|
08/25/01
Subject: ADL indoctrinating NJ cops
Training will aid cops against hate crimes
Published in the Home News Tribune 8/22/01
By CRISSA SHOEMAKER
GANNETT NEW JERSEY
SOMERVILLE -- The Somerset County Police Academy and the Anti-Defamation League have formed
a partnership to provide training on extremist groups and bias crimes.
The partnership -- which may be the first of its kind between the ADL and a police academy
in the state -- was announced during an afternoon news conference yesterday at the Somerset
County Prosecutor's Office in Somerville.
Charles "Shai" Goldstein, regional director of the ADL, said education for law-enforcement
officers has "become increasingly crucial because of the nature of bias crimes."
While most people who commit hate crimes are not part of a group, Goldstein said, "the most
heinous of the crimes" are usually committed by members of extremist hate groups, such as
the National Alliance and the World Church of the Creator.
Prosecutor Wayne J. Forrest said the training will be offered to active law-enforcement
officers throughout the state. The one-day programs will be added to the more than 100
in-service courses already offered through the academy.
Goldstein said he hopes the program, which should start in the fall, will be so successful
that it spreads to the other police academies in the state and all officers will have
access.
"This is not a one-shot deal," he said. "When we get involved with a law-enforcement
agency, we consider it a lifetime relationship."
The training will focus on the extremist groups, who they are and how they react to
situations, Goldstein said. The courses will not be open to the public.
As part of a national law-enforcement initiative, the ADL also has launched a Web site --
www.adl.org -- with information geared toward police officers dealing with hate crimes and
extremism.
"Being a law-enforcement officer is one of the most difficult jobs in the world, and it
becomes increasingly difficult," Goldstein said. "Anything we can do to make a
law-enforcement officer's job easier, we'll do it, in the world of bias crimes and
extremist groups."
© 2001 Gannett New Jersey Group
Ed. Note: A convicted Jewish hate group is paid to spread
its anti-White poison. Jews are your enemy, White man.
=======================================================
08/25/01
Subject: Court TV
Court TV indoctrinating our youth. These programs are shown early Saturday mornings. Look
at some of the planned programs they have in store. I thought this may be interesting. If
you watch the show itself, you will see that it is anti-white, pro-nig (surprise!).
http://www.courttv.com/choices/yourturn/index.html
http://www.courttv.com/choices/yourturn/hatecrimes/index.html
Try not to vomit.
Mike
==================================
08/23/01
Subject: Info wanted on hate crime hoax
Sometime in the 1980s Rubin was arrested for doing a "hate crime" on a Jew-Christian
building in Southern California. He was painting swastikas etc on it when cops caught him.
I have searched the internet to find this but cannot locate a source can you help?
[Anon.]
Ed. Note: If any VNN readers can nail this down,
please write us with the details, including source.
08/22/01
Subject: Media owes Sighthill Scots a huge apology!
Copy of LTE to Scottish paper...
Dear Scotsman editor:
I have been following your "racism" stories ever since the PREJUDICIAL assumption was made
that a Scottish racist killed the Kurdish asylum seeker. Today, I learned the alleged
killer also attacked a white German foreigner as well, and I am mad as hell!
Now, the media in Scotland and all over the U.K. has been wringing their hands over this
killing, and in the process they demonized and already ailing community of Scots in
Sighthill. How many stories from the press and condemnations from the U.N.? An entire
community was trashed, based on PREDUDICE AGAINST ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SCOTS. And I
don't even see a retraction in your paper after you annhilated your fellow Scots! Geez,
we have more brotherhood with fellow Scots here in the U.S.! How about 50 or 60 stories
about the plight of those who have been harassed because of this hysterical, PREDUDICIAL
coverage? Did you stop and think about that, and the fact no racial motive was ever
established before you went on your witch hunt? You might have well just accused your
brothers of harboring child molesters in dozens of stories, and then just dropped it! Will
the people of the U.K. even find out that "white racism" was not responsible for the man's
death? Will the Kurdish community apologize for framing Scots? Will the media admit their
mistake or keep repeating it as if they were on a witch hunt? Or are white Scots all
guilty by virtue of their ancestry?
I believe you and all other U.K. papers owe the Sighthill Scots community a huge apology
for your baseless assumption that racists among them killed the Kurdish man. While you are
at it, you might want to look at crime stats and see how many "race attacks" against Scots
and English Oldham residents have occurred. Or do they not count anymore in their own
homeland?
Too often, people of European descent are falsely accused of racism, then raked over the
coals. In the U.S., hate crimes laws have been passed over such alleged acts, only to find
out someone burned his own church down for insurance money or the crime was faked. Offhand,
I can think of two federal laws passed over incidents that whites did not commit. In both
cases, the truth ended up on the back pages, and the vast majority of Americans still think
white racists comitted them. That is an OUTRAGE.
We are a tolerant people and we are tired of the media whipping up hatred against us here
and abroad. In the U.S., 90% of all interracial crime is minority against white, but it is
always whites who are blamed. Isn't it about time to stop libeling and slandering the
people of European descent? All it does is promote hatred against us and racial attacks
which the media conveniently fail to report.
I know exactly what the U.K. media will do instead of EATING CROW. They (including you)
will print subsequent articles leaving out the fact that your hysteria was premature and
that you, without evidence of a racial motive, stirred up already existing racial tentions
in the Sighthill community. I guess it's OK to smear mere white folks to sell papers,
because they, not you, have to face the repurcussions in the streets. I bet you'll never
apologize, rather you will continue on the same path, omitting this murder as part of your
"get Scotty" campaign. It doesn't fit with your white racism theme. You people are
totally insensitive.
From an exiled Scot
Heredity-- Clan Donald
=============================
08/22/01
Subject: Significance Of ABC "Nightline" Segment
A mention of Japan that we saw on the VNN news website (www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com) gave
us the idea to mention this as a list topic.
------
Recently (about 4 or 5 days ago) the ABC TV program "Nightline" aired a segment about a
seemingly uninteresting topic: The Prime Minister of Japan visiting a shrine in Japan that
is apparently frequented by so-called "right-wing extremists" or, also, "nationalists" as
they have been variously described in the press.
Now, you might ask yourself why "Nightline" (hosted by the Jewish, extra-tolerant anchor
Ted Koppel*, and produced by mostly Jewish personnel at ABC) would bother with such an
insignificant event that happened across the world in Japan. (*In 1987, Koppel blasted a
White baseball manager, on the air, who made an un-P. C. comment suggesting that Blacks do
not make good baseball managers, at least, as good as Whites. Koppel was visibly angry at
the guest; how dare a White guy be un-P. C.!!).
Who cares, right?
Well, there is a very good reason why "Nightline" aired that segment, even though the event
in question did not even occur in the West.
If there is one thing, just ONE thing, that the heavily-Jewish media is very, very scared
of, it is ANY nationalism occurring ANYWHERE in the entire world.
That's right. Even though it happened 10,000 miles away in Japan, it does not matter.
"Nationalism" (a race/ethnic group working as one, to protect or further its own interests)
was the ideology of Hitler, and Imperial Japan, and is the current ideology of David Duke
and the Klan, and of many concerned citizens all over the world. (Japan still is
nationalistic to a degree, and proud of its heritage, unlike we in the U. S., who no longer
even have a day set aside for our main Founder George Washington; but we do have one for a
Black Marxist: Martin Luther King, Jr.).
They (the heavily-Jewish media) could not just let that event in Japan pass. No way. Sorry.
They must demonize ANYONE who shows any sign of nationalist thinking. They must. No choice.
No ifs, ands or buts about it. It is an automatic, inborn reaction.
It must be stressed that this issue goes far beyond the usual "left" or "right" political
ideology. It is racial, not simply political.
But, wait! That is not the funny part.
The funny part is that Jews, as an ethnic group/race (not simply as a religion), are the
most nationalistic people ON EARTH! They fight hard for themselves, and stick together like
glue, from a genetic/cultural standpoint, even if most seem to be "leftist" and only some
are "rightist." So much so that, in recent DNA data by Dr. Michael Hammer of the University
of Arizona (we at CPTWC have this data), it is shown that Jews still have strong genetic
similarities no matter where they live in the world (the old Khazar theory
was apparently a smokescreen by Koestler).
Why?
Because they interbred and intermarried with ONLY other Jews for many centuries, and,
further, they still do! It is still very rare to see Jews marrying non-Jews (filmmaker
Steven Spielberg is a rare exception to that rule). The Jewish author J. Halberstam
mentions this reluctance of modern Jews to marry outsiders in his book "Smoozing," 1997,
Perigee Books.
They are infamous for working extremely hard toward their own interests, much harder than
any other groups, whether they are "left-wing" or "right-wing" Jews.
Yep, you see, they are allowed to be very, very nationalistic, but no one else is allowed
to be. No way. Can't happen.
Now you hopefully have a better understanding of God's Jewish pets.
--------
CPTWC
(Center to Preserve Traditional Western Culture)
Tucson, AZ.
===============================
08/21/01
Subject: Jewish wife
Dear VNN, I share many of the concerns that you have, beleve me I used to live in a
mixed black and white "hood" and it was the worst time of my life. I slept with a gun in
my bed. And the immigration proplem is out of controll. Our race is doomed if this is
allowed to go on. How ever my wife is jewish and shares the same concerns you and I share.
And I have been around a lot of other jewish people and they are worried also. The elites
of both the jewish and gentile communities are hell bent on destroying this country. I
could go on and on about the horrors I and my wife have been through living in detroit but
you people already know the stories, they even become boring after awhile. My wife and I
both study martial arts and when the country goes to hell we will go down figthing.
Thank you, E
P.S. my wife has blonde hair and lite green eyes
EricTaeKwon@aol.com
=====================================
08/20/01
Subject: Enemy at the Gates
Enemy at the Gates: Another perspective
by Someonestillemployedinthesystem
I am astonished by Toni Brian’s review of Enemy at the Gates.
It is as close as one can come to a Revisionist Classic while still being distributed in
ordinary theaters.
In France the Communists have rioted at theaters that presented this film. I think I can
explain why.
The first introduction that the Russian hero has to the Stalingrad front is watching the
officers shoot unarmed draftees, then he is sent into his first battle with only a clip of
bullets and told to pick up the rifle of the soldier in front of him after that soldier is
killed. The military police set up machine guns behind the troops when they charge and kill
all of the survivors of the hopeless charge who try to retreat.
When the German loudspeakers come on they are ironic commentary since almost all of the
Russian troops they are talking to are dead. What the audience has seen makes it very clear
that Russian cannon fodder could do worse than surrender at the first possibility.
Now, in other movies, what comes next would be an example of Nazi barbarity. German troops
on armored vehicles roam the battlefield spraying the dead or wounded Russians with machine
gun bullets.
But in Enemy at the Gates this atrocity is revealed to be simple commonsense when
the Russian "hero", Zaitsev, hidden in a pile of Russian corpses takes up a rifle and kills
five Germans after having been sent into the battle with only his clip and having seen half
of his friends machine gunned by the Soviet military police.
Throughout the film the Soviet officials are shown to dishonest and cruel and absolutely
careless of the lives of the common people. Nikita Khruschev arrives a Stalin’s emissary
and forces the local commander to shoot himself. It is made explicit that commanders who
fail are shot and their families arrested. It is also made explicit that the top Soviet
officials do not suffer a shortage of vodka and caviar or any other luxuries while our
"hero" is only given a new uniform to talk to a press conference.
Hitler is rarely in evidence in this film, but gargantuan statues of Stalin abound and the
Communist officials talk about Stalin as if he were God himself.
Danilov, the poitical commissar, is a Jew. What other movie would admit there were
political commissars or worse stress their Jewish ethnicity? What other movie would show a
group of political commissars to be a lunatic group of bloodthirsty fanatics?
In what other movie would a sympathetic character explain that he could see no difference
between" their Adolf" and "our Joseph" and give an explicit description of the tortures he
had received at the hands of Soviet secret police to make him confess to something he had
not done? This same character accuses the German of not caring any more about enlisted men
than "we care about Ukrainians" only to be proved completely wrong.
I am certain that there was gnashing of teeth in a certain community when the obligatory
reference to the Holocaust is made in this film. The Jewish heroine wants to leave the safe
intelligence job that had been arranged for her by Political Commissar Danilov and become
a sniper. She explains that the Nazis had shot a group of civilians, including her parent,
that they had expelled from the city on a bridge after tying couples together so that only
one bullet would be needed to kill two people. This comes after the movie has made it
extremely clear that it was not the Germans who needed to economize on bullets up to this
point in the battle. Danilov tries to dissuade her with the argument that well educated
college graduates like them should not waste their lives actually fighting, that sort of
thing is for barely literate peasants like Zaitsev.
But what about the German character? Throughout the film he is portrayed as a pure
professional doing his job. He is guilty at the end of a strange atrocity. He actually
kills an active Soviet guerilla who had repeatedly betrayed him and tried to get him
killed. He kills this person after making a strong effort to persuade the person to simply
stay across the lines in the Red Army's zone of control. He goes so far as to make this
person promise not to come back to the German zone of control. The person was a child, but
also was an extremely dangerous Soviet agent.
Aside from this, Enemy at the Gates is filled with some great acting and
tremendously realistic combat scenes.
Sincerely,
Someonestillemployedinthesystem
08/20/01
Subject: Koko the Gorilla: IQ = 85
So says the scientist who has raised Koko and communicates with her in American sign
language. In a TV show about Koko that aired yesterday, Penny (?) reported that she had
tested Koko's IQ and found it to be 85, or "15 points lower than the average person."
She didn't mention that the median IQ of American coloreds is 80 and the median IQ of
natives in central Africa (who had not discovered the wheel when the
Portuguese explorers arrived) is in the 60s or 70s.
Koko and another captive gorilla, Michael, know more than 500 words in American sign
language and combine words on their own to express different ideas. Michael told the story
of his childhood -- how his mother was shot by Africans and he was captured and sold. It's
the same story a white child in Africa might tell. The
show also reported that scientists recently discovered that wild gorillas have their own
sign language.
Surfing over to the History Channel, a show about the Hitler Youth offered a deliberately
confusing explanation as to how the group acquired 20 lavish estates formerly owned by
wealthy Jews for an elite school. To images of Kristolnacht, the narrator explained that
the Jews had to leave Germany or sell their homes because of the boycott of 1933. Of
course, it went unmentioned that the 1933 boycott was a Jewish boycott of Germany.
See this week's Time magazine for a report about military nogs in Okinawa and the bottom
caste Japanese girls who fuck them, and a surprisingly favorable cover story about home
schooling, with dissenting quotes from the chosen.
Ed. Note: Koko is smarter and less violent than the niggers
she's descended from.
=====================
08/20/01
Subject: Their Negro Golem
I just finished David Horowitz's article Black "Leaders" and the Enemies of Israel. It's
funny, but all my life I have heard how smart the Jews are and how they get ahead not
because they pose themselves as a collective entity, but simply because they are soooo much
smarter then everyone else - really? The Jews have an old, old, story about a mythical
character called a Golem. Basically the story is about a persecuted Jewish community (what
a refreshing change eh?) To counter their persecutors, the community's Rabbis band together
in the dead of night and by candlelight, create a human effigy out of clay and then, along
with various magical incantations, breath life into the Golem much as their god does in the
book of Genesis. The Golem comes to life and the Rabbis send it out to wreak vengeance on
their oppressors. After carrying out the Rabbi's orders for vengeance, the Golem returns to
the Rabbis. The Rabbis then try to destroy the Golem and the evidence of its existence in
order to erase their culpability in wreaking their vengeance on a community that may well
return that vengeance in kind at a later time. The Golem is a brutish entity with what we
would term today as a very low IQ. In fact the Golem barely understands its own existence,
but even with its limited intellect it well understands the purpose that it has been
brought forth for and that the Rabbis are now trying to destroy it. The Golem responds to
the Rabbi's attempts to destroy it with anger and in turn the Golem destroys the Rabbis
that brought it to life. I read this story as a kid and the message to me was clear, "be
careful what you create for vengeance as it may well turn on you and destroy you." Well it
seems the Jews have missed the message of their own instructive myth, then again maybe not.
Recently I went to the Public Library to find this story and read the story again. To my
amazement when I found the various copies of the story, they had all been changed. The
"modern" version of this story now has the Golem being brought forth simply to do some
labor which is beyond normal human capability and then being calmly put back to sleep by
the clever Rabbis for their future use. Of course this totally alters the meaning of the
original where the Golem turns on its masters. I am not sure why the Jews would change this
story to make a "happy ending" but in any case the new version leaves readers scratching
their heads wondering why anyone would write such a meaningless, self-sanctifying story in
the first place. Perhaps this is why Jews like Horowitz are scratching their collective
heads over why their Negro Golems are increasingly turning on them, they never read their
own story in its original form.
Arch Stanton
==========================
08/20/01
Subject: Vanguard News Network
Dear VNN,
I thank you for putting into words my observations in the American society in the last few
years. As a seventeen-year-old working his way through high school, I have had little to
no exposure to any views other than that of the Jew-stained, rehashed garbage I read in the
textbooks and hear from my under-qualified teachers. I'm glad to see I'm not alone in my
observations of some pseudo-elite society pushing anti-white messages onto the people of
America. Keep up the good work, and I'll start sending donations (when I can find a place
that will hire me, an educated white American, as opposed to some lazy forty-year-old Spic
who can't even speak a drop of English).
--
=====================================
08/20/01
Subject: Pathetic Internet Cowards
Hello!
I just wanted to let you know that visiting your web site has given me great comfort.
I feel so much better now, knowing that you'll be burning in a much hotter place in hell
than I.
Have a wonderful life. I'll see you in hell.
Jeremy Crockett
Ed. Note: The Devil is my personal spiritual trainer -- I
have him from 4:00 to 5:00 on Thursdays -- and last session he informed me personally that
he has a hard-on for Christian morons like, I'm guessing, you. In addition to being
stabbed in the nether regions by pitchforks and other cylindrical instruments of terror
unceasingly for all eternity your ears will be taped open that you may enjoy perpetual
cycling of Hansen's second album. Yeah, that's right -- the one without the cool Mmmmbop.
Oh how painful that will be for you.
===============================
08/20/01
Subject: 'White flight' and NPR
Resist Def letters to NPR...
Greetings:
National Public Radio now knows that a lot of people view "white flight" as a hate phrase.
That's the beauty of sending the same critical letter to several email addresses. It
creates a much larger audience. Here are eight excellent letters, edited for space
considerations.
Stanley Womack
Subj: NPR's ethnic double standard
Date: 8/18/01 5:35:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time
To whom it may concern:
Scenario #1: A PERSON moves from the city to the suburbs. If this person were African
American, Hispanic American or Asian American, this would be deemed "improving one's lot in
life," or "increasing the cultural diversity" of the new neighborhood. If this person were
European American, it would be denigrated as "White flight."
Scenario #2: A PERSON moves from the country or the suburbs into the city. If this person
were black, brown or yellow, this would be considered nothing more than, "contributing to
the multicultural environment" of the city, or "living within one's means," if it were
known to have been done for financial reasons. If this person were White, however, it
would immediately be slurred as "gentrification."
Does anyone else besides me see what is wrong with this picture? Why the double standard?
And what, pray tell, are European Americans permitted to do without being hit with
derogatory labels and ethnic insults? It seems European Americans can't live ANYWHERE
without being criticized. So where ARE we supposed to go? Should we fly to the moon? Or
would that, too, be tagged, LITERALLY, as "White flight?" On your Morning Edition
broadcast of Friday, 8/10/01, the host of the show, Renee Montagne, used the horrible
racist phrase "White flight." This is not the first time I have heard this repugnant
phrase of bigotry used on NPR, but I sincerely hope it will be the last.
0==0==0==0
Subj: I, for one, do NOT "flee"
Date: 8/18/01 12:29:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Lieber Freunde:
Witness your broadcast of 10 Aug 01, Morning Edition, hosted by Renee Montagne, in which
guest Jim Hahn (Mayor of Los Angeles, CA) made a tour of his childhood neighborhood:
Shortly after the beginning of this tour, Ms Montagne makes the comment, "When blacks began
moving in in the 1950's, most whites fled..."
So, according to you, when people of European descent move from the cities, they are not
"pushed away," nor are they "driven out." They "flee." But when African Americans move
away, they are merely "seeking better circumstances?" Or when Asian Americans relocate,
they are only "emigrating?" Or when Hispanic Americans go from one place to another, they
are just "engendering a more diverse community structure?"
Indeed. As an Austrian I am insulted by this turn of phrase that you so cavalierly bandy
about. The double standard here is so tangible that it is an almost physical slap in the
face to any person of European ancestry, and I think you owe all of us an apology.
0==0==0==0
Subj: "White Flight" Smears Celtic-Americans
Date: 8/18/01 8:00:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time
To Morning Staff at NPR:
We wonder what the motive of R. Montagne might have been in choosing to belittle all
Celtic, Germanic, Greek, Italian, Gallic, Slavic & Iberian Americans in their choices of
where to live with the insidious slur "white flight."
First, we recognize it is her sneaky way of smothering all diversity within the European
American community by labeling us "white" and nothing but "white." This is a
well-recognized ploy in the faux multicultural "leadership."
Second, we recognize it is her scandalous way of disparaging "whites" who choose to move
elsewhere as doing it the way a bird does it...by flying. That is, she was obviously
labeling all "whites" as cowards.
Third, we recognize it is her vicious way of claiming to have the power to name and label
all European Americans and to describe them with her negative stereotyping. In the event
that you believe that you have the authority to so label us, let us assure you that your
hatred does not carry the power to tell us our name....we reject your pitiful
droolings.
Fourth, we believe that she thought she could unleash her sense of superiority (whatever
race or national origin she may hail from) over all the members of subordinated European
American ethnic groups by mocking them with the hate speech of those who are closest to
her....like you. Well, those days are over.
STOP YOUR TAXPAYER-PAID HATE SPEECH.
0==0==0==0
Subj: Renee Montagne/Morning Edition Friday August 10, 2001
Date: 8/18/01 12:29:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Oh, how sad! To hear such a hateful phrase as "white flight" being tossed about with such
abandon, yet again! Why are European Americans singled out for this dubious honor? You
people at NPR, of all places, should know better!
I point out to you that African Americans who are leaving the southern parts of California
in droves have never been said to be engaging in "black flight." Many, if not most
American Jews can trace their roots back to Ellis Island, yet never have I seen those who
no longer live on the Lower East Side being accused of "Jewish flight." So why, then, is
it only European Americans who are said to "flee?" And if European Americans choose to
move INTO the city? Oh, well, then, we are said to be part of the "gentrification" of the
metropolis! So where ARE we permitted to live without derogatory commentary, then?
I am a European American, more specifically a German American. I have lived in a number of
places, within cities, suburbs and rural areas, of the United States. I moved to these
places because it pleased me to do so, for whatever reasons, whether they were, in part,
because I wished to be closer to my job or closer to nature. But I did not "flee" from, or
to, anywhere, I am not part of any attempt at "gentrification," and I thoroughly resent
the implications that are conjured up by such phrases. I ask you, then, to please be a bit
more careful in your speech. I am certain that you have offended a great many people by
adopting this pattern of hate-speech directed at European Americans.
Ed. Note: NPR is nothing but 24/7 Judeo-parasitic
hate-radio feasting off unwilling White earners. As Thomas Jefferson would say, NPR is
Jewish tyranny, because it forces a man to subsidize opinions he doesn't share. Make the
smug, supercilious yids work for a living, White man. Join the revolution.
==================================
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|