11/18/00
VNN Staff:
I just read Tim Crews' review of Paul Fussell's book, *Class.* What a
superb piece! Fussell was, I believe, an infantry platoon lieutenant in
France during WW II, and saw some vicious fighting. I always pay more
attention to people who were at the end of the line of all these theories
working for "a better world."
Mr. Crews' comments are as incisive as Fussell's. I grew up in the
middle-middle, and from the start it bothered me. It seemed contrived,
mindless, without vitality. Only the nearby woods held any magic for me,
and I and my pals spent most of our time there. But the suburbs are a
crushing environment, whose parameters are defined by the automobile, lawn
care, car payments and TV. I would rather collect cans from the roadside
for a living than become a suburban, middle class commuter drone--a company
man.
Mr. Crews' comments, and Mr. Fussell's, shed some light also on what has
long puzzled me: the character of the police, security, and military forces.
It is essentially middle class. It loves hierarchy and rules and authority.
It simply obeys whoever is in charge. Just before I left my National Guard
unit, I asked several of the senior sergeants: "How can you serve someone
like Clinton and Cohen and the Harvard Liberal set? Why are you their
muscle?" Most shrugged; a few said something semi-intelligent like, "That's
a good question." My point is that the headknocker mentality which has
propped up sleazy and monstrous regimes throughout history, like Stalin's,
is a fact of life, and the only way to get such people on our side is, as
Mr. Crews points out, take control. The attack dogs will follow us, then.
I am coming to realize what an impediment the middle, White population is to
our goals. Mr. Fussell used the term, "second-rate colleges." He was
writing in the early '80s, and I'm sure he had in mind the vast feed-lot
suburban, commuter colleges which middle class kids attend. I attended such
a place, and most of my energy went not into my academic studies, but into
trying to find redeeming traits in it, so that I wouldn't drop out. It was
just a diploma mill. I recall the grinning, greedy smile, barely concealed,
on the textbook buy-back man there on campus. What a racket! (In my
opinion, ALL universities are second-rate now.)
I can say, after reading Mr. Crews' review, that the Middle, White class is
the heart of our problem. If it had balls, like the Proles, it might be
useful. A Prole might be ignorant, but he'll kick your ass if you push him
too far. A Lawn Culter will call the police, or a lawyer. I think H.L.
Mencken was right: the Middle Class is the "Booboisie."
DR
Arlington, Va.
11/14/00
I read with interest and appreciation your Alaric's review of Nesta Webster's
wonderful analysis of the French Revolution. One of her most astute
observations was identification of the role of Weishaupt's Illuminati. Others
who have identified the Illuminati as the source of the disease metastisizing
through white civilization have usually (actually, _always_, in the chosenite
media machine) been branded as "conspiracy nuts". Whether or not there has
been an unbroken chain of associations bewteen the Illuminati, the Cecil
Rhodes group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Bilderbergers, no one
who really takes a step back and sees the forest as well as the trees can
doubt that all these groups have two things in common: the
egalitarian-universalist world-view, with its inevitable hatred of the white
race; and an astounding percentage of Jewish "players".
There are two other books your readers might find excellent, short companions
for Webster's book: "The Crowd," the classic examination of the psychology of
crowds, and T. Lothrop Stoddard's "The French Revolution in San Domingo," a
blood-chilling account of what happened when the brother-love philosophy of
Revolutionary France was put into practice in what is now Haiti. I recently
reread this cautionary tale, and found it had become even more timely, in view
of events in "Zimbabwe" and South Africa.
I'd like to say that your Website is one of the few beacons of hope for those
of us in whom love of our own kind still has meaning. In my career at a large
university, I'm surrounded by the thought police in both the majority of my
faculty colleagues and in most of my students. It's very easy to fall into a
sense of total isolation, and sometimes it seems as though the inmates are,
indeed, in charge of the asylum.
The midnight hour approaches, and with it, the unmasking of the New World
Order begins. Fifty years of steady brainwashing of the masses has created a
body politic so somnolent and indiscriminately receptive
that you won't hear a gasp or feel a shudder when it happens.
Very truly yours,
Friedrich der Weise
Below is an exchange between a VNN reader and the same Ms. Diane Alden we
corresponded with, which you can read in Backtalk.
11/13
Dear Miss Alden:
Regarding your contention of "an unacceptable
tyranny of the majority at some point in the
future", the tyranny is here now and it is not of
the majority, but of the minority. Even worse, a
coalition of minorities, orchestrated and conducted
by the one super minority that manages to often pass
itself off as part of the majority. Hint: there is
no such thing as a"Judeo-Christian" tradition. One
contradicts the other, when will you kosher
conservatives finally realize that? When will you
finally admit that all the problems which you
mentioned which have created or exacerbated the
present pre-secessionist crisis have paralleled the
growth of Jewish population, power, and influence in
America? When will you admit that what really
motivates the serious talk of secession is disgust
with and rejection of the hijacking of the US
government and corruption of American culture by the
Jewish Politico-Cultural Thought Control Machine, or
what White separatists refer to as the Zionist
Occupational Government? But you could never be so
gauche as to bring that up in the polite company of
newsmax.com, even if you had permission to do so,
could you?
Neither Left nor Right, Just Pro-White!
Gregory Krupey
PS: GUN CONTROL IS GOY CONTROL!
[Diane Alden's response]
> Jews aren't the problem == to blame them for
> everything that has gone wrong in this country is
> foolish. I recognize your passion on this topic but
> Jews or jewish thinking -- like the Ten Commandments
> maybe, or the old testament perhaps, are all the basis
> for our common law. The Jews were the people who
> carried that law with them wherever they went. English
> common law is derived from that tradition. While ther
> may be dumb ass jews just like there are dumb ass
> anglo saxon protestants. dumping all that has gone
> wrong in this country is just flat silly. What you are
> doing to the cause of liberty by your hatred for a
> religion and its people gives ammunitiion to the
> people like Morris Dees and the rest to call everyone
> "hate group" -- Jews lie in the major American
> battlefields all over the world so people such as
> yourself could get hot and bothered blaming a single
> religion, race, or ethnic group for our problems. If
> you are a Christian your founder loved his own people
> == to deny that is to deny the truth of who and what
> HE was. Spreading hate for a particular group does
> nothing to make any of us more free -- it only creates
> foolishness to blame one group for everything. Plus it
> is totally lacking in reality. BUT again -- you will
> never be convinced. It will take a heart change I
> since I am not the Almighty I will have to depend on
> HIM to accomplish that feat.
> "And the greatest of these is love. Whatsoever
> you do to these the least of my brethern you do to me"
> == great words from the Master himself.
> Diane
>
Ms. Alden:
Regarding your piece "PC-Rise of the Religion of the New World Order" posted on NewsMax.
com: in speaking of the Prussian-German School of New Totalitarians, you listed ten men
whom you identified as the perpetrators of this heinous philosophical trend: Hegel, Marx,
Engels, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Marcuse, Gramsci, Adorno, Horkheimer, and Habermas. You
note that "Not all are German, but they do follow the German school of thought." While you
clearly identify Gramsci as an Italian, you neglect to identify the other non-Germans in
the list. Since all these men have Germanic names, anyone unfamiliar with their backgrounds
would be puzzled as to what their ethnicity might be, and since you didn't spell it out,
they would probably assume that they were Germans after all, except for Gramsci. This is
very misleading, and is obviously what you intended. For out of the ten, only Hegel,
Schopenhauer, and Nietzsche were actually Germans; the rest--Marx, Engels, Marcuse, Adorno,
Horkheimer, and Habermas, six out of ten--were not Germans but Jews AND YOU DAMN WELL KNOW
IT!
[Editor's note: In the interest of accuracy and truth, the writer
of this letter later contacted us and has asked us to make one small correction: Engels was
not a Jew, but, like many similar types to be seen again in 1960s America, was born
to a highly repected and wealthy German family.]
Similarly, the others you mentioned--Freud, Fromm, Adorno, Pollock, Benjamin, Lowenthal--
are all Jews as well. (And I'd be willing to bet Kirkheimer was, as well.) Yes, they were
"German-Jews" in the sense that they were born and raised in Germany, but they were no more
true Germans than Lenin, Trotsky, Kamenev, Zinoviev, Radek, Martov, Litvinov, Kaganovich,
and the other Jewish Bolsheviks who destroyed Russia in the name of Marx and Engels were
real Russians. They were no more true Germans than Schumer, Boxer, Feinstein, Lieberman,
Lautenberg, Wellstone, Greenspan, Albright, Cohen, Dershowitz, Spielberg, and Jonathan Jay
Pollard are real Americans just because they happened to have been born here.
What could account for such deliberate deception on your part? An excessive hatred for
Germans married to an idolatrous love of the Jews? Fear of the Jews? Inherent mendacity or
simple cowardice? This is not a moot point; you are indulging in disinformation, in
propaganda, in LIES when you seek to put the anti-German, pro-Jewish spin on this matter.
Does your editor at NesMax know of this serious breach of journalistic ethics on your part,
or did they require it?
My God, where does this suffocating smog of Jewish propaganda end? When will some sunlight
break through and pierce the darkness to let the truth, even a little shaft of it, shine
through? But then, vampires fear the light...why are you protecting vampires while defaming
the living, Ms. Alden? Why are you claiming that Germans invented feminism when every
single article of modern feminist dogma came out of one book written by the Jew Engels?
Why are you blaming Germans for inventing "racism" when it is a contrivance of your
precious Holy Chosen People, honed to its finest arrogant point in their hideous Talmud?
You know as well as I do that the Frankfort School was in Germany, but not of it. Why do
you think its members all had to skedaddle from Germany the minute Hitler took over? Why do
you think they found refuge here in the USA, where their ideas found greater acceptance
than they ever did in Germany? Who welcomed and sheltered them here, and provided them with
government jobs and university positions? German-Americans? No, their kinsmen and fellow
subversives, that's who! You should know the rule of thumb, Ms. Alden: if the surname's
German, if the ideology is Marxist, and the actions are subversive, nine times out of ten
IT'S A JEW!
But it doesn't look like you respectable right-wing Christian cons are ever going to get
it, or admit it. Which is fine by me. You can all holler about the New World Order until
your faces turn purple; but if you won't truthfully identify its perpetrators, you will be
as relentlessly crushed by it as any couch potato who never paid attention to you. In fact,
you will be crushed even more ruthlessly, when you are no longer needed, as useful idiots
always are.
11/12/00
Dear Sir
Whoa !!! That anonymous post from 07 Nov in your 'letters' column - that's
got Izzy's pastrami all over it! Ya see, the
hebes get real frustrated, apoplectic really, when they
are constantly reminded of their own disgusting, criminal, neurotic,
hypocritical behavior.
So the excessively unequipped to withstand any scrutiny pull on their sheeps
clothing, slither anonymously onto a White Man's message board, then affect
the posture of a demoralized White human being. Trouble is, it's all so easy
to recognise that it isn't really sporting to catch 'em out and humiliate
'em publicly. Kinda takes some of the fun out of it -- but don't get me
wrong, it's still fun. They just never can seem to get the hang of
disguising that effeminate sniveling -- gives 'em away every time, hehe.
Whenever you read or hear a tearful "aw, shucks, I'm givin' it all up",
that's most likely just the keen of an angry, frustrated yid. Real White
people don't talk that way.
Regards
Jacob Rasmussen
11/6/00
Dude ! Great Site !
Just got turned on to it through Robert Frenz's
www.faem.com
Keep it up. The excuse makers will eventually begin to see these "chosen"
vermin as the perpetual cultural AIDS infection that they are. And the kooky
koshers seem perplexed as to why they have been physically thrown out of
every territory in which they have pitched their collective tents throughout
history. I only chuckle, hehe.
Check out:
Close-up pictures of the blast damage to the USS Cole caused by so-called
terrorists in a small boat (yeah, sure).
http://vialls.homestead.com/cole1.html
Credible case made on this page that the attack was made by israeli aircraft
firing an israeli manufactured air-to-ship missile.
Best Regards,
and I'm sendin' your site to friends 'round the world
Jacob Rasmussen
Slagelse, DK
11/7/00
And then there were none
Whites are metaphorical descendants of the Dodo. Only difference? There
were some lamentations about that disappearance. No one will lament the
extinction of a herd of spineless dupes who participated gleefully in their
own victimization, who willingly allowed themselves to be driven en-masse
over the cliffs. SPLAT! Sorry guys, but Darwinism rules and They Who Must Be
Obeyed have proved the fittest by far.
(Anonymous)
11/1/00
From: "Tsun" tsun@nacs.net
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 10:44:38 -0500
To: lbowles@worldnetdaily.com
Cc: "Joseph Farah" jfarah@worldnetdaily.com
, arlmr@cableone.net
Dear Mrs. Bowles,
I just read a letter that a man named Jack Halliday sent you. I hope you took what he said
to heart:
If we expect to save our civilization, it is necessary to NAME the enemy. Whatever else you
do, and however good you do it, if you don't do that, all your efforts will be in vain.
I realize that under normal circumstances it is unfair to hold all members of a group
responsible for the crimes committed by some members. But we are not dealing with normal
circumstances: We are at WAR, and they started it.
Leading "jews" and "jewish organizations" are (and have been) responsible for the gutting
of our civilization and the destruction of our nation. They don't intend to stop there;
what they aim to achieve is the elimination of our race. There may be a few "jews" who
oppose this, but most of them seem very satisfied by it all. From my association with many
"jews," I have seen that most of them know all about it.
"Jews" are behind the controlled liberal media; they run "Gun Control;" "jews" are
responsible for opening our borders and keeping them open; they formed the core of old time
communism as well as the new left. Now, throughout the "Western" world, "jews" have opened
the floodgates to non-white immigration, which is literally washing White European heritage
away. Even in the European nations!
I rarely meet a non-"jew" liberal who can think as well as the average "jew" liberal. Few
"gentile" liberals can think at all. That can only mean one thing: Holding liberal ideas
in one's mind destroys that mind and wrecks its capacity for logical thought. But the "jew"
liberals don't really believe the non-sense they peddle. Social and political ideas are
merely tools to them, to be used for the "job" at hand. They pick up the hammer of
"communism;" or the wrench of "capitalism;" the saw of "anti-communism;" the screwdriver
of "diversity," and so on, as the job requires.
So, it's time to wake up and sound the alarm. Twenty years ago, all "conservatives" knew
the name of the enemy, though most were afraid to breathe it aloud. Unfortunately, today,
due to the poison pill of "neo-conservatism," there are thousands (if not millions) of new
"conservatives" who haven't a clue. And the leading (pun intended) "conservative" pundits
and organs are keeping them in the dark. Please do what you can to remedy that situation.
Most intelligent and informed conservatives are aware of the facts above. I think you,
too, understand, but perhaps you hope there is a cure without NAMING the enemy. There is
not!
Regards,
Mr. Tsun
P.S. Here's a link to a page with Halliday's letter.
10/26/00
There is an interesting comparison becoming extant that I believe is
missed by most folks, the comparison of heroes and cowards. If you were
listening recently and not too closely, almost immediately after the
attack on the Cole, backwoods Billy immediately labeled the attack as a
"cowardly act." Shortly after that pronouncement, Billy called the two
alleged terrorists that were supposedly manning the inflatable
"cowards." (I have trouble with the entire story as I own an inflatable
and standing at attention in such a craft while underway would be a
heroic act in itself, but that's another story) Now aside from the fact
that backwoods Billy has first hand experience with the commission of
cowardly acts, his evasion of military service during Vietnam while
others went and died comes to mind here, we have in this instance a
classic juxtapositioning of terms.
If one wasn't too busy watching the ball games last summer, one might
have caught the story about the confederate submarine "CSS Hunley,"
being raised off the bottom just outside of Charleston harbor, off the
coast of South Carolina. The sub contains the remains of nine men, eight
of whom cranked a shaft that propelled the craft and its 90 pound charge
mounted on a 20 foot spar mounted on the bow of the craft. The idea was
to ram this charge into the side of the "USS Housatonic," a federal
blockade ship.
The year was 1864 and the South had all but lost the war. The federal
blockade was starving Charleston and the rebel cause. The situation was
desperate and called for desperate action much like the situation with
the Palestinian Arabs with nought more then rocks to throw at their
Israeli enemy. Like the confederates of 1864, the Arabs are in desperate
straights. The Hunley had already lost two other crews along with her
designer during training accidents, before any hostile acts were
attempted. The crews clearly felt that the Hunley mission was a suicide
mission and it turned out they were right, but they volunteered for this
desperate mission anyway. Now here is the question: Would you label such
individuals and their acts - "Patriotic heroes" committing "heroic
acts," or "cowards" committing "cowardly acts?"
Admittedly backwoods Billy has taken no position, official or
otherwise, on the matter of the Hunley crew, but others, notably some
politicians, have called these men heroes. Likewise, others have called
those backwoods Billy terms "cowardly terrorists" - "heroes." Ironically
many of the same ilk that today call these confederate men "heroes" were
calling them "cowardly rebels" 136 years ago.
Generally it has been long accepted in the full scope of human
endeavors that the status of a coward lies somewhere below that of pond
scum. Furthermore such pond scum antecedents cannot be relied on to have
an accurate or acceptable view on matters such as whom is a coward and
whom is a hero. Although I served in the Marines during Vietnam, unlike
backwoods Billy, I do not feel I can make any realistic judgments on
these matters. There are seemingly cases where one man's hero is another
man's terrorist, but I have long noticed that men composed of sterner
stuff then gelatinous mould, generally do not label their enemies
cowards.
A notable exception to this general statement are the Afrikaner
soldiers I have known in the past. Many of these soldiers had great
derision for the black soldiers they were fighting and as an opponent
often held the blacks in contempt as a cowardly enemy. It was common for
them to say without any bravado "well the odds were 20 to 1 against us,
but we felt that this was no problem. However this is definitely an
exceptional case and I have heard these same soldiers say, "but when we
came up against the Cubans in Angola that was different story, those
were some tough bastards." In any event, what can one say to such
soldiers? After all they were there in the midst of the fray, whom to
better judge an enemy - especially their enemy?
Much more common is the case that soldiers who have actually entered
combat usually having considerable respect for their enemies. Although
the W.W.II propaganda masters labeled the Japanese as "little yellow
cowards that hide and shoot from trees and under rocks," I notice that
the men I have spoken with that actually fought these Japanese soldiers
in places like Tarawra and Iwo Jima, do not consider this an accurate
description.
These soldiers, while perhaps maintaining great enmity for the Japanese
as a vicious, deadly enemy that brooked no mercy, certainly did not
consider the Japanese cowards. The suicide attacks of the Japanese at
the end of the war were, as designed, devastating on the moral of the
men aboard ships in the Pacific. To my limited knowledge, no one who was
there has ever classified the Japanese suicide attacks as "cowardly."
That pronouncement was made by the Hollywood moguls that were safely
ensconced in their fantasy world, thousands of miles away from the
reality of those attacks.
In this light, I cannot help but wonder, should others accept an
untested individual's pronouncement on such matters? Especially when
these individuals have never actually faced those they label as cowards?
Even more to the point though, can a coward's pronouncement on such
matters be taken seriously by anyone who has risen above the level of
pond scum?
G. Ley
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|