|
04/05/01
Subject: Mo or less Dees
Just read the article on mo' Dees new "tolerance" internet ads posted on
the Freeper's BBS. All I can say is OUTSTANDING! Is there any other way
we can convince Mo' to squander his ill gotten gains on such idiocy? As
if the all the other sources providing a constant bombardment on the
benefits and wonders of Multikulti race mixing and unrestricted
immigration and tolerance are not enough! HAH! Far better for SPLC's ill
gotten gains to be applied in such a useless manner then perhaps buying
more Israeli lobby PAC votes. My only other question is what other
useless methods can we convince the SLPC to invest in? Perhaps telling
all the hand-gun owners to turn in their weapons might be another good
cause. Or maybe telling all the fundamentalist Christians that Jesus was
a fraud might be a good "investment." Or better yet why not convince
Mo' Dees to buy ads extolling the virtue of Jewish influence on America
and the Jews wonderful and mystical Tikkum Olam beliefs. How satisfying
it would be to begin showing the world just how influential these
wonderful people actually are in all our lives. In yo' face Jews - Isn't
it about time?
Arch Stanton
Sincerely,
Saw It In Person
04/04/01
Subject: LTE- on spotting Jewish names
Many thanks to the Center To Preserve Traditional Western Culture
for the important article on spotting Jewish names.
One indicator that was left out was what I call the "snipped" name,
the one with the -berg, -stein, -sky amputated, as in Bright, Gold,
Light, Perl, Ring, Wein, Blume, or Blum, or Bloom...there are so many
variations. One develops a sixth sense -- Rabinowitz can become Robbins,
Robands, or Roberts. MTV's "Sumner Redstone" is actually Murray
Rothstein. As was mentioned, look at the first name as well. Barry,
Murray, Alan, David...
Here, an excellent piece on the subject --
http://www.freespeech.org/thelordswork/Ford/70.htm
Here is a web site --
http://www.jewhoo.com/
worth looking at -- you'll see how very many of the people in "popular
culture" are Jews, and become familiar with their names.
Want to check out a name? You can go to --
http://www.jewishgen.org/
and run a Soundex search; this detects similar-sounding names. It's
loads of fun -- like turning over a rock! Look at 'em run! Safren,
Zafron, Safrin, Schwerin, Schafrin, Shafran, Swiryn, Sporn, Spirn,
Cwern, Zwerin, Chifrin, Cwerin, Shifreen, Shpryn, Schefrin, Tzifrin,
Ziffren, Shaffran, Shworen, Szafran, Soffran, Safran, Zipryn, Zipprich,
Zipper...whee! Get the Raid!
-- The Old Jew-Spotter
04/04/01
Subject: Chuck Pearson's concluding reply to Brian Copp
Mr. Copp, your current mentation resembles nothing so much as a
tossed salad. You are having this discussion with yourself, not with us.
You are attacking your own straw men, as we stand to the side and watch,
bemused. You are battling with your own assumptions, not with what is
actually on this site. To wit --
"...when I look at the sites you tout - LewRockwell.com,
FrontPageMag.com, etc. ad nauseum - I see a bunch of slimy conservative
Jews..."
We do not "tout" these sites. If you ever bother to _read_ VNN,
you'll find endless savage criticism of FrontPage's David Horowitz
almost every day -- such as this piece --
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/index35.htm
Don't call us the Coffee Mug Right- _we coined that phrase_. We're
not the "rightists" you're criticizing. We're not the "conservatives"
you're criticizing. We're not the "Republicans" you're criticizing. We
are not even necessarily the "Christians" you're criticizing. We're
White Nationalists. Simple, steadfast, straightforward. We ourselves
endlessly criticize rightists, conservatives, Republicans, Christians
who work against White interests. Again, if you bothered to read VNN,
you'd know that.
What is your ideology, other than unfocused resentment and anger?
There are many confused people like you, picking and choosing bits from
a _smorgasbord_ of conflicting, contradictory "-isms," trying and
discarding one pair of glasses after another until a view is found that
corresponds with their momentary emotional state.
You say, "I went to an inner-city High-School and Junior-High that
were both over 90% Black and Mexican. When the Black bus driver throws
you off her bus as the Black passengers shout and call you a 'White
mother-fucker' just for stepping on 'their' bus, you can preach to me
about race." When I relate the very same experiences I've had, you
discount them as "shit," "Neanderthal swill," "preaching," "laughable,"
and call me a "mental defective." Is that really you talking?
One moment you say, "I think non-Whites should be deported or
sterilized." In the next breath, you say, "your use of the term [nigger]
makes me wonder if you really believe in racial justice for all
peoples."
We should cut their balls off, but we shouldn't call them names?
What do _you_ believe in? Do you even know?
You seem to be undergoing a major life transition. You are still
parroting the Jewish nonsense that's been drummed into you all your
days- "racial justice for all peoples," whatever that means. That's OK-
let it come out! Listen to yourself until you hear how silly it sounds,
until you realize that you are merely repeating alien thoughts, not
expressing your own. I will not hold your words against you, for they
are not really yours, but come from the little TV-Jew inside you.
I think that you have begun to make a recovery. The Aryan heritage
which you referred to is asserting itself; you have begun to realize
that things are seriously amiss, and that Jews have something to do with
that. The shouting non-Whites we both abhor are but a symptom; the Jew
is the disease. "Israel against the nations."
We all went through the same process to get where we are today; a
lifetime of Jewish indoctrination had to be vomited back up. It is slow
and painful. Keep coming back to VNN; read the articles like _Blackout_,
and also try the wonderful essays to be found in Yggdrasil's Library at
--
http://www.ddc.net/ygg
as well as the definitive explanation of America's current immigration
disaster at --
http://www.p-m-s.freeserve.co.uk/texts/USpol.htm
Thanks for writing; we're always delighted to hear from our audience.
You'll always have White friends here at VNN. God bless.
-- Chuck Pearson
04/03/01
Subject: B.C.'s Reply to Pearson comments
To- B.C.- You said of the World Socialist Web Site you touted-
"Look at the list of names on their editorial board -- I don't see many
[sic] Rosenberg's, Eisenstein's or Schpleckowitz's."
I also made it clear that they are a bunch of politically-correct Marxists when it comes to
racial issues. The overriding point of this particular statement is that the Jews have
abandoned the socialist movement altogether. But when I look at the sites you tout -
LewRockwell.com, FrontPageMag.com, etc. ad nauseum - I see a bunch of slimy conservative
Jews who seriously think that traffic lights and public schooling are a form of socialist
tyranny.
Do we look stupid? "WSWS" is Marxist. The philosophy is that of Jew
Leon Trotsky, born Lev Davidovitch Bronshtein. Leon looked good with
that pick sticking out of his head, we say.
Do I look stupid? "VNN" is a neo-Nazi, lunatic far-Right website. Like VNN, the WSWS
contains many kernels of truth. But also like VNN, they are pushing ideas that have long
since extended their expiration date. As I've said to you idiots in previous e-mails, the
truly independent-minded will seek out and recognize truth when they see it, and falsehood
when they see it. Your laughable ideology is so far over-the-top that only a small group
of mental defectives (or mental over-heaters) would accept it as truth.
And like the typical far-Rightist, you whine that Jews have been influential as fomenters
of Communist revolution. They've also been influential as fomenters of scientific and
technological revolution. In many ways, they have had a positive impact on our lives.
Communism is irrelevant anyway. You folks at VNN, the smug rightists, like to white-wash
the real social problems existing throughout the world. And most of our problems, whether
you acknowledge it or not, were created by non-Jewish Whites.
"Socialism, properly carried out, ultimately leads to low taxes,
healthy neighborhoods, and good schools." Gaha. "Properly carried out."
"Ultimately." Neat little qualifiers to avoid the fact that there is no
such society to point to as an example.
Typical garbage from the ignoramuses of the right. Socialism has never existed in America,
thanks to Republican half-wits such as yourself. In case you didn't realize it, there has
been a steady erosion and breakdown of social-services in this country during the past 20
years. The Republicans have been dismantling what little social safety net existed, and
are rapidly turning us into a country of market-worshipping Mestizos. My god, pal, Bill
Clinton cut welfare by 60%. And didn't you hear about GWB's "Bankruptcy Reform"? --
pro-corporate, anti-worker sleaze is all it is. Do you really think that the U.S. is a
"Left-wing" country? If you do, well, I don't know you personally, but you are either an
upper-class goon (like Alex) or yet another seriously misguided White guy.
But now that you've brought it up, America did pursue somewhat socialist policies in the
40's and 50's. I could mention the GI Bill, the massive Science/Space funding of
Eisenhower and Kennedy, the Marshall Plan (for Europe), etc. Go to Sweden, Germany, or
Japan - excellent schools and neighborhoods, all essentially socialist. As far as taxes,
they wouldn't be such a burden if a social safety net were still in place. In Scandinavian
countries you have something like a month of paid vacation courtesy of the government as
part of their extensive welfare state, yet they still enjoy a very high standard of living.
Conservatives are busy eroding workers' livelihoods, be it through "Bankruptcy reform,"
regressive Bush-style taxation, or the privatization of health-care. All-in-all, it is the
right-wingers who pose the biggest threat to modern civilization - the forces of the
extreme-left died off with the USSR. Market-worshipping right-wingers are on the march,
spearheaded by the United States. It's the NEW WORLD ORDER, if you haven't noticed.
Nothing would lead so directly to "low taxes, healthy neighborhoods,
and good schools" as the absence of blacks, Mexicans, and Jews.
They're only part of the problem. The real war against the White
working-class, and I use
that term ("working-class") loosely, is being waged by White corporate America. You blame
the homeless, the "welfare rabble" and poor minorities for all your problems, but the
managerial class has always waged a war against the working man, from the union-breakers to
the child-labor industrialists to the slave-owners of the Old South. If you think that
everything was OK before the Blacks and Mexicans took over, think again. You think that
eliminating these people will solve all our problems. You are only half-correct. The old
distinctions between White groups will still exist. Our race is just as fucked-up as ever,
and the ruling elite ever more so.
Don't get me wrong. I think non-Whites should be deported or sterilized. But I have no
qualms about kicking out White shit as well.
The nigger has probably been THE major social concern here for fifty years
now- and, after the expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars and
the re-organization of our entire society "to be nice to them," the ones
I see on the street today have reverted so far back that some are
pre-verbal.
Obviously an exaggeration. Poverty has always been a major concern - 2/3rds of the poor
are White. Again, this assertion of yours is a total joke. It shows how lame and hollow
your "revolutionary" crap really is. "Hundreds of billions of dollars"??? - this is a
combined figure over 30+ years, in a $9 trillion/ yr. economy! Massive social problems
have always existed amongst the White community. And you still don't GET IT: "nigger" is
commonly associated with repression, hatred, and mindless racial violence - your use of the
term makes me wonder if you really believe in racial justice for all peoples, or if you
are just a disgruntled Republican who's fallen off the right side of the table, cracking
his skull on the linoleum.
I once heard a guttural "HUUUUNH! HUUU-UUUNH!" sound behind
me; I turned to see a grinning 10-year-old nigger hanging halfway out a
bus window, making an obscene gesture. Taxes? Even struggling apartment
dwellers in my city pay over $120.00 per month in property tax alone-
hidden in the rent which many niggers don't pay- for the privilege of
being given this subsidized, vaccinated, vitamin-enriched-school-breakfast- fed black
finger.
Don't preach to me about Black behavior, you idiot. I went to an inner-city High-School
and Junior-High that were both over 90% Black and Mexican. When the Black bus driver
throws you off her bus as the Black passengers shout and call you a "White mother-fucker"
just for stepping on 'their' bus, you can preach to me about race. I've experienced it and
seen it happen on a large scale.
My my! Giving free food to poor kids! I always thought that was part of human decency.
Instead of directing your anger against school-kids, you should direct it against the
richest 1% of Americans. Our battle is one of racial survival AND social justice. Believe
it or not, equality, democracy, and human decency are still important. They aren't Marxist
pipe-dreams.
This is my "brother," my "equal." He goes through what used to be a
"healthy neighborhood" in tangled, disorderly, randomly-moving clumps
which emit obscenities, incomprehensible shouts, the sound of fists
(...)
[About 10 lines of this shit deleted]
YAAAAAAWWWWWNNNNN... Is this a Monty Python skit? A Dr. Seuss book? I've been around it
in real life, so I have little need to exaggerate it as you do.
[About 5 more lines of this Neanderthal swill deleted]
There's hardly anything on race on this web site, and for good
reason;
Every other story on their site deals with immigration and race, albeit from a pro-Marxist
standpoint. Nevertheless, they give intelligent analyses of current events, so I give them
my respect.
Marxists don't believe in it.
Don't think so. The trendy leftist/post-modernist crowd are not composed of Marxists.
They are liberals. Don't confuse liberalism with socialism, or socialism with Marxism.
Haven't you heard of Sokal's Hoax? Well, Sokal is a radical leftist.
Here, if you can stand to read
stilted bullshit, really awful writing, is the Trotskyite viewpoint from
some Helen Halyard, "the Assistant National Secretary of the Socialist
Equality Party in the United States"-
I wasn't defending the political platform of the Socialist Equality Party or any other
silly grouplet! I was merely recommending WSWS as a source of superior political and
social commentary. Nietzsche once said, to the effect, that the mistakes of great men are
of greater importance than the successes of lesser ones. They may have a flawed
perspective, but at least they have triple digit IQs.
"Race and nation-While the concepts of race and nation are taken to
express particular phenomena, an understanding of the historical
development of each is crucial in approaching political issues today.
These concepts are political and not biological. The way the concept
race has been used in capitalist society serves to obscure, rather than
clarify how society is organized. There is no such thing as a pure race
of people."
The usual Jewish lie, that race is only a social construct.
You conveniently forgot to list a source, and I get the feeling that you've snipped out the
portions that help prove your point, while leaving out more important parts (just like with
my letter). To be sure, this is a pretty cryptic passage, but it is irrelevant. Don't
take her opinions as representative of everyone on the left. That being said, you seem to
be misreading this passage somewhat. She said that race and nation are "taken to express
particular phenomena," but that they've been politicized by right-wing capitalists to
obscure bigger forces at work. Of course, many sleazy conservatives have played the "race
card" to get votes. She's dead on about that. Again, it is true that WSWS thinks race is
a "social construct," but that shouldn't detract from their excellent analysis of many
social issues.
"In the nationalism that arose prior to and during the nineteenth
century, the development of the nation-state marked an advance over
feudal society, with its hundreds of distinct municipalities. Great
nations were social and economic units and were not based on ethnicity
or a common language."
The same old disingenuous crap. "Not based on," even if true, would
not mean that ethnicity and a commmon language are not significant. Nice
try. I suppose a "social unit" is composed of all sorts of different
people, with nothing in common, who can't understand each other? On what
planet? Could this even slip past a smart high-school kid?
Once again, you seem to be misreading the passage. She didn't say that ethnicity and
language aren't important. She said that 19th century nationalism was totally different
from modern-day nationalism. Do you think that the British Empire, the Austro-Hungarian
Empire, the German Empire, or Czarist Russia were mono-ethnic, mono-lingual states? Don't
think so. They were empires held together by sheer force. These multiethnic empires
eventually broke up during the 20th century. The new nationalism that we promote -
race/ethnic based nationalism - is newer than you think. It's a distinctly 20th century
phenomenon that has accelerated since the end of the Cold War. At any rate, you're taking
the most over-the-top psudo-socialist junk from the Socialist Equality Party in an attempt
to smear all socialists. I still maintain that there is nothing more abhorrent about their
views than, say, the garbage found in the average right-wing conservative publication.
"With the development of modern capitalism, the ideology of
nationalism was no longer progressive."
"Progressive." Meaning? Zero. Just proof by assertion, a smear on
nationalism. Go on.
"progressive" in the sense that capitalism sought to reach across national/ethnic/cultural
lines to maximize economic efficiency. In case you didn't realize it, WSWS is
ANTI-CAPITALIST. I read a book called "One Hundred Years of Socialism" by Donald Sassoon,
who argues that socialism has always been wed to the nation-state while capitalism has
become international in scope. Believe it or not, some socialists believe that the
nation-state should be defended as a bulwark against capitalist repression. God-damn,
Chucky, haven't you heard of Horst Mahler? He's a major figure of the German nationalist
movement; he's also a radical leftist and ex-Marxist who believes very strongly in
socialism - and he's not an aberration. To be sure, WSWS is internationalist, but leftists
aren't as orthodox in their thinking as rightists are.
See:
http://www.nationalbolshevik.com/spartacus/spartacusmahler.html
and...
http://www.nationalbolshevik.com/spartacus/spartacusbaumgardner.
plus...
http://www.whiteracist.com/rev.html
"The developments in industry, science and the growth of world
economy meant that the nation-state was itself becoming an impediment to
the growth of the productive forces." Multiple proof by assertion.
You're reading more into it than you should. I think international cooperation in certain
areas, like Science, is a good thing. But it is of course true that the capitalists see
strong nation-states as an impediment to the productivity/efficiency of the
markets.
Christ, you campus-coffee-shop theorists talk about
"workers."
I resent that. I hate coffee. Always have and always will. And I ain't no campus
theorist, much less a Marxist.
Take it from a man who's actually spent time on a factory
floor
What a fucking hero. Service workers have it 100 times worse. The pre-requisite education
is hard enough, not to mention the ever more competitive work-place. Try taking a really
demanding job that doesn't involve mindless repetitive tasks as in a factory. Not many
factory workers get up at 5AM and work non-stop with NO lunch-break or leisure time until
6 or 7 in the evening. The service industry is a different story.
- ignorant niggers with big radios and Mexicans who don't speak English
are "an impediment to the growth of productive forces," not to mention Jews in
the front office running the place into the ground while their loud,
ugly, perfume-soaked wives buy furs on company credit cards.
No point in sawing away at this tired polemic; it's all WSWS has to
offer. Nothing to do with us.
All VNN has to offer is the crudest form of right-wing reaction known to man. It's a
useful source of information, even though it is run by borderline lunatics. But there's
nothing much about social issues beyond the obligatory right-wing hatred of leftists,
liberals, and socialists (most of them imaginary).
All sorts of peculiar people trying to get on the White Nationalist
train these days.
What "train"? It's more like a taxi cab being driven by a smelly, obnoxious Arab. Better
yet, its more like a yellow Ryder truck.
There are even Jews trying to steer it along.
So let me get this straight: because AR has had a few Jews at their conferences, this
means Jews are trying to "steer along" the White Resistance movement? Don't think so.
Once again, you're creating Jews out of thin air. My God, a Jew just crawled up onto my
computer screen! Where's the fly swatter?!
Now, comes Trotsky.
I hate Communism just as much as anybody else. But don't think that we're on the same side
just because we agree about some aspects of the racial/Jewish situation. It's a class
struggle as much as anything. And it is YOU who is the fake racialist, not me. Mine is a
genuine nationalism - social nationalism. Yours is a coffee-mug right-wing Christian
conservative pseudo-nationalism rooted in the basest kind of religious and ethnic
intolerance. I really can't express in harsh enough terms the anger I feel when some
Christian right-wing bible-thumping ignoramus claims to be standing up for our race. We
have nothing in common. It's a real pity that a self-professed "worker" such as yourself
has adopted the ideology of those who, in normal times, would be considered your
oppressors. Pan-Aryan socialist brotherhood is the answer, not right-wing
reaction.
Sorry, B.C. "No Jews- Just Right."
I never doubted this slogan in my original e-mail about your article. But if you are
casting doubt on my Aryan antecedents, then I must laugh. My mother's maiden name is Ary,
and her ancestors (as were my father's) were of overwhelmingly Germanic stock. Germanic
people named Ary - it doesn't get much more Aryan than that.
Brian L Copp
04/03/01
Subject: Check For Yourselves (Resend By Request)
CPTWC has claimed, in many mailings, that certain people control the lion's
share of popular American culture (TV, movies, newspapers, magazines, book
publishing). These people are, more often than not, mainly of one ethnic
(racial/genetic) group, CPTWC claims.
So, the next time you watch a television show, or movie, etc., or read a
magazine, newspaper, etc., which names the president or vice-president of
some leftist group, or names some television producer, or names some writer,
or movie director, etc., you can check for yourselves to see if they likely
belong to the ethnic group faulted frequently by CPTWC.
HOW TO RECOGNIZE JEWISH NAMES (by ethnicity; "Jewish" is a hybrid race as
well as a religion** (**Source: Book "Race," by John R. Baker, 1974, Oxford
University Press).
While this list may never be entirely complete, it will cover most Jewish
names one is likely to encounter in everyday life. (Unlike Christian names,
there is such a thing as a "Jewish name." Also called "Semitic-sounding
name.")
Most Jewish persons can be recognized by their surname (last name), although
not always- some are adopted, etc., or it simply does not sound Jewish or
Semitic.
Here are the main ones likely to be encountered:
-Names ending in "-berg" (Goldberg, Weinberg, etc.)
-Names ending in "-man" (Goldman, Lightman, etc.)
-Names ending in "-stein" (Einstein, Perlstein, etc., and also "-stien")
-Names that sound "precious" (Gold, Silver, Diamond, etc.)
-Names ending in "-ler" (Adler, Midler, etc.)
-Names ending in "-ner" (Asner, Lardner, etc.)
-Names ending in "-lin" (Gitlin, Sheindlin, etc.)
-Names ending in "-witz" (Horowitz, Rabinowitz, etc.) or "-itz"
-Names ending in "-baum" (Teitelbaum, Metzenbaum, etc.)
-Names ending in "-off" (Chartoff, Berkhoff, etc.)
-Names ending in "-nik" (Resnik, Mitnik, etc.)
-Names ending in "-thal" (Blumenthal, Rosenthal, etc.)
-Names ending in "-ling" (Spelling, Sperling, etc.)
-Names ending in "-sky" (Barshefsky, Linsky, etc.)
-Names ending in "-farb" (Himmelfarb, Goldfarb, etc.)
-Names ending in "-feld" (Seinfeld, Rosenfeld, etc.)
-Names ending in "-stone" (Wellstone, Firestone, etc.)
-Many (but not all) names ending in "-son" (Abelson, Josephson, etc.)
-Names (surnames) that sound "Biblical," e.g., David (as in "Larry David"),
Abram or Abraham, Joseph, Moses, Benjamin, etc.
Also, some very common Jewish names (note that these are not always Jewish):
-Miller
-Green
-Davis
-Ross
-Lewis
-Nash
-Stern
-Roth
------------------
CPTWC
(Center to Preserve Traditional Western Culture)
Arizona
04/02/01
Subject: Chicago Jewish News -- Jewish Chicago's Hometown Newspaper - Cover
Story
Americans beware- Jew Louis Lang will run for governor of Illinois.
Jews anywhere endanger Whites everywhere. Loyalties? The usual Jewish
Tornado. "He is a board member of many Jewish organizations, including
Mayer Kaplan JCC, the Jewish Federation’s Government Affairs Committee,
the Holocaust Memorial Foundation, the American Jewish Congress and the
National Jewish Democratic Council. He also belongs to Hadassah
Associates, B’nai B’rith Sports Lodge Decalogue Society of Lawyers and
the Zionist Organization of Chicago. He is a member of Temple Beth
Israel (Reform) in Skokie."
Lang, as a member of the Chosen People, claims an inborn "moral
authority" instead of the mere omnipresence which comes from
madly-driven _tikkun olam_, the Divine Mandate to re-make everyone
else's world for them, unasked. Here, the _chutzpah_, the self-referral,
the self-promotion. Jews claim that they're the standard to which
everything else must be compared. "While (Jews') numbers are not large,
we speak with a certain moral authority. When we stand up on the House
and Senate floor, people tend to listen. We come from a place that has a
serious measure of social justice, and people recognize that in us when
we speak. Our numbers are small but we have an impact. If not, how could
we have passed that Holocaust legislation bill (requiring Holocaust
education in public schools) and other pieces of legislation? We have an
ability that is greater than our numbers to change public policy," brags
Lang. "No Jews- Just Right," we say.
http://www.chijewishnews.com/cover.jsp#1336
[Anonymous]
04/02/01
Subject: Teens face prison for arm movements
The "freedom of expression" that Jews treasure- "Two 15-year-old
Czech schoolchildren are being investigated by police for allegedly
greeting each other in the halls of their school and elsewhere with
fascist salutes. If put on trial, the boys could be sentenced to up to
two-and-a-half years in prison for promoting fascism."- from JTA
[Anonymous]
04/01/01
Ed. note:Reader's LTE in response to this Seattle
feminist's column about Black Tuesday:
http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis/web/vortex/display?slug=brodeur29m&date=20010329
Hi
I just read your latest article and I can only shake my head in wonder
at the lengths white liberals like yourself will go to deny reality. I
guess this is what psychologists mean when they talk about "Cognitive
Dissonance," the unwillingness to acknowledge reality when it conflicts
with a deeply held belief system. More verification that modern liberalism
is less a political philosophy than a secular religion.
You state that you "... refuse to paint an entire group with a wilding
brush." How nice. Tell me, were there any black "leaders" who came out
and expressed sympathy for the white victims? How many blacks stood up and
denounced the black thugs who singled out whites for victimization? How
many blacks marched against the racism in their community? Did Jesse
Jackson or Al Sharpton put in an appearance and denounce the black on white
violence that claimed the life of Mr. Kime? You know the answer to those
questions. Aside from a weak general-purpose lament about violence, the
black "leaders" of Seattle have spent most of their time whining about being
seen as criminals.
They shouldn't worry however. Since each and every black person in
Seattle wasn't at Pioneer Square, they can count on self-deluded, guilt-
ridden whites like yourself to smugly point out that ALL blacks aren't
guilty. Why, the vast majority of blacks in Seattle didn't kill any white
people at all that night. And hey, were there not some drunken white kids
who turned over a car and broke some windows? There, you see? The problem
isn't "black racism" (only whites are racist after all), no no, the problem
is "violence." We all just need to get together, hold hands and sing Cum
Bah Yah. No wonder that some of the blacks that night were overheard
expressing their contempt for white people ("stupid white people, that's
what you get..") We must seem like sheep waiting for the slaughter to them.
They can even count on the sheep like yourself to self-righteously lecture
your fellow sheep on the evil of thinking that ALL WOLVES ARE BAD after
every new victim.
Your passing comments about "Wonder Bread heads" and "being white and
raised with a life of privilege" tell your story loud and clear. I've seen
it many times in the kids who come and go through college. After 12 years of
public school and 4 more years in college they have it drilled over and over
again into their skulls that they are evil because they are white and have a
few goodies that others don't. Completely brainwashed by the time they
leave, especially if they studied in a non science/engineering field, they
are eager to expiate the guilt of their "White bread privilege" and
demonstrate their commitment to the New Liberal Religion with the zeal of a
convert.
Quite candidly, while I have seen this mental pathology up close and
personal many times, I'm at a loss as to what to do about it. After seeing
the denial and excuse-making of whites in South Africa and Zimbabwe as they
are murdered, robbed, raped and driven off their land (otherwise known as
ethnic cleansing), after seeing cases where victims of black violence have
denied that "race had anything to do with it" even when the black
perpetrators used racial epithets and admitted choosing victims based on
race, after seeing white people refuse to band together and refuse to defend
themselves for fear of being thought a "racist," and after watching white
people the world over sit back and watch as their civilization is being
overrun with obstreperous and ungrateful third world immigrants, I guess I
shouldn't expect that the Seattle violence is going to wake white people up
to reality either. The reality that they are in an undeclared racial war,
whether they want to be or not, and whether they accept the fact of race or
not. The only model that I can compare it to is some nutty religious
suicide cult.
In a way, that's exactly what modern liberalism is. Ayn Rand called
August Comte the "Father of Altruism" and it is Altruism that is at the
heart of modern liberalism (as distinct from Classical Liberalism). As a
Philosophy, Altruism is not simply a warm and fuzzy notion about helping
your neighbors. Rather it is a doctrine that demands self-sacrifice as the
highest moral ideal of Man. Any act in one's own self-interest is by
definition evil. The only true morality comes from sacrificing one's own
self-interest for someone else's. This is what children in America and most
western nations are taught these days (though few bother to study Comte or
Kant, just as many "Marxists" rarely bother to read any Marx), and this is why
they have such a hard time defending themselves and their civilization.
After having been inculcated in the faith for 16 years of their life, they
have bought completely into the tenets of the new-age religion. They feel
guilty about being, ostensibly, "privileged" because they are white. They
make a big show of hating their own kind ("Wonder Bread heads") because it
demonstrates their moral superiority. It must feel good to be able to play
at being "holier than thou" after a lifetime of being told how evil you are,
and the guilt-ridden whites jump at the chance to finally wear their
morality on their sleeve even if it means their own destruction.
Show them a picture of hell, then offer them the only path to salvation.
This is the classic tactic of the cult, and modern liberalism has used it
well. How do you convince a cultist to snap out of it? How do you convince
white people that they are destroying themselves? How do you pull them away
from their destruction when they believe their destruction is a
consequence of their superior morality? I don't know. I just don't know. I
do know, however, that the Pioneer Square riot is a symptom of a deeper
social pathology and your whitewashing of the racial violence, Ms Brodeur,
will only help insure that we see it happen more frequently as the
"Oppressed Minorities" learn what "stupid white people" we've become.
John Gapp
04/01/01
Subject: The hell that is Los Angeles
The article VNN linked to at-
http://www.latimes.com/communities/news/anaheim-santa_ana_metro/20010330/t000027428.html
deserves an award for "Headline of the Week." "A Deepening
Diversity, _BUT_ A Growing Divide?"
The outrageous anti-White smear intensifies- we're hearing this one
increasingly;
"Technical writer Juniko Moody, 42, said she moved to Santa Clarita
despite her concerns that it is overwhelmingly white."
Too much peace and quiet, eh? Not enough crime, crack, drive-bys!
Moody, of course, embodies Eleanor Roosevelt's ideal of uniform,
olive-drab-colored Unesco Man who would eliminate racism by eliminating
race- "she is part African American, part Asian and part Native
American."
"Immigrants more than replaced those who deserted Los Angeles' urban
core, outweighing a 15.4% drop in the city's white population and a
11.5% decrease in the number of African Americans." "Tidal wave," says
the story.
What can you say about a situation so bad that even niggers run
away? The real story is told by the red LED signs Mexicans put in their
car windows- "FUCK YOU- THIS IS STILL MEXICO."
[Anonymous]
04/01/01
Subject: Race, Tories and Media
I read the BBC article about the big stink over Mr. Townend's speech with a mixture of
amused contempt & utter loathing. The mandatory charade of clothes-rending horror on the
part of the race traitor scum the moment anyone bravely speaks the truth about the darkies
ruining White society is as laughable as it is predictable. Note the way the "right-wing"
Tories stumble all over themselves in their haste to condemn one of their own. They
wouldn't want to alienate those legions of nigger & Paki Conservatives, now would they?
Such a cowardly mob of shitheads deserves to lose to the Labour roaches.
And how about those photos the totally fair BBC Jews chose for the story, eh? Townend
smirking with eyes narrowed; Enoch Powell scowling in the shadows; Tebbit looking like a
turtle that's been dead for a month.
The Kikes have GOT to be sent packing, that's all there is to it.....
N.B. Forrest
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|