Reader Mail 139

Letters through 6/1/02



======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject:

======================================

Subject: Ebert, compare to Rivers main page...

"The use of the neo-Nazis is politically correct: Best to invent villains who won't offend any audiences."

Paramount Pictures presents a film directed by Phil Alden Robinson. Written by Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne. Based on the novel by Tom Clancy. Running time: 119 minutes. Rated PG-13 (for violence, disaster images and brief strong language). Opening today at local theaters.

The Sum of All Fears

REVIEWD BY ROGER EBERT

Oh, for the innocent days when a movie like "The Sum of All Fears" could be enjoyed as a "thriller." In these dark times, it is not a thriller but a confirmer, confirming our fears that the world is headed for disaster. The film is about the detonation of a nuclear device in an American city. No less an authority than Warren Buffet recently gave a speech in which he flatly stated that such an event was "inevitable." Movies like "Black Sunday" could exorcise our fears, but this one works instead to give them form.

To be sure, Tom Clancy's horrifying vision has been footnoted with the obligatory Hollywood happy ending, in which world war is averted and an attractive young couple pledge love while sitting on a blanket in the sunshine on the White House lawn. We can walk out smiling, unless we remember that much of Baltimore is radioactive rubble. Human nature is a wonderful thing. The reason the ending is happy is because we in the audience assume we'll be the two on the blanket, not the countless who've been vaporized.

The movie is based on another of Clancy's fearfully factual stories about Jack Ryan, the CIA agent, this time a good deal younger than Harrison Ford's Ryan in "A Clear and Present Danger" and played by Ben Affleck. It follows the ancient convention in which the hero goes everywhere important and personally performs most of the crucial actions, but it feels less contrived because Clancy has expertise about warfare and national security issues; the plot is a device to get us from one packet of information to another.

The story: In 1973, an Israeli airplane carrying a nuclear bomb crashes in Syria. Many years later, the unexploded bomb is dug up, goes on the black market, and is sold to a right-wing fanatic who has a theory: "Hitler was stupid. He fought America and Russia, instead of letting them fight one another." The fanatic's plan is to start a nuclear exchange between the superpowers, after which Aryan fascists would pick up the pieces.

The use of the neo-Nazis is politically correct: Best to invent villains who won't offend any audiences. This movie can play in Syria, Saudi Arabia and Iraq without getting walkouts. It's more likely that if a bomb ever does go off in a big city, the perpetrators will be True Believers whose certainty about the next world gives them, they think, the right to kill us in this one.

In the film, Ryan becomes a sort of unofficial protege of Bill Cabot (Morgan Freeman), a high-level CIA official and good guy who maintains a "back channel" into the Kremlin to avoid just such misunderstandings as occur. Ryan and Cabot fly to Moscow when a new president assumes power, and the new Soviet leader (Ciaran Hinds) is shown as a reasonable man who must take unreasonable actions (like invading Chechnya) to placate the militarists in his government.

America is being run by President Fowler (tall, Lincolnesque James Cromwell), who is surrounded by advisors cast with some of the most convincing character actors in the movies: Philip Baker Hall, Alan Bates, Bruce McGill, etc. Crucial scenes take place aboard Air Force One after Baltimore has been bombed, and we see the president and his cabinet not in cool analytical discussions but all shouting at once. Somehow I am reassured by the notion that our leaders might be really upset at such a time; anyone who can be dispassionate about nuclear war is probably able to countenance one.

There are some frightening special effects in the movie, which I will not describe, because their unexpected appearance has such an effect. There are also several parallel story lines, including one involving a particularly skilled dirty tricks specialist named John Clark (Liev Schreiber) who I am glad to have on our side. There are also the usual frustrations in which the man with the truth can't get through because of bureaucracy.

Against these strengths are some weaknesses. I think Jack Ryan's one-man actions in post-bomb Baltimore are unlikely and way too well-timed. I doubt he would find evildoers still hanging around the scene of their crime. I am not sure all of the threads--identifying the plutonium, finding the shipping manifest and invoice, tracking down the guy who dug up the bomb--could take place with such gratifying precision. And I smile wearily at the necessity of supplying Jack with a girlfriend (Bridget Moynahan), who exists only so that she can (1) be impatient when he is called away from dates on official business; (2) disbelieve his alibis; (3) be heroic; (4) be worried about him; (5) be smudged with blood and dirt, and (6) populate the happy ending. We are so aware of the character's function that we can hardly believe her as a person.

These details are not fatal to the film. Director Phil Alden Robinson and his writers, Paul Attanasio and Daniel Pyne, do a spellbinding job of cranking up the tension, they create a portrait of convincing realism, and then they add the other stuff because, well, if anybody ever makes a movie like this without the obligatory Hollywood softeners, audiences might flee the theater in despair. My own fear is that in the post-apocalyptic future, "The Sum of All Fears" will be seen as touchingly optimistic.

======================================

Subject: killer bzeez

bees or boolies, african wildlife does not belong outside of africa

Hybrid African bees killed picnicker

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Saturday, June 1, 2002

COLLEGE STATION -- The bees that killed an El Campo woman this week were a mix of Africanized and European honey bees, the Texas Apiary Inspection Service said Friday.

"There were a huge number of bees in two nests," said Paul Jackson, who heads the agency at Texas A&M University.

The agency, which regulates Texas bee laws, concluded that Francis Hernandez, 36, was stung more than 250 times by a hybrid bee known as an Africanized Honey Bee-European. Hernandez was attacked Monday during a picnic at her home.

http://www.austin360.com/statesman/editions/today/metro_state_12.html

======================================

Subject: book reviews

Great book reviews, just read a few. The one about the "Last Dispatches from White Africa" underscore what a bunch of pathetic, mentally deranged, swine the British are !!!

Ed. Note: Whites are Whites, and we must pull together as a race, as we are under attack as a race. That does not mean that any ANY individual is beyond questioning or criticism, nor any subgroup. But let's keep our focus on our unity and their destruction.

======================================

Subject: Mexicans enrich our culture

The tortilla boys'll stop at nothing to keep growing our economy. And a big economy is the name of the game, right?

Customers continue business despite dying man on store floor

Friday, May 31, 2002

©2002 Associated Press

(05-31) 10:38 PDT SANTA CRUZ, Calif. (AP) --

Customers continued their business at a convenience store, stepping over a man dying on the floor with a gunshot wound to the head.

Pablo Lopez Jarquin, 23, was shot in the back of the head Tuesday at Rosy's Market & Taqueria, in what police believe was a gang-related slaying. He died later that night at a hospital.

Surveillance tape shows two men cornering Jarquin and a third shooting him with a handgun.

======================================

Subject: execute Whitey

You can almost hear it: "Shewww! Finally, a white guy to help diversify death row!" How come the only places whites count as "diversity" is in places like prison and in programs like execution? This seems to be the one area in which they are actively recruiting honkeys.

May 31, 2002

Md. Man Gets Death for Cop Murders

SALISBURY, Md.- A man with a history of mental illness was sentenced to death for gunning down two lawmen who were investigating a noise complaint.

Francis Zito, 43, sat motionless as the verdict was read Thursday.

"I only wish Mr. Zito would've shown some remorse, but he never did," said Charles Schwenz, the father of one of the victims.

Gov. Parris Glendening last month set a moratorium on executions while a study is conducted to determine if the death penalty is fairly applied. Glendening, a death penalty supporter, cited concerns about possible racial and geographic bias in the cases of the 13 men awaiting execution. The moratorium does not prevent the handing down of death sentences.

======================================

Subject: promo troll emerges

A ghastly troll crawls out from under the bridge and ventures to defend the criminal state

Divest and Conquer

By ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ

A nasty and immoral campaign is being waged around the world to damage Israel's economy by coercing universities and other institutions into divesting their holdings in Israel, as some of them did from South Africa during the apartheid regime. There is no justification for the comparison between the two, and the divestment effort should be opposed by anyone who supports human rights.

As fair-minded observers understand, the two cases are entirely different. South African apartheid was a racist system by which a minority controlled and subjugated a disenfranchised majority. The campaign for South African divestment was inspired and joined by long-term advocates of neutral support for human rights across the board. Israel, by contrast, is a functioning democracy that guarantees full equality before the law to all its citizens, regardless of race, ethnicity or religion. The anti-Israel divestment campaign has been inspired by pleaders with a particular animus toward Israel and little commitment to human rights in general.

The intellectual leader of this campaign is none other than Noam Chomsky, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology linguist, who has long favored the abolition of the state of Israel and the substitution of a "secular, binational state" based, it seems, on the model of Lebanon. This is the same Chomsky who has defended the "findings" of the notorious French antisemite and Holocaust denier Robert Faurisson, who claims "the Jews" were responsible for World War II. Chomsky has said that he saw "no hint of antisemitic implications in Faurisson's works," including his denial of the Holocaust, which Chomsky claims is based on "extensive historical research." Chomsky went so far as to write an introduction to one of Faurisson's antisemitic books.

Of course, Chomsky is not alone in his divest-from-Israel campaign. He is joined in his ignoble effort by a motley assortment of knee-jerk anti-Zionists, rabid America-haters, radical leftists such as the Trotskyist Spartacist League and even a few of Chomsky's former students who now teach in Israel. Some in this movement would take the money now invested in the Middle East's only democracy and have it sent to "progressive" states ÷ countries such as Iraq, Libya, Syria, Cuba and the Palestinian Authority, which support and finance terrorism.

Thankfully, the divestment effort has garnered little support so far among respectable human rights advocates. Here in Cambridge, Mass., on Chomsky's home turf, a petition demanding divestment from Harvard and MIT garnered just 412 signatures from among students, faculty, staff and alumni of the two institutions, while more than 5,300 signed petitions opposing divestment. The result should surprise no one. There is no intellectually or morally defensible case for singling out Israel for divestiture. Universities invest in a wide array of companies that have operations in countries all over the world, including many that systematically violate the human rights of millions of people. And these other countries are not defending themselves against those who would destroy them and target their civilians. Yet this petition focuses only on the Jewish state, to the exclusion of all others, including those that ÷ by any reasonable standard ÷ are among the worst violators of human rights.

As an advocate, teacher and student of human rights for almost 40 years, I feel confident in asserting that Israel's record on human rights is among the best in the world, especially among nations that have confronted comparable threats.

Israel has the only independent judiciary in the entire Middle East. Its Supreme Court, one of the most highly regarded in the world, is the only court in the Middle East from which an Arab or a Muslim can expect justice, as many have found in winning dozens of victories against the Israeli government, the Israeli military and individual Israeli citizens. There is no more important component in the protection of human rights and civil liberties than an independent judiciary willing to stand up to its own government. I challenge the proponents of divestment to name a court in any Arab or Muslim country that is comparable to the Israeli Supreme Court.

As the only true democracy in the Middle East, Israel is the only country in the region that has virtually unlimited freedom of speech. Any person in Israel ÷ whether Jewish, Muslim or Christian ÷ can criticize the Israeli government and its leaders. No citizen of any other Middle Eastern or Muslim state can do that without fear of imprisonment or death. As one wag recently put it, citizens of Israel and the Palestinian Authority have exactly the same right of free speech ÷ both may criticize Israel and praise Yasser Arafat.

Israel is the only country in the world that has openly confronted the difficult issue of protecting the civil liberties of the ticking bomb terrorist The Israeli Supreme Court recently ruled that despite the potential benefits of employing "physical pressure" (that is, using non-lethal torture in order to extract information), such pressure is now illegal in Israel. Brutal torture, including lethal torture, is commonplace in nearly every other Middle Eastern and Muslim country. Indeed, American authorities sometimes send suspects to Egypt, Jordan and the Philippines precisely because they know that they will be tortured in those countries.

The list could go on and on, and by every single standard Israel would surpass other countries against which no divestiture petition has been directed To be sure, Israel is far from perfect. I have been critical of some of its policies, as have countless Israeli citizens. Crucially, there are mechanisms within Israel for improving its civil liberties and human rights record. These mechanisms do not exist in other Middle Eastern and Muslim nations.

Even when judged against European nations, Israel's human rights record does very well. It is far better than that of France on virtually any criterion, even if one forgets about the Algerian War, in which the French military tortured and murdered thousands of people. It is least as good as the British record in dealing with terrorism in Northern Ireland. The Israeli legal system is far superior to that of Italy, Spain and many other European countries.

There are, of course, difficult issues to be resolved between Israel and the Palestinians. These include the future of the settlements, the establishment of Palestinian self-governance and the prevention of terrorism. These issues will require compromise on all sides. Americans are and must be free to criticize Israel when they disagree with its policies or actions, as they criticize any other country in the world whose record is not perfect. But to single out the Jewish state of Israel, as if it were the worst human rights offender, is bigotry pure and simple. Those who sign the Chomsky petition should be ashamed of themselves. If they are not, it is up to others to shame them.

Here's an alternative to singling out Israel for divestment: Let universities choose nations for investment in the order of the human rights records. If that were done, investment in Israel would increase dramatically, while investments in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Philippines, Indonesia, the Palestinian Authority and most other countries of the world would decrease dramatically.

I challenge Noam Chomsky to a public debate on whether universities should invest in or divest from companies that do business with Israel and other countries.

======================================

Subject: future of israel

Ha'aretz is sounding really depressed and somber over the future of jews/israel lately, although The J Post keeps right on whistlin'. . . But I like that smugness out of them, THOSE are the types who help keep us all highly motivated . . .

K Here.

======================================

Subject: Milgram experiment

Alex,

The psych experiment you were thinking in connection with the WB "Candid Camera" show was the (Stanley) Milgram Experiment.

http://www.new-life.net/milgram.htm

Ed. Note: Thanks, very helpful. Most people are biologically unable to think for themselves. Such thinking as they do consists in knitting sense of precut labels mass-mailed to them by the Jews controlling the media.

======================================

Subject: Colson article

Colson's second option is the only one that makes sense: if it is possible to imprison all our people's enemies, we certainly should. If they are imprisoned in remote, escape-proof areas and also separated permanently by gender--men in men's prisons, women in women's prisons--then murderous genocide will not be necessary at all. Their kind will simply disappear through lack of reproduction inside our state. Then we'll need only to protect our borders from invasion without. Why should we sink to the level of the Communists in the U. S. S. R. ? We should try to cure and straighten out as many Whites as possible who have had their thinking vitiated through an ultra-potent brainwashing social system. Many of these Whites were simply unlucky enough to be born into a corrupting society.

======================================

Subject: CPTWC

CPTWC's Weekly E-list / Number 23 / For Sun., June 2, 2002

Please send to a friend.

-----

Contents:

1 Quote

3 E-list items (topics, in order: Jews Should Be Expelled From Mild "White" Groups/Websites; Halliday's Excellent Point; Jews Push Speech-As-Crime Idea)

---------

This week's quote:

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus, Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krasin or Radek--all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing...."

--Winston Churchill on the Jews; article titled ""Zionism versus Bolshevism: A Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People," by W. Churchill, Illustrated Sunday Herald newspaper, February 8, 1920, p. 5.

------------------------------

Jews Should Be Expelled From Mild "White" Groups/Websites

Contrary to popular belief, Jews -- as a race -- are not "White" [1]. Also, they have a long history of disloyalty to anyone but their own kind.

So why, then, are Jews found within mild-mannered "pro-White" groups and websites in America? Good question. We would like to know ourselves.

We were surprised to find that some "pro-White" or "pro-European" groups and websites/periodicals in America actually have quite a few Jews within them. And, there is evidence that these pro-White outfits know about the negative history of Jews but refuse to expel Jews due to the usual charges of "anti-Semitism" that would follow such an expelling.

How sad. Because these pro-Whites groups/websites fail to grasp at least several important features about this matter.

1) these Jews within pro-White groups/websites may indeed be passing on sensitive information about those pro-White entities to various Jewish organizations; or, at least, they may be mentioning sensitive topics to Jewish friends, who in turn pass such information on to Jewish organizations;

2) How will other White nationalists get the vital message that Jews are a non-White race if White groups/websites include Jews? They won't.

3) Jews now inside these pro-White groups/websites will attract more Jews to these White outfits, by suggesting by their presence that the atmosphere within such a White entity is "Jew-friendly."

The bottom line is that these pro-White groups/websites are in deep denial about what Jews are, and the danger that they pose. Until all Whites create a separate WHITE culture for themselves that EXCLUDES all non-Whites -- including most importantly Jews -- their effectiveness as nationalist operatives will be very limited.

CPTWC calls on all pro-White groups and websites to expel all Jews from their ranks and contacts ASAP -- all of them. Even the "nice" Jews. The pro-White groups could rewrite their organization by-laws so that they exclude everyone but White Europeans from their group(s). Pro-White websites can do similar with their writers. This will eliminate the need for the "unpleasant" task of asking individual Jews to take a hike to groups and websites that have no racial standards.

It seems funny that we should have to make such a challenge to pro-White entities in the first place. After all, these White outfits claim to be championing the White European cause, right? What could possibly be more beneficial to a pro-White group or website than removing non-Whites? In fact, it would seem to be their DUTY to remove those non-Whites called Jews.

[1] Book "Race," by John R. Baker, Oxford U./FHU presses, 1974/1981; pages 238ff, hardcover; notes that most modern Jews are Ashkenazim Jews; Baker lists those Ashkenazim Jews as a hybrid race, mainly "Armenid/Orientalid," meaning Armenid/Arab; "light-skinned Arabs" would also be a good description of those Jews. The light skin of modern Jews comes from them having lived in Europe for centuries. However, they are not racially White; Baker's book features many physical details of Jews vs. White Europeans, e.g. their unique noses, skulls -- more rounded at the temples; lips; ears being larger, etc.

---------------------------

Halliday's Excellent Point

A writer who's work is found at VNN makes a great point about how the political Left is not interested in "democracy" as such, even though that Left daily blathers about how it wants "democracy."

Jack Halliday's essay is called "BLACKOUT: THE MULTICULTURAL LEFT, THE BEANBAG RIGHT, AND THE END OF WHITE -- An Essay on the Rise of the Affenkultur and the Fall of the White Man, Including Reflections on Race, the Media and the Cultural Future of the United States, " by Halliday; see it at http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/blackout.htm. (quoting Halliday) "Again, I point out that, at root, the left is anti-democratic because it does not recognize disagreement as legitimate. There is no middle ground in its political stereotyping: either you are Good, a supporter of the new Multicultural Orthodoxy, or you are Bad, an evil racist." (endquote).

This observation is similar to a different one -- author unknown -- which we quote at times, since it is scribbled on a piece of paper hanging above Colson's computer: "Leftist definition of democracy: the absence of any opposition to their leftist ideas."

Recall Chile, 1972-73 -- Chilean leader Allende had already forged strong ties with both Cuba and the Soviets, and was ordering Marxist decrees for all of Chile. Everyone with half a brain knew that Allende was a Commie posing as a mere leftist. But the global Left kept moaning about how Chile was a "democracy." By their definition, it was: there was no opposition to Marxist/leftist ideas in Chile at that time -- or very little, at least.

But the Christian Right ignores this well-known leftist feature -- of the left not wanting democracy -- and, as VNN says, still plays beanbag with that Left in general, never getting tough with them, playing too nice 'cause after all, Jesus said "love your enemies, etc., etc."

What denial those Christians are in.

We say that the Christian Right is aiding and abetting our Republic's demise by playing footsie with Jews and the Left instead of declaring war on them. We guess that those Christians feel that America is not worth fighting for.

As Dad always says: "never fight a war half-assed. Either fight for keeps or stay home." Well, what will it be, good Christians? Fight, or stay home?

-----------------------------------

Jewish Groups Push Speech-As-Crime Idea

A recent item on Overthrow.com -- 5-26-02 -- told a disturbing tale: Jewish groups are starting to push the idea that mere words are intimidation, and intimidation is illegal, hence certain speech is illegal in America if Jews don't like it.

A novel approach, but then Jews are a novelty.

These days, Jews have helped create "hate crime task forces" inside of many American police departments. Those cops go out and track down people who pass out "racist" flyers, even if -- and this is key -- such distribution of flyers IS NOT ILLEGAL.

Yep. That just happened in Boston, Mass., read about it here:

Here.

That news article even notes that such distribution of "racist" flyers is not illegal. Our question: if that activity is not illegal, why is law enforcement -- paid for by your non-Jewish tax dollars -- investigating such distribution of racist flyers? The answer of course is that organized Jewish groups, who have amazing political clout, want the police to investigate such activity. So the police do. Simple.

Overthrow.com rightly noted that only Jews have been doing this -- trying to criminalize mere speech. No other ethnic groups have so attacked the First Amendment as Jews have. Many Whites confidently predict that, over time, certain speech that the powerful Jews don't like will become illegal, despite our First Amendment within the Bill of Rights.

America = Israel II.

======================================

Subject: dual loyalty; well, not really

May. 31, 2002

US students learn how to defend Israel

By TOVAH LAZAROFF

Pictures of IDF soldiers gunning down Palestinians with the statement "this is what you can do on birthright" were plastered this March across Cornell University Campus in response to a campaign for birthright israel, a program that brings thousands of Jewish students annually to Israel.

At New York University, the Muslim student groups put two articles on their Web site blaming the September 11 attack on the Twin Towers on Jewish supremacy and the mistreatment of the Palestinians by the Israelis.

"As things have gotten worse in Israel, things have gotten worse [for Jews] in the US," said Ruthie Warshenbrot, of the University of North Carolina, one of 400 US Hillel students who spent this week in Israel learning how to combat what, according to the Anti-Defamation League, is a 25 percent hike in anti-Semitism in 2001.

The trip was jointly organized by Hillel and the Jewish Agency's "Israel Experience" company. Students did some volunteer work and met with officials, academics, and the IDF to help bolster their advocacy skills to combat anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda, and to help students on their home campuses identify with Israel.

Hillel member Aviva Kiesser, who just finished her junior year at Rutgers University in New Jersey, said that on her campus there is a feeling that Zionism is racism and that Israel is an apartheid state. She and other students described how on their campuses they often find themselves in verbal battles with Muslim groups. Debate quickly becomes a monologue, Kiesser said.

Benjy Weiss, who just finished his junior year at Cornell University, said he feels the Jewish students are often on the defensive and simply reacting to incidents started by the Muslims groups.

Warshenbrot said there is a scant Muslim presence on her campus. It's the Jewish groups who are standing out there against Israel holding signs saying: "Down with the occupation," she said. "One of the most frustrating things for me as an American student is that we have been working on counteracting all of this negativity and hostility for nearly two years," Kiesser said. "It feels like our family in Israel isn't hearing that. They think we aren't doing anything when we are working hard. We are passionate and committed and that message is not getting across."

======================================

Subject: jewish aid

hmm alex get this

"Jewish woman suspected of aiding Rishon suicide bomber By Ha'aretz Staff"

Here.

Tim K

======================================

Subject: webro network

Alex,

Interesting television viewing on thursday the 30th on the WB (We're Black)Network. Jaime Kennedy, an extremely funny White comedian has come up with a modified "Candid Camera" type show where individuals and groups are led to believe something absurd is taking place when it's really just a mind-fuck. For example, a group of Hollywood tourist types are given free tickets to attend the filming of a game show pilot where the contestants are given an electric shock if they fail to answer the questions properly. Mr. Kennedy plays the part of the contestant receiving the shocks and does so quite convincingly while the other contestant receives no shock ('the chair is broken, so pretend you're being shocked'the bogus production assistant tells him) It ends when Mr. Kennedy, crying and pretending to be in extreme pain attacks the other contestant.

When the people being fooled are let in on the secret, they laugh and hold their hands over there slack jaws.

Silly people.

I laughed really hard, not so much at the antics of Mr. Kennedy, who was very convincing playing everthing from a fat, Black Oprah type to a tour guide who breaks in to a celebrity's home along with the entire tour bus full of, well, tourists.

What I found to be particularly enlightening was the fact that in each and every case, the people were not only easily fooled, but eager, in most cases to go along with the anti-social behavior, i.e. administering painful electrical shocks to a stranger, breaking into someones home and stealing items, etc. Yeah, I know, it's TV, but even TV can't make talentless schlubs into actors. The people being fooled, truly were being fooled and quite easily.

Hollywood. Who knows how to lie and deceive and make it all look as if it is real better than Hollywood.

Did anyone think it was a coincidence that the Thomasons were called in by the Clintons before the BIG FAT SAGGY ASSED PERVERT IN CHIEF went on TV to wag his finger in our faces?

HMMM... What have we learned from this? That anyone with a budget (and if you think that the WB has a big budget, you're whacked)and an agenda, can get anyone they want on board. Not one person stood up and complained or tried to stop someone from doing something that was so obviously wrong it made me sit up and take notice.

Do we understand why so few people understand the truth? Do we wonder why the media is so badly exploited by the enemy?

They get it. They know that to make something real, all that is neccessary is to pretend authentically.

That's it. No big secret.

You can get a total rube right off the street to electrocute a stranger and then lie about it convincingly. You can get twenty people to break into a strangers home and ransack it. You can get an entire nation to tear apart their own culture and do it to a rap beat. You could probably get a White Christian father to drop his teenage daughter off at a NBA gang-bang, or get a kid to turn in their parents for "intolerant" views if there was a prize in it, or a chance to be on a TV pilot.

Man, do we need to look into this as a recruiting tool. Maybe we could set up a bogus Jaime Kennedy Experiment and then show people how easily they can be deceived and lied to. Then proceed to show them just how badly they have been deceived.

I don't know and I have no answers, but I got a big dose of reality/fantasy and a heads up on just how obtuse and dull the sheeple have become.

MM

Ed. Note: The shocking is a take off on a famous psych experiment I've forgotten the name of. As long as a guy in a white coat assured them what they were doing was necessary, they were more than happy to turn up the pain dial. People are weak, and they enjoy hurting others. And it causes most of them intense pain to stand against the group. That is why it is necessary for intelligent and tough people to counterweight the morons. Without a genetically in-built bias in favor of getting along with others, human society would be difficult, but the leadability makes for danger when the jew's behind the megaphone.

======================================

Subject: doing the needful...

Alex: You'll Find This Piquant:

HENRI COSTON

Doing the Needful [An Allegory]. If we should discover, one day, that we had been the victims of a poisoning, would it be prudent of us to seek assistance from the very person who had administered the poison to us in the first place? I don't think so! On the contrary, we would do everything in our power to contact a trusted friend's doctor, hoping that he might do the impossible, might pull us through our ordeal and might even succeed in his attempt to save us. That's logical.

The Moral? Instead of trusting to the good offices of the poisoner or those of his accomplice: go ahead and strangle both of them!

======================================

Subject: elite infiltration

Re: my article about infiltrating White elites -- here's a target -- the Hamptons. Be warned, to do such a thing you have to have utmost emotional security in yourself, have your own family and friends, otherwise you will be lonely and needy, which is the cardinal sin in such an environment.

http://www.salon.com/ent/tv/review/2002/06/01/hamptons/index.html

Don't concern yourself so much with concrete plans of what you are going to do, just go there, ply your trade and let things play out, because play out they will. Your invisible presence would make a good opportunity to throw NA leaflets (see http://www.jeffsarchive.com and click on Flyers).

======================================

Subject: vote Ed

Dear VNN,
That the EU is an evil, dictatorial entity is well known.But after reading your recently featured article proposing the admission of Israel to the EU, criminally insane must be the best description of the EU.

Honestly, I'd rather have someone of the mental caliber of Ed Gein running Europe, than anyone of the ass-clowns we have at the moment.

I'd like to remind all Englishmen reading this message to fight, fight and fight again the EU, give it no quarter, don't rest till it is utterly destroyed.

Kenny Jones.

======================================

Subject: cartoon

Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, I had only a vague memory of this cartoon from 1975 until I saw a lone copy on a discount video display. I immediately purchased it for the viewing enjoyment of my two boys.

Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, is a mongoose saved by a colonial British family in India. The family's house and garden is also home to two cobras and their clutch of eggs. The Cobras know the mongoose as their enemy and fear him. The cobras solution to their problem is to kill the family in hope that the mongoose will leave instead of facing the mongoose directly. (Conniving , like the Jew) The mongoose also has a solution, kill the cobras along with their young. (Hmmmm?)

Gruesome you say? No wonder I've never seen it aired since. The actions of the hero are considered far too extreme for the sheeple to connect with today. But the ending did remind me of the J. R. Colson article of late.

======================================

Subject: FBI

FBI racial crime stats...

http://pw1.netcom.com/~jna/facts/racestat.htm

======================================

Subject: kikes

s wife in anti-Semitism row
27 May 2002

AMSTERDAM Ñ A criminal complaint alleging anti-Semitism was lodged against the wife of European Central Bank (ECB) president Wim Duisenberg, it was revealed on Monday.

Jewish organisation Federatief Joods Nederland (FJN) lodged the complaint with spokesperson Loonstein alleging that Duisenberg's wife was guilty of anti-Semitism and inciting hatred.

Out of solidarity with the Palestinians, Duisenberg's wife has for an extended period of time hung a Palestinian flag from off her balcony.

Loonstein said Duisenberg's wife had also said the present misery of the Palestinian was the fault of rich Jews.

"That is a classic example of anti-Semitism," Loonstein, who is also a lawyer, said.

The complaint claimed that Duisenberg, as "one of the most powerful men in Europe and the world" should distance himself from the comments of his wife.

The NJV requested its sister organisation in New York to examine the possibility of having the ECB chief declared in the US an "undesired" person.

Ed. Note: Actually it's a classic example that anti-Semitism means disagreeing with the Jewish position on anything. And not the phrasing: 'wife in anti-Semitism row' -- actually, dude, the wife just hung a flag. The kike started crying.

======================================

Subject: billings post NOT allowed

http://www.billingsnews.com/story?storyid=2151&issue=75

Subject: Non-Whites and traitors not welcomed in America!

I see we have the name callers on this board. Typical, typical, typical from the lovers of 'lowering of standards' slops.

It's too bad you have the whites or the racists in you face. Good! We are going to be in your face a lot in the future and we will be telling you to get the hell out of America. You people don't belong here. Pure and simple. This country was founded by white people, mostly of Scottish desent - not Jews, not Mexicans, not Haitians, not Africans, not Asians. In fact all were white who formed and established the U.S. in the 1700's. This country belongs to the Whites! Don't like my statement. Good! LEAVE MY COUNTRY and take your stupidity with you. Our schools, government, businesses - our society used to be orderly, clean, white, and the education exceeded the standards from that of today. Today's standards in all forms are a joke and shameful at the same time.

Regardless what some of you people think about who, what, how to handle the INS, there's only one way to handle the INS. As a taxpayer, I have the right to tell the INS and the people who work for ME to get the hell out! The INS deserves to be sued, broken down, and rebuilt on solid ground. Everyone who works for the INS deserve to be fired! INS needs to be replaced by sensible white people who are very aware of the immense, unfortunate darkening of our country and the 3rd world mentality being established. Presidente Bush will not help. He is a 3rd worlder lover and a traitor to the U.S. like many other idiots who work for the government.

So you individuals out there who think you are so damned important like a friggen lawyer says he is, YOU ARE NOTHING but people who love to call people who are RIGHT - racists and bigots. You have nothing intelligent or meaningful to say other than how frigging insecure and stupid you really are.

======================================

Subject: "Holocaust"

German author hit by Holocaust allegation

John Hooper in Berlin
Guardian

Thursday May 30, 2002

A leading German newspaper yesterday announced that it had abandoned plans to serialise a new novel by one of the country's most celebrated authors, saying it had concluded that the work was an anti-semitic "document of hate"

The explosive claim - vehemently denied by the author - stoked an already impassioned debate over whether, following advances by the far right elsewhere in Europe, anti-Jewish feeling was again on the rise in Germany.

There have been claims that one of Germany's biggest political movements, the pro-business Free Democrat Party, is being taken over by anti-semitic far-right populists.

The latest row centres on Tod eines Kritikers (Death of a Critic), by Martin Walser, to be published in the summer. A contemporary of Heinrich Bšll and GŸnter Grass, Mr Walser is regarded as one of the leading intellectual figures to have emerged in post-war Germany.

But in an open letter to his readers, the publisher of the conservative daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung said the book included "the full repertoire of anti-semitic cliches". Frank Schirrmacher said the book "toys with the fiction of finishing off what the Nazis did not accomplish".

But in a radio interview, Mr Walser said: "I would never, never, never have thought that this book would now be set in the context of the Holocaust. Believe me, I would never have written it in that case."

However, the author has stirred controversy in the past. He once described Auschwitz as a "moral cudgel", and earlier this month the German chancellor Gerhard Schršder challenged him to a public debate over his ideas on the rise of the Third Reich.

Mr Schirrmacher, one of the few people to have read the not-yet-published Tod eines Kritikers, said it dealt with the apparent murder of a Jewish critic. He said the victim was transparently modelled on the distinguished literary reviewer Marcel Reich-Ranicki.

At the end of the book, it emerges that the critic is not dead at all, and his wife notes that "getting himself killed would be out of character".

"This is the sentence that finally rendered me speechless", said Mr Schirrmacher. "Marcel Reich-Ranicki was the only member of his family to survive the Holocaust.

"I cannot help but find this sentence, which turns the propensity for either surviving or 'getting oneself killed' into personality traits, nothing short of horrifying".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4424141,00.html

======================================

Subject: Itz coming!

Hey Alex.

A reason to jump up and down. They could hear my scream 2 counties away.

Just got this in my inbox from MEMRI and couldn't wait to pass it on. The word is spreading like a kike whore. Their castle of lies is crumbling--slowly, but more are joining the enlightened.

Peter

http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=IA9502

May 29, 2002

No.95

Palestinian Leader: Number of Jewish Victims in the Holocaust Might be "Even Less Than a Million..." Zionist Movement Collaborated with Nazis to "Expand the Mass Extermination" of the Jews

A 1982 doctoral dissertation by Secretary-General of the PLO Executive Committee Mahmoud Abbas, a.k.a. Abu Mazen, who is considered second to Yasser Arafat, discussed "the secret ties between the Nazis and the Zionist movement leadership." Two years later, a study by Abu Mazen based on his dissertation for Moscow's Oriental College was published in Arabic by Dar Ibn Rushd publishers in Amman, Jordan.

In the introduction to his 1984 study, Abu Mazen referred to well-known Holocaust deniers, raised doubts that gas chambers were used for extermination of Jews, and claimed that the number of Jews murdered in the Holocaust might be "even less than a million." Abu Mazen claimed that the Zionist movement had a stake in convincing world public opinion that the number of victims was high; thus, it would achieve "greater gains" after the war when the time came to "distribute the spoils."

Abu Mazen's intention was to undermine the legitimacy of the Zionist movement by proving that during a critical stage in the history of the Jewish people ö the rise of Nazism and World War II ö the Zionist leadership stopped at nothing to achieve its aim of establishing a Jewish state. He wrote, "The truth [about the Nazi crimes] has another aspect" that the West preferred to disregard; instead, the West concealed "a basic partner in crime" ö that is, the Zionist movement. The study pointed to a convergence of the interests of the Nazi and the Zionist movements, and the fundamental similarity in the two movements' theories. The central claim Abu Mazen sought to prove is that the Zionist movement, with all its factions, conspired against the Jewish people and collaborated with the Nazis to annihilate it, because the movement considered "Palestine" the only appropriate destination for Jewish emigration.

Abu Mazen wrote, "It might be imagined that Zionism would do all it could, materially and otherwise, to save the Jews, or at least to keep them [alive] until the end of the war. It might have been expected that it would arouse world public opinion and direct its attention to the massacres carried out against the Jews, so that the governments would act to rescue them from their bitter fate." But, stated Abu Mazen, "what Zionism did was the exact opposite of what could have been expected": The Zionist movement sabotaged various aid plans(1) and withheld information regarding the bitter fate of Europe's Jews "in order to free itself from the need to take necessary action." Abu Mazen added, "the Zionist movement led a broad campaign of incitement against the Jews living under Nazi rule, in order to arouse the government's hatred of them, to fuel vengeance against them, and to expand the mass extermination."(2)

Introduction: The Truth has Another Aspect

"The Western countries sketched the final picture of the outcome of World War II. They defined the crimes committed, and described the criminals and the ones they victimized ö after setting themselves up as a faithful judge with the decisive word in matters of these crimes. They locked up details, facts, and crimes that they didn't want to exist; they ignored names, important people, institutions, organizations, and countries that they chose to ignore. In the end, they charged the Nazi leaders with all the crimes that were committed during the war, and they relentlessly hunted down those still alive, even though the crimes were committed long ago. The Nuremberg [trials] cut down the tyrants and the murderers, and cast a [shadow] on the basic partner in the crimes committed during the war. After they collected [the price] from them ö they narrowed the focus on the crimes, criminals, prosecutors, defendants, and witnesses, and set the entire matter in limited frameworks that could not be breached. This was how these countries dealt with half the truth, deliberately neglecting the other half."

The Number of Jewish Victims

"During World War II, 40 million people of different nations of the world were killed. The German people sacrificed 10 million; the Soviet people 20 million; and the rest [of those killed] were from Yugoslavia, Poland, and the other peoples. But after the war it was announced that 6 million Jews were among the victims, and that the war of annihilation had been aimed first of all against the Jews, and only then against the rest of the peoples of Europe."

"The truth of the matter is that no one can verify this number, or completely deny it. In other words, the number of Jewish victims might be 6 million and might be much smaller ö even less than 1 million. [Nevertheless], raising a discussion regarding the number of Jews [murdered] does not in any way diminish the severity of the crime committed against them, as murder ö even of one man ö is a crime that the civilized world cannot accept and humanity cannot accept."

"It seems that the Zionist movement's stake in inflating the number of murdered in the war was aimed at [ensuring] great gains. This led it to confirm the number [6 million], to establish it in world opinion, and by doing so to arouse more pangs of conscience and sympathy for Zionism in general. Many scholars have debated the question of the 6 million figure, and reached perplexing conclusions, according to which the Jewish victims total hundreds of thousands. The well-known Canadian author Roger Delarom(3) said on this matter: 'To date, no proof whatsoever exists that the number of Jewish victims in the Nazi concentration camps reached four million or six million. Zionism first spoke of 12 million exterminated in these camps, but then the number decreased greatly, to half, that is, only six million. Then the number decreased further, and became four million, as the Germans could not have killed or exterminated more Jews than there were in the world at that time. In effect, the true number is much smaller than these fictitious millions.' The [American] historian and author Raul Hilberg thinks that this number is no greater than 896,000."(4)

"The source of the submission of this large number, 6 million [murdered], is Chaim Weizmann's 1936 declaration before a British committee regarding the fate of 6 million Jews living in Europe if a world war should break out. [According to Weizmann], 'The little green branches are the ones that will survive, while the rest must bear their [bitter] fate.' From that point on, the Zionist movement insisted that all 6 million were murdered, and that none of them survived."

"Afterwards, the Zionist movement attempted to describe how they [the Jews] were murdered in concentration camps and gas chambers, as it disregarded two fundamental facts. First, many of the Jews remained alive; some were rescued by the Zionist movement [which encouraged] their emigration to Palestine, and some [survived because of] the peoples of the world that managed to protect them and take them away from the Nazis, as the Soviet Union did by sending two million Jews to its eastern republics. In addition, hundreds of thousands of live Jews were found in the concentration camps when the Allies liberated the territories [conquered by the Nazis]."

"Second, the extermination of the victims was not carried out only in the concentration camps and gas chambers. Some of the victims fell as a result of their participation in wars and battles, and also due to starvation and disease that struck all the peoples of Europe. In addition, the concentration camps were not only for Jews, but held people from all over Europe, among them fighters, intellectuals, scholars, prisoners of war, and opponents of fascism..."

"Regarding the gas chambers, which were supposedly designed for murdering living Jews: A scientific study published by Professor Robert Faurisson(5) of France denies that the gas chambers were for murdering people, and claims that they were only for incinerating bodies, out of concern for the spread of disease and infection in the region."(6)

The Zionist Movement Conspired Against the Jewish People "It takes little effort to prove the truth [about the crimes of the Nazis] and to document them. World War II did take place, and in it fell millions of victims. It was Hitler... who established the concentration camps in all of Europe to hold all of his opponents and enemies, including peoples not worthy of living, and it was also he who invented the gas chambers. However, another aspect of the truth remains shrouded in mystery, like the other side of the moon..."

"How could [anyone with] reason believe that the institutions of the Zionist movement that arose to defend 'the [Jewish] people' then became a cause of this people's annihilation? History has taught us that Nero burned Rome, but he was insane, and his insanity removes from him his responsibility. History has also taught us that leaders have betrayed their people and their country and sold them to their enemies. But they are few, and they alone bear the responsibility for their actions. Therefore, a popular, public movement's conspiracy against its 'people' is something astonishing that demands an in-depth and meticulous examination before it is accused for no reason..."

On the Similarity Between Nazi and Zionist Theory "When discussing declared Zionist ideas, which have been espoused with profound conviction and faith by the movement's followers, one finds that they believe in the purity of the Jewish race ö as Hitler believed in the purity of the Aryan race ö and the movement calls for finding a deeply-rooted and decisive solution to the 'Jewish problem' in Europe via immigration to Palestine. Hitler also called for this, and carried it out. The Zionist movement maintains that antisemitism is an eternal problem that throbs in the Gentiles' blood; that it is not possible to put an end to it or get away from it; and thus it is the basic motive for Zionist immigration. It follows that if antisemitism did not exist it would be necessary to invent it, and that if its flame dies away it must be fanned. David Ben-Gurion defined the Zionist movement as immigration [to Israel] and nothing else; whoever does not immigrate [to Israel] denies the Torah and the Talmud and therefore is not a Jew... These ideas provide a general dispensation to every racist in the world, most prominently Hitler and the Nazis, to treat the Jews as they wish, as long as this includes immigration to Palestine..."

The Entire Zionist Movement is Responsible for Conspiring with the Nazis "In order to avoid error and generalization regarding the various factions of the Zionists, and for the purpose of accuracy, we must point out that the Zionist movement was divided. One part held the leadership and another part formed the opposition· Can we accuse the second group, which was not party to the institutions and leadership [of conspiring against the Jewish people]? This question is relevant in only one incident ö whether there were differences of opinion between the two sides regarding the origin of the Zionist theory and regarding the practical implementation of Zionist thought. But if the point of departure and the implementation went together, as indeed happened ö then there is no room for question· An Arabic proverb states, 'When differences of opinion arise among thieves, the theft is revealed.' This is what happened with the Zionist movement; when the Labor Party ruled Israel, it refused the Revisionists [the future Likud party] their share, and so [the Revisionists] began to expose the facts and rend the curtain of falsehood. However, in the heat of argument over the roles of the Laborites [in conspiring with the Nazis], they forgot to speak of the role they played, which was no different from that of others. Then came a third side and revealed the positions of all..."

Endnotes:

(1) In the study, Abu Mazen notes several incidents in which the Zionist movement ignored the fate of the Jews and actively undermined plans to aid them.

He wrote, ãIn 1943, there was an opportunity to send packages of food, medicine, and clothing to Jews in the ghettos of Europe. The International Red Cross, in cooperation with the U.S. government, began collecting these packages, but the Zionist movement objected to the proposal and sabotaged the idea, claiming that the German Red Cross would be the recipient [of the packages]. Because of these positions, thousands died in the ghetto of epidemic and starvation, even before the Nazis began their actions. Infant mortality ranged from 60% to 70% in various places ö nothing could be more terrible. Had intentions been good, there were ways and means of delivering the packages, via the Red Cross or some neutral country such as Switzerland, Turkey, or Portugal, and they would have been sent ö and all these children could have been saved."

(2) Abu Mazen stated in his paper, "The Zionist movement's most obvious incitement activities against the Jews living under the German conquest were the decisions of the Biltmore Conference, held in the U.S. [in May, 1942]· when the Zionist leaders declared war on Germany on behalf of the Jewish people. When Hitler learned about the conclusions of the conference through his ambassador in the U.S., he was enraged, and declared, 'Now I will liquidate them.'

Afterwards he held an urgent meeting with all Germany's leaders, and they developed their detailed plans for the Final Solution· We must not overestimate the importance of the Biltmore Conference and see it as the only reason leading Hitler to authorize the Final Solution, but it is clear that the decisions taken at the conference were one of Hitler's main excuses for speeding up the implementation of his solution regarding the Jews, and therefore this conference can be seen as one of the more important causes that led to the [bitter] end·"

(3) The spelling of this name is not certain; the name as it appears in the study is unknown.

(4) Abu Mazen cited p. 670 of Hilberg's The Destruction of the European Jews as the source of this data. However, an examination of this source shows that no such figure is mentioned. Hilberg writes that between 1935 and 1945 world Jewry lost a third of its number; it dropped from 16 million to about 11 million.

It should be noted that the original Russian version of Abu Mazen's study focuses much less on how many Jews were murdered than does the Arabic version, and includes only the figure of 896,000, which Abu Mazen attributes to Hilberg.

(5) A well-known Holocaust denier.

(6) In the original version of this study (in Russian) the question of whether or not gas chambers were used to murder Jews does not appear.

Ed. Note: Never again, say the kikes. Not even once, we middle-finger in response. But since you charged us -- what the hell? Fans will note Suckpoop Joe's site has run two articles in about as many days in which the other shoe never drops. Normally the Christian cowards who pen 'poop's columns cite racialist stuff only to discredit it. But, in the last couple days we've seen a long article by a guy named Strom about Rami's "Radio Islam" website. Granted, it was done in the breathless sort of not-real-until-we-discover-it treatment we expect from these weaklings, but still -- Strom never really made a moral judgment, just described what he found. And then today, Jew-lovin' John Daugherty pretty much repeats this MEMRI story word for word. Very, very interesting. What does it mean? I have no idea. Has the Suckpoop disassumed the position? Has he wiped the shit off his lips and begun to yodel? I have no idea. But I'm watching! The fact is, the Holocaust never happened. Itz a designer term for a bunch of imaginary dead people the lying kikes use to lever hundreds of billions of dollars from the pockets of decent White men in America and Europe. We owe the jews nothing but extermination, and that day is coming.

======================================

Subject: black anecdote

I'm normally tolerant of fussy drivers, being that I drive for a living. If every little thing bothered me, I would choose a different line of work. However, today I witnessed an interesting display of vehicular angst that had the effect of changing my perspective of government "protection" of black people. It's not that I am concerned with their welfare (no pun intended), it's just that certain black people feel they're somehow superior to us--that we're now supposed to bow to them from the back of the bus.

The incident occurred near our home as my wife and I drove to the market to drop off some mail, and cash a check at the adjacent bank. The road to the market is a busy four-lane avenue with a center turn lane. I pulled into that lane, slowed, and awaited the considerable flow of opposing traffic. Meanwhile, I noticed something in my rear-view mirror: A black woman was waving her arms wildly. I wondered what she was doing, as she was alone in the car, and no one else was ahead or to the side of us. I finally surmised she was yelling at US!!

Apparently, she was dissatisfied to await her turn to pull into the parking lot, and I guess she was screaming at me to risk our lives by pulling into the opposing traffic, now moving pretty fast. I wondered out loud "Does she REALLY believe I should endanger our lives to reduce her waiting time?" I looked back, and she TILL was flapping her bulbous lips at me in an angry manner, flailing her arms to signal that I should be moving out of her way.

First, I would suggest that this woman get therapy, for her anger was drastically out of proportion to the situation. Second, I think some black people take it upon themselves to extract "payback", courtesy of our government's protection programs, for what they perceive as our enslaving their distant relatives. These blacks always try to be victims, positioning themselves upon a pedestal of living martyrdom, as they seek to avenge their ancestors by annoying non-blacks, provoking enmity and racial tension.

Perhaps she wasn't trying to stir up trouble, but if I were her, I'd be much less inclined to treat people waiting for heavy traffic as just so much fodder for their racist hatred.

Ed. Note: Thanks for sharing. But seriously, we don't judge people here on the Ricki Lake show. Hahaha....oh, yes we do. You know what show I'd really like to see? The medical docudrama where they remove that beachball she swallowed as a young hungry. ... But yes, you are quite right. Niggers aren't really human. I think of them as sort of ape+ level. They could probably test out a little higher than their lowland buddies on no.2 pencil tests, although I dare say the zoolies could top the boolies in public comportment. My point, and I do have one as that kid-licking comedienne likes to say -- is that why they want women in the priesthood? -- is that niggers may not really understand all the ins and outs of affirmative action and what it implies, but they "get" the deeper meaning: niggaz be up, whitey be down. And this does show in their behavior, in a thousand glaringly obvious ways. Such as you experienced today. As the brilliant Jack Halliday said in Blackout, colorblindness and race-neutrality are as impossible as a flipped quarter landing on its edge. One side's up or the other. I think we humans deserver the top spot. Niggers should shrink from us, and for too long it's been the other way.

======================================

Subject:

Alex,

First and foremost, thank you.

I know there is little room for one who habitually equivicotes but your latest rantings have finally cleared the way. It is indeed strange to actually be consciously aware of your oppressors but none the less be so programmed into their power trip. So ingrained is their brainwashing!

Growing up I accepted the all the too typical Judeo-Christian garbage my beautiful mother influenced me with. But ultimately after meeting and actually sharing personal relationships with the jews I came to my senses.

Liberate yourself WHITE MAN!

Malcolm Scott

Omaha, Ne

Ed. Note: Yes, I sat through many a Sunday School class myself. I remember as a tot how illogical and really kind of funny are some of the things these old women believe. I was raised a Christian Scientist, and although I never shared Mary Baker Glover Eddy's fantasy, it had the opposite of the intended effect. Instead of enhancing my capacity for delusion -- Christian Scientists believe disease is caused by "mortal mind" rather than, say, germs -- it drove me completely in the opposite direction: I HATE anything that comes between me and reality. That is why I'm a racist. The fucking kikes that control our media are nothing but CS weaklings who blame other people for bringing their diseases on themselves by their Bad Thoughts. Same exact mental process at work: If Joe didn't think "racist" thoughts, niggers wouldn't be stupid and violent. If Joe "stood portal at the door of thought" (p. 391, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures...if I recall) he wouldn't have the measles. If there's one moral priniciple I adhere to, and I'm not saying there is, that's it: People who falsify reality for whatever reason they choose to call it are evil pieces of shit. Well, I actually don't believe that; based on what I've seen, and what Joseph Wambaugh has a character point out in The Choirboys, very few humans are actually evil: they aren't strong enough. They're weak and hypocritical: "scrotes" as his cop calls them. That's about it. The average CS can bear any pain -- as long as it's happening to you! Even if you are his daughter and your constricted bowel is making you literally cough up shit. He'll keep right on practitioning until you're in the boneyard. But the moment pain happens to him, why, apirin! glasses! dentist! -- it's a completely different story. Ah, humanity -- all I can do is cackle. Try to help people once in a while, if you like them. That's all you can do in this life.

======================================

Subject: awards

Alex

There's a rather low key, discreet solicitation going around the web requesting interested readers to participate in a vote for the "best" internet sites in various categories. It's being judged by a rather chi-chi assortment of VIPs, too, as explained by the brief promo copied below:

# # # #

Dear [Other, Fashionable Site -- OFS] reader,

We've been pleased to learn that [OFS] has been nominated for a Webby Award by the International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences

The Internet is clogged with meaningless prizes and citations, but the Webby awards, the Internet equivalent of the Oscars, are not in that category. The annual Webby awards have been around for five years, and are judged by a committee that includes, in their own words, "Francis Ford Coppola, musicians David Bowie and Beck, Chairman of Miramax Talk Media Tina Brown, cyberguru Esther Dyson, CEO of Real Networks Rob Glaser, Chef Julia Child, and Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison. Members also include writers and editors from publications such as The New York Times, Wired, Forbes, Details, Fast Company, Elle, The Los Angeles Times, Vibe, and WallPaper."

[!!! Oooohhh, now there's a distinguished cast of celebrity deep thinkers. Just the proper crowd to objectively select the "best" news site on the web, THAT'S sure a relief. They have MY full confidence anyway.]

The Academy is serious in wanting to recognize technical excellence and creative achievement on the Web. If you think [OFS] deserves an award, we ask that you give us your vote in the Webby People's Voice competition.

To vote you need to go to

http://www.webbyawards.com/peoplesvoice/index.html

to register, and then cast your vote. It only takes a few seconds.

[OFS] is running in the News category, against some other worthy sites, among them: The BBC, Debkafile, the Poynter Institute, and AllAfrica.com.

# # # #

Now maybe it's just me, but the selection of candidates provided does seem somewhat limited. I suspect that my personal favorite news site is not going to be listed as a choice on the ballot.

And since I consider this a great opportunity to let some of the glamorous and self-congratulatory glitterati know what news site I consider to be the best on the web, GUESS I'M JUST GONNA HAVE TO 'WRITE IN' MY CHOICE IN THE 'COMMENTS' SECTION PROVIDED AT THE VOTING PAGE.

I don't think Tina Brown, or Rob Glaser, or Larry Ellison is familiar yet with my favorite news page, and I would like to encourage each and all to visit it if they are not. Maybe keep it in mind as an entry on next year's ballot.

Perhaps some of your readers have a favorite that is not being offered as a choice, and they would like to write in their candidate as well.

Regards
Mark K

Ed. Note: Chummy, clubby, and in this case kikey. If you win an award, that makes you Important. Important people must be mindful at all times of their Dignity. Dignified people don't use terms like clam-jammers. That's...FAR too high a price to pay. But seriously, could they have gotten any more jews on the panel? The key is focus on getting better, bit by bit, not the standard American "aren't we working hard here? Oh, my, we are so hard working."

======================================

Subject:



======================================

Subject: Friar's Club Roast of Rob Reiner

Anyone see this?

One of the best jokes was told by blond, gentile ex-alcoholic and prescription pill addict, comedienne Brett Butler:

Standing at the microphone she looks out at the audience and all the people up on stage with her and says:

"Being here tonight makes me long for the good ol' days (pause) when STRAIGHT jews ran the business."

LOL!

======================================

Subject: CT

To who it concerns

This is Kevin O'Neil from CT. I'm a member of EURO and the NAAWP Today I got a hard lesson in the double standard cops and schools play when it comes to race.

here's the phone number and address of that Zionnazi Cops 1-203-797-4611

Danbury Police
120 Main Street,
Danbury,CT 06810
and the phone number /address of the asshole Jew loving school "prinicipal"
1-203-797-4800
Danbury High school
C/o Prinicipal
Clapboard Ridge Road
Danbury,CT 06810
The case number is
02-6240
I hope everyone gets involve against these morons They call me a white supremacist because my leafets denouce Israel's racism. What is wrong with this picture? They even treated me like a harden criminal even through I had no record there, not even a speeding ticket.

======================================

Subject: German WWII video clips

Hello.

Over the past year i have collected a number of german WWII-era video clips. I have a lot of Luftwaffe clips, many army, panzer clips and some clips pertaining to Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP.

Clips are in either .AVI (Microsoft's whatever format) or MPEG-1.

I also made a kind of a Luftwaffe-tribute video which combines several Luftwaffe clips with a Luftwaffe march. I encoded it in MPEG-1 VCD since I planned to burn it to a cd and watch it on a DVD-player. its 33 Megs. i also encoded it as Mpeg4 DivX... 3.6 Megs.

Basically I put up a web-server on my home computer - to host the videos. First it will be kind of like an FTP directory, but later(in a couple of days) I'll prolly add a real HTML/PHP site.

I put it up because I know there isn't any other site I foudn yet which hosts these files.

Here is the address: http://208.45.24.22

======================================

Subject: Pearl video

Alex,

I just watched the Danny Pearl video and for the life of me I cannot understand what the FBI was making such a big stink about. I recall watching a video so long ago it was on Beta, called 'Faces of Death'. That video put the Pearl video to shame and yet no one and I mean no one ever tried to block the distribution of that particularly grisly tape.

One year ago I would have beat the crap out of someone who made an insulting comment about the J*ws, now I watch the beheading of that J*w with a grin. My eyes are open now. Imagine what happens when we get a few million more pair slowly coming into focus...

Israel in trouble itz.

======================================

Subject: chortlingen

Re: Schadenfreude chortler,

PC deconstruction, paradigms, WHOA! Hold on there sonny boy and put your thoughts where we can reach 'em with a dictionary.

Big words = little dick.

The fact of the matter is that the people who find themselves on these pages do so at extreme personal risk, understanding that it is certainly worth the risk, and coincidentally happen to be among the most well read and intelligent people I have ever encountered.

Seeing the Truth behind the lies is not a gift, it is a curse. Having said that, it is encumbent upon us to proclaim it to the world. Nothing, and I mean nothing is as gratifying as speaking with someone who has had their eyes opened for the first time and listening to their wonder and awe that the world is really, truly, no kidding, Oz, with a gnarled little J*w pulling the levers behind the curtain.

They cannot help it, it is their nature.

We have a nature too, and if you believe the J*w, we are a violent and dangerous race.

Hey, there is a silver lining after all!

Remember this: There is nothing as dangerous as a White Man with his back against the wall. (hint: machine gun, carbine, revolver, bomber, anti-tank weapon, Sarin, Tabun, Nuclear bomb, grenade, armour, jet aircraft, aircraft carrier, cluster bomb, Claymore, white phosphorous.... I gotta quit, my wrists are getting sore.

Chortle, chortle.

======================================

Subject: I Love White Folks

Hi Alex,

The site www.ilovewhitefolks.com changed to http://www.macstand.com/

14/88!!

======================================

Subject: AWF article

I don't know what to say to Angry White Woman about her article. Although I have tremendous respect for her as a writer and pro-White activist (I consider her writing, at its best, important activism) I got the feeling she was blaming men for being men. Men need to get in touch with their feelings, she opines, men shouldn't use the word "feminine" in a demeaning way. I guess she was referring to instances like Dr. Pierce's oft repeated phrase "feminized men." All in all, I'm left with the impression that Angry White Woman thinks women are scarce in the pro-White venue because the men involved are boors. I don't think Alan Alda could have been plainer in the message.

I think the real problem is that many women don't know where they fit in, in a healthy society, anymore. Angry White Woman thinks some movement leaders should be women. Well, yeah. Of course. I thought Angry White Woman was a leader of the sort Alex Linder is. Since we don't really vote for Big Bad Pro-White Leader of the Year, I don't know how we can elect a woman to the post. People in this movement become leaders because others think enough of them to follow them. It's the natural way.

Would be enough for the men in the pro-White organizations to state outright that they need more woman in their organizations?

Deosevenoate

======================================

Subject: AWF, Wilhelm

I love to see women like AWF or Raina Wilhelm write in, all things agreed or not. Keep the good stuff coming ladies!

My comments on AWF's recent essay:

1. For centuries, young unattatched men have been willing to fight for two things: women and plunder. If we want soldiers, we better find more of both to be made available to participants.

2. Married men need support of their wives. Wives are naturally protective of the family and thus perhaps a bit more reluctant to slug it out with the mud hordes and their Jew masters. Wives need to feel like they have support from other women inside the movement. Our movement is about protecting our young, not about endangering them. That's what the kikes want moms to believe, and we had better get agressive on this point. 14 words!

3. Children learn quite a bit at an early age, at the feet of their mothers. While racial affinity is to a large extent inborn, Moms need to be willing to tell their kids racial realities or we are finished. If on the other hand we had thousands of mothers teaching their children to love the White Race and defend it, we would be back on the track to survival.

4. Women complement us naturally. Their presence is integral to any "community" we are trying to awaken.

5. If anyone wants an inspirational read on the role women can play in conflict, read the Illiad by Homer. The tales of Hera, Aprodite, and Athena are both amusing and thought provoking as explorations of feminine archetypes. We need all these hands on deck, including Demeter/Ceres, Diana/Artemis "the huntress", and Nesta, the Roman goddess of the hearth. Obviously, the medieval type of Mary is inspirational as well.

6. Not every woman is disposed to being a stay at home mom. Particularly since the Jew and their shabbas goy traitors have destroyed all our local communities whether small towns or ethnic neighborhoods in bigger cities, with their combo instruments of: 1) non-White migration and 2) the governmental subsidy of construction of geographically dispersed suburbs. Talk about alienation, try spending all day at home, day after day, with only an occassional mall visit or play group to intervene! Middle class White women, soccer moms included, have been targeted victims of the Jew-cum-White traitor cabal, and I think only the televitz keeps them from realizing it. If we can reconstitute or natural hite local communities, you would see White birthrates shoot up again. To get there, we need full participation and full time movement activism by any capable women is encouraged. But as a previous commentator stated, gals should "just do it!"

Together we will win!

Tim K

======================================

Subject: kill Televitz

A VNN reader writes of his "visceral revulsion at seeing crotches rubbed by adolescent males on a daily basis." An image seen in passing as I went around channels on the Televitz (before killing it) -- an adolescent White male with pale, spindly legs sticking out of his huge, baggy nigger shorts, standing on a pedestal, humping the air, making rapid, exaggerated pelvic thrusts to the Negroid beat of "rap" music. This, the role model for your children.

It's legal to kill a Televitz. Turn this filth off, White man. TURN IT OFF.

-- a VNN reader

======================================

Subject: Yellow Times

Hello Alex, If your readers don't know about Yellow Times, they should YT puts forth those articles our currently gagged media puppet will not. I am forwarding this one, because the first few lines about kikes violating intern. law makes me sick.

I trust your judgment to mention or post selected bits and pieces if you wish.

I wish we could do more than just dejewify our lives.

Oh, I keep forgetting; izzie filth considers itself above all nations. God's chosen people?

More like "God chose them after they remade Him." "jews, the ultimate revisionists!"

Peter

YellowTimes.org News Update

***********************************

May 31, 2002:

The Israeli government has issued tenders for the construction of 957 family housing units in the Israeli settlements in the West Bank.

This is in violation of international law.

To read more about it, read the YellowTimes.org News from the Front article titled "New tender for 957 housing units in Israeli settlements in Palestine," at the following direct link:

http://www.yellowtimes.org/sections.php?op=viewarticle&artid=33

***********************************

Three articles included below, and one link:

"Europe's impotence"
by Chiedozie Chigbo (YellowTimes.org Columnist - United Kingdom)

http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=299

"Mrs. Bush, we are ALL Palestinian mothers"
by Nahed Alsous (Guest - United States)

by John Brand (YellowTimes.org Columnist - United States)

http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=300

The following article is not included below:

"The Good Americans"
By James T. Phillips (Guest - United States)

http://www.yellowtimes.org/article.php?sid=302

Go to :
Reader Mail Index

Back to VNN Main Page