|
Letters through 7/10/02
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject: Cat Lady - Wolzek
Dear VNN,
I am perplexed by Victor Wolzek's dissent from my review of "Minority Report." Surely my humble reviews are not worthy of having their virtues or their flaws examined under a lens so powerful that it can magnify molehills into mountains. Yes, my line that there is no minority report in "Minority Report" is a mere rhetorical flourish, not an objection to the movie. That was clear from the context. I reiterate my objection to the "psychoanalytic" treatment of John Anderton's (Tom Cruise's) motives. I do not care if Anderton's choice is a plausible reaction to the trauma of losing his son, I am tired of trauma as a motivating factor. Wolzek completely misses my marriage counseling point, which is that even in the film's universe one has to appeal to more than just trauma to explain Anderton's choice. I have not made any important life decisions because of traumas, and I suspect that most people do not. So I am weary--and wary--of Hollywood laboring to establish trauma as an almost universal explanation of motives in films today. Jews are sick people, and I am suspicious of their attempts to convince all humanity that they are just as sick as Jews are. I retiterate my objection that Anderton's reaction to the prediction that he is going to commit a murder is unrealistic. He does not display enough conflict, which leads one to question his commitment to pre-crime and the coherence of his character in general. As for Tom's shaved skull: perhaps I missed the scene where his head was shaved, but it still seems like just one more pretentious and arbitrary bit of weirdness thrown into the incoherent mix. As for Wolzek's choice to interpret the film in a pro-White manner: One can choose the interpret the film any way one wants when one does not consider the director's intent. But if one considers who and what Steven Spielberg is, then there is no possibility of interpreting "Minority Report" as a pro-White film, even though, as I noted, the racial politics of the film allow far more reality to shine through than is usual in Hollywood.
The Cat Lady
======================================
Subject: Grimstad
William Grimstad's "Anti-Zion" is available on-line--the greatest collection evah of Jew-Wise "hate", it's!!
http://www.ety.com/HRP/booksonline/antizion/aztoc.htm
Check out the heartwarming section on Jewish "anti-semites".
======================================
Subject: "good for Jews"
Maybe lurkers or other casual readers of VNN think we're exaggerating about
the Jews. Like their central ethical aphorism: "Is it good for Jews?" Jews
say that, we quote it. We didnt make it up.
Liberals and sometimes people who have "good Jews" as friends like to think
that Jews are idealistic and want to help their fellow man. Hence Marxism,
Freud, etc., on down to the Dershowitzim of today incl that most recent
manifestation of the kike krusader pledge of allegiance Jew Newdow.
Well here is an article from Forward entitled "the Ethics of Jewish Power."
[no oxymoron intended!] by Rabbi Irving Greenberg.
Let me quote the first and last paras.:
"Are there ethical limits to the Jewish exercise of power? Is Israel living
up to these standards? How do we judge in such matters?
...
Jewry and the State of Israel must not surrender to exhaustion nor yield
moral scruples in the face of fear, rage and despair. As Maimonides points
out in Deuteronomy 30:15, we are told: "I place before you today life and
good, and death and evil." We must choose both life and good; for in the
end, they are one."
---------------------------------------
I want to point out that if 'life and good" are one in the same, then
whatever sustains life is good. Knowing of course, that the jews are using
code here and "life" means Jewish life. In other words, whatever sustains
Jewish life is good. Which must logically include "any means necessary"
including the full panopoly of Jewish misdeeds, like Bolshevism, engineering
the destruction of the US via "civil rights" and colored immigration, and
the atrocities of the bandit state of Israel against unarmed Palestinians
day after recent day.
In other words, might makes right. Might employed according to the "what is
good for Jews" standard.
Make no mistake about it, all Jews follow this, incluing Norm Finkelstein,
Israel Shahak types. They just think it's good for Jews if they would stop
being such hateful liars (sorry guys, it's in your nature.)
If that's the way the game is played, then Whites ought to start getting
serious.
Tim K
======================================
Subject: Jew Newdow
here is the link to the forward piece stating the Newdow, the litigant in
the pledge of allegiance case, is a Jew. This makes for a great email to
all your Christian and "conservative" or "patriotic" friends. As alex said,
usually they try to get a non-Jew to push these kinds of things, but it
looks like Newdow is just a stereotypical subversive Jew doing what comes
naturally. Thanks, Jews! More proof positive.
http://www.forward.com/issues/2002/02.07.05/news9.html
Tim K
Ed. Note: A nickel to anybody who can find a single leghound columnist who mentions that Newdow is a Jew.
======================================
Subject: EAIF v. ADL
European/American Issues Forum
CW Kuhn, Secy. M. Piercy, Treasurer, FP Williams, Sgt. at
Arms
Stephen Mc Nallen, President------Aida T. Cordano,
Vice-President
News Release
July 10, 2002
Contact: Lou Calabro (650) 952-8489
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE PROMOTES RACIAL HATRED.
Will there be an Investigation or a Coverup?
Attend
San Francisco Human Rights Commission Meeting
Thursday July 11, 2002, 4:30 PM SHARP
San Francisco City Hall, Room 416 Meeting Room
The European/American Issues Forum filed a formal complaint
against the San
Francisco Anti-Defamation League (ADL) on June 5, 2002 with
the San Francisco
Human Rights Commission. The ADL promotes the idea that
European Americans
are not victims of racial animus, and therefore they are
the purveyors of
racial animus and the perpetrators of hate crimes.
In this instance the ADL placed a full page ad in the San
Francisco Chronicle
on 5/30/02 titled "The Covenant to Eradicate Anti-Semitism
and Hate in the B
ay Area". The ad recognized major racial/ethnic groups as
victims of
hatred, except European Americans. Other examples of the ADL
Õs attitude
toward European Americans were included in the complaint.
Repeated telephone calls have been made to Director Virginia
Harmon and Chair
Ghada Saliba-Malouf of the SF Human Rights Commission
(HRC)to determine the
status of the complaint, without the courtesy of a
response.
There is fear in the European American community that Mayor
Willie L. Brown
Jr., a man whose racial attitude toward European Americans
has been in
question before, has ordered the HRC to "round file" the
complaint.
According to the HRCÕs website "The Human Rights Commission
works to provide
leadership and advocacy to secure, protect and promote human
rights for all
people."
We hope they understand that European Americans ARE people,
and conduct a
thorough investigation into our complaint. Driving a racial
wedge between
European Americans and all other racial groups is
destructive and divisive,
and does not belong in a civilized society.
Hatred should be eradicated, not promoted.
The European/American Issues Forum is a moderate and
thoughtful Bay Area
civil rights organization dedicated to the eradication of
discrimination
against and defamation of European Americans. We do not
denigrate or slur
other racial/ethnic groups and welcome those who support our
policy.
Louis Calabro
European/American Issues Forum
PMB155
297 El Camino Real
San Bruno, Ca. 94066
(650) 952-8489
Fax (650) 869-7215
www.eaif.org
======================================
Subject: keeping money local
Tim K. always has good suggestions. VNN writers are wonderfully knowledgeable and entertaining. I support buying in my own community wholeheartedly as I know who owns the businesses. So what if you pay a few shekels more. The small businessman cannot compete with the giants. In my town, the Wal-Marts, K-Marts etc do not buy anything locally. Recently an enormous entity was purchased from a local man and they publicly promised to continue to do business with the local purveyors. Big fat lie. The restaurant chains also hire builders and pavers from out of town. Most of these biggies get tax breaks for moving in. The little local guys that have been here for years get no such consideration and continue to foot the bills.
A woman on my bowling league was coming around collecting money for the women of Afghanistan to go back to school. When she approached my team I asked her why the heck would I give money to them when probably half the women on this league have kids with tuition bills? She said it would be "so nice" to support these "women". My gender-traitorous team graciously declined this opportunity to demonstrate our international goodwill and thanked me for speaking up. Two of them said they would've given something so as not to appear stingy.
When you are feeling fortunate, instead of throwing your money at charities, try helping a young family whom you know pay a dentist bill, or treat an elderly person to something they'd like or can't afford. Or donate to VNN!
Whatever happened to "Charity Begins at Home"? Till the day my mother died she wouldn't buy a thing that said "Made in Japan". Oops, I'm starting to ramble..
Grandma
======================================
Subject: Baker and the fired izzies
Clarification on Dr. Baker's Sacking of ....
First I admire Ms. Bakers stand.
However, the media (at least few of the links that I have looked) are depicting her action as if though she is sacrificing two individuals careers and livelihood in the name of principles. Furthermore the media either out of ignorance or malice are linking the positions of the two individual to the University and or institutions related to universities.
As I understand the two Israelis were simply in the board (I assume editorial board) of the Journal. The journal was RAN, OWNED, and SUSTAINED by Ms Baker. I myself served in an editorial boards of few Journals. These positions are not REAL JOBS!
You simply continue working at your old job, occasionally an articles is sent to you that you then judge to see whether it is appropriate for publication. If subject matter of the article falls within the scope of the Journal's subject matter, the editor than simply sends the article to few anonymous reviewers who then make their recommendations and comments to help the editor to decide on publishing or rejecting the article. At any rate, beside the prestige within a small circle, these position bring no financial gains. They simply add to your CV and are acknowledgments of your expertise in the field. Perhaps with exception of chief editor others don't get paid.
I also read that the two Israelis were asked to resign and they refused. This itself shows an incredible amount of arrogance. Two Israelis who live and work in Israel are asked by British who owns and runs the journal, to kindly leave her alone, and yet they refuse. Why? It her damn Journal. There are people who have lost REAL JOBS and have their LIVES RUINED for not dancing to the tunes of their chief editors, and we are suppose to believe that a calamity of sort has fallen on these two individual and that a cold hearted women has trampled two innocent victims.
FUCK THIS PRESS. I AM SICK OF THEM
PS, some of Tim K's article should be in the main section. He is good!!!
======================================
Subject:
Mr. Linder:
A few thoughts. I have noticed that it upsets you when writers don't explicitly name jews in their writings, or acknowledge the demon jew.
ie: Cantrill, Rockwell.
Personally, I believe they DO know the extent of the jews influence and they either ignore it or use other words to describe this creature. Here are some thoughts as to why they don't.
Lew Rockwell: he is president of the Mises institute. Mises was a jew. The modern disciples of Mises is Murray Rothbard, another jew. A number of the writers for LRC are jews. To keep themselves somewhat from the fringes, they avoid expressing their anti-jew thoughts, otherwise you know what will haappen. The jew rascist machine wil go to work on them. The implications are obvious, especially when one is trying to get more "mainstream" credibility amongst the population.
With respect to Mises and Rothbard, and Ayn Rand ( another russian jew), their politics and ideology were clearly detrimental to the two most dangerous strains of the jew creature, money and bolshevism.
This presented a problem for the creature, so much so, that more cunning means must be used. Discredit their ideologies, or in most cases ignore them from their publications and other media. newspapers, tv, and radio. This is the most common tact. Even Dr. R. Oliver knew this. He read and quoted Rothbard on occaison, but never referred to him with his regular vitriol he had for the former mentioned jew creatures. I believe he knew Rothbards ideologies necessarlily discredited the two strains, therefore it was important NOT to label him in this fashion.
You wil find from time to time the word Bolshevism used by market anarchists. Who do you think they are referring to? Right, the jew. By following this approach, it makes it difficult for the creature to use his screams of racism as a tool for discrediting the author. I believe this is the correct path when pursuing respectability within the framework these guys operate. I have on a number of occaisons posted writings on message boards, using a term stolen from I believe dr. Oliver, that is judeo-bolshevik or judeo bolshevism. This is a more effect tactic. One because it equates judaism with one of the most hated ideologies ever to exist. Bolshevism. It also allows the author using this term to easily defend himself against attacks of anti semiticism. how? 0f the 550 or so members of the original Bolshevik inner circle, over 350 were jews. So the author using this term Bolshevism, or judeo- bolshevism is simply stating facts. guilt by association. Hey this is the tactic jews use all the time by saying america is based on judeo-christian value, therefore equating the judaism as a compliment to christianity, and gaining INSTANT credibility and sympathy from the non jew white christian boobs. Look how well they havde suceeded in this. I saw that white peon Ralph Reed on Fox a couple weeks back with some rabbi talking about how jews and christians are kindred. The smug little smile on Reeds face while the jew was blessing him made me want pull that little christian peon into my living room and lay a beating on him that he would never forget. Haha. This guy Reed, like other evangelivals, have been assimilted into the Borg..err Jew collective. Stupid fucks. Reed and his kind will get theirs first in my mind. All in due time.
Also, there was a link to an article some time ago, posted on LRC I believe, trying to label F. A. Hayek as an anti semite. Now Hayek is one of, if not the most respected writer of the austrian school of economics( Mises being the most respected one in this school of economics, founded in the earlier work of the scholastics, catholics, who probably new what the jew creature had in store for us) and won a nobel prize. But why did the author try to discredit him, Hayek, as an anti semite, but nowhere in the article did it mention Mises? I think you can make the connection. Oh yeah the author of the Attack on Hayek was well..you know..a jew.
You may all know this already. Just thought I would send my thoughts along. I believe your work is needed as well as a more subtle approach in using language to bring the message home. I use the second approach for reason's which you can understand, maybe not agree with, but certainly understand. I hope in the near future to be able to make a financial contribiution to help keep your work going.
Thanks for your time.
SR
P.S. I too wondered immediately about Newdow as soon as I read the articles about the Pledge case. I saw him on O'reilly and couldn't quite tell if he was part of the demon creature, but if he isn't I beliee he at least has supporters who are. Something to investigate. Should I discover such, I will surely pass it along.
On the Pledge itself. We must oppose this, which unfortunatly, means we take the Newdow side, but for different reasons. Francis Bellamy, the supossed author (which is in dispute) was a Bolshevik. So was his cousin Michael(?)Bellamy, the author of "looking backword". The words to the Pledge, even without the god reference, CLEARLY instill in the mind, submission to the STATE. The STATE also is indivisible. It has been one of the most effective tools of propoganda any Bolshevik could ask for in indoctrinating children FOR LIFE. White children. Which is of course why it was never opposed by jews. It suits their goals. I told my two eldest boys last year, 3rd and 1st graders respectively, that they were NOT to recite this in their classroom with the other kids for former stated reason. If it was the other away around, that is supporting the principles of the origianl republic the founders envisioned, the jew creature would have discredited the Pledge years ago and it would be in the dust bin of history.
Ed. Note: Judeo-bolshevism comes directly from the Nazis as far as I know. It is a good terms to use, not least because it picks up on and mocks 'Judeo-Christian.' It is interesting that Oliver was better educated than anybody in racialism today, and he used slurs like nobody's business. Using slurs is not the difference maker some think. On the whole it is more effective to use slurs than not to use them, in my opinion. As for Newdow, whether he is a jew or not is interesting, but a footnote. The main point is that jews created the circumstances in which such a case could be brought - successfully. Cantrell does a good job of explaining the meaning and purpose of the Pledge in the article linked to on the main page. ... As for the Rockwells and Rothbards, they are driving off different premises toward different conclusions. Their economic analysis is largely correct. But their ideological commitment to indivdiualism makes it hard for them to recognize the political reality that jews are working as a group against Whites, using minorities as tools. They do recognize that the most prominent anti-freedom "carriers" are jews, but their cowardice kicks in, and they remain safely impotent, making careful, factual arguments that go nowhere because they don't have what it takes to acquire political power to enforce them. People don't want freedom, people want something for nothing.
======================================
Subject: WCOTC Minister Jailed
PRESS RELEASE
(For Immediate Release)
July 9, 2002
WCOTC MINISTER SENT TO PRISON FOR REFUSING TO FORSAKE HIS RELIGIOUS BELIEFS
"SICK ACTION BY CRIMINALS WILL NOT GO UNPUNISHED", LEADER OF CHURCH SAYS
In an action truly revealing the depths to which those in power have gone
in seeking to deprive the American people of their constitutional freedoms,
Rev. Tony Menear, ordained minister and Massachusetts State Leader of the
World Church of the Creator, has been deemed in violation of his parole for
refusing to give up his religious beliefs and practice of those beliefs. He
was hauled off to prison yesterday days after being told that he either must
quit membership in his Church or face up to twelve years in prison (see Rev.
MenearÕs attached account of what happened written on Sunday).
The WCOTC is the fastest growing White racist and anti-Semitic church in
America. Founded in 1973 by former Florida State Legislator Ben Klassen, it
today has members in 48 states and 28 foreign countries. It embraces the
religion of "Creativity" whose goal is the survival, expansion, and
advancement of the White Race exclusively. Recently, Creativity was ruled a
bona fide religion by Judge Lynn Adelman in the Federal District Court in
Milwaukee, Wisconsin (a copy of this decision is available upon request).
Reverend Matt Hale, the leader of the WCOTC, stated today: "The arrest
and incarceration of Reverend Tony Menear is manifestly unconstitutional and
in fact, criminal. Reverend Menear was told by the black parole supervisor
that he didnÕt like his religion and ordered him to forsake it or go back to
prison. Having more character than the dogs of the parole board, Reverend
Menear refused to do this. This sick action by criminals will not go
unpunished. We will today be contacting the ACLU seeking representation of
Rev. Menear as well as the United States Justice Department seeking a
criminal indictment of the parole officers in involved--especially this
nigger named Philix Claxton. The latterÕs phone number is (617) 592-4462.
No matter what anyone thinks of our religion, the idea that you can send a
man to prison purely based on his religious beliefs is absolutely repugnant
to everything that America is about."
Lastly, Reverend Hale said, "I challenge the media to call the
Massachusetts parole board and see if they defy the fact that Reverend Menear
was found in ÔviolationÕ of his parole for nothing more than having
religious beliefs they donÕt like. Talk to Don Giancioppo, Philix Claxton,
and Lori Mansfield. Ask them the tough questions."
For further information and comment, contact Reverend Hale at (309)
694-4444.
*End of Press Release*
======================================
Subject: Israel: apartheid state<
Hi Alex. Here's two good versions of the latest jew outrage.
Peter
'Jews-Only' Law Ignites Firestorm
By Bradley Burston
Ha'aretz Correspondent
7-8-2
A proposed law that would allow Jews to bar Arabs from buying homes in
their communities could expose Israel to a fresh wave of condemnation
recalling the now-rescinded UN resolution equating Zionism and racism, critics of the bill said Wednesday.
In a decision that set off a storm of debate, Prime Minister Ariel
Sharon's cabinet Sunday voted to endorse a bill that would allow areas
within Israel which have been designated as state land to be devoted to residential use by Jews alone. The bill still faces considerable legislative hurdles before it can be passed into law.
Although worded in the gray phraseology of legislative practice, the
measure goes to the heart of a crucial dichotomy of modern Israel: how to
maintain a pluralistic state that is at once formally Jewish in character and
genuinely democratic in practice.
"If we are not already totally an apartheid state, we are getting much,
much closer to it," said former cabinet minister and leftist Meretz party
founder Shulamit Aloni.
"We are also moving farther and farther away from the founding document
of the state of Israel," she said, in a reference to the nation's 1948
Declaration of Independence, which pledged "development of the country for the
benefit of all its residents" and "complete social and political equality
to all its citizens, regardless of religion, race, or gender."
The bill was prompted by a landmark Supreme Court ruling over the efforts
of the northern Israel Jewish village of Katzir to bar an Israel Arab
from buying a house there. Although defined as a "community settlement", without the complex communal interrelationships of kibbutzim and moshavim, Katzir residents voted to keep Israeli Arab Adel Ka'adan from buying a plot and building a house there.
After years of legal wrangling, the court in March, 2000, accepted
Ka'adan's argument that the policy of the Jewish Agency, the
quasi-governmental body which adminsters state lands for many Jewish villages, discriminated against Arab citizens and was therefore illegal.
Sponsored by National Religious Party MK Haim Druckman, critics said the
proposed law was designed to bypass the court decision, formalizing
descimination on Israel's lawbooks. Education Minister Limon Livnat, who spearheaded the cabinet decision to ratify the bill, said the purpose of the measure was to clarify de facto policies in founding specifically Jewish communities within the nation.
"This does not stem at all from discrimination, rather from the main basis of Zionism - the return of the Jewish people to its land." Livnat dismissed suggestions that the bill was anti-democratic, saying
that each sector in israel should be allowed to live among its own.
JUST LIKE JIM CROW IN AMERICA.
[Israel Changes Everything. It's wrong for Whites in America or Europe to protect their communities. That's racism. When Israel does it, it's not only holy but Americans -- the same White Americans who are denied similar protections as immoral and Unconstitutional -- must subsidize it. And then all we read in the kikes papers is about never ask why kikes are hated. Oy, there's no reason.]
Moreover, she said, "All of us were raised on the same Zionist values, according to which, the state of Israel may, from the standpoint of national security - the wider view of security, not necessarily of concrete security ... foster the value of a Galilee with a Jewish majority."
But cabinet minister Dan Meridor, a conspicuous dissenter as the cabinet
endorsed the bill by a wide margin, denounced the proposed law as "a
grave error" and "flagrantly discriminatory".
"It is not permissible to allow an Israeli law to state that a non-Jew
may be prevented from living in a particular place for security reasons,"
Meridor
said. "This is not a security matter at all. There is no need for
flagrant discrimination." Indeed, he said, by contrast to discrimination
that Jews have
experienced in the Diaspora, the Jewish state legally does not
discriminate against non-Jews.
"As to the charges that Zionism is racism - what are we ourselves saying
here?"
In one of the darkest moments of Israeli diplomacy, the United Nations
passed a resolution in 1975 declaring that "Zionism is a form of racism
and racial
discrimination."
Over the past two years, however, the collapse of the Israeli-Palestinian
peace process, coupled with open warfare betwen the sides, have revived
Arab-led
denunciations of Israel as a state that practices racism akin to South
Africa's long-repealed apartheid regulations that overtly favored whites
over blacks
and people of mixed race.
Aloni, an attorney, said Israel had already put segregation into effect
in a number of ways, among them in appropriating Arab-owned land,
designating it
as "state land," and earmarking it for use by specifically Jewish towns
and villages. She angrily dismissed suggestions that the law was an
outgrowth of
Israeli-Arab rioting at the outset of the current Palestinian uprising.
"If you see this as a life-and-death matter, that means that the state of
Israel
views its Arab citizens as the enemy."
"Perhaps we should turn every Israeli Arab village into a detention camp,
like we do in the occupied territories, so that Druckman and the rest of
the messianics
could take away their land as well," Aloni said. "By the right of our
might, we are acting as a racist nation. South Africa, as well, was white
and democratic.
But that was not the intention here."
The debate over the law split Ariel Sharon's ruling Likud party, with
Justice Minister Meir Sheetrit, in the past a relative moderate on such
issues, left
sitting firmly on the fence. "Legislation such as this has international
repercussions that are not good for the state of Israel," said Sheetrit,
who abstained
in the Sunday cabinet vote.
"I don't think that this must be made into law. I don't believe that you
should make a law that specifies that one discriminates against someone
from the
standpoint of his rights in the state of Israel. On the other hand, I can
certainly understand that there are population groups in Israel who wish
to live
apart, particularly community settlements, like Bedouin, Arab, Jewish,
Christian or any other category for that matter."
Asked why he refrained from voting against the proposed law, Sheetrit
said, "There is a central question on this point - Is there a conflict
between the
values of a Jewish state and of a democratic state? If such a conflict
does exist, it must be reduced to the minimum.
"We must reach an understanding, but not by means of laws or Supreme
Court appeals to force people to accept into their midst people who will
spur disputes
and trouble within the community ... But if there's no problem, there's
no reason not to let them live there, whether Jew, (Muslim) Arab, or
Christian."
As the debate over the proposed law intensified, Livnat said she viewed
the decision as "a very great victory for those who view Israel as a
democratic
Jewish state as opposed as those who see it as the nation of all its
citizens. There is no racism in this."
Livnat bristled when an interviewer on state-owned Israel Radio went
further, drawing a parallel to anti-Semitic laws in Nazi Germany. "When
the Jews came
here after the World War Two Nazi Holocaust, perhaps it would not have
been expected that Jews would do something like this to Arabs," the
interviewer
said.
"Any comparison of this type is totally unacceptable," Livnat replied.
"Are we exterminating a people? Are we killing people, or forcing them
into "Any
comparison of this type is totally unacceptable," Livnat replied. "Are
concentration camps? How can anyone make such a comparison?"
http://www.haaretzdaily.com/hasen/
=======
Outrage At Israeli Plan To Keep Arabs And Jews Apart
By Ross Dunn in Jerusalem
TheAge.com.au
7-8-2
The Israeli cabinet has approved legislation that would support towns for
Jews only and bar Arabs from buying homes in their communities, sparking
outrage from ministers who dissented from the decision.
Dan Meridor, a minister without portfolio, described as "flagrantly
discriminatory" a bill that would enable state land to be apportioned for
Jews only.
The bill was proposed by Haim Druckman, a member of the National
Religious Party, one of the factions that make up the coalition
government of Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon.
The move is designed to effectively overturn a landmark decision by the
High Court, which ruled two years ago that Arab citizens of Israel (who
number more
than one million) had the right to live in communal settlements located
on state land, regardless of whether the majority population is Jewish.
"The decision (of the cabinet) places us in a bad situation, changing our
image in our land and in the world," Mr Meridor said. He said the bill's
author
had misused the concept of security to justify the aim of preventing Arab
ownership inside Jewish communities.
"This is not a security matter at all," he said. "There is no need for
flagrant discrimination." Mr Meridor said until now the Jewish state had
not legally
discriminated against non-Jews.
He said he doubted the late Menachem Begin, the first Israeli prime
minister to forge a peace treaty with an Arab state, would have
considered holding a
debate on a law under which land of any sort would be granted only to
Jews.
"This is a grave error, and a move whose results will be very bad, for us
internally... and for the image of Zionism," he said. Mr Meridor said
that in
the past Israel had been open to a smear campaign that "Zionism is
racism" and this legislation would only play into the hands of the
nation's enemies.
The High Court voted four to one in March, 2000, in favour of a petition
by an Arab couple, Mr A'adel and Mrs Iman Ka'adan, seeking permission to
buy land
and build a home in the settlement of Ktazir, established by the Jewish
Agency.
Before the ruling, Israeli Arabs had been unable to build or move to the
community because the Jewish Agency deals only with Jewish settlements
and the
local community leaders accepted only Jews.
In another development, the Israeli cabinet also approved legislation
aimed at preventing Palestinians claiming compensation for damages
sustained during
the Israeli Army's operations in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
Here.
======
Here.
Monday, 8 July, 2002, 17:40 GMT 18:40 UK
Arab ban proposed in Jewish areas
Israeli Arabs
Israel has more than a million Arab citizens
Human rights groups in Israel are vowing to fight a government decision
that would prevent Israeli Arabs from moving into Jewish communities
built on state land within Israel.
Seventeen cabinet ministers voted on Sunday to support a bill brought by
a right-wing MP in response to a Supreme Court ruling that would have
allowed an
Arab nurse to move into a Jewish village in the north of the country.
No other government in the democratic world would have adopted such a law
Yossi Sarid, Israel opposition leader
The proposed law aims to preserve the character of certain Jewish
communities inside Israel by making it harder for non-Jews to buy land
there.
According to Israeli media, the bill empowers the quasi-governmental
Jewish Agency, which leases about 93% of state land, to establish
exclusively Jewish
communities on land it administers.
The man behind the proposal, Haim Druckman, has described the cabinet's
support for it as one of the government's finest hours, a decision that
he said
put colour back into the cheeks of Zionism.
But civil rights activists and left-wing politicians have reacted with
horror.
Yossi Sarid, the leader of the left-wing opposition Meretz party in
parliament, and several Arab MPs have condemned the cabinet's decision.
Mr Sarid told the BBC that the decision was shameful, racist and totally
unacceptable.
Government backing
The controversial bill has its origins in an attempt by Arab Adel
Kaadanan and his family from northern Israel to move into the nearby
Jewish village of
Katzir, which was set up by the Jewish Agency on state land in 1982.
Palestinian protests
The proposed ban has already embittered Israeli-Arab relations
Anyone wishing to move into a rural area within Israel designated by the
government as a "community settlement" has to be accepted by a committee
from the
settlement.
The community of Katzir refused to accept Mr Kaadanan but two years ago
Israel's Supreme Court over-ruled the village's decision.
Katzir continued to refuse to admit Mr Kaadanan and the village has now
won the government's backing.
The Association for Civil Rights in Israel has described the cabinet vote
as alarming and unconstitutional, because it contradicted the basic right
of equality.
The law still has to be passed by parliament and the legality of the move
could be challenged by the Supreme Court.
But it has already further embittered relations between Israel's Jewish
and Arab populations, which have been badly soured by the current climate
of mistrust
in the Middle East.
======================================
Subject: Israel: apartheid state
Alex,
Here is an article describing Izzy's policies in the
Apartheid State of dirty Jews. Satan's spawn are the
only people allowed to own property. The link is as
follows:
http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=313305
Also, if you haven't already, you may want to check
out the latest Duke report. It contains an additional
UK Independent story that describes letters received
from Jews threatening self-hating Jews in Berkeley,
California.
-Peter Taylor
======================================
Subject: anthropophagy
interesting that the Atlantic article didnt mention that the Anasazi Indians
were cannibals. Yes, anthropophages. There was ample evidence, then some
multiculti Boas type truth-deniers tried to obfuscate the issue, then a
couple years ago some scientist took Anasazi coprolites (fossilized feces)
and did a DNA analysis, and Voila! irrefutable proof of cannibalism. WSJ
did a nice article on the "debate."
Of course the omitted fact makes the Anasazi and even more apt comparison.
White cannibalism is not practiced by Whites literally, I think our
government policies have taken on a kind of metaphoric anthropophagy, where
the fedgov is allowing the White organic community to dismantle and consume
some of its most important elements.
I didnt make this metaphor of White self-consumption up, some other WN did.
Probably Ygg. Let me know if you've heard it before, I'd like to link the
article but I can't recall where I saw it.
Tim Kv
======================================
Subject: Judeo-Bolshevism
Mr. Linder:
I am sure you have seen this, if no here it is. Judeo Bolshevism at its finest. They want the presidency back. Their lives must be so incomplete without it. Now all they have to do is find another lap dog. Clitman was perfect: WASP, loved by the ladies, and no illusions of anything than being president. As much as I despise Hitlary, she knew who the deviousness of the Jew. Finding another like him may be difficult..at least for the next election cycle.
SR
Here.
======================================
Subject: Baltics
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig3/maltsev1.html
A good commentary on ZOG/Bolshevist atrocities and control tactics in
Lithuania and elsewhere, past and present. I believe his comment, "Every
third Lithuanian was either murdered by the NKVD or German SS thugs, or
ended up perishing in a dreadful Gulag." to be somewhat misinformed; most of
the Einsatzgruppen assigned to the Baltic states were there to kill jewish
communists, and jews comprised a fairly large piece of Lithuania's
population. So, my take is, the Lithuanian jews were the SS targets, the
gentile natives were cannon fodder for the Soviet jew commissars.
Best,
The Metal Warrior
(p.s. - Got a t-shirt...very nice, simple design and a quality tee)
======================================
Subject: AWF articles
I see AWF has written some new stuff for Elisha's page. Cutting through a
little bit of chaff, here's a good one. I'm sending this one out to a few
other "WFs."
http://www.elishastrom.com/awf/feminism.html
re the chaff: WN websites all dont need to target the same market segments.
Producers of content shouldnt take a little bit of producte differentiation
so personally.
AWF- keep producing!
Tim K
Ed. Note: I agree. Until there's clear feedback, it makes sense to approach this thing a number of different ways. I'm surprised at the number of Fixed Opinions about the Right Way to do Things given the lack of success of White political organizing.
======================================
Subject: Elisha Strom page
hey if Elisha's web page can show White guys with their shirts off, what's
the big deal about White girls with shirts off? ha-
http://www.elishastrom.com/Men/male-form.html
Tim K
Ed. Note: I'm trying real hard to get upset. Yet failing. Oh well. Anger is a gift; it comes only to the elect. I like that "not only do they actually exist" part.
======================================
Subject: Kaminskas
Greetings,
I have written a brief essay highlighting the letter to Police Chief
Kaminskas that I wrote at Dr Pierce's suggestion. The url is:
http://www.michaelcoss.com
Feel free to post it or pass it on.
Michael Coss
======================================
Subject: Newdow is a Jew
Newdow is a Jew. Read last week's Forward -- there's
an article on his Jewishness.
Bill
======================================
Subject: Turkey
hmm, I wonder if the secularist establishment in Turkey can keep control of
the Islamic fundamentalists. If they cant, Israel would lose a regional
military ALLY, yes, Turkey is an Israeli ally, and probably Turkey joining
the EU would become impossible. Hey, both of those would be good results--
go turbans go!
Here.
tim k
======================================
Subject: letter to Baker
Dear Dr./Ms. Baker,
I congratulate you on your independence and moral correctness. I am sure you can find other people who can replace the people who have been fired or resigned. Some of us here in the United States sympathize and applaud your decisions.
Sincerely,
JM
======================================
Subject: Hollywitz video store
======================================
Subject: restaurants
There's an article in the Wall St Journal today about how restaurant chains
are taking over what was once a pretty local industry. tues july 9, 2002.
"Local Restaurants Find BIg Chains Eating their Lunch" It's about a chicago
restauranteur battling with the chains.
Restaurant chains have developed like malls. Located on the bypass, or
strip, or suburban arteries, they suck money out of small towns and medium
sized downtowns. I dont know, but to me they seem like kikified dining.
OK, I confess to liking Outback, and some others, but you get what I mean.
Metzger made the point on his web page that Denny's has actively defamed and
excluded White racists for years now, and recommends readers eat at local
mom-and-pop restaurants. I agree. Take you moeny away from the
multinationals as much as possible whether wall mart or macdonalds, put it
back to your community and into the pocket of self employed Whites to the
fullest extent given appropriate and reasonable standards of quality and
price. Make every day a day you do something to take support away from the
zog-mnc combine, and do something to support local White community life.
Tim K
======================================
Subject: White activist jailed
http://www.telegram.com/news/page_one/racist1.html
======================================
Subject: JULY 13 NA RALLY IN GAINESVILLE, GEORGIA
Article by: ARA Atlanta
Monday 17 Jun 2002
Email: araatlanta@yahoo.com
Summary:ARA will be meeting Thursday to discuss plans
to revitalize the Atlanta chapter, as well as discuss plans to counter
the upcoming Gainesville march planned by the neo-nazi organization
the National Alliance.
Reference at indymedia website:
http://atlanta.indymedia.org:8081//front.php3?article_id=5813
Article:
*Please Forward To Anyone That May Be Interested*
We will be having a meeting this Thursday at 7:30pm in
room 006 of the Little Five Points community center. The meeting will
focus on the upcoming National Alliance march/rally to be held July
13th in Gainesville, Georgia. We will be discussing
organizing strategies for confronting
this neo-nazi organization, one that is possibly the
most active and dangerous in the country. The National Alliance is
gaining a strong foothold in Georgia and has stepped up their activity
over the past couple of months. This will also be the initial meeting of
the Atlanta chapter of Anti-racist Action, so if anyone is
interested in getting involved with ARA please come to the meeting. If you
want to know more about Anti-Racist Action, go to
http://www.coil.com/~ara/What_is_ARA_/what_is_ara_.html
Thanks and we
hope to see everyone there!
======================================
Subject: Economist on Israel
nice link to the freeper/jpost article harping on the Economist magazine for
criticizing izrael. I used to subscribe to the economist and I take it to
be fairly representative of what Anglo-American policy wonks and money men
think, not unlike the CFR pub Foreign Affairs. And, as the freeper article
shows, when they start wandering off the zionist plantation, OI VEY! jewish
alarm bells go off. It was the English lords in cahoots with Jews that
established the bandit state of Izrael as payback for Jew cooperation in the
thirty years preceeding its establishment. When the Anglo-american money
men and "banksters" and start to think Izrael is too damn costly, "Izrael"
will sink like a friggin rock in to the bottom of the ocean. watch out, ITZ
COMING!
Tim K
======================================
Subject: effective political agitation
this link is to an NPR story about HIV/AIDS. I'm citing it only for one
little observation: how ACTUP activists protested the HHS Secretary and
disrupted his speech in Barcelona. Keep in mind these are primarily US
poofters, who have coordinated with their European counterparts to "shout
down" a top US official abroad.
They, like the anarchists and PETA, are examples of effective political
agitation. Look to them for new ideas. Their confrontational tactics have
helped poofters get their pet disease government funding and attention way
disproportionate to the number and significance of victims. The squeaky
wheel gets oiled.
I'm not suggesting WNs start acting like assholes in public, but
confrontational a la what Mr Andrei Kievsky has done, with appropriate dress
and conduct, represents something different for WN and an avenue that should
be pursued further.
http://www.npr.org/news/specials/aids2002/index.html
Tim K
======================================
Subject: violence in Russia
here, NPR audio report on "racial violence in Russia." interview with
"russia's leading skinhead."
Tim K
http://news.npr.org/
======================================
Subject: a simple question
After listening to Free Bird on my car tape player for the 1000th time I turned to radio, NPR to be exact. There was a discussion about middle east . The panel included the host and two fellows, one of them was Ross (his first name escapes me). Later in the show the listeners were invited to call and ask any questions. As always in such shows callers don't really ask questions, they tend to be on one or the other side (pro-Israel or pro-Palestine). But this time a young girl from Iowa called. By the tone of her voice and the general manner of her speaking, she seemed 15 or 16 at most. In a charmingly innocent way she asked, "Why do we always support Israel?". There was no malice and no anger in her voice, just curiosity of young girl. I knew that this question could not be answered It was the "ALWAYS" part of the question that made it impossible for the panelist to answer. Because no one is ALWAYS right. Surely there must have been times that Israel was not right. What made the this simple question difficult for the Israeli apologists to answer was because it was asked by someone who seemed to have no biases one way or the other. It could not be handled in the usual way of dismissing the question by accusing the caller's motivations, or telling him/her that it is there emotional attachment to his cause that somehow skews his/her views.
But not this time. The young caller from Iowa could not be trapped into a category and deprived of the real answer. What were the two panelist to do now? I wish I had the tape recorder. Well these two "expert" stumbled a bit, each hoping the other would say something There were some "Er", "Ah,", and "hum". Finally one of the panelist started to repeat the same old song. Israel is our old Ally, they are the only democracy, and each administration since Truman had always pledged to fully support and back Israel,. She is surrounded by blah blah blah........ and we have moral obligation to see that she is defended and provide her with weapons."
The host chimed, "We also give weapons to Saudis."
Panelist declared, " but Saudi's have to pay for their weapons."
What a joke. Saudis's are not our friend proven by the fact that they have to pay for the weapons we supply them. Israeli's are our friend, they don't have to pay.
At any rate, I don't know whether that young Iowa girl bought all of that crap, or realized the stupidity of theie answer. I wish I could comehow tell her to forget about asking these experts go read the VNN INSTEAD.
Ed. Note: Is there anybody, apart from Jews and professional toad-eaters, who imagines our relationship with Israel is good for us?
======================================
Subject:
VNN,
What follows below is from your website:
Freemasonry: "Secret" Hate Cult, Blight Upon Man:
The masonic religion: As previously stated, freemasonry is a cult. Since the Jewnited States is ruled by this sick cult, we can dismiss any lies about the "secularity" of the government. This has NEVER been the case and the ONE Genuine Man to ever occupy the Hate House, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, was murdered by the jew-masons in Dallas, Texas. Since the Jewnited states is a masonic theocracy, it behooves those of us who wish to understand WHY the government behaves in the criminally insane way that it does, to study the masonic hate cult for what it is.
Why do you guys always do this to yourselves - bring up the JFK assassination to buttress your theory? I don't know about Freemasonry, but I know about the JFK assassination, big time. Lee Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy all by himself for his own twisted reasons.
The Freemasons didn't do it. The CIA didn't do it. The Federal Reserve didn't do it. Nor the Mossad. Nor the Mafia. Nor Castro hit men. Nor Cuban exiles. Nor the Military Industrial Complex. Nor Lyndon Johnson. It was Oswald.
Whenever I read a conspiracy treatise that invites me to believe that this or that group of conspirators not only did the deed at issue, but also killed Kennedy, I tune out.
If the author is so sloppy as to not investigate Dallas, 11/22/63, and all that went before in the years, months, weeks and days in Oswald's life leading up to the event and in the hours after the event, if the author is that sloppy, maybe the rest of his essay is equally without merit.
Regards,
George Josiban
Hamilton, NJ
Ed. Note: No writer speaks for the site, just for himself. I posted the article because it has some interesting facts about Freemasons. This was kind of an in-between article in a technical sense: I intended to post it directly on VNN, but there were so many graphics I decided it was easiest simply to link to it where it stood. I personally don't know who killed Kennedy, and don't overly care. From the little I've read about it, it is quite plausible there was more than one shooter. But as it really doesn't matter to our overall thesis, we mostly avoid the topic. If you consider it ridiculous that Freemasons killed Kennedy, then yes, you should doubt the rest of the article. I don't believe anything that isn't verified, myself. I read something like "Freemasons killed Kennedy," I chuckle to myself, move on. I doubt it personally, but I don't really care that much either. The key to me is that Kennedy illegally bought the election and Dick Nixon -- out of respect for Democracy (the part that makes me laugh all night long) -- refused to demand a recount. As for the rest of the article, as I say, I think there are plenty of thought-provoking facts and points.
======================================
Subject: health care system
Health care system shortages will become an ever increasing sign of strain
on the current complex arrangements.
By way of example, here is an interesting NPR audio report on shortages of
hospital drugs. Why the shortage? They say, just in time inventory
practice motivated by the cost cutting HMOs. True as far as it goes, but
like typical leftist crap stops short of the real issues and implies the
profit motive is to blame. No discussion of the catastrophic costs of
uninsured or underinsured immigrants flooding the hospitals for routine care
they should be getting from primary care physicians, no mention of the
general poor health of illegal immigrants which leads to a higher rate of
utilization of critical care at hospitals. No mention of the racial
factors, of course.
If I were going to summarize the problem in health care provider lingo, I'd
just call it "over-utilization of critical care by non-Whites."
I'm wondering if this problem is supposed to get better as the productive
elements of the population, ie Whites, turn grey and get sicker and produce
less per capita, while the unproductive elements continue to flood the
country and displace the native population.
Let's hope the "outer party elites" wake up and get a clue. The next
person who may get directly impacted by the collapse of the current
arrangements might be themselves. On the other hand, maybe "worse is better
for now."
http://news.npr.org/
Tim K
Ed. Note: Let me just say this straight, because I have a background writing about this stuff. Health care is screwed up ENTIRELY -- and by ENTIRELY I mean EN FUCKING TIRELY -- because of the government. Not private industry. Not HMOs. Not patients. Not insurers. GOVERNMENT IS COMPLETELY, SOLELY and ENTIRELY RESPONSIBLE FOR FUCKING UP HEALTH CARE. Anybody who tells you otherwise is either a dupe or a liar. I will brook no disagreement on this. ... And does anybody get the sickly amusing quality of the federal government talking about Enron and Arthur Andersen and WorldCom? It makes me puke. Like there's a single department of government that isn't 100x more corrupt than any private company in America. Right. Government is a dirty gang. We only have it because people are herd burglars.
======================================
Subject: jews control Polish media
Another Case History of Democracy and Her Freedoms
It is generally acknowledged, by scholars, that Poland's
press --owned chiefly by foreign interests-- is in the Polish language,
but "influenced" by Jewish cultural goals (overall). For
example, Poland's New
York Times is Gazeta Wyborcza. Gaz. Wyb. is controlled by
Adam Michnik. AM,
a former Trotskyite, attended Trotsky International
Congresses. Michnik's
family was a famous Central European communistic entity.
Adam's brother was
a judge who convicted Polish soldiers, having them hung,
after WW II (as
being anti-communist). He now resides in Sweden, under the
name of
Swedowicz. And, you thought the nemesis of mankind only
controlled the
American, Canadian, English and French media? As you learn
more, it gets
more interesting. So, let's move on.
Adam Michnik's father was a member of the Secret Police and
his name was
Shekter. Prof Andrzej Lawrowski, Director of the Instytute
Spolczesnych
Bandan Problemow Kapistelatycznych (Institute of Research on
the Problems of
Capitalism) would often reiterate, in private --as did
large numbers of
scholars-- that post WW II Poland had over a million Jews.
Whatever the
truth is, it is certain that the media in the Polish
language is similar to
that in Hungary, Germany and the United States.
Consequently, those attempting to get elected in Poland,
face the same
problems as those in America; mainly, an image.
[garbled text]
individuals with large followings, such as Bolek
Tejkowski, are
often placed in a psychiatric institute for alleged
anti-semitism and/or
given adverse publicity.
As you read this, today's Polish language media and
politicians are
protesting a candidate in Poland's presidential campaign.
Why? He was
praising Hitler's housing policy and public employment
endeavors. The
comments by once-highly regarded Gen. Tadeusz Wilecki, a
candidate on a
national ticket, "should end his career before it even
begins," said a
spokesman for Poland's ruling Solidarity bloc. Wilecki is
now projected to
receive only one percent of the electorate in the October
vote. Newspapers
mock him.
By the way, Poland's president is a Mr. Kwasniewski. His
father's original
name was Stolzman, according to sources too numerous to
list. Stolzman-Kwasniewski was a hard-core commie. Today he has a
Bush-like TV image. He's a personal friend of Adam Michnik. So much for
the so called democratic process. Could that be one of the reasons why
half the population of some so called democratic countries don't vote... and/or
believe elected politicos?
======================================
Subject: thankz, doc
Title reads:
White couple have black twins through IVF error
http://www.guardian.co.uk/medicine/story/0,11381,751435,00.html
I bet 50 bucks there are at least two Jewish scientists were behind this
charade, and I'm willing to bet that it wasn't a "mistake" -- probably a
deliberate and intentional ploy by "Dr". Jew.
____________
Regarding the IQ discussion (Lynn's quote) I assumed Lynn was referring to
blacks, mestizos as well as Whites when addressing Western civilization
declining IQs, not just White people's IQs are getting lower but the whole
homogeneous pot is. I appreciated the insight about the IQ tests and the
information the writer provided. When I came across the article (quote) my
perception was more the necessity of spiritual awaking of the White conscious
in order for the White race to achieve its (their) potential, not really the
eugenic aspect of sorting out the White race.
Years ago I read some compilations of Jung's writings and works and I
remember reading about the great collective unconscious and how this power
and energy is tapped by certain groups of people to unite them as a whole
through dreams, unconscious thoughts and directives. I'm wondering if this
power can be tapped or understood, by those of Aryan dissent, how much more
powerful the WN movement could be?
Here is a quote from Jung:
"My thesis, then, is as follows: In addition to out immediate consciousness,
which is of a thoroughly personal nature and which we believe to be the only
empirical psyche (even if we tack on the personal unconscious as an
appendix), there exists a second psychic system of a collective, universal,
and impersonal nature which is identical in all individuals [which I would
say it would be race]. This collective unconscious does not develop
individually but IS INHERITED [emphasis mine]. It consists of preexistent
forms, the archetypes, which can only become conscious secondarily and which
give definite form to certain psychic contents."
from The Concept of the Collective Unconscious
This aspect of his work is a fascinating subject to study.
As if an unknown yet hidden 'force' are at work in the people of European
dissent, as more people of Aryan backgrounds "wake up" to the parasite that
lives among us, the more others wake up based upon the inherited unconscious
force in the other awaked Aryan. This may be good news, as if it were a
spiritual spontaneous combustion of sorts, true Aryans would be aroused out
of their enslaved minds more easily than once thought. It seems the inherited
psyche (the collective unconscious) would be a stronger factor for
identification than any indoctrinated program installed onto an Aryan via the
primary conscious. I'm no scholar but would accept any corrections to my
hypothesis above.
Toni
======================================
Subject: televitz -- say no
Warning to all VNN readers,
Do not turn on your TV!!! I made that mistake last Sunday morning. I saw and heard things that made me want to f*cking puke blood. I'll leave it to you to read up on this disgusting group. It hurts me to even think about what I saw. Here are some links:
http://www.icej.org.il/ (read the About Us section first)
http://www.webmb.com/pdfs/news99_col.pdf
Pete
======================================
Subject: SONY
SONY knows how to fight back!
Here.
After being attacked by nigggerFaggotChildMolester Mikey (made-by-the-kikey) JackAsson and that other loud mouth lying faggot hack, Al Sharpton, of being racist and calling JackO(off) a nigger, to exthort big bucks and influence from deep pockets SONY, SONY has fired back fast and hard stating that niggerBoyz real profesional problems stem from his child molesting! WOW! BANG! ZOOM!
Now... if only Republikhanz had the same set of fuckin' balls as the 'Aryans of The East'... the Japaneese!
======================================
Subject: Jew John Frankenheimer
john frankenheimer dead at 72. maybe named after the home of the franks,
but a Frank he was not. NY Times calls him "Resilient Director of Feature
Films and TV movies."
para 15 of article on page A17: "Mr F. was born in New York City on Feb 19,
1930 the son of a storckbroker. 'I came from a half Irish,
half-German-Jewish backround, a very volatile mix' he once said with a
laugh."
Got that? JEW.
a partial list: Birdman of Alcatraz, 62. MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE, 1962.
French Connection II, 1975. Year of the Gun, 1991. Island of Dr Moreau,
97. GEORGE WALLACE, (TNT) 1997. The Path to War, (HBO) 2002.
[did you think they would get a johnny reb to tell the story of geo wallace?
ahhahaha]
Tim K
======================================
Subject: Jews intimidate business
Alex,
Story on the latest Jewish intimidation effort against a business' un-PC thoughts located here:
Here.
Many people have heard the quotes "history is written by the victor" and "everybody loves a winner." Most recognize and agree with the truth-value of these statements. To some, they may not represent the ethical "ideal," but most of reality falls short of those ethical structures anyway. All will agree that these kinds of quotes accurately sum up the human experience, telling us how the world actually operates, warts and all.
It seems the Jews with whom we unfortunately share this planet can't handle the truth, as Jack Nicholson rightly hollered in A Few Good Men. Pacific Coffee, a coffee shop chain in Hong Kong, came under Jewish fire when it ran a quote from the German statesman Adolf Hitler on its "thought-for-the-day-boards." Hitler's quote was basically an amalgam of the two quotes provided in the introductory paragraph of this article, "The victor will never be asked if he told the truth."
The Jewish Community Center and even the Israeli Consulate condemned the coffee shop's quote board. One would think the government of Israel would have better things to do than police the speech of coffee shops in Hong Kong, but then again Israel is not a real State, but merely a base of operations for the collective bloodsucker that is World Jewry.
As usual, the proprietor of the coffee shop, Thomas Neir, published an unwarranted apology in the South China Morning Post. Neir's apology called the Hitler quote "morally offensive and inexcusable." Welcome to the Jew's Earth, 2002, where statements of objective truth are immoral and distasteful. Neir apparently realized his business would be in jeopardy if he didn't grovel before Jewish hypersensitivity, although he must have known the quote was innocuous. At that coffee shop, the best part of wakin' up isn't a Jew in your cup.
======================================
Subject: repamarations
hey alex here's my political plan for "repamarashuns." instead of 40 acres
and a mule, how about, a 40 oz. bottle of malt liquor and a carton of Kools?
and a one way trip to Afrikwa. There's about the only thing I'd be willing
to pay the fedgov more taxes for.
Tim K
======================================
Subject:
I dig the "fuck israel" t shirts. Now thats CHUTZPAH! LOL
tim K
Ed. Note: We put hours of consumer research into that, trying to figure exactly which brief, pithy statement could sum up all that we truly and most deeply feel about that "shitty little country." FI seems to do it.
======================================
Subject: Newdow - Jew or not?
Ha
That's funny you wrote this,
I don't know if this Newdow pressing the lawsuit is a Jew. I suspect he is not.
I've been trying to find out the same thing, off and on when I have some slow time. My suspicions are the opposite of yours, I think he is. Dig the below:
* * * * * *
Michael Newdow + Jew
When we check my traffic stats, Bravenet, which does our counting, shows me from which web sites we're being referred. Over the last two days, we've gotten around 50 visitors from Google, trying to find out if Michael Newdow is Jewish.
I wonder whether you're trying to claim him, with pride, or else trying account for his un-American activities.
So let me just say, I have no idea if Newdow is Jewish. Of his bio, I only know he's an Ivy Leaguer (Brown), a lawyer, and an atheist, and sure, Jews are over-represented in those three fields. But as much as I'd like to call him one of our own (and Bruce Springsteen, for that matter) - or at least confer Honorary Jewishness upon him - I can't speak to his ethnic background.
Maybe Jewhoo will know.
And to those of you asking search engines whether he's gay, I can only say that his wife doesn't seem to think so.
- Mitch Webber, 6:51 PM
Here.
* * * * * *
Tuesday, July 02, 2002
Posted 6:13 PM by Jan Yarnot
Daniel Henninger on the Pledge.
Opinion Journal, last week:
Yesterday's "Special Report With Brit Hume" carried this intriguing report:
Michael Newdow,
THE ATHEIST (That almost always means jew. Can't swear to it in this instance, but almost any name ending in ow is the Germanicised version of the Russian oB [off], and mainly the jews leave the spelling ow when they Anglicise it. In English, among Christians, they almost always turn that ending into ov)
activist who brought the suit challenging the Pledge of Allegiance as unconstitutional, claimed in the suit that he was trying to protect his grade school daughter from being forced to sit and listen while her teachers led other students in the pledge.
Newdow told Fox News that his 8-year-old daughter voluntarily says the pledge along with her classmates. He also said--quote--"this is more about me than her. I'd like to keep her out of this."
Doesn't it make you wish he were your dad?
Newdow turns out to have traversed the country--from the mountains, to the prairies, to the oceans, white with foam--in his effort to to free himself from those oppressive two words. The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reports that Newdow, who at age 45 was living with his parents in Broward County, originally filed suit there, but Judge Ursula Ungaro-Benages threw the case out when she learned he'd moved to California.
Here.
* * * * * *
Anyway, that just goes to show you how many people out there give a damn about who's a jew and who's not, by tracking their web searches. But you know that almost every one of them would get hysterical and adamant about [affecting phony Ted Baxter voice] "If the guy's a jew, I don't care, it doesn't matter to me."
But they DO care. They haven't found the balls yet to admit it in polite company.
THAT'S why I drop your address on as many of these pip squeak sites as I can manage. For the benefit of all those types of punks. They'll secretly look you up, but would never dare mention it to their buddies, ha ha.
Great front page, btw. Keep it up.
K
======================================
Subject: "Minority Report"
I've just seen Minority Report and I have to say that I was pleasantly
surprised - and puzzled.
Consider the casting, which I felt was out the Jewish-ordinary:
For example, the 3 "pre-cogs" (of whom I was immensely proud) were White
prodigies. Instead of 3 whites -- two male twins and a woman -- why didn't
Spielberg cast, say, a couple of black twins, or oriental twins, and a black
woman in these genius roles?
That's what we expect from Jewish Hollywood. After all, it's a basic rule of
thumb in Jewish Hollywood that genius roles are to be reserved for anybody
but White people.
Moreover, the eccentric woman who had masterminded the programme which had
bred the "pre-cogs" was also a normal looking White woman. Again, this
genius role would be an ideal opportunity to present some kind of voodoo
black mama woman on welfare. Again, why didn't he take the opportunity to
cast such?
Was it because he knew that Whites, in these genius roles, were the only
people who would be realistic and acceptable to the viewing audience?
Is Spielberg reading VNN and getting worried? Is he trying to change his
tune? Is Spielberg becoming a Wannabee Last Batcher? I'd like to think so,
but it's probably a little early in the day to say.
Moreover, the non-White count was very low. The speaking black count was
only 2 - that I recall (woman and man in the DC police headquarters,
although some in crowd scenes). There was, however, a very small gook count
found among the police officers, and a gook female in a crowd scene.
Moreover, the 3 grubbiest characters in the film - the black market eye
surgeon, Rufus the night club owner, and the child murderer - were all
greasy, ugly, creepy, sinister jews to look at, although of course not
identified as such, and who contrasted markedly with handsome and dashing
White hero Cruise (who is, albeit, a disgusting liberal in real life).
In addition, the concept of the movie was far too complicated for your
average groid to grasp. In that regard, it's not an inclusive film. You have
to have a basic IQ to even begin to understand it. There's no booty or
rhymes and so I really can't imagine the brothers on the street recommending
it to each other. "Yo, man, check out that muthafugga. It's about
pre-destimaration and shit, no whum sayin'".
To sum up, the world presented to me when I viewed this film, was
overwhelmingly a White world based upon White genius, technology and
heroism. This is not something I normally see when I look at a Jewish
Hollywood film.
I certainly don't recommend putting money into the wallets of Jewish
Hollywood, but as Jewish Hollywood films go, this one is probably among the
best we can expect.
Alistair
======================================
Subject: "Free" Republic
You have an item about FreeRepublic on the current VNN mainboard.....I just noticed recently at FR that all of the e-mail addresses that were [sometimes] shown in a poster's profile are now gone. Cannot find any, at least.
Which figures, because apparently, "evil anti-Semites" were spamming the Zionists at FR on a regular basis. Jimster, in all his freedom-loving and flag-waving, cannot have any of that, ya see....his Jew handlers obviously had a chat with the Nobster...
Alex is right -- there must be a contract somewhere stating that Jews can have the run of FreeRepublic in exchange for the Nobster not having to fork over big bucks in his various lawsuit(s)....
JC
======================================
Subject: Americop
Greetings, Americop Webmaster,
I found you site as a link from another web domain.
http://www.americop.org/Military/aboutamericop.htm
You have a good looking, well organized website (even though many parts are still under construction). Your hearts really appear to be in the right place, too, for the most part.
I'm not sure why you offer such "enduring" support to the unconstitutional "war" now being waged by W. Bush and his gang of jews. I realize that soldiers (and cops) find themselves between a rock and a hard place when their government is controlled by enemy aliens and a tiny, extremely nasty foreign nation, founded by religious bigots and terrorists (that would be Israel). You ask Americans to support "The Coming War." Wouldn't it be better to support a return to honest, Constitutional government? Wouldn't it be better to call for investigations into the what really happened on 09-11-2001?
Patriotism, in the true sense of that word, is a worthy sentiment. If you're not 100 percent sure what the word really means, please look it up and pay attention to the root.
Maybe someone hasn't told you that the old saying, "My Country Right or Wrong," no longer applies when it is not really "My Country." Let's all work to take it back and punish those responsible.
Regards,
Mr. Tsun
P.S. When you refer to a coming war, if you mean nuking Israel, then I'm behind you 100 percent. The jews have ruined, looted, and gutted our once great Nation. Let's not allow them to get away with it!
======================================
Subject: RE: Eirik Rothgar Bloodaxe
This guy must be a fucking moron. Apparently, not only does he not know how to spell, but the not so delicate art of reading is a black art to him. I spent quite a bit of time at heathenfront.org several months ago. Those guys make you and the rest of the VNN staff look like a bunch of philosemitic, nigra-loving, gook worshipping whiggers. The compelling case against white nationalism to be found at heathenfront.org exists only in his febrile scheisskopf. Where are these wondrous manifestos of multicultural Odinism? I couldn't find them. Guess I musta missed them, inconspicuously wedged between the articles calling for holy war on Christianity for inflicting niggers, spics, wogs, and gooks on humans and for being a kosher fabrication complete with dead kike-on-a-stick, other articles speculating on Hitler being a manifestation of the All Father (that would be Woden, Wotan, Odin, etc.), not to mention those editorials spitting venom at the miscegenation mongering charlatans calling themselves Wicca, Antiracist Asatru and other such kosher inanities and warning all real (i.e. race conscious) pagans to give them a wide berth (until the day of the rope, that is). And, oh yeah, their hagiography reads like a Who's Who of the Third Reich.
In conclusion: this guy must be a fucking moron.
PS Did I forget to mention that this guy must be a fucking moron?
PPS Being somewhat absent minded, I may have neglected to remark that this guy must be a fucking moron. If so, please remind your readers that Eirik Rothgar Bloodaxe must be a fucking moron.
======================================
Subject: Pledge
Pam, sorry, but I dont really kare about the Pledge of Allegiance. They can
wipe my arse on the flag for all I care..... Our country has been taken over
by the kikes, as far as I am concerned, since April, 1865. So I am not a
patriot. Let them and the niggers say the pledge. My great great great
grandmother got a dose of the kites in 1864, when Sherman's troops burned her
house down eight miles out of Atlanta, gave her slaves liquor, and raped her
while her man was off at war. As did the German women 80 years later. No
thanks.
======================================
Subject: emigration, godspeed yids
murderous jew criminals dislike the pretense of following their own "religion"
K
Jul. 9, 2002
MK Lapid: I object to all ultra-religious immigrants, not only Americans
By TOVAH LAZAROFF, ALISA ROSE, AND MELISSA RADLER
MK Tommy Lapid of the centrist Shinui Party was not apologetic about his derisive remark concerning ultra-religious immigrants.
Lapid said in a telephone interview from China that he didn't mean to disparage only North American newcomers. He feels the country doesn't need ultra-orthodox immigrants from anywhere.
The uproar began Monday after a weekend article in the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, published as 400 North Americans prepared to become largest bloc of immigrants from the continent ever to immigrate to Israel. They arrived on an El Al jet on Tuesday.
Lapid was quoted as saying that "part of the problem is the character of the immigration from the United States: it's more Orthodox.
"We get very little support from the Conservative or Reform Jewish communities in the United States. So what you end up with is a mushrooming native population of ultra-religious, followed by a migration of religious North American Jews who, quite frankly, we could do without."
Lapid told The Jerusalem Post Monday night that he did not attack North American immigrants in general, only "ultra-religious immigrants" no matter what country they come from.
"I honestly do not remember this interview, but I do not deny it, because I give so many interviews," Lapid said. But the statement about Americans, he said, "is a slip on the part of the journalist."
The journalist mistakenly used the word religious when he should have said ultra-religious, Lapid said.
However he is prepared any time, anywhere to state that "we can do without ultra-Orthodox Jews who do not recognize the Zionist state, do not join the army, and do not contribute a thing to Israel.
"I have to make it crystal clear that this is neither about religious or Orthodox Jews or North Americans. I am not against the immigration of any type by Jews, I only think that ultra-Orthodox Jews do not contribute to this country," Lapid said.
Deputy Absorption Minister Yuli Edelstein (Yisrael Ba'aliya) called Lapid's remarks to the Florida newspaper outrageous.
"I despise the comment as much as I can," Edelstein said.
Josie Arbel, director of the Association of Americans and Canadians in Israel (AACI), took exception to another aspect of Lapid's remark: The inference that many North American immigrants are religious.
"It saddened me that the old stereotype that North American immigrants are all religious and not the kind of people you want is still around," Arbel said.
Arbel said a survey done in 1998 of North Americans showed they represented a cross-section of groups, religious and non-religious alike.
Here.
======================================
Subject: turds running the shithouse
Put mexes in charge of the border and issuing work cards to mexes -- makes sense
K
2 INS workers admit work-cards scheme
By Marisa Taylor
STAFF WRITER
July 9, 2002
Two INS employees pleaded guilty yesterday to charges of helping illegal immigrants get employment authorization cards.
Ruben Marquez, an Immigration and Naturalization Service clerk in the downtown San Diego federal building, admitted in federal court that he issued the cards.
Roberto Barajas, another INS clerk, said he used his badge to wave the immigrants through security.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Anne Perry said Marquez issued at least 100 cards to illegal immigrants who paid between $3,000 and $4,000 a card. The cards, which allow foreigners to work in the United States, normally cost $100.
Federal authorities arrested the pair after Marquez issued a card to an undercover agent, who gave him $1,500 as partial payment.
Agents found immigration documents at Marquez's house; INS employees aren't allowed to take such documents home, officials said.
Marquez began working for the agency in March 2001. His main duties were to assemble the employment authorization cards. It was not his job to decide whether to grant the cards to immigrants.
A Chula Vista man, Jeovanny Pascano, 35, also pleaded guilty in the case yesterday, saying he helped escort the immigrants into the federal building. Pascano did not work for the INS.
At their sentencing hearing Sept. 30, the three men face up to five years in prison.
http://www.uniontrib.com/news/uniontrib/tue/metro/news_1m9ins.html
======================================
Subject: Imvasion
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-sobhani070902.asp
republicans beginning to become concerned bout immigration . . .
K
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|