|
Letters through 2/13/02
======================================
Subject:
======================================
Subject: Locke on Buchanan
Mentions Turner Diaries half-respectfully half-dismissively, asks if there's anything else treating the same subject: minority-filled AmeriKwa.
Here.
Ed. Note: As far as I know Robert Locke is not a Jew. If true, he's one of very few at Frontpagemag who isn't. He almost touches on the problem in this column regarding the debate around Buchanan's new book. But, of course, he avoids mentioning the Jewish ethnic interest in destroying cohesive White America. His boss Horowitz laughs up his sleeve at his stupid readers when he writes ridiculous things like America could survive as America if it were 90% non-White as long as its political culture remained -- as though culture is independent of race, and as though race doesn't exist. At the end of the day of course there's nothing like Turner Diaries because the truth is in Jews' interests to hide, not disclose, and so they'd never allow a mainstream work to appear. It's all a big game to these Jews, and guys like Locke don't dare cross them because that's where paychecks stop. But we're starting to break through. The trickle isn't a deluge yet, but liars like Horowitz are getting more scared with each passing day. As Locke half-senses, our power comes from the fact that the truth is on our side. As are increasing numbers of awakened Whites. Keep pressing, people, The Day of the Rope is coming.
======================================
Subject: Debt and ZOG
Dear VNN
Will Zogs war on humanity be stopped short by a financial
earthquake.A number of storms are brewing in the Zog financial house.Debt
levels are accelerating at a tremendous pace in America.Citizen debt now
stands at 8 trillion,business debt 7 trillion,government debt 6
trillion.Actual government debt may be closer to 20 trillion when figuring
all liabilities.Links below put all debt in America at 30 trillion.Then we
come to derivative debt--52 trillion and rising fast.JPMorganChase alone has
a derivative exposure of 30 TRILLION DOLLARS.Keep in mind that the total GDP
in 2001 of the entire US economy was only 10 trillion.Eight years ago all
assets for the US {Real Estate, Stocks Etc.} were only valued at 20
trillion.Today total US assets cannot be much more than 25 trillion.So with
every dollar in asset value in the US there are 4 dollars of debt.
Paul Kennedy "Yale Professor of History" wrote an interesting
book a few years ago titled "The Rise And Fall Of The Great Powers." In his
book he went back 500 years of mainly European history and showed how nations
"Empires" rose and fell.The key thesis of his argument is the fact that
Empires become financially and geographically overextended over time and go
heavily into debt trying to stay intact.His book was written before the fall
of the Soviet Union and he predicted its fall as well as the coming collapse
of the American Empire.At least 15 Empires collapsed in the twentieth
century. When the last Denari is gone the Empire will fall.
The US is running a trade deficit of 300 billion dollars.It is also
dependent on a continual supply of borrowed foreign money to stay afloat.In
2003 "because of the budget increase ala 911" it will need a bigger supply of
foreign money than at present.Three of the biggest investors in the US
Economy are the Chinese, Japanese, and Middle East Arabs.Figures for the
first six months of 2001 "last six months figures not yet known" show that
the Japanese pulled out 17 billion from the US.Arabs "worried about Zog
freezing Arab assets" are also pulling money out and investing it in
Switzerland.China is starting to invest in Euros as a hedge against having
all their money tied up in dollars.Japanese citizens are starting to buy
record amounts of gold fearing a total collapse of the Yen.China is rumored
to have recently bought 120 tons of gold by their central bank.As Zog
continues its attack on Islam more Arabs may decide to pull money out of the
US.As Japan continues its collapse they may have no choice but to continue
pulling money out of the US.China does not want Zog in their back yard which
gives them a reason to slow down investing in the US.
Many Contrarian US Economists think the Real Estate bubble as well
as the Dow Stock bubble have yet to collapse.When they do it will take down
US assets perhaps 10 trillion in value.Yet the US debt will not change.They
also predict a collapse of the US dollar.China,Japan,Taiwan,Hong
Kong,Singapore,Malaysia,and Indonesia are all experiencing Deflation.Because
China is becoming the primary manufaturing center on Earth "HUGE CHEAP LABOR
FORCE" the Deflation trend is going to continue.The US is experiencing
Disinflation.Deflation may very well come to the US soon--It is already here
in some cases.With Deflation and an asset collapse Zog will go bankrupt.
The 911 attack "according to Zogs own calculations" is going to
cost 1 trillion dollars.Zog, "IN HIS BLOODLUST," has decided to make the
entire world his Lebanon.The next attack may not even come from Islam it may
come from South America--Bush 2 is upping the money and weapons "as well as
military advisors" to Columbia so it can attack FARC, the guerilla insurgency
there.Wonder if Bush 2 will have as much luck stopping a hit squad from FARC
entering the US as he does keeping out wetbacks.The next attack from wherever
it comes may cost the US 2 -4 trillion dollars.Without another attack Zog is
headed for bankruptcy--With another attack he is headed for a total collapse.
Scot--We live in interesting times--Links Our Crushing Public
Debt
JPM Derivatives Monster Grows
http://www.fmcenter.org/pdf/flow09-01nocov.pdf
Good Contrarian financial info here-- Beartopia's News & Commentary
======================================
Subject: Whence originated the six million claim?
Alex,
I saw a recent letter posted asserting that "The Figure of Six Million Jews
Killed Was Invented By Soviet Propagandist Ilya Ehrenberg." This is probably
not true even in the context of WWJew, though Ehrenburgh certainly did use
it, as did Lavrenti Beria. The figure of 6 dead MegaKikes (MK) certainly was
used WELL before WWJew even erupted.
The most concrete example of pre WWJew 6 MK mythology can be found at Greg
Raven's website at :
http://www.corax.org/revisionism/documents/191031crucifixion.html
There has been mention of Max Nordau saying something like "6 million jews
will have to die before the State of Israel is established." circa 1913 but I
can't pin this one down right now. Still, the Glynn article should suffice
to show that the 6 dead MK figure was seeping up from the cesspit of the
collective jewish mind for some time, and certainly has no basis in fact.
Best Regards,
Gerald Morris
Ed. Note: Thanks. I have heard that similar claims were advanced either before or after WWI. Apparently 6 and 6 million figure prominently in the nutty numerology of the kabbalah, so beloved of deep thinkers like Roseanne Barr. How many Jews were actually killed, I have no idea. That fewer than six million were, I have no doubt. That Jews profit from fake-atrocitymongering is established fact.
======================================
Subject: "Hate" crimes law in New Zealand
http://www.stuff.co.nz/inl/index/0,1008,1100409a10,FF.html
There are certain things that frighten me when I hear this talk of "hate crimes." The first of these things is that it is punishing the culprit for having a feeling - "hate" - perhaps a motive nonetheless, but that motive over other motives which lead one to commit the same crime. The second of them, is exactly what is "hate" - and moreover who shall be the arbiter of what "hate" is, and whether one has had a hateful thought, or not?
In reality, let us drop the noble pretenses of "fighting hate", for the only type of "hate" the Hon. Ms. Clark is talking about is when one hates another based on race, or hate for another's sexual fetish, or their religion, and especially where it is a heterosexual White male hating someone who is not. That is, as we all know, far from the extent of what "hate" is, nor what it can be. Should a man break my jaw, say, for a certain T-shirt I wear, a T-shirt he hates, is that also not a crime - and one based on hate? And if a jilted ex-lover should discover I have married another woman, and she tries to shoot us because she hates our happiness together, is that not hate as well? One can punish a motive, certainly; but to standardize the punishment of certain motives as if they were more reprehensible than other motives to the same end, flies in the face of a society where people hold thoughts sacrosanct and alegal. A motive can be demonstrated, a thought can only be assumed at best. And to, as Ms. Clark stated, "..deal with the greatest severity attacks on minority groups" is nothing short of saying that the members of these minority groups deserve more protection under the law than the rest of us. I wonder how she reconciles that notion with the belief in a society equal in the eyes of the law.
We must now ask ourselves; since when did it become a crime in New Zealand to hate someone, whether that hatred be based on their race, their religion, their sexual fetish, or whatever else?
It is imperative that we ask ourselves this question, for when we talk about additional punishment for "hate crimes" we are talking of nothing less than punishing people additionally for a crime, when they commit that crime based on feelings of hatred against someone for the aforementioned factors.
When the government outlaws "hate", then they can have a logical justification for punishing people when they commit two crimes in one (naturally, the "hate" and the "crime"), but as long as it's legal to hate anyone for any reason one chooses, the concept of "hate crimes" is one that stands contrary to logic, contrary to the spirit (the law is not designed to be used in order to punish for thinking certain thoughts, be they "hateful" or else) and contrary to the letter ("hate" is not a crime yet) of the law.
This would be all fine and dandy if it *were* illegal to hate someone because of those things, but that's not reality. We really must ask ourselves exactly what else are they punishing someone for when they increase a particular sentence on hate crime charges. Are they punishing the person for "hate"? That seems to be it.
The fact is that most crimes are based on hate, I suspect there are rather few crimes committed in the name of love for the victim. Perhaps not racial, religious or sexual-fetish hate, but hate nonetheless. Ms. Clark seems to think that the perpetrators of these "hate" crimes are less culpable than if the crimes were based on motives of hate of a race, a religion, or a sexual-fetish. Perhaps one of the professional seat-warmers in Parliament will have the courage to ask why she thinks that the hate of certain things is somehow more reprehensible than the hate of others.
And they also may do well to add that Ms. Clark has not stated how a judge may determine if "hate" was a factor at all, and I doubt she will. This kind of policy sounds like it belonged better in the kangaroo courts of Soviet Russia than those of a supposedly "free" nation like New Zealand. It may be all well and good (should we ignore the illogic and inequality of the principle of this proposed law) to convict a man of a "hate crime" where he admits openly that he attacked another man because of his race, or because of his particular sexual fetish, but in how many cases does this occur. No, rather, obviously there will have to be some kind of arbitration to decide what the man was thinking at the time he committed the crime, and whether that thought was "hateful" or not. This kind of policy now sounds less Soviet and more Orwellian, for even the Soviets didn't go so far as to try and convict someone based upon what they thought he was thinking.
Expect, with the passage of this law, to have houses raided and politically incorrect books, magazines, and computer files seized. A Judge, in trying to determine whether "hate" was a factor, might sentence one as a "hate crime" because a particular man got into a fight with a homosexual and beat him rather badly, but that particular man attends a church where homosexuality is regarded as a sin. The fact that he didn't know the man was a homosexual when the fight occurred cannot be proved, and the "evidence" of a "hateful" motive could then be used to put him in the big house for years. Such is the manner of a system which persecutes its subjects for the things they think.
It's just a step away from doing away with the crime part, and punishing people solely for the "hate" itself. Does the hate not increase the culpability of the crime, they will say, so is it not logical that we should punish the hate, as it is tantamount to conspiracy to commit the crime. If cabinet really wanted to lower the amount of crime, that could easily be achieved by raising sentences across the board, there is no point in going to all this trouble to do something so akin to criminalizing politically incorrect thought.
I can accept punishment for the action, and I can accept additional punishment for a motive, but I cannot for the life of me see why Ms. Clark and her cabinet believes that certain thoughts are more culpable motives than others.
Dale Peterson
======================================
Subject: NPR/vouchers
Alex reNPR again. Today I heard some conservative arguing for school
vouchers and some lib against. The discussion was a pity party over who
cared more about the poor nogs in the inner shitty. They spent an
inordinate amount of time discussing how the feds could keep private schools
from expelling muds and other misfits using the program. I could barely
keep myself from turning the channel but I forced myself to do so, grist for
the mill.
The topic it suggested to me is this: how the republican party and right
wing harm White folk.
1. vouchers are intended to benefit a predominantly nonwhite population.
Bad for us.
2. vouchers increase money spent by the G on schools, thus increasing
taxes. Bad for us.
3. vouchers will introduce large numbers of nogs and other mud into mostly
White private and parochial schools. Bad for us.
4. vouchers will give the federal government control over private and
parochial schools. Bad for us.
5. vouchers will put organized churches, especially the current Roman
Church, deeper into the pocket of the feds, and so even more timid and
traitorous of the interests of its core constituency-- Whites.
Who pushes this program that is bad for Whites? the GOP.
How the hell can any self respecting White conservative be in favor of this?
I can only guess that they are so befuddled about racial realities that they
have no hope of thinking clearly. If they think this will win nog votes,
they are just plain stupid.
A strange example of how the dual party system in this country is strangling
our Race. The current arrangements are NOT LEGITIMATE and we should not
fool ourselves into ever wasting time hoping that this system will allow us
to adequately protect ourselves. The Federal elections are a sham.
======================================
Subject: Profiling, Bennett, etc.
Alex sorry about that last email, I started a thought about npr and didnt
finish it. I think the point was just that the beast will have a very hard
time defending itself against the current assailants without using racial
profiling. What the jews are concerned about is really not about
establishing legal precedent for race discrim by the Govt, but rather the
legitimating effect this will have on the general population. They had the
government in hand long ago, but this is what all their efforts at
"eradicating racism" are aimed at. That is, making everyone ELSE besides
jews blind to the facts of race, thus giving them a permanent competitive
social and political advantage in every arena.
On to my next topic. I was looking at KAS' website and followed a link to a
different site entitled "racerealist." This is a guy who suggests EB is
some kind of Max Headroom, made up persona. I wont say anything against
this fellow as I think that it is good to have a range of media and
promotional efforts for the White Cause even if some are semitically correct
like Pat B. or just blight wing cynics. Successful yellow revolutionary
Mao said "let a thousand flowers bloom." Save only that this sniping is
incorrect and non-productive.
Even if EB were a fictitious persona, whomever is making her up is pretty
damn knowledgeable about human nature and I for one look forward to more
regardless of the mouthpiece. This series has been useful in my
relationship with my lovely wife. Further, I have introduced it to two
non-racialist buddies who have been getting a kick out of it-- and logging
onto VNN. Purpose served.
Secondly, this guy is criticizing York rally. These criticism are wrong.
Let me for one say that I dont like rallies as they have been practiced by
the KKK in the past twenty years. IE, they make racists look weak, stupid,
and in need of police protection. And also are rumored to be mostly
attended by Govt informants. That I find to be not helpful in the cause of
White Liberation. THis type of thing is a shame to the memory of NBForrest,
whom was feared and respected, not laughed at. I always felt this way, and
Metzger has expressed this view better than I have.
>From the press on York however, I am very happy and impressed both with the
numbers, the organizational coordination, the press coverage in and out of
the movement, and most of all with the way the Pro White demonstators kicked
ass on the garbage. That, my friends, displays strength. Strength is
feared and admired and remember, people want to run with a winning horse.
Thus, York is the kind of rally that all of us should applaud and support as
we are able. Furthermore, the recent NA rallies in front of the Israeli
embassy were impressive as well if for no other reason than sheer audacity.
Thanks again to all the organizers and attendants of these rallies. Hail
Victory!
======================================
Subject: Institutional imaginary racism
See here below (URL) a professional race-agitator crying about "institutionalized (White) racism"
in our schools.
This, she says, is the reason minorities do not succeed. Race has zip to do with
anything, she claims. She travels around giving happy little lectures on the evils of White school rule.
How can such school racism exist, I ask, when thousands of almost-Marxists and anti-racists now
run our public schools and colleges? How can there be such racism as a result?
Exactly. There isn't any. These Stalinesque people simply need to keep their race-baiting gravy-train
going at full steam, lest a few White people wake up to what is really happening. Note her mind-numbing wording
and phrasing--she's been reading Soviet handbooks from 1930.
And, if you complain, you are a "hater." What a swindle.
http://www.azstarnet.com/star/today/20211sleeter.html
JC
======================================
Subject: More writing letters
As an example of the power of writing good letters to the advertisers in publications and television shows, the "Married With Children" case is a good example. In 1988, a housewife from Michigan, Terry Rakolta, send one typewritten letter to all of the sponsors of the show, expressing her outrage over the content. One account of this incident had this to say:
"After she saw The Bra Show, Rakolta dutifully took notes on subsequent appalling episodes. Then she wrote a letter and mailed it to 45 of the show's advertisers, whom she accused of "helping to feed our kids a steady diet of gratuitous sex and violence." She got headlines, a talk-show tour, 15 minutes of fame. And she cost the show one sponsor, Tambrands, the makers of Tampax tampons. Fox's reaction? "Everybody did the manly thing," says Moye, "which was immediately dive behind desks and point fingers at us. You couldn't get your legs under a desk for all the executives under there. You have never seen such wussing. And we're going, 'One letter? One letter?' I mean, this is an example of what a bored housewife can do with her husband's computer.
That one letter was taken to heart at Fox and Columbia, says Garth Ancier, because it was "intelligently written." It was "type-written." It was "well thought out." And it could cost them big bucks. A 30-second commercial on Married now [in 1989] sells for about $200,000. That's nearly five times what it cost when the series debuted, and more than twice the price for commercial time on Fox's less popular shows. "Advertisers pay attention to people who write intelligently and thoughtfully."
From here: http://www.bundyology.com/hanging.html (halfway down page)
To effectively alter newspaper, magazine and television content, we need to start sending our letters to the advertisers, and they need to be typed out, printed, and mailed. A 'letter' sent over the computer is ok, but can be too easily deleted at the touch of a key, and they are not likely to be printed out and passed around an advertisers boardroom... whereas an intelligent, well thought-out letter will be. This is how the Jews silence any media organs that they don't own outright. We have to start copying their tactics. Letters sent by members of pro-White groups should NOT include the group name, because advertisers are more apt to dismiss a bunch of letters that are part of one concerted effort, whereas a bunch of individual letters, all apparently unrelated, is much more powerful and worrisome. The letters should just harp on the anti-white 'racist' aspect of the show or publication, and stay away from anything that can cause the writer to be labelled a 'hater'.
I'm hoping you guys can help get the word out to those of our people who write a lot of letters.
Erik D.
======================================
Subject: Writing letters
There has been some debate over the effectiveness of writing letters to the editors of various anti-White newspapers. Assuming that many people are going to continue to do this, we may as well take the time to insure that the efforts reap maximum benefit.
The one mistake we in the White Nationalist movement make, is that, although we write letters to the editors of various newspapers, the REAL power is in sending well-written and well-thought out letters to the newspapers or tv shows ADVERTISERS. The Letters to the Editor section in the local paper is a blowoff valve to make the most outraged and well-spoken readers think the Editors care about their opinion. They don't. The only thing the editors and owners care about in the big picture is money, and that comes almost solely from the advertising. If our people would start sending carbon copies of all of our letters to the publications or shows ADVERTISERS, we would likely have a much bigger effect.
I was hoping you gentlemen might be able to use your influence to draw this tactic to our peoples attention.
Erik D.
======================================
Subject: Holyhoax
http://holywar.org/HOLOHOAX.htm
The satirical journal, Tales of the Holohoax, written to attract
children and counter the barrage of lies taught them in ZOG schools by
the NEA, has been meticulously re-designed and posted on the web by
HolyWar.org. All statements are footnoted at the end of the comic book.
Script by Michael Hoffman II, illustrated by A. Wyatt Mann.
Log on and revel in its simple truths.
Please spread far & wide. Thanks.
Tripp
There is ONLY ONE solution to the jewist problem.
In compliance with ZOG Regulations, this e-mail is Certified Anthrax
Free. U-Parve kosher tax 5c paid.
"From the Chronicles of . . . . . .The Holy Grail"
======================================
Subject: Dallas
Alex re Dallas. We've been through there quite a bit. I know for a fact
they have a "large Jewish community," ie, verminious infestation. The
newspapers know it too, and theyre boosting circulation among this
"important demographic." Like their kike-fellows, they tend to care more
about Israel than the chaos theyve created in their own backyard by
importing third world mud from all corners of the globe. Hopefully it will
bite them in the ass and hard.
In fact we recently had to fly through DFW and I was wondering if, post 911,
the normal contingent of dot-Indians and Nigerians would be searching bags
again. Those Nigerians tend to be so dark theyre what american niggers call
"blue-blacks." I think they tend to be skinnier than american nogs and also
prefer close cropped hair, which puts the enhanced monkey-shape of their
heads on display.
Well of course we only went through one checkpoint, but it appeared most of
the dots/paks were gone but the blue-blacks were still there. Except now
they had mostly young white men and a few mestizos with M16s watching them.
One monkey was watching the xray screen, and the soldier was watching the
monkey. It was bizarre to say the least.
I wonder how the look from the ground will change if at all once this is
federalized. Maybe they'll have to administer a civil service exam and so
at least get a bunch of apes who can read.
NPR this morning a bunch of legal-Jews were yammering to and fro about
racial profiling. Theyre apparently trying to reconcile the need for zog to
defend itself with the propaganda problem of screening out a population of
suspects that is decidedly non-white.
======================================
Subject: "The Descent of Dan"
This story is hysterically funny and sad at the same time. It is scary to me that intelligent people are such lemmings that they follow the "politically correct" even when it is ludicrous to do so.
I fear for our country and our people, when so many are just like this Dan -- following what is hip and trendy when it is obviously so wrong. The only thing missing in this story is the fact that the Jews are who pounds this one world order thing into us with the media sledgehammer. God help white people everywhere!
Aerowigs@aol.com
======================================
Subject: What Israel costs us
This article clearly counts out the costs of funding Israel to the American
taxpayer (there are other good pieces on the page).
Does your government finance you to the tune of $23K per year, White man? As
VNN correctly notes, one standard for Hyman, one for everyone else.
Thttp://www.wrmea.com/html/us_aid_to_israel.htm#T
The Metal Warrior
======================================
Subject: NA Rally in Gainesville
National Alliance Rally in Florida
February 15th and 16th, 2002
**************************************************************
The Gainesville, Florida Proto-Unit of the National Alliance
will be sponsoring a counter-demonstration against anti-White
demonstrators and the N.A.A.C.P. in Lake City, Florida this weekend!
National Alliance members from throughout
the southeastern U.S. will be attending and participating.
We will be attending a flag raising near White
Springs, Florida where the Sons of Confederate
Veterans will be raising a 20'x40' Confederate Battle
Flag 19 feet off of I-75! The flag will be honored by
a 21 gun salute. This event will be at 2:00pm at the
Farmers Market, near the White Springs exit on State
Route 136. After the flag raising we will be meeting and
camping near Newberry, Florida. Saturday we will be passing out flyers to people
attending the annual "Battle of Olustee" parade. The
jewish-founded N.A.A.C.P. will be there protesting the use of a
Confederate Flag in the City's logo. Our goal is to
"blanket" the parade watchers with our message.
Remember: If the White Union soldiers could have seen what
America was going to become, they would have been flying the Rebel flag, too!
For more details or directions contact: Gainesville National Alliance Proto-Unit Coordinator Brad Forbes
(352)472-4242 or (352)318-7005 numeric pager
======================================
Subject: Jews hate White nationalism
WHY AMERICA DIES FROM WITHIN.
Nation: birth, race, family. A non-Jewish nationality.
WEBSTER'S NEW COLLEGIATE DICTIONARY, 1977.
Nationalism is an infantile disease.
ALBERT EINSTEIN, JEW, Princeton Univ.
I believe national pride is nonsense.
BERNARD BARUCH, JEW, War-maker, Banker, Advisor to Presidents.
Nationalism is a danger for the Jewish people. Today, as in all epochs of history, it is proven that Jews cannot live in powerful states
where a high national culture has developed.
THE JEWISH SENTINEL, Chicago, 9-24-36
We seek diversity first; then miscegenation of the races.
COMMENTARY MAGAZINE, Norman Podhoretz, JEW
The fiction of national sovereignty is no longer compatible with reality.
ZBIGIEW BRZEZINSKY, Marxist, CFR/TRI; Nat'l Security Advisor to Jimmy "The Rabbit" Carter
General de Gaulle could not understand AMERICA'S (JEWS) conviction of the obsolescence of the nation-state.
HENRY KISSINGER, JEW, "The White House Years".
HOW DIFFERENTLY JEWS VIEW "PATRIOTISM" WHEN AMERICANS ARE ASKED TO FIGHTANOTHER JEW INSPIRED WAR!
REMEMBER THE USS LIBERTY !
======================================
Subject: More Kievsky, and Bruer
I just listened to the tail end of an NPR program "On Point" with Pat
Buchanan, and listened to the Jew host and the Jew Jack Beatty making fun of
Pat and of Pat's thesis.
Pat understands that the race issue IS the ultimate issue, but he made a
heroic attempt to make it palatable to the kikes. This is fine, because it
serves a certain purpose -- it proves that being anything to the left of
Hitler will get you NOWHERE, EVER. The Jews will simply laugh at you.
I got to tell you Pat, I get a better response from the Jews than you do.
The Jews just laugh at you, and sneer with their self righteous,
intellectually superior attitudes. By contrast, I go into their forums and
I get in their face and I tell the unpleasant truths that they would rather
were not publicized, like the fact that only 4 Israelis died in the World
Trade Center attacks. I don't care what they call me -- Nazi, racist,
fascist, and I don't care if I am socially ostracized. I've had enough of
them and their comfortable, snide attitudes towards their gracious
osts( the White Gentiles). The free ride is over, Jews, the Party is coming
to a close, and pretty soon you Jews will have to fend for yourselves. I
heard you deny the existence of White people on NPR just now, saying that
"the category of White people is something that people in the White racists
in the 18th century came up with."
First of all, I think you meant the 19th century. The 18th century was the
1700's. You Jews, despite the fact that you control the universities now,
are awfully intellectually sloppy. Second, those "White racists in the 19th
century" built the civilization that you are now getting fat on.
I'm so sick of you self-satisfied, blood-sated parasitical Jew bastards.
You think you are so tough just because you control almost all the forums
(except the Internet). I was so angry at how you treated Pat. I think this
is a good time to reprint a Grant Bruer classic, "Thank God They're Stupid."
THANK GOD THEY'RE STUPID
Many times I've thought to myself, "If the ZOG were
to play it just a little bit smarter, we wouldn't have
a prayer of winning." However, they never seem to
learn from history, and I hope to live long enough to
see them repeat it. I no longer worry that the
hopefully soon-to-be-oven-fodder Yids and their
Lamp-Post ornament "white" friends, will "get a clue",
and thereby avoid their comeuppance. It would seem,
judging by some of their recent actions, that these
murdering, thieving, cretins seem to relish the
thought of being put through their paces by legions,
of the likes of me.
We are so lucky, that on a subconscious level, kikes
and their fellow travellers, seem to desire
extermination. I have often been amazed at some of the
unintentionally helpful things that the system has done
for the White Racist cause. I cannot count the number
of times that I have "armchair-quarterbacked" these
morons,and wondered at their shortsightedness and
all-round childishness. For the life of me, I can't
figure out why they literally NEVER throw the "rubes"
a bone, once in a while. I am most appreciative of the
fact that they do not, however.
At the bottom of the page, I provide a couple of
examples of where the ZOGites truly fumbled the ball.
Instead of placating millions of temporarily alarmed
white sheeple, by letting the dolts think they had
"won one" for a change, the ZOGites did what their
predecessors did before them, which, by the way,
always led to them getting their foul backsides kicked
hard, and that is the indulging of their infantile
compulsion to "lord it over" their subjects and rub
their faces in the muck of their creation. This has
been the undoing of many a "peace-loving" jewish
community, in the past. You would think it would
suffice to have the power and control all to one's own
group, wouldn't you? Isn't it hard to relate to fools
that can't help but poke a stick at their prey, until
their intended food, fights back?
#1- Cincinnati, Ohio: After a week of niggers behaving
as niggers (ie, rioting, raping and 10 on 1 beatings),
the local prosecutor's office has filed it's first
"hate crime" charges! After 182 nigger assaults of
white people, who do you suppose was charged? A WHITE
MAN who threw a brick at a congoid's windshield while
daring to call the nigger a nigger! Thanks guys! We
couldn't have asked for a better piece of propaganda!
Even some of the drooling drones might wipe the saliva
from their chins, and actually DO something!
#2- Top Clinton Administration Criminals get a walk:
This really said it all, to me. The morons that are
running this poorly-scripted show are clearly, NEVER
going to wise up. Imagine how far it would have gone
to dissipate the growing anger in White America, if
the Imperial Corporate Regime were to have served up a
handful of it's sloppier servants, such as the
repulsive dyke, Reno and a few other highly
dispensable cruds. Those out there, who don't "get it"
yet, would have been fooled into believing that the
"guys in the white hats" were cleaning up "their"
government. The CONservatives would have rejoiced! "We
the people" would have become something other than the
punchline of a growing number of jokes. But, it wasn't
to be. They instead held their laughable "Danforth
Hearings", and of course, found that nothing untoward
had happened in Waco. Clinton was held to account for
nothing and will probably be a major part of "our"
PUBIC life for decades to come. Again, thanks guys! We
Revolutionaries couldn't do it without you!
--Grant Bruer
======================================
Subject: Kievsky on Chafetz on Buchanan
Josh Chafetz? I play violin and have an ear for foreign languages, so that
name rings a bell. I wonder if Mr. Chafetz is a relation of the violinist
Jascha Heifetz, which is of course just another version of Josh Chafetz. If
Mr. Chafetz reads this, please do let us know if you are a relation of the
violinist, or if you were named after him.
Anyway, he's clearly a Jew. And he uses Jewish intellectual tactics. Let's
take this paragraph about the Frankfurt School (a group of Communist Jews).
"The theorists of the Frankfurt School believed, rightly, that the West
would never accept communism as long as it held to its Western cultural
heritage. So they set about trying to overturn that heritage through what
came to be known as "Critical Theory," which involved showing that every
institution of Western civilization is grounded in oppression, with the
obvious conclusion being that these institutions should be overthrown."
But Mr. Chafetz then goes back into rehashing Buchanan's view. He doesn't
say if the Frankfurt School of Communist Jews was in fact a bad influence on
America. It's like a sleight of hand, "Well look at this, oops, now look at
this." And he hopes that the television conditioned Americans will accept
this abrupt change of topic without missing a beat.
Well I don't accept it, Josh Chafetz. You are writing for a supposedly
"conservative" magazine, but the overall tone of your article is that of a
triumphant grandson of the Frankfurt school celebrating his victory over
real, White Christian American conservatism.
The sleight of hand you displayed in this article is a microcosm of how you
"won" your culture war against the naive, White Gentile American people.
You basically distracted us long enough to sneak in your agenda, and you
used our good will to silence our protests by demonizing your opposition as
"racists," (we were all racists and we built the civilization you parasite
off of, you filthy kike) and "akin to Nazis" (we only fought them because of
your same "sleight of hand" tricks, and our people have the wrong idea about
the Nazis because of your tribe's control of our media). It was a big
mistake to pull your Jewish fat out of the fire -- look how you thanked us
http://www.ilovewhitefolks.com/WWII.html
In short, Josh, you are smugly celebrating your triumphs for what amounts to
tricking a toddler out of it's candy. The American people were a settler
people who'd struggled and survived, and had a very naive and generous
spirit as a result. They thought this way, "It was such a struggle for us,
we want to help the newcomers (jewcomers)." Big mistake!
Your people took advantage of our generosity, so much advantage. We fought
wars, lost millions of soldiers for your Jew instigated
wars.
But that was back when we were young and strong, we had a segregated, White
nation, a sense of national identity and pride.
Hey kikes, we aren't going to fight your mercenary wars anymore! You got
that? You are on your own! You have fucked us in the ass long enough, and
destroyed our nation and killed our spirit. You have shit where you sleep,
Jews.
Even if we can't take an active revenge against you, filthy kikes, we can
win in the end by simply refusing to fight Jew Wars. And when we don't
fight Jew Wars anymore, guess what? It's "the Holocaust" by default. No
matter what you lose, Josh. The Gentile world is a hell of a lot more
numerous than you Chosen swine, and you can't fool all of the people, all of
the time. We can destroy you simply by refusing to protect you and fight
for you. You think you are so smart and evolutionarily sound because you
fooled a bunch of naive settler people, but those days are over, Jews. This
is your day in the sun Jews, and 2002 is the twilight. Enjoy it while it
lasts, because it's just about over.
Andrei Kievsky
======================================
Subject: Utah
We went skiing in Park City a few years ago. Nice place, way better than
Colorado. Less people, nicer slopes, drier snow-- a particular pleasure
when one learned to ski in Michigan. Had some hearty food at the "Stein
Erikson" lodge halfway up the mountain. Also had a "seafood buffet" at the
main lodge in the ski resort that had everything from pickled herring to
crustaceans and back to sashimi. Had the best Chilean Sea Bass ever before
and ever since.
As I recall there were very few mud about. So I was puzzled when I heard
they were going to stage the Olympics. Then I remembered the formula. The
nicest places are the whitest places. And so, the people who control the
whitest nicest places can easily make a buck by inviting the whole world to
come stay for a spell. And then those elites, once they've made a buck
ruining a good thing, can go live somewhere else. I guess white elites have
learned quite a bit from jews, that used to be their pattern not ours. And
even in places like Utah, usually there's a few jews in the woodpile
whispering in the ears of the traitorous white elites, making "commissions"
and maybe procuring a few levinsky/levy types as goy elite entertainment.
Sure the mormons have the goofiest species of christianity we've ever heard
of. Attribute instead the qualities of Utah to the what happens when you
put Whites into a free living space of their own. Attribute the sellout to
the moral, cultural and racial rot that allows the jew to do his thing, and
white traitors to enrich themselves along the way. Mormonism is neither the
symptom or the cure, but a specious distraction from the objective of White
Self Determination.
======================================
Subject: Weekly Standard on Buchanan
Looking Backward
Pat Buchanan's world.
by Josh Chafetz
Weekly Standard 2.2.18
The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and
Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization
by Patrick J. Buchanan
Dunne, 320 pp., $25.95
Pat Buchanan's thesis in "The Death of the West" is
simple enough: The "cultural revolution" that swept
across the West in the 1960s led to wide-spread
libertinism, one consequence of which has been a drastic
lowering of the birthrate in Western societies. As a
result, the United States and Europe face a stark choice:
We can either allow our populations to dwindle away, or
we can surrender to the invading hordes of immigrants
from the rest of the world and wind up living in a "Third
World America." Either way, Western civilization dies.
Buchanan is surely right that the second half of the
twentieth century was not particularly good for Western
culture. Allan Bloom made the point brilliantly in his
classic "The Closing of the American Mind." But Buchanan
forgoes an intelligent and subtle analysis in favor of a
simple and superficial one. In his view, the problems all
began with (naturally) a group of foreigners--the
cultural Marxists of the Frankfurt School, many of whom
fled to America in the mid-1930s.
The theorists of the Frankfurt School believed, rightly,
that the West would never accept communism as long as it
held to its Western cultural heritage. So they set about
trying to overturn that heritage through what came to be
known as "Critical Theory," which involved showing that
every institution of Western civilization is grounded in
oppression, with the obvious conclusion being that these
institutions should be overthrown.
As Buchanan sees it, the most baleful influence of this
theory was on women's sexual mores. In fact, Buchanan
places almost all the blame for the West's declining
population squarely on women. "German women are refusing
to have children," he writes, and "European women
consider [their] personal desires to be far more
compelling than demographic studies describing what
Europe will look like when they are seventy or eighty."
TO PROVE that declining birthrates are linked to the
cultural revolution, Buchanan quotes from admittedly
outrageous denunciations of Western culture from Susan
Sontag, Catharine MacKinnon, and the 1973 "Humanist
Manifesto"--which leaves the reader with a curious
juxtaposition: Sontag's impassioned insistence that evil
right-wingers like Buchanan run the world, and Buchanan's
equally impassioned assertion that evil militant
liberationists like Sontag are in control.
Buchanan's heavy-handed cultural commentary forces him to
insist that nearly every change in the last fifty years
has been bad. His populist economics and cultural
pessimism combine to produce such claims as "When the
income tax rate for the wealthiest was above 90 percent
in the 1950s, America, by every moral and social
indicator, was a better country." One wonders what that
says about 1950s segregation, but Buchanan glosses over
the entire civil rights movement in two sentences:
"America said yes. Black and white together, America went
out and buried Jim Crow." At the same time, he spends
pages decrying the fact that "America's cultural elite is
almost slavishly on the side of those who wish to
dishonor every banner and disgrace every leader
associated with the Confederate States of America."
Throughout, it is on the issue of race that Buchanan's
book is at its ugliest. His view of Western civilization
is irreducibly racialist. His argument that unchecked
immigration spells the death of Western civilization
makes sense only if he assumes that the assimilation of
new immigrants is impossible. But since America has
always been a land of immigrants, and they have always
assimilated before, he must argue that recent immigrants
are different. And here, he stands on race. In discussing
Great Britain, he approvingly cites Paul Craig Roberts's
statement that "by the end of this century the English
people will be a minority in their homeland." Of course,
what Roberts and Buchanan actually mean is that white
people will be a minority. Britain is becoming what
America has always been: a land of immigrants--a fact
which then foreign secretary Robin Cook recognized last
year when he declared that chicken tikka masala is
"Britain's true national dish." Just as Americans
nolonger think of Italian food as foreign or of Americans
of Italian descent as foreigners, so too many Britons of
Indian descent are becoming assimilated citizens.
Buchanan's reply is that Italians are white, while
Indians are not. And, to Buchanan, "History and
experience teach us that different races are far more
difficult to assimilate." History teaches no such thing.
As Ian F. Haney Lopez demonstrated in his 1996 "White By
Law," what history actually teaches is that groups not
originally considered white come to be thought white
precisely as they are assimilated. Italians, Greeks,
Slavs, Jews, and many other groups were long declared
non-white in American society. Today we can have a bagel
for lunch and lasagna for dinner without ever thinking we
are eating ethnic foods.
Against this, Buchanan suggests that the new waves of
immigrants don't want to assimilate: "Mexican Americans
are creating an Hispanic culture separate and apart from
America's larger culture. They are becoming a nation
within a nation." Leaving aside the obvious point that
first-generation immigrants in earlier waves were at
least as ghettoized, it is not even clear that Buchanan
is right about this. He argues that Hispanics vote
increasingly as a bloc. The falsity of the claim is
demonstrated by numbers Buchanan himself cites earlier in
the book, showing that George W. Bush got 35 percent of
the Hispanic vote in 2000, while Bob Dole got only 21
percent in 1996. In New York's recent mayoral election,
Republican Michael Bloomberg received 47 percent of the
Hispanic vote in his victory over Mark Green. What bloc?
ONCE upon a time, Buchanan was a sharp journalistic
writer, which makes it odd that "The Death of the West"
is so gracelessly written. The prose is both labored
("Like colon cancer, the long-term threat to the West
lies deep within") and clich ridden ("And we cannot go
gentle into that good night"). The real problem, however,
is that it profoundly misunderstands the civilization
whose eulogy it gives. Yes, religion and traditional
morality are components of Western civilization. But
that's true of every civilization. One of the things that
makes Western civilization unique is how it deals with
newcomers to its shores. We may not be assimilating
immigrants as well as we used to, and we should do
better, but ceasing to accept them--that would be the
death of the West.
Josh Chafetz, an American Rhodes Scholar, is a graduate
student in politics at Merton College, Oxford.
======================================
Subject:
Hi Alex,
There is a black NAACP guy on the radio here in the Twin Cities every Sunday. Yesterday, he was talking about black on black crime in the Twin Cities and why no one was demonstrating in the streets about it etc. He portrayed young black males as victims of poverty, no father, the drug war, white racism etc, etc. etc. He then said something that astounded me. He said and I quote "skin color has nothing to do with behavior". Oh contraire! Skin color is like the magician who pulls a scarf out of his shirt and then more and more scarf's keep coming out. There are many more differences in race than skin color. Look at Africa and see their behavior in their native lands. I have lived in the same apartment buildings with these people. Please don't give me this bullshit that blacks don't behave differently than whites. I just had to blow off a little steam after hearing this.
Peace
Maynard
Ed. Note: Skin color's the visible symbol of a host of profound differences. Nobody is hated literally for the color of his skin.
======================================
Subject: Skier Street
US Women's Olympic skier Picabo Street might be better
named "Jigaboo Street"; her boyfriend, former Stanford
running back J J Lasley, is black.
The reference is toward the end of the article, the
paragraph begins with "While Street went back to Log
Haven".
Here.
======================================
Subject:
National Alliance Reports Record Traffic To Website
Nearly 50,000 Visit In Peak Day, Averages Up 150%
LSN Staff
Hillsboro, West Virginia -- The National Alliance reported today in a press statement that traffic to its
website and interest in its group continued to grow in the first month of
January, with its website http://www.natvan.com receiving 48,000 unique
visitors the day after their rally in York Pennsylvania.
According to the statement, the website is receiving an average of more than
28,000 visitors a day, nearly 133% of the elevated traffic it was receiving
after the September 11 bombing.
National Alliance membership director Billy Roper told his membership list
today that:
"Usually, the busiest day of the week for the website is on Saturday, when the
new American Dissident Voices programs are posted, rather than on Sunday ...
We know that the majority of these visits are from new people, with whom we
have had no previous contact. ... As we continue to successfully reach out to
more and more of our people, a larger and larger percentage of them will
become awakened to our message. Let's keep up the momentum ..."
======================================
Subject: Peanut butter
Dear VNN & White Night,
Thanks, White Night, for clarifying the peanut butter point and for providing a good link. Hopefully the discovery that peanut butter, too, eluded African ingenuity won't further crush the self-esteem of the occassional nog that crosses VNN.
What's funny is that when I wrote "peanut butter as a crowning achievement", though I was referencing the (untrue) claim that it was invented by George Washington Carver, a black man, I was actually thinking about Eddie Murphy.
One of the best SNL sketches ever was the Eddie Murphy spoof of Black History month in which he tells the little known--because suppressed by Whitey--story of how two White men stole Carver's invention. He was dressed like an academic in African garb, had a goofy-ass postfacto African name, and told the story with that Angela Davis/Al Sharpton-esque surly seriousness we've all come to know and love. He was mocking this idiocy, which is why it was hilarious, but the story he told was funny as hell too. It went something like this:
Washington Carver was an inventor determined to make a phonograph needle out of a peanut instead of a diamond. One day, he had two white friends over for dinner. They noticed he was putting something strange on his bread instead of butter. "Say, George, what's that you're putting on your bread?" they asked. "Oh," George replied, "this is just a butter substitute I made out of peanuts. I can't digest all that animal fat, you know." These two white men--Jeffrey "Jiff" Jefferson and Stan "Skippy" Williamson--STOLE that recipe and went on to amass great fortunes selling peanut butter to millions of Americans. Meanwhile, "George Washington Carver died penniless and insane, still trying to play a phonograph record with a peanut."
HA! HA! I haven't seen that sketch for probably 15 years, but it's seared into my brain. Some of the details I sketched may be off, but the basics are there and the punchline, to me, is as funny today as it was then. Again, what's great about it is that it mocks black history month, the scholars who take it so seriously and construct wild conspiracy stories that reveal black culture was behind even the most irrelevant "achievements", the stupid retro-afro name changes, booga-boo attire, etc. Though my reference to peanut butter in the "Quid Pro No?" essay was serious and dry, it hid within it my own personal inside joke. Thanks for giving me a chance to share it with you.
Surely a bunch of folks out there remember the sketch I'm talking about, eh?
Victor Wolzek
wolzek@hotmail.com
2/10/02
======================================
Subject: Hoffmann book
The Figure of Six Million Jews Killed Was Invented By Soviet Propagandist
Ilya Ehrenberg
And It Has No Basis In Actual Factual Reporting, Book Claims
Exerpts From "Stalin's War Of Extermination" by Joachim Hoffmann
Book Excerpts -- [The following are excerpts from the book "Stalin's War
Of Extermination" by
Joachim Hoffmann:
LSN comments are in brackets
page 186 - 190
Although ... a total number of six million death victims is still believed
to
represent the expression of an indisputable historical fact -- an
established
axiom today -- the question then arises as to when, and where, the six
million
figure originated and on what it is based. Courts in the Federal Republic
of
Germany regularly indict and prosecute the expression of doubt as to the
accuracy of this number on the grounds of "denial", which is a
misconception.
What is involved is a clear inability to believe. If asked about the
origins
of these figures, however, the courts are unable to give an answer. A few
remarks in this reagrd are therefore called for.
..
If we assume that the six million figure, which was to acquire
imperishable
historical political power, only reached the Americans in the spring of
1945,
it is in any event strange that the Soviet foreign propaganda was already
using the six million figure months before. Exactly five weeks before the
liberation of the Auschwitz concentration camp with its alleged five
million
victims [debunked down to no more than 711,00 in a preceding paragraph],
the
weekly newspaper Soviet War News, published by the Soviet embassy on
December
22, 1944 [World War started in 1939 and ended in 1945], headlined in an
article by leading Soviet propagandist Ilya Ehrenburg [who was debunked as
a
liar and a racist in the preceding chapter]: "Remember, remember,
remember"
[and never forget :p]. In it, the following was reported, apparently with
the
greatest naturalness:
"In regions they seized, the Germans killed all the Jews, from the old
folks
to infants in arms. Ask any German prisoner why his fellow countrymen
annihilated six million people, and he will reply quite simply, 'Why, they
were Jews.'"
This article by Ehrenburg was reprinted on January 4, 1945, i.e.
twenty-three
days before the liberation of Auschwitz, under the headline "Once Again --
Remember!" [and never forget :p] in the Soviet War News weekly, with the
same
passage word for word.
As early as October 5, 1944 Ehrenburg inserted his claims into another
article
in Soviet War News: "They [the Germans]" he wrote, "made no attempt to
disguise their acts in Poland, as they installed 'extermination camps' in
Maidanek (sic), Sabibur (sic), Bolzyce (sic) and Treblinka and slaughtered
millions, I repeat, millions of defenseless people." In using the related
propaganda claim that remains commonplace to the present day, he added
significantly: "If the Germans killed millions of Jews, then the fact
that
these were Jews is only of importance to 'racists'. For human beings, it
is
of importance that these victims were human beings." The slanderous
conclusion then ran: "Hundreds of thousands (of Germans) are guilty of
crimes
and millions of complicity."
The six-million figure, stated exactly for the first time by Ehrenburg in
the
Soviet War News on December 22, 1944, at first inconspicuously, and then
repeated by him once again on January 4, 1945, in the same Soviet
propaganda
newspaper, then appeared in March 15, 1945, in another article by
Ehrenburg in
the Soviet War News weekly under the headline "Wolves They Were -- Wolves
They
Remain" -- in bold print, as a fact no longer disputed by anyone.
Although
the total number of victims, according to the Soviet Press on March 1,
1945,
had been increaded by another five million to a new total of eleven
million,
Ehrenburg, unmoved by this, wrote on March 15, 1945: "the wold now knows
tht
Germany has killed six million Jews," a claim of which the world knew
absolutely nothing at that time.
The stereotypical repetition of a total figure of six million murder
victims,
already claimed with precise clarity on December 22, 1944 -- and this in
the
propaganda newspaper Soviet War News, intended for English-speaking
readers --
gives rise to the conclusion that the six-million figure, just like the
Auschiwtz figure of MAy 7, 1945, is a product of Soviet propaganda,
intended
to influence and indoctrinate public opinion, particularly, the thinking
of
the Anglo-Saxon countries. The evidence, from Soviet War News of December
22,
1941, January 4, 1945, and March 15, 1945, that it was Ehrenberg who
introduced the six-million figure in the Soviet war propaganda, is not
without
iportance to scientific discussion of this emotionally charged topic.
======================================
Subject: Liberty
Tsun,
Nice piece.
Whether these gentlemen choose to distance themselves or not from other
patriotic white Americans who are also hated by Zionists is irrelevant. The
Zionist Lobby will never allow a full Congressional investigation of the
events surrounding the Zionist murders of American servicemen in any event.
The Zionists have successfully obstructed justice over the U.S.S. Liberty
for 35 years already. Just a few more and that event also can be swept
under the carpet of history like tens of millions of white victims of the
Judeo-Bolshevik regime in the 1930s were.
Perhaps someday one or two of these distancers will realize WHY the Zionists
have been able to literally get away with murder.
Best Regards
"Maguire"
======================================
Subject: Microsoft
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/23988.html
The business of Jew owned and managed InterTrust is
suing Microsoft on dubious claims of patent
infringement. But who knows what Judge Goldstein or
Greenberg will decide?
Note that despite Bill Gates' gushy liberalism and
enormous donation to the nigs, the Jews hate him as
much as they hated Walt Disney.
======================================
Subject: Framingham address
Remember, the guy who wrote the smug editorial is named Richard K. Lodge
Letters to the Metrowest News should be signed and no longer than 350 words.
Also include name, address and home phone number. Send to:
Letters to the Editor
Metrowest News
33 New York Avenue
Framingham, MA 01701
======================================
Subject: "Holocaust" hoaxer -- kind of a double cheeseburger
Hi Patriots,
check out the Tuesday, Feb 5 Wall Street Journal, page A16.
There is a new book out, (subject line above) which tells the story of how a
man in Switzerland duped everyone, including Daniel Goldhagen and others at
the US Holocaust Museum into believing he was a Jewish victim of Mengele as
a child.
Turns out it was a total hoax, the guy isn't even a jew.
This is one more example of how the jews will seize on anything to play up
their victim status, and like we've seen, use this generated sentiment to
extort money out of Germany, Switzerland and of course the US.
A good example of why the Holocaust, every aspect, should be scrutinized and
revised as the truth comes out.
God Bless our People,
Loyd
======================================
Subject: "Hate" in Canada report
Check out this report by this punk Matt Lauder:
http://www.track0.com/cc/articles/121801racism.html
======================================
Subject: India
While I may agree with some of your comments, I sincerely argue against your comment about the ÒcivilizationÓ of the Dravidians.
The concept ÒIndiaÓ didnÕt really exist before Aryans invaded it. When they did, they found the land populated by a Negroid race (who are basically Niggers) who worshipped a black god (with the same properties that the ÒgodÓ of African niggers has). The Dravidians didnÕt have anything.
I may agree with your comment on the Chinese (though I would also add Japan to that). It is well known that Aryans had influenced China and to a small extent Japan.
Currently there had been find in the Gobi desert of mummies with red or blonde hair, fair skin, facial structures similar to those of European people, and dressed in clothing that was similar to that that Northern Europeans wore at that time period. The mummies were ancient.
Japan Ð while there are many theories about the origin of the Ainu people, they resemble greatly Aryans. They have fair skin, facial structures similar to that of Aryans. In fact, most of the great Japanese military geniuses of WWII were of Ainu origins.
BtwÉ I had the chance to visit my local Borders (a bookshop), where I picked up the self-biography of Otto Skorzeny (check him outÉ) and a couple of Nordic Roots CDs. While I was sipping coffee and looking at the newspaper shelf, I saw 3 Jewish newspapers. One of them was named ÒYidiotÓ. I am not jokingÉ I think I just came up with a new term for Jews. One can be an idiot and still change, but if one is a yidiot, its for life, since its in the genesÉ :-)
======================================
Subject: One standard for Jews...
Another reason to hate Jews. (Like we need another reason!) From the 1040A Tax Booklet, Page 13.
"Payments to Holocaust Victims. Restitution payments received by holocaust victims or their heirs after 1999 (and certain interest earned on the payments) are not taxable. If you reported these amounts on your 2000 return or used them to compute any amount affecting your 2000 tax liability, you may need to file Form 1040X to amend your 2000 return. For more details, see Pub. 525."
Yet they charge the job-less tax on their unemployment benefits. Holocaust Reparation Payments are bullcrap anyway!
Ed. Note: Gee, it's almost like Jews are a Special brand of people. They're business-class travelers, and we're all in coach. ONE STANDARD FOR JEWS, ANOTHER STANDARD FOR THE REST OF US. THE JEW IS YOUR ENEMY, WHITE MAN.
======================================
Subject: Skippy not fathered by nog
I just read your Black History Month article by
Victor Wolzek. He has given the Blacks too much
credit. I too believed, (Due to elementary school
Black History Month brainwashing drummed into my young
mind) that Carver invented peanut butter but alas,
it's not true. Upon other inventions I researched I
compiled a page
http://www.whiteknight.50megs.com/invention.htm
(my most popular, I might add) at my site to refute
this dogma spewed forth from the Leftists.
An Avid VNN fan,
White Knight
http://www.whiteknight.50megs.com
======================================
Subject: Seth Bekenstein
The American Public Demands that you expose the FACTS regrding the above caption "American" who is under police arrest in California for funding child-pornograph, White-slavery and murder.
Also, the time is long over-due to strip the mask away from the so-called "Russian Mafia," which , in reality, is a JEW crime-ring that permeates the US government, and almost all world governments. Speak up you hypocrits and liars. Remember, FREEDOM OF SPEECH (but not for everyone - right ?!!!).
======================================
Subject: Ex-Mormon on Mormons
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints:
Is it right for you?
On what authority do I write this? I used to be a Mormon, that is my authority. I have never been one for PC titles so it is just going to be Mormons, none of this "saints" or "LDS" (LSD huh?) stuff from me.
At some time we have all had a visit from those Mormons on bicycles. We all react in different ways, some people pretend they cannot speak English. Some run out back and start up the lawnmower. I prefer to answer the door with a copy of the Satanic Bible by Anton Lavey (Levy). Though if you look out and see one of those shapely protestant girls that come by every so often you ought to stick the book back in the closet and invite her on in.
Though to take a more serious note the following is the basic outline of the why and wherefore of the Mormon church. Due to the fact it is not my intention to write a 75 page thesis paper this will be a short version, if you wish to know more all of this comes from Mormon Doctrine By Bruce R McConkie. The Mormon church teaches that in the "pre-existence" we all existed as god's "spirit children." I guess this is the divine answer to a love child. Only god at this point had a physical body of flesh and bone. We all wanted to be more like god and thus have our own bodies. So god sets about to devise a plan by which all of his spirit children may acquire our very own bodies. Jesus Christ presented the plan that all the spirit children by allowed to go to Earth and live by "free agency" (free will), he would come into the world and redeem mankind, and the glory would be god's. His elder brother Lucifer presented the plan that everyone be sent to Earth and forced to do that which is right, and the glory would be unto himself. I guess this means that the reason why you suffer at any point is because god is a glory hound. God gives the green light to Jesusâ plan and this upsets Lucifer a bit. Thus we have our little conflict in heaven. Wonder if the yet to be born hippies were having war protests at the Pearly gates? We all know the outcome of this war. From this point the Mormons follow the standard Adam and Eve on down the line with Catholics and Protestants.
The next real departure from standard Christianity comes after Jesus and all of his faithful disciples have been killed. The Mormons refer to the period after Jesus et all have been killed until Joseph Smith as the "apostasy." At this time Mormons believe that god had taken the true priesthood from the Earth. In comes Joseph Smith, who is having a small crisis of faith over which was the true church. So he goes to a little grove to ask god which pew he should have his ass in on Sundays. God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit appear to Mr. Smith and inform him that there is no correct church, but not to worry he as been selected to fix this little problem. Here we also see another major Mormon departure from standard Christianity, they do not accept the trinity concept, but believe that god, Jesus, and the holy spirit are three separate individuals. I guess this is easier than trying to explain how god's mother was the same woman he impregnated. Joseph Smith is also given another special treat, "the golden plates." According to the Mormons jews crossed the ocean a very long time ago and played out a strikingly similar drama to that which is contained in the Old Testament on the North American continent. How does a farm boy from New York translate golden plates that were in ancient Hebrew? Well according to the Mormons he had two magical thimble like devices. Sorry folks, I can only wish I was a talented enough creative writer to invent this material. Joseph Smith founds his church and the rest is history, but this isn't a history paper. If you are smart enough to be reading this site I assume you are smart enough to be able to dig up history on the Mormons if interested. Just a couple more doctrinal issues and then we can review "is it right for you?"
One thing the Mormons are certainly known for is polygamy. The LDS churches official policy is that they must follow the law of the land and thus polygamy is illegal. Be sure to note this is simply a legal issue, the Mormon church's official doctrine states that polygamy is just dandy. To save from making this a sociology paper I will avoid the subject of why polygamy is not good. Thus my free thinking friends I leave you free to draw your own conclusions about this piece of doctrine.
Mormons believe in three heavens or three degrees of glory, instead of the standard heaven or hell of other forms of Christianity. The Celestial, the Telstial, and the Terrestrial kingdoms are likened by Mormons to the glory of the sun, the moon and the Stars. Hell, or the outer darkness, is the place for Lucifer and those who fought with him. The only people eligible to go to the outer darkness are those that had full knowledge of god's existence and yet still choose to deny it. Thus only a very few individuals in history would be up for hell. The Celestial kingdom also has three degrees of glory within it. At the highest level individuals making it there will become their own gods with the power to create their own worlds and what not. Make it to church and you just might be a god some day, if there is a better sales pitch I haven't heard it. The Telstial kingdom is for those that were good, but not quite good enough to make the big time. After the thousand year reign of Jesus everyone but murders will be promoted out of the Terrestrial kingdom into the Telstial. Though no one gets an upgrade to Celestial kingdom. I guess it is true, youâve only got one shot to make the big time.
Another major relevant fact is the organization of the church. Starting from the top you have the "prophet" and his two consolers. The Mormons believe that the prophet receives revelation from god. Hey buddy, if you have a line to god how about the Powerball numbers? Then you drop into the Chorum of the 70, leadership from here is regional. Descending all the way to the Bishop of each local ward. The Mormon church has no paid clergy of any kind. Nice money maker, all the employees work for salvation. Every member of the Mormon church is issued duties, referred to as callings, which they are expected to do. It is a major strike against you if you don't do your callings. At the age of eight (also called the age of accountability or when the Mormons believe children are able to choose between right and wrong) children are baptized. Mormon rites are building block so no skipping steps. For females baptism is pretty much the end of the line until old enough to take their endowments (this is the point at which Mormons are required to wear special and magical underwear. Sampson had hair, Mormons have underwear. Go figure). For males at age 12 they are up for the priesthood. The Aaronic priesthood has three levels, Deacon (age 12), Teacher (age 14), and Priest (age 16). After this comes the Elder (age 18) and High Priest (age varies).
In this section on the Mormon temples I will finish out all the points of doctrine I wish to cover. The temples are the faculties in which the Mormons do all their big rituals, endowments, weddings for those deemed worthy, and so on. The Mormons also do rituals for the dead, if the guys on bikes don't get you they will after they plant you. Now to gain access to go into the temple you must have a temple recommend from you ward's bishop. To get a recommend you must follow the words of wisdom (Mormon dietary restrictions to be found in the Doctrine and Convents), pay your tithing (more strictly applied to men by far), do your callings, and so on. Now by tithe we aren't talking throwing a couple of bucks in the collection plate. You must report your income to the bishop and exact records are kept so that at the end of the year they can sit down with you and make sure you are all paid up. Now this isn't just if you can afford to take ten percent off the top, it is mandatory. For instance, if you ask a Mormon bishop if it was a choice between tithing and shoes for your kids he would tell you to pay your tithing. Like any business have to make sure the accounts receivable are all in order.
Alright, now the part you have all been reading for, a former Mormon gives the positive and negative elements of the Mormon church.
Positive aspects:
Well the Mormon church has taken heavily to recruiting every brown thing they can lay hands on, however, in White countries the Mormon church is almost totally white. They actively discourage (but not forbid) interracial couplings. They encourage large families, this is both positive and negative. Positive because it increases our numbers, negative because it increases the numbers of the already numerous under evolved bi-peds. They encourage social activities for their members.
Negative aspects:
Mormons are basically gentiles doing their best to be Jews, and they are doing a bang up job of it. They will go to any length to buy from their own, pay more, go out of the way, take inferior products, and so on. Clannish just doesn't cover it, only one word does, Jewish. They act like Jews in another regard, those born into the religion have a much higher status than those who converted. In reality converts exist as sort of an outcaste part of the Mormon social system. You will never met a more phony group of people than Mormons. They will smile and greet each other on Sunday, but just like Jews when the their fellow Mormon has his back turned they'll stab him and turn the knife. This is rooted in the fact that the Mormon church is much more like the Jewish religion than other forms of Christianity. Mormons are very touchy feely types. If you go to a Mormon church and are a male prepare to have your hand shook off. For you ladies, well everyone is going to be pawing at you. Though it is my observation that Mormon women use their sexuality as a means of control over their priesthood holding counterparts. Mormon morality is basically your standard Christian morality save for it is tuned up 10 notches. For example, a husband must cover his wife with a sheet and play with himself until almost ready. The longer he is inside the greater the sin. That is a joke, I think. But seriously, Mormons are extremely anal retentive about their "morality" and yet they seem to have a great number of loopholes.
Well there you have it folks, an ex-Mormon's opinion on the subject. Is the church right for you? Only you can answer that question for you. Though a final word of warning: mothers and fathers, do you really want to send your sons out at 18 for two years to some third world hole so the Mormon church can add a few new brown faces to its membership roles?
======================================
Subject: Founders' America
February 10, 2002
DEAR READER,
Subject: The Yellow Horde is an
Anti-White/Anti-Western
Migration
IF PATRICK BUCHANAN'S book, "The Death of the
West," isn't enough to prompt whites to become
more race conscious and less tolerant of multi-
racialism in their Western democracies, then
"Seeds of Fire" will.
READ "Seeds of Fire":
http://www.rense.com/general19/secretreportAL.htm
-Founders' America
###################################################
Chinese Tortoise Passes Russian Hare
to
Threaten Western Hegemony
The character, temperament, and intelligence of any
homogeneous people are genetic-based and uniform, and
mostly unaffected by influences outside natural
evolution.
You need only study China's
history to exactly predict
her future; unlike the unpre-
dictability of the Western
mind with its inherent
penchant to try this and that
and radically alter its course
--a mind at once trusting and
fearful in its willingness to
send advanced technology to
an enemy. Yes, China is an
enemy of the United States.
The ancient and deep psychological character of China
is feminine, collectivist, and inward-looking--until
she wakes from her deep introversion. Communism
suits her nature well (there is no word in Chinese
dialects for "private." The closest term for
describing the idea means "loneliness"). Her
experiment with capitalism is only means to an end:
EXPANSIONISM. Tibet is a "good" first step, then
Hong Kong (which the West is handing to her), and
then Taiwan and strategic interests across the
Russian border.
China is a stretching Titan,
rubbing the scales of slumber
from her eyes before swallowing
her neighbors. Russia might
stop China when she marches,
if it can momentarily abandon
its Balkanization to meet the
challenge.
Many pundits think that that's an absurd evaluation,
but when her massive war machine begins to march
they'll be apologizing for their naiveté.
China only toys with the West's
cultural proclivities; she's not
adopting Western values or its
economic freedoms--only temporarily
using them as means to strengthen
her military. China is a COMMUNIST
nation; it won't abandon what suits
its peoples character and leadership
quite well.
The domination of the EMOTING FEMININE MIND over the
RATIONAL MASCULINE MIND in the West explains why
America's leaders can't see the coming end to the
AMERICAN EXPERIMENT--or China's eventual, despotic
influence on the world.
I pray my conclusions are wrong.
Founders' America
P.O. Box 71024
Richmond, Va 23255
P.S. From my 1999 essay, "Why Wall Street
Capitalists Hate Families and Nationhood":
Why would "American" businessmen
care whether you and your family are
safe from Chinese nuclear rockets?
They don't, which is why American
merchants McDonnell Douglas, Hughes
Electronics and Loral Space and
Communications betrayed their nation
for profit, as Lenin had predicted:
"The capitalists of the whole world
and their governments will close their
eyes on the kinds of [grim and unscrupulous] activities I have described
and will become blind as well as deaf-mutes. They will extend loans which
will provide us with the equipment and
technology we lack and will thus help
rebuild our military industry, which
we need to launch subsequent victorious attacks against our suppliers. In
other words, the capitalist nations
will always work to prepare their own
suicide."
Go to :
Reader Mail Index
|