10/25/00
I have so far enjoyed the series of writings
comprising "Blackout" - but I must take issue with one
of the ideas expressed in part 6. The author states
that the Jews are the best in the world when it comes
to writing and directing, etc. in the film industry.
Not so. I work in the film industry, so I know
better. Citing the fall of German cinema after the
Jews left is not a good example - the Germans didn't
have the time to build a cadre of talent, and believe
me, it takes time. The same would not be true in
this country. We have thousands of capable whites,
but of course, not being Jewish, or not knowing
someone already in the industry, will keep them from
making it. If you look at the Hollywood trade
regarding money making potential, etc. when it comes
to directors, there are only two Jews in the top 10
(of course Spielberg is the top Jew). Yet 90% of
feature film directors are Jews. People like James
Cameron and Martin Scorcese are lucky to have gotten a
break. I bring this up because I see daily what
happens to the non-Jews in the industry. The top
writers in terms of creativity and output are almost
all non-Jews, but the limelight and credit is usually
reserved for the Chosen. Once this group of
charlatans is run out of this country and this
industry, the film industry will live up to its
potential. (I work as a script reader - so I know
exactly what's going on.) Of course, please don't
publish my name, or the thought police will have me
looking for a new job. Keep up the good work.
[anonymous]
10/21/00
Re: the term "Semitically correct"
Your writers use the term "Semitically correct" when talking about the Jews. However,
"Semitic" means "of or relating to the Semites or their languages or cultures"
(American Heritage Dictionary).
"Semites" includes Arabs, Syrians, Mesopotamians and Phoenicians/Palestinians
as well as Arameans/Hebrews.
It is unjust for you to drag these peoples other than Jews into the context when you are
talking about Jews only. Have not these other Semites been, after all, among the chief
recipients of the tender mercies of the Jews?
Your terminology is confusing and misleading and it should be changed.
May I suggest a better usage? Try "Talmudically correct". This identifies not only the
people involved, but the thought system they live by.
sincerely, michael humphrey
Editor's reply: Your facts are correct and your points are well
taken. However, reality is that there is the law of the dictionary, and there is the law
of usage, and the latter is stronger. (You may be familiar with the old adage, 'There is
no law, save usage.') The world identifies Semite with Jew, and, as irritating and even
unjust as our terminology may be to Arabs and sticklers, we choose to leave that particular
semantic battle to others. Note that Joseph Sobran was the first to use the term
'Semitically Correct,' (as far as we know), and we are merely following him. It is the
Jewish nature of the Political Correctness that is all important, and what we wish to
emphasize by altering it, subtly, to Semitically. The sound echoes the sense better than
with any other term. A.L.
10/17/00
Any reasonable person is bound to acknowledge that the Palestinians
enjoy full human rights, the same as any normal people. It is simply
their misfortune to be in conflict with the Israelis, who enjoy Jewish
rights, which, indisputably, supersede mere normal human ones.
Nothing can be done to change that very real fact, as real as the
Holocaust. We Western intellectuals and the Palestinians (especially the
Palestinians, in effect) just have to live with it, unless we care to
end up being associated with the lunatic fringe, e.g. "revisionist"
crackpots and such.
I for one don't see what all the fuss is about.
N
Editor's Reply:There is nothing inevitable about the
Palestinians' situation in "Israel." Were this rogue state not propped up
by the United States (i.e., the U.S. taxpayer, i.e., the White
American who has been indoctrinated in Holocaustianity for an entire generation now),
to the tune of roughly 3 billion dollars annually as an outright cash gift--not
a loan--in addition to innumerable forms of indirect aid, the Israeli tail which wags
the American dog would have its back to the wall and quickly succumb to its many enemies
in the Middle East. It's only through the presence and influence of highly-placed
Jews in the Propasphere--the seamless and total environment of propaganda which
bathes our public life in Semitical Correctness in the same way the ocean of air all about us
forms an invisible but omnipresent environent--that the Jewish State was created and sustained.
In other words, "Israel" is a parasitical state which mirrors the history of its people.
To call Revisionism a "lunatic fringe" is to accept at face value a body of claims which contradict
forensic evidence, common sense, and (in many of its main assertions) the laws of physics.
The interesting thing about the constantly maligned Revisionists, is that almost all of them
began as "Holocaust" believers --in many cases believers who were anticipating an easy
disproof of the Revisonist position, but with enough integrity to follow where the truth led.
One of our human weaknesses upon which the Jews and their allies most rely, is the reluctance of the
great majority of people to court disapproval by others. And of course phrases such as "lunatic fringe"
are used to frighten people away from even considering the validity or evidence of the position/s
associated with them. R.B.
10/13/00
I think you have a terrific website... highly informative, especially for people who
already understand what is going on in the world. You keep it current, that's its most
valuable aspect. I'm coming to rely on it more and more.
Thanks for all the work that must go into this project.
Sincerely,
Gordon Ipock
Morgonton, NC
10/3/00
Thanks for posting that article about that ego-maniacal Hebe hemorrhoid
sissy Thomas Friedman. This from a fellow tribesman of his.
[anonymous]
09/19/2000
How ironic that so many in the men's movement use the derogatory term
"feminazi" to describe feminists when the Third Reich was one of the few
modern societies to put women in their proper place! Never mind the fact
that the field marshals of modern feminism have been mostly Jewesses: Abzug,
Steinem, Freidan, Allred, Dworkin, Robin Morgan, and Naomi Wolfe. Never mind
that the ultimate gender equality society was the Soviet Union, creation of
the Jewish Bolsheviks who overthrew the Christian Patriarchy of Czarist
Russia. Never mind that feminism has been merely one of the many cudgels
with which the Chosen bludgeon us, their arch-enemy, the Straight White
Gentile Male. Never mind history, never mind facts. Just pander to popular
prejudice and Semitically-correct, Hollywood-approved propaganda terms. Of
course, your billboard is in Hollywood, or close to it. I know how long it
would stay up if you used it to really tell the truth about feminism. Do
you?
Neither Left nor Right, Just Pro-White!
Gregory Krupey
PS: GUN CONTROL IS GOY CONTROL!
9/17/00
Sir: I just wanted to make a point you might find interesting. In the book of Revelation
3:9 Christ talks about "them of the synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are
not, but do lie...". Are the Jews whom you accuse really Jews at all? I say no. I think
they are really a race of impostors known as the Kenites (son's of Cain) who masquerade as
Jews. They do not follow Mosaic law but a book known as the Talmud. Lenin, Trotsky, etc.
were not part-Jewish, necessarily, but part-Kenite. Cain was the first murderer; and what
do these people do?...commit wholesale murder. And who do they spend most of their time
murdering?...white-Christians! They have done it throughout recorded history but their
judgement is coming: "For my sword shall be bathed in heaven: behold, it shall come down
upon Idumea, and UPON THE PEOPLE OF MY CURSE, to judgement." Isaiah 34:5. The curse
referred to is when Cain was cursed from the ground. Cain and his descendents can't do too
much honest labor, they have to lie, steal, cheat and charge high interest rates! My point
is that God knows who the real offenders are: the Kenites, not Torah (Lawful) Jews.
Editor's Reply:
The attempt to apply Biblical categories to today's reality seems to me counterproductive.
DNA studies have shown Jews are much more closely related to one another than to their
host populations. That is an established fact. A second fact is that the people who call
themselves Jews -- Steinem, Boxer, Schumer, Dershowitz, Glasser -- are intent on White
genocide. What more do we need to know? As for who the true Jews are, well, I'm content
to let God sort that out. But I'm not holding my breath. A.L.
9/12/00
Great whup-ass site! I know you hear it all the time but let me add my
1 1/2 cents: Most excellent site! I've been checking in for the last few
weeks, got the link off civilwartwo, and I've just been wanting to tell
you that for awhile.
Hey, have you been to this site?
http://www.faem.com/
I think the webmaster and an active writer on his site should be allowed
guest submissions, or otherwise connect as it would be great to hear
more unified voices!
Wishing you great sucess,
Eddie T.
San Francisco
Editor's Reply: Thanks. Anyone is welcome to submit articles
or story links. A.L.
9/07/00
Editor:
Keep blasting the Jews -- I love it and God knows they deserve it! I just discovered your
site, and I think it's great. There are many other good nationalist sites out there but they seldom update, so
I'll keep checking back.
M. Collins
Des Plaines, Ill.
Nice site. The news and reviews are great, I wish you had more of them. Do you accept
submissions?
Jean Joyner
St. Louis
Editor's Reply: Yes, we do. If you share our political outlook and
want to contribute up a book or movie review or an article about local happenings, we will
publish it here if we find it worthy. Also, don't hesitate to forward links to local news
stories VNN ought to know about. A.L.
Ed.: Just a brief note to tell you I like VNN. I'm sure you have a lot of hate mail, but
the story selection and spin are much needed. I can tell you somewhat try to group your
stories, but it would be nice if you could archive them by country/issue instead of by
date. Thanks and good luck,
Ed Johnson
Salt Lake City
Editor's reply: We're working on it. We continue to expand and
improve, and welcome suggestions. A.L.
9/6/00
Editor:
I just wanted to write to tell you how much I absolutely love VNN. The conversation
with David Horowitz is priceless. I've never heard of this Halliday fellow before, but his
piece reminded me of Swift's Modest Proposal -- except that Halliday's Conversation
is actually funny. The idea that black skin is the result of environment rather than
heredity is a perfect reductio ad absurdum, as he says, of the last hundred years of
dogmatic "nurture-ism" the academic Jews have shoved down our throats. Get Halliday to
write more, will you? Now that P.J. O'Rourke's gone into semi-retirement, we need a new
right-wing humorist. And especially one that doesn't give in on race. Once again, love
the site and best of luck to you.
Michael Kavannagh
Baton Rouge
Editor:
I just found your site the other day, and have been coming back every time online since.
I most enjoy the German coverage. You can't find much of that in English anyway, but what
I really like is the pro-German perspective. With luck one day a restored sense of German
nationlism will bring political change... Anyway, good luck, and know that you have at
least one devoted reader...
G. Storcker
Chicago
9/4/00
VNN: You suck. "No Jews, just right." That's real clever. Were you eating at the
Outback when you thought that up? Just like everything else at VNN, it's ripped off.
You hate Jews so much, why do you take most of your stories off Jewish wires? If you
didn't use stories that Jews actually did the legwork to get out there and report, you
wouldn't have anything to criticize. You show the same gracelessness and ungratefulness
you accuse everybody else of. Christ, I'm surprised you didn't blame that shark attack on
the Jews! Maybe you ought to check out its latin name: maybe it's real name is sharkus
sharkensteinem or something. The fact is, your soi disant band of disaffected writers are
a bunch of scared little boys (and girls) who can't deal with a changing world. Bad
luck,
N. Shapiro
New Jersey
I don't know how I came across this site, but I thought stuff like this was gone for good.
A few pix and graphics wouldn't hurt. Keep covering the Tacoma/Seattle attacks. Although
people in the East might not associate the Northwest with minority violence, we have it
here all right. But like everywhere else, interracial crime's only played up when the
attacker is white.
Mike Belson
Tacoma
9/2/00
Nice site. I really enjoyed Blackout, and look forward to the next installment.
It's unusual to see a news site that criticizes Jews. Keep it up,
James Miller
Beaumont, Texas
Editor: I came across your site from Civil War Two. The articles are about 80%
what I would pick out of the paper to read myself. And the more original stuff you can do
the better. Net sites seem split between PC sites and non-PC sites that might as well be,
so it's refreshing to see something truly "diverse."
J. Holcomb
Atlanta
Editor -- I'm really impressed. A bunch of "disgusted and disaffected" writers making your
heroic way in the world by taking on...Jews. You say you defend civilization, but you rip
to shreds the one people that has advanced that cause more than any other. Did you ever
think that without the Jews you resent so much, you'd have no Pap smear, no theoretical
physics, no psychiatry, no polio cure? Half of you probably wouldn't even be alive except
for Jewish medicine. You posture as heroes, but you smell like whiny losers to me.
D. Rosen
Bryn Mawr
Editor's reply: The one people that has "advanced that cause more
than any other"? Where? In Israel? I think you have civilization confused with
parasitism... No Marx, no Freud, no Jesus, no Dershowitz, no Feinstein, no Albright, no
Schumer, no Steinem, no Boxer. I'll risk polio for that any day. A.L.
Sir:
If the "liberal establishment" mentioned in your August 28th piece, "White on Black" is
indeed "fictitious", then may I presume that you and the Guardian do not really
exist? Should I regard the governments of your Mr. Blair and my Mr. Clinton as merely
shared mass hallucinations brought on by the ingestion of some tainted beef, the product of
mad cow disease, perhaps? Is it all perhaps yet another foul plot concocted by that
sinister vast right-wing conspiracy (nothink ficktissus 'bout that lot, eh, mate?) to
delude Angry White Males like myself that we are being oppressed by non-existent yet
benevolent womyn, blacks, and Jews (not to mention supremely-compassionate,
highly-enlightened, all-around smart white gentile liberal blokes like yourself) so that we
will oppress them even more severely in our manipulated backlash? You better pause and
take a deep breath, mate: when you start to believe your own propaganda, you're in trouble.
Of course, in your position, you bloody well better believe it, eh wot?
Remember the Alamo! Remember Rorke's Drift!
Gregory J. Krupey
09/01/2000
Dear Editor:
Cindy Rodriguez's story on the decline of the White birth rate in Boston is yet another
reminder that the race which embraces the degenerate ideology of feminism is digging its
own grave. Black and Latino women do not put career above childbirth, and the chauvinist
cultures into which they are born ensure that they don't get the opportunity. Meanwhile
Whitey, emasculated by a whole posse of feminist shrews (teachers, mothers, wives, sisters,
girlfriends, and seemingly every female professional bigmouth on TV) and bamboozled by his
tawdry American popular culture to value everything but the furtherance of his own kind,
counts himself lucky to have an extra paycheck every week and the chance to get laid every
other one. If the White race is once again to flourish, the damage inflicted by feminism
must be reversed. Repeal the 19th Amendment and send the ladies packing from the barracks
and the executive suites and back to the kitchens and nurseries! Either feminism dies, or
we do.
Gregory J. Krupey
08/27/2000
Gentlemen:
VNN is an excellent site. I can give you no higher praise than I bookmarked it after the
first visit. You are entirely correct that our only salvation is in breaking the back of
Jewish power in this country: every other problem flows from it or is exacerbated by it.
This was a long hard struggle to the truth for me, as a former liberal and believer in
Jewish "innocence". All that meant was that I was merely media-indoctrinated from an early
age. You are also correct that there can be no compromising on this matter, and those who do
so are doomed to suffer the same fates allotted to the John Birch Society, the Republican
Party, and the conservative "movement" after Jewish infiltrators derailed all those
potential adversaries. Controlled opposition now runs to the pro-gun movement, thanks to
the work of the Trojan Horse Jews for Preservation of Firearms Ownership. All the ball cap
and beer belly patriot types are now running around spouting the leftist rhetoric of
victimization and even wearing yellow stars (as in your story), ranting about the first
thing Hitler did when taking power (outlawing guns, of course), and generally being
hypnotized from realizing that GUN CONTROL IS GOY CONTROL, STUPID!
But it seems as if the Chosen are now turning their attention to the last bastion of
White resistance, the one where no one thought they would ever dare go, the racialist
movement itself. Anyone who attended the last American Renaissance conference and had to
endure Robert Weissberg's condescending speech on the true relationship between blacks and
Jews knows what I mean. Weissberg owned up, in so many words, that Black Power was a Jewish
production, but once the Frankenstein's monster (or would that be Golem?) got out of control
and turned on its master, some Jews apparently started having some of those famous Second
Thoughts about the desirability of the ghettoization of American life. Weissberg admitted
that Jews will never worry about blacks trying to pull off a "final solution" because
they're just frankly too stupid. (Then why all the fuss over Farrakhan?) He then went on
to posit a White-Jewish alliance against blacks and other Third World invaders, but with
the caveat that "anti-Semitism" had to be removed from the movement. He didn't elaborate
on what that entailed precisely, but I would wager that any criticism of anyone or anything
Jewish, or what in many cases is simply telling the unvarnished truth, would be deemed
"anti-Semitic". There was no mention of any reciprocal move on the Jew's part, such as
having their kinsman in academia, publishing, and the entertainment industries call a
moratorium on the ever-flowing stream of anti-White propaganda that bombards us daily,
but that is not surprising.
One last note: you might want to add the name of Jim Quinn to your list of
conservative/libertarian cowards. He has a Limbaugh/Stern-like morning talk show on
a Pittsburgh radio station, also broadcast on the net. His following extends nationwide.
I have been waiting for five years for him to get a clue regarding the kosher, but he
seems to slide ever deeper in worship of the Chosen on a daily basis.
Greg Krupey
Thanks, Greg. I think your observations are correct. I was never a liberal myself, but
even as a conservative, I had to get past the anti-historical, colorblind individualist
dogma today's faux conservatives preach to see the bigger picture. It took many years and
living in a couple big cities to finally press the lessons home. There's no getting
through to the highly perceptive, as P.J. O'Rourke once observed! It is our belief
at VNN that there is a large body of Whites and particularly White males that is
primed to follow the same path you and I did as the country discolors toward White
plurality over the next twenty-thirty years. In purely political terms it all boils
down to, There is No Way Out But Through the Jews. Any movement they are allowed into,
including racialism, they will in time dominate. That's the story of conservatism itself,
let alone subsets like the 2nd Amendment defenders. The sooner the Southerners, the
gun people, the Semitically Correct racialists and conservatives realize this, the
better. Seeking to maintain respectability is playing a fixed game as though it were
legitimate. It means chasing an ever leftward-moving line; defending a shrinking
perimeter. Back in the fifties, William F. Buckley was saying exactly the things we
racialists are today. But today's National Review hires Mexicans and Indians who
denounce even non-racialists like Pat Buchanan for their pretend defense of the White
majority. The secret to success is to name the enemy and attack him. The cowards and
remonstrators and maintainers of respectability find no home here at VNN and
never will. Only the fighters.
A.L.
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|