions based on pretrial publicity. Prospective jurors were not asked to note their race on the questionnaires, so when Hansher and the attorneys eliminated 80 based solely on the questionnaires, they had no idea how many minorities they ruled out.
"We got rid of people without ever seeing their faces," said Bridget Boyle, one of the attorneys for Bartlett.
The pool list for the Jude jury was not available Saturday, but Hart said he believed that the remaining 80 included 10 minorities. The final 15 jurors, who included three alternates, were selected from the first 33 people listed in the remaining group of 80.
Peremptory strikes - a process by which attorneys can eliminate jurors without stating a reason, except in the case of minorities, where a reason must be given - were used by the attorneys to eliminate 18 from the 33 - nine by the defense and nine by the prosecution. Those struck by the prosecution included two Hispanics; defense attorneys struck two African-Americans.
McCann said he struck one Hispanic woman because she once reported being a victim of a crime in which his office declined to issue criminal charges. He said he could not recall the reason for striking the other Hispanic, but said he and his assistants were concerned that both Hispanics, based on their answers during the selection process, expressed experiences which would "have an impact on their decisions."
Kohn and Hart each said they used peremptory strikes to remove black women who were inattentive.
"She looked like she had closed her eyes and wasn't paying attention," Kohn said of the woman he struck.
"She was disengaged and non-responsive to some of our questions," Hart said of his strike
Attorneys are prohibited from using peremptory strikes to remove jurors for racial reasons. McCann challenged the defense strikes of the two black women, but Hansher - who could have rejected the strikes - ruled that the justifications offered were legitimate. The judge said Saturday night he could not comment because two of the officers still have pending charges.
"If the attorney can cite any credible reason, it is acceptable," McCann said. "It's a fairly low standard.
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=416215
Case of bad strategy?
Witness credibility may have hurt 'code of silence' argument
By DERRICK NUNNALLY and JOHN DIEDRICH
dnunnally@journalsentinel.com
Posted: April 15, 2006
After a jury acquitted three former Milwaukee police officers of severely beating Frank Jude Jr., thousands of people who had expected convictions wondered, "What went wrong?"
Advertisement
68431Frank Jude Jr. Beating Case
Click to enlarge
Photo/Jack Orton
"I was disappointed twice when I woke up this morning," says Tameca Walton at the Farquharsons Hair Styling Salon, 4620 W. Center St., Milwaukee. "Once when I heard about the boys and again when I heard about the verdict (in the Frank Jude Jr. beating case)."
Click to enlarge
Photo/Jack Orton
Attorneys in the trial of three Milwaukee police officers accused in the Frank Jude Jr. beating case confer with Judge David A. Hansher Friday over the release to the jury of a statement made by a witness.
Related Coverage
The Trial: Case of bad strategy?
Kane: In time of despair, we need hope
Reaction: Observers react with anger, dismay at verdicts
Stingl: Jude case plays out like a tragedy
Spengler: Will focus on getting job back
Closer Look: All-white jury came from racially balanced pool
Victim: Jude is 'devastated'
Next: Case to get federal review
Multimedia
Audio/Video: The verdict, press conferences, community reaction
Audio Slideshow: Protestors take to the streets in reaction to the verdicts
Saturday's Stories
'Not Guilty': Former officers cleared in Jude beating case
Editorial: Justice undone in a case testing Milwaukee resolve
The Victim: Jude remains in prison
The Accused: State law keeps 3 fired officers on payroll
Background: Off-duty cops' party turned violent for Jude
Archive Coverage
Archive: Previous coverage of the Frank Jude, Jr. beating case
Jurors aren't talking, so no one knows for sure. But some observers suggest it could have been a case of the prosecution having too few witnesses and credibility issues with their best ones. And the strategy prosecutors used to show the "code of silence" may have left them short in a numbers game that led to not-guilty verdicts for Andrew Spengler, 26, Jon Bartlett, 34, and Daniel Masarik, 26.
"It was a cover-up case," said District Attorney E. Michael McCann, frustrated by his first defeat in a felony jury trial in his 42-year prosecuting career. "We brought it right out in front of them."
But apparently they didn't see it.
McCann presented much of the evidence through extensive, almost hostile interrogations of stonewalling police witnesses who said they never saw the defendants or anyone else beat Jude. McCann repeatedly invoked the phrase "police code of silence."
That approach, he said, was necessary to help jurors understand why - when there were so many people at the party, including more than a dozen officers - there were so few accounts of what happened to Jude.
He defended the tactic Saturday as "proper impeachment," of the reticent officers.
Finally McCann called two who appeared to be his star witnesses - the only two MPD officers who said they did see who beat Jude - Joseph Schabel and Nicole Belmore, who responded to the scene in uniform and on duty. They each gave testimony damaging to the defense, and both said they'd suffered reprisals within the department for cooperating with prosecutors.
The contrast seemed sharp. But the jury may have just been keeping a ledger count that favored the defense: Six officers said one thing, two said something else.
"If I were a juror, I would have been wondering, sometimes, why this witness was called," said Jonathan C. Smith, attorney for Daniel Masarik, referring to the officers who said they didn't see anything. "The state was trying to really build this code of silence thing, but that is not evidence. You cannot convict people for what they didn't say or didn't see."
Exploiting weaknesses
All three defense attorneys attacked the credibility of Belmore and Schabel. There were liabilities to exploit: The officers didn't mention the beating in their first reports, didn't initially name names for investigators, and Belmore didn't identify one of the defendants until photos had appeared in the media.
The two were the first on-duty officers to respond to the scene outside a party at Spengler's house early on Oct. 24, 2004, in Bay View. Jude had shown up at party with three others, but left after a short time and was accused of stealing Spengler's badge. A confrontation ensued in the street outside.
The defense also focused on a 911 call in which a woman who had come to the party with Jude, Kirsten Antonissen, tells a dispatcher that on-duty officers had joined in the beating.
At trial, Antonissen testified she didn't remember what she saw, and Bartlett revealed, for the first time, that he remembered seeing Schabel kick Jude.
"I hope the jury speaks to it, but I suspect much hung on Schabel," McCann said. "(Antonissen) believed he struck Jude when he arrived. That's a very unusual twist in the case. I've tried a lot of cases and never had that come up."
In a case with little hard evidence, that 911 recording seemed key. A transcript of it was among the few pieces of evidence jurors requested during deliberations.
"It's common sense to say what she's talking about at the time (of the beating) is an accurate sense of what's going on," defense attorney Bridget Boyle said. "It's a play-by-play."
Defense attorneys glided past other parts of the taped call, where Antonissen said up to 15 men she believed to be off-duty officers were taking turns kicking Jude in the head.
The defense contended that two of the off-duty officers - Bartlett and Spengler - put themselves on duty to arrest Jude, who they believed had stolen Spengler's badge. But the men did not beat Jude, jam anything in his ears, put a knife to his throat or yank back his fingers, their lawyers said.
The third defendant - Masarik - simply claimed he wasn't there, but was inside Spengler's house looking for a memo book.
Because an all-white jury acquitted white officers in a beating case with racial overtones, "I've heard some comparisons to the Rodney King case," said Rodney Cubbie, defense attorney for officer Ryan Packard, who was at the Spengler party but not charged in Jude's beating. "There's a difference. In King, you had a videotape that showed the beating, and the question was whether or not it was justified. Here, you don't have a videotape that shows who did what, and none of the defense attorneys argued that what happened to Jude was justified.
"The big question was: Who did it?"
The eight-woman, four-man jury deliberated 26 hours. Because their names have not been released, attorneys could only speculate what evidence and which arguments the jury found convincing or flawed.
"They were just trying to figure out, as I have done for the last year and a half, who did what to Jude," said Bridget Boyle, who, along with her father, Gerald Boyle, defended Bartlett.
McCann never had to prove the defendants actually beat Jude.
They were charged in each count as being "a party to the crime," someone who can be convicted if he or she is "aiding and abetting" the person who did it or was a member of a conspiracy to commit the crime. Even if it were proved that a defendant stood around Jude and was "ready and willing to assist" but didn't do anything, he could be convicted, according to the jury instructions.
"That was a pretty smart way to charge it," said Lee Jones, a candidate to succeed the retiring McCann. "There had to be some disconnect between that and the way it was presented to the jury."
Bartlett's own testimony - that he cut Jude's coat, held him down and punched him - appeared to have approached the definition of being "party to a crime." Bartlett's defense was that he was lawfully acting as an officer and that Schabel and Packard assaulted Jude.
McCann said he has not decided whether to proceed with a pending perjury charge against Masarik, related to his testimony at a John Doe investigation of the Jude matter, or what will happen with the charge the jury could not reach agreement on Friday, substantial battery, party to a crime, against Bartlett.
McCann said he still hopes officers who know what happened will come forward.
"I just keep hoping someone comes forward and says, 'I can't live with myself,' " McCann said. "Decisions like that define who you are as a human being."
======================================
Subject: support for Israel is unAmerican
The Passionate Attachment:
U.S. Support for Aggressive Zionism, the Real Problem in the Middle East
By Albert Doyle, LL.B., LL.M.
"So likewise a passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils.
Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in
cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other,
betrays the former into participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter, without adequate
inducement or justification. . . .
"Real patriots, who may resist the intrigues of the favorite, are liable to become suspected and
odious; while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to
surrender their interests." — Washington's Farewell Address, September 19, 1796
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12620.htm
======================================
Subject: a special thought this Passover
From:
When Pharaoh chased you, he was not trying to bring you back, he was
trying to get you to run faster.
This is the best piece of Passover exegesis!
Deserves to be included in the Haggadah!
My respects,
Shamir,
on behalf of the Elders
======================================
Subject: cruises = nigger danger
Here.
Don't be shocked in the Holloway girl's case, if the suspect turns out to be a an island nigger. I have taken many Caribbean cruises in the past, where the ship would stop off at these nigger inhabited islands. You would see a lot of these White teen age girls from the cruise ship ( with or without their parents), cruising for niggers on these islands, as well as cruising for the shit-skined ship cabin stewards, only for the purpose on having sex with these groids.The Jew controlled media, the Jew controlled government, the Jew controlled educational system & the Jew controlled judeo-churches push for miscegenation & their main victims are White teen girls. These teenage girls just want to "sneak a fuck," to see if there is a difference from these island tar-babies & their White boy friend chumps back home & convince themselves that there not racists. To these young girls, nobody back home will find out about their quicki-mud-sex romps anyway, just chalk it up. So much for taking your teen daughters on "cruises."......A WARNING TO PARENTS!!! RAISE YOUR KIDS RIGHT!!!!
======================================
Subject: origins of Cuba
4-15-06
Britain, Spain "Become" Cuba
In the communist country of Cuba, a citizen can be arrested for merely saying the wrong thing - such as criticizing Cuban dictator Fidel Castro.
How ironic, then, that in "free" Western countries - i.e., England and Spain - men have just been arrested for "speech crimes" - in other words, saying/offering speech which is politically-incorrect and which goes against the New World Order [also known as the Jew World Order since Jews lead it] [1] [2].
Jews have led the movement to censor free speech in almost every White country - and they have largely succeeded. In fact, only in America can one enjoy totally free speech. In that way, America is the last outpost of free speech. When Americans are finally censored - due to clever manipulations of law hidden in bogus "racial intimidation" arguments - the West will have knuckled under to non-White desires and will have lost its freedom completely [3]. In many ways, America is the last bastion of true freedom. Enjoy that freedom while it still exists.
[1] England: http://heretical.com/ [see the top of the page]
[2] Spain: http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/?p=488#more-488
[3] Jews are not genetically White, even though they have "White" skin-color
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|