Reader Mail 10

3/11/01

Subject: Angry White Female

    What a wonderful article on white activism from A.W.F.! She even said "Jewish" once, albeit in a merely descriptive sentence. Like she says, a few steps at a time... ;-)

    She caught that liberal quirk we saw in Mississippi Guy's letter -

    "He had internalized the often-repeated myth that people who complain about minorities have simply never experienced diversity."

    Very sharp!

Ed. Note: All VNN writers understand the Jewish issue. A.L.

3/10/01

Subject: Chuck Pearson replies to the Mississippi White Guy

        A Mississippi White Guy writes-

        "Why do you think it is that despite the "Jewish Conspiracy" many anglo saxon males seem to have no problem rising to the top of their fields?"

    They do fine as long as they kiss ass, make all of the obligatory noises, and don't threaten the _status quo_.

        "Rather than dedicate your time to a feeble attempt at creating racial disharmony"

    A. You're assuming that the people here have nothing to do other than to work on this web site. Not so. The web site is a volunteer effort. Everyone here has a job, family, friends, obligations, a life. Who are you to assume that they don't?

    B. The racial disharmony already exists. What you're seeing is far from "feeble;" it's the growing, had-it-up-to-here, will-not-be-silenced White response- in about the only place in the world it's not censored and prohibited. VNN would be ILLEGAL and SHUT DOWN in many countries of the dying White West. Enjoy what may be the only material you'll see today that has not first passed before Jewish eyes for approval.

        "have you ever considered doing something positive for yourself?"

    Again, who are you to assume that the people here are not doing anything positive? This web site is but one small aspect of some very full, interesting, and varied lives. I say of myself, and others like me, "The things many Whites do for amusement are more complicated and difficult than what a lot of people do for a living." Let's put it this way- the last time I moved, I had to sell about THREE THOUSAND books. Don't know how many I kept, or have bought since then. Can't hardly move in here. Again, just one small aspect of a full, interesting, and varied life- my big objection is that there's not enough time to do all of the things I'd like to do. This, while I see others retire and then stand in the middle of their lawn for hours manually holding the automatic sprinkler for lack of anything better to do. Don't talk to me about "positive."

    Have you ever considered doing anything positive for your race?

        "I have found that by applying my energy toward my career I have been very successful."

    Yet again, why are you assuming that others are not doing the same? The people here have careers AND run and contribute to one hell of a web site. That's more than you can say, hm?

    Your objection to VNN is resentful and inarticulate, consisting as it does of repeating, "Get a job." We are all responsible adults, at least as intelligent as you are. We are not your stupid teenager hanging around the house, and we don't need this misdirected, paternal when-are-you-going-to-make-something-out-of-your-life lecture.

        "I live in Mississippi and deal regularly with blacks as well as whites, it has been my experience that skin color has little to do with peoples [sic] morality and character."

    Here we have the classic liberal fallacy- if someone doesn't like something, it can't possibly be because they've tried it and rejected it, because they've investigated it and found it wanting, because they've been subjected to far more of it than they can stand. No! Liberals always assume that if someone doesn't like something, it must be because they've never experienced it! It must be because they don't understand it!

    This is one reason why so many people hate liberals- they treat everyone as though they were complete idiots.

    Are you a liberal? You sure sound like one. That's OK, though, it's not permanent.

    Mississippi? Oh, my! Aren't you the worldly, experienced one! Where in the _hell_ do you suppose that VNN's writers live? Mars? I grew up in, and currently reside in, a CITY where there are MILLIONS of people- census figures say that 4 out of 10 of them are black, and that grows to 10 out of 10 in many areas. Expecting me to say that "Some of my best friends are black?" Don't hold your breath- NONE of my friends are black. Not anymore, and never again. Decades ago, when I was young and naive and believed people like you, I played the "Can we just get along" game, and found it far too expensive in terms of danger, stupidity, stolen property, and police problems. It wasn't my fault, not after a lifetime of steady Jewish indoctrination. I grew out of it ages ago. You need to do the same.

    Blacks woke me up in the morning by putting their loudspeakers out the windows, then I couldn't get out of my building until the police had arrived to clear the 6:30 AM black drinkers out of the hallway, then I had to run a gauntlet of begging, threatening blacks on the way to my train, which was also filled with black beggars and preachers and radio-blasters, acrobats doing handsprings down the aisles.

    The train rolled through a devastated urban landscape, areas consisting mainly of vacant lots sparkling with broken glass, dotted by the occasional overturned, burned-out car, areas where the only remaining businesses were liquor stores. "LOOK OUT! THEY'RE THROWING!" I'd shout, ducking to the floor as strong, grown Negro men hurled fist-sized rocks at the train's windows, their daily battle to drive away the few remaining White taxpayers who support the welfare lifestyle.

    Once downtown, as I walked along with my coffee in a Styrofoam take-out cup, I'd be questioned by wandering Negroes as to my motives and presence. "What _you_ doin' down here?" demanded some ridiculous black loiterer wearing green surgical scrubs and a huge cowboy hat. "It's called work. Try it sometime," I rejoined.

    After I got in my employer's door, I not only had to be very careful of what I said, all day long, because of the radio-worshiping, dope-smoking blacks who worked there, but I got to work nights and weekends fixing everything they screwed up during the week. At 5 PM I got to run the gauntlet in reverse, arriving home again to find black _women_ squatting in my hallway urinating on the floor, and I had no hope of sleep until well after midnight when the police arrived again to quell the live Negro bands playing saxophones and electric guitars at each other from two different apartments.

    You "deal regularly" with blacks? What does that mean? You service vending machines they use? I _lived_ among blacks. It's savagery, chaos, and don't you presume to tell me any different. I went through the equivalent of a war, a long stay in a violent country. Huge men with scarred faces tampering with your front door. Gang proclamations painted seven feet high on the walls. Sarajevo, with a relentless beat, and, thanks to lavish taxpayer funding, it never closes. I could hop on a bus and be right back in the middle of it in an hour.

    "Career moves?" I've enough material for a book on this subject- let me know which Jew-controlled New York publishing house you feel will publish it and help me along the ladder of success. Can you see a White man appearing on Oprah to pitch a book entitled, oh, something like "NIGGER HELL- THE VIEW FROM THE BOTTOM?" How about "AMERICAN CITY- DEATH TRAP FOR WHITES."

        "Hey buddy why the hate?"

    VNN is here because we love our White race and must speak out in its defense.

    As far as hate goes, ask the Jews. For some strange reason, every country in which they live eventually kills or expels them. It must be a coincidence.

        "signed A MISSISSIPPI, CHRISTIAN, GUN NUT, WHITE GUY"

    ...who'll make a good White Nationalist someday! Hang in there; VNN is for you!

Do something positive for yourself; shut off your TV. It is poison. Then challenge and overcome your lifetime of brainwashing the way we all did. Suggested reading- everything on VNN, and-

    "Jewish Involvement in Shaping U.S. Immigration Policy 1881-1965- A Historical Review," by Professor Kevin MacDonald- at-

http://www.p-m-s.freeserve.co.uk/texts/USpol.htm

and everything at Yggdrasil's Library-

http://www.ddc.net/ygg

3/09/0

Subject: O'Reilly

I saw a show the other night. It was The O'Reilly Factor. O'Reilly is a pompous windbag who always makes sure to tell the audience that he's always looking out for ALL Americans, his show is a no spin zone, etc. Commentating on Bush's not wanting to pursue the Clinton pardons, he went on about how if you know something is immoral, then not to say or do anything about it is also immoral. I agree. However, in his case, he is especially immoral by being such a flagrant phony.

Oh, I give him some credit for going after Jesse Jackson. But, that, of course, is not much. Why not go after the people who allow Jackson to have the prestige he has? After all, without air time, who'd know or care about Jesse Jackson? And who decides, for the most part, who gets such publicity? The Jews of course. Also, O'Reilly pursues the Marc Rich pardon, and he also mentioned than pardoning of the 4 Hasidic parasites (but he'll NEVER refer to them as such). What I find sickening, and typical, is 1) a huge percentage of those pardoned were Jews, and 2) O'Reilly feels that Clinton was a corrupt president,and yet he must be aware that Clinton's administration was infested with Jews, but yet he NEVER points out this amazing coincidence.

Anyway, all this is typical for anything in the mainstream. But,I want to talk about a specific topic that was on his show the other night. It had to do with that painting of Christ. It was a naked lady! I think either the "artist" or the lady in the painting, or both were black, but I'm not sure.

Now, I have to believe that many Christians were offended at that. At least that is what many tell me. Now what disgusted me about the show was when O'Reilly was discussing with his guest, some ugly troll , he says something about not supporting art which offends any "religious" groups like Moslems, Christians, and, absolutely of course, Jews. Now a quick question: When have you ever seen a picture, or a work of art, in a public place such as a museum, that offends Jews?

I would like to see that despicable fat hag defend it if instead of a black lady, it was a clean-cut white man wearing a Swastika. Actually, she had the audacity to praise the painting because it was not something typical like a blond-haired, blue-eyed German type! Of course, pick on the German. And another quick question: When have you ever seen Christ depicted in that manner? Blond haired? It was yet one more attack on the white males. Of course, that gutless coward O'Reilly let all that pass. Instead, his main arguement was that he felt he should not have to pay, thru taxes, to support art he did not like, or was offended by. Such a typical coward. I'll tell you what. Why not poop on the floor, draw it, and discuss it's artistic merits. Actually, I would be suprised if some Jewish "artist" did not already do just that! The fact is, that kind of "art", the Jesus painting, and the like, we find repulsive. To philosophicaly discuss it's worth is ridiculous. And the only reason things like that are tolerated at all is because it is not the JEWS that are offended.

Actually, there is a more important point to be made in that regard. Not only is it tolerated because it does not offend the Chosenites, but is pushed precisely BECAUSE it offend Christians. But you know what, I'm glad. I'm glad it offends them. And not so they will one day rise up and get rid of the parasitic, cultural destroyer among us. They will never do that, unless instructed by the TV or by the minister at their church. Well, seeing how the TV is currently in the hands of the aliens, and seeing how even the Pope grovels at their feet, you know neither of those events will happen.

No. I'm glad because the stupid Goy Christians DESERVE to be defecated on. I find it too hard to believe they can be as stupid as they appear; I'm sure a significant amount of cowardice plays a role in their ignorance. You try to tell them of the Jewish role in all this and they accuse you of being "anti-semitic"! No wonder the Jews treat us the way they do.

Paul White

Ed. Note: Cons always pull up short at the question, Cui bono? Whose interests are served by media censorship of "hush" crimes and its amplification of "hate" crimes? The con doesn't care. He points out for the thousandth time that the media is biased, then it's on to dinner. Anything more might threaten his stomach.

3/09/01

Subject: Europe Bans Free Speech

That should be the headline on the front page of every paper in the world, set in end-of-the-world type. This is epochal, earth-shaking, the equivalent of Americans losing their First Amendment protections- but nary a murmur from the controlled press.

Did you catch the part about how one EU official said that criticism of the EU was "extreme blasphemy" that did not fall under the category of protected speech? Translation- EU bureaucrats have, quite simply, decided that they're God- a God with absolutely no sense of humor.

[Anonymous]

3/08/01

Subject: COLUMBINE KILLER ERIC HARRIS LOVED MINORITIES, HATE WHITES

Eric Harris, of Columbine, as quoted by the New York Times, May 1, 1999

THE WORDS Warnings From a Student Turned Killer
By JAMES BARRON

In one of the more intriguing passages, Harris...repeatedly asked readers of the site, "You know what I hate?" One of the answers he gave was, "RACISM!"

He wrote that people who are biased against "blacks, Asians, Mexicans or people from any other country or race besides white-American" should "have their arms ripped off" and be burned.

"Don't let me catch you making fun of someone just because they are a different color," he wrote.

3/7/01

Subject: Revisionist Conference Beirut 2001

March 7, 2001

Preparations for Beirut Meeting Continue on Schedule

ZIONIST GROUPS SEEK TO BAN 'REVISIONISM AND ZIONISM' CONFERENCE

Three major Jewish organizations -- the World Jewish Congress, the Anti-Defamation League, and the Simon Wiesenthal Center -- are demanding that Lebanese authorities ban the forthcoming "Revisionism and Zionism" conference in Beirut, March 31 to April 3, which the Institute for Historical Review is helping to organize. Responding to these demands, the American government and some members of Congress have asked Lebanon to prohibit the four-day meeting, according to the Washington correspondent of the Lebanese daily paper As-Safir (March 3).

Conference organizers report that preparations for the landmark meeting are continuing according to plan, and that Jewish efforts to ban it have little chance of success. Journalists from the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan, Lebanon, Egypt and Iran have already registered with the IHR to cover the event.

"In demanding that Lebanon ban this peaceful, privately-organized meeting, these Zionist groups betray an arrogant double standard," says IHR Director Mark Weber, who points out that similar meetings hosted by the IHR have been held peacefully in the United States for more than 20 years. "That these Jewish groups, ardent supporters of Israel's oppressive and criminal policies, should demand anything of Lebanon, a country that has repeatedly been a victim of Zionist aggression, is an expression of brazen arrogance," adds Weber.

"These Zionist organizations seek to deprive Lebanon of a right that is entirely normal in most of the civilized world, including the USA. It is hypocritical and bullying for American officials to try to prohibit a meeting in Lebanon that would be perfectly legal if held in the United States," says Weber.

"This outrageous effort to suppress freedom of speech and expression further points up the need for just such a conference. We trust that Lebanese authorities will treat this Zionist demand with the contempt that it deserves," says Weber.

Scholars, researchers and activists from a range of countries are scheduled to address the Beirut conference, which will both reflect and further strengthen the growing cooperation between independent scholars in Europe, the United States and Middle East countries. Conference addresses will be given in Arabic, French and English.

Among the speakers will be:

     -- Roger Garaudy, prominent French scholar, author of The Founding Myths of Modern Israel (published in the US by the IHR), for which he was fined $40,000 by a Paris court in 1998.

     -- Robert Faurisson, Europe's leading revisionist scholar, repeatedly persecuted by French authorities for his views

     -- Horst Mahler, well-known German attorney and author.

     -- Fredrick Töben, doctor of philosophy, director of the Adelaide Institute in Australia.

     -- Henri Roques, French scholar and author of a doctoral dissertation on the Gerstein "confessions."

     -- Oleg Platonov, Russian historian.

     -- Mark Weber, IHR Director.

Around the world, and notably in Arab and Muslim countries, awareness has been steadily growing of the way that Israel and Zionist groups exploit "the Holocaust" to blackmail European countries and corporations for billions of dollars for Israel, and to excuse otherwise inexcusable policies of the Jewish state.

The four-day event is being organized by the Swiss revisionist organization Verité et Justice, in cooperation with the IHR. Verité et Justice director Jürgen Graf, who was sentenced by a Swiss court in July 1998 to 15 months imprisonment for "Holocaust denial," has fled his homeland to live in political exile rather than serve the politically-motivated sentence. The 49-year-old educator has recently been in Tehran as a guest of Iranian scholars.

The Institute for Historical Review, founded in 1978 and based in southern California, is a leading independent history research center, well known for publishing serious scholarship disputing "Holocaust" claims. The IHR has tax-exempt, not-for-profit status with the US Internal Revenue Service.

Further information about the Beirut conference, including details about registration, are posted on the "Beirut 2001" section of the IHR web site: http://ihr.org

Institute for Historical Review
P.O. Box 2739
Newport Beach, CA 92659
USA
weber@ihr.org
Tel. 949 - 631 1490

3/07/01

Subject: Reader mail 10

I do not believe that letter was from a white man or one over 25. Its of no matter of course and it was instructive for the brain dead who may visit your site. That internet Nation off England is interesting. Listen up, Mad cow disease is really out of control and I have not eaten feed lot animals for 25 years. Hope you guys are safe and learning to like tofu. Maybe this will be the die off that AIDS was supposed to be. The blacks are in our face now, always demanding, and its really not funny. Our real problem is our own brain dead people. Women voting is the real cause of the Jews getting the upper hand on U.S. A grass roots environmental organization that I gave $70 dollars to four years ago. Will not even consider talking about immigration Its really white affluence to blame they should off themselves I grew up poor and this privileged pricks hate their ancestors. they have prided deserves in helping to expose all the other phony money grabbing leftist clubs. And believe never has this organization had a Jew in or any blacks, beaners etc. Tim Hermach the fearless leader whom will not talk to me is married to a Japanese American. As you the Japanese would never allow this invasion to happen to them. After a long marriage to a white woman and having beautiful daughters. Back in the mid eighties they posed for play boy at O.S.U. in Corvallis.Dr Pierce knows where that is. He did not object to it sick. Any way my point is that none of this groups not one can connect immigration to the forest. They are full of third world breeding shit cowards to get their contributions. I am not going to the gulag. One thing for sure, this treasonous invasions is so big now it can't be hidden. 98% of our Judges are moral midgets for prosecuting whites who do pranks,but not violence. Think about this, Jewduges let off blacks and Jews who fake hate crimes with a slap on the wrist. It happened in Reedsport Ore about four years. A Jew couple spray painted their car with Nazi stuff and feces and wrecked their Apt. Went to Eugene The Fag town and told the press how bad Reedsport is and it made CNN. Well guess what the owner had installed security cameras and caught them. I think they got off on a fine and damages. But I know for sure no jail time. No ten years for these Kikes. Joe.

3/07/01

Subject: Marriage

Hello, I saw your thing on being married. Im 26 and not married and what you said is true. Being single is not usually a real life porn film. its lonely pretty often. The media like to portray it otherwise. great site. Adam

3/07/01

Subject: Immigration in Paradise

Dear Mr Linder

You know how it is, everytime you turn on jewvision, or open a jewspaper, or read some jew published magazine, you have some jew or jew lap-dog extolling and expounding upon the enormous benefits of "diversity" to our everyday lives in general. We also know that the jews are shameless, unrivalled liars and hypocrites, and those traits are a manifestation of their genetic predisposition toward wrecking functioning societies.

While they piously preach to us about how selfish and evil and hateful White Gentiles are for resisting a mud and turd-world invasion of the once proud United States, we have this small item that was buried in Monday's (05 March 01) jewrusalem post:

***

Interior Ministry tightens immigration rules

New immigrants who have converted to Judaism will no longer be able to bring non-Jewish family members into the country, according to a new rule set down by the Interior Ministry.

The rule went into effect several days ago, following an order issued by Attorney-General Elyakim Rubinstein, according to an Army Radio report.

The decision is expected to cut by half the amount of eligible immigrants to Israel.

Herzl Golan, head of the ministries' population registry, termed the step 'revolutionary,' and said it would have far-reaching consequences on the scope of immigration to Israel.

www.jpost.com/Editions/2001/03/05/LatestNews/LatestNews.22421.html

***

Now there's a love of diversity for ya !

And I like that last paragraph - textbook non-committal non-speak.
Keeping immigrant relatives out of israel is "revolutionary" (huh?) and "would have far-reaching consequences on the scope of immigration to israel." Yeah, hehe. Translated from the yid bureau-speak that can be rendered as "we're finally gonna stop permitting entry to those tough Russian goys, who have a most disturbing tendency to knock dishonest, whimpering kikes flat on their ass."

The jews GLORIFY every mestizo, haitian, african nigger and asian who manages to float his raft onto our beaches or sprint across a barely patrolled land border - those things are GOOD for us, we are continually assured by the self-chosen.
But, on the other hand, when certain foreigners who have applied to israeli authorities for permission to immigrate (Russians, I presume) and might want to bring along a non-kike cousin or uncle, they are now being told oh nooooo, we can't have that, that wiould detrimentally change the complexion of the country !

Yeah.....AND?????

So what's the problem there, shlomo?

The hebes regularly tell us that that ugly result is eminently desirable and should be a cause for JOYFUL CELEBRATION in the USSA !

What possible justification could the khazars come up with to explain away this paradox? None, of course. Hence the brief paragraph in the jew post. The hymies have to be able to say that they did publicly announce their new immigration policy, but they are gonna do their damnedest to keep it as quiet as possible. You understand, of course.

"One standard for jews, another standard for everyone else".

Regards
Mark Konrad

Great site. Best wishes, and keep up the outstanding effort, it IS widely read and appreciated. MK

3/6/01

Subject: NEWS FLASH!

Date Line: Staten Island 2001

NEWS FLASH!

Jews tell the truth!

In an incredible turnabout, Jews have actually decided to tell the truth. This unprecedented action came after National Alliance fliers were found inside a Staten Island Real Estate Properties magazine in a lobby rack of SI Bank & Trust on Forest Avenue. Etzion Neuer, assistant director of the Anti-Defamation League's New York office was quoted as saying:

      "There is a real possibility the message is getting out to
      other people, and that's something we're concerned
      about."

No doubt! Y_w__h forbid that the American bovine be awakened form their deep slumber while the parasites continue to suck their life blood, but don't expect this trend in truth to continue. This comment was in all probability a slip up by the ADL and will no doubt be followed on by gushing comments about how the Jews actually support all America's first amendment rights in much the same way the JPFO actually support America's second amendment rights. In a recent unofficial poll it was revealed that both Sol Wienstein and Bernie Farber support the first and second amendment rights for all Americans. Abe Foxman and Elie Weasel immediately responded with the comment: "We're goink to haff a talk with Sol and Bernie about their unusual beliefs. Sol and Bernie are reasonable men so I think in all probability ve can reach an agreement on this matter."

Arch Stanton

3/5/01

Subject: Your Site

Why do you think it is that despite the "Jewish Conspiracy" many anglo saxon males seem to have no problem rising to the top of their fields?

Non sequitur. The two aren't related except in certain key areas. Whites are free to rise to the top of veterinary science, apiculture, Widgets Inc.: anything non-political. They are not free to rise to the top in journalism without toeing the company line: ie, no criticism of Jews, no genuine resistance to the encroachments of leftism. You may not believe that, but I'm guessing that, unlike me, you aren't a journalist, and, unlike me, you haven't worked for mainstream conservative publications, and that, unlike me, you don't know, really know, how the people at the top of public conservatism think. Just imagine, I know it sounds weird, but just imagine I know more than you do about this, and that I might be right. That would be a better working assumption for you to go on than that I'm one of those "haters" the media and minister tell you I am. How do you know what motivates me? Why not emerge from your cocoon of smugness and ask yourself how you know that I'm not motivated by love? Because paper and pulpit and president tell you otherwise?

The question you ought to ask yourself is why you put "Jewish conspiracy" in quotation marks. Or why, in much of the White West, it's illegal to question the "Holocaust." Or why, worldwide, Jews are working so hard to install and make mandatory browser filters, and to get "hate" sites kicked off the Web, and to criminalize free speech. Why don't you worry about these things instead of the "hate" you suppose (neatly in line with censors' wishes) motivates us at VNN?

If you aren't open minded enough to consider that a Jewish conspiracy exists (note we never speak of conspiracy; it's more a matter of a tiny, cohesive minority appearing conspiratorial because it instinctively works toward the same ends, now openly, now secretly), then you shouldn't be asking the question. Either Jewish control of the media and Jewish double standards are real issues, or they aren't. We know they are, and we prove it every day on VNN with objective evidence taken out of the mouths and organs of the Jews themselves.

You can side with the liberals and dismiss our acidic approach as "hate" but that won't get the job done logically. But who needs logic and evidence these days, of course. And if we stir up the animals with rhetoric about niggers, well, maybe some of the White cowards standing by in Seattle and Philadelphia while White women were punched and stomped by niggers need to be shocked into action. Perhaps you and your minister wouldn't understand that, but we aren't Christians, and we don't believe in turning the other cheek.


Rather than dedicate your time to a feeble attempt at creating racial disharmony

Niggers beat/stomp Whites into the ground. The paper hushes it up and calls them "young men." We call them niggers. We're the problem. Like all liberals, you are more bothered by the term 'nigger' than the actions of niggers.

have you ever considered doing something positive for yourself?

Sure: Vanguard News Network.

I have found that by applying my energy toward my career I have been very successful.

Good for you. But those of us in journalism/media face a rather different set of circumstances than you do in your field.

I live in Mississippi and deal regularly with blacks as well as whites, it has been my experience that skin color has little to do with peoples morality and character.

Do you live in a black neighborhood? Or a white one?... That's what I thought.

Hey buddy why the hate?

Hey buddy your country's being stolen out from under you by a lying Jewish elite that supplies you the very terms you use to denounce the few trying to prevent it. Why the "love"?

signed
A MISSISSIPPI, CHRISTIAN, GUN NUT, WHITE GUY

Go to :
Reader Mail Index

Back to VNN Main Page

Click Here!