Reader Mail: 17 May 2004





======================================

Subject:

Note: VNN will temporarily be moving to

vnnforum.com/main sometime after midnight...check vnnforum.com for any updates if you can't access the main site.

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

...Al,

Shoulda, coulda, woulda been there were I not getting my own basement in order.

All the best,

Mawrk

======================================

Subject:

Hi, Peter:

Re: Here.

You and your VDARE writers ought to begin using the terms GENOCIDE and CULTURICIDE, as it is getting a bit late for any recovery of WHITE CIVIL SOCIETIES in the West:

What a revealing statement that is, from the Catholic Church, regarding conflicts within inter-faith marriages, which conflicts are not just religious ones but RACIAL ONES, arising from Arab/Islamic men seducing and marrying white/Christian women in white Western democracies, as all men of color are competing with white men for white women, effecting whites' genocide: The Vatican has warned Catholics against marrying migrant Muslims [Vatican City (Reuters), May 14, 2004]; a warning premised on irreconcilable differences between Western/Christian values and Arab/Islamic ones, such as the West's values of human rights and democracy, which values are incompatible with Islam, and which concern by the Vatican indirectly addresses the underlying danger of non-white men effecting whites' genocide within their own white civil societies (men of color prefer white women to their own, as, generally, non-white women cannot match the physical beauty of the white female).

Best,

/R

http://foundersamerica77.blogspot.com/

======================================

Subject:

Mr Linder:

Your Zionist readers can learn all about the temple at http://www.cohen-levi.org/temple_studies/in_and_about_the_temple.htm . It will be rebuilt during the Gathering of Israel. Also the home page at http://www.cohen- levi.org/ discusses the priest line of Levy and Cohen. Jewish Genetics are discussed as well.

DEP
Zionist
Rastafarian

======================================

Subject:

Did any of you see the beer commercial (I think it was Miller) that goes like this:

A man and woman are back and forthing. He says something like, "I love you". She says, "I'd love you even without your money.". He says later, "I love you so much I tore up the pre-nup". (Actually, that in itself is a joke. What good are contracts in JewSA, where some greasy kike lawyer, along with ZOG courts can do as they please?) Anyway, the screen says, "Six months later." Then the bitch, along with her lawyer, is sliding divorce documents to the guy, who is obviously dejected, and she says, "I'm so glad you tore up the pre-nup."

Now, this is supposed to be funny? Everyone I told this to does not even get mad, does not see how despicable this fucking commercial is. Some cunt marries a wealthy white guy (quite possibly because he did not spend all his money on shoes), and later on she divorces him, and takes a substantial portion of his assets. And, in this jewish usa, people are not only taught that this is not rotten behavior, but, the women are actually encouraged to do this sort of thing. Stupid, brain dead, beer swilling, football/nigger worshipping american assholes. Fuck the United States, Fuck its citizens.

Steve

======================================

Subject:

Hi Alex,

Since someone was talking about the movie, "The Music Man" and invited readers to identify the Star of David, I invite the readers to see if they can spot the Swastika in The Silence of the Lambs. Yes, a Swastika! Fucking jew maggots. Always throwing in some anti-German, or anti-Nazi, or some reference to the Big, at any opportunity.

Anyway, it shows up very late in the movie. When (Buffalo Bob ?) learns that his dog has been captured by the girl he kidnapped. When he goes into his bedroom, you can see his bed-quilt; it has a bunch of Swastikas on it. Be quick, it is on screen only for a second or two. Of course, Buffalo Bob was a sick, evil prick, and he has Swastikas, so, naturally, the Germans (or Nazis) were/are sick!

You know, the fucking jews (justifiably) think the goyim are stupid. On the one hand, they claim the evil Germans killed off thousands (or millions) of homosexuals and perverts, (I'm assuming Buffalo Bob was meant to be homosexual), and yet, here is a homosexual having a bed quilt adorned with Swastikas. Pierce was right; The juden are biologically incapable of shame.

Steve

======================================

Subject:

http://www.g2mil.com/May2004.htm

The Magazine of Future Warfare

======================================

Subject:

WorldNetDaily: Rise of a judicial dictatorship

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38524

======================================

Subject:

Alex,

Good job in Topeka! CNN coverage and everything. No matter what slant the kikenmedia put on it, the groundwork to awareness that yourself, Billy Roper and others have laid can not only serve to awaken others, but propel them to "see what itz all about".

Great Job! Salute!

Stan Sikorski
NJ

Ed. Note: Thanks. I hope we made some impression on investigators in the crowd. I know the crowd did not know the information I yelled at them. Now a bunch of new people know that the NAACP was founded by...jews.

======================================

Subject:

Topeka; very very good!

Comments on event organization and controls are very very constructive, too.

No partners.

Ed. Note: It's not an issue of partners, it's an issue of organization, direction, and control. It is not good enough to have loose assemblies of people. A demo like this is not a free-speech forum, but a produced event that needs to be pretty tightly scripted, the only openings left for interaction with hostiles and investigators and newcomers bearing witness. There's no point in showing up at something just to show up. So what? WE are the AGGRIEVED PARTY. It is incumbent on us to take our claim and make our case directly to our oppressors and the uncomprehending among the crowd. If the police are going to block our interacting with these folks as though we're some sort of infectious agent, then perhaps we need to start ignoring the cops, and making them hustle to keep up with us.

======================================

Subject:

Alex:

Note the way in which the Jew Rabinowitz aims the word zeitgeist at a woman named Breitweiser. Interesting. Any chance the Jew Rabinowitz just doesn't like the idea of an apparently gentile woman prying at 9/11? How dare this shiksa speak, Jew Rabinowitz seems to be saying, when it's clearly we Jews, and only we Jews, who are qualified to opine.

Note the widow's bewilderment at the end of this story. Why does the Jew hate you so much? Because the Jew has hated you for three thousand years and counting, my dear woman.

Douglas Wright

Rabinowitz E-mail Gaffe Goes to 9/11 Widow

By E&P Staff

Published: May 13, 2004

NEW YORK Editors and writers, you need to keep your eye on the ball -- or at least on the keyboard.

Famed Wall Street Journal columnist Dorothy Rabinowitz is red-faced, or worse, today after accidentally sending a scathing e-mail to one of the best known "9/11 widows" that was intended for Tunku Varadarajan, her paper's deputy editorial page editor.

The note was intended for internal consumption, not for the recipient, Rabinowitz explained, the result of hitting the wrong key on her keyboard.

The episode began when Kristen Breitweiser, 33, the 9/11 activist from New Jersey with a high profile these days, submitted an Op-Ed piece to the Journal. Rabinowitz, who sits on the paper's editorial board, composed a note to Varadarajan warning him of "total and complete ... repetitive ... nonsense from people given endless media access to repeat the very same stupid charges, suspicions and the rest. ... this is just an opportunity for these absurd products of the zeitgeist -- women clearly in the grip of the delusion that they know something, have some policy, and wisdom not given to the rest of us to know -- to grab the spotlight. Again."

Apparently Breitweiser's Op Ed charts government failures leading to 9/11. Referring to Rabinowitz, she told The Washington Post, "This woman, I don't know why she hates me so much."

======================================

Subject:

I don't think that you can judge the success of an event based on numbers alone. In this case, the plum was the national media coverage as well as inclusion in the Swiss documentary. Many of us followed the day's events by computer; it was almost as if you were providing the visuals, and an emotional focal point, for a rally that was being conducted in cyberspace (as so much of life is these days).

However, there are those who do look at numbers, and to address that issue when the drones throw it back in your face, how about doing a web-cam cast of the next event? There are cams that do continual video feed as well as still pictures at intervals. Then you could say, So many thousands "attended" by web cam. I don't think it will cut into your physical attendee numbers at all. In fact, the people who do come, now, don't mind having their pictures taken, and more may actually be drawn by the idea of being filmed as a part of history.

Eventually, people will want to come just to hear you speak, and to hear Billy speak, and what better backdrop for Nationalists than some dramatic natural setting out west? Maybe against a background of giant sequoias. Do any of the old Southern plantations rent out space for events? ;- ) I'm all for the party atmosphere myself, bands, beer, etc., but you will need some SA to control the unruly.

Especially the women.

Ed. Note: Much can be done. The number of people on our side matters little at the moment. Germany can gin up 3,000 under more oppressive laws than we have here. So we ain't nothin' from that way of speaking. Yet we are something. And we will be more tomorrow than today. What is required is organization. It is not enough to show up with nothing planned, we must have an organized attack and outreach. What we ARE speaks louder than what we SAY. We showed ourselves good, honest, upright men, and the audience saw this, and so did the media and the opposition. The fact is we are not yet ready for prime time. We must get there. Next rally we are going to close singing "Tomorrow Belongs to Me," so I want everybody to learn that song. We will shame our opponents, and win some of their hearts with it, because of what it is, which music expresses directly, wordlessly. There's no way we can fail to top the contrived lugubriousness of "We Shall Overcome" with our Aryan standard. We had several with cameras at this rally, and certainly it would be a good idea to broadcast it live. Anybody who knows what's involved can step up and do it. I also think regarding these rallies that we may be giving the police too much leeway. I don't like being treated like some plague-carrying bacillus. I don't like being denied rights that are granted to my greasy opponents. I don't like being searched and photographed and checked before I'm loaded at gunpoint on a cattle car to be taken to wherever IN ZOG WE TRUST decides. It may be time to begin thinking about more spontaneous activities, let the cops react to us, rather than us complying with them. I want to get out among the people and talk to them and touch them, and let them see and deal with me. The risk-reward is greater. I don't like being cordoned off. We may need to start renting private halls and putting up posters to attract the public. Charge a buck a head or something cheap. My political rights are not contingent on what is convenient for the police. The cool windbreaker set are so many security guards, no matter the size of their weapons. Killing people without taking responsibility is the dark force of copitude.



Go to :
Reader Mail Index

Back to VNN Main Page