|
05/05/01
Subject: Rattlesnake shooting
Mr Copp -
"Now, back to shooting rattlesnakes in your cellar with buckshot-loaded .22 rifles
(laugh)."
The above statement by "Brian Copp" is symptomatic of the generalized dumbassiness of
neo-socialists with regards to general firearms knowledge.
I would challenge Mr Copp to manage stuffing one piece of "buckshot" into a .22 caliber
cartridge, or even into the barrel of a .22 caliber rifle for that matter, with a blank
charge in the chamber. If he SHOULD manage to accomplish that feat, I would then ask him
to follow through and FIRE that weapon/cartridge.
Now, back to inventing tortuous excuses for your pet nigger savages as they continue along
their path of perpetual ignorance and self-induced failure (laugh).
Regards
Mark Konrad
PS For Mr Copp's edification - buckshot diameter and weight chart below. No point in
wasting an opportunity to learn something BC, I'm sure you'll agree. Best, Mark
Buckshot Chart
Buckshot
--------------------Weight in----No. in-------------
size---Diameter------grains------one ounce----------
OOO-----.36-----------72.9---------6----------------
O0------.33-----------53.8---------8----------------
O-------.32-----------48.2---------9----------------
1-------.30-----------40.0--------10----------------
2-------.27-----------29.4--------15----------------
3-------.25-----------23.3--------18----------------
4-------.24-----------20.5--------21----------------
05/05/01
Subject: Why...
Is there like something I did to you. I don't know you and yet you
talk as if you do. Why is there ignorence in this world. It is ignorent to
think what you think. We all bleed red, but you cannot see that. I have
never done anything racial to anyone I look at everyone equally, god made no
one higher or lower than anyone else. I would understand if you just didn't
like one person but everyone. No I am not saying that I am some big
Christian, but I do believe in God and so should you. I have done things
that no one else could amagine, but while I was doing it I was never racial
about things. Can you not go to church or ask someone for help? What if you
were dying and some white guy saved you would you be mad at him for trying to
save your life? I hope not, because he could have let you die. I mean think,
you may not like what I am saying and you may have already deleated this
message but I love everyone black, whote, green, yellow, purple. And so
should you.
05/04/01
Subject: 1964 Civil Rights Killings- What The Media Didn't Tell You
This famous case (below) was just mentioned in our local paper, The Arizona
Daily Star. In fact, this item comes from their web site.
The truth about the below-mentioned civil-rights case is as follows, and we
have legit sources to prove it:
Out of the 3 "civil-rights workers" killed, 1 was Black, 2 were Jewish
Marxists. The Jewish Goodman boy's father was a bigshot with the Marxist
radio network Pacifica. Both Goodman and Schwerner had numerous ties to
extreme-left, Marxist groups, and all of this is mentioned in 1) a book about
the heavily-Marxist "civil-rights" movement that CPTWC owns, titled "We Are
Not Afraid," 1989, by Seth Cagin and Philip Dray, Bantam Books; 2) an
official Pacifica timeline, found 7/12/99 on their web site, and printed by
CPTWC:
http://www.pacifica.org/about/history/high.html
(only they had the date wrong- 1962 instead of 1964).
The conservative people in the South knew that these "civil-rights workers"
flooding into the South in the early 1960s were 1) largely Marxist; 2)
largely Jewish Marxists; 3) trained by Northern left-wing radicals, including
Pacifica, to register BLACKS (TO VOTE) AS DEMOCRATS ONLY, THUS CHANGING THE
VOTING SPECTRUM OF THE ENTIRE SOUTH.
In short, they were using the hapless, uneducated Blacks to gain political
power. (Notice that this movement to register Blacks to vote was NOT led, or
started, by Blacks, nor did it originate in the South).
Further, they were warned numerous times to stop their blatantly subversive
activities, yet they continued. In short, these
Marxists-posing-as-innocent-pacifists really have no one to blame but
themselves for the violence that they met.
Tucson, Arizona Thursday, 3 May 2001
http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/10503Talk2fCivil.html
05/04/01
Subject: "White Holidays"
Talk about a "meeting of the minds"! I was reading the VNN article on "White Holidays" and
had just gotten to the part where the writer mentioned the need for the kind of white
holidays which would relate to the high points of our European history and Aryan character,
rather than the usual (Christian) religious holidays available to us at present, or to
some of our wonderful but too narrowly specific ethnic sub-groups. I reflected for a moment
to see whether I could think of some event/s in our history which would fill the bill...
Thermopylae immediately occurred to me -- I recall reading a really good fictional treatment
of it ("Gates of Fire") which I found and bought via VNN's "store" page -- and when I looked
to see what holiday/s Rienzi would suggest, I enjoyed that all-too-rare sensation in these
days of diversityland, of being among those like myself...
Keep up the good work!
Fred
Ed. Note: We need a date for these holidays. We can
create our own culture. Christmas only exists if we observe it. Same thing with
Thermopylae Day.
05/04/01
Subject: Interesting story about Joe Feagin
Note: the main part about Joe ties in at the end.
I went to University of Florida, and took a sociology class from Dorathea
Hawthorne-Burdine, who was a "pet" of Joe Feagin's. As a matter-of-fact, Dr.
Feagin was on her doctoral disseration review commitee. They were together
quite a bit. Anyway this bitch idolized Dr. Feagin. She was a militant black,
by the way. That nut would quote ridiculous statistics, like "75 percent of
white people belong to hate groups," that she claimed were facts supported by
Dr. Feagin. This bitch was truly insane, and would go into tirades about how
billards were racist because to win you have to knock the black ball in last,
and EKG machines were racist because the black lead was on the left side and
left was sinister in Latin, and other shit equally kooky.
So this sociology class consisted of 4 exams, 1 of which we could drop, and 4
essays, one of which we could throw away as long as the remaining three,
equaled or exceeded 3000 words total, in order to meet the Gordon-rule
requirments of Florida state-funded educational institutions, and of course,
her daily "lecture" on "whitey". It's worth noting here that I have a
near-perfect GPA at this point, with only one B marring my academic record
after 2 1/2 years. We have our first test, which is multiple choice, and I
practically ace it, even thought it is full of obvious lies. Then our first
report is due and we were to research and write about the state of racial
equality. We were to do this by polling 100 random people and asking them
questions that were were allowed to make up ourselves.
I ask standard questions like, "Do you feel that you have the same
opportunities at (work, school, dating) as people of (black, white, whatever)
race?". The results were what I expected, most of the whites and asians said
that the blacks had it easy, and most of the blacks said the the whites made it
too hard for them. A few whites said that they could never have it as hard as
blacks, and a few blacks said that life was pretty easy for them these days. So
I write the report and turn it in. Next class, I get it back and almost shit my
pants. She gave me the equivalent of a D+!
I start to panic, and after class located someone who made an A.
Coincidentally, this was a black girl. I read her paper and couldn't believe my
fucking eyes. That paper all but ass-raped the scientific method. Seventy-five
percent of the people she questioned were black, and said that the white man
was keeping them down. Ten percent was white and almost all of them said that
they hated that they were prejudice and blacks don't have anything approching
equality. I mean I know a lot of white people and I cannot imagine this shit
coming out of any but the most hard-core, hippy, whigger mother-fucker
possible.
So I take the hint and start planning my next writing assignment, which is to
be about any American sociological event, and its impact on modern American
society. I know I'll have to pander to her anti-whiteness in order to pass, at
least that was my theory, and I was going to put it to the test. If it
backfired, I still had time to drop the class and retake it the following
semester with another teacher. I decide to write about the native american
indians, and how "whitey" not only fucked them out of house and home, but
spread disease like he was trying to win a prize. I stayed away from the
subject of blacks, but did somehow tie it in to modern American men and their
objectification of women. I filled that paper so full of conjecture, subjective
opinions, any other hot-button topic I could think of, that my tenth-grade
history teacher would have had a fucking seizure on the spot if she could have
seen it.
I turn the paper in. Next class I get it back and almost shit my pants again.
This time she had given me an A+! She wrote and circled "Excellent Work" at the
top of the page, and wrote little notes, like "true" and "amen" all throughout
my paper. She eve had me read the first two paragraphs out loud for the class!
The next writing assignment is more of the same. I feed her a heaping-helping
of politically-correct bullshit, and she gives me an A. It was really a much
better arrangement than suffering through learning and real sociology. In the
end I am the only person in the whole class that makes an A. Ironically, the
only 3 blacks in the class, all make C's and lower and take out official
greviances against her for reverse-discrimination!
I was on the student activities board and happened to be at a luncheon a couple
of months later, with her and Joe Feagin. They were setting together and when I
walked past, she recognized me and introduced me to Dr. Feagin; Something along
the lines of "This is one of the best students I've ever had." To which he
replied that she was one of his best, and he was sure I'd learned alot from
her. I went back to table and sat staring at them. I tried to rationalize how
these two intelligent people could believe even a fraction of the bullshit they
expoused.
I finished school, and basically forgot about them, expect when I learned that
Dorathea had been dismissed for shoving and yelling racial epithets to a
wheelchair-bound white girl. That is, until about two years ago. It turns out
that Dorathea, is form the town that I used to live in before I moved here. I
ran into her and some black-panther-looking motherfucker one day at walmart.
She recognized me and started to come over. Her black-panther-looking friend
seemed a little leary however, untill she told him "It's cool he's ok." All at
once I thought I was going to vomit. I took what she said to mean what it was
supposed to, "It ok, he knows his place." I felt ill for several days, thinking
of how I had played to her and let her think I believed the shit I wrote.
In the end, Feagin was right. I did learn alot from her. A lot about how young
students, the first-rate citizens of tomorrow, are cowed into believing or at
least going along with, ideas that are absurd. A lot about how society rejects,
even punishes, truth, even scientific truth, if it goes against popular
thought. And most of all, alot about myself, and how I wished now that I could
have written the truth, even if it meant an F.
Ed. Note: Interesting story. When standards are dropped
in one area, they tend to be dropped in every area. If you let unqualified nigs into med
school, why not artificially inflate their grades, too? I took an African history course
in college from a doctrinaire Marxist. He gave me a lower grade than I deserved. He did
the same thing to a black African acquaintance. The guy had come over from Nigeria, if I
recall, full of respect for the White man and the West (most Africans, unlike our domestic
niggers, lack that chip-on-the-shoulder mentality), wanting to learn our secrets, and this
was the sort of teaching he ended up with. Tragic ironies multiply, these
days.
05/04/01
Subject: Copp
[W]hat is the point of providing Brian Copp, that vacuous blowhard,
the Marxist "who hates Communism," with a sustained forum? It's not as though he's a
Thinker. He can't even acknowledge reality; after repeated explanations, he's still
addressing White Nationalists as "conservatives." He's not reachable.
He has "made himself right to home" here to endlessly snipe and
toss mud. "Now, back to shooting rattlesnakes in your cellar with buckshot-loaded .22
rifles (laugh)." You left out "while drinking moonshine from a jug," Brian. These endless
Homer-and-Jethro rural-Whites-living-in-chicken-coops hallucinations, the standard crude
smear, even after he's been repeatedly told that many of VNN's writers are urban-dwelling
intellectuals with no cellars and no snakes. Doesn't know a thing about guns, either. What
Democrat does?
A Gore supporter, accusing US of being "tools of the Jews?"
Why this mindless pollution, this kike-spit in our living room? Let's stop the hate.
-a VNN reader
Ed. Note: It's always good to have someone around to kick
in the ass. Posting Herr Copp's letters is a small price to pay for the hours of amusement
he provides. The poor guy has to run around all day in the park peddling Daily Workers,
have pity on him. Imagine how frustrated he must be. Printing his letters is the least we
can do. We merely provide the coloring boook, why he chooses to color the sky green, I
can't tell you. Kids are like that. Maybe one day he'll wake up, escape the tethers of
the fleabitten rabbi. His wrong letters help us understand how right we are, by contrast.
We have plenty of space, and our writers can strike back if they choose. If Angry White
Female wants to respond to the rattlesnake gibe, she's more than welcome. We at VNN
are making our own culture, we are being the culture we want, and that means no censoring,
smearing or whining. Jews and the rabble sue and cry. Civilized men laugh and overcome.
By the way, I have it on inside information that Angry White Female drinks her moonshine
out of mason jars, not jugs, like all classy folk.
05/04/01
A con flees from pro-Whites...
Subject: Hal Turner
The Hal Turner Radio Show
Bringing American-Style talk-radio to 50 Countries around the world
IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
As a talk radio Host, Hal Turner is considered a "public Figure" under the Law. This means
that Mr. Turner is subject to public criticism, commentary and being talked about; over
which Mr. Turner has no legal control and no legal recourse. One such situation involves
Mr. Turner being mentioned on Web Sites owned by others.
It has come to the attention of Mr. Turner, his radio show staff, The Omega Radio Network
and radio station WBCQ that "The Hal Turner Radio Show" is being actively mentioned and
even promoted on web sites operated by a number of groups. Some of these groups espouse
virulent views.
Despite repeated requests to have mention of Mr. Turner deleted from such web sites, the
site operators have refused. They have responded that Mr. Turner is a "public figure" and
as such, they are free to speak about him.
This being the case, Mr. Turner feels it necessary to - and hereby does - publicly
DISCLAIM AND REPUDIATE any connection to, affiliation with or support of such groups. Their
mention of Mr. Turner and his radio program on their web sites is being done without
permission and despite repeated requests for removal.
The Hal Turner Radio Show is - and will continue to be - a forum for people to freely
express their opinions on a variety of topics. It is important to understand that allowing
the free expression of ideas and opinions does NOT constitute actual or tacit approval
of such views by Hal Turner, his radio show, The Omega Radio Network or radio station W
BCQ. Thank you.
Grant Breuer's comments
From 5/3 Hal Turner Update: Thanks to so many of you who have written telling me to remain
on the air and here on the web.
[Wow! You mean you aren't actually going away? But, I thought you were so "pissed off" that
no one played along with your silly chink boycott. What has driven you to give us all
another "chance", Hal? How did we get so lucky?]
Hal Turner:Thanks to some suggestions, I am now in the process of establishing a "PAYPAL"
account to accept contributions via credit cards using secure web servers. It will take a
few days to establish this service.
[I am impressed! Where have I seen this game before? Actually, where HAVEN'T I seen this
before in right-wing poliTricks? That "letter of resignation" was a good "work", Hal. You
would have made a fair to middling carnie. First, you made the rubes think that they were
about to lose their free "fix". Then when the "shakes" begin in earnest, you offer, out of
the "goodness" of your heart, to resume plying them with their drug of choice, if they'll
only cough up a credit card number! Jabba the Falwell and Oral/Anal Roberts would be proud
of you! Look, Mr. Turner, I realize that what you do, costs money. I personally don't think
that what you do amounts to a damn thing, but that is beside the point. You could have just
asked for financial help and I would have not felt compelled to write you this letter. But,
if there is one thing that I cannot stand, it is being played for a chump. We both know
that you never had any intention of signing off the air and the web, in a phony "huff."
Between you and me, and however many folks read this on the various listservers that I post
to, you have treated your listeners in a highly contemptous fashion. You "played" them as
though they were mental midgets and the thing that really irks me, is that I think your
assessment of the average blight-winger is pretty accurate. I'm sure that when that PAYPAL
account opens, that you'll be raking in the shekels.
--Grant Bruer
P.S. Hal, below, I have included a copy of the "disclaimer" that appears on your web page.
I just thought that you would like to know that those "virulent" folks that you "publicly
DISCLAIM and REPUDIATE", make up most of the well-meaning dupes who will be sending you
their hard-earned money.
05/04/01
Subject: great website
Dear VNN,
Thanks for the great site. I read it every chance I get.
The reason I am writing is that the upcoming McVeigh execution has spurred
some thoughts I'd like to send your way.
1. Notice that McVeigh got rid of his lawyers and told the government "Kill
me. Big deal!" No Mumia and his merry band of Jews, whining that (A) I
didn't do it, and (B) You should love me because I did.
2. McVeigh kept dragging his death out until after Clinton and Reno were
out of office. He doesn't mind dying nearly as much as giving those two the
satisfaction of throwing the switch.
3. The concept of "leaderless resistance" is tempting because it (for the
most part) eliminates the problem of stool pigeons and traitors within a
movement, but it has one fatal drawback: it also eliminates the great
strength of White organizational ability. Don't forget that the British
knew *exactly* what the Germans intended for Crete, but it didn't matter
because they didn't have the strength to stop it.
4. The recent book on McVeigh mentioned a book called "Unintended
Consequences" by John Ross, which now seems to be one of McVeigh's
favorites. It's a weird book, Semitically Correct in the beginning (he has
a sympathetic Warsaw ghetto survivor, compares the fight for 2nd Amendment
rights with the civil rights movement), but hilariously Incorrect by the
end. For example, he has a White doctor conning an illiterate 15 year old
Black mother into naming her daughter "Gonorrhea" (gon-OR-e-ah), who grows
up to be a Fed, and an ATF agent named Vonetta Ecks (X?) calling the gun
owner she encounters a "White devil". The stupid and incompetent ATF agents
his hero chops up and feeds to the hogs are very diverse, while his heroes
are nearly all White (WASP and German) males. He has his movement
assassinate thinly disguised versions of Howard Metzenbaum and Charles
Schumer, but then he makes no connections to Jews in the press with the
plight of gun owners. As I said, it's a strange book, but still worth
reading.
Thanks again for the site,
D. G. Smyth
05/04/01
Subject: TO: Angry White Female
But since Scotland doesn't have a history of imperialism and slavery, other guilt
tactics have been used against my kinsmen to force them to accept the destruction of their
people, culture and country via the "diversity" breeding scam.
The above statement by "Angry White Female" is symptomatic of the generalized dumbassiness
of conservatives with regards to historical issues. Scots eagerly fought with the English
in building the British Empire. That she would use the Jew-produced Braveheart rag as a
reference to support this line only proves that she is more a tool of the Jews than she
realizes. Don't worry, AWF. Send your mailing address to
bnp@crusader.net for a FREE sample copy of Heritage and
Destiny #7, which carries an article that specifically dispels this odious myth of
Scotish innocence.
Now, back to shooting rattlesnakes in your cellar with buckshot-loaded .22 rifles
(laugh).
Brian Copp
05/03/01
Subject: Building an Alternative Media
Greeting kinsmen and women,
I sent this link to Pastor Bertollini, check out the last paragraph.
This looks like a great opportunity. I work in this field in the Bay
Area and believe me, assets are going for pennies on the dollar. Please
forward this link to anyone you think might be able to help.
http://www.ispworld.com/isp/newsletter/executive/operations_042601.htm
ORION,
Eddie
05/02/01
Subject: The Other
Hello:
For thousands of years I have been, "the other." I was "the other" when
as the seed of Abraham I journey with Jacob in the midst of a terrible
drought to Egypt. Even in the midst of plenty I was, to the citizens of
Egypt, -"the other." I was put into slavery by the Egyptians simply because
I was, -the "other." Because I was "the other," I left Egypt with 600,000 of
"the others," and journey with Moses to Mt. Sinai. At Mt. Sinai with "the
others," I accepted the Law even before we knew what the Law entailed. For
forty years I wandered with "the others" in the Wilderness. I crossed the
River Jordan and stood with Joshua and "the others" as we saw the walls of
the city of Jericho collapse. With my leaders we followed G-d's commands
being forced to fight the mighty nations of the land, simply because we were,
-"the other," in a new land. I was told by G-d, that with, -"the others," I
was to be "a light unto the nations of the world.
With "the others," I saw the building of the beautiful Temple of G-d in
Jerusalem by Solomon. With "the others" I also saw the destruction of that
beautiful Temple on the 9th of Av by the Babylonians. I was taken into
Babylonian captivity simply because I was, -"the other." I traveled back to
Jerusalem and rebuilt the Temple of G-d, never forgetting that with my
nation I was a part of, -"the others." I saw the invasion of my homeland by
the Greeks and the Romans, and treated with disdain because I was -"the
other." I saw the second Temple of G-d destroyed by the Romans, and sent
into slavery on the 9th of Av simply because I was a part of, -"the others."
I was killed in the Crusades. Why? Because I was, "the other." My Holy
Books were burned. Why? Because I was, -"the other." I was tortured during
the Inquisition, and my body was burned. Why? Because I was, -"the other."
I was forced out of many nations and my homes confiscated. Why? Because I
was ,-"the other." I was killed in the Pogroms in Russia. Why? Because I
was, -"the other." I, along with six million others were murdered by
baptized xians in the Holocaust. Why? Because I was, "the other."
Scandalous literature has always been written against me. Why? Because I
am a part of, -"the other." I have a new home, a new land, but still
terrorists would murder me. Why? Because, I am, -"the other." I may try to
hide my identity, but I will not. I may try to blend in with my nation, but
I will always be part of, -"the others." I may try to be an atheist or an
agnostic, but many still will see me as, -"the other." I may be secular, but
to others who are not like me, I will always be, -"the other"I am a Jew. I
will live as a Jew. I will gain inspiration from my Holy Books. I will
resist those who would separate me or any of my faith from Judaism. I will
live by the Torah. I will not try to hide my Judaism. Yes, I am proud that
I am a Jew. But, always, to the world, I will always be, -"the other."
Shalom,
Thomas Roper
Ed. Note: This emetic poesy exemplifies one of the
standard poses Jews adopt in in making their crooked way through the world: the heroic
martyr adrift in a harsh and uncaring -- undeserving -- world. How hard life is for "the
other." How noble is the "other," how much he has contributed, how guilty we are for
persecuting him. Life is so horrible among us that Roper's going to leave for Israel
tomorrow. Or maybe the day after.
05/01/01
Subject: Ignorance
I am white and i am sickened by the hate, why not make a porn site or
something...anything...
Ed. Note: Ignorance is indeed a horrible thing. What
really sickens you is the fear that we are right.
04/24/01
Subject: Letter sent to Red Deer Advocate
Sirs-
I must answer Greg Neiman's hysterial diatribe about the National
Alliance. First, I want to point out that I am NOT a member of the National
Alliance; however, I consider their reasonable positions on race markedly
superior to Mr. Neiman's unthinking extremism.
For, it is certainly extremist to use a recognized ethno-racial slur -
"white bread" - to describe the President of the United States, George W.
Bush, an Euro-American of English heritage. It is quite unfortunate that
Neiman is unable to make his points without descending to the gutter level
of spewing race hatred, quite unfortunate indeed. One hopes that the
Canadian human rights authorities will prove their even-handedness by
investigating such divisive and lowbrow language.
The rest of Neiman's article leaves one breathless in its lack of any
coherence. He accuses the National Alliance message of not being able to
stand up to logic, yet his attacks on the group are nothing more than ad
hominem ravings and sarcasm. Nowhere in this editorial do I see any attempt
to actually use "logic" to assail National Alliance positions. The closest
he comes is an attempt to discredit the Alliance's critiques of anti-White
politicians by reminding us that the US President is himself White. So?
Just as many Black Americans do not consider Clarence Thomas as
representative of their interests, it makes sense for the National Alliance
to feel the same about Bush or any other politician who, like Bush, supports
non-White immigration and other policies that the Alliance would consider
harmful to Euro-Americans.
It is also interesting that Neiman considers the exercise of opinion -
by leaflet distribution - to be an "act of violence" - a term which probably
would be better used to describe recent mayhem in Seattle and Cincinatti.
His statement, regarding Alliance members' comments, that "As if their
saying so would interest anyone here" is highly amusing; obviously, it has
interested Neiman sufficiently to provoke his nonsensical writing. He
accuses the Alliance of "stand[ing] for hate...fear..and violence", without
providing any evidence for this assertion. It appears that the Alliance is
interested in the same type of racial homogeneity that exists in many other
places on Earth, but is denied to European living areas - is this hate?
Fear? Violence? Is the desire of Chinese or Israelis to keep their nations
Chinese or Jewish "hate, fear, and violence?" Neiman then says that "bigot
and hate groups rely on isolation", when it is obvious that they are trying
to recruit people and reach out, not consistent with "isolation." As far as
"crackpots screaming into an illogical, irrational void", that is a
description of Neiman himself, who wishes to scare people off from looking
objectively at National Alliance policies and ideology; instead he says that
"anyone who can read or think or ask a rational question will know to stay
far, far away from the National Alliance." Very good! Instead of
investigating what the group actually stands for, just listen to Neiman and
stay "far away", why think for yourself when Neiman can do it for you?
And, finally, I note that the Chairman of the National Alliance is
named Pierce, not "Pearce"; but one should not expect any sort of accuracy
from hysterics obviously generated from a fear that someone may actually
think for themselves and look at race in an objective fashion. Can't have
that, eh, Neiman?
M. X. Rienzi
Portland, Maine
04/19/01
Subject: Cin Police
Once again, I find myself astounded that the self-described guardians of the Master Race
feel obliged to defend the COPS. Don't you know that the police would take your guns away,
throw you in jail, beat you to death, etc. if their "ZOG" masters told them to do
so?
We should have no mercy for Blacks who attack innocent Whites, but neither should we
support the glorified security guards known as the COPS just because their victims are
Black. Those riots were started because a stupid cop made a stupid mistake.
Reading the latest AR, I see that Jared Taylor printed a letter from H. Moebus as well as
the URL of his website (
www.HendrikMoebus.com ) in their "Letters to the Editor" section. They even printed a
sarcastic letter from a man who says that Jews aren't White Europeans. "Semitically-Correct
racialists"? Yeah right.
-BC
04/19/01
Subject: Feed
Great news feed, Alex! Wild "letters" column too -- we're triply
blessed this week here at the White Trash Trailer Park, eh? A Whigger
woman plumbing the depths of her self-hate, typing laboriously away at
her WebTV because her "African American" "husband" -- and those two
terms are generally only temporarily juxtaposed, until such time as the
Call Of The Wild again is heard -- obviously can't. He's not around much
anyway, is he? All sorts of mysterious "business to take care of," hm?
Ask him what a "Low Down Brother" is.
Imagine it; someone with Negroid offspring calling others "trash!"
You'll have to shout that very loudly, and in an upwards direction, to
be heard from your position in life.
Keep that word in mind, Mrs. Diversity, when the scene I've observed
a hundred times plays out again; the crying, red-faced former White
woman carrying her pathetic furnishings down three flights of stairs all
by herself as Nigger Boyfriend stands off to the side stylin', afraid to
mess up that "GQ" look, that "FUBU" gear, by helping out...
Not only this, but a semi-literate, insulting Mexican providing
proof positive of why Mex don't belong north of the border, and Brian
The Fool, another volunteer non-White, all in one go. Whee!
By the way -- VNN is a _first_-rate "web-based hate organization,"
one of the very finest.
-a reader
04/19/01
Subject: Benjamin Franklin on race (and Swedes)
To whom it may concern:
I too was very puzzled to see Franklin label the Swedes "swarthy". I know quite a few of
them, and the description does not seem entirely accurate. As to why he thought this I have
exactly no clue. While it is true that Sweden's ethnic makeup had changed dramatically in
1658 when they conquered a third of Denmark (the bastards) including some of the most
populated regions of the country at the time, I know no evidence to indicate that the
"original" Swedes were anymore "swarthy" than the Danes.
When I pointed the attention of VNN's readers to Franklin's writings, it certainly was not
my intention to imply, that what he wrote was necessarily true. Rather, the idea was to
show how he thought and felt about racial matters, i.e. that he was (in modern terms)
hatemongering, fascist, racist, xenophobic, white-bread, evil, stupid etc. etc. Presumably,
one can be all of these things and still be wrong.
I, for one, do not know the truth about race issues, in fact I used to be what you
Americans would call a knee-jerk liberal until about four years ago when we in Denmark
started to feel the enrichment of multiculturalism in earnest (riots, gangs in the parks
chasing white people and letting coloured people go, mass rapes and so on and so forth).
I have certainly realised that what I used to think was true about race and immigration
just isn't so, which is why I am currently trying to learn. It is in this context that I
find Franklin's words interesting.
I think he was obviously wrong on at least some of his facts, nevertheless his "racism" did
guide his actions, which have in turn changed the world for the better. Go to
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap001127.html
and see the Earth at night. If it were not for the American republic that Franklin helped
create IN ORDER TO SERVE HIS OWN KIND, there would still be only darkness. This proves
nothing about race, but it does show that partiality to one's own is not in itself such a
bad thing. Perhaps it should even be preferred to the somewhat foggy alternatives.
Morten M. Nielsen
P.S.
As for Danes being Germans in disguise: Bismarck conquered a part of Southern Denmark in
1864 and the Germans sought to Germanize the people there for 56 years. After WWI, in 1920
there was a referendum in which the people of Southern Jutland voted themselves back into
the kingdom. To this day it is the most nationalistic part of the country. Also, a later
German Chancellor (who appears to be popular with the editors of VNN) based his occupation
policy on the assumption that Danes and Germans were almost indistinguishably close, and
hence natural allies in his fight against the off-spring of some Middle-Eastern tribe. I
think he got a little disappointed.
04/19/01
Subject: reader mail about the swedes
(The following is for your reader mail section, if you think it'll be useful)
Judging by your reader mail in reference to Ben Franklin's comments about the
Swedes, it seems as if some people need to be set straight. If my history
isn't too shaky, during Franklin's time (or at least close to it) the Kingdom
of Sweden encompassed not only modern Sweden, but also Finland and the Baltic
states. The actual Nordic component of Swedish kingdom was certainly a
minority in Franklin's time.
As for the racial make-up of the Swedes, one only needs to take a look at the
band Pluton Svea to see that there are plenty of Swedes who aren't white, as
one of their members is significantly tainted with non-white blood. Maybe a
Mongol hoard showed up in Scandinavia, possibly some Arab traders tainted
their gene pool, and certainly some of the Vikings brought back foreign women
after traveling far and wide.
This is NOT to say that I advocate splitting hairs over who is and isn't
white, especially in Europe itself. It seems to me that the most sensible
solution to determining who does and doesn't belong in a particular European
country ought to come down to whether or not their immediate ancestors were
from that country. In America we have a much more difficult job, having to
deal not only with Mediterranean and Slavic immigrants of questionable racial
quality, but we also have the problem of Indian Savage (a Jeffersonian
term...I wonder how long it'll take the Jews to edit THAT out of the
Declaration of Independence) blood. Call me crazy, but I've met quite a few
"white power" men and women who look like they could tell you all about their
great-great grandmother Pocahontas if you got enough firewater in them
(although I usually avoid broaching the subject, as I don't want the young
braves taking to the warpath).
Great site,
Mark
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|